Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 23

12/16/2010

Overview of
P. vannamei Culture and
Broodstock Domestication in
Asia

David Kawahigashi

Origin of P. vannamei

1
12/16/2010

2010 P. vannamei Culture

Current trends in Asian shrimp culture


Rapidly increasing production throughout 2000s
Continued replacement of monodon by vannamei
Lower cost of production; increased market price
Emergence of more new diseases & increased emphasis
on prevention and biosecurity measures
Increased intensity (partial harvesting)
Growth of inland (low salinity) shrimp farming
Increasing market protectionism, trade tariffs & antibiotic
residue problems
Consolidation/Integration/Incorporation
/ g / p of operations
p
including contract farming
Increased local domestication/selection efforts
Adoption of GAP/BMPs/Certification/Traceability/
Eco-labeling with certified SPF/SPR shrimp
Search for new and domestic markets

2
12/16/2010

World Shrimp Aquaculture by Species:1990-


Species:1990-2009

Million MT

3.6 Intro. of
3.2 vannamei
Percentages indicate the share of L. vannamei

28
2.8 into Asia
1980-2002 data: FISHSTAT (2006).
2.4 2003-2008 data: GSOL estimates.

2.0
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
1990 1991 19921993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 20002001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20072008 2009

L. vannamei P. monodon Other Marine Shrimp M. rosenbergii


5
Sources: FAO (2006), GSOL (2008), ABCC (2008)

Production (mt) Production of all shrimp and P. vannamei in Asia est. 2009
1,300,000
1,200,000
All shrimp
1,100,000
1 000 000
1,000,000 P vannamei
P.
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
-
China Thailand Vietnam Indonesia India Malaysia Philippines Bangladesh Taiwan

3
12/16/2010

Asia


Production
2.7 m MT
82% of World Tota
of 3.4 m MT of
marine shrimp

China
Thailand
Vietnam
Indonesia
India

76% P. vannamei

Latin America
Ecuador
Mexico
Brazil
Venezuela
Central America

Production:
576,000 MT
17% of world total
of 3.4 m MT of marine shrimp

100% P. vannamei

4
12/16/2010

Costs of vannamei Production


Country Prodn. Cost Sales Price
(US$/kg) (US$/kg)
China (15 g) 2.60 3.30
Philippines (15 g) 2.90 3.89
Taiwan (15 g) 2.50 3.50
Thailand (33 g) 3.90 7.35
Thailand (20 g) 3.45 4.79
Indonesia (20 g) 3 50
3.50 4 35
4.35
Brazil (15 g) 2.50 3.12
Ecuador (15 g) 1.75 2.70
Feed costs 55%, Energy 25%, Seed 3-5%, Labour 10%. But
increasing 10-15% this year due to incg. costs

History of P. vannamei
Domestication

1970s: USA (Florida), Panama, Tahiti


1980s: Hawaii (1982), Ecuador (1988)
1990s: South and Central America, Taiwan
2000s: Asia, Europe, Africa, Pacific Islands,
Middle East

5
12/16/2010

Flow of P. vannamei stocks to Asia


Original wild
Stocks from
Latin America

IFREMER L. American
OI,
French Brood
Hawaii Polynesia programs

Broodstock US shrimp Breeding Local Pacific SPT shrimp


S
Supply
l CCos G
Grow-
Grow -outt programs I l d Sh
Island Shrimp
i f
from ponds
d
(Hawaii, USA) Companies in Asia Farms and tanks

Asian
Maturation
Systems

Origin of OI stocks of P. vannamei


Pop Origin Introduced OI
I Sinaloa, Mexico To Kona, HI 1989
II Ecuador 1992
III Hybrid of I and II Pre-batch
IV Oaxaca, Mexico Batch # 1996
V Chiapas, Mexico Batch # 1997
VI Esmeraldas, Ecuador Batch # 1997
VII Panama hybrids Batch # 1999
Before 1997: Balanced selection (50% growth + 50%
TSVr)

After 1997: Industrial Line: 30% Growth + 70% TSV


Research Line: 100%Growth

6
12/16/2010

Suppliers of SPF/SPR Broodstock


(USA)

Hawaii:
The Oceanic Institute (OI)
Shrimp Improvement Systems (Hawaii & Florida)
High Health Aquaculture Inc.
Kona Bay Marine Resources (now IAI Co.)
Molokai Sea Farms

Saipan:
Saipan Aquaculture

Majority of Broodstock Produced in-country


from Local Breeding Programs
(2009 estimated)
Total USA Asia %Local
Country Broodstock Broodstock Broodstock Broodstock
Thailand 150,000 7,000 143,000 95%
Vietnam 70,000 20,000 50,000 80%
Malaysia 25,000 5,000 20,000 80%
Indonesia 100,000 50,000 50,000 50%
China 400,000 100,000 300,000 75%
India 10,000 5,000 5000 50%
Philippines 10,000 5,000 5,000 50%
Total 765,000 192,000 573,000

7
12/16/2010

Thailand: Imported Broodstock Replaced By


Broodstock from Local Breeding Programs

Year Imported SPF Estimated % of Total


2005 70,867 100% of 450,000 mt
2006 55,205 70% of 520,000 mt
2007 41,715 52% of 530,000 mt
2008 14,221 20% of 500,000 mt
2009 5,000 (est) >5%
5% of 600,000 mt

Sources:
www.fisheries.go.th/newsupdate/N_white_shrimp.doc
http://www.fisheries.go.th/shrimp/download/vannamei.pdf

CP Thailand Breeding Program

Largest shrimp breeding program in


the world
2000+ families per year
200,000+ broodstock per year
Does not sell broodstock
Supplies CP Thailand, Malaysia,
Vietnam, China, and India

8
12/16/2010

CP Thailand PL Market Share


(2009 estimate)

Thailand: 50-60%
Malaysia: 60-80%
Vietnam: 20-30%
China: 20-30%
Indonesia: 0%

*90% of CP farms/customers use CP grow-out feeds


*PL quality is the driver to CPs integrated business

BroodstockDemandWillIncrease
(China,Thailand,Vietnam,Indonesia,India,Philippines,Malaysia)

Broodstock Requirement SPF Broodstock


Numbers
Certified
C tifi d S
Suppliers
li 480 000 (2009)
480,000
(USA and Thailand)
Certified Suppliers 280,000
(excluding CP*)
2009 Broodstock 700,000+
Requirement
From Local Pond Broodstock 500,000+
(non-SPF)

Broodstock requirement in 5 1,500,000+


years

9
12/16/2010

Burapa Mass Selection Program


Phang Nha, Thailand

Growth Improvement Due to


5 Years of Genetic Improvement
Days shrimp/kg (2007) shrimp/kg (2010)
60 100+ 75 - 85
80 85 - 90 65 - 70
90 75 - 80 55 - 65
110 60 - 70 45 - 55
120 50 - 60 40 - 45
130 45 - 50 35 - 40
160 40 - 45 32 - 33
180 25 - 30

10
12/16/2010

Pros and Cons of SPF/SPR and locally-


locally-
selected stocks
SPF/SPR Locally selected
Disease-
Disease-free (only for pathogens May carry disease so need to
tested for and at time of testing) screen (especially for IHHNV,
May be genetically resistant to WSSV & TSV etc)
specific pathogens (SPR for TSV) May not be resistant, but may
Not resistant to any other develop resistance to multiple
pathogens pathogens
Selected for fast growth Can select for fast growth
Most suitable for biosecure systems Better for non
non--biosecure systems
Useful as stock for domestication Shrimp selected suitable for local
programmes environment/culture conditions
Usually batches are sibs and inbred Require broad founder population
Must be out-
out-bred to maintain to prevent inbreeding
genetic diversity Appear cheap, but currently not
Appear expensive as valuable as SPF/R

Selection options
Mass selection Family/combined selection
Based only on individual Based on pedigree of parents
performance (full and half sibs)
Requires large pool of parent Can be started with fewer parent
stocks stocks
t k
Uses natural mating Uses artificial insemination
Used for standard characters Can be applied to any desired
(growth/disease resistance) character
Efficient for characteristics with More efficient for characters with
high heritability rates low heritability
Low cost and most common More expensive (rare)
Must evaluate all shrimp in same Can evaluate in different
environment environments
High risk of inbreeding Can control inbreeding
depression More efficient with faster gains
Not efficient for binary Efficient for binary (multiple trait)
characteristics or those with low characteristics
heritabilities
Full and/or half-sib families
Lines maintained separate and produced and best 5% selected
back-crossed in masal line

11
12/16/2010

Typical Mass Selection Program Inbreeding effects by 3rd generation

M F M F

m m m m f f f f

Inbred
Effects
(.125-.250)

Hybrid Program
M (two lines) F

Line A PL Line B

Hybrid Vigor
M F

PL

M F

Brazil
PL

12
12/16/2010

Traits selected for:


Common Unconscious Possible
Growth rate Spawning rate/Fecundity Improved FCR
(high, uniform)
Disease Early maturation Improved tail:body ratio
resistance/
survival
High stocking Spawning without Better taste, meat texture
density ablation

Zero water Adaption to local culture Tolerance to low DO levels


exchange conditions

Stress resistance Color (after cooking)

Tolerance to extreme
environments

Advantages of a Local
Breeding (Genetics) Program
Availability - year
year--round BS supply
L
Locall Selection
S l ti
Disease
Disease--free BS high biosecurity
High Quality Broodstock better than
imported broodstock
Cost Effective lower cost per unit
Traceability important for exporters
Post
Post--larvae Sales improve sales and
image

13
12/16/2010

Breeding Program Characteristics


1. Conventional no
no-nonsense
nonsense breeding program
2. Family-based (full-sibs), elastomer tagging
3. Family selection for growth and survival (Selection
Index)
4. Intense within-family selection for growth
5. Two stages of selection
6. Inbreeding management through pedigree records and
OCT-based mating plans
7. 60 x 4 = 240 families/year
8. 600 tagged animals/family

Breeding Program Outline


Establish foundation stock or lines
Mating through artificial insemination
Isolation of each spawn as an individual family
Larval rearing of each family to post-larvae
Rearing of post-larvae to 2 grams
Tagging of individuals within each family
On-Test of families in within the NBC
Family siblings exported for field trials
Family siblings for disease challenge trials
Evaluate performance data from NBC, field trials,
and disease challenge trials
Selection of top ranked families according to traits

14
12/16/2010

Batches (pure line and crosses)

Siblings for pond SPF siblings maintained at


performance evaluations Nucleus Breeding Center (NBC)

Data from
Harvested and Marketed field evaluations Top performing batches
(never return to NBC)

Top batches fast-tracked


to broodstock

Crossed w/ selected batches

Broodstock
Conditioning and
Maturation
AI

Top5familiesranked(upto200shrimpperfamily)
Top 5 families ranked (up to 200 shrimp per family)
Conditioningperiod onemonth,maturationdiet
Allbroodstocktaggedandmixedinonetank
Familiescrossedusingartificialinsemination
Toproducenextbatchof30families
Extrabroodstockcangotocommercialmaturation

15
12/16/2010

Nursery Phase

1,000 liter tanks
5000 PL12 / tank
PL12 to 2 grams
30 days of culture
one family per tank

1 6 11 16

2 7 12 17

3 8 13 18

4 9 14 19

5 10 15 20

NurseryPhase:
Postlarvae(PL12)toJuvenile(2gram)GrowoutPens

16
12/16/2010

2-3 gram Juveniles for Tagging

Pond Trials

Pond trials done in cages of 3m2 in different sites.


Survival and growth are recorded to 15 grams.
Decisions are made on which families will be used in future
generations.

17
12/16/2010

Pond Field Trial Pens

Phenotypic Data to Genetic Index

P dT i l
PondTrials
CustomSelectionProgram

Performance
GeneticNucleus
(families) DatafromBreeding Index
GenomicsData Center
5-8%
performance
f
Disease gain per year
ChallengeTest

18
12/16/2010

Conservatoriesfor
P.Vannamei

Brazil

Vietnam

42,000 broodstock / year


Batch selection program 08
150 family/year from 2010
Indoor, water recirculation
High Biosecurity
900 million PL/month
#1 producer in 2009

19
12/16/2010

Thailand

Since 2007
20,000 broodstock capacity

Malaysia Multiplication and


Breeding Program
Techno fund Grant (2 year)
20,000 broodstock / year target
2010 family selection program

20
12/16/2010

P.stylirostrisBroodstockConservatory
(proposedforNewCaledonia)
40m

20.0m pum
s p sump

u
m
p

Tanksare7metersindiameter
Greenhousedimensionsaround40metersx20meters
Transparentfilmcover

Genotyping Technology
Referenced microsatellite markers established for P. vannamei
Able to identification of individual animals in a population
Determining g relative ggenetic similarityy ((tracking
g relatedness)) between
randomly selective animals
Identification of broodstock parents of post larvae or juveniles.
Identification of siblings and half
half--siblings in a mixed
mixed--parentage spawn
Characterization and legal protection or tagging of family lines
Use as markers in Marker Assisted Selection (MAS) for genetic traits
of economic importance (growth rate, nutritional efficiency, disease
resistance etc.).
resistance, etc )
Improved breeding efficiency; reduced investment and costs

21
12/16/2010

Genotyping Technology
Application of Genetic Markers for pedigree tracking will
accelerate domestication in other shrimp species

Family A

Family B

Offspring

Recommendations for a
Commercial Breeding Program for
P. vannamei
SPF Certified P. vannamei stocks
Biosecure facility and health program
2 to 3 lines or different populations
F
Family
il or b
batch
t h genetic
ti program
Genotyping technology to determine
relatedness between lines/families

22
12/16/2010

Future Trends

Growth Rate Faster shorter cycle to target size


FCR Reduced feed cost savings
Larger Shrimp partial harvest, 30-40 g, higher price
Density 80 to 200 PL/m2 (1,000/m2 indoor culture)
Biofloc and water recirculation (zero exchange)
Biosecurity, traceability, increased food safety
Sustainability through technology
Greater social and environmental responsibility

g{t~
l
l

23

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi