Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 13

2

The Influence of Hospital Brand Image and Service Quality on the Patients
Loyalty Which IsMediated by the Patients Satisfaction at
Qadr Hospital in Tangerang

Eni Trismiati
Graduate Program in Management Masters Degree at Esa Unggul University
Jakarta
enitrismiatisularso@yahoo.co.id

Abstract
Brand image and service quality are crucial for hospitals to make patients feel
satisfied with the services provided, which will eventually improve the patients
loyalty. The formulation of the problem in this study is to find out whether
hospital's brand image, service quality and patients satisfaction influence
patients loyalty. This research aims to determine the effects of hospital brand
image and service qualityon patients loyalty mediated by the patients
satisfaction in outpatient hospital units of Qadr Hospital Tangerang. The design of
this research is explanatory research. The population in this study are outpatients
treated at the Qadr Hospital with a sample of 150 respondents. Sampling
technique used is accidental sampling method. The data quality testing
used Factor Analysis for validity test and Cronbach's Alpha for reliability
test. The collected data is processed by using SEM (stuctural Equation
Model) which is operated by lisrel 8.3 software as a tool of analysis. The results
show that hospital brand image has a significant and positive effect on patients
satisfaction, brand image has a significant influence and positive impact on
patients loyalty, service quality has a significant and positive effect on Patients
Satisfaction, Service quality has a significant and positive influence on patients
loyalty, and Patients Satisfaction has a significant and positive impact on
patients loyalty. In conclusion, it is proven in this study that hospital brand image
and good quality service can improve patients satisfaction and loyalty. It is
recommended that the management of Qadr Hospital improve the hospital brand
image and service quality so that both can have an impact on patients satisfaction
and increase patients loyalty.

Keywords : Hospital Brand Image, Service quality, and Patients Satisfaction


Patients Loyalty

1
2

INTRODUCTION quality and patients


Loyalty is one important satisfaction. Thomas, S (2011),
thing that every company has to tested the Influence ofservice
build to win the quality onthe Customers
competition. According to Reicheld Satisfaction using Brand Image as
and Sasser in Suhartanto, 5% the intermediary variable. From his
increase in customer retention can research, it is proven that service
increase profits by 25% to 85%, and quality does give a significant and
60% increase in sales to new positive effect on patients
customers is on the recommendation satisfaction and brand image.
of customers who are loyal to the This study is a replication of
company. a previous study by researcher Chan
Although it is not too much Chao Wu, titled The Impact Of
different from the product, a brand Hospital Brand Image on service
gives a significant impact because quality, patients satisfaction and
itserves as a marker of a service, loyalty.The writer modified the
which distinguishes it from the previous study to find out how the
services provided by other service influence of brand image and service
providers (Rahma, in Thomas quality are to the patients
S. Kaihatu). Therefore, the customer loyalty,through the patients
will always take into account satisfaction in Qadr Hospital.
a brand, especially in the hospital
industry, in theiroverall THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
considerations to identify whether Brand image
the service quality provided by a Brand image is a set of
hospital can give them higher customers confidence in a particular
satisfaction. brand (Kotler and
Hospital brand image attracts Armstrong). According to Supranto
the attention of conceptual model and Limakrisna, brand image is what
researchers intending to identify the customers think and feel when they
important role ofbrand Image on hear or see a brand and what
patients satisfaction and patients customers learn about the
loyalty. This research refers to a brand. Brand image is also called a
research conducted by Wu whotested schematicmemory brand, containing
hospital brand image, Service the interpretations of the target
quality, Patients satisfaction and market on the product characteristics,
loyalty. product benefits, usage situation and
Wu (2009) tested hospital marketing characteristics. Another
brand image, Service quality, definition of Brand Image is a set of
patients satisfaction and customers confidence in various
loyalty. Four of the six research brands (Kotler & Armstrong,
hypotheses tested were successfully 2009). While Aaker said that the
proven. The results show that there is brand association is something that
a positive correlation between relates to the brand in the minds of
hospital brand image with patients customers (Aaker, 2010)
loyalty through improved service

2
Good health services must
Service quality meet the following basic
According to requirements (Anwar, 1996): (a)
Parasuraman, et.al in MN nasution: Available and sustainable, meaning
Service quality is a global that the kinds of health services
judgements or attitude concerning needed by the public are not hard to
the superiority of the services find, and is always available in the
performed by comparing customers community at all times; (B)
perceptions and acceptable and reasonable, meaning
expectations. According to Lovelock that it is not contrary to the
and Lauren: Service qualitys is a confidence and trust of the
long-term customers cognitive public; (C) Easily accessible, to
evaluation of the delivery of services achieve good services, the
of a company. Tjiptono and Gregory, distribution of health facilities is very
Berry, Parasuraman in MN Nasution important, so there is no
has identified five groups of concentration of health facilities only
characteristics used in evaluating in certain areas; (D) affordable,
customers service, as follows: (1) meaning that health care costs must
Tangible, in the form of appearance be set in accordance with the
of physical facilities, equipment, peoples economic ability; (E)
personnel and means of Quality, which refers to the degree of
communication; (2) Reliability, the perfection of the health services
ability of health services to provide provided, which on one hand
the promised services immediately satisfies the service users, and on the
and satisfactorily; (3) other hands its arrangement is in
Responsiveness, namely the accordance with the stipulated code
willingness of staff to assist of ethics and standards.
customers and provide responsive
services; (4) Insurance, included in it Patients satisfaction
the ability, courtesy, and According to oliver in MN
trustworthiness performed by the Nasution Customers satisfaction is
staff who are free from danger, risk an after-sale evaluation, on which
or doubt; (5) Empathy, which the perception of the performance of
includes the ease of relationships, selected products meets or
good communication, and exceedspre-sale expectations. If the
understanding of customer needs performance does not meet the
expected perception, dissatisfaction
Health Care Quality occurs, according to Kotler and
Service quality is the best Keller (2009). Meanwhile, according
service that is performed by a person, to Tse and Wilton in Tjiptono and
group or institution that gives Gregory, customers satisfaction is
satisfaction to customers or the the customers responses to the
public and in turn the satisfaction perception evaluation on the
will create customers loyalty to a difference between the initial
person or community / group / expectations and the perceived
institution that provides the services. service after the consumption of the
product. Aditama identifies that purchase. Meanwhile, according to
patients are those treated in Sheth and Mittal in Tjiptono,
hospital. To create patients customers loyalty is customers
satisfaction, Hospitals must create commitment to a brand, stores or
and manage a system to obtain more suppliers, based on a very positive
patients and to retain attitude and is reflected in a
patients. However, the efforts to consistent repeat purchases.
improvethe perfection of satisfaction
to grab customerscan be done in a Hospital
variety of strategies. Hospital is a public
facility that serves as a center for
Loyalty health care, which includes the
Customer loyalty is a repeat prevention and cure for diseases, as
purchase made by a customer for a well as the maintenance,
commitment to a brand or improvement and complete health
company. (Kotler). Mowen and recovery. Based on Law No. 44 of
Minor in Suningsih defines loyalty as 2009 on hospitals, a hospital is a
a condition where the customers health care institution that organizes
have a positive attitude toward a complete personal health services
brand, have a commitment to the that provides inpatient, outpatient
brand, and intend to continue to and emergency health
purchase in the future. Another care. WHO (World Health
definition of loyalty from Organization) explains that hospital
Dhammesta says that customers is an integrated social and medical
loyalty shows a tendency to use a organization that serves as a center
particular brand with a high level of for health care providers, both
consistency. This means that loyalty preventive healing and training
is always associated with customers center and social-biological research.
preferences and actual

Citra
Merek RS
X1 Kepuasan Loyalitas
Pasien Pasien
Y1 Y2
Kualitas
Layanan
X2

HYPOTHESES AND satisfaction. On the basis of the the


RESEARCH MODEL customers (patient) experience, they
Da Silva et al. States that image will providejudgements and an
is correlated with customers evaluation of the overall service
performance of the hospital. Based
on the comparison of the expected Customer loyalty depicts
service qualityand the performed customers commitment to reuse
service quality, customers will leave services needed in the future. High
a positive or negative or even neutral loyalty from the community will
emotions, depending on whether the save some costs for the
customer's expectations are met or hospital. When the service
not.Based on this, the proposed productsrendered by a hospital
hypothesis is as follows: exceed expectations, it will lead to
the patients satisfaction so that the
H 1: Hospital brand image has an customers intention to re-use the
effect on the increase of Patients services will increase. Based on this
satisfaction. hypothesis, the 4th hypothesis is
Marilees and Fry discovered that proposed as follows:
image has a direct effect on H 4: Service qualityhas an affect
loyalty. Image is an obvious on the increase inpatients loyalty.
predictor of customers
loyalty. Good image will form a Patients satisfaction will
public mindset on where to go to get produce a positive impact on the
health services, that when people hospital. If patients are satisfied with
have health problems, they the services provided by the hospital,
accordingly will think of a hospital they will hold a perception that the
based on their experiences or based hospital has given good services to
on the information they have the community. Patients who are
received. The 2nd hypothesis can be satisfied with the serviceswill have
formulated as follows: an increased trust and confidence in
H 2: Hospital brand image has an the hospitals optimum service
affect on the increase of patients provision, so that the patients will
loyalty remain faithful to use the services of
the hospital in the future. Based on
Wu, said that high service this, the 5th hypothesis is proposed
qualityis correlated with high as follows: ,
customers satisfaction. Patients H 5: Patients satisfactionhas an
satisfaction serves as a medium for effect on Patients loyalty
service quality and behavioral
intentions. The quality of health care METHOD
is not just concerned with how Sampling and Data Collection
medical personnel provides services The data collection is
to patients, but also how the patient conducted to obtain data, namely the
feels comfortable with the conditions primary data,to solve the problem. In
and situations that hospitals this study, primary data is obtained
create. Thusthe 3rd hypothesis is put by distributing questionnaires to 150
forward, as follows: respondents. The sampling technique
H 3: Service qualityhas an affect used in this study is Accidental
on the increase ofPatients Sampling.
satisfaction
Measures KMO value is above 0.5, precisely
The research statement has when it is 0.6 to 0.9. KMO value of
six responses which use linkert scale 0.9 indicates a very satisfactory
type, ranging from score 1 for value, while when KMO value is
strongly disagree response to score 6 below0.5, the factor analysis can not
for strongly agree be accepted. From the result of data
response. Statements for the variable validity test conducted, all statements
of the brand image consists of are considered valid and qualified
facilities, comfortable environment, for further test.
confidence in the hospital and the
proper attitudes of the Test Reliability
doctors. Research statements for the Reliability Test is conducted by
variable ofservice qualityrefer to the using Cronbach Alpha test. Of all the
instrument created by data that was tested, all Items in the
Parasuraman et.al which consist questionsare considered very
of tangible, Reliability, reliable.
Responsiveness, Assurance and
Empathy. The research statements on RESULT
patients satisfaction consist of Evaluation Model
satisfaction with hospital services, Measurements (Outer Model)
and research statements forthe In this research, validity and
variableof Loyalty statement consist reliability test on each latent variable
of preferences and intention to return will be conducted,namely; variable
despite relatively high prices. image of Brand, Service Quality,
From all the questionnaires Satisfaction and Loyalty with the
distributed, the data obtained help of lisrel 8.3. Reflexive
showsthat the gender characteristic individual measurement is
of the most respondents was 56.7% considered valid if it has a loading
female, the age characteristic was value() with a measured latent
45.4% between 35-49 years, and the variable 0.5, if one ofthe indicators
educational characteristic was 34.7% has a loadingvalue ()<0.5, the
educated in high school, the work indicator should be dropped because
characteristic was 50.7% working in it would indicate that the indicator is
private sectors, the financing not good enough to accurately
characteristic was 55.3% using measure latent variables. To measure
private financing. Of all respondents, the reliability,the value of Construct
as many as 77.3% respondents Reliability should be (CR> 0.70)
visited Qadr Tangerang Hospital and Variance Extractshould
more than 3 times. be (VE>0.50). If they meet the
requirements, indicators are able to
Validity Test represent the latent variables.
In this study, the validity is The results of structural
tested out using analysisfactor. In the equation path diagram output
factor analysis, if the KMO value is using software lisrel 8.3 are as
below 0.5, the factor analysis can not follow,
be used or accepted. The acceptable
2

Figure 2: T Values
Table 2: The Measurement of Validity and Reliability Model SEM
Standardized
Latent T
Indicator Loading Error CR VE
Variabels Values
Factor
CM1 0.6 0.6 12.3 0.6
Hospital CM2 0.8 0.4 16.5
Brand CM3 0.8 0.4 12.1 0.9
Image CM4 0.8 0.4 15.7
CM5 1.0 0.0 26.0
Tangible 0.8 0.3 17.2 0.6
Reliability 0.8 0.4 15.7
Service
Responsiveness 0.8 0.3 17.8 0.9
quality
Assurance 0.7 0.5 14.9
Emphaty 0.8 0.4 18.1
L1 0.6 0.6 12.2 0.5
Loyalty L2 0.8 0.4 9.3 0.7
L3 0.7 0.5 9.0
Patients
0.8 0.7
satisfaction K1 0.8 0.4 9.0

Based on table above, it can each latent variable can be seen in


be concluded that all indicators have the table above. Based on the result
loading values greater than 0.5 and t of the above table, it can be
value is greater than t table concluded that latent variable of
(1.96). This means that none of the exogenous Hospital brand image and
indicators were dropped and all service quality have AVEvalues of >
indicators are valid to measure latent 0.5 and 0.7. As such, latent
variables. variables of endogenous Loyalty and
In this study, a variable is Patients satisfactionhave AVE
consideredreliable when it has values of > 0.5 and 0.7. Thus, it
a composite reliability value greater can be concluded that the indicators
than 0.7 and has AVE value greater used inthe variablesis sufficiently
than 0.5. Reliability test result of

7
reliable or capable to measure the offit model (Goodness of Fit
contructs. Indices).
The results of Goodnesfit Of
Fit test is as follow: the result of Chi-
Square test on exogenous construct Evaluation of Structural
obtain a value of 1.860, which is Model (Inner Model)
below the value of Chi-Square- Structural model can be
ValueCutt-off 3, RMR 0073, evaluated by looking at the value of
RMSEA = 0.074, GFI = 0.980, AGFI R 2 on endogenous variables and
= 0960 , CFI 0970, NFI = 0990, coefficients of path parameter (path
NNFI = 0990, IFI = 0990, RFI = coeficient parameter). The following
0950. These results indicate that is the hypothesis discussed in this
CONSTRUCTS meet the criteria study:

Table 3: Conclusion on Structural Model


Path T
Hypothesis Description
Coefficient Values
Hospital brand image has an
Hypothesis
influence on the increase in 0.35 9.15
Accepted
H1 patients satisfaction.
Hospital brand image has an Hypothesis
influence on the increase of 0.21 2.75 Accepted
H2 patients loyalty
Service quality has an influence on Hypothesis
0.65 14.74
H3 the increase in Patients satisfaction Accepted
Service quality has an influence on Hypothesis
0.32 2,22
H4 the increase of patients loyalty. Accepted
Patients satisfaction has an Hypothesis
0.51 2.08
H5 influence on patients loyalty Accepted

DISCUSSION path coefficient of 0.65 and t value of


Hypothesis 1, brand image 14.74. Hypothesis 4, Service quality
has a significant influence and has a significant influence and
positive impact on patients positive impact on patients loyalty,
satisfaction, with a path coefficient with a path coefficient of 0.32 and t
of 0.35 and t value of 9.15, and t value of 2.22. Hypothesis 5, Patients
value greater than t table satisfaction has a significant and
(1.96). Hypothesis 2, brand image positive impact on patients loyalty,
has a significant influence and with a path coefficient of 0.51 and t
positive impact on patients loyalty, value of 2.08.
with a path coefficient of 0.21 and t
value of 9.15. Hypothesis 3, Service
quality has a significant and positive
effect on patients satisfaction, with a
The Influence of Hospital Brand and later on increases patients re-
Image onPatients satisfaction visit intention.
Based on the results, it is
understood that the variable of The Influence of Service quality on
Hospital brand image significantly Patients satisfaction
influences and has positive impact on Based on the results of the study,
patients satisfaction in the the data obtained shows that the
Outpatient Unit of Qadr Hospital, variable of sevice quality
Tangerang. This means that the significantly influences and has a
better the brand image of a hospital positive impact on patients
is, the more patients will come as satisfaction in the Outpatient Unit of
they feel satistfied. Qadr Hospital, Tangerang. This
The result above is means that the higher the service
similar to the research conducted by quality is, the greater the patients
Neneng Syamsiah (2009) which satisfaction will be.
states that there is a positive effect of The result supportsthe previous
the brand image on customers research conducted by Thomas. K
perceived value toward the (2011) which discovered that service
hospital. The result of this study also quality proved to give a positive and
has a similar result with the studies significant impact on patients
conducted by Wu (2010) and satisfaction.This study also supports
Thomas (2008). the concept proposed by Zeithtml
and Bitner (1996) which says that
customers satisfaction is influenced
The Influence of Hospital Brand by service quality so that the better
Image onPatients loyalty the service qualityis, the greater the
Based on the results obtained, it costumer satisfaction will be. Wu
can be depicted that a variable (2010) also stated that the service
ofhospital brand image significantly quality is highly correlated with high
influences and has a positive impact customers satisfaction.
on Patients loyalty in Outpatient
Unit of Qadr Hospital, The Influence of Service Quality
Tangerang. This means that the on Patient Loyality
better the brand image hospital is, the Based on the result of the study,
more loyal the patients will be. the data obtained shows that the
This study result is inaccordance variable of service quality
with the study conducted byWu significantly and positively
(2010) which discovered that the affectspatients loyalty in the
brand image of the hospital has direct Outpatient Unit of Qadr Hospital,
and indirect effects on patients Tangerang. This means that the
loyalty.This means that the brand better theservice quality is, the higher
image of the hospital, with an the patients satisfaction will be.
addition of service quality, not only This study is in line with the
directly increasespatients loyalty but research conducted by Wu (2010),
also increase patients satisfaction, the result of which implies that the
service quality improves patients
satisfaction, which in the endof the Patients satisfaction will
day affectspatients loyalty. result in a positive impact on the
hospital. If patients are satisfied with
The Influence of Patients the services provided by the hospital,
satisfaction on Patients loyalty an appreciation that the hospital has
Based on the results of the study, given good services to the
the data obtained shows that the communitywill be created. Patients
variable of patients satisfaction who are satisfied with the services
significantly influencespatients will experience an increase in their
satisfaction and has a positive trust and confidence beleiving that
impact on patients loyalty in the the hospital will provide optimum
Outpatient Unit of Qadr Hospital, services for them so that the patients
Tangerang. This means that the will remain faithful or loyal to the
higher the patients satisfaction, the hospital in the future.
more loyal the patients.

CONCLUSION improvingpatients
Based on data obtained and the satisfaction. Therefore, the Qadr
analysis conducted, it can be hospital should pay very much
concludedas follows: attention to the service quality given
Brand image has a significant to its patients. Service quality has a
influence and positive impact on significant influence and positive
patients satisfaction. The first impact on patients loyalty.This
hypothesis that brand image has an fourth hypothesis that the service
influence on patients satisfactionis quality has an influence on patients
statistically proven. Therefore, to loyaltyis also statistically
improve patients satisfaction, Qadr proven. Good quality services will
Hospital is expected to continue to have an impact on patients
maintain the good brand image of the satisfaction and will contribute to
hospital. Then, the second hypothesis patients retention and loyalty. The
that brand image has a significant hospital profitability will increase
influence and positive impact on along with the increase in patients
patients loyaltyis alsostatistically loyalty.
proven. This suggests that a good Patients satisfaction has a
brand image can increase loyalty, significant influence and positive
which, in the end of the day, will impact on patients loyalty. This fifth
affect the profitability of Qadr hypothesis that the service quality
Hospital. has an influence on patients
Service quality has a loyaltyis statistically proven. Patients
significant influence and positive who are satisfied with the services
impact on patients satisfaction, this will remain faithful to Qadr hospital
third hypothesis that the quality of in the future.
the service has an influence on
patients satisfactionis statistically Managerial Implications
proven. This shows the importance For the managerial
of service quality in implication of the study, the
writerdicovered that this study could It is advisable that Qadr
become an input for the management Hospital Management actively
of the Qadr Hospital, Islamic Village evaluate patients satisfaction,
Tangerang, which will implicate on particularly outpatients,by paying
the managerial policy in accordance attention to questionnaires obtained
with the hospitals priority. as an evaluation tool to find out the
The results could be used as a levels of patients satisfaction. It is
point for consideration and recommendedthat the management
evaluation on the hospital brand immediately respond for
image, service quality, patients improvement if there is a complaint
satisfaction and patients loyalty. In from patients regarding the service
addition to that, the results of this qualityprovided and that the
study can be used to determine management implementcompetency-
factors that can increase a hospital and-capability-based customer
brand image, service quality, relationship strategies in serving the
patients satisfaction and patients customers or patients.
loyalty. It is recommended that the It is also recommended that
management of Qadr Hospital be management pay attention to doctors,
able toimprove the brand image of nurses and other personnels in Qadr
this Islamic-nuanced Hospital in order that they are able to
hospital. Maintaining a good brand provide a quality service in
image can be carried out by accordance with the existing
minimizing errors in running the standards. Doctors and nurses are the
operations of the hospital. In doing frontline service providers and
so, i.e, immediately following up therefore require necessary education
complaints of patients such as dirty and training on a regular basis to
environment, doctorstardinessand improve the service quality provided
others are some of the occurring to patients.
errors. It is also suggested that the
Qadr Hospital Management is hospital management increase
expected to be able evaluate the patients loyalty in Qadr Hospitalby
service qualitygiven to its patients, increasingpatients
particularly outpatients , so that it satisfaction. Patients will feel
can meet or even exceed the patients satisfied when the service received is
expectations. Health facilities as in accordance with the expectations
supporting means of service quality and therefore, strategies to improve
can also be improved by ways of, service quality should be a routine
i.e., re-painting the building to make performed program and
it look brighter and cleaner. In isregularlyevaluated. Then, In order
addition, health tools that support to increase patients loyalty, it is
service qualityshould always be recommended to enhance service
checked regularly so that the excellence and rid factors that pose
products of medical examinationare obstacles in increasing patients
accountable. Medical devices that are loyalty.
already out of date are supposed to
be replaced or updated immediately.
2

REFERENCES Ferdinand, A., 2000, Structural


Equation Modelling in
Anwar, 1996, Maintain Quality Management
Health Care. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Research, Publisher
Harapan Diponegoro University,
Semarang.
Aditama, YT (2002). Hospitals and
Ferdinand. 2006. Management
Customers. Jakarta PPFKM UI
Research
Aaker, David, Brand
Methods. Semarang:
Leadership, New York, The Free
Diponegoro University
Press
Publishers Agency
Bendapudi, Neeli and Leonard L.
Griffin, Jill. 2002. Customer Loyalty
Berry, 1997. "Customer's
How to Earn It, How to Keep
Motivation for Maintaining
It. Kentucky: Mc.Graw-Hill.
Relationship with Service
Heriandi. 2007. Quality of Health
Providers," Journal of
Care in Hospitals.
Retailing, Vol. 73, pp.15-37
Hair, JF, Anderson, RE, Tatham, RL,
Bilson Simamora.2002. Aura Brand:
& Black, WC
7 Steps to Building a Strong
1995. Multivariate Data
Brand. Bandung: Jakarta:
Analysis. Fourth
Pustaka Utama PT.Gramedia
Edition. New Jersey: Prentice
Budiastuti, 2002, factors in
Hall.
improving patients satisfaction in
Indarjati (2007) article marketing
hospitals
and service improvement
Christopher Lovelock & Lauren K
strategy. Yogyakarta
Wright.2007. Marketing
J.Supranto and Nandan Five
Management
Krishna. 2007. Customer
Services, PT. The index,
Behavior. Discourse Media
Indonesia
Partners, Jakarta.
Chao-Chan Wu, 2011, The impact of
Kotler, Philip and Gary Armstrong,
hospital brand image on
2001, Principles of
service quality, patients
Marketing, Vol 1, Eighth
satisfaction and
Edition, Jakarta, Erland
loyalty, Journal, Feng Chia
Keller, Kevin L, 2003, Strategic
University, Taiwan
Brand Management,
MOH RI, 2009
Building, measuring and
Dharmmesta, BS, "Customer loyalty:
managing brand equity,
a conceptual study as a guide
New Jersey, Prentice Hall
for researchers, Journal
Kotler, Philip and Kelvin Lane
ejonomi and Bisnis Indonesia, 1999
Keller, 2009. Marketing
Fandy, Tjiptono and Gregory
Management. 13. Issue
Chandra.2005. Service,
Volume 1, Jakarta: Erland
Quality &
Lukman, 2004, Service Quality
Satisfaction, Publisher Andi,
Management , Jakarta, STIA LAN,
Yogyakarta.
Press

12
Nasution, MN, 2004 Integrated Diponegoro University,
Services Management , Publisher Semarang
Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor Thomas, SK, 2012, the Customers
Rahma, ES 2007. Analysis of Effect satisfaction Influenced by
of Service Quality and Brand the Service Quality Brand
Image on Purchase Interests Image As Variable
and Its Impact on Purchase Intermediary: A Case Study
Decision , Semarang, on Customer Private
Diponegoro University Hospital in Surabaya ,
Suhartanto, D, 2001, the Customers Journal, Petra Christian
satisfaction: Effect on University, Surabaya
PrilakuKonsumen , Tjiptono, F. 2008. Marketing
Entrepreneurs No. 107 Strategy . Third Edition. Yogyakarta:
Suningsih, "Analysis of the effect of Andi.
service quality and Widajat, Rochmanadji. 2009, Being
satisfaction to loyalty a great and sustainable
Patient" UIN Jakarta 2009 Hospital , Jakarta: Gramedia
Sugiyono, 2012, Understanding Pustaka General
Qualitative Research , Bandung, Woods, RH, & King, JZ
Alphabeta 2002. Leadership and
Sugiyono, 2008, Qualitative Management in the
Research Methods Hospitality Industry (2nd
Kunatitatif and R & ed.)
D . Bandung Alfabeta. Yunita Dwi Setiyowati,, Effect of
Syamsiah, N, 2009, Analysis of Brand Image for interest in
Factors Affecting Customer returning patients to utilize
Perceived Value For the Outpatient Health
Creating Customers Care Organizations, 2013
satisfaction In Hospital Yacobalis (2001: 61) Service quality
Dr. Kariadi, Journal, and Satisfaction , Erland, Jakarta.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi