Thermal expansion of pipe-in-pipe systems

© All Rights Reserved

9 vues

Thermal expansion of pipe-in-pipe systems

© All Rights Reserved

- Loads in RISA-3D Webinar
- Aquarius+uPVC+Product+Catalogue
- Stainless - OD Pipe - Douglass
- Piping Solutions Eng
- Tutorial - Soil Overburden and Seismic Wave Propagation in AutoPIPE
- IR-933R-1
- Josam
- CI-245_Micro-Lok® HP Brochure
- G820_04_2006
- Sur_erect- Boq- Prefa- Pi- Pip- Rev A
- 126717676 Tank Heat Calculation
- Heat Transfer. Cooling a Pipe Filled With Water
- CT Conduccion Ejemplos
- Pds 15 Plem Rev021
- alfie cv
- Reinforcement of Welded Branches
- Rapp-It QRF
- 06a+bell_Delaware+method_st
- KOPOS - Metalic Junction Boxes
- Ahura Piping Training

Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 27

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/245185556

pipe systems

DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2004.12.002

CITATIONS READS

5 374

1 author:

A. Bokaian

23 PUBLICATIONS 640 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related

projects:

All content following this page was uploaded by A. Bokaian on 03 October 2015.

ARTICLE IN PRESS

www.elsevier.com/locate/marstruc

A. Bokaian

PCL, 42 Southwood Close, Worcester Park, Surrey KT4 8QH, UK

Received 6 June 2003; received in revised form 7 September 2004; accepted 7 December 2004

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive mathematical model for the thermal expansion of

pipe-in-pipe and bundle systems that are used in the offshore oil and gas industry. The inner

pipe and the outer pipes are assumed to have structural connections through bulkheads at

extremities and spacers or centralisers to prevent contact of the inner and the outer pipes. The

aim is to calculate the displacement and forces on the bulkheads and axial force in the inner

pipe.

In addition to protective pipe-in-pipes, short and long pipe-in-pipes are dened and the

limits between the two are clearly delineated. Analytical methods are extended to study the

effects of exponential temperature gradients along both the inner and the outer pipes, the pipe-

in-pipe length, tie-in spoolpieces, inner pipe weight, seabed and spacer friction and relative

axial stiffness of the inner and the outer pipes on the thermal expansion characteristics. The

iterative approach to solve thermal expansion characteristics proposed can be replaced by

analytical calculation in most practical situations. Simple analytical formulae are suggested

when the outer pipe temperature is constant. Analytical solutions indicate good agreement

with nite element numerical results.

r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Pipe-in-pipe; Bundle; Thermal expansion; Carrier pipe; Jacket pipe; Inner pipe; Outer pipe

E-mail address: bokaian@hotmail.com.

0951-8339/$ - see front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2004.12.002

ARTICLE IN PRESS

476 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

Nomenclature

Ac outer pipe steel cross-sectional area

Ap inner pipe steel cross-sectional area

Dc outer pipe nominal outer diameter

Dp inner pipe nominal outer diameter

Ec Youngs modulus of elasticity of outer pipe

Ep Youngs modulus of elasticity of inner pipe

Fs tie-in spool friction force (symmetric expansion)

Fs1 upstream tie-in spool friction force

Fs2 downstream tie-in spool friction force

L pipe-in-pipe length

Lo limit length between short and long pipe-in-pipe

L1 length at upstream end over which spacers friction act

L2 length at downstream end over which spacers friction act

Nc force in outer pipe (symmetric expansion)

Nc1 force in outer pipe at upstream bulkhead location

Nc2 force in outer pipe at downstream bulkhead location

NT,p1 thermal force in inner pipe at upstream end

NT,p2 thermal force in inner pipe at downstream end

NE end cap force on bulkhead

NE,p end cap force on inner pipe

Neff,p effective axial force in inner pipe

NT,c thermal force on outer pipe (symmetric expansion)

Ntot,p total force in inner pipe

NT,p thermal force in inner pipe

NT,p1 thermal force in inner pipe at upstream end

NT,p2 thermal force in inner pipe at downstream end

Nn,c force due to Poissons effect in outer pipe (symmetric expansion)

Nn,p force due to Poissons effect in inner pipe (symmetric expansion)

N d; force in inner pipe due to displacement of bulkheads

pd,p inner pipe internal design pressure

pamb outer pipe external hydrostatic pressure

pans annulus pressure

Ta ambient temperature

Td,c outer pipe design temperature

Td,p inner pipe design temperature (symmetric expansion)

Ti,c inlet temperature of outer pipe

Ti,p inlet temperature of inner pipe

To,c outlet temperature of outer pipe

To,p outlet temperature of inner pipe

Tz,c temperature in outer pipe at distance z from inlet

Tz,p temperature in inner pipe at distance z from inlet

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 477

tp inner pipe wall thickness

Wpip submerged weight of pipe-in-pipe

Wp weight of inner pipe in air

x anchor length (symmetric expansion)

x1 anchor length at upstream end

x2 anchor length at downstream end

z distance measured from bulkhead

n Poissons ratio of steel

a thermal expansion coefcient of steel

bc decay constant for outer pipe temperature prole

bp decay constant for inner pipe temperature prole

f soil friction strain in outer pipe (symmetric expansion)

E end cap strain

dtot total displacement (symmetric expansion)

dtot1 total displacement at upstream end

dtot2 total displacement at downstream end

d1 ; d2 upstream and downstream bulkhead displacement, respectively

sh;c hoop stress in outer pipe

sh;p hoop stress in inner pipe

c outer pipe tensile strain

n;p strain in inner pipe due to Poissons effect

n;c strain in outer pipe due to Poissons effect

net net strain in outer pipe (symmetric expansion)

net1 net strain in outer pipe at upstream end

net1a net strain in outer pipe at upstream end in rst segment

net1b net strain in outer pipe at upstream end in second segment

net2 total net strain in outer pipe at downstream end

T;c thermal strain in outer pipe (symmetric expansion)

T;p thermal strain in inner pipe (symmetric expansion)

tot total strain in pipe-in-pipe (symmetric expansion)

tot1 total strain in outer pipe at upstream end

tot2 total strain in outer pipe at downstream end

m seabed longitudinal friction coefcient

ms spacer friction coefcient

mo reduced longitudinal seabed friction coefcient

m1 increased longitudinal seabed friction coefcient

SN T sum of thermal force of inner and outer pipes (symmetric expansion)

SN T1 sum of thermal forces of inner and outer pipes at upstream end

SN T2 sum of thermal forces of inner and outer pipes at downstream end

SN n sum of Poissons forces of inner and outer pipes as dened in text

ARTICLE IN PRESS

478 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

1. Introduction

or owline (sometimes called production or carrier pipe) and a protective

outer pipe (sometimes known as sleeve or jacket pipe) [18]. Insulation material

is applied to the inner pipe to prevent the heat loss [912]. This is done by

placing thermal insulation materials within the annulus of the two pipes. The

outer pipe protects the insulation material from external hydrostatic pressure

and mechanical damage. Pipe-in-pipe insulation dictates that the outer

pipe wall temperature is low, therefore conventional and relatively inex-

pensive corrosion coatings and cathodic protection systems may be employed [9].

Pipe-in-pipe may be installed by reeling [1116] rather than conventional lay

barge.

Pipe-in-pipe systems can be divided into two categories, namely, compliant and

non-compliant systems [5]. The compliant systems have a connection between the

inner and outer pipes at close intervals either every two pipe joints by tulip [1720],

or by donut plate [21]. In this case, the inner and the outer pipes expand uniformly

along the pipeline and load transfer is continuous. In non-compliant systems, the

inner and the outer pipes have structural connections through the bulkheads [1,5].

The bulkheads may either be placed at the pipeline extremities or at discrete

locations, usually at intervals of a few kilometres along the pipeline length to transfer

axial loads. The inner and outer pipes move relative to each other. Water stops may

also be required in the event of a wet buckle to limit sea water ingress within the

annulus [4,11,12].

In addition, in both categories, spacers or centralisers are used to prevent contact

of the inner and the outer pipes [11,12]. The centralisers are used mainly to maintain

the owline concentric within the outer pipe and are typically spaced 13 m apart.

However an alternative system has been used whereby insulation foam is employed

along the pipelines length [4].

This paper is concerned with non-compliant systems and investigates a

structurally symmetric pipe-in-pipe with equidistant regular spacers along its

length and a bulkhead at each end. Some nite element results of pipe-in-pipe

are reported in [5] whilst some limited analytical formulations can be found in

[2123]. This paper presents a complete mathematical model for the bulkhead forces

and axial displacements, inner pipe axial force and outer pipe tension under

temperature variation of both the inner and the outer pipes. The concept of

protective, short and long pipe-in-pipe is dened and investigated in great detail. The

mathematical model presented herein is also of direct relevance to the thermal

expansion of pipeline bundles which generally consist of one or more production

pipes (along with other lines such as heat-up lines and methanol lines) placed

together within a larger diameter pipe (sleeve) with an external insulation layer.

The sleeve in turn is placed into an outer pipe, known as carrier, with spacers

positioned throughout to ensure that inner lines are well kept in position within the

outer pipe [24,25]. A comparison is presented between analytical results and nite

element solutions.

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 479

2. Theory

spoolpieces [2629] at the two ends. This ensures a static point at the centre of the

pipe-in-pipe system, as shown in Fig. 1b. From the force equilibrium on the

bulkhead, the following equality applies:

in which, N T;p is the thermal force in inner pipe, N n;p the force due to Poissons effect

in inner pipe, N E the end cap force on bulkhead, F s the tie-in spool frictional

resistance, N d; the force in inner pipe due to displacement of bulkheads, and N c the

tension force in outer pipe.

Throughout this paper, sufces p and c denote inner pipe and the outer pipe,

respectively.

The thermal force in the inner pipe is calculated as [30,31]:

where, E p is the inner pipe Youngs modulus of elasticity, Ap the inner pipe steel

cross-sectional area, a the coefcient of thermal expansion of steel pipeline, T d;p the

strain

tot

T,c

c

v,c z

net distance along pipe-in-pipe

f

x (anchor length) pote

ntial

displaced

outer pipe bulkhead bulkhead

Nc (outer pipe tension)

spacer

N (inner pipe deflection force)

inner pipe

FS (tie-in spool seabed friction force) Anchor region x (anchor length) (expansion)

seabed friction force on outer pipe

L/2

Fig. 1. Thermal expansion of symmetric pipe-in-pipe system. (a) Strain in outer pipe. (b) Forces on

bulkhead, inner and outer pipes.

ARTICLE IN PRESS

480 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

inner pipe design temperature, and T a the ambient temperature which is assumed to

be equal to installation temperature.

The force in the inner pipe due to Poissons effect is evaluated from [30,31]:

N n;p sh;p Ap n, (2.3)

where, n is the Poissons ratio, and sh;p the hoop stress in inner pipe which is

calculated from [32]:

Dp tp

sh;p pd;p pans (2.4)

2tp

in which, Dp is the inner pipe nominal outer diameter, tp the inner pipe wall

thickness, pd;p the inner pipe internal design pressure, and pans the annulus design

pressure.

The end cap force on the bulkhead is evaluated from the following relationship:

N E pd;p inner area of inner pipe

pans annular area between inner and outer pipes

pamb outer area of bulkhead; 2:5

where, pamb is the outer pipe external hydrostatic pressure.

The end cap force N E is shared by both the inner and the outer pipes in proportion

to the axial stiffness as:

E p Ap

N E;p NE, (2.6)

E p Ap E c Ac

where, N E;p is the end cap force on inner pipe, E c the outer pipe Youngs modulus of

elasticity, and Ac the outer pipe steel cross-sectional area.

The end cap strain is:

NE

E . (2.7)

E p Ap E c Ac

The tie-in spoolpiece frictional resistance F s is obtained by multiplying its

submerged weight by the seabed longitudinal friction coefcient.

The tensile force in the inner pipe can be evaluated from:

N d 2E p Ap d=L (2.8)

where d is the bulkhead displacement (see Fig. 1b), and L the pipe-in-pipe length.

If the outer pipe suffers an increased temperature because of heat convection from

the inner pipe, the thermal strain in the outer pipe may similarly be written as:

T;c aT d;c T a , (2.9)

where T d;c is the outer pipe design temperature.

The hoop stress in the outer pipe is similarly calculated as:

D c tc

sh;c pans pamb , (2.10)

2tc

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 481

where Dc is the outer pipe nominal diameter, tc the outer pipe wall thickness, and

pamb the outer pipe external hydrostatic pressure.

The total strain acting along the outer pipe is dened as (tensile strain positive

otherwise compressive):

tot T;c n;c c , (2.11)

where, T;c is the thermal strain in outer pipe, n;c the outer pipe strain due to

Poissons effect nsh;c =E c ; and c the tensile strain in outer pipe as a result of

bulkhead displacement N c =E c Ac :

As shown in Fig. 1a, the strain in the outer pipe as a result of soil friction f [30,31]

and the net strain net are:

mW pip

f z,

E c Ac

where, m is the longitudinal seabed friction coefcient, W pip the pipe-in-pipe

submerged weight, and z the distance measured from bulkhead.

The anchor length at each end of the pipe-in-pipe system x is obtained by equating

the net strain to:

mW pip Nc mW pip

net tot f tot x T;c n;c x 0. (2.13)

E c Ac E c Ac E c Ac

From the above relationship N c may be rewritten as:

N c mW pip x T;c n;c E c Ac mW pip x N T;c N n;c , (2.14)

where

N T;c E c Ac T;c E c Ac aT d;c T a ; and N n;c E c Ac n;c nsh;c Ac :

(2.15)

The bulkhead displacement d may be written in terms of x as:

Z x Z x

mW pip mW pip 2 mW pip 2

d net dz tot z dz tot x x x .

0 0 E c Ac 2E c Ac 2E c Ac

(2.16)

Rewriting Eq. (2.1) in terms of the above relationships results in an equation for x:

E c Ac L E c Ac

x2 L x N T;p N n;p N E F s N T;c N n;c 0.

E p Ap mW pip E p Ap

(2.17)

Effects of spacer friction: The effects of friction between the inner pipe and the

spacers imposes a compressive distributed force with intensity of ms W p on the inner

pipe (see Fig. 2b) where W p is the weight per unit length of inner pipe in air and ms

the friction coefcient between inner pipe and spacers.

This means in Fig. 1b and Eqs. (2.1) and (2.17), ms LW p =2 should be deducted

from N T;p : Furthermore the above friction force creates a tension in the outer pipe.

ARTICLE IN PRESS

482 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

(Ti,p Ta)

(Ti,p Ta)epz

(To,p Ta)

displaced

bulkhead spacer outer pipe bulkhead

L1 L2

x1 x2

(Td,p Ta)

inner pipe

Fig. 2. Inner pipe temperature variation and spacer friction force. (a) Variable temperature. (b) Constant

temperature.

Its effect can be incorporated in the above formulae by using the reduced seabed

friction coefcient dened as:

ms W p

m0 m 1 . (2.18)

m W pip

Eq. (2.17) may be rewritten as:

E c Ac L E c Ac

x2 L x SN T ms W p L=2 SN n N E F s 0

E p Ap mo W pip E p Ap

(2.19)

in which

SN T N T;p N T;c sum of thermal forces on bulkhead

The solution to Eq. (2.19) may be written as:

q

SN T ms W p L=2SN n N E F s E p Ap

L 1 1 4 m0 LW pip E c Ac

x (2.21)

2 E p Ap =E c Ac

The necessary and sufcient condition for the solution to exist is 0oxpL=2: This

leads to:

F s pSN T ms W p L=2 SN n N E ,

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 483

1=m0 W pip E c Ac =E p Ap SN T SN n N E F s

LXLo 1

, (2.22)

4 E c Ac =2E p Ap 1 ms =m0 W p =W pip

The total force N tot;p and the effective axial force N eff ;p in the inner pipe are:

N tot;p N T;p ms W p L=2 N d N n;p ,

The bulkhead displacement and the inner and the outer pipe forces are simplied

as:

m0 W pip 2 m0 W pip E p Ap 2

d x ; Nd x ,

2E c Ac L E c Ac

Eq. (2.21) delineates the limit between the long and short pipe-in-pipe systems. For

the latter, the forces and displacements based on the anchor length of L=2 will not be

enough to balance the forces on the bulkhead. As a result, an additional amount of

bulkhead displacement must occur to result in a balance of forces on the bulkhead.

The force due to the extra displacement is not inuenced by the soil friction as this is

generating its maximum value m0 W pip L=2 on each side. With reference to Fig. 3a, the

bulkhead displacement and the inner pipe force become, respectively:

Z L=2 Z L=2

m W pip m W pip L L

d net dz tot 0 z dz tot 0 ,

0 0 E c Ac E c Ac 4 2

m0 W pip L

N d E p Ap tot . (2.25)

E c Ac 4

From Eq. (2.11), the strain in the outer pipe may be written as:

c tot T;c n;c . (2.26)

Using the above expressions and substituting N c E c Ac c into Eq. (2.1) leads to:

SN T ms W p L=2 SN n N E F s E p Ap =E c Ac m0 W pip L=4

tot .

E p Ap E c Ac

(2.27)

Based on the above equation d; N d; and the force in the outer pipe at bulkhead

location become:

SN T ms W p L=2 SN n N E F s m0 W pip L=4 L

d ,

E p Ap E c Ac 2

ARTICLE IN PRESS

484 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

strain

tot

net

anchor

upstream point downstream

bulkhead f bulkhead

L /2 L /2

tot

net

anchor

point

x1 L-x1

net

tot

anchor

point

x1 L-x1

Fig. 3. Thermal expansion of short pipe-in-pipes. (a) Uniform temperature. (b) Temperature gradient in

inner pipe. (c) Inner and outer pipe temperature variation.

Nd ,

1 E c Ac =E p Ap

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 485

Nc

E c Ac =E p Ap N T;p ms W p L=2 N n;p N E F s N T;c N n;c m0 W pip L=4

.

1 E c Ac =E p Ap

2:28

In most engineering situations, E p Ap 4E c Ac : However in some cases the

opposite may be true. This happens when the primary purpose of the outer pipe

is to protect the inner pipe from the effects of dropped objects in areas close to

the platforms [33]. For a long protective pipe-in-pipe, the anchor length may be

written as:

SN T ms W p L=2 SN n N E F s

x . (2.29)

m0 W pip

length of the system, as shown in Figs. 2a. The exponential distribution represents a

realistic simulation of the temperature variation in the inner pipe due to heat loss and

may be written as [34,35]:

where, z is the distance measured from inner pipe inlet (upstream end), T i;p the inlet

temperature (at hot end of inner pipe), T z;p the temperature at distance z from inlet,

and bp the heat loss coefcient (decay constant) for inner pipe. bp is a function of the

pipeline and coating conductivity properties, internal uid properties and external

convection and may be written as:

1 T i;p T a

bp ln , (2.31)

L T o;p T a

where, To,p is the outlet temperature (at cold end of inner pipe).

The thermal force in the inner pipe varies from a maximum of N T;p1

E p Ap aT i;p T a at the inlet to a minimum of N T;p2 E p Ap aT o;p T a at the

outlet. The difference is balanced by the frictional forces generated by the spacers on

the inner pipe, as shown in Fig. 2a, according to which:

E p Ap aT i;p T o;p ms W p L2 L1 ,

L1 L2 L, 2:32

where, L1 ; L2 is the upstream and downstream length, respectively, over which two

opposing spacer friction forces act (see Fig. 2a).

ARTICLE IN PRESS

486 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

E p Ap a

L1 L T i;p T o;p 2,

ms W p

E p Ap a

L2 L T i;p T o;p 2,

ms W p

L2 4L1 . 2:33

Throughout this paper, sufxes 1 and 2 refer to the upstream and the downstream

end of the pipe-in-pipe system, respectively.

The equilibrium of forces on the bulkheads results in:

N T;p1 ms W p L1 N n;p N E F s1 N d N c1 0,

where

d1 d2

N d E p Ap . (2.35)

L

By subtracting the above two relationships, the following expression is

obtained:

N c1 N c2 N T;p1 N T;p2 ms W pip L1 L2 F s1 F s2 . (2.36)

For the case of a long pipe-in-pipe system, two cases are considered. Case 1 relates

to L1 4x1 : Case 2 denes the opposite situation of L1 ox1 ; as shown for example in

Fig. 2a.

(a) Long pipe-in-pipe

Case 1 : x1 oL1 In this case, the net strain, the outer pipe force and the bulkhead

displacement at the upstream end become, respectively:

m0 W pip

net1 T;c n;c c1 z; 0ozoL1 ,

E c Ac

m0 W pip x21

d1 . (2.37)

2E c Ac

The anchor point and the bulkhead displacement at the downstream end may

similarly be written as:

m0 W pip

net2 T;c n;c c2 x2 0,

E c Ac

Z x2

m0 W pip 2

d2 net2 dz x . (2.38)

0 2E c Ac 2

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 487

N c2 m0 W pip x2 N T;c N n;c . (2.39)

Substitution of N c1 and N c2 in Eq. (2.36) by their equivalents results in:

N T;p1 N T;p2 ms W p L1 L2 F s1 F s2

x2 x1 (2.40)

m0 W pip

Using Eqs. (2.37) and (2.38), the inner pipe force may be written as:

m0 W pip E p Ap 2

Nd x x22 . (2.41)

2L E c Ac 1

By substituting N d; from Eq. (2.41) and N c1 from Eq. (2.37) into Eq. (2.34) and

making use of Eq. (2.40), the following relationship is obtained for x1 :

E c Ac N T;p1 N T;p2 ms W p L1 L2 F s1 F s2

x21 L x1

E p Ap m0 W pip

L E c Ac

SN T1 SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1

m0 W pip E p Ap

1 N T;p1 N T;p2 ms W p L1 L2 F s1 F s2 2

0, 2:42

2 m0 W pip

where SN T1 N T;p1 N T;c is the sum of thermal forces on the upstream

bulkhead.

For a uniform temperature pipe-in-pipe system but with different tie-in spool

weights, L1 L2 L=2 and the above relationships are simplied as:

F s1 F s2

x2 x1 ,

m0 W pip

E c Ac F s1 F s2 L E c Ac

x21 L x1

E p Ap m0 W pip m0 W pip E p Ap

SN T1 SN n N E F s1 ms W p L=2

1 F s1 F s2 2

0. 2:43

2 m0 W pip

The above solution is valid when x1 oL1 and x1 x2 pL:

Case 2 : x1 4L1 With reference to Fig. 2a, the net strain at the upstream end is:

m0 W pip

net1a T;c n;c c1 z; 0ozoL1 ,

E c Ac

m0 m1 W pip L1 m1 W pip

net1b T;c n;c c1 z; L1 ozox1 , (2.44)

E c Ac E c Ac

ARTICLE IN PRESS

488 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

m Wp

m1 m 1 s . (2.45)

m W pip

The anchor point and the bulkhead displacement at the upstream end are:

m0 m1 W pip L1 m1 W pip

net1b T;c n;c c1 x1 0,

E c Ac E c Ac

Z x1 Z L1 Z x1

d1 net1 dz net1a dz net1b dz

0 o L1

W pip L2 m

m0 3m1 1 m1 L1 x1 1 x21 . 2:46

E c Ac 2 2

From Eq. (2.44), the outer pipe force at the upstream end may be written as:

N c1 m1 W pip x1 m0 m1 W pip L1 N T;c N n;c . (2.47)

Substitution of N c1 from the above equation and N c2 from Eq. (2.39) into Eq.

(2.36) leads to:

m1

x2 x1

m0

N T;p1 N T;p2 ms W p L1 L2 F s1 F s2 m0 m1 W pip L1

,

m0 W pip

|{z}

A

2:48

where A refers to the second term on right-hand side of Eq. (2.48).

Using Eq. (2.48), the inner pipe force becomes:

E p Ap W pip mm1 2 1 m A2

Nd x1 m1 L1 Ax1 m0 3m1 L21 0 . (2.49)

E c Ac L m0 2 2

By substituting N d; from the above and N c1 from Eq. (2.47) into the balance of

forces on the upstream bulkhead of Eq. (2.34), the following equation is obtained for

the calculation of x1 :

mm0 2 E c Ac

x1 m 1 L 1 A L x1

m E p Ap

E c Ac L

SN T1 SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1

E p Ap W pip

1

m0 m1 W pip L1 m0 3m1 L21 m0 A2 0. 2:50

2

The solution is valid when x1 4L1 and x1 x2 pL: Note that m0 m1 2m and

m1 m0 2ms W p =W pip :

(b) Short pipe-in-pipe

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 489

In cases where x1 x2 4L (see Fig. 3b), by equating the anchor point strain at the

downstream end from Eq. (2.38) to that at the upstream end from Eq. (2.44) and by

substituting x2 L x1 ; the following relationship is obtained:

N c1 N c2 W pip m0 m1 x1 m0 L1 L m1 L1 . (2.51)

By equating the above relationship with that of 2.36, the following expression is

obtained for x1 :

N T;p1 N T;p2 ms W p L1 L2 F s1 F s2 mo L2 m1 L1

x1 .

2mW pip 2m

(2.52)

The bulkheads displacements become:

Z x1 Z L1 Z x1

d1 net1 dz net1a dz net1b dz

0 0 L1

2

m0 m1 W pip L1 m m1 W pip L1 m W pip 2

T;c n;c c1 0 x1 1 x,

2E c Ac E c Ac 2E c Ac 1

Z Lx1 Z Lx1

m W pip

d2 T;c n;c c2 0

net2 dz z dz

0 0 E c Ac

2

m0 W pip L m0 W pip L

T;c n;c c2 L T;c n;c c2

2E c Ac E c Ac

m W pip 2

x1 0 x . 2:53

2E c Ac 1

Thus the inner pipe force may be written in terms of x1 and Nc2 as:

E p Ap

Nd d1 d2

L

E p Ap W pip m0 m1 L21 m0 L2 2

mx1 N T;c N n;c N c2 .

E c Ac L 2

2:54

Substitution of N d; in the balance of forces on the downstream bulkhead of Eq.

(2.34) and the subsequent use of Eq. (2.51) result in the following expressions for

N c1 and N c2 :

E c Ac

E p Ap N T;p2 ms W p L2 N n;p N E F s2 W pip 2mx1 m0 L2 m1 L1

N T;c N n;c

N c1

1 EEpc A

Ap

c

n h 2 2

i o

1 m0 L m1 m0 L1

W pip L 2 mx21 2mx1 m0 L2 m1 L1

,

1 EEpc A

Ap

c

ARTICLE IN PRESS

490 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

E c Ac

E p Ap N T;p2 ms W p L2 N n;p N E F s2 N T;c N n;c

W pip =Lm0 L2 m1 m0 L21 =2 mx21

N c2 . (2.55)

1 EEpc A

Ap

c

h i

m0 L2 m1 m0 L21

SN T2 ms W p L2 SN n N E F s2 W pip =L 2 mx21

Nd .

1 E c Ac =E p Ap

(2.56)

In most cases, the temperature in the outer pipe is the almost the same as the

ambient temperature. However if there is any variation, this may similarly be

approximated as (see Fig. 4):

where T i;c is the inlet temperature (at hot end of outer pipe), T z;c the temperature

at distance z from inlet, and bc the heat loss coefcient for outer pipe similarly

strain

tot1

strain

T,c1 tot2

c-1 T,c1

v,c c2

v,c

net1 net2

f

f

pote

ntial

l

ntia

pote

(a) Strain in outer pipe

(To,c Ta)

z

(b) Outer pipe temperature profile

displaced

bulkhead outer pipe bulkhead

spacer inner pipe

1 x1 x2 2

anchor region

L

(c) Thermal expansion

Fig. 4. Pipe-in-pipe expansion under temperature variation. (a) Strain in outer pipe. (b) Outer pipe

temperature prole. (c) Thermal expansion.

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 491

dened as:

1 T i;c T a

bc ln . (2.58)

L T o;c T a

(a) Long pipe-in-pipe

Case 1 : x1 oL1

With reference to Fig. 4(a), the upstream anchor point and bulkhead displacement

are obtained from:

net1 tot1 f T;c n;c c1 f 1 aT i;c T a ebc x1

m W pip

n;c c1 0 x1 0,

E c Ac

Z x1

1 1 m W pip 2

d1 net1 dz aT i;c T a x1 e bc x1

0 x , (2.59)

0 bc bc 2E c Ac 1

where tot1 is the total strain at upstream end, dened similar to Eq. (2.11).

The rst equation may be rewritten as:

N c1 m0 W pip x1 aT i;c T a ebc x1 E c Ac N n;c . (2.60)

With the above relationship, Eq. (2.34) for the equilibrium of forces on the

upstream bulkhead is reduced to:

d1 d2

aT i;c T a ebc x1 E c Ac N T;p1 m0 W pip x1 E p Ap

L

SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1 0. 2:61

T z;c T a T o;c T a ebc z , (2.62)

where z is the distance from inner pipe outlet and T z;c the temperature at distance z

from outlet.

The anchor point and the bulkhead displacement at the downstream end may

similarly be calculated from:

m0 W pip

net2 tot2 f aT o;c T a ebc x2 n;c c2 x2 0,

E c Ac

Z x2

1 1 m W pip 2

d2 net2 dz aT o;c T a x2 e bc x2

0 x ,

0 bc bc 2E c Ac 2

(2.63)

where tot2 is the total strain at downstream end.

From Eq. (2.63), the outer pipe force at the downstream end becomes:

N c2 m0 W pip x2 aT o;c T a ebc x2 E c Ac N n;c . (2.64)

ARTICLE IN PRESS

492 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

d1 d2

aT o;c T a ebc x2 E c Ac N T;p2 m0 W pip x2 E p Ap

L

SN n N E F s2 ms W pip L2 0. 2:65

Substitution of d1 from Eq. (2.59) and d2 from Eq. (2.63) into Eqs. (2.61) and

(2.65) results in the following two relationships in terms of x1 and x2 :

E c Ac m0 W pip 1 x1 bc x1

aT i;c T a ebc x1 x1 aT i;c T a e

E p Ap E p Ap Lbc L

1 x2 bc x2 m0 W pip 2 aT i;c T o;c

aT o;c T a e x x22

Lbc L 2E c Ac L 1 Lbc

N T;p1 SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1

0, 2:66a

E p Ap

E c Ac m0 W pip

bc x2 1 x1 bc x1

aT o;c T a e x2 aT i;c T a e

E p Ap E p Ap Lbc L

1 x2 bc x2 m0 W pip 2 aT i;c T o;c

aT o;c T a e x x22

Lbc L 2E c Ac L 1 Lbc

N T;p2 SN n N E F s2 ms W p L2

0. 2:66b

E p Ap

The above pair of equations can be solved iteratively [36]. The solution is valid

when x1 oL1 and x1 x2 pL:

In most practical cases bc x1 51 and bc x2 51: Based on this, an alternative but

slightly approximate method which simplies the solution to the above equations, is

to expand the exponential terms as [37]:

1

ebc x1 1 bc x1 bc x1 2 ,

2

1

e bc x2

1 bc x2 bc x2 2 . 2:67

2

If the outer pipe temperature rapidly declines to ambient, then the d2 and Nc2 are

simplied as:

m0 W pip 2

d2 x,

2E c Ac 2

The balance of forces on the downstream bulkhead is also simplied as:

d1 d2

SN T2 m0 W pip x2 E p Ap SN n N E F s2 ms W p L2 0,

L

(2.69)

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 493

bulkhead.

The solution is valid when T o:c T a ebc x2 0:

Case 2: x1 4L1

The net strain at the upstream end may be written as:

m0 W pip

net1a aT i;c T a ebc z n;c c1 E c Ac z; 0ozoL1 ;

m0 m1 W pip L1 m1 W pip

net1b aT i;c T a ebc z n;c c1 E c Ac E c Ac z; L1 ozox1 :

(2.70)

The upstream anchor point and bulkhead displacement can be calculated from:

m0 m1 W pip L1 m1 W pip

net1b aT i;c T a ebc x1 n;c c1 x1 0,

E c Ac E c Ac

Z x1 Z L1 Z x1

d1 net1 dz net1a dz net1b dz

0 0 L1

1 1 W pip

aT i;c T a x1 ebc x1 m m1 L21 m1 x21 . 2:71

bc bc 2E c Ac 0

Eq. (2.70) may be rewritten as:

N c1 m1 W pip x1 aT i;c T a ebc x1 E c Ac N n;c m0 m1 W pip L1 . (2.72)

With the above, Eq. (2.34) is reduced to:

d1 d2

aT i;c T a ebc x1 E c Ac N T;p1 m1 W pip x1 E p Ap

L

SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1 m0 m1 W pip L1 0. 2:73

Eqs. (2.63) and (2.65) remain valid for the downstream bulkhead displacement

and balance of forces.

Substitution of d1 from Eq. (2.71) and d2 from Eq. (2.63) into Eq. (2.73) results in

the following expression in terms of x1 and x2 :

bc x1 E c Ac m1 W pip 1 x1 bc x1

aT i;c T a e x1 aT i;c T a e

E p Ap E p Ap bc L L

1 x2 bc x2 W pip

aT o;c T a e m x2 m0 x22 m0 m1 L21

bc L L 2E c Ac L 1 1

aT i;c T o;c

bc L

N T;p1 SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1 m0 m1 W pip L1

0. 2:74

E p Ap

Eqs. (2.66b) and (2.74) can similarly be solved in terms of x1 and x2 : The solution

is valid when x1 4L1 and x1 x2 pL:

(b) Short pipe-in-pipe

ARTICLE IN PRESS

494 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

With reference to Fig 3c, by equating the anchor point strain at the upstream end

from Eq. (2.70) to that at the downstream end from Eq. (2.63), and by substituting

x2 L x1 ; the following relationship is obtained:

N c1 m0 m1 W pip L1 m1 W pip

aT i;c T a ebc x1 n;c x1

E c Ac E c Ac E c Ac

N c2 m0 W pip

aT o;c T a ebc Lx1 n;c L x1 . 2:75

E c Ac E c Ac

N c1 N c2 W pip m0 m1 x1 m0 L1 L m1 L1 (2.76)

which is identical to Eq. (2.51) for uniform temperature. Equating the above

relationship with Eq. (2.36) results in the following equation for x1 :

x1 .

2mW pip 2m

(2.77)

Z x1 Z L1 Z x1

d1 net1 dz net1a dz net1b dz

0 0 0

aT i;c T o W pip L21

1 ebc x1 mo m1

b 2E c Ac

c

m0 m1 W pip L1 m W pip 2

n;c c1 x1 1 x ,

E c Ac 2E c Ac 1

Z x2 Z Lx1

m0 W pip

d2 net2 dz aT o;c T a ebc z n;c c2 z dz

0 0 E c Ac

T i;c T a bc Lx1

aebc L e 1 n;c c2 L x1

bc

m W pip

0 L x1 2 . 2:78

2E c Ac

E p Ap

Nd d1 d2

L

aT i;c T o;c E p Ap W pip m0 m1 L21 m0 L2

E p Ap mx21

Lbc E c Ac L 2

N n;c N c2 . 2:79

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 495

Substitution of N d in Eq. (2.34) and the subsequent use of Eq. (2.76) result in the

following relationships for N c1 and N c2 :

W pip 2mx1 m0 L2 m1 L1 E c Ac aT i;c T o;c =Lbc N n;c

N c1

1 E c Ac =E p Ap

1 2

W pip L m0 L m1 m0 L21 =2 mx21 2mx1 m0 L2 m1 L1

,

1 E c Ac =E p Ap

W pip =Lm0 L2 m1 m0 L21 =2 mx21

N c2 .

1 E c Ac =E p Ap

(2.80)

E c Ac aT i;c T o;c

Lbc N T;p2 ms W pip L2 SN n N E F s2

W pip =Lm0 L2 m1 m0 L21 =2 mx21

Nd . (2.81)

1 E c Ac =E p Ap

It should be noted that the rst quotient in the numerator represents the average

temperature in the outer pipe.

3. Application

The above mathematical model was applied to two pipe-in-pipe systems whose

characteristics are summarised in Table 1. A long pipe-in-pipe of length 11,000 m

and short one of 6000 m are considered. All thermal expansion cases discussed in this

paper are considered. The ndings are tabulated in Tables 2 and 3 along with

corresponding nite element analysis results.

4. Conclusions

Based on simple columb friction between the inner pipe and the spacers, analytical

formulas were developed for thermal expansion of non-compliant pipe-in-pipe

systems. It was concluded that the anchor length ratio increases with both a decrease

in pipe-in-pipe length and an increase in the square root of the resultant force that

tends to displace the bulkhead whereas for a long protective pipe-in-pipe with thin

outer pipe wall thickness, the anchor length is directly proportional to this force.

ARTICLE IN PRESS

496 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

Table 1

Pipe-in-pipe data

(a) Geometric and material properties

Outer diameter Dp mm 273.1

Wall thickness tp mm 14.3

Coating thickness mm 3

Coating density kg/m3 900

Steel Young modulus of elasticity Ep N/m2 2.07 1011

Steel density kg/m3 7850

Poissons ratio of steel n dimensionless 0.3

Coefcient of thermal expansion of steel a 1/1C 11.7 106

Fluid density kg/m3 900

Design pressure pd,p bar 400

1400 Outer pipe

Outer diameter Dc mm 355.6

Wall thickness tc mm 12.7

Coating thickness mm 2.5

Coating density kg/m3 1000

Steel Young modulus of elasticity Ec N/m2 2.07 1011

Mass per unit length of insulation, spacers and kg/m 3

other appurtenances

Spacers friction coefcient ms dimensionless 0.22

Mass of tie-in spoolpiece te 11.52

Annulus design pressure pans bar 1

(b) Environmental and soil data

Water depth m 300

Sea water density kg/m3 1025

Longitudinal seabed friction coefcient m dimensionless 0.6

Ambient (installation) temperature Ta 1C 5

Table 2

Hoop stress

Outer pipe sc MPa 39.4

For short pipe-in-pipe systems, the effect of outer pipe temperature variation on

the inner pipe axial force and outer pipe tension can be replaced by its average over

the pipe-in-pipe length. The inner pipe axial force increases with increase in the

resultant force on the bulkhead.

For the case of exponentially varying outer pipe temperature, iterative methods

should be employed to calculate the thermal expansion characteristics. The iteration

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 497

Table 3

Pipe-in-pipe thermal expansion characteristics

Temperature data

(a) Uniform temperature

Inner pipe design temperature Td,p 1C 95

Outer pipe design temperature Td,c 1C 15

Long pipe-in-pipe

Pipe-in-pipe length L m 11,000

Anchor length x m 4110

Limit between short and long pipe-in-pipe Lo m 8491oL

Inner pipe force N d; kN 521 520.5

Total axial force in inner pipe Ntotal,p kN 1865 1863

Effective axial force in inner pipe Neff,p kN 2588 2584

Outer pipe force at bulkhead location Nc kN 1148 1146

Short pipe-in-pipe

Pipe-in-pipe length L km 6000oLo

Inner pipe force N d; kN 950 954

Total axial force in inner pipe Ntotal,p kN 931 937

Effective axial force in inner pipe Neff,p kN 1653 1658

Outer pipe force at bulkhead location Nc kN 1224 1227

Temperature data

(b) Inner pipe non-uniform temperature outer pipe uniform temperature

Inner pipe inlet temperature Ti,p 1C 95

Inner pipe outlet temperature To,p 1C 85

Outer pipe design temperature Td,c 1C 15

Long pipe-in-pipe

Pipe-in-pipe length L km 11,000

Heat loss coefcient bp 1/m 1.071 105

Limit between short and long pipe-in-pipe(1) Lo m 7760oL

Upstream length over which spacers friction acts L1 M 4803

Reduced friction coefcient mo dimensionless 0.4

Results dimensionless Analytical Finite element

Anchor length at downstream end x2 Mm 3158 3154

Bulkhead displacement at upstream end d1 mm 1471 1469

Bulkhead displacement at downstream end d2 mm 703 700

Inner pipe force N d; kN 476 472

Outer pipe force at upstream bulkhead location Nc1 kN 1331 1328

Outer pipe force at downstream bulkhead location Nc2 kN 768 765

ARTICLE IN PRESS

498 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

Table 3 (continued)

Short pipe-in-pipe

Pipe-in-pipe length L km 6000oLo

Heat loss coefcient bp 1/m 1.963 105

Upstream length over which spacers friction acts L1 m 2303

Results dimensionless Analytical Finite element

Inner pipe force Nd kN 1202 1208

Inner pipe total deection d1 d2 mm 2996 3000

Outer pipe force at upstream bulkhead location Nc1 kN 2108 2112

Outer pipe force at downstream bulkhead location Nc2 kN 549 554

Note: (1) Based on inner pipe minimum uniform temperature of 85 1C

Parameter Symbol Unit Value

Temperature data

(c) Inner pipe non-uniform temperature outer pipe non-uniform temperature

Inner pipe inlet temperature Ti,p 1C 95

Inner pipe outlet temperature To,p 1C 85

Outer pipe inlet temperature Ti,c 1C 15

Outer pipe outlet temperature To,c 1C 10

Long pipe-in-pipe

Pipe-in-pipe length L m 11,000

Inner pipe heat loss coefcient bp 1/m 1.071 105

Outer pipe heat loss coefcient bc 1/m 6.301 105

Limit between short and long pipe-in-pipe(1) Lo m 6331oL

Upstream length over which spacers friction acts L1 m 4803

Results dimensionless Analytical Finite element

Anchor length at downstream end x2 mm 2910 2907

Bulkhead displacement at upstream end d1 mm 1456 1453

Bulkhead displacement at downstream end d2 mm 579 576

Inner pipe force N d; kN 445 442

Outer pipe force at upstream bulkhead location Nc1 kN 1364 1362

Outer pipe force at downstream bulkhead location Nc2 kN 801 798

Short pipe-in-pipe

Pipe-in-pipe length L km 6000oLo

Inner pipe heat loss coefcient bp 1/m 1.963 105

Outer pipe heat loss coefcient bc 1/m 1.155 105

Upstream length over which spacers friction acts L1 m 2303

Anchor length at upstream end x1 m 4177

Results dimensionless Analytical Finite element

Inner pipe force N d; kN 1159 1163

Outer pipe force at upstream bulkhead location Nc1 kN 2150 2154

Outer pipe force at downstream bulkhead location Nc2 kN 592 596

Note: (1) Based on inner and outer pipe minimum uniform temperature of 85 and 10 1C, respectively.

ARTICLE IN PRESS

A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 499

analytical formulae can describe thermal expansion characteristics when the outer

pipe temperature is constant. Analytical ndings indicated good agreement with

nite element results.

References

[1] Curson N. Designing high temperature high pressure pipelines (HPHT). Subsea pipeline technologies

for deepwater, Houston, Wyndham Warwick Hotel, Texas. December 1112, 1997. p. 119.

[2] Curson N. Design and installation of subsea pipelines for HP/HT uid transportation. HP/HT eld

development technology. Aberdeen, 1995. p. 119.

[3] Dixon M. Analysis methods for pipe-in-pipe systems. Offshore pipelines 96 conference, three-day

seminar arranged by IIR limited. London; 30th September, 1st and 2nd October 1996. p. 115.

[4] Tam CKW, Rivett SM, Young RC. Pipeline design for HP/HT eld developments. Progress in

HP/HT elds conference, the Airport Thistle Hotel, Aberdeen. 20 and 21 May 1998. p. 134.

[5] Sriskandarajah T, Ragupathy P, Anurudran G. Challenges in the design of HP/HT pipelines. 23rd

annual offshore pipeline technology conference (OPT 2000). The Holmenkollen Park Hotel Rica,

Oslo. 28 and 29 February 2000. p. 133.

[6] Inglis B, Morrison A. Analysing pipe-in-pipe solutions for HP/HT conditions. Offshore pipelines 96

conference, three-day seminar arranged by IIR limited. London; 30th September, 1st and 2nd

October 1996. p. 132.

[7] Judd SR. Pipe-in-pipe systems-the installation contractors experience. Offshore pipelines 96

conference, three-day seminar arranged by IIR limited. London; 30th September1st and 2nd

October 1996. p. 118.

[8] McKinnon C. Case-studies of HP/HT for pipeline detail design. Three-day seminar arranged by IIR

limited. London; 30th September1st and 2nd October 1996. p. 118.

[9] Welsh S. Suitable systems for high temperature owline insulation. Offshore pipelines 96 conference,

three-day seminar arranged by IIR limited. London, 2nd October 1996.

[10] Welch S, Summereld P. Second generation pipe-in-pipe technologies. OPT 99. p. 124.

[11] Tough GT, Denniel S, Al Sharif M, Hutchinson J. Nile-design and qualication of reeled pipe-in-pipe

for deepwater. Proceedings offshore technology conference. OTC 13257, Houston, Texas, USA. 30th

April3 May 2001. p. 19.

[12] Tough G, Al-Sharif M, Hutchinson J. Innovations key reeled pipe-in-pipe owline. Oil Gas J

2001:4652.

[13] Modi A, Hill N, Sheehan T. Cook eld development-the rst reeled pipe-in-pipe system in the UK

sector of the North Sea. Offshore pipeline technology conference. 26th and 27th February 2001.

p. 130.

[14] Mollison MI. Reeled installation of pipe-in-pipe insulated pipelines. 1991 Offshore mechanics and

artic engineering (OMAE), vol. V, Pipeline Technology. 1991. p. 13744.

[15] Endal G, Williams KA, Kvello O, Hammer G. The Gullfaks satellites project: reel installation of 6/

10 pipe-in-pipe owline. Offshore mechanics and arctic engineering (OMAE), 98-3903, Lisbon,

Portugal. July 69, 1998. p. 18.

[16] Bell M, Daly R. Reeled PIP SCR. Proceedings offshore technology conference, OTC 13184, Houston,

Texas, USA. 30 April3 May 2001. p. 110.

[17] Sahota BS, Ragupathy P, Wilkins R. Critical aspects of shell ETAP HP/HT pipe-in-pipe pipeline

design and construction. Proceedings of the ninth (1999) international offshore and polar engineering

conference, Brest, France. May 30June 4, 1999. p. 6473.

[18] Kaye D, LeMarchand D, Blondin P, Carr M. Lateral buckling design of the dunbar double wall

insulated pipeline. 18th Annual offshore pipeline technology conference, Copenhagen, 1995.

[19] Popineau D, Guyonnet P, Le Marchand D. Dunbar double wall insulated pipeline. Advances in

subsea pipeline engineering and technology, ASPECT 94, Aberdeen, 1994.

[20] Ling M, Dubibe JM, Alwyn goes with the ow. Offshore Engineer, April 1998. p. 13640.

ARTICLE IN PRESS

500 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500

[21] Suman JC, Karpathy SA. Design method addresses subsea pipeline thermal stresses. Oil Gas J

1993:859.

[22] Harrison GE, Kershenbaum NY, Choi HS. Expansion analysis of subsea pipe-in-pipe owline.

Proceedings of the seventh (1997) international offshore and polar engineering conference, Honolulu,

USA, May 2530, 1997. p. 2938.

[23] Guijt W. Design considerations of high-temperature pipelines. Proceedings of the ninth (1999)

international offshore and polar engineering conference, Brest, France, May 30June 4, 1999.

p. 6839.

[24] Rooduyn E. The design and installation of fully integrated owline bundle production systems. Fifth

International deepwater and marginal eld development conference, 1990.

[25] Fyrileiv O, Venas A. Finite element analysis of pipeline bundles on uneven seabed. Proceedings of the

eighth (1998) international offshore and polar engineering conference, Montreal, Canada, May

2429, 1998. p. 4652.

[26] Jinsi BK. Offshore risers must be designed to resist pipeline movement. Oil Gas J 1996:4251.

[27] Rich SK, Keevill CD, Tam CKW. Expansion absorption methods for HP/HT pipelines. Offshore

pipeline technology conference (OPT 99). The Okura Hotel, Amsterdam, 25 and 26 February 1999.

p. 116.

[28] Rich SK, Alleyne AG. System design for buried high temperature and pressure pipelines. Proceedings

of the offshore technology conference, OTC 8672, Houston, Texas, USA, 47 May 1998. p. 3417.

[29] Rich SK, Alleyne AG. Buried expansion loops control offshore line expansion, buckling. Offshore

Pipe Line Technology, April 1999. p. S2933.

[30] Peng LC. Stress analysis methods for underground pipe lines, Part 1basic calculations. Pipe Line

Industry, April 1972. p. 6670; Part 2soil-pipe interaction. Pipe Line Industry, May 1972. p. 659.

[31] Fekete LA. Structural design of pipe lines subject to temperature change. Part 1, Pipe Line Industry,

August 1974. p. 579; Part 2, Pipe Line Industry, September 1974. p. 505.

[32] DET NORSKE VERITAS, DNV Offshore Standard OS-F101, Submarine Pipeline Systems, 2000.

[33] Oliver KD, Rodger AA, Corbett GG. Assessment of pipeline integrity under impact from dropped

objects. Fourth international conference offshore structures-hazards, safety and engineering, 1995.

[34] Choi HS. Expansion analysis of offshore pipelines close to restraints. Proceedings of the fth (1995)

international offshore and polar engineering conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, June 1116,

1995. p. 818.

[35] Palmer A, Ling MTS. Movement of submarine pipelines close to platforms. Proceedings of the 13th

offshore Technology conference, OTC 4067, 1981. p. 1724. Also ASME J Energy Resources Technol

1982;104:31924.

[36] Burden RL, Faires JD, Reynolds AC. Numerical analysis, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Prindle, Weber &

Schmidt; 1981. p. 43961.

[37] Abramowitz M, Stegun IA. Handbook of mathematical functions, 9th ed. New York: Dover

Publications; 1972.

- Loads in RISA-3D WebinarTransféré parEliseo Samuel Puñez Robles
- Aquarius+uPVC+Product+CatalogueTransféré parnachiappan_ramesh
- Stainless - OD Pipe - DouglassTransféré parMichel Lupien
- Piping Solutions EngTransféré parAdnan Zika
- Tutorial - Soil Overburden and Seismic Wave Propagation in AutoPIPETransféré parJennifer Green
- IR-933R-1Transféré paralokbdas
- JosamTransféré pardavid0775
- CI-245_Micro-Lok® HP BrochureTransféré parJay Suguitan
- G820_04_2006Transféré parjoe smoe
- Sur_erect- Boq- Prefa- Pi- Pip- Rev ATransféré parshaikhsajid242
- 126717676 Tank Heat CalculationTransféré parElton Situmeang
- Heat Transfer. Cooling a Pipe Filled With WaterTransféré parpsn_kylm
- CT Conduccion EjemplosTransféré parleoxs
- Pds 15 Plem Rev021Transféré parchandru683
- alfie cvTransféré parLuis Angelo Bautista Lacson
- Reinforcement of Welded BranchesTransféré parFlabi Delta
- Rapp-It QRFTransféré parPradyumnaMalu
- 06a+bell_Delaware+method_stTransféré parAhmedHamadaBasiony
- KOPOS - Metalic Junction BoxesTransféré parcormolio
- Ahura Piping TrainingTransféré parDeepakRajurkar
- NDT-045[1]Transféré parMuhammad Salim Abdul Azis
- mech3220-2002-2Transféré parJeetun Ruveen
- ht lab manualTransféré pargvnagamani
- LEC_11Transféré parren
- 161605-161906-HMTTransféré parKislay Choudhary
- Book1Transféré parBlegoh Purwo
- Pipe DesignTransféré parShreevardhan Khoat
- 34_PanelBrownTransféré parjhon smith
- updated -18.7.18.xlsxTransféré parJai Prabu
- Drain Pipes Cetification 02Transféré parJohan A. Psaila

- Function structure in MathCadTransféré parHernán Covarrubias
- RCA&CAPA WorkshopTransféré parMukil Dev
- Pipeline Installation MethodologyTransféré parMukil Dev
- Pipelines+&+Subsea+Installations-Report,+20.06.14Transféré parVelpandian Mani
- Hydrostatic TestingTransféré parRicardo
- Mean current DensityTransféré parMukil Dev
- Appc Soil Properties 718Transféré parpinkuru
- WEBINAR 2016 Nonlinear DiagnosticTransféré parMukil Dev
- Societal RiskTransféré parMukil Dev
- DG-SetsTransféré parMukil Dev
- Sesam 2017 Release DocumentationTransféré parfaraj405
- Oil & gas project dBasic Versus DetaledTransféré parNoùrEl-Dín
- DragonwarTransféré parMukil Dev
- ResumeTransféré parMukil Dev
- Environmentally Assisted Fatigue and Fracture of Offshore Pipelines – Current Status and Future NeedsTransféré parMukil Dev
- Full Paper of Upheaval BucklingTransféré parMukil Dev
- Management Structure - GALFARTransféré parMukil Dev
- Effect of Pipeline-Soil Interaction on Subsea Pipeline Lateral Buckling AnalysisTransféré parMukil Dev
- LATERAL BUCKLING OF SUBSEA PIPELINES.pdfTransféré parMukil Dev
- Sesam Feature DescriptionTransféré parMukil Dev
- Sesam Pipeline SimBuckTransféré parMukil Dev
- Aspect ’94 Advances in Subsea Pipeline Engineering and TechnologyTransféré parMukil Dev
- AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE UPWARD AND LATERAL SOIL-PIPELINE INTERACTION IN SAND USING FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD*Transféré parMukil Dev
- Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology VolumeTransféré parMukil Dev
- Subsea Pipeline InspectionTransféré parMukil Dev
- Effects of internal/external pressure on the global buckling of pipelinesTransféré parMukil Dev
- Scam offer letterTransféré parMukil Dev
- Cfd Simulations in Safety CasesTransféré parMukil Dev
- AnodeTransféré parMarc Laurence

- Www Engineeringtoolbox ComTransféré parVinoth Kumar
- ESR With Raft (.std)Transféré partosifsayyed
- CRYOCARTransféré parsheikh
- Hydrodynamics of Ship PropellersTransféré pargerry
- Lecture 1Transféré parcaptainhass
- Effect of liquid viscosity on flow patterns of gas–liquid two-phase flowTransféré paryoupof83
- MST326 – TMA03Transféré parStuart
- Well Classification SystemTransféré parMuhammad Naufal Nazhib Khan
- Exam Solution 2009-10Transféré parConstAntinos
- 2003 [Jong-Yeon Hwang] Numerical Study of Taylor-Couette Flow With an Axial FlowTransféré parTont Ekawuth
- l3 Materials AbaqusTransféré parfurlings
- Mohr-Coulomb Model.pdfTransféré parRamesh
- ch22Transféré parIratechaos
- Thermal Conductivity - WikipediaTransféré parDomagoj Butumović
- LEC WEEK 6Transféré parIbnu Hamid
- The Different Technologies for Cooling Data CenterTransféré partuwinner
- EURME 303(Applied Termo Dynamics 1)Transféré parSri Kay
- Ch1 Introduction to Pneumatic System 2019Transféré parnarkuys syukran
- Design of Fiber-reinforced Composite Pressure Vessels UnderTransféré parhuangjl
- CFD Analysis of Symmetrical Tangential Inlet Cyclone SeparatorTransféré parMixed World
- Lengani paperTransféré parsamik4u
- AISC ASD Base plate thickness V2016-2.xlsTransféré paryusuf_jt
- MatLab-_Advanced_Simulation_of_Building_Systems_and_Control_with_SimulinkTransféré parAlberto Lopez Sanchez
- A Pun It 14 EquilibriumTransféré parBMichelle Samayoa
- CFX-Intro 14.0 WS08 Vortex-SheddingTransféré parRenan Ventura
- 13197_2010_Article_162Transféré parscream56
- FEE2015Transféré par蓉蓉
- Kinetic Theory by David Tong.pdfTransféré parmuhammad ali
- Retaining Wall DesignTransféré parhellios8502
- Drawing (1).pdfTransféré parJaskaran Singh