Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
CITATIONS READS
5 374
1 author:
A. Bokaian
23 PUBLICATIONS 640 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related
projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by A. Bokaian on 03 October 2015.
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive mathematical model for the thermal expansion of
pipe-in-pipe and bundle systems that are used in the offshore oil and gas industry. The inner
pipe and the outer pipes are assumed to have structural connections through bulkheads at
extremities and spacers or centralisers to prevent contact of the inner and the outer pipes. The
aim is to calculate the displacement and forces on the bulkheads and axial force in the inner
pipe.
In addition to protective pipe-in-pipes, short and long pipe-in-pipes are dened and the
limits between the two are clearly delineated. Analytical methods are extended to study the
effects of exponential temperature gradients along both the inner and the outer pipes, the pipe-
in-pipe length, tie-in spoolpieces, inner pipe weight, seabed and spacer friction and relative
axial stiffness of the inner and the outer pipes on the thermal expansion characteristics. The
iterative approach to solve thermal expansion characteristics proposed can be replaced by
analytical calculation in most practical situations. Simple analytical formulae are suggested
when the outer pipe temperature is constant. Analytical solutions indicate good agreement
with nite element numerical results.
r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Pipe-in-pipe; Bundle; Thermal expansion; Carrier pipe; Jacket pipe; Inner pipe; Outer pipe
0951-8339/$ - see front matter r 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.marstruc.2004.12.002
ARTICLE IN PRESS
476 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500
Nomenclature
1. Introduction
2. Theory
in which, N T;p is the thermal force in inner pipe, N n;p the force due to Poissons effect
in inner pipe, N E the end cap force on bulkhead, F s the tie-in spool frictional
resistance, N d; the force in inner pipe due to displacement of bulkheads, and N c the
tension force in outer pipe.
Throughout this paper, sufces p and c denote inner pipe and the outer pipe,
respectively.
The thermal force in the inner pipe is calculated as [30,31]:
where, E p is the inner pipe Youngs modulus of elasticity, Ap the inner pipe steel
cross-sectional area, a the coefcient of thermal expansion of steel pipeline, T d;p the
strain
tot
T,c
c
v,c z
net distance along pipe-in-pipe
f
x (anchor length) pote
ntial
inner pipe
FS (tie-in spool seabed friction force) Anchor region x (anchor length) (expansion)
seabed friction force on outer pipe
L/2
Fig. 1. Thermal expansion of symmetric pipe-in-pipe system. (a) Strain in outer pipe. (b) Forces on
bulkhead, inner and outer pipes.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
480 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500
inner pipe design temperature, and T a the ambient temperature which is assumed to
be equal to installation temperature.
The force in the inner pipe due to Poissons effect is evaluated from [30,31]:
N n;p sh;p Ap n, (2.3)
where, n is the Poissons ratio, and sh;p the hoop stress in inner pipe which is
calculated from [32]:
Dp tp
sh;p pd;p pans (2.4)
2tp
in which, Dp is the inner pipe nominal outer diameter, tp the inner pipe wall
thickness, pd;p the inner pipe internal design pressure, and pans the annulus design
pressure.
The end cap force on the bulkhead is evaluated from the following relationship:
N E pd;p inner area of inner pipe
pans annular area between inner and outer pipes
pamb outer area of bulkhead; 2:5
where, pamb is the outer pipe external hydrostatic pressure.
The end cap force N E is shared by both the inner and the outer pipes in proportion
to the axial stiffness as:
E p Ap
N E;p NE, (2.6)
E p Ap E c Ac
where, N E;p is the end cap force on inner pipe, E c the outer pipe Youngs modulus of
elasticity, and Ac the outer pipe steel cross-sectional area.
The end cap strain is:
NE
E . (2.7)
E p Ap E c Ac
The tie-in spoolpiece frictional resistance F s is obtained by multiplying its
submerged weight by the seabed longitudinal friction coefcient.
The tensile force in the inner pipe can be evaluated from:
N d 2E p Ap d=L (2.8)
where d is the bulkhead displacement (see Fig. 1b), and L the pipe-in-pipe length.
If the outer pipe suffers an increased temperature because of heat convection from
the inner pipe, the thermal strain in the outer pipe may similarly be written as:
T;c aT d;c T a , (2.9)
where T d;c is the outer pipe design temperature.
The hoop stress in the outer pipe is similarly calculated as:
D c tc
sh;c pans pamb , (2.10)
2tc
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 481
where Dc is the outer pipe nominal diameter, tc the outer pipe wall thickness, and
pamb the outer pipe external hydrostatic pressure.
The total strain acting along the outer pipe is dened as (tensile strain positive
otherwise compressive):
tot T;c n;c c , (2.11)
where, T;c is the thermal strain in outer pipe, n;c the outer pipe strain due to
Poissons effect nsh;c =E c ; and c the tensile strain in outer pipe as a result of
bulkhead displacement N c =E c Ac :
As shown in Fig. 1a, the strain in the outer pipe as a result of soil friction f [30,31]
and the net strain net are:
mW pip
f z,
E c Ac
(Ti,p Ta)
(Ti,p Ta)epz
(To,p Ta)
displaced
bulkhead spacer outer pipe bulkhead
L1 L2
x1 x2
(Td,p Ta)
inner pipe
Fig. 2. Inner pipe temperature variation and spacer friction force. (a) Variable temperature. (b) Constant
temperature.
Its effect can be incorporated in the above formulae by using the reduced seabed
friction coefcient dened as:
ms W p
m0 m 1 . (2.18)
m W pip
Eq. (2.17) may be rewritten as:
E c Ac L E c Ac
x2 L x SN T ms W p L=2 SN n N E F s 0
E p Ap mo W pip E p Ap
(2.19)
in which
SN T N T;p N T;c sum of thermal forces on bulkhead
1=m0 W pip E c Ac =E p Ap SN T SN n N E F s
LXLo 1
, (2.22)
4 E c Ac =2E p Ap 1 ms =m0 W p =W pip
strain
tot
net
anchor
upstream point downstream
bulkhead f bulkhead
L /2 L /2
tot
net
anchor
point
x1 L-x1
net
tot
anchor
point
x1 L-x1
Fig. 3. Thermal expansion of short pipe-in-pipes. (a) Uniform temperature. (b) Temperature gradient in
inner pipe. (c) Inner and outer pipe temperature variation.
Nc
E c Ac =E p Ap N T;p ms W p L=2 N n;p N E F s N T;c N n;c m0 W pip L=4
.
1 E c Ac =E p Ap
2:28
SN T ms W p L=2 SN n N E F s
x . (2.29)
m0 W pip
where, z is the distance measured from inner pipe inlet (upstream end), T i;p the inlet
temperature (at hot end of inner pipe), T z;p the temperature at distance z from inlet,
and bp the heat loss coefcient (decay constant) for inner pipe. bp is a function of the
pipeline and coating conductivity properties, internal uid properties and external
convection and may be written as:
1 T i;p T a
bp ln , (2.31)
L T o;p T a
where, To,p is the outlet temperature (at cold end of inner pipe).
The thermal force in the inner pipe varies from a maximum of N T;p1
E p Ap aT i;p T a at the inlet to a minimum of N T;p2 E p Ap aT o;p T a at the
outlet. The difference is balanced by the frictional forces generated by the spacers on
the inner pipe, as shown in Fig. 2a, according to which:
E p Ap aT i;p T o;p ms W p L2 L1 ,
L1 L2 L, 2:32
where, L1 ; L2 is the upstream and downstream length, respectively, over which two
opposing spacer friction forces act (see Fig. 2a).
ARTICLE IN PRESS
486 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500
E p Ap a
L1 L T i;p T o;p 2,
ms W p
E p Ap a
L2 L T i;p T o;p 2,
ms W p
L2 4L1 . 2:33
Throughout this paper, sufxes 1 and 2 refer to the upstream and the downstream
end of the pipe-in-pipe system, respectively.
The equilibrium of forces on the bulkheads results in:
N T;p1 ms W p L1 N n;p N E F s1 N d N c1 0,
m0 W pip x21
d1 . (2.37)
2E c Ac
The anchor point and the bulkhead displacement at the downstream end may
similarly be written as:
m0 W pip
net2 T;c n;c c2 x2 0,
E c Ac
Z x2
m0 W pip 2
d2 net2 dz x . (2.38)
0 2E c Ac 2
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 487
where SN T1 N T;p1 N T;c is the sum of thermal forces on the upstream
bulkhead.
For a uniform temperature pipe-in-pipe system but with different tie-in spool
weights, L1 L2 L=2 and the above relationships are simplied as:
F s1 F s2
x2 x1 ,
m0 W pip
E c Ac F s1 F s2 L E c Ac
x21 L x1
E p Ap m0 W pip m0 W pip E p Ap
SN T1 SN n N E F s1 ms W p L=2
1 F s1 F s2 2
0. 2:43
2 m0 W pip
The above solution is valid when x1 oL1 and x1 x2 pL:
Case 2 : x1 4L1 With reference to Fig. 2a, the net strain at the upstream end is:
m0 W pip
net1a T;c n;c c1 z; 0ozoL1 ,
E c Ac
m0 m1 W pip L1 m1 W pip
net1b T;c n;c c1 z; L1 ozox1 , (2.44)
E c Ac E c Ac
ARTICLE IN PRESS
488 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500
2:48
where A refers to the second term on right-hand side of Eq. (2.48).
Using Eq. (2.48), the inner pipe force becomes:
E p Ap W pip mm1 2 1 m A2
Nd x1 m1 L1 Ax1 m0 3m1 L21 0 . (2.49)
E c Ac L m0 2 2
By substituting N d; from the above and N c1 from Eq. (2.47) into the balance of
forces on the upstream bulkhead of Eq. (2.34), the following equation is obtained for
the calculation of x1 :
mm0 2 E c Ac
x1 m 1 L 1 A L x1
m E p Ap
E c Ac L
SN T1 SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1
E p Ap W pip
1
m0 m1 W pip L1 m0 3m1 L21 m0 A2 0. 2:50
2
The solution is valid when x1 4L1 and x1 x2 pL: Note that m0 m1 2m and
m1 m0 2ms W p =W pip :
(b) Short pipe-in-pipe
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 489
In cases where x1 x2 4L (see Fig. 3b), by equating the anchor point strain at the
downstream end from Eq. (2.38) to that at the upstream end from Eq. (2.44) and by
substituting x2 L x1 ; the following relationship is obtained:
N c1 N c2 W pip m0 m1 x1 m0 L1 L m1 L1 . (2.51)
By equating the above relationship with that of 2.36, the following expression is
obtained for x1 :
N T;p1 N T;p2 ms W p L1 L2 F s1 F s2 mo L2 m1 L1
x1 .
2mW pip 2m
(2.52)
The bulkheads displacements become:
Z x1 Z L1 Z x1
d1 net1 dz net1a dz net1b dz
0 0 L1
2
m0 m1 W pip L1 m m1 W pip L1 m W pip 2
T;c n;c c1 0 x1 1 x,
2E c Ac E c Ac 2E c Ac 1
Z Lx1 Z Lx1
m W pip
d2 T;c n;c c2 0
net2 dz z dz
0 0 E c Ac
2
m0 W pip L m0 W pip L
T;c n;c c2 L T;c n;c c2
2E c Ac E c Ac
m W pip 2
x1 0 x . 2:53
2E c Ac 1
Thus the inner pipe force may be written in terms of x1 and Nc2 as:
E p Ap
Nd d1 d2
L
E p Ap W pip m0 m1 L21 m0 L2 2
mx1 N T;c N n;c N c2 .
E c Ac L 2
2:54
Substitution of N d; in the balance of forces on the downstream bulkhead of Eq.
(2.34) and the subsequent use of Eq. (2.51) result in the following expressions for
N c1 and N c2 :
E c Ac
E p Ap N T;p2 ms W p L2 N n;p N E F s2 W pip 2mx1 m0 L2 m1 L1
N T;c N n;c
N c1
1 EEpc A
Ap
c
n h 2 2
i o
1 m0 L m1 m0 L1
W pip L 2 mx21 2mx1 m0 L2 m1 L1
,
1 EEpc A
Ap
c
ARTICLE IN PRESS
490 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500
E c Ac
E p Ap N T;p2 ms W p L2 N n;p N E F s2 N T;c N n;c
W pip =Lm0 L2 m1 m0 L21 =2 mx21
N c2 . (2.55)
1 EEpc A
Ap
c
where T i;c is the inlet temperature (at hot end of outer pipe), T z;c the temperature
at distance z from inlet, and bc the heat loss coefcient for outer pipe similarly
strain
tot1
strain
T,c1 tot2
c-1 T,c1
v,c c2
v,c
net1 net2
f
f
pote
ntial
l
ntia
pote
(a) Strain in outer pipe
1 x1 x2 2
anchor region
L
(c) Thermal expansion
Fig. 4. Pipe-in-pipe expansion under temperature variation. (a) Strain in outer pipe. (b) Outer pipe
temperature prole. (c) Thermal expansion.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 491
dened as:
1 T i;c T a
bc ln . (2.58)
L T o;c T a
(a) Long pipe-in-pipe
Case 1 : x1 oL1
With reference to Fig. 4(a), the upstream anchor point and bulkhead displacement
are obtained from:
net1 tot1 f T;c n;c c1 f 1 aT i;c T a ebc x1
m W pip
n;c c1 0 x1 0,
E c Ac
Z x1
1 1 m W pip 2
d1 net1 dz aT i;c T a x1 e bc x1
0 x , (2.59)
0 bc bc 2E c Ac 1
where tot1 is the total strain at upstream end, dened similar to Eq. (2.11).
The rst equation may be rewritten as:
N c1 m0 W pip x1 aT i;c T a ebc x1 E c Ac N n;c . (2.60)
With the above relationship, Eq. (2.34) for the equilibrium of forces on the
upstream bulkhead is reduced to:
d1 d2
aT i;c T a ebc x1 E c Ac N T;p1 m0 W pip x1 E p Ap
L
SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1 0. 2:61
where z is the distance from inner pipe outlet and T z;c the temperature at distance z
from outlet.
The anchor point and the bulkhead displacement at the downstream end may
similarly be calculated from:
m0 W pip
net2 tot2 f aT o;c T a ebc x2 n;c c2 x2 0,
E c Ac
Z x2
1 1 m W pip 2
d2 net2 dz aT o;c T a x2 e bc x2
0 x ,
0 bc bc 2E c Ac 2
(2.63)
where tot2 is the total strain at downstream end.
From Eq. (2.63), the outer pipe force at the downstream end becomes:
N c2 m0 W pip x2 aT o;c T a ebc x2 E c Ac N n;c . (2.64)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
492 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500
Z x1 Z L1 Z x1
d1 net1 dz net1a dz net1b dz
0 0 L1
1 1 W pip
aT i;c T a x1 ebc x1 m m1 L21 m1 x21 . 2:71
bc bc 2E c Ac 0
Eq. (2.70) may be rewritten as:
N c1 m1 W pip x1 aT i;c T a ebc x1 E c Ac N n;c m0 m1 W pip L1 . (2.72)
With the above, Eq. (2.34) is reduced to:
d1 d2
aT i;c T a ebc x1 E c Ac N T;p1 m1 W pip x1 E p Ap
L
SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1 m0 m1 W pip L1 0. 2:73
Eqs. (2.63) and (2.65) remain valid for the downstream bulkhead displacement
and balance of forces.
Substitution of d1 from Eq. (2.71) and d2 from Eq. (2.63) into Eq. (2.73) results in
the following expression in terms of x1 and x2 :
bc x1 E c Ac m1 W pip 1 x1 bc x1
aT i;c T a e x1 aT i;c T a e
E p Ap E p Ap bc L L
1 x2 bc x2 W pip
aT o;c T a e m x2 m0 x22 m0 m1 L21
bc L L 2E c Ac L 1 1
aT i;c T o;c
bc L
N T;p1 SN n N E F s1 ms W p L1 m0 m1 W pip L1
0. 2:74
E p Ap
Eqs. (2.66b) and (2.74) can similarly be solved in terms of x1 and x2 : The solution
is valid when x1 4L1 and x1 x2 pL:
(b) Short pipe-in-pipe
ARTICLE IN PRESS
494 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500
With reference to Fig 3c, by equating the anchor point strain at the upstream end
from Eq. (2.70) to that at the downstream end from Eq. (2.63), and by substituting
x2 L x1 ; the following relationship is obtained:
N c1 m0 m1 W pip L1 m1 W pip
aT i;c T a ebc x1 n;c x1
E c Ac E c Ac E c Ac
N c2 m0 W pip
aT o;c T a ebc Lx1 n;c L x1 . 2:75
E c Ac E c Ac
which is identical to Eq. (2.51) for uniform temperature. Equating the above
relationship with Eq. (2.36) results in the following equation for x1 :
Z x2 Z Lx1
m0 W pip
d2 net2 dz aT o;c T a ebc z n;c c2 z dz
0 0 E c Ac
T i;c T a bc Lx1
aebc L e 1 n;c c2 L x1
bc
m W pip
0 L x1 2 . 2:78
2E c Ac
E p Ap
Nd d1 d2
L
aT i;c T o;c E p Ap W pip m0 m1 L21 m0 L2
E p Ap mx21
Lbc E c Ac L 2
N n;c N c2 . 2:79
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 495
Substitution of N d in Eq. (2.34) and the subsequent use of Eq. (2.76) result in the
following relationships for N c1 and N c2 :
It should be noted that the rst quotient in the numerator represents the average
temperature in the outer pipe.
3. Application
The above mathematical model was applied to two pipe-in-pipe systems whose
characteristics are summarised in Table 1. A long pipe-in-pipe of length 11,000 m
and short one of 6000 m are considered. All thermal expansion cases discussed in this
paper are considered. The ndings are tabulated in Tables 2 and 3 along with
corresponding nite element analysis results.
4. Conclusions
Based on simple columb friction between the inner pipe and the spacers, analytical
formulas were developed for thermal expansion of non-compliant pipe-in-pipe
systems. It was concluded that the anchor length ratio increases with both a decrease
in pipe-in-pipe length and an increase in the square root of the resultant force that
tends to displace the bulkhead whereas for a long protective pipe-in-pipe with thin
outer pipe wall thickness, the anchor length is directly proportional to this force.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
496 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500
Table 1
Pipe-in-pipe data
Table 2
Hoop stress
For short pipe-in-pipe systems, the effect of outer pipe temperature variation on
the inner pipe axial force and outer pipe tension can be replaced by its average over
the pipe-in-pipe length. The inner pipe axial force increases with increase in the
resultant force on the bulkhead.
For the case of exponentially varying outer pipe temperature, iterative methods
should be employed to calculate the thermal expansion characteristics. The iteration
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 497
Table 3
Pipe-in-pipe thermal expansion characteristics
Temperature data
(a) Uniform temperature
Inner pipe design temperature Td,p 1C 95
Outer pipe design temperature Td,c 1C 15
Long pipe-in-pipe
Pipe-in-pipe length L m 11,000
Anchor length x m 4110
Limit between short and long pipe-in-pipe Lo m 8491oL
Short pipe-in-pipe
Pipe-in-pipe length L km 6000oLo
Temperature data
(b) Inner pipe non-uniform temperature outer pipe uniform temperature
Inner pipe inlet temperature Ti,p 1C 95
Inner pipe outlet temperature To,p 1C 85
Outer pipe design temperature Td,c 1C 15
Long pipe-in-pipe
Pipe-in-pipe length L km 11,000
Heat loss coefcient bp 1/m 1.071 105
Limit between short and long pipe-in-pipe(1) Lo m 7760oL
Upstream length over which spacers friction acts L1 M 4803
Reduced friction coefcient mo dimensionless 0.4
Results dimensionless Analytical Finite element
Table 3 (continued)
Short pipe-in-pipe
Pipe-in-pipe length L km 6000oLo
Heat loss coefcient bp 1/m 1.963 105
Upstream length over which spacers friction acts L1 m 2303
Results dimensionless Analytical Finite element
Temperature data
(c) Inner pipe non-uniform temperature outer pipe non-uniform temperature
Inner pipe inlet temperature Ti,p 1C 95
Inner pipe outlet temperature To,p 1C 85
Outer pipe inlet temperature Ti,c 1C 15
Outer pipe outlet temperature To,c 1C 10
Long pipe-in-pipe
Pipe-in-pipe length L m 11,000
Inner pipe heat loss coefcient bp 1/m 1.071 105
Outer pipe heat loss coefcient bc 1/m 6.301 105
Limit between short and long pipe-in-pipe(1) Lo m 6331oL
Upstream length over which spacers friction acts L1 m 4803
Results dimensionless Analytical Finite element
Note: (1) Based on inner and outer pipe minimum uniform temperature of 85 and 10 1C, respectively.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500 499
References
[1] Curson N. Designing high temperature high pressure pipelines (HPHT). Subsea pipeline technologies
for deepwater, Houston, Wyndham Warwick Hotel, Texas. December 1112, 1997. p. 119.
[2] Curson N. Design and installation of subsea pipelines for HP/HT uid transportation. HP/HT eld
development technology. Aberdeen, 1995. p. 119.
[3] Dixon M. Analysis methods for pipe-in-pipe systems. Offshore pipelines 96 conference, three-day
seminar arranged by IIR limited. London; 30th September, 1st and 2nd October 1996. p. 115.
[4] Tam CKW, Rivett SM, Young RC. Pipeline design for HP/HT eld developments. Progress in
HP/HT elds conference, the Airport Thistle Hotel, Aberdeen. 20 and 21 May 1998. p. 134.
[5] Sriskandarajah T, Ragupathy P, Anurudran G. Challenges in the design of HP/HT pipelines. 23rd
annual offshore pipeline technology conference (OPT 2000). The Holmenkollen Park Hotel Rica,
Oslo. 28 and 29 February 2000. p. 133.
[6] Inglis B, Morrison A. Analysing pipe-in-pipe solutions for HP/HT conditions. Offshore pipelines 96
conference, three-day seminar arranged by IIR limited. London; 30th September, 1st and 2nd
October 1996. p. 132.
[7] Judd SR. Pipe-in-pipe systems-the installation contractors experience. Offshore pipelines 96
conference, three-day seminar arranged by IIR limited. London; 30th September1st and 2nd
October 1996. p. 118.
[8] McKinnon C. Case-studies of HP/HT for pipeline detail design. Three-day seminar arranged by IIR
limited. London; 30th September1st and 2nd October 1996. p. 118.
[9] Welsh S. Suitable systems for high temperature owline insulation. Offshore pipelines 96 conference,
three-day seminar arranged by IIR limited. London, 2nd October 1996.
[10] Welch S, Summereld P. Second generation pipe-in-pipe technologies. OPT 99. p. 124.
[11] Tough GT, Denniel S, Al Sharif M, Hutchinson J. Nile-design and qualication of reeled pipe-in-pipe
for deepwater. Proceedings offshore technology conference. OTC 13257, Houston, Texas, USA. 30th
April3 May 2001. p. 19.
[12] Tough G, Al-Sharif M, Hutchinson J. Innovations key reeled pipe-in-pipe owline. Oil Gas J
2001:4652.
[13] Modi A, Hill N, Sheehan T. Cook eld development-the rst reeled pipe-in-pipe system in the UK
sector of the North Sea. Offshore pipeline technology conference. 26th and 27th February 2001.
p. 130.
[14] Mollison MI. Reeled installation of pipe-in-pipe insulated pipelines. 1991 Offshore mechanics and
artic engineering (OMAE), vol. V, Pipeline Technology. 1991. p. 13744.
[15] Endal G, Williams KA, Kvello O, Hammer G. The Gullfaks satellites project: reel installation of 6/
10 pipe-in-pipe owline. Offshore mechanics and arctic engineering (OMAE), 98-3903, Lisbon,
Portugal. July 69, 1998. p. 18.
[16] Bell M, Daly R. Reeled PIP SCR. Proceedings offshore technology conference, OTC 13184, Houston,
Texas, USA. 30 April3 May 2001. p. 110.
[17] Sahota BS, Ragupathy P, Wilkins R. Critical aspects of shell ETAP HP/HT pipe-in-pipe pipeline
design and construction. Proceedings of the ninth (1999) international offshore and polar engineering
conference, Brest, France. May 30June 4, 1999. p. 6473.
[18] Kaye D, LeMarchand D, Blondin P, Carr M. Lateral buckling design of the dunbar double wall
insulated pipeline. 18th Annual offshore pipeline technology conference, Copenhagen, 1995.
[19] Popineau D, Guyonnet P, Le Marchand D. Dunbar double wall insulated pipeline. Advances in
subsea pipeline engineering and technology, ASPECT 94, Aberdeen, 1994.
[20] Ling M, Dubibe JM, Alwyn goes with the ow. Offshore Engineer, April 1998. p. 13640.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
500 A. Bokaian / Marine Structures 17 (2004) 475500
[21] Suman JC, Karpathy SA. Design method addresses subsea pipeline thermal stresses. Oil Gas J
1993:859.
[22] Harrison GE, Kershenbaum NY, Choi HS. Expansion analysis of subsea pipe-in-pipe owline.
Proceedings of the seventh (1997) international offshore and polar engineering conference, Honolulu,
USA, May 2530, 1997. p. 2938.
[23] Guijt W. Design considerations of high-temperature pipelines. Proceedings of the ninth (1999)
international offshore and polar engineering conference, Brest, France, May 30June 4, 1999.
p. 6839.
[24] Rooduyn E. The design and installation of fully integrated owline bundle production systems. Fifth
International deepwater and marginal eld development conference, 1990.
[25] Fyrileiv O, Venas A. Finite element analysis of pipeline bundles on uneven seabed. Proceedings of the
eighth (1998) international offshore and polar engineering conference, Montreal, Canada, May
2429, 1998. p. 4652.
[26] Jinsi BK. Offshore risers must be designed to resist pipeline movement. Oil Gas J 1996:4251.
[27] Rich SK, Keevill CD, Tam CKW. Expansion absorption methods for HP/HT pipelines. Offshore
pipeline technology conference (OPT 99). The Okura Hotel, Amsterdam, 25 and 26 February 1999.
p. 116.
[28] Rich SK, Alleyne AG. System design for buried high temperature and pressure pipelines. Proceedings
of the offshore technology conference, OTC 8672, Houston, Texas, USA, 47 May 1998. p. 3417.
[29] Rich SK, Alleyne AG. Buried expansion loops control offshore line expansion, buckling. Offshore
Pipe Line Technology, April 1999. p. S2933.
[30] Peng LC. Stress analysis methods for underground pipe lines, Part 1basic calculations. Pipe Line
Industry, April 1972. p. 6670; Part 2soil-pipe interaction. Pipe Line Industry, May 1972. p. 659.
[31] Fekete LA. Structural design of pipe lines subject to temperature change. Part 1, Pipe Line Industry,
August 1974. p. 579; Part 2, Pipe Line Industry, September 1974. p. 505.
[32] DET NORSKE VERITAS, DNV Offshore Standard OS-F101, Submarine Pipeline Systems, 2000.
[33] Oliver KD, Rodger AA, Corbett GG. Assessment of pipeline integrity under impact from dropped
objects. Fourth international conference offshore structures-hazards, safety and engineering, 1995.
[34] Choi HS. Expansion analysis of offshore pipelines close to restraints. Proceedings of the fth (1995)
international offshore and polar engineering conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, June 1116,
1995. p. 818.
[35] Palmer A, Ling MTS. Movement of submarine pipelines close to platforms. Proceedings of the 13th
offshore Technology conference, OTC 4067, 1981. p. 1724. Also ASME J Energy Resources Technol
1982;104:31924.
[36] Burden RL, Faires JD, Reynolds AC. Numerical analysis, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Prindle, Weber &
Schmidt; 1981. p. 43961.
[37] Abramowitz M, Stegun IA. Handbook of mathematical functions, 9th ed. New York: Dover
Publications; 1972.