Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2015)
323
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2015)
III. MODAL ANALYSIS
Modal analysis was carried out on forged steel IV. HARMONIC RESPONSE
material whose properties are as follows : A harmonic, or frequency-response, analysis considers
Table I loading at one frequency only. Loads may be out-of-
material properties of forged steel phase with one another, but the excitation is at a known
frequency.
Youngs modulus 2.21e11 Pa
In a harmonic analysis, Youngs Modulus, Poissons
Poissons ratio 0.3 Ratio, and Mass Density are required input. All other
Bulk modulus 1.84e11 Pa material properties can be specified but are not used in a
Shear modulus 8.50e10 Pa harmonic analysis
Yield strength 6.25e08 Pa Because of the fact that modal coordinates are used, a
Ultimate strength 8.27e08 Pa harmonic solution using the Mode Superposition method
Density 7833 Kg/m3 will automatically perform a modal analysis first.
CONDITION 1 FREE-FREE Simulation will automatically determine the number of
modes n necessary for an accurate solution
In this analysis no boundary constraints were applied Although a free vibration analysis is performed first,
on the model and modes are extracted. The solver used is the harmonic analysis portion is very quick and efficient.
Block Lanczos and settings used in ANSYS are as Hence, the Mode Superposition method is usually much
follows faster overall than the Full method. Since a free vibration
Table II analysis is performed, Simulation will know what the
Ansys settings used natural frequencies of the structure are. In a harmonic
analysis, the peak response will correspond with the
Object Name Modal (A5)
natural frequencies of the structure. The analysis settings
State Solved used for harmonic response are as follows
Physics Type Structural Table III
Ansys settings for harmonic response
Analysis Type Modal
Solver Target Mechanical APDL State Fully Defined
Environment Temperature 22. C Range Minimum 0. Hz
Generate Input Only No Range 5000. Hz
Maximum
Object Name Pre-Stress (None) Solution 100
Intervals
State Fully Defined
Solution Method Mode Superposition
Pre-Stress Environment None
Cluster Results No
CONDITION 2 WITH BOUNDARY CONDITIONS Modal Program Controlled
In this analysis the crankshaft was subjected to Frequency
boundary conditions. Ball bearing constraint was applied Range
for 180 degrees as surface contact on one side and journal
bearing constraint was applied for 180 degrees on the
other side as a line contact.
324
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2015)
Frequency and phase response was analyzed for the Mode shapes
crankpin portion of the crankshaft. The load magnitude
considered was 20.894 MPa as this was the maximum
load obtained from dynamic analysis.
V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Natural frequencies for condition 1 free-free are given
as follows
Table IV
frequencies and corresponding modes
6. 4143.9 Bending
7. 4692. Bending
8. 5026.3 Bending + Torsion
9. 5237.8 Bending + Torsion
10. 5368.7 Bending + Torsion
11. 5623.7 Bending
12. 5974.7 Bending
Fig.11 Mode 4 (combined bending and torsion)
MODE SHAPES
326
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering
Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2015)
The natural frequencies of two conditions were found
out and analyzed. The variation of number of modes vs
frequency has been plotted graphically. Mode shapes are
observed for careful examination of deformation. The
type of mode with the corresponding frequency has been
tabulated. These characteristics prove to be very helpful
in the design of the crankshaft for dynamic conditions.
Harmonic response of the crankshaft for the excitation
in the range of 0-5000Hz has been studied. Variation of
stress and displacement amplitude (frequency response)
with respect to frequency has been graphically plotted.
Phase response of the crankshaft has also been studied.
These characteristics help in better understanding of
vibration response of a component subjected to dynamic
loading.
327