Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 8

ISSN (Print) : 0974-6846

Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 9(2), DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i2/86353, January 2016 ISSN (Online) : 0974-5645

Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Empirically


Study the Impact of Organizational Climate
on Employees Work Related Attitude in
Information Technology Organizations
in Chennai City
A. K. Subramani1, N. Akbar Jan2, H. Moideen Batcha2 and N. Vinodh2
Vel Tech Business School, Vel Tech University, Chennai - 600085, Tamil Nadu, India; aksubramani@gmail.com
1

2
Department of Management Studies, Vel Tech High Tech Dr. Rangarajan Dr. Sakunthala
Engineering College, Chennai - 600062, Tamil Nadu, India; akbarjan.1975@gmail.com,
hmoideenbatcha @gmail.com, nvinodhsiva@gmail.com

Abstract
Background/Objectives: Information Technology (IT) industry is a fast growing industry, in that the developing countries
trying to cope with changes made in developed countries. It is very important to study the organizational climate of such
type of industry and the various kinds of variables that has a strong influence on establishing a dynamic organizational
climate. The main objective of the study is to study the impact of organizational climate in Information Technology
Industry in Chennai using Structural Equation Modeling technique. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The research followed
descriptive research. This research was conducted among employees of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), Infosys, Wipro,
Hindustan Computers Ltd. (HCL), Tech Mahindra and L&T Infotech, those company offices located in Chennai. The 200
samples each from the above mentioned companies were chosen for the study. Snowball sampling techniques was used
to select the sample from the population. The structured questionnaire was used to collect the primary data. Findings:
Structural Equation Modeling was used to test the conceptual model. The conceptual model developed was found to be fit,
so from the research, it is concluded that the congenial organizational climate cultivate the positive attitudinal outcomes
for the employees and overall development for the organizations as well. Applications/Improvements: The model tested
in this research is a maiden attempt to find out the impact of organizational climate on employees work related attitude.

Keywords: Akbar-Subramani SEM Model, Employees Work Related Attitude, Information Technology (IT), Job In-
volvement, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Climate, Organizational Commitment, Structural Equation Model (SEM)

1. Introduction industry scenario. Only a few organizations in the world,


becomes trend setters in the industry. While comparing
Today the world becomes a global village, the to the past decade, the information technology industry
competitions among the business organizations increases scenario has changed a lot. Nowadays the organizations
day by day, even second by second. Every second is have to be dynamic, either should make positive changes
crucial for the organizations, to survive, to retain the (i.e. Trend setters) in the industry or should react (i.e.
present position and to go ahead in pace with changes in Trend followers) to the changes in a positive manner. The

* Author for correspondence


Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Empirically Study the Impact of Organizational Climate on Employees Work Related At-
titude in Information Technology Organizations in Chennai City

organization cant become dynamic over night; it should from the organization, deals with its members and its
create such kind of organizational culture and climate environment7. Climate is a set of measurable properties
over a period of time. of the work environment, based on the collective
Dynamic organization can be defined as organizations perceptions of the people who work in the environment
operate in business environments characterized by and demonstrated to influence their motivation and
frequent and discontinuous change, they compete by behaviour8. In other words, organizational climate is a
marketplace agility; that is on their ability to generate relatively persistent quality of the internal environment
streams of both large and small innovations in products, that is experienced by its members, impacts on their
services, solutions, business models, and even internal behaviour and can be described in terms of the value of a
processes1. Marketplace agility requires the reallocation particular set of characteristics of the organization.
of resources, including human resources. A dynamic
work force is the one that forecast and accepts the changes 1.2 Employees Work Related Attitude
in the industry and cooperate with top level executives; Attitude is disposition, demeanour; it is a manner of doing
to ensure the success of the organization in any kind of things. It is the spirit that underlies our behaviour. It is the
situations. The organizational climate plays an important attitude and emotion that employees put with our actions
role; it becomes heart-beat of the organization. and the temperament that defines who we are and what we
Indian software organizations are taking measures to do. A good attitude brings a caring, positive and upbeat
ensure that employees are satisfied and do not get inten approach, whereas a bad attitude is harmed by uncaring,
tions to quit2. Every organization is trying to create an rude and negative behaviour. Organizational climate and
innovative organizational culture to ensure the success culture plays a vital role in shaping the attitude of the
of their businesses3 and attempting to create a favourable employees. The work-related attitudes are organizational
atmosphere within the organization, which shall ensure commitment, job involvement and job satisfaction. The
better employees work related attitude (i.e. organizational attitude of a person towards his job or organization or
commitment, job involvement and job satisfaction) anything cannot be directly measured. Unlike production,
and improved productivity of the employees4. Here, sales, etc. that can be quantitatively measured and that too
organization is interpreted as a dynamic process, since directly in case of a study on attitudes a direct quantitative
it is a simple mechanism for coordinated behaviour. The measurement is not possible.
satisfaction of employees with organizational climate is
a predictor of better performance. The organizational
climate is having impact on organizational support, 1.3 Organizational Commitment
organizational justice and organizational citizenship Organizational commitment can be one of many facets
behaviour5. that can be studied in order to measure workforce
In this study, the researcher is intended to find out attachment to an organization within a definite climate.
the perception of the employees towards the various Today, firms tend to create comfortable atmosphere and
dimensions of organizational climate and its impact on suitable working environment to enrich performance,
work related attitude (i.e. organizational commitment, job increase job satisfaction, decrease employees turnover
involvement and job satisfaction) of employees working and absenteeism and to improve workers involvement
at IT companies in Chennai. and connection to the organization as a whole entity.
Three different forms of organizational commitment
are Affective commitment, Continuance commitment
1.1 Organizational Climate and Normative commitment. Affective commitment
Organizational climate refers to a descriptive represents involvement, participation, emotional
perception of a set of attributes of a work environment. attachment and identification of workers with the
Organizational climate research can be traced back to organization that lead to low employees turnover (feelings
the late 1930s, from the researches related to aggressive of loyalty). Continuance commitment is when employees
behaviour in groups under various conditions of social believe it is in their own personal interest to remain
climate6. Organizational climate as a set of attributes within the same organization. Normative commitment is
specific to a particular organization that may be induced an emotional obligation towards the organization. That is,

2 Vol 9 (2) | January 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology
A. K. Subramani, N. Akbar Jan, H. Moideen Batcha and N. Vinodh

a person should continue employment due to moral and through the structured questionnaire. For this research,
ethical norms. It is viewed as an acceptance about ones the top six IT companies, which come under the top
responsibility towards the organization9. 20 ranking companies in 2013-14 in the IT industry as
mentioned in the NASSCOM (The National Association
1.4 Job Involvement of Software and Services Companies) website was selected.
Job involvement refers to the degree to which individuals As per the NASSCOM list the top six IT companies
psychologically identify with their present job10. For listed are TCS, Infosys, Wipro, HCL, Tech Mahindra
highly involved employees, their jobs seem inexorably and Mahindra IT Systems and L&T Infotech21. The
connected with their very identities, interests and life respondents for our study are those who are employed in
goals and are crucially important11. Job involvement TCS, Infosys, Wipro, HCL, Tech Mahindra and Mahindra
develops in the individual through a long and meaningful IT systems and L&T Infotech located in Chennai city. The
process12,13. The prevailing assumption in research is that snowball sampling technique has been used to select the
high job involvement is an inherently desirable attribute employees from the selected IT companies for the study.
of employees, since job involved workers develop. About 1450 questionnaires was circulated among the
Indeed, highly job involved individuals generally seem employees working in selected IT companies, only 1200
to be satisfied with their jobs, to be in characteristic valid questionnaires were chosen as primary data for
positive moods at work and to be highly committed to the study after rejecting the incomplete and inconsistent
their employing organizations, their careers and their questionnaire, in which 200 sample respondents were
professions14,15. selected from each company.
The questionnaire to assess organizational climate
was framed on the basis of Organizational Climate
1.5 Job Satisfaction Questionnaire (OCQ) developed by Litwin and Stringer
Job satisfaction is a positive emotional state that occurs with appropriate modifications22, job satisfaction scale
when a persons job seems to fulfil important job values, was developed on the basis of Measures of Job Satisfaction
provided these values are well-matched with ones (MJS) developed by Traynor23, whereas the organization
needs16. In other words, job satisfaction can be defined commitment scale was sourced from three-component
as, an intangible, unseen, unobserved variable and a Meyer and Allen model and job involvement scale was
complex assemblage of cognitions (Beliefs or Knowledge) formed on the basis of Lodahal and Kejner Model.
and emotional feelings (Sentiments or Evaluations) and The questionnaire meant for the respondents was pre-
such behavioural tendencies17. Job satisfaction is the tested with 75 employees from the selected IT Companies.
persistent feeling towards discriminable aspects of the job After pre-testing, necessary modifications were made in
situation18,19. Job dissatisfaction are seen as function of the questionnaire to fit in the track of the present study.
perceived relationship between what one wants form one Finally, the questionnaire was checked by the reliability
job and what one perceives it as entailing. Organizations test for the fifty samples. As per the test for reliability,
that have goals to achieve satisfy and happy staff. Job a high scale reliability alpha = 0.921 for the section
satisfaction is the degree to which employees enjoy employees perception towards organizational climate,
their work job satisfaction is an integral component alpha = 0.938 for the section of job satisfaction and 0.947
of organizational climate and an important element in for the section of employees performance and alpha =
management employee relationship20. 0.903 for the section of organizational commitment.
The researcher has used the below mentioned
2. Research Methodology formulae for calculation of sample size for an unknown
population: ZS
2

The study is descriptive in nature. The main objective of Sample size n = (1)
E
the study is to develop a model integrating the factors of Where, Z =Standardized value corresponding to a
organizational climate and portray its relationship with confidence level of 95% = 1.96.
employees work related attitude. The survey method S = Sample SD from pilot study of 75 samples =
of data collection was adopted to collect primary data 0.8836.

Vol 9 (2) | January 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology 3
Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Empirically Study the Impact of Organizational Climate on Employees Work Related At-
titude in Information Technology Organizations in Chennai City

E =Acceptable error 5 % = 0.05. commitment, e6: Error term for Job involvement, e7:
2
Error term for Job satisfaction, e8: Error term for Em-
1.96 * 0.8836 ployees work related attitude and e9: Error term for
Hence , Sample size n =
0.05 Organizational Climate.
= 1199.73 ~ 1200,
Where n = 1200. Hence number of variable in the SEM is:
The conceptual framework is presented in Figure Number of variables in the model : 18
1. The Akbar-Subramani Structural Equation Model
Number of observed variables : 07
was developed for impact of organizational climate
Number of unobserved variables : 11
on employees work related attitude and tested using
Number of exogenous variables : 09
Structural Equation Modeling approach (Figure 1).
Number of endogenous variables : 09

The Figure 2 (a and b) represent the computed


estimates of Akbar-Subramani Structural Equation
Model for impact of organizational climate on employees
work related attitude.

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

3. A
 kbar-Subramani Structural
Equation Model
In order to ascertain the impact of organizational climate
on employees work related attitude in IT companies at
Chennai. The relationship between observed variables (a)
such as Internal Process, Human Relations, Open
Systems, Rational Goal, organizational commitment, job
involvement, job satisfaction and unobserved variables
like organizational climate and employees work related
attitude were studied with the help of Akbar-Subramani
Structural Equation Model.

3.1 Variables used in the Structural Equation


Model
3.1.1 Variables used in the Structural Equation Model are
(b)
as follows
Figure 2. (a) SEM model based on unstandardised
Observed endogenous variables are Internal Process,
estimates (b) SEM model based on standardised
Human Relations, Open Systems, Rational Goal, Or-
estimates.
ganizational commitment, Job involvement and Job
satisfaction.
Unobserved, endogenous variables are organizational
3.2 Hypothesis Formulation
climate and Employees work related attitude. The research hypothesis have been defined on the basis
Unobserved, exogenous variables are, e1: Error term of the model fit summary outlined in Table 1 and using
for Internal Process, e2: Error term for Human Rela- previous research on impact of organizational climate on
tions, e3: Error term for Open Systems, e4: Error term employees work related attitude. On the basis of above
for Rational Goal, e5: Error term for Organizational presented model, the following hypothesis is proposed:

4 Vol 9 (2) | January 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology
A. K. Subramani, N. Akbar Jan, H. Moideen Batcha and N. Vinodh

Table 1. Regression weights for employees work related attitude


Measured Latent Variable Unstandardized S.E Standardized t value p value
Variables Co-efficient Co-efficient
Employee Work <--- Organizational climate 1.16 0.086 0.81 13.391 < 0.001**
related Attitude
Internal Process <--- Organizational climate 1.000 - 0.71 - -
Rational Goal <--- Organizational climate 1.38 0.072 0.86 19.005 < 0.001**
Open Systems <--- Organizational climate 0.82 0.047 0.70 17.365 < 0.001**
Human Relations <--- Organizational climate 1.13 0.057 0.71 19.952 < 0.001**
Job Satisfaction <--- Employee work related attitude 2.37 0.116 0.84 20.368 -
Job Involvement <--- Employee work related attitude 0.50 0.074 0.22 6.831 < 0.001**
Organizational <--- Employee work related attitude 1.000 - 0.68 - -
Commitment

H0: Organizational climate is not having impact would increase by 0.82 units for every unit increase in
on employees work related attitude with its various Open systems activities in the IT companies and 1% level
dimensions like organizational commitment, job significant as coefficient value.
involvement and job satisfaction. The coefficient value of Rational Goal is 1.38 which
Table 1 encapsulates regression weights for measured represents the effect on Rational Goal on organizational
and latent variables. From the Table 1, it is identified that climate, holding the other variables as constant. Hence it
the coefficient value for organizational climate is 1.16 estimates a positive sign implies such effect is positive that
which represents effect over employees work related organizational climate would increase by 1.38 units for
attitude holding the other variables as constant. The every unit increase in rational goals, where the coefficient
estimated of positive sign implies that employees work value is significant at 1% level.
related attitude would increase by 1.16 for every unit The coefficient value of organizational commitment
increase in organizational climate in the IT companies is 1.000 which represents the complete effect of
and this coefficient value is significant at 1% level. organizational commitment on employee work related
The coefficient value of organizational climate is 1.000 attitude, holding the other variables as constant. The
which represents the effect over internal process, holding scope of positive sign implies that for every 1.00 unit of
the other variables as constant. The estimated of positive increase in employee work related attitude would increase
indication implies that internal process would increase by 1.000 units in organizational commitment where the
by 1.000 for every unit increase in organizational climate coefficient value is not significant at 5% level.
activities in the IT companies and this coefficient value is The coefficient value of job involvement is 0.50
not significant at 5% level. which represents the partial towards job involvement
Similarly the coefficient value of human relations on employee work related attitude, holding the other
is 1.13 which represents the effect on human relations variables as constant. This estimated of positive sign
towards organizational climate holding other variables implies for every 1.000 unit of increase in employee work
as constant. The estimated positive sign implies that related attitude would increase by 0.50 for every unit
such effect is positive that organizational climate would increase in job involvement with significant at 1% level.
increase by 1.13 units for every unit increase in human The coefficient value of job satisfaction is 2.37 which
relations activities in the IT companies at 1% level of represents the effect on employee work related attitude,
significance. holding the other variables as constant. The estimated
The coefficient value of Open systems is 0.82 which positive sign implies such effect is positive that employees
represents the partial effect of Open Systems towards work related attitude would increase by 2.37 for every unit
organizational climate holding other variables as increase in job satisfaction of the employees those who
constant. Therefore it is projected that positive indication are working in the IT Company, at 1% level significance.
implies such effect is positive that organizational climate Table 2 shows the hypothetical relationship of the

Vol 9 (2) | January 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology 5
Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Empirically Study the Impact of Organizational Climate on Employees Work Related At-
titude in Information Technology Organizations in Chennai City

Table 2. Result of hypotheses


Hypothesis Hypothetical Result
relationship
There is no significant causal relationship between organizational climate and employees work related Positive Rejected
attitude
There is no significant causal relationship between Human relations and organizational climate Positive Rejected
There is no significant causal relationship between Internal Process and organizational climate Positive Rejected
There is no significant causal relationship between behavioural change and organizational climate Positive Rejected
There is no significant causal relationship between Rational Goal and organizational climate Positive Rejected
There is no significant causal relationship between job satisfaction and employees work related attitude Positive Rejected
There is no significant causal relationship between organizational commitment and employees work Positive Rejected
related attitude
There is no significant causal relationship between job involvement and employees work related attitude Positive Rejected

Table 3. Model fit summary


S. Test Factor Value Suggested Value
No
1. CMIN or Chi Square Value 2.170 Range from as high as 5.024to as low as 2.025.
2. P value 0.903 > 0.0526
3. GFI (Goodness of Fit Index)) 0.999 >0.9027
4. RMR (Root Mean Square Residuals) 0.041 <0.08 27
5. RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation) 0.000 <0.08 27
6. AGFI (adjusted Goodness of Fit Index) 0.998 >0.9028
7. CFI (Comparative Fit Index) 1.000 > 0.9029
8. TLI (Tucker-Lewis Index) 1.000 > 0.9529,30
9. NFI (Normed Fit Index) 0.999 > 0.9529,30

variables tested and its result. From the Table 2, it is 4. Results and Discussions
found that the all the measured variables organizational
climate, organizational commitment, job involvement The various human relationships are represented as below:
and job satisfaction are having positive association with H1: There is significant causal relationship between
the employees work related attitude with respect to the organizational climate and employees work related
selected IT companies. attitude.
Table 3 summarizes the model fit summary based on H2: There is significant causal relationship between
absolute indices and incremental fit indices. From the human relations and organizational climate.
Table 3, it is found that CMIN value which is 2.17024,25 H3: There is significant causal relationship between
internal process and organizational climate.
and the calculated p value is 0.903, which is greater than
H4: There is significant causal relationship between
0.0526 which indicates Null hypothesis is accepted (i.e.
Open system and organizational climate.
Model is fit). Here GFI (Goodness of Fit Index) value27 and
H5: There is significant causal relationship between
also it is found that RMR (Root Mean Square Residuals) Rational Goal and organizational climate.
value is 0.04127 and RMSEA (Root Mean Square Error of H6: There is significant causal relationship between
Approximation) value is 0.000, which is less than 0.0827 job satisfaction and employees work related attitude.
indicates good fit. AGFI (Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index)28 H7: There is significant causal relationship between
value are greater than 0.9 which represents it as a good fit. organizational commitment and employees work re-
The calculated CFI (Comparative Fit Index) value is 1.00029 lated attitude.
which indicates absolute fit The TLI (Tucker-Lewis Index) H8: There is significant causal relationship between
and NFI (Normed Fit Index) values also greater than 0.95 job involvement and employees work related attitude.
which indicates the model is good fit29,30. From the path analysis, it is found from the result

6 Vol 9 (2) | January 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology
A. K. Subramani, N. Akbar Jan, H. Moideen Batcha and N. Vinodh

of hypothesis that all the measured variables Human ior in experimentally created Social climates. Journal of
relations, Internal process, Open systems, Rational goal, Social Psychology. 1939; 10(2):26999.
7. Tagiuri R, Litwin G. Organizational climate: Exploration of
Job satisfaction, organizational commitment and job
a concept. Boston, Harvard University Press: 1968.
involvement are having positive association with the latent 8. Litwin GH, Stringer RA. Motivational and organizational
variables organizational climate and employees work climate: Graduate School of Business Administration. Bos-
related attitude in the selected IT companies. Structural ton, USA, Harvard University Press: 1968.
Equation Modeling was used to test the conceptual model. 9. Meyer J, Allen N. Commitment in the workplace: Theory,
The conceptual model developed was found to be fit. research and application. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publi-
cations: 1997.
10. Kanungo RN. Measurement of job and work involvement.
5. Conclusion Journal of Applied Psychology. 1982 Jun; 67(3):3419.
11. Mudrack PE. Job involvement, obsessive-compulsive
personality traits and workaholic behavioral tendencies.
In hyper competitive world, organizations are like finger
Journal of Organizational Change Management. 2004;
prints which are always unique. Each has its own culture, 17(5):490508.
traditions and methods of action which in their totality 12. Lodahl T, Kejner M. The definition and measurement of
constitute its climate. This study examines the framework job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology. 1965 Feb;
of employees perception towards organizational climate 49(1):2433.
and its impact on employees work related attitude in IT 13. Dimitriades ZS. The influence of service climate and job in-
volvement on customer-oriented organizational citizenship
sector. The findings also reveal that the organizational behavior in Greek service organizations: A survey. Employ-
climate is having positive impact on employees work ee Relations. 2007; 29(5):46991.
related attitude and its components such as job satisfaction, 14. Carson KD, Carson PP, Bedeian AG. Development and
organizational commitment and job involvement. So construct validation of a career entrenchment measure.
from the research, it is proved that the compassionate Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
1995 Dec; 68(4):30120.
organizational climate cultivate the positive attitudinal
15. Cohen A. An examination of the relationships between
outcomes for the employees and overall development for work commitment and nonwork domains. Human Rela-
the organizations as well. tions. 1995 Mar; 48(3):23963.
16. Dubrin A. Personnel and human resources management.
Newyork, D. VanNostrand Co.: 1981. p. 236.
6. References 17. Hamner TJ, Organ F. Organization behaviour: An applied
psychological approach. Canada, Business Publications:
1. Dyer L, Ericksen J. Dynamic organizations: Achieving 1978.
marketplace agility through workforce scalability(CAHRS 18. Smith PC. The measurement of satisfaction in work and re-
Working Paper #06-12). Ithaca, NY, Cornell University: tirement. Chicago, Illinois, Rand McNally and Company:
2006. 1910. p. 37.
2. Raman R, Vijayakumar Bharathi S, Sesha V, Joseph S. Use 19. Locke EA. The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In
of structural equation modeling to empirically study the M.D. Dunnette (Editor). Handbook of Industrial and Or-
turnover intentions of Information Technology profession- ganizational Psychology, Chicago; Rand McNally: 1976. p.
als in Pune City. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 1297343.
2013 Dec; 6(12):561224. 20. Oshagbemi T. Gender differences in the job satisfaction of
3. Kim D, Jung J, You Y, Kim C.The influence of the process of university teachers. Women in Management Review. 2000;
creating organizational culture on organizational commit- 15(7):33143.
ment and job involvement. Indian Journal of Science and 21. Top 20 Players in IT industry. Available from: http://www.
Technology. 2015 Apr; 8(S7):38393. nasscom.in/industry-ranking Date assessed:
4. Holloway JB. Leadership behavior and organizational cli- 22. Litwin GH, Stringer RA. The influence of organizational
mate: An empirical study in a non-profit organization. climate. Boston, MD, Harvard University Press: 1966.
Emerging Leadership Journeys. 2012; 5(1):935. 23. Traynor M, Wade B. The development of a measure of job
5. Noruzy A, Shatery K, Rezazadeh A, Hatami-Shirkouhi L. satisfaction for use in monitoring the morale of community
Investigation the relationship between organizational jus- nurses in four trusts. Journal of Advanced Nursing.1993 Jan;
tice, and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediat- 18(1):12736.
ing role of perceived organizational support. Indian Journal 24. Wheaton B, Muthen B, Alwin DF, Summers G. Assessing
of Science and Technology. 2011 Jul; 4(7):8427. reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Meth-
6. Lewin K, Lippit R, White RK. Patterns of aggressive behav- odology. 1977 Jan; 8(1):84136.

Vol 9 (2) | January 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology 7
Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Empirically Study the Impact of Organizational Climate on Employees Work Related At-
titude in Information Technology Organizations in Chennai City

25. Tabachnick, BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 29. Hu L, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure mod-
Boston, Pearson/Allyn and Bacon: 2007. p. 1204. eling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspeci-
26. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate fication, Psychological methods, American Psychological
data analysis (5th Edition). New Jersey, Prentice-Hall Inter- Association. 1998 Dec; 3(4):42453.
national, Inc.: 1998. 30. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness
27. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham R. Multi- of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological
variate data analysis (6th Edition). Uppersaddle River, N.J., bulletin. American Psychological Association. 1980 Nov;
Pearson Prentice Hall: 2006. p. 1725. 88(3):588606.
28. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M. Structural equation
modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron-
ic Journal of Business Research Methods. 2008; 6(1):5360.

8 Vol 9 (2) | January 2016 | www.indjst.org Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi