the scene starts with all the attendance sitting on opposite sides waiting for the judge to enter

the court while the plaintiff ,defender and

lawyers stays in the middle of the court sitting in front of the judge .. Seconds later the judge enters the court and everyone stands up as
respect for his attendance and back to their respected seats and the judgmental conversation begin around the topic.

Opening
Opening announcement given by bailiff as follows:
All rise! The Christian Court is now in session , Judge presiding.
the judge enters makes the announcement, proceed with the welcome and introduction.
Please be seated. Welcome to the Christian County Court. I am Judge ( ) and this a religious bench trial.
Call Case for Trial
Open the proceedings by stating:
The Court calls cause (plaintiffs name) versus (defendants name).
Is the plaintiff ready?
Is the defendant ready?
Both sides announce ready for trial
The judge asks the plaintiff : yes sir would u plz explain us the matter against the defender who was called by
you?

Plaintiff: I promise I would say nothing but the truth . (the defender) is teaching and shaking people belief with the
de Vince code saying that Jesus is nothing and the bible is just statements and not true ( prezie plays the slide for de Vince
code).

The judge : what does the defender say about that ?

The defender : your honor , I promise I would say the truth . yes what he is saying is true but if he has anything
else to make me false ! let him just say it.

The plaintiff: yes I have .. the bible was written in the first century and was mainly made out of scripts made of
Latin that all was talking about Jesus and his life we as well have the four gospels that was written by Mathew,
mark , Luke , john about the news of the coming of the Kingdom of God .

The defendant lawyer : objection !....what proofs the reliability of the four gospels they were just scripts lost in
translation over years with no evidence of their reliability as dark brown said ,

The plaintiff lawyer: raises his hands and says can I reply the gospel of Marcos was written at 50 ad and last
bible was written in 90 ad which included many names of kings and commanders of army that existed and were
well known by that time ( the lawyer moves to the middle and faces the attendance and continues his speech ) as well the scripts
were written by eye witnesses that not only was Christians but as well new believers not only but also the scripts
included offense to Jesus Christ and failure to apostles that wouldnt have been included if it was just a fake
religion to be established .

One of the attendance raises the hands and asks the judge to speak.

The judge : yes mrs/mr what do u want to say and plz use appropriate words to clarify your view..

The attendance stands up and starts speaking sarcastically: well ! not bad what they included so far but what
would they say about the skeptic believes of taking bible literally that could be dangerous as many biblical
statements mentioned.

Other attendant stand up without permission and say: yes , like the if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out.
It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye, rather than having two eyes, to be cast into hell fire
or the one that state women should not speak in church or yeah the one that says I am the lord and you are sleeves
worship me .
The attendance began to gossip and the court began losing control meanwhile the judge stands up hitting the table to stop the people and after the
silence was present again the judge asked for a priest and one of the attendance would come up as him.

The judge : I want your answer to end that ..

The priest: it was true that all that was said in the bible but it wasnt meant to be taken this way like plucking the
eye was meant to repent than to be burnt in hell and the one about women was said at a time were women mind
were seat in a wrong way and couldnt be priests as men ..

The judge :which we have till today !

The priest : yes, as well Jesus didnt command us to be sleeves ,there were no sleeves by that time ,as well many
statements were told at a stage that people of that time could understand which why people nowadays blame bible
is not modern and stopped following it however not only because that were meant by meaning it should not be
taken literally but many other were meant directly like love each other.

Everyone freeze and will get to the slide in prezie that says where does that leave us and will show the solution !

End