Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
May 2017
Group : L2
References ............................................................................................................................................ 12
Appendix .............................................................................................................................................. 13
Page | 1
1.0 Introduction
The unit consists of mainly a plate heat exchanger with hot and cold water circulation
systems with all the necessary instrumentation for heat exchanger studies. A data
acquisition system is provided to allow on-line data for recording temperature, mass flow
rate and calculation for mass and energy balances, heat transfer coefficients, heat exchanger
efficiencies and log mean temperature difference calculations.
The objectives of this experiment are to determine the efficiencies and overall heat
transfer coefficient for the plate heat exchanger in a counter-current operation mode and
co-current operation mode.
Plate heat exchangers are now common and very small brazed versions are used in the
hot-water sections of millions of combination boilers. The general equation is:
Q = UATm
Where
Q = heat transfer per unit time, W
U = the overall heat transfer coefficient,
W/m2 C
A = heat transfer area, m2
Tm = the mean temperature difference, the
temperature driving force, C
Page | 2
From the result it is observed that, if we omit the first reading at cold water flowrate at
8 LPM as outlier due to its value differ significantly from other values, when the flow rate
of cold water is increased, the heat transfer coefficient in the heat exchanger also increases.
For the co-current flow of the heat exchanger operation however our data follows the above
equation for counter-current flow of the heat exchanger operation. When the heat transfer
coefficient (U) increases, the total heat transfer (q) will also increase. This will result in a
higher efficiency (E) as E = q/qmax.
Page | 3
2.0 Methodology and Experimental Procedures
METHODOLOGY
Page | 4
Note: Flow chart Icon
Data recording
Decision Step
Step
Page | 5
3.0 Results and Discussion
Graph 1: Graph of plate heat exchanger efficiency against the cold water flowrate.
Figure 1 shows the relation between the operation mode of a plate heat exchanger and
its efficiency. The hot water in the tank is maintained at 55oC. In Graph 1, the result is
obtained by maintaining the flow rate of hot water at 12 LPM and the flow rate of cold
water is manipulated from 8 to 22 LPM. From Figure 1, it is observed that when the
flowrate of cold water is increased, the efficiency of the heat exchanger decreasing. This in
fact is the opposite of the theoretical predictions but if we omit the reading at 8 LPM as
outlier, we will get the results as what we can predict theoretically. If we increase the
flowrate of the cold water, the efficiency of the heat exchanger will increase too. There
might be some errors in recording and taking the value which will be discussed later.
In addition, Graph 1 also shows us that counter-current mode operation of the heat
exchanger will give a higher efficiency than that of co-current mode which is true from
theoretical predictions. This is due to the fact that both fluids moving in the opposite
directions, it will significantly improve the heat transfer between both fluids.
Page | 6
Graph 2: Graph of heat transfer coefficient vs cold water flowrate
Graph 2 shows the relation between the operation mode of a plate heat exchanger and
the heat transfer coefficient. The hot water in the tank is maintained at 55oC. In Graph 2, the
result is obtained by maintaining the flow rate of hot water at 12 LPM and the flow rate of cold
water is manipulated from 8 to l6 LPM.
From both figures, it is observed that, if we omit the first reading at cold water flowrate
at 8 LPM as outlier due to its value differ significantly from other values, when the flow rate
of cold water is increased, the heat transfer coefficient in the heat exchanger also increases. In
addition, Graph 2 also shows that counter current mode operation of the heat exchanger will
give a higher heat transfer coefficient than that of co-current mode.
From the result of our experiment the effect is more visible regarding to heat transfer
coefficient to the efficiency of the heat exchanger. The result that we obtained, however, does
not correlates with the equation
q = U x A x LMTD
Page | 7
for the co-current flow of the heat exchanger operation however our data follows the above
equation for counter-current flow of the heat exchanger operation. When the heat transfer
coefficient (U) increases, the total heat transfer (q) will also increase. This will result in a higher
efficiency (E) as E = q/qmax.
We could see that from both graphs and readings, there are some value that must be
omitted and considered as outliers due to its value differ significantly from other values. The
inaccurate result might be due to some errors that occur during the experiment such as heat lost
to the surrounding or parallax error what occur while taking temperature reading.
During the experiment, there might be heat lost to the surrounding. This is cause by the
defect in the insulation system of the plate heat exchanger. To overcome this, always perform
maintenance on the plate heat exchanger to ensure the efficiency of the insulation system.
Parallax error may occur while taking the temperature reading and adjusting the water
flow rate. To overcome this error, always ensures the eye level is perpendicular to the scale or
taking every readings to calculate the average temperature.
Possible Errors:
1. Before the reading of the temperature is taken, we need to wait one minute. Zero error
might occur on the stopwatch.
2. Parallax error may occur when the reading of the flow rate of water.
3. Random error might occur when there is a heat loss from the water and the temperature
recorded will not be accurate.
4. Systematic error can be caused by the inaccuracy of the data obtained.
Page | 8
Methods for Result Improvement:
1. To overcome parallax error, the eye level must be perpendicular to the reading.
2. Zero error can be prevented by setting the stopwatch to 0 before any reading was
taken.
3. Random error can be overcome by carry out the experiment in a place with room
temperature.
4. Systematic error can be reduced by calculating the average of each data.
Page | 9
4.0 Conclusion
There are three types of manipulating factor for this experiment, which are flow rate
and the mode of heat exchanger which includes the co-current and counter-current flow.
Firstly, when setting the hot water as a constant a flow rate and the cold water flow rate
have been varied 8 to 16 LPM. Theoretically as heat transfer coefficient increases, the
efficiency increases, however, from the result it is observed that, if we omit the first reading
at cold water flowrate at 8 LPM as outlier due to its value differ significantly from other
values, when the flow rate of cold water is increased, the heat transfer coefficient in the
heat exchanger also increases. For the co-current flow of the heat exchanger operation
however our data follows the above equation for counter-current flow of the heat exchanger
operation. When the heat transfer coefficient (U) increases, the total heat transfer (q) will
also increase. This resulted in a higher efficiency (E) as E = q/qmax.
Firstly, the results obtained delineate that as the flow rate increases, the heat transfer
coefficient and efficiency increases. It has proven that the elementary equation from basic
thermodynamics that states that the rate of heat transfer equals to the overall heat transfer
coefficient multiplied by area of the tubes followed by multiplying the log mean
temperature difference, Q=UATlm. In another word, the rate of heat transfer is directly
proportional to the overall heat transfer coefficient.
After conducting the experiment set with the plate heat exchanger in both co-current
and counter-current mode, it can be concluded that the counter-current mode operation of
the heat exchanger will give a higher efficiency and overall heat transfer coefficient than
that of co-current mode which is true from theoretical predictions. This is due to the fact
that both fluids moving in the opposite directions, it will significantly improve the heat
transfer between both fluids. As a result, it can be observed that from the results there are
some value that must be omitted and considered as outliers due to its value differ
significantly from other values. The inaccurate result might be due to some errors that occur
during the experiment such as heat lost to the surrounding or parallax error what occur
while taking temperature reading.
Page | 10
In conclusion, much have been learned about the factors affecting the heat transfer
coefficient and efficiency. This is very useful and important for chemical engineers like us
because we are most probably going to encounter a heat exchanger in the industry.
Page | 11
References
Afgan, N. H. (1974). Heat Exchanger: Design and Theory Sourcebook. New York: McGraw-
Hill.
Bergman, T. L., Lavine, F. P., & Dewit, D. P. (2011). Fundamentals of Heat and Mass
Transfer, 7th Edition. Hoboken: Incropera.
Cengal, Y. A., & Ghafar, A. J. (2011). Conductive Heat Transfer. Heat and Mass Transfer:
Fundamental and Application. 4th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hause, H. (1983). Heat Transfer in Counte- flow, Parallel Flow and Cross Flow. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
Mueller, A. C. (1973). Heat Exchanger: Fundamental of Heat Transfer. New York: McGraw-
Hill.
Page | 12
Appendix
Page | 13
CALCULATIONS
1. Calculate the Tavg to find the temperature for properties.
, + ,
, =
2
, + ,
, =
2
2. Using table A-9 from Appendix (Cengel& Ghajar, 2015), interpolations can be done to
find the properties needed, such as density (kg/m3) and specific heat capacity (J/Kg.K)
both for cold and hot water.
1 1 3
3. To calculate mass flowrate, = 60 1000 (Note: to convert the
flowrate in LPM to m3/s)
6. To calculate U from Q = UA
1 2
=
ln 1
2
For co-current,
1 = , ,
2 = , ,
For countercurrent,
1 = , ,
2 = , ,
7. Since A = 0.96 m2,
Page | 14
8. To calculate the efficiency, the relation between efficiency and qmax can be used.
=
By comparing the value of Ch and Cc, we can find Cmin, which is the smaller value between
those two. Then substitute to the formula. = (, , )
9. Calculate the efficiency.
Page | 15
COUNTER-CURRENT OPERATED PLATE HEAT EXCHANGER DATA
Page | 16