Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 4

Compare conversation and restoration techniques applied in two Australian

maritime archeological projects

Conservation: Saving or preserving to prevent further deterioration. Involves


preserving and stabilizing an artifact
Restoration: Restoring an artifact as close as possible to its original condition.

The below Maritime projects were not necessarily restored, and in most
conversation projects, restoration is not applied. This is because restoration
often damages the representation of an artifact, in which significant
engravings; markings and historical aspects of the artifact can become
removed. Usually, the wear and tear of an artifact will more accurately
reveal its history than an attempt to restore it.
1.

HMB Endeavour Canons SS Xantho Engine


Cooks Endeavour ran aground in 1770 on the Paddle steam boat constructed in 1848
Great Barrier Reef Sank in Port Gregory in 1872
Six of ten iron cannons were cast overboard to Took over 10 years to stabilize, recover,
reduce weight and refloat the vessel conserve and restore
Canons discovered in 1969 beneath The engine was the only example of a high
concretions of two hundred years of coral pressure mass-produced engine
Recovered and treated by conservators and are
now on display in the Sydney National Conservation / Restoration:
Maritime Museum 1. Aluminium sacrificial anodes attached to the
engine at the wreck site to slow corrosion of
Conservations / Restoration: the engine, allowing a correct, controlled
1. Canons are soaked in a sea water, 10% recovery (Engine weight of 7.5t meant that
formaline solution to remove and kill bacteria recovering process would take an extended
2. Coral (calcium carbonate) is removed period of time)
mechanically with hammers 2. Engine recovered in 1985 and was transported
3. Canons soaked in a 2% NaOH solution to to the Maritime Museum of Western Australia
passivate the surface of the iron 3. Engine lowered into a sodium carbonate /
4. Canons are then electrolyzed in the NaOH sodium hydroxide solution to passivate the
solution at a current density of 10A/m2. The iron surface. This occurred for nine years with
canon is made the cathode and mild steel is regular washing and electrolyte replacement
made the anode. 4. Engine periodically removed to mechanically
The solution was replaced at regular intervals remove concretions using hammers (and a
until the concentration of chloride ions stabilized pneumatic needle was required for harder
at 20ppm concretions)

5. Canon placed in a low concentration chromate Note: Only the iron had undergone sever corrosion;
solution (8.7 x10-3M) to remove chlorides and brass fittings only suffered minor corrosion. Also, the
hydroxides, and to promote the passivation of cast iron surfaces were cathodically protected due to
the iron with an iron oxide / chromic oxide high graphite levels in the cast iron. However, this
layer meant that the wrought iron became sacrificial anodes
6. Canon dried for two days at 120C and then and were completely oxidized away
immersed in microcrystalline wax (as a
further protective layer) for five days, at 5. A connecting rod of the engine was treated
135C to ensure maximum penetration of wax with hydrogen furnace reduction in which iron
7. EDTA treatment applied to reverse the chlorides were reduced to iron metal with high
damage done by the hydrolysis of metallic temperature hydrogen gas
chlorides (several months to complete) 6. An oxy-acetylene torch removed internal
concretion from the engine and some sections
had to be removed for soaking and electrolytic
treatment, for restorative purposes and to
remove chloride contamination
7. Vapour-phase inhibitors were added to protect
and conserve internal surfaces
8. All exposed surfaces were covered in a
microcrystalline wax for preservations

Comparison: Points Of Similarity and Points of Contradiction


2.
Whilst the Endeavour canons required electrolytic cleaning due to their poorly
corroded condition, the Vernon anchors did not. Additionally, the canons
required many stages and steps of treatment (stabilization, removal of
concretions, electrolysis and surface protection) whilst the anchors only
required to steps (removal of concretions and surface protection). This
demonstrates how differing artifacts, materials, times of exposure and oceanic
conditions require different, and possible more extensive, forms of treatment.

HMB Endeavour Engines Vernon Anchors


Cooks Endeavour ran aground in 1770 on Constructed in 1839 as a reformatory for
the Great Barrier Reef wayward and orphaned boys
Six of ten iron cannons were cast overboard After their use on the Vernon, the anchors were
to reduce weight and refloat the vessel used for mooring on other vessels
Canons discovered in 1969 beneath During the 1980s it was suggested that the
concretions of two hundred years of coral Anchors be preserved as a memorial to deceased
Recovered and treated by conservators and sailors
are now on display in the Sydney National
Maritime Museum Conservation / Restoration:

Conservations / Restoration: 1. Surface corrosion and remains of protective


paint removed by blasting (smoothing of rough
1. Canons are soaked in a sea water, 10% surfaces) with copper slag
formaline solution to remove and kill 2. Anchor desalinated using 0.5M sodium
bacteria hydroxide solution
2. Coral (calcium carbonate) is removed 3. Iron treated with zinc epoxy paint to prevent
mechanically with hammers further corrosion (cathodic protection and
3. Canons soaked in a 2% NaOH solution to passivation)
passivate the surface of the iron 4. Timber components are saturated with zinc
4. Canons are then electrolyzed in the NaOH napthenate solution as a biocide and to prevent
solution at a current density of 10A/m2. The growth of damaging organisms
canon is made the cathode and mild steel is 5. The anchors are currents on display in the
made the anode. Western Australian National Maritime Museum,
The solution was replaced at regular and are supported with aluminium mesh
intervals until the concentration of chloride (cathodic protection)
ions stabilized at 20ppm
Electrolytic cleaning was not applied to the
5. Canon placed in a low concentration anchors because it required the removal of the
chromate solution (8.7 x10-3M) to remove timber stocks (which would cause unnecessary
chlorides and hydroxides, and to promote the damage) and also because the cast iron was in
passivation of the iron with an iron oxide / sufficiently good condition for preservation.
chromic oxide layer
6. Canon dried for two days at 120C and then
immersed in microcrystalline wax (as a
further protective layer) for five days, at
135C to ensure maximum penetration of
wax
7. EDTA treatment applied to reverse the
damage done by the hydrolysis of metallic
chlorides (several months to complete)

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi