UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS
TABLE OF CONTENTS Filipino Society of Composers vs. Tan, 148 SCRA 461
I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 3
(1) Basis of the Intellectual Property Law (R.A. 8293, as
amended) .................................................................................. 3
(2) Importance of Adopting Laws protecting Intellectual Property
Rights ........................................................................................ 3
(3) Philippine commitment to the GATT-TRIPS agreement .......... 3
Taada vs. Angara, G.R. No. 118295, May 2, 1997 ........... 3
(4) Did RA 8293 repeal existing laws on intellectual property? ... 3
Mirpuri vs. CA ................................................................... 3
Samson vs. Daway ........................................................... 3
(5) Intellectual Property Rights Trademark, Copyright and
Patents ...................................................................................... 3
(6) Republic Act No. 8293 Intellectual Property Law ................ 4
II. PRELIMINARY MATTERS................................................... 4
(1) State Policy Declaration ......................................................... 4
Twentieth Century Music Corp. vs. Aiken ......................... 4
Feist Publications, Inc. vs. Rural Television Services
Company ......................................................................... 4
(2) Effect on International Conventions and on Principle of
Reciprocity ................................................................................. 5
Mirpuri vs. CA ................................................................... 5
(3) Coverage of Intellectual Property Rights ............................... 5
Kho vs. CA, ....................................................................... 5
Pearl & Dean Inc. vs. Shoemart Inc ................................. 6
(4) Functions of IPO ........................................................ 6
(5) The Intellectual Property Office ............................................. 6
Pest Management Association of the Philippines vs.
Fertilizer and Pesticide Authority .................................... 6
III. LAW ON COPYRIGHT ........................................................ 6
(1) Definitions ............................................................................. 6
(2) Protection, when commenced ................................................ 7
(3) Idea/Expression Dichotomy................................................... 7
(4) Works Protected .................................................................... 7
(a) Literary or Artistic Works ................................................... 7
Columbia Pictures vs. CA, 261 SCRA 144 (1996) .............. 8
Ching vs. Salinas, G.R. No. 161295, June 29, 2005 ........... 8
(b) Derivative Works ............................................................... 8
Laktaw vs. Paglinawan, 44 Phil. 855 (1918) .................... 9
(c) Published Edition of Work .................................................. 9
(5)Works Not Protected ............................................................... 9
(a)Unprotected Subject Matter ................................................ 9
Joaquin, Jr. vs. Drilon, 302 SCRA 225 (1999) ................... 9
(b)Works of Government ......................................................... 9
(6) Copyright or Economic Rights; Ownership ........................... 10
(a) Copyright or Economic Rights Sec. 177 .......................... 10
Pearl & Dean Inc., supra ................................................. 10
Rommel A. Tio Page 1 of 21
(1987) ........................................................................... 10
Maglalang Santos vs., McCullough Printing, 12 SCRA 321
(1964) ........................................................................... 10
(b) Copyright Ownership .........................................................11
(7) Transfer or Assignment of Copyright .................................... 12
(8) Limitations of Copyright ....................................................... 12
(a) Limitations On Copyright ...................................................12
(b) Fair Use of Work ................................................................12
A&M Records Inc. vs. Napster Inc. No. 00-16401 (U.S.
Court Decision) ............................................................. 13
Habana vs. Robles G.R. No. 131522, July 19, 1999 ..........13
(c) Work of Architecture .........................................................13
(d) Reproduction of Published Work .......................................13
(e) Reprographic Reproduction by Libraries............................14
(f) Reproduction of Computer Program ...................................14
(g) Importation for Personal Purposes ...................................14
(9) Registration and Deposit with National Library and Supreme
Court Library ............................................................................ 14
(10) Moral Rights ....................................................................... 15
(a) Scope of Moral Rights ........................................................15
(b) Breach of Contract ............................................................15
(c) Waiver of Moral Rights ......................................................15
(d) Contribution to Collective Work .........................................15
(e) Term of Moral Rights .........................................................15
(11) Rights to Proceed in Subsequent Transfers ........................ 15
(a) Sale or Lease of Work ........................................................15
(12) Rights of Performers, Producers of Sound Recordings and
Broadcasting Organizations ...................................................... 15
(a) Definitions .........................................................................15
(b) Scope of Performers Rights ..............................................16
(c) Moral Rights of Performers ................................................16
(d) Limitation on Performers Rights .......................................16
(e) Additional Remuneration for Subsequent Communications
or Broadcasts ........................................................................ 16
(f) Contract Terms ..................................................................16
(g) Scope of Right on Sound Recordings .................................16
(h) Communication to the Public on Sound Recordings ...........17
(i) Scope of Right of Broadcasting Organizations ....................17
(j) Limitations on Rights .........................................................17
ABS-CBN vs. Phil. Multi-Media System Inc. .....................17
(13) Term of Protection in General ............................................ 17
(a) Term of Protection ............................................................17
(i) Joint Authorship ..........................................................18
(ii) Anonymous or Pseudonymous Works ............................18
(iii) Works of Applied Art .................................................18
(iv) Photographic Works ..................................................18
(v)Audio-visual Works .....................................................18
(vi) Calculation of Terms ..................................................18
(b) Term of Protection for Performers, Producers and
Broadcasting Organizations ................................................... 18
(14) Infringement ...................................................................... 18
(a) How committed .................................................................18
Microsoft Corp. vs. Hwang ...............................................18
Microsoft Corp. vs. Maxicorp Inc .....................................19
(b) Remedies for Infringement ...............................................19
Habana vs. Robles ...........................................................19
Columbia Pictures Inc. vs. CA, supra ...............................19
(c) Criminal Penalties .............................................................19
(d) Affidavit Evidence .............................................................20
(e) Presumption of Authorship ................................................20
Bayanihan Music Phils., Inc. vs. BMG Records .................20
(f) International Registration of Works...................................21
(15) Points of Attachment of Rights ........................................... 21
Intellectual Property Law
 UNIVERSITY OF SAN CARLOS

(a)For Literary and Artistic Works and Derivative Works ........ 21

Pearl & Dean Inc. vs. Shoemart Inc. ............................... 21
(b) For Performers .................................................................. 21
(c) Of Sound Recordings ......................................................... 21
(d) For Broadcast .................................................................... 21

Rommel A. Tio Page 2 of 21 Intellectual Property Law

Thank you for using www.freepdfconvert.com service!

Only two pages are converted. Please Sign Up to convert all pages.

https://www.freepdfconvert.com/membership