Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Upgrade to version 6.0 has been deferred until after the 4.7 Upgrade. It was
determined that the additional level of complexity that upgrading two systems
at once was more riskier than going with the benefits. Testing of current
1 Defer Portal Upgrade to v 6.0 Denise Q. Complete Portal version with 4.7 has shown that there are no significant problems. 2-Mar-05
The scope of the Upgrade will include version 6.40 of the Web Application
Server. WAS 6.40 is a necessary prerequisite prior to going with the Portal
2 WAS 6.40 in scope Denise Q. Complete v6.0, since it eliminates the need for a separate ITS. 2-Mar-05
Upgrade to GUI version has been deferred until after the 4.7 Upgrade. It
was determined that the additional level of complexity that upgrading two
systems at once was more riskier than going with the benefits. Testing of
3 GUI Upgrade Denise Q. Complete current GUI version with 4.7 has shown that there are no significant problems. 2-Mar-05
Decisions regarding whether a particular utility needs to be written to handle
4 Entrust LVTS Requirement ? Denise Q. Complete change for QAS or PROD are being noted in the Problem Log. 8-Apr-05
Given that the number and scope of Impacts will be small, there will be no
formal training sessions. Impact awarenss is being covered during the testing
5 HR Training ? Doug M Complete preparations discussions. 15-Apr-05
Utilities for maintaining User
report variants, PIDs and Decisions regarding whether a particular utility needs to be written to handle
6 Favourites during Upgrade Doug M Open change for QAS or PROD are being noted in the Problem Log.
The Total Role-to-Postion Assignment (HR & Non-HR) initiative will be out of
Scope of Authorizations and scope for the Upgrade. Also further development of role-based assignments
Profile changes needs to be in non-HR roles, will be considerd out-of-scope unless small changes can be
7 confirmed Doug M Complete accomodated. 23-Mar-05
DMAS to get separate testing Separate environment will ensure I-Testing for Upgrade is not interfered by I-
8 client in 4.7 QAS Doug M Complete Testing with DMAS. 23-Mar-05
9 Contingency Plan Doug M Open Meeting scheduled for May 9 to discuss proposed contingency plan
No Issue Short Description Originator Status Priority
1 Transition Project has caused Doug M Closed Historical
some unexpected delays
14- March. The plan shows 4.6C being unavailable from 01 April to 22 April.
However new HR functionality will have been just relased to Production the
week before 01 April, thus posing a potential risk. Tech team is to review
procedure and suggest a revised plan where the 4.6C DEv box can be still
available until after 07 April. 30-March Revised plan allows for continuous
4.6 availability.
16- March We need to identify what tests will be performed to confirm the S of
D
23 - March. Need to resolve server and connectivitiy issues related to RWD
Infopak connection to PROD
30 - March. The power outage incident needs to be followed up to make sure
that proper notification of failure is communicated. The Upgrade team has
lost 1 day of productivity.
7 If Go-live date is not achieved, Doug M. High Low Assume The Go-live date of May 24 will be mandatory to achieve.
M.E. activities for May are M.E. activties would be one of many issues to deal with if the
affected. (e.g. Procurement cards) date were missed.