Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

D O M P E R I D O N E

Use of
Domperidone

as a Prokinetic

and Antiemetic

Lisa M. Albright, PhD


Austin, Texas

Parkinsons Disease
Parkinsons disease is a progressive movement disorder
characterized by degeneration of dopaminergic neurones in
the substantia nigra of the midbrain. Treatment is aimed at
increasing dopaminergic stimulation of the striatal neurons
involved in controlling movement, using dopamine-increas-
ing agents or dopamine agonists.10 Concomitant stimulation
of dopamine receptors at the CRT and, possibly, in the GI
tract results in the common side effects of nausea and vom-
iting. Domperidone is used prophylactically to counteract
these effects.11-12
Levodopa (L-Dopa), a precursor of dopamine, is a mainstay in
Domperidone is a synthetic benzimidazole compound that is the treatment of Parkinsons disease. Oral domperidone (10 to 20 mg
used as a prokinetic agent for treatment of upper gastrointestinal 3 times a day) has been shown to reduce levodopa-induced nausea
(GI) motility disorders and as an antiemetic. This compound also and vomiting.13
is gaining popularity as a galactagogue. Domperidone is a specific Domperidone (60 mg daily) reduced the incidence of nausea and
dopamine2 receptor (D2) antagonist that does not cross the blood- vomiting in a placebo-controlled study of patients receiving bromo-
brain barrier. It exerts its effect at peripheral D2 receptors in the criptine (a dopamine receptor agonist) therapy and allowed higher
GI tract; the chemoreceptor trigger zone (CRT), which is outside doses of bromocriptine to be tolerated.14
the blood-brain barrier; and the pituitary.1-4 The basic pharma- Parkinsons disease is characterized by unpredictable off peri-
cology of domperidone and its use as a galactagogue have been ods of poor drug response and increased parkinsonian symptoma-
reviewed in this journal and elsewhere.5-7 This article provides back- tology. Management of off periods with apomorphine (intermittent
ground information for use of domperidone as an antiemetic, with a injections or continuous infusion), a short-acting dopamine receptor
focus on Parkinsons disease, and as a prokinetic agent, with a focus agonist, was made practical by the use of domperidone to counter-
on diabetic gastropathy. act apomorphines potent emetic effects. Domperidone pretreat-
ment (10 to 20 mg by mouth 3 times a day) is typically started 1 to
Domperidone as An Antiemetic 3 days before apomorphine treatment is begun. Patients can often
Background gradually reduce or stop domperidone after a few weeks, as toler-
Vomiting is an organized process that is coordinated by an area ance develops to apomorphines emetic effects, possibly due to
of the medulla called the vomiting center or central pattern genera- down regulation of dopamine receptor sensitivity in the medulla
tor. The vomiting center receives input from several sources, in- (vomiting center) after continuous dopaminergic stimulation.15-19
cluding the CRT, GI tract (stomach and small intestine), higher Domperidone (20 mg 3 times a day) has been used to allow
cortical centers of the brain and the labyrinths, and orchestrates the quicker titration of pergolide as an adjunct to L-Dopa therapy.20
gastromotor functions that result in vomiting. Domperidones Hobson et al21 suggest domperidone as an adjunct to ropinirol or
action as an antiemetic is thought to stem from antagonism of D2 pramipexole therapy, two newer dopamine agonists that are rela-
receptors at the CRT.1,3,8,9 tively specific for D2 receptors.

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding


120
Vol. 9 No. 2 March/April 2005
D O M P E R I D O N E

Surgery-Postsurgical, Chemotherapy- or Radiation-Induced Emesis fullness, suggestive of underlying neuromuscular dysfunctions of


Early studies of domperidones utility for postsurgical, and the GI tract. Potential neuromuscular dysfunctions include gastro-
chemotherapy- or radiation-induced emesis used intravenous (IV) paresis (delayed gastric emptying), gastric dysrhythmias, antral-
or intramuscular administration (reviewed elsewhere).4 However, hypomotility and dilation, reduced antroduodenal coordination
parenteral forms of domperidone were withdrawn worldwide fol- and gastric tone dysfunction.26,36-37
lowing reports of severe adverse cardiac effects.12 Oral domperidone The correlation between upper GI symptoms and the rate of
has seen limited use in treatment and prevention of postoperative gastric emptying is relatively weak, thus gastroparesis is considered
nausea.22 In general, serotonin receptor antagonists are now recom- to be an indicator of gastroduodenal motor abnormality, rather than
mended as first-line treatment of chemotherapy- or radiation- the sole cause of the symptoms.3,26,29,36 Upper GI symptoms may
induced emesis; dopamine receptor antagonists may have a place as affect up to 50% of patients with diabetes, but symptoms do not
alternative or adjunct therapy.8,23-25 necessarily predict delayed gastric emptying.3,26,37 Conversely, pa-
tients with diabetes who have poor gastric emptying (up to 50% of
Prokinetic Activity of Domperidone patients with type 1 diabetes) may have no upper GI symptoms,
The stomachs function of receiving, preparing and delivering although they may experience poor glycemic control due to mis-
nutrients to the small intestine in a usable form is a complex process match of insulin administration with emptying of nutrients into the
in which the central, autonomic and enteric nervous systems all small bowel.3,26,36,37
play a role. Briefly, the main anatomical parts of the stomach are The etiology of diabetic gastropathy is not well understood.
the cardia, fundus, body and antrum. At the beginning of a meal, Autonomic neuropathy and hyperglycemia are thought to be two
the fundus relaxes to make room for the incoming food. After a lag dominant factors.
phase, regular contractions of the antrum mix food particles with Autonomic Neuropathy
acid and pepsin into a suspension called chyme, which is then emp- Vagal nerve impairment might alter antroduodenal motility,
tied through the pyloric sphincter into the duodenum, the first part gastroesophageal reflux activity and gastric secretory function.
of the small intestine. The gastric emptying rate depends upon the
physical and chemical characteristics of the stomachs contents;
typical gastric emptying time is 1 to 4 hours. In the interdigestive
period, four phases of spontaneous gastric contractions, some of
which are controlled by pacemaker cells of the stomach (interstitial
cells of Cajal), clear the stomach of undigestible solids.26
Dopamine is synthesized in the GI tract, spleen and pancreas
in humans; D1-like and D2-like receptors have been demon-
strated in several mammals at various GI sites. Dopamines effect
on the GI tract is primarily inhibitory, as evidenced by reduced
lower esophageal sphincter tone, reduced gastric tone and intragas-
tric pressure, and decreased antroduodenal coordination.1,3,26-28
Dopamine appears to directly inhibit gastric muscle contractions
via postjunctional muscular D2 receptors in the lower esophageal
sphincter, fundus and antrum.1,3,27 Domperidones prokinetic effect
is likely a result of blockade of D2 inhibitory receptors. It has been
shown to increase lower esophageal sphincter pressure, improve
antroduodenal coordination and gastric emptying and normalize
gastric dysrhythmias.28-32
Dopamine also has an indirect inhibitory effect via inhibition of
cholinergic transmission in the myenteric plexus, which regulates
the circular and longitudinal layers of smooth muscle. This inhibi-
tion was shown in isolated guinea pig stomach to be sensitive to
domperidone, indicating mediation by prejunctional D2 receptors
on postganglionic cholinergic neurons.33-34 However, domperidone
has not been shown to have procholinergic activity in isolated hu-
man stomach.1-3,35

Diabetic Gastropathy
Diabetic gastropathy is an umbrella term for a constellation of
upper GI symptoms in patients with diabetes, including nausea,
vomiting, bloating, abdominal discomfort and early satiety or

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding


121
Vol. 9 No. 2 March/April 2005
D O M P E R I D O N E

Although the association between gastroparesis and abnormal dopaminergics, should be ruled out.26, 36-37 Gastric scintigraphy
autonomic function is relatively weak, it is thought to be a con- (direct measure of the transit time of a radiolabeled meal) is the
tributing factor.26,36-37 most common, and considered to be the most accurate, way to
Hyperglycemia/Glucose Toxicity evaluate gastric emptying.36 Other methods for evaluating gastric
An inverse relationship has been shown between gastric empty- myoelectrical events include electrogastrophy, scintigraphic breath
tests, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging and antroduo-
ing and blood-glucose concentration both in healthy individuals and
denal manometry.37
in those with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. In addition, acute changes in
blood-glucose concentration can alter the perception of sensations Treatment
from the stomach and duodenum.26,36-37 Treatment focuses on improving upper GI symptoms, improv-
ing glycemic control and optimizing nutritional intake and quality
Other Factors
of life. Optimizing glucose control and avoiding drugs that can slow
Enteric neuropathy, altered postprandial release of hormones and
gastric emptying, followed by dietary and lifestyle modifications,
neurotransmitters, visceral hypersensitivity and psychological disor-
are the usual initial course of treatment. Common recommenda-
ders may potentially contribute to gastric dysfunction in patients
tions include smaller, more frequent meals that are low in fat and
with diabetes. In addition, there are many other causes of gastro-
fiber (to avoid bezoar formation); and increased nutrient liquids,
paresis besides diabetes.26,36-37
although controlled trials have not proven this approach to be
Evaluation of Patients effective. Moderate exercise is encouraged, as this accelerates gas-
Evaluation of patients with diabetes who present with upper GI tric emptying.26,36-37
symptoms should include a complete physical examination and Prokinetic agents are the mainstay of pharmacological treat-
medical history. Other causes of upper GI symptoms and poor gas- ment. Mechanisms of action include dopamine D2 receptor block-
tric emptying, such as mechanical obstruction, poor glucose control ade (domperidone and metoclopramide), stimulation of 5HT4
or medications that slow gastric emptying, eg, anticholinergics and receptors (metoclopramide and cisapride) and stimulation of mo-
tilin receptors (erythromycin).36 Placement of a feeding jejunostomy
tube is a treatment of last resort.26,36-37
Efficacy
Numerous clinical trials have consistently shown oral domperi-
done, typically 20 mg 4 times a day, to improve symptom scores,
improve gastric emptying, correct gastric dysrhythmias, decrease
hospitalizations and improve the quality of life in patients with dia-
betic gastropathy or gastroparesis.2-3,26,29-30,38-44 The complex etiology
of diabetic gastropathy, and the weak association between more
objective measurements of gastroduodenal function (gastric empty-
ing, electrogastrographic measurements) and symptoms, complicate
interpretation of these studies. Domperidones antiemetic function
must also be considered in assessing symptom improvement.
Symptomatic improvement is the most common outcome evalu-
ated in clinical trials of domperidone efficacy. Other parameters
include measurement of gastric emptying, gastric myoelectrical
rhythm recording, health-related quality of life assessment and hos-
pitalization rates. Many studies have methodological limitations
related to one or more parameters: small study size, lack of report-
ing of patients blood glucose levels, lack of placebo control, lack of
randomization, unblinded treatment or nonvalidated measurement
of symptoms.29,36,38-39 A meta-analysis39 of clinical studies of four pro-
kinetics (cisapride, metoclopramide, domperidone and erythromy-
cin) showed that open-trial and single-blind studies showed greater
improvement in both symptom assessment and gastric emptying
times than did double-blind trials, indicating a substantial placebo
effect and/or bias. The use of domperidone and metoclopramide
in the treatment of gastroparesis is currently under review by the
Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group.45
The largest clinical trial40-42 used a two-phase withdrawal design
to enrich the trial with treatment responders. In phase I, 269 in-
sulin-dependent patients with diabetes who had symptoms of

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding


122
Vol. 9 No. 2 March/April 2005
D O M P E R I D O N E

gastroparesis [8 out of 15 maximum in total symptom score (TSS)] Tolerability/Adverse Effects


received single-blind treatment with domperidone 20 mg 4 times a In one study of 17 patients with documented gastroparesis,
day for 4 weeks. Patients were classified as responders (n = 208, 77%) oral domperidone 40 to 120 mg/day was used for periods of up
if they showed statistically significant improvement in TSS at the to 4 years and was well tolerated.43-47 In the large study by Silvers
end of phase I (mean change from baseline 6.52; P <0.001).41 et al,41 the tolerability profile was similar to placebo. The most
Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was evaluated using the common (occurring in as many as 10% to 20% of patients) ad-
Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36), with aggregation verse effects described in most studies are related to increased
into a physical component summary (PCS) or mental component prolactin levels due to antagonism of D2 receptors in the anterior
summary (MCS) index; higher scores indicate better HRQOL. Re- pituitary, including gynecomastia, galactorrhea, breast tenderness
sponders also experienced significant improvement from baseline or menstrual irregularities. 3,4,29 In a double-blind, nonplacebo-
in both PCS (+3.47; P <0.001) and MCS (+5.23; P <0.001) indexes controlled, comparison of domperidone and metoclopramide in
during phase I.40 93 insulin-dependent patients with diabetes, elicited CNS effects
Patients classified as responders in phase I were randomized for (somnolence, akathisia, asthenia, anxiety, depression and mental
phase II, a double-blind parallel-group 4-week withdrawal study acuity) were fewer and less severe for domperidone.49 Case re-
with either placebo (n = 103) or domperidone 20 mg 4 times a day ports describing extrapyramidal symptoms have been summarized
(n = 105). During phase II, both groups experienced deterioration elsewhere 3 and in general indicate that the risk of developing
in TSS. The placebo group experienced significantly greater extrapyramidal side effects is minimal when domperidone is
deterioration than the domperidone group (+1.84 placebo versus taken orally by adults at recommended doses.
+0.85 domperidone; between-group difference P = 0.025).41 Increased blood pressure and heart rate have been seen in
In phase II, responders receiving placebo demonstrated a signifi- patients treated with oral domperidone 10 mg 3 times a day in
cant decline in PCS (1.77; P = 0.20), while those receiving domperi- conjunction with continuous subcutaneous infusion of apomor-
done experienced a statistically insignificant change (+0.65; P = phine.50 Parenteral forms of the drug were withdrawn from the
0.361; between-group P = 0.050). Both groups MCS scores were
statistically unchanged in phase II.40
Patients were also evaluated by scintigraphy at the outset of
the study for gastric emptying rates and classified into delayed
gastric emptying (DGE; n = 126; 44%) and normal gastric empty-
ing (NGE) classes; criteria were not reported. No significant differ-
ence was seen between NGE and DGE groups in baseline TSS or
TSS improvement during phase I, nor in the deterioration of TSS in
phase II.41-42
Talley38 has suggested that the two-phase withdrawal design
might be suboptimal because of the open-trial design of the first
phase. In addition, a straightforward interpretation of the results of
the withdrawal phase depends on the assumption that the disease
relapses and remits, which may not be the pattern in diabetic gas-
troparesis. Silvers et al41 acknowledge that potential bias of investi-
gators in assigning total symptom scores at the end of phase I might
have been a factor in the deterioration of TSS by the domperidone
group in phase II. Talley38 suggests that double-blind, parallel
group studies remain the trial design of choice, using validated out-
come measures of both symptoms and quality of life.
GI Symptoms in Parkinsons
Patients with Parkinsons disease can experience upper GI symp-
toms as a result of cerebral degeneration, degeneration of the myen-
teric plexus and antiparkinsonian medication.46 Extended domperidone
therapy (20 mg 4 times a day, mean follow-up 3 years) has been shown
to improve upper GI symptoms and gastric emptying.13,47
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Domperidone has not been shown conclusively to reduce the
number of reflux episodes or improve gastroesophageal reflux dis-
ease (GERD) symptoms. At this time, acid-suppressive agents have
become the drugs of choice for GERD.48

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding


123
Vol. 9 No. 2 March/April 2005
D O M P E R I D O N E

market in 1984 due to QT prolongation, ventricular arrhythmia 13.Parkes JD. Domperidone and Parkinsons disease. Clin Neuropharmacol
and cardiac arrest in patients receiving high IV doses.3,12 Physio- 1986; 9(6): 517532.
logically relevant concentrations of domperidone have been 14.Agid Y, Pollak P, Bonnet AM et al. Bromocriptine associated with a
shown to prolong cardiac repolarization in isolated guinea pig peripheral dopamine blocking agent in treatment of Parkinsons disease.
hearts, indicating the potential for association with QT prolon- Lancet 1979; 1(8116): 570572.
gation and ventricular arrhythmia clinically. 51 No clinically 15.Factor SA. Literature review: Intermittent subcutaneous apomorphine
important changes in vital signs or electrocardiographic activity therapy in Parkinsons disease. Neurology 2004; 62(6 Suppl 4): S12S17.
were observed in 286 patients using domperidone 20 mg 4 times 16.Bowron A. Practical considerations in the use of apomorphine injectable.
a day for 4 weeks and in 105 patients who were treated for 8 weeks.41 Neurology 2004; 62(6 Suppl 4): S32S36.
17.Hagell P, Odin P. Apomorphine in the treatment of Parkinsons disease.
Summary J Neurosci Nurs 2001; 33(1): 2134, 3738.
Domperidone is a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist with anti- 18.Pietz K, Hagell P, Odin P. Subcutaneous apomorphine in late stage
emetic properties and localization outside the blood-brain barrier Parkinsons disease: A long term follow up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
that have made it a useful adjunct in therapy for Parkinsons dis- 1998; 65(5): 709716.
ease. There has been a renewed interest in antidopaminergic pro- 19.Corsini GU, Del Zompo M, Gessa GL et al. Therapeutic efficacy of
kinetic agents since the withdrawal of cisapride, a 5-HT4 agonist, apomorphine combined with an extracerebral inhibitor of dopamine
from the market. 1 Domperidone continues to be an attractive receptors in Parkinsons disease. Lancet 1979; 1(8123): 954956.
alternative to metoclopramide because it causes fewer CNS side 20.Jansen PA, Herings RM, Samson MM et al. Quick titration of pergolide in
effects. Patients receiving domperidone or other prokinetic cotreatment with domperidone is safe and effective. Clin Neuropharmacol
agents for diabetic gastropathy or gastroparesis should also be 2001; 24(3): 177180.
managing diet, lifestyle and other medications to optimize gastric 21.Hobson DE, Pourcher E, Martin WR. Ropinirole and pramipexole, the new
motility. agonists. Can J Neurol Sci 1999; Suppl 2: S27S33.
22.Fujii Y, Saitoh Y, Tanaka H et al. Prophylactic oral antiemetics for prevent-
References ing postoperative nausea and vomiting: Granisetron versus domperidone.
1. Tonini M, Cippollina L, Poluzzi E et al. Review article: Clinical implications Anesth Analg 1998; 87(6): 4041407.
of enteric and central D2 receptor blockade by antidopaminergic gastroin- 23.Gralla RJ, Osoba D, Kris MG et al. Recommendations for the use of
testinal prokinetics. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 18(4): 379390. antiemetics: Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines. J Clin Oncol
2. Barone JA. Domperidone: Mechanism of action and clinical use. Hosp 1999; 17(9): 29712994.
Pharm 1998; 33(2): 191 197. 24.[No author listed.] Chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea
3. Barone JA. Domperidone: A peripherally acting dopamine2-receptor and vomiting. Amdipharm 2004. Available at: www.nauseaandvomiting.
antagonist. Ann Pharmacother 1999; 33(4): 429440. co.uk/NAVRES001-5-chemo-radio.htm. Accessed June 14, 2004.
4. Brogden RN, Carmine AA, Heel RC et al. Domperidone: A review of its 25.Dupuis LL, Nathan PC. Options for the prevention and management
pharmacological activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children.
the symptomatic treatment of chronic dyspepsia and as an antiemetic. Paediatr Drugs 2003; 5(9): 597613.
Drugs 1982; 24(5): 360400. 26.Smith DS, Ferris CD. Current concepts in diabetic gastroparesis. Drugs
5. Albright L. Domperidone in lactation: Use as a galactagogue. IJPC 2004; 2003; 63(13): 13391358.
8(5): 329335. 27.Vaughan CJ, Aherne AM, Lane E et al. Identification and regional
6. Gabay MP. Galactagogues: Medications that induce lactation. J Hum Lact distribution of the dopamine D(1A) receptor in the gastrointestinal tract.
2002; 18(3): 274 279. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2000; 279(2): R599R609.
7. Henderson A. Domperidone: Discovering new choices for lactating moth- 28.Valenzuela JE, Dooley CP. Dopamine antagonists in the upper gastroin-
ers. AWHONN Lifelines 2003; 7(1): 5460. testinal tract. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 1984; 96: 127136.
8. Gralla RJ. Antiemetic therapy. In: Bast RC, Kufe DW, Pollock RE et al, eds. 29.Prakash A, Wagstaff AJ. Domperidone. A review of its use in diabetic
Cancer Medicine. 5th ed. Hamilton, Ontario: B.C. Decker, Inc.; 2000. gastropathy. Drugs 1998; 56(3): 429445.
9. [No author listed.] Nausea and vomitingAn introduction. 2004. 30.Franzese A, Borrelli O, Corrado G et al. Domperidone is more effective
Amdipharm plc. Available at: www.nauseaandvomiting.co.uk/ than cisapride in children with diabetic gastroparesis. Aliment Pharmacol
NAVRES001-2-NandV-general.htm. Accessed June 14, 2004. Ther 2002; 16(5): 951957.
10.[No author listed.] Parkinsons disease: An overview. 2002-2004. 31.Koch KL, Stern RM, Stewart WR et al. Gastric emptying and gastric
Available at: www.pdf. org/AboutPD/. Accessed June 30, 2004. myoelectrical activity in patients with diabetic gastroparesis: Effect
11.[No author listed.] Domperidone (Systemic) (electronic version). of long-term domperidone treatment. Am J Gastroenterol 1989; 84(9):
Greenwood Village, CO: Thomson Micromedex; 2004. 10691075.
12.Parfitt K, ed. MARTINDALE: The Complete Drug Reference. 32nd ed.
London: Pharmaceutical Press; 1999: 11901191.

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding


124
Vol. 9 No. 2 March/April 2005
D O M P E R I D O N E

32.Schuurkes JA, Van Nueten JM. Dose-dependent stimulation of antro- 49.Patterson D, Abell T, Rothstein R et al. A double-blind multicenter compar-
duodenal coordination by domperidone via specific dopamine-receptors. ison of domperidone and metoclopramide in the treatment of diabetic
Arch Int Pharmacodyn Ther 1982; 256(2): 311314. patients with symptoms of gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94(5):
33.Takahashi T, Kurosawa S, Wiley JW et al. Mechanism for the gastro- 1230 1234.
kinetic action of domperidone. In vitro studies in guinea pigs. 50.Sigurdardottir GR, Nilsson C, Odin P et al. Cardiovascular effects of dom-
Gastroenterology 1991; 101(3): 703710. peridone in patients with Parkinsons disease treated with apomorphine.
34.Kusunoki M, Taniyama K, Tanaka C. Dopamine regulation of [3H]acetyl- Acta Neurol Scand 2001; 104(2): 9296.
choline release from guinea-pig stomach. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1985; 51.Drolet B, Rousseau G, Daleau P et al. Domperidone should not be consid-
234(3): 713719. ered a no-risk alternative to cisapride in the treatment of gastrointestinal
35.Sanger GJ. Effects of metoclopramide and domperidone on cholinergically motility disorders. Circulation 2000; 102(16): 18831885.
mediated contractions of human isolated stomach muscle. J Pharm
Pharmacol 1985; 37(9): 661664. Address correspondence to: Lisa M. Albright, PhD, at
36.Horowitz M, ODonovan D, Jones KL et al. Gastric emptying in diabetes: lmalbr@alum.mit.edu
Clinical significance and treatment. Diabet Med 2002; 19(3): 177194.
37.Lal L, Cushenberry L. A review of diabetic gastropathy. 2002; 27(11).
Available at: www.uspharm acist.com/index.asp?show=article&page=8_
998.htm. Accessed June 6, 2004.
38.Talley NJ. Diabetic gastropathy and prokinetics. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;
98(2): 264271.
39.Sturm A, Holtmann G, Goebell H et al. Prokinetics in patients with gastro-
paresis: A systematic analysis. Digestion 1999; 60(5): 422427.
40.Farup CE, Leidy NK, Murray M et al. Effect of domperidone on the health-
related quality of life of patients with symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis.
Diabetes Care 1998; 21(10): 1699 1706.
41.Silvers D, Kipnes M, Broadstone V et al. Domperidone in the management
of symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis: Efficacy, tolerability, and quality-
of-life outcomes in a multicenter controlled trial. DOM-USA-5 Study
Group. Clin Ther 1998; 20(3): 438453.
42.Patterson D, Silvers D, Kipnes M et al. Does gastric emptying status
in patients with diabetes influence the effectiveness of domperidone?
[Abstract] Gastroenterology 1997; 112(4) Supplement: A804.
43.Soykan I, Sarosiek I, McCallum RW. The effect of chronic oral domperi-
done therapy on gastrointestinal symptoms, gastric emptying, and quality
of life in patients with gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92(6):
976980.
44.Dumitrascu DL, Weinbeck M. Domperidone versus metoclopramide in
the treatment of diabetic gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95(1):
316317.
45.[No author listed.] Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic
Diseases Group. Metoclopramide and domperidone in the treatment of
gastroparesis (Cochrane Protocol). Abstracts of Cochrane Reviews. The
Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004. Available at: www. cochrane.org/
cochrane/revabstr/UPPERGIAbstractIndex.htm. Accessed December 21,
2004.
46.Jost WH. Gastrointestinal motility problems in patients with Parkinsons
disease. Effects of antiparkinsonian treatment and guidelines for manage-
ment. Drugs Aging 1997; 10(4): 249 258.
47.Soykan I, Sarosiek I, Shifflett J et al. Effect of chronic oral domperidone
therapy on gastrointestinal symptoms and gastric emptying in patients
with Parkinsons disease. Mov Disord 1997; 12(6): 952957.
48.Maton PN. Profile and assessment of GERD pharmacotherapy. Cleve Clin
J Med 2003; 70 Suppl 5: S51S70.

International Journal of Pharmaceutical Compounding


125
Vol. 9 No. 2 March/April 2005

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi