Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Enter the statistic data from relevant biomass : Ash Ash hydrogen co
Husk EFB PKS Mes. Fibre %m dry (MF) %m wet ( %m dry (MF)
GCVdry mean 15.40 18 20 20 -316.8 20.00% 18.20% 4.70%
-23.1 20.00% 18.20% 4.70%
-141.9 20.00% 18.20% 4.70%
-5.6 20.00% 18.20% 4.70%
Define the probabilities of the alternatives : -55.4 20.00% 18.20% 4.70%
AR basis 4 33% -3.1 20.00% 18.20% 4.70%
MF basis 4 33% -316.8 20.00% 18.35% 4.70%
MAF basis 4 33% -23.2 20.00% 18.35% 4.70%
GCV 1 9% -141.9 20.00% 18.35% 4.70%
NCV 10 91% -5.7 20.00% 18.35% 4.70%
Wwet 4 50% -63.2 20.00% 18.35% 4.70%
Wdry 4 50% -2.2 20.00% 18.35% 4.70%
GCV dry
NCV dry
GCV wet
NCV wet
se this table :
rific value" is given at a certain "moisture", you should always wonder :
Is it GCV or NCV ?
Is it on Dry, Wet, or even Ash free mass basis ?
Is the moisture on Dry or Wet mass basis ?
g instantaneously each of these hypothesis : each line is a possible combination.
StanDev : Averages :
EFB Fuel : EFB EFB EFB EFB EFB
0.61 18.02 GCV dry : 18.54 17.39 18.10 18.67 17.41
0.28% 6.10% H dry : 6.30% 5.90%
2.26% 5.91% Ash dry : 7.30% 3.30% 7.13%
source : PORIM 1EcoSecuriMPOB 20
SIRIM 20CONSOLIDATED 2006
PKS Fuel : PKS PKS PKS PKS
2.08 20.49 GCV dry : 18.65 21.00 19.10 23.22
0.07% 6.25% H dry : 6.30% 6.20%
0.62% 2.77% Ash dry : 3.20% 2.33%
source : PORIM 1EcoSecuriMPOB 20
SIRIM 2008 Hartalega
Mesocarb Fi Fuel : Mesocarb
Mesocarb Fibers
0.63 20.30 GCV dry : 20.75 19.85
#DIV/0! 6.00% H dry : 6.00%
#DIV/0! 8.40% Ash dry : 8.40%
source : PORIM 1EcoSecurities 2003
Straw Fuel : Straw
#DIV/0! 15.20 GCV dry : 15.20
#DIV/0! 5.10% H dry : 5.10%
#DIV/0! 19.20% Ash dry : 19.20%
source : Omori 2006
Rice straw Fuel : Rice straw
#DIV/0! 15.40 GCV dry : 15.40
#DIV/0! 5.70% H dry : 5.70%
#DIV/0! 15.50% Ash dry : 15.50%
source : Omori 2006
Rice husk Fuel : Rice husk
0.31113 15.65 GCV dry : 15.87
0.00% 4.72% H dry : 4.72%
1.57% 23.51% Ash dry : 24.62%
source : BronzeOak
Bagasse Fuel : Bagasse
#DIV/0! 21.20 GCV dry : 21.20
#DIV/0! 6.10% H dry : 6.10%
#DIV/0! 11.30% Ash dry : 11.30%
source : Omori 2006
orific values
Rice husk
15.43
4.72%
22.40%
Hamada
Red text : wrong or suspicious values
StanDev : Averages :
CH4 Fuel : CH4 CH4 CH4 CH4 CH4
5.11 56.02 GAS GCV : 62.75 50.33 55.48 55.5
5.10 50.39 NCV : 57.09 44.67 49.82 50
0.51% 24.78% H dry : 25.13% 24.42%
source : physics Danish d http:// Ravi menNIST Chemistry WebBook
NG Fuel : NG NG NG NG NG NG NG
3.24 50.23 GCV : 52.51 54.91 51.01 46.62 46.85 49.51
GAS
graph maker
data from MPOB article, and CONSOLIDATED test
2008-06-26 ver1-2
put the data each on a separated sheet, with references and calculations about data interpretation
added data from SIRIM, EcoSecurities, PORIM
added the "Data summary", for overall result visualisation
added the multi entry table, for unknown value identification and fast diagnostic
2008-07-07 ver1-3
improved the Calorific value identifyer : probability calculated with color range
Corrected value for SIRIM : report data are NCVwet
2008-07-15 ver1-4
2008-08-08 ver1-5
PORIM 1999
PKS
18.65 MJ/kg dry
PORIM 1999
Mesocarp Fibers
20.75 MJ/kg dry
PORIM 1999
Renewable energy in malaysia - market p page 75 :
ETSU U/000/00069/REP
DTI/Pub URN 03/754
contractor : EcoSecurities Ltd
Published : Crown Copyright 2003
PKS
21.00 MJ/kg dry
6.30%
3.20%
EcoSecurities 2003
Mesocarb Fiber
19.85 MJ/kg dry
6.00%
8.40%
EcoSecurities 2003
from "MPOB - EFB PKS analysis - joprv18june-hussain.pdf"
Fuel : PKS .
GCV dry : 19.10 MJ/kg dry .
H dry : 6.20% .
Ash dry : 2.33% .
source : MPOB 2006 in "The J.
Fuel : EFB .
GCV dry : 18.10 MJ/kg dry .
H dry : 5.90% .
Ash dry : 3.30% .
source : MPOB 2006 in "The J.
total :
100 %
Wet basis ! (As Received)
total :
97.9 %
missing :
2.1 % (Ashes)
Dry basis (Moisture Free)
total :
106.8 %
Excess :
6.8 % (water)
Dry basis (Moisture Free)
total :
96.3 %
missing :
3.7 % (Ashes ? Ok, not far from 3.3%)
Dry basis (Moisture Free)
Fuel : EFB .
GCV dry : 18.67 MJ/kg dry .
H dry : .
Ash dry : .
source : SIRIM 2008 Hartale .
Fuel : PKS .
GCV dry : 23.22 MJ/kg dry .
H dry : .
Ash dry : .
source : SIRIM 2008 Hartale .
Total average :
with GCVwet assumption :
PKS GCVdry 21.16 MJ/kg
NCV wet
GCV dry = +9 . 01 .l
1w
NCV wet
GCV dry = +9 . 01 .l
1w
As Received = Wet basis
NCV wet w
GCV dry = +9 . 01 .l H 20 . h dry + l H 20 .
1w 1w
NCV wet w
GCV dry = +9 . 01 .l H 20 . h dry + l H 20 .
1w 1w
ISO 31-4 : 1cal = 4.184 J
Fuel : EFB .
GCV dry : 17.41 MJ/kg dry .
H dry : .
Ash dry : 7.13% .
source : CONSOLIDATED 2006 .
Asian Productivity Organization (APO, Tokyo)
July 2006, presentation in Bangkok
Expert: Hiroshi Omori, from Mitsubishi Chemical
p25 of pdf called "Omori_Part1_EnergyEfficiency.pdf"
http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file15138.pdf p29
NCV wet w
GCV dry = +9 . 01 .l H 20 . h dry + l H 20 .
1w 1w
tg
e Ash content following this hypothesis
http://www.hamadaboiler.com/en/cornertube/ricehuskcornertube.html
about RICE HUSK FIRED REVERSE CHAIN GRATE BOILER 35 TON/H 39 KG/CM2 450 C
LCV=3,031 Kcal/Kg
normal density
0.8200 kg/Nm3
GCV NCV
kJ/m3 MJ/kg
38,231 46.62 41.96
38,416 46.85 42.16
38,200 46.59 41.93
33,320 40.63 36.57
39,710 48.43 43.58
40,600 49.51 44.56
42,000 51.22 46.10
37,889 46.21 41.59
38,000 46.34 41.71
39,877 48.63 43.77
mean 38,624 47.1028 42.39
Ton equivalent oil
41.868 GJ/toe
toe/kton MJ/kg
541 22.65
629 26.33
441 18.46
564 23.61
614 25.71
545 22.82
543 22.73
444 18.59
516 21.60
574 24.03
541.10 22.65 mean