Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
OR PERSONALIZED LEARNING
Megan Kalina
educators and their critical role in teaching and provides evidence against
Watters, Alfie Kahn, and Neil Postman. This paper also evaluates the other
side of the argument while addressing the ideas from Marvin Minsky, Bill
Introduction
Humans have been educating youth informally for thousands of years, and since
more formal setting. For the most part, industrial model of school as we know it is
quite similar to the schools our parents attended and similar to the schools our
children do attend. If asked what the main difference is between school now and
school fifty years ago, the majority would insist the answer is an increase of
A major educational reform has been on the horizon for many years and
some individuals believe that this reform will include replacing educators with
Artificial intelligence is creating intelligent machines that carry out tasks that
artificial intelligence, one of the first major proponent for artificial intelligence and
spent countless years promoting the development of AI. In 1959 Minsky founded
TEACHERS CAN NOT BE REPLACED 4
M.I.T.s AI Project that led to countless research papers and led Minksy to
receive the Turing Award in 1969 (Rifkin, 2016). The Turing Award is considered
the computer sciences highest prize. During his time at M.I.T., Minsky inspired
many scientists to explore the field of AI, and he dedicated his entire life to
promoting the needed investment into developing AI. Although his frustration with
the lack of advancements were quite evident, his strong belief that robots would
take over doing every day tasks held true until his recent passing.
Minsky isnt the only one that predicted that teachers will eventually be
replaced with robots. B.F. Skinner compared the ideal classroom to that of a well
as the proposed robots leaching into our classrooms, one cannot possibly feel
example is not the main means of influencing others; it is the only means.
(Ekeren, 1988, p.234). Minksy and SkinnerThese individuals did not reflect on
this important component; if our students are spending the majority of their day
with a robot that is only trained to teach, then what or who do our children
become? Anyone with any experience in education knows that teaching is much
deeper than the subject matter as children are not simple creatures.
that human language is developed through the number of words that are spoken
achievement (Ortiz, Stowe, & Arnold, 2001).. This does not include the number of
The research suggests that children from more affluent households spend less
comparison to their peers (Fernald, 2014). Parent involvement with their childs
human being. Furthermore, machines lack the compassion and trust that
been tested with limited success. The Turing test was developed in 1950 by Alan
Turing; this test evaluates whether a machine is intelligent. Very few machines
have passed the Turing test, with only two machines passing to date. The Turing
test only requires 30% of the judges to be fooled into thinking the robot is an
actual human being. With a 70% margin for failure, the Turing test appears to fall
short on convincing people that the results are reliable or valid. A pedalogical
agent named Clippy was supposed to guide people through using Microsoft
Office in 1997. People hated Clippy and much preferred to ask a real human for
help while learning the product (Watters, 2016). Siri is a more recent bot that has
found its way into the hands of many people through the millions that own an
iPhone. Ron Lee tested Siri by asking Siri the same questions that are asked of
creating these machines. While Minsky is on the extreme side in support of AI,
especially when he refers to robots replacing humans entirely due to our flawed
possibilities with the robot never aging and continually being able to work on a
problem without other distractions that debilitate the workings of our mind. While
these robots may be able to work longer and more thoughtfully with the
possibility of solving major issues such as cancer, with truly intelligent machines,
technology becomes greater than us and we lose control (N. Postman, 1998).
The new television series Westworld portrays the potential negative effects of
creating robots. The creators of these robots lose control and the similarities to
humans are too similar to differentiate between whom is human and whom is not.
The only difference is their inhuman qualities, which makes them invincible.
Comparing our future to that of a television show may seem absurd, however,
the similarities to those that support AI and this show is frightening and should
water; we give very little thought to how the technology we implement into our
daily lives effects other aspects of our lives. If robots are created that pass the
Turing test with a high percentage of the judges believing they are human, then
we are creating a being that is more intelligent than ourselves. Postman insisted
that we teach our students to be well versed of the effects as well as the history
of technology so we create adults that use technology rather than being used by
it (1996). Technology is a tool and should be treated as such. All tools have their
place and can be valuable, but as with all tools, they can be deadly. Technology
always has side effects; the effects must be weighed carefully and not taken
lightly.
Personalized Learning
The restmajority of this paper will be focused on personalized learning due to the
learning differs from AI as it does not completely replace the human. Another
many schools with many supporters pushing personalized learning into every
school in America.
challenges advanced students while scaffolding other students and bringing the
students up, ultimately closing the achievement gap. In Alfie Kahns article Four Formatted: Font: Italic
Reasons to Worry About Personalized Learning he compared personalized Formatted: Font: Italic
TEACHERS CAN NOT BE REPLACED 8
learning to that of Burger Kings, Have it your way! campaign (2015). The
learning may be personalized, but youre still beginning with the same hunk of
factory-produced frozen beef. Personalized learning does not truly take into
decides if you get extra mayonnaise or not. Kahn also emphasizes that true
personalized learning is allow the child to develop their own educational path; the
When he refers to us, he is referring to the creators of the programs that we are
trusting to educate our children. The most troubling factor is these programs are
not being developed by educators that have our students best interests in mind.
Bill Gates and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative are major proponents for the
million dollars to support their endeavor (Herold, 2017). On the surface it appears
that Gates and Zuckerberg are providing resources to kids and funding pilot
programs for the better of education. However, it does not take much research to
uncover the true motive: money. Gates has jumped from one thing in education
to the next and drawing many skeptics. He has gone from promoting charter
and now promoting personalized learning. Moving from one big thing to the next
can have consequences that stretch much further than Gates (Reckhow, 2017).
Due to this heavy monetary influence, Gates and Zuckerberg are defining what
personalized education is with very little input from educators (Watters, 2017).
There are research-based practices that personalize learning that do not include
TEACHERS CAN NOT BE REPLACED 9
education system is built upon marketing and whomever can package the newest
curriculum in the flashiest manner that promises to make teaching easier and
Time and time again, educators have seen practices based on the same
major theories cycle through their classrooms. The educator is usually forced to
adopt the new best way for the best way to only change a few years later. The
issue lies in the disconnect between the classroom and those that design the
curriculum. The curriculum designers usually have very little experience with
educating children despite their vast experience in their field. Even with the
funding being provided to schools for new programs, the schools are then in turn
forced to provide technology that can properly run the programs. Once the
program and funding fizzles out and the designers have moved on to the next
best thing, leaving schools with expensive technology, confused educators, and
leads to another issue with personalized learning; the children are not creating
experience.
the students need for socialization. Humans are social by nature and
socialization has many educational benefits. Alfie Kahn emphasizes the amount
of learning that takes place through collaboration. Children make sense of their
TEACHERS CAN NOT BE REPLACED 10
world through experiences and feedback from peers. Personalized learning does
not take into account a confused look, misconception, or prompt the child while
the child seeks to fit the new information into their schema. Without socialization,
an even bigger problem ensues. If you ask a child what their favorite part about
going to school is, many students will include playing, talking, or learning with
friends. Students are motivated to attend school and put forth the effort in
lessons because they are motivated. Motivation is a feeling within us that pushes
us to pursue an activity and remain actively engaged (Ormond, 2016). There are
peers, and schemas of an individual. Motivation can manifest itself in many ways
with both internal and external motivation playing a factor into a students
are used as the only mode of instruction, then the students become uninterested
because playing video games incessantly eventually loses its appeal. Without
students will not engage with the software rendering it completely useless.
Conclusion
Educators must be willing to stand up for what is best practice for their students.
Our students are already being inundated with personalized learning experiences
that are anything but personal. Students are spending hours testing each year
TEACHERS CAN NOT BE REPLACED 11
with the information providing little regard to the instructional design component
technology or it will swallow them whole and take their students with them
but this is only possible if we allow us to be replaced. Educators know they are
not replaceable; they just need to find their voice and tell others the same.
Artificial intelligence and personalized learning are here to stay, but they need to
References
Altwerger (Ed.) Reading for profit: How the bottom line leaves kids
the Bottom Line Leaves Kids Behind, ed. by Bess Altwerger (Heinemann,
2005), p. 226.Ekeren, G. (1988). Words for all Occasions. Retrieved from Formatted: Font: Italic
low-income preschool children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), Formatted: Font: Italic
7987.
Hart, B., Risley, T. (2003). The Early Catastrophe: The 30 Million Word Gap by
Herold, B. (2017). Gates, Zuckerberg Philanthropies Team Up on Personalized Formatted: Line spacing: Double
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/DigitalEducation/2017/06/gates_zuckerbe
rg_philanthropy_personalized_learning.html
Ortiz, C., Stowe, R.M., & Arnold, D.H. (2001). Parental influence on child interest in
shared picture book reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 16, Formatted: Font: Italic
263281.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Postman#cite_note-news-7
TEACHERS CAN NOT BE REPLACED 13
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/DigitalEducation/2017/06/gates_zuckerbe
rg_philanthropy_personalized_learning.html
Skinner, B.F. (1956). Teaching Machines and Turing Machines: The History of
http://alicebot.blogspot.com/2013/07/turing-test-no-sirie.html
http://hackeducation.com/2017/07/18/personalization
Watters, A. (2016). Clippy and the History of the Future of Educational Chatbots.