Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
R Ananthamurthy
award winner was born on 21st December 1932 in Melige village in Karnatakas Shimoga
studies in Tirthahalli and graduation from Mysore University. After completing his MA from
and completed his doctorate from the University of Birmingham in 1966. The subject for his
dissertation was The Fiction Writers of the Thirties He grew up in a very traditional milieu where
discrimination between castes and communities was rigorously maintained. Most of his story
lines question the traditional hierarchy in the society and the sacred rituals followed in Brahmin
societies. He married a Christian lady, Esther, and faced many problems for his interreligious
marriage as it was not accepted by his community. Ananthamurthy consciously stay away from
writing in English and started writing in Kannada. He is an important figure in Indian literature.
He experimented with the new facets of language and reality and there by ushered modernism in
to Indian literature. His work includes three novels, six collections of poetry and four collections
of short story, five collections of essays, two volumes of critical articles, and a stage play. His
novels, Samskara, Bharatipura, and Avasthe won critical acclaim, and his play was titled
Anveshan. He has recently translated Seventeen poems of W.B Yeats. He was the medium to
explore the relevance of some of the traditional values in the changed context of today.
Generally, he employs the method of point and counterpoint and creates characters to personify
opposing value systems. He draws heavily from the rich background of his childhood and
adolescence to build his stories. Prakriti, Kartika and Ghata Shradda are among the finest
stories in the language. His role as a critic has been of seminal importance in shaping the
direction of modern Kannada criticism. Ananthamurthy won acclaim from critics. He is among
the most influential writers and critics of the Navya or modernist school in Kannada. He won the
Rajyothsava award in 1984 and the Masti Venkateswara Iyengar award in1995 from the
Karnataka government. He won the Padma Bhushan in 1998.He is one of the fifty best writers in
India. He died on 22 August 2014 in Bangalore. He is one of Indias major modern creative
writers. The merit of his several fictional writings has been recognized internationally.
Samskara
translated in to English by A. K Ramanujan. The title of his translation is A Rite for a Dead Man.
The novel was made in to a film in 1970, directed and produced by Pattabhirama Reddy and
screen play by Girish Karnad. The title of the novel Samskara has different meanings. Samskara
is a fine discussion on the caste and class structure of India. The novel Samskara deals with
many issues of religion and untouchability and other social perspectives of Post- independence
India. Samskara is a religious novel about a decaying Brahmin colony in the South Indian village
ancient Hindu themes and myths and serious poetic study of a religious man living in a priest
community. It will decode the various forms of domination and hegemony by focusing on the
women characters of the novel. Samskara is a novel about the people in Agrahara, mainly of
Brahmin caste. The whole story of the novel focused on the last rites of a dead man.
Anantamurthy introduces the whole and exotic women characters in his novels. He has
moulded the women from different social and cultural sectors and one can equate them to the
women characters of the Indian epics- Ramayana and Mahabharata. His novels give a chance to
stop and look back at Indian tradition especially Indian womanhood. The Sanskrit word for
woman is sthree which means the safeguard of truth. Anantamurthy presents safeguard of
truth, truth in different perspectives in his novels. Ananthamurthy also shown that not only the
low caste women but even the high caste women are also exploited and marginalized. Brahmin
women in his novel have no opportunity to voice their feelings in any decision. They are just
confined to housekeeping and child nurturing within the male Laxmanrekha of purity. The male
have full domination over financial resources and are equipped with all freedom to have illicit
relationships with mistresses who are later abandoned to become whores and prostitutes leading
a deprived and hand to mouth lives worse than animals. Women are only treated as commodities.
The novel is set in an Agrahara in Durvasapura. The protagonist of the novel is Naranappa
and the novel begins with the death of Naranappa. The people in agrahara, especially the
relatives of Naranappa are not ready to perform the vital rites for him. Because Naranappa is an
anti- brahmanical Brahmin, a disreputed figure, who leads a vulgar life, always drinking wine,
eating meat, and leads an immoral life with a dalit, Chandri. After Naranappas death, she
approaches many people for the last rites of Naranappa. But no one helps her. She throws her
jewellery in to the body of Naranappa and she offered it to the man, who is willing to perform
the last rites for Naranappa. But there is no one ready to do the cremation of Naranappa. Chandri,
with great expectation, approaches Praneshacharya, most learned and devoted Brahmin for the
Cremation of Naranappa. But he refused the request. In between there is a physical relationship
between Praneshacharya and Chandri. So he totally disagreed to do the last rites because he
believes that he is not At last the body was cremated by a Muslim, named Ahmed Bari, a fish
Chandri
She is an important character in the novel. Chandri is a symbol rather than a realistic
character. She is a low- caste woman and she is the concubine of Naranappa, whom he had
brought over from near Kundapura. . She symbolizes all women of her caste and class. She is the
most discussed character in the novel after Naranappa. She is a prostitute. She is a dalit and an
untouchable to Brahmins. Brahmins believed that they will get polluted by her single look.
Everyone in the Agrahara hates her but secretly they want to possess her. She is a marginalized
character throughout the novel. She represents a woman who is very much conscious of her
identity and for that she has the capacity to exert it in a way that is not possible for Brahmin
wives. She is in many ways more free than the Brahmin women because, she is not toed down to
duty of just an onlooker. In the novel there is equal grade for Chandri and other Brahmin
women. There are many instances for the oppression faced by Chandri in the Brahmin
community. When she goes to Praneshacharya to inform him about the death of Naranappa she
stands in the yard. She wants to meet Praneshacharya again, after their physical relation, she is in
a state of utter confusion and she is afraid to go to the agrahara. But at last she gains courage and
she says Lets go there and see. If I feel strong enough I can sleep on the outer verandah. If not I
can go again to the Acharyas verandah. What else can be done in an emergency? So arguing
with herself she went straight home. She stood under the thatch and listened. Dogs barked
tonight like on any other night. She started climbing the steps. Her groping hand felt the open
door: Ayyo, o God, hope no fox or dog has entered the house and done things to the body she
felt distressed, forgot her fears. Once she also requests Naranappa to not eat the food cooked by
her. While the Brahmins gather to discuss the matter of Naranappas rites, she remains on the
periphery, sitting against a pillar. But at last she decided to offer her gold for the expenses of the
rites and this incident shocks everyone. She is the other by class and caste among the upper
caste Brahmins. Chandri emerges as a strong and independent woman in comparison to the
Brahmin women, who could not even cross the boundary of Agrahara. She is kind, lovable,
responsible, and hard working when compared to other women characters in the novel. Her
Puttas wife
Another woman character in this novel is wife of putta. Putta represents inter- caste
theory in the novel. He is a mixture of both Hindu caste and untouchable. Putta is the product of
an inter- caste marriage, naturally an untouchable. He has problems with his wife. So he always
beats her. His wife just wants to visit her parents because she loves them and she only follows
the advices of her parents even if she is the wife of putta, and his problem is that he does not
want to bear the expenses of her journey. It shows that, a woman cannot visit or love her parents
after marriage. Putta always want his wife for his own needs, he does not allow her to even love
her parents. She is constantly beaten by her husband and she is suppressed by her husband. She
even doesnt have a name of her own. She is known as the wife of Putta among the people in the
agrahara. She is in a state of identity crisis. Even though she belongs to the Brahmin caste she
Her best known name is half-wit Lakshmidevamma. She is an old and lonely woman.
She is a Brahmin and she resides on the outskirts of the village. She married at eight and
widowed at ten. Her mother-in-law and father- in law died when she was fifteen. Before she
was twenty her father and mother had died. Agrahara people believed that she is responsible for
the death of her dear ones. She represents the very male form of hierarchy and domination of
caste system where a woman even though belongs to the Brahmin caste cannot have her share in
the village community. She has to live alone and behaves like an untouchable. The economic
angle which is very clear is that after her father, husband and in laws and since she does not have
any son, her property and belongings will fall in to the hands of others.
Bhagirathi
Bhagirathi is Acharyas wife and a symbol of Praneshacharyas tapas. The most fatal of all
the women characters in the novel is Bhagirathi. She is the sick wife of Praneshacharya. She
feels that she is a burden to her husband and often she advices Praneshacharya to marry a healthy
and fruitful woman. She is a kind woman who loves her husband very much. She wishes for the
good future of her husband. She once asked her husband that Being married to me is no joy. A
house needs a child. Why dont you just get married again?
Anasuya
Anasuya is a Brahmin woman. She is the wife of Lakshmanacharya. She feels proud of her
husband when he denied performing the last rites of Naranappa. She once curses Chandri and
said that may tigers trample her at midnight, may snakes bite her, this whore, this seducing
witch!.
Women in this novel are the victims of patriarchal brahmanical society. There is no
importance for their emotions and feelings. They are passive throughout their life. They have no
dreams and hopes of their own. The readers are unaware about the feelings of women characters
in this novel. Women are only considered as commodities. Not only the low caste but also the
upper caste brahmanical women are confined to the four walls. The women, especially upper
caste women do not attack the social system based on hierarchies but try to make the most from
within its confines to their advantage even though they meet with resistance, amusingly from
their husbands and other male relatives. Women are the victims of triple oppression. They are
victimized on the basis of their gender, caste and class. Women are passive and they cant
articulate anything about their situation. Women are only objects for men and men considered
The two classes of women in this novel is, low caste women and upper caste
women. Bhagirathi, The sick wife of Praneshacharya, Lakshmidevamma, a half- mad child
widow, Anasuya, the wife of Lakshmanacharya and the wife of Shripati come from the Brahmin
campus. The wife of Naranappa, who was abandoned by him and died in insane condition, is
mentioned indirectly in the novel. Chandri, mistress of Naranappa, Belli, an untouchable girl,
Chinni, friend and neighbor of Belli, Padmavati, a prostitute are from the lower caste. Puttas
wife is also belongs to the lower caste. Outcaste women like Chandri and Belli are hallowed and
romanticized by references to classical heroines like, Shakuntala and Menaka. Besides being
classical, women like Chandri are also earthly and amoral, ideals of untroubled sexuality.
Another important thing about the feminist perspective of the novel is that Brahmin
women are depicted as plump, disfigured, ugly, unattractive, and ignorant for sexual pleasure.
They are quarrelsome and greedy about the material things. The low caste women, on the other
hand, are beautiful with attractive figures even though they are untouchables and are readily
available for sexual intercourse. They are not greedy about material belongings. The erotic
beauty of the low caste women has been articulated through upper caste Brahmin men in the
novel.
There are many other works in Indian literature that deals with the issues of low caste
women and brahminical patriarchy. For instance, Against the Madness of Manuby Sharmila
Rege. In this work she tries to portray Ambedkars role in the womens movement by invoking
his ideological fight against Brahminical patriarchy and how the caste system engenders the
Women occupy a prime place in many of Anandamurthys stories and novels. He tries
to portray the problems of women, not only the dalit women but also the high caste women.