FILIPINO Filipino n y being at the held at the inevitably

PSYCHO characteristi n ) In the 1960s, dishonest University of Abelardo culture-

cs, and i many and socially the Auditorium bound, the
LOGY explaining n From the Filipino ingratiating Philippines at U.P. In picture of the
them g beginning of intellectuals and (U.P.), Dr. this Filipino has
Sikolohiyang through the s the periods and scholars reflecting a Alfredo V. conference, been
Pilipino eyes of the when the were already deceptive Lagmay, the ideas, inaccurate, if
(Filipino native o Philippines sensitive verbal Enriquez concepts, not distorted.
psychology) Filipino. f was both to the description embarked on and
refers to the Among the colonized by inadequacy of reality a research formulations Enriquez
psychology outcomes S Spain, and as well as (Lawless, into the of (1985) later
born out of are: a body i then the the 1969, cited historical Sikolohiyang defined
the of k USA, unfairness of in Enriquez, and cultural Pilipino were Sikolohiyang
experience, knowledge o academic the Western- 1992) rather roots of formally Pilipino as
thought and including l psychology, oriented than a Philippine articulated. the study of
orientation indigenous o or the approaches concern for Psychology. diwa
of the concepts, h psychology to the feelings What is (psyche),
Filipinos, development i taught in psychology. of others. From these Sikolohiyan which in
based on of y schools, was For instance, researches, g Pilipino Filipino
the full use indigenous a predominantl in the area of It was in the a two- directly
of Filipino research n y Western in personality, early 1970s volume Sikolohiyang refers to the
culture and methods g theory and in the Western that this was bibliography Pilipino is wealth of
language. and methodology approach in initiated on Filipino anchored on ideas
The indigenous P . Many research of when Virgilio psychology Filipino referred to
approach is personality i Filipino not being Gaspar and a locally thought and by the
one of testing, new l intellectuals, enmeshed Enriquez developed experience philosophical
indigenizati directions in i notably the and bound returned to personality as concept of
on from teaching p two by the the test, understood essence
within psychology, i Philippine culture being Philippines Panukat ng from a and an entire
whereby the and an n heroes Jose studied has from Ugali at Filipino range of
theoretical active o Rizal and resulted in a Northwester Pagkatao perspective psychologica
framework participation Apolinario characterizat n University, (Measure of (Enriquez, l concepts
and in ( Mabini, ion of the USA with a Character 1975). The from
methodology organization F expressed Filipino from Ph.D. in and most awareness
emerge from s among i dissatisfactio the Social Personality), important to motives to
the Filipino l n at the judgmental Psychology were aspect of behavior.
experiences psychologist i pejorative and and lost no produced. In this definition
of the s and social p interpretation impressionist time in 1975, is the Filipino It must be
people from scientists, i s of Filipino ic point of introducing Enriquez orientation. stressed at
the both in the n behavior by view of the the concept chaired the For the outset
indigenous Philippines o Western colonizers of Unang centuries, though that
culture. It is and observers. (Enriquez, Sikolohiyang Pambansan Filipino developing a
based on overseas. p This 1992, p. 57). Pilipino g behavior has particularistic
assessing s disenchantm For example, (Filipino Kumperensy been psychology
historical T y ent the Psychology). a sa analyzed such as
and socio- h c continued as predispositio Together Sikolohiyang and Filipino
cultural e h Filipinos n to with then- Pilipino (First interpreted in psychology
realities, o struggled to indirectness chairman of National the light of is not anti-
understandi b l assert their of Filipino the Conference Western universal
ng the local e o national and communicati Department on Filipino theories. inasmuch as
language, g g cultural on was of Psychology) Since these the ultimate
unraveling i identity. regarded as Psychology which was theories are aim of
Sikolohiyang of the psychology Sikolohiya behavior in a y hi It
Pilipino is to originally of language ng mga (another particular c li al
contribute to borrowed and culture. Pilipino meaning of culture (or h p s
universal test was It is thus (psychology diwa), and context) may ol pi o
psychology, produced. concerned of the the soul result to an o n m
which can be On the other with proper Filipinos (kaluluwa) incorrect g e ai
realized only hand, applications theorizing which is the interpretatio y c nt
if each group another type to health, about the way to n of ones th o ai
of people is of agriculture, psychologica learning behavior at nt n
adequately indigenizatio art, mass l nature of about and thinking p e s
understood n was given media, the Filipinos, peoples er xt m
by more religion, and whether from conscience. Major p It e
themselves emphasis other a local or a (Enriquez, Characteris et is nt
and from after the spheres of foreign 1976) tics of of u c al
their own translation peoples perspective). Sikolohiyan at o is
perspective. attempts daily life. Sikolohiyang g Pilipino e n m
Sikolohiyang failed to Enriquez Pilipino is s c -
Pilipino is a capture or In his 1975 searched the anchored on Id c er b
step towards express a article on the Filipino Filipino e ol n e
contributing truly Filipino bases of culture and thought and nt o e h
to universal psychology. Sikolohiyang history for experience it ni d a
psychology. This is called Pilipino on the bases of as y al wi vi
indigenizatio culture and Sikolohiyang understood a st th or
Initial work n from within history Pilipino from a n at b is
on (as against (Enriquez, instead of Filipino d u ot m
developing indigenizatio 1975) and a tracing these perspective n s h a
Sikolohiyang n from 1976 article back to (Enriquez, at of s p
Pilipino without), on Western 1975). io th ci pr
concentrated which means perspectives theories. He Sikolohiyang n e e o
on a type of looking for and came up Pilipino is al Fi n a
indigenizatio the directions of with a the scientific c li c c
n which is indigenous Sikolohiyang definition of study of o pi e h
based psychology Pilipino psychology psychology n n a It
largely on from within (Enriquez, that takes derived from s o n is
simple the culture 1976), he into account the ci P d n
translation of itself and not distinguished the study of experience, o s h ot
concepts, just clothing Sikolohiyang emotions ideas, and u y u in
methods, a foreign Pilipino and cultural s c m c
theories and body with a (Filipino experienced orientation of n h a o
measures local dress. psychology) knowledge Filipinos. e ol ni n
into Filipino. from (kalooban s o st si
For example, The principal Sikolohiya and Why s gi ic st
psychologica emphasis of sa Pilipinas kamalayan), Sikolohiyan It c a e
l tests were Sikolohiyang (psychology awareness g Pilipino? s al p nt
translated Pilipino is to in the of ones a pr pr wi
into the local foster Philippines surroundings Application g a o th
language, national the general (ulirat), of concepts ai ct a a
modified in identity and form of information and n ic c u
content, so consciousne psychology and measureme st e h ni
that a ss, social in the understandin nts which a in e v
Philippine- involvement, Philippine g (isip), are not p a s er
type version and context) and habits and appropriate s P s
 al at these N R G also q A /
p values using O E A yourself) u O ci
s a Filipino R L L th e / vi
y orientation. M A A e m O li
c THE CORE O TI N c or U t
h VALUES F O / or al T y
ol R N D e o SI )
o 1. CORE E S I of bl D M
g VALUE/KA C H G Fi ig E a
y PWA IP IP N li at R ki
(Shared R ( IT pi io H S
Developme Identity) O SI Y n n I A
nt of 2. PIVOTAL C R K o to N L
indigenous INTERPER IT ) A p tr D A
concepts SONAL Y 5.CONFRO T s e I M
and VALUE/PA P NTATIVE A y at IB U
theories KIRAMDAM A SURFACE R c o A H
(Shared KI VALUES U h n N A
There is a Inner KI B N ol e G (
good deal of Perception) S A G o a T m
literature on 3. LINKING A H A g n A ix
the Filipino SOCIO- M A N y, ot O i
personality PERSONAL A L /J it h / n
which has VALUE/KA A A U is er O g
become GANDAHA N N S h a N )
available. NG LOOB D A/ TI u s E M
The Filipino (Shared P F C m e - a
personality is Humanity) A A E a q O ki
a popular 4. KI T K n u F- L
area of study ACCOMOD KI A A e al U A
of many ATIVE P LI L n fe S H
foreign SURFACE A S A e ll O
scholars who VALUES G TI Y s o AMON K
came to the H K C A s w G (j
Philippines. IY A P A at h OUTSIDER o
A/ P A N th u S: i
Rethinking S W S /F e m M n
Filipino H A/ SI R hi a a i
values A S V E g n ki n
M M E E h b T g
Enriquez E O N D e ei U )
was critical U O E O st n N M
of this T T S M le g G a
approach to A H S v s O ki
the study of N I 6. KAPWA el TWO ( B
Filipino G N SOCIETAL (SHARED i CATEGORI c A
values. He N T VALUES IDENTITY) m ES o G
encouraged A E K (Shared pl IB u A
Filipino L R A Inner Self, ie A rt Y
scholars to O N R The other s N e (
take a O A A person is u G s a
second look B/ L N ni T y
 d A Participatory ti in in e n pt
a Y Sensitivity) v m g . e a
p A A e e L s bl
ti N u to nt Accomodati y s e
n G ni T al ve Surface n of a
g - q h ro Value: c b ct
) L u er le HIYA h ei io
M O e e - Hi (1 n n.
a O s is pl y 9 g
ki B o a a 6 in A
S ci h yi - 1) a n
A (rappo al e n Si s s dr
M rt/mut s si g bl a o e
A ual kil ta e w ci s
( trust) l ti KAGANDA y hi al (1
g M in o HANG (1 y ly 9
e a h n LOOB 9 a u 9
tt ki er to SHARED 6 a n 4)
i S e re HUMANITY 5) s a d
n A nt a (Pagkamak , t c e
g N in ct atao) a h c s
a G Fi , g n e e cr
l K li at e A u pt ib
o O pi te n m n a e
n T n nt ui er c bl d
g o io n ic o e hi
w (involv p n e a m p y
it ement er to a n fo o a
h /joinin s s ct s rt si a
/ g o u s c a ti s
u others n bt of h bl o
n ) h le g ol e n, a
it M o c e ar fe or n
e a o u n , el p in
d ki d. e er tr in er gr
) I A s o a g fo e
S re a si n th r di
AMON A q n ty sl at m e
G u d , at a in nt
INSID e n ki e c g in
(onen
ERS: st o n d c a w
ess,
M to n- d hi o s h
unity
a fe v n y m o y
with)
ki el er e a p ci Fi
P or b s a a al li
PAKIRAMD
A to al s s ni ly pi
AM
G b b a e u n
(Knowing
P e e n s s n o
Through
A s h d h a a s
Feeling or
L e a c a w c o
Tacit
A n vi ar m ar c v
Knowing;
G si or e e er
s bt it si c st , e fo
p s ti o ill k d ll
e B fo o m ot a b o
n o r n) e h hi y wi
d ni m , s e hi K n
d fa ik n r y a g
ur ci n in e fo a ut K
in o a a g r n ( a
g (1 k hi at m (s 1 ut
fi 9 a y iv s, e 9 s
e 7 k a e, it n 6 lo
st 6) a ( e. c s 1 gi
a al hi b g. a e ) c,
s er y e , n of a a
in te a e n ei pr s s
or d ( m a th o t
d u e b p er pr d h
er s m a a b ie e e
to to b rr hi e ty bt pr
pl th a a y p , of in
e e rr s a; o or g ci
a di a s w si e r pl
s ff s e it ti m at e
e er si d h v b it of
th e n w ot e ar u re
ei nt g it h or ra d ci
r m ), h e n s e pr
vi e n s rs e s . o
si a a o , g m A ci
to ni p m p at e n ty
rs n a e o iv nt dr in
, g hi o si e ). e c
e s y n ti d s ur
v of a e v e UTANG NA (1 re
e th ( ), e, p LOOB 9 d
n e pl et e. e U 9 w
to w a c. g. n ta 4, h
th or c W , di n p e
e d e it m n g p. n
e hi d h a g n 1 a
xt y in s hi o a 9 n
e a a o y n lo 0 in
nt d n m ai th o di
of e a e n e b 1 vi
g p w af (s c w 9 d
oi e k fi h o a 1) u
n n w x y) nt s d al
g di a e ; e tr ef h
in n r s, a xt a in el
to g d it n , n e p
d o p b d e. sl d s
e n o e in g. at it, a
 n fa L a e li o n b
ot v o n s, pi m o y
h or o s b n e v g
er is ki e o c al oi
. fo n gr c in o u n
H rc g at a te u e, g
ol e at it u rp nt gi al
ln d ut u s er ry vi o
st t a d e s . n n
ei o n e/ in o g g
n s g s th n PAKIKISAM it wi
er h n ol e al A th th
(1 o a id Fi re P e th
9 w lo ar li la a E e
6 hi o it pi ti ki n gr
1) s b y n o ki gl o
to (s m . o n s is u
o ic o It p s a h p
k ) r is at hi m tr or
th gr e n te p a a th
is at cl ot rn s w n e
in it o n of th a sl m
te u s e in at s at aj
rp d el c te bi id io or
re e y e rp n e n it
ta pr in s er d nt of y
ti o th s s s ifi m d
o p e ar o a e ai e
n er c ily n p d nt ci
fu ly o a al er b ai si
rt b nt b re s y ni o
h y e ur la o L n n,
er re xt d ti n y g i.
b tu of e o to n s e.
y rn Fi n n hi c m ,
cl in li a s. s h o c
ai g pi s It or ( ot o
m th n th is h 1 h nf
in e o e a er 9 in or
g fa c w b h 6 te m
th v ul or e o 1, rp ity
at or tu d a m 1 er .
th w r ut e 9 s
e it e, d if c 7 o Bahala na
re h it e ul o 3 n (Confrontati
ci in a bt el m ) al ve Surface
pi te ct e m a re Value)
e r u c m u s la H
nt e al o e ni a ti a
of st ly n nt ty Fi o s
th . m n of or li n n
e e ot Fi h pi s o
 e u Fi to e e ll ch tru
x e li G d te d is e
a b pi o th lli o phy wor
ct y n d. at n th sic th,
E c o b g ei al, cha
n o at B a th r suc ract
gl m tit a h e b h er,
is p u h al m e as ach
h ar d al a s st that iev
tr in e a n el to bes em
a g th n a v a tow ent
n it at a is e c ed and
sl wi m a n s hi thro suc
at th a n ot th e ugh ces
io A k g f at v co s.
n m e D at th e mpl O
B er s iy al e th ime th
o ic hi o is y ei nts er
st a m s m ar r or e
ro n a ( e o app x
m fa c G b re bj lau a
(1 ta c o ut a e ses m
9 lis e d d ct for pl
6 m pt w d y iv a e
8) T s ill et to e goo s
w h uf ta e fa s d of
a o fe k r c perf in
s m ri e m e Internality orm te
th a n c in th and anc rn
e s g a at e Externality e, al
fir A s r io di Component thu it
st n a e n ffi s of s y-
p dr n of a c Filipino ext e
s e d u n ul Personality ern xt
y s pr s) d t P al er
c d o . ri si u n
h ef bl .. s tu ri Dangal al
ol in e L k- at o is it
o e m a ta io r ho y
gi s s, g ki n D nor in
st b le m n b a fro cl
to a a a g ef n m u
a h vi y . or g wit d
n al n (1 R e al hin e
al a g 9 at th s
y n e 7 h e Puri kno s
z a v 7) er m ref wle a
e a er e , , ers dg y
th s yt x th a to e a
is t hi pl e n ho of a
v h n ai y d nor on n
al e g n ar wi whi es d
li a u e e s an administratio testing of the
g a e v v o d n procedures projective
a n s al al ci were also type in the
y d u u o- kalayaan adapted to 1960s.
a d hiya(pro e e p (fr Filipino ways
fo a pri s. kap er ee (Enriquez & They further
r m ety/ H wa s do Guanzon, noted that
th d dig e (s o m 1985). the 1970s
e a nity e har n Developme saw tests
E m ) m ed al nt of Cipres- developed in
n fo p ide v indigenous Ortega and creativity,
gl r utang na h ntit al personality Guanzon- self-
is f loo a y) u measures Lapena perception,
h e b si a e (1997) personality
w el (gr z s In the area documented and
o . atit e pi kaganda of Filipino and vocational
r ud d v ha Personality, organized testing, and
d The e/s ot ng- Enriquez, the the 1980s an
Sikolohiyan olid bahala al loo together with information increased
h g Pilipino arit na in b PPRH, on both interest in
a perspective y) (d te (s developed published personality
p on the an ete rp har the Panukat and testing, with
pi Filipino d rmi er ed ng Ugali at unpublished a number of
n behaviour nati s hu Pagkatao work in the researchers
e patterns pakikisa on o ma (PUP) area of doing
s and value ma ), n nity (Measure of psychologica studies on
s structure (c al ) Character l the Filipino
; a om sama/lak v a and measuremen child and the
pi s pa as al s Personality) t, and saw a Filipino
gi c nio ng u s in 1975 recent adolescent.
l ol nsh loo e o which upsurge in And in the
a o ip/e b ci utilized the 1990s, tests
n ni ste (re Pakikira et dimensions development were
d al em sen md al of of developed to
ti /a ); tm am v personality indigenous measure a
m c and ent (s al that are psychologica wide variety
pi c a /gu har u relevant to l measures. of Filipino
fo o s ts) ed e Filipinos. Interest has characteristi
r m c an inn s grown by cs
m o d er While leaps and katalinuhan
c o nf per karangal psychologica bounds from [intelligence],
o d r pakikiba cep an l testing is of the handful pagkarelihiy
nt at o ka tion (di Western of tests in oso
r iv nt (re ) gnit origin, the educational [religiosity],
ol e at sist a y), substance of psychology kaasalang
; s iv anc s the PUP which were sekswal
a ur e e) li katarung originated locally [sexual
n fa s a n an from an developed in behavior],
d c ur s ki (ju understandin the 1950s, to kakayahang
d e fa c n stic g of the the interest magdala ng
a v c or g e), Filipinos. in tensyon
m al The test personality [ability to
handle study on suppositionle in fi s d H d
stress], pagkalalaki ss approach te c of er in er
pagkamaba (no to social ra a in ) di st
hala equivalent in scientific ct nt te a - a
[anxiety], English, but investigation io ly ra n Ib n
kahustuhang approximatel s. As implied n d ct d a di
emosyonal y, it means by the term or et io H n n
[emotional masculinity itself, re er n in g g,
stability], , pakapa- la m ar di - ra
kakayahang maleness, kapa is an ti in e - T p
berbal sa manhood, approach o e th Ib a p
Filipino or all of characterize n s e a o, or
[verbal ability these) for a d by groping, s th s n w t)
in Filipino], class under searching hi e a g hi s
Filipino Enriquez. and probing p q m - c h
management into an th u e T h o
style, This study unsystematiz at al o a is ul
dementia was to be ed mass of e it n o p d
screening, the turning social and xi y e ( a b
empathy, point in cultural data st of s O ki e
and Philippine to obtain s th a n ki re
trustworthine social order, b e s e- p a
ss, to name research for meaning and et d th of a c
a few it was in her directions for w at e - g h
(Cipres- articles research e a k u p e
Ortega & (Santiago, (Torres, e o a s al d,
Guanzon- 1975, 1977) 1982, p. n bt p ). a at
Lapena, that the 171). th ai w It g th
1997) pakapa- e n a is a e
kapa There are re e cl re y m
Developme (groping) at least five s d a c a in
nt of approach basic e in s o n i
indigenous was first guiding ar th si m g m
research introduced. principles c e fi m - u
methods relevant to h re c e lo m
In searching the use of er s at n o ,
The impact for indigenous a e io d b in
of appropriate perspective n ar n e (l or
Sikolohiyang research in general, d c s d e d
Pilipino was methods that and th h th v er
greatly felt in are indigenous e pr Ib at el to
the area of indigenous research re o a th of b
social to Filipino methods in s c n e m e
research experience, particular. e e g fir ut a
methods. In Filipino ar s - st u s
1975, scholars 1. T c s T le al s
Carmen have learned h h T a v tr ur
Santiago, a to assume e e h o el u e
postgraduate the pakapa- le d e ( u st d
student of kapa v si le O n , of
psychology perspective, el g v ut d u g
at U.P., did a a of ni el si er n o
 o a el m ia e in socio- thus
d s fa . te to teaching, cultural approximatin
q e re 4. T n a research conditions g the laws of
u q of h e d and in the affecting universality.
al u th e s a conduct of women in
it al e m s pt various Philippine Two Types
y , re et to to conferenc society. of
d if s h th e es and 5. In Indigenizati
at n e o e xi symposia industry on
a. ot ar d p st in particularl
2. R s c to o in Psycholog y in the 1. In
e u h b p g y marketing di
s p p e ul c 2. The of specific g
e er ar u at ul work of products e
ar io ti s io tu Bulatao in and ni
c r ci e n ra appropriat understan z
h p d (a l e ding at
p a a in n n technique consumer io
ar fe nt a d or s in behavior. n
ti ll s re n m therapy fr
ci o ta s ot s. suited to Towards o
p w k e s 5. The the Universal m
a h e ar o lang Filipino Psychology W
nt u pr c p uag personalit Through it
s m e h hi e of y Indigenizati h
s a c s st the 3. Provi on o
h n e h ic peo ding ut
o b d o at ple psycholog We put
ul ei e ul io shou ical help forward now tr
d n n d n ld be to children that what is a
al g c b of the in generally n
w a e e th lang especially considered s
a n o c e uag difficult as p
y d v h m e of circumsta universal or
s n er o et rese nce psychology ti
b ot th s h arch 4. Femin is based on n
e lik e e o at all ist the g
tr e d n d) time psycholog psychology p
e a at o a s. y social of s
at a n n and industrialized y
e g o th d Areas of clinical and c
d ui bt e it Application psycholog developed h
b n ai b s s of ists have countries of ol
y e n a h Sikolohiyan helped the West. o
re a e si o g Pilipino battered This gi
s pi d s ul 1. Early women psychology c
e g fr of d work was understan aims to be a al
ar o a b focused d their science th
c 3. T m p e on the problems comparable e
h h th pr m use of the in the light to that of the or
er e e o a local of the natural ie
s w pr d language different sciences, s,
 c io e na may u s al n d
o n d pagkiling sa g n ik g at
n fr g pangangaila n a si p o
c o e. ngang a m k a s
e m sensitibo sa y a s g n
pt W mga Pilipino. a k a bi a
s, it It n u k bi m
a hi o ay s k al g a
n n naglalayong a u a a k
d pangalagaan p h h y u
m c ang a a o n k
et ul tunguhan ng gi s k g u
h tu mananaliksik ta a d h
o re at kalahok n p is at a
d a na hindi n a a o m
s, s isinasaalang g n n s. ul
a s Katutubong -alang ang m a g 3. In a
n o Pamamara kapakanan a n k u s
d ur an ng ng kalahok n al a u a
m c Pnanaliksik at ang datos a ik p n k
o e (KPP) sa ngalan ng n si w a a
di of agham al k a a ni
fy k ik 2. M ta n la
in n Mga si a o g .
g o Pinapalaga k h at k 4. K
th wl y ng KPP at al hi a ai
e e k a n p la
m d 1. Iti al g di a n
to g n a a g k g
fit e at h n ui a a
to to a o g n n n
lo c k k p e a g
c o d a a a n pi
al m a n nt pi n lii
c e n g a g g n
ul u g bi y n m a
tu p a s a a g n
ra wi nt a n a a g
l th B a at g n k m
c cr unga ng s h p g al et
o o karanasan n u at ta a o
nt s sa loob ng g s ur n h d
e s- SP, ang in a in gi o o
xt c katutubong te y g n k n
. ul pamamaraa ra n n g k g
2. In tu ng k g g p a p
di ra pananliksik s m m a y a
g l (KPP) ay y g a p s n
e k mga o a n el a a
ni n pamamaraa n d a a s n
z o n sa o at n y a al
at wl pananaliksik o a
ik o g a g g m h e
si s p n P m g o a
k a a a at a a d) bl
b k n n ut n k -s e
at ul a al u a al e to
a tu n ik n n a ar o
y ra al si g al h c bt
s at ik k u ik o hi ai
a k si s h si k. n n
k a k. a a k g, or
a u si n s pr d
a g 2 Modelo k n a o er
n al ng ol g k bi ,
g ia Pananaliksi o M a n m
k n. k hi a n g e
u 5. K 1 Is y n y in a
p ai k a a a to ni
a la al s n n a n
n n a a al g Indige n g,
ni g n p ik p nous u a
to a g a si a Resea n n
s n M gt k g rch s d
a g a at at - Metho y di
m a n a K a ds st re
g n a r al a e ct
a g n o a r 1. P m io
ta wi al k h al A at n
o k ik n o n K iz s
at a si g k g A e fo
k n k di - di P d r
o g - w M w A m re
nt ta M a g a - a s
e u et n a n K s e
k m o g m g A s ar
st b d K et Pi P of c
o, a o al o li A s h
at y n a d pi - o 2. P
k a g h o n m ci A
ai n gi o n o e al K
la a n k g s a a I
n n a gi a n n K
g g g n p s d I
a m a a a gr c P
n a m g m o ul A
g gi it a a pi tu G
ia n n m m n ra -
n g g it a g l K
g wi is 2 Is n gi (fi d U
k k a k g ta el at W
o a n al is n d a E
p n g a a n m to N
it m n n g et b T
U o s u st in h K a
H it o m b te er I c
A is ci a et r s S c
N a al n w m to A or
- s pr d e s th L d
A h o ai e of e A wi
n ar c ly n a p M th
o in e a th ct ar U /l
c g s ct e s ti H e
c of s ivi re a ci A v
a b of ti s n p - el
si el e e e d a in of
o ie x s. ar w nt te c
n fs c 3. P c or s ra o
fo , h A h d pl ct nf
r th a K er s a io or
e o n I a 4. P c n m
x u gi K n A e wi in
c g n I d G to th g
h ht g P th D e 7. P 9. P
a s, in A e A st A A
n a fo G p L a K K
g n r P ar A bl I I
e d m A ti W is K K
of e at L ci - h IL I
in x io A p D ra A S
fo p n, G a A p H A
r er th A nt L p O M
m ie o Y s, A or K A
at n u A h W t -p -
io c g N e 5. P ar b
n, e ht G si re A ti ei
id s. s, - ta fe K ci n
e A a L ti rs I p g
a n n O o to K at al
s, in d O n fr I io o
in fo k B a e T n n
si r n n q U wi g
g m o th d u N th wi
ht al wl is ti e G 8. P th
s, , e di m nt O A /l
a fr d s id vi - K e
n e g pl it si ci I v
d e, e a y ts vil K el
o a th y ar of it I of
pi s at s e th y B a
ni w is m s e wi A dj
o el p ut et re th G u
n l ar u a s 6. P A st
s a t al si e A Y in
al s of tr d ar K -i g
s a h u e c I n
10. P a o e, p ki ( n it
A n n it s n S si ut
K d c al c al o o io
I e e s o a ci n n.
K at pt o n k o- c
I s s s si h p or Kinalakhan
P wi in er d a ol re k
A th th v er n, iti s in
N th is e e (c c p al
U e m d d ul al o a
L h o a a tu or n k
A o d s s ra ig d h
Y st er fu n l in s a
A n el ot di s) to n
N NATIO er fo o m , th
- NAL a r n e w e (c
R IDENT H th e n hi n ul
e ITY a e of si c ar tu
si O s o u o h ro r
di n b p s n) c w al
n e e pr . ; or d r
g of e e a re ef o
in th n s Three n s in ot
th e th si Dimensions d p iti s)
e m e o of Being a k o o ,
re o ra n Filipino a n n r
s st lly a pi m d of e
e c in n n al s ci v
ar o g d a a to ti ol
c m cr di g y a z v
h pl y s m a s e e
s e of cr ul n, o n s
et x, th i a (p ci s a
ti e e m n, s o- hi r
n v c in (s y p p o
g. e ol at o c ol a u
R n o io ci h iti s n
e m ni n o- ol c st d
s o z of p o al at p
e st e in ol gi di e ar
ar hi d di iti c m d ti
c g B vi c al e in ci
h hl ut d al di n th p
er y at u di m si e at
liv c th al m e o 1 io
e o e s e n n. 9 n
s, nt s a n si T 8 a
sl e a n si o hi 7 n
e st m d o n) s C d
e e e gr n) . di o b
p d, ti o ; m n ei
s c m u Pinagmulan e st n
 g u el th within and to s pi
i s f is Pilipino without): th a n
m n a m sa e n o
m e s e Pa Filipino as s d s
er s Fi m nga a social el l a
s s) li b lan category f a p
e . pi er L L li a
d T n s An image of a o a m n
in h o, hi passive o b L g
a e a p citizen b a a al
c re c re s li a
ul s c Babaw at Individual may fe is m n
tu p e Lalim accept or rs c w
ra o pt (Surface recogniz to o o
is
l n a and Depth): e that he th n ul
u
m s n Filipinones or she is o si d
s
ili e c s as an a Filipino s d i
e
e s e ethical but may e er m
d
u in of standard not be id e pl
to
a th m involved e d y
si
c is e Fi in a a a
g
k di m li activities s s s
ni
n m b pi that th irr u
fy
o e er n highlight at el p
th
wl n s o the ar e er
e
e si hi - identity. e v fi
gr
d o p n d a ci
a
g n in e Pilipino e nt al
d
e ar th s sa e a (
at
d e e s Pus m n m
io
a a c re o e d a
n
s s at fe d u b
of
Fi s e rs Someone who i ni a
in
li o g to consider m m b
te
pi ci or th s p p a
gr
n at y e Filipino- or or w
at
o. e F q ness a ta ta )
io
Kamalayan d ili u convictio nt nt in
n
k wi pi al n a te
in
a th n it n 3 Elements gr
to
m a o y Filipino-ness d of Filipino at
th
al w , of has re Personhoo io
e
a ar a b become le d n
lo
y e n ei internaliz v L a
o
a n d n ed or a o n
b.
n e al g integrate nt o d
T
(c s s Fi d with in b Pi
h
o s o li the loob. re , li
u
n of pr pi la l pi
s,
s th id n Loob at ti a n
Pi
ci e e o. Labas o b o
li
o s in (From n a s
 a Pi c c
p li k e:
u pi of
s n it L
o o T o
w s h o
o a u b
ul p s, c
d a th a
s n e n
u g lo m
g al o a
g a b ni
e n s fe
st a g st
a n al it
d d a s
e Pi w el
e li is f
p pi re o
er n c nl
( o o y
m s g th
al a ni r
al p z o
i u e u
m s d g
) o o h
in li nl s
te e y o
gr in w m
at th h e
io e e fo
n a n r
in ct it m
to ivi is of
th ty m e
e (g a xt
lo al ni er
o a fe n
b. w st al
T ) e iz
h of d at
e th in io
di e th n
ff lo e
er o la
e b b
n or a
c th s
e e si
in la n