Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Close
New
Medscape is available in 5 Language Editions Choose your Edition here.
Edition English
English
Deutsch
Espaol
Franais
Portugus
close
Please confirm that you would like to log out of Medscape. If you log out, you will be required to enter your username and password the
next time you visit. Log out Cancel
Search Medscape
No Results
Overview
Overview
Chest trauma is a significant source of morbidity and mortality in the United States. This article
focuses on chest trauma caused by blunt mechanisms. Penetrating thoracic injuries are
addressed in Penetrating Chest Trauma.
Blunt injury to the chest can affect any one or all components of the chest wall and thoracic cavity.
These components include the bony skeleton (ribs, clavicles, scapulae, and sternum), the lungs
and pleurae, the tracheobronchial tree, the esophagus, the heart, the great vessels of the chest,
and the diaphragm. In the subsequent sections, each particular injury and injury pattern resulting
from blunt mechanisms is discussed. The pathophysiology of these injuries is elucidated, and
diagnostic and treatment measures are outlined.
Trauma is the leading cause of death, morbidity, hospitalization, and disability in Americans aged
1 year to the middle of the fifth decade of life. As such, it constitutes a major health care problem.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 126,438 deaths occurred from
unintentional injury in 2011.[1]
Frequency
Trauma is responsible for more than 100,000 deaths annually in the United States.[1] Estimates of
thoracic trauma frequency indicate that injuries occur in 12 persons per 1 million population per
day. Approximately 33% of these injuries necessitate hospital admission. Overall, blunt thoracic
injuries are directly responsible for 20-25% of all deaths, and chest trauma is a major contributor in
another 50% of deaths.
Etiology
By far the most important cause of significant blunt chest trauma is motor vehicle accidents
(MVAs). MVAs account for 70-80% of such injuries. As a result, preventive strategies to reduce
MVAs have been instituted in the form of speed limit restriction and the use of restraints.
Pedestrians struck by vehicles, falls, and acts of violence are other causative mechanisms. Blast
injuries can also result in significant blunt thoracic trauma.
Pathophysiology
The major pathophysiologies encountered in blunt chest trauma involve derangements in the flow
of air, blood, or both in combination. Sepsis due to leakage of alimentary tract contents, as in
esophageal perforations, also must be considered.
Blunt trauma commonly results in chest wall injuries (eg, rib fractures). The pain associated with
these injuries can make breathing difficult, and this may compromise ventilation. Direct lung
injuries, such as pulmonary contusions (see the image below), are frequently associated with
major chest trauma and may impair ventilation by a similar mechanism. Shunting and dead space
ventilation produced by these injuries can also impair oxygenation.
Clinical
The clinical presentation of patients with blunt chest trauma varies widely and ranges from minor
reports of pain to florid shock. The presentation depends on the mechanism of injury and the
organ systems injured.
Obtaining as detailed a clinical history as possible is extremely important in the assessment of a
patient who has sustained blunt thoracic trauma. The time of injury, mechanism of injury,
estimates of MVA velocity and deceleration, and evidence of associated injury to other systems
(eg, loss of consciousness) are all salient features of an adequate clinical history. Information
should be obtained directly from the patient whenever possible and from other witnesses to the
accident if available.
For the purposes of this discussion, blunt thoracic injuries may be divided into the following three
broad categories:
A concise exegesis of the clinical features of each condition in these categories is presented. This
classification is used in subsequent sections to outline indications for medical and surgical
therapy for each condition.
Relevant Anatomy
The thorax is bordered superiorly by the thoracic inlet, just cephalad to the clavicles. The major
arterial blood supply to and venous drainage from the head and neck pass through the thoracic
inlet.
The thoracic outlets form the superolateral borders of the thorax and transmit branches of the
thoracic great vessels that supply blood to the upper extremities. The nerves that make up the
brachial plexus also access the upper extremities via the thoracic outlet. The veins that drain the
arm (of which the most important is the axillary vein) empty into the subclavian vein, which returns
to the chest via the thoracic outlet.
Inferiorly, the pleural cavities are separated from the peritoneal cavity by the hemidiaphragms.
Communication routes between the thorax and abdomen are supplied by the diaphragmatic
hiatuses, which allow egress of the aorta, esophagus, and vagal nerves into the abdomen and
ingress of the vena cava and thoracic duct into the chest.
The chest wall is composed of layers of muscle, bony ribs, costal cartilages, sternum, clavicles,
and scapulae. In addition, important neurovascular bundles course along each rib, containing an
intercostal nerve, artery, and vein. The inner lining of the chest wall is the parietal pleura. The
visceral pleura invests the lungs. Between the visceral and parietal pleurae is a potential space,
which, under normal conditions, contains a small amount of fluid that serves mainly as a lubricant.
The lungs occupy most of the volume of each hemithorax. Each is divided into lobes. The right
lung has three lobes, and the left lung has two lobes. Each lobe is further divided into segments.
The trachea enters through the thoracic inlet and descends to the carina at thoracic vertebral level
4, where it divides into the right and left mainstem bronchi. Each mainstem bronchus divides into
lobar bronchi. The bronchi continue to arborize to supply the pulmonary segments and
subsegments.
The heart is a mediastinal structure contained within the pericardium. The right atrium receives
blood from the superior vena cava and the inferior vena cava. Right atrial blood passes through
the tricuspid valve into the right ventricle. Right ventricular contraction forces blood through the
pulmonary valve and into the pulmonary arteries. Blood circulates through the lungs, where it
acquires oxygen and releases carbon dioxide.
Oxygenated blood courses through the pulmonary veins to the left atrium. The left heart receives
small amounts of nonoxygenated blood via the thebesian veins, which drain the heart, and the
bronchial veins. Left atrial blood proceeds through the mitral valve into the left ventricle.
Left ventricular contraction propels blood through the aortic valve into the coronary circulation and
the thoracic aorta, which exits the chest through the diaphragmatic hiatus into the abdomen. A
ligamentous attachment (a remnant of the ductus arteriosus) exists between the descending
thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery just beyond the takeoff of the left subclavian artery.
The esophagus exits the neck to enter the posterior mediastinum. Through much of its course, it
lies posterior to the trachea. In the upper thorax, it lies slightly to the right with the aortic arch and
descending thoracic aorta to its left. Inferiorly, the esophagus turns leftward and enters the
abdomen through the esophageal diaphragmatic hiatus.
The thoracic duct arises primarily from the cisterna chyli in the abdomen. It traverses the
diaphragm and runs cephalad through the posterior mediastinum in proximity to the spinal
column. It enters the neck and veers to the left to empty into the left subclavian vein.
Workup
Initial emergency workup of a patient with multiple injuries should begin with the ABCs (airway,
breathing, and circulation), with appropriate intervention taken for each step.
Laboratory studies
A complete blood count (CBC) is a routine laboratory test for most trauma patients. The CBC
helps gauge blood loss, though the accuracy of findings to help determine acute blood loss is not
entirely reliable. Other important information provided includes platelet and white blood cell
counts, with or without differential.
Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis, though not as important in the initial assessment of trauma
victims, is important in their subsequent management. ABG determinations are an objective
measure of ventilation, oxygenation, and acid-base status, and their results help guide therapeutic
decisions such as the need for endotracheal intubation and subsequent extubation.
Patients who are seriously injured and require fluid resuscitation should have periodic monitoring
of their electrolyte status. This can help to avoid problems such as hyponatremia or
hypernatremia. The etiology of certain acid-base abnormalities can also be identified, eg, a
chloride-responsive metabolic alkalosis or hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis.
The coagulation profile, including prothrombin time (PT)/activated partial thromboplastin time
(aPTT), fibrinogen, fibrin degradation product, and D-dimer analyses, can be helpful in the
management of patients who receive massive transfusions (eg, >10 units of packed red blood
cells [RBCs]). Patients who manifest hemorrhage that cannot be explained by surgical causes
should also have their profile monitored.
Whereas elevated serum troponin I levels correlate with the presence of echocardiographic or
electrocardiographic abnormalities in patients with significant blunt cardiac injuries, these levels
have low sensitivity and predictive values in diagnosing myocardial contusion in those without.
Accordingly, troponin I level determination does not, by itself, help predict the occurrence of
complications that may require admission to the hospital. Accordingly, its routine use in this
clinical situation is not well supported.[2, 3]
Measurement of serum myocardial muscle creatine kinase isoenzyme (creatine kinase-MB) levels
is frequently performed in patients with possible blunt myocardial injuries. The test is rapid and
inexpensive. This diagnostic modality has been criticized because of poor sensitivity, specificity,
and positive predictive value in relation to clinically significant blunt myocardial injuries.
Lactate is an end product of anaerobic glycolysis and, as such, can be used as a measure of tissue
perfusion. Well-perfused tissues mainly use aerobic glycolytic pathways. Persistently elevated
lactate levels have been associated with poorer outcomes. Patients whose initial lactate levels are
high but are rapidly cleared to normal have been resuscitated well and have better outcomes.
Type and crossmatch are among the most important blood tests in the evaluation and
management of a seriously injured trauma patient, especially one who is predicted to require
major operative intervention.
Chest radiography
The chest x-ray (CXR) is the initial radiographic study of choice in patients with thoracic blunt
trauma. A chest radiograph is an important adjunct in the diagnosis of many conditions, including
chest wall fractures, pneumothorax, hemothorax, and injuries to the heart and great vessels (eg,
enlarged cardiac silhouette, widened mediastinum).
In contrast, certain cases arise in which physicians should not wait for a chest radiograph to
confirm clinical suspicion. The classic example is a patient presenting with decreased breath
sounds, hyperresonant hemithorax, and signs of hemodynamic compromise (ie, tension
pneumothorax). This scenario warrants immediate decompression before a chest radiograph is
obtained.[4]
A 2012 study by Paydar et al indicated that routine chest radiography in stable blunt trauma
patients may be of low clinical value. The authors propose that careful physical examination and
history taking can accurately identify those patients at low risk for chest injury, thus making
routine radiographs unnecessary.[5]
Computed tomography
Because of the lack of sensitivity of chest radiography in identifying significant injuries, computed
tomography (CT) of the chest is frequently performed in the trauma bay in the hemodynamically
stable patient. In one study, 50% of patients with normal chest radiographs were found to have
multiple injuries on chest CT. As a result, obtaining a chest CT scan in a supposedly stable patient
with significant mechanism of injury is becoming routine practice.
Helical CT and CT angiography (CTA) are being used more commonly in the diagnosis of patients
with possible blunt aortic injuries. Most authors advocate that positive findings or findings
suggestive of an aortic injury (eg, mediastinal hematoma) be augmented by aortography to more
precisely define the location and extent of the injury.[6, 7, 8]
Abdominal CT alone or combined with cervical spinal CT detected almost all occult small
pneumothoraces in one study of patients with blunt trauma, whereas cervical spinal CT alone
detected only one third of cases.[9]
Aortography
Aortography has been the criterion standard for diagnosing traumatic thoracic aortic injuries.
However, its limited availability and the logistics of moving a relatively critical patient to a remote
location make it less desirable. In addition, the introduction of spiral CT scanners, which have
100% sensitivity and greater than 99% specificity, has caused the role of aortography in the
evaluation of trauma patients to decline.
However, where spiral CT is equivocal, aortography can provide a more exact delineation of the
location and extent of aortic injuries. Aortography is much better at demonstrating injuries of the
ascending aorta. In addition, it is superior at imaging injuries of the thoracic great vessels.[10, 11]
Thoracic ultrasonography
Ultrasound examinations of the pericardium, heart, and thoracic cavities can be expeditiously
performed by surgeons and emergency department (ED) physicians within the ED. Pericardial
effusions or tamponade can be reliably recognized, as can hemothoraces associated with trauma.
The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of ultrasonography in these settings are all greater
than 90%.
Contrast esophagography
Contrast esophagograms are indicated for patients with possible esophageal injuries in whom
esophagoscopy results are negative. The esophagogram is first performed with water-soluble
contrast media. If this provides a negative result, a barium esophagogram is completed. If these
results are also negative, esophageal injury is reliably excluded.
Esophagoscopy and esophagography are each approximately 80-90% sensitive for esophageal
injuries. These studies are complementary and, when performed in sequence, identify nearly 100%
of esophageal injuries.
Electrocardiography
The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is a standard test performed on all thoracic trauma victims.
ECG findings can help identify new cardiac abnormalities and help discover underlying problems
that may impact treatment decisions. Furthermore, it is the most important discriminator to help
identify patients with clinically significant blunt cardiac injuries.
Patients with possible blunt cardiac injuries and normal ECG findings require no further treatment
or investigation for this injury. The most common ECG abnormalities found in patients with blunt
cardiac injuries are tachyarrhythmias and conduction disturbances, such as first-degree heart
block and bundle-branch blocks.
However, according to a 2012 practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for
the Surgery of Trauma, ECG alone should not be considered sufficient for ruling out blunt cardiac
injury. The guideline recommends obtaining an admission ECG and troponin I from all patients in
whom blunt cardiac injury is suspected and states that such injury can be ruled out only if both the
ECG and the troponin I level are normal.[12]
Echocardiography
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been extensively studied for use in the workup of
possible blunt rupture of the thoracic aorta. Its sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in the
diagnosis of this injury are each approximately 93-96%.
The advantages of TEE include the easy portability, no requisite contrast, minimal invasiveness,
and short time required to perform. TEE can also be used intraoperatively to help identify cardiac
abnormalities and monitor cardiac function.[13, 14, 15] The disadvantages include operator
expertise, long learning curve, and the fact that it is relatively weak at helping identify injuries of
the descending aorta.
Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can help identify pericardial effusions and tamponade,
valvular abnormalities, and disturbances in cardiac wall motion. TTEs are also performed in cases
of patients with possible blunt myocardial injuries and abnormal ECG findings.
Esophagoscopy
Esophagoscopy is the initial diagnostic procedure of choice in patients with possible esophageal
injuries. Either flexible or rigid esophagoscopy is appropriate, and the choice depends on the
experience of the clinician. Some authors prefer rigid esophagoscopy to evaluate the cervical
esophagus and flexible esophagoscopy for possible injuries of the thoracic and abdominal
esophagus. If esophagoscopy findings are negative, esophagography should be performed as
outlined above.
Bronchoscopy
Fiberoptic or rigid bronchoscopy is performed in patients with possible tracheobronchial injuries.
Both techniques are extremely sensitive for the diagnosis of these injuries. Fiberoptic
bronchoscopy offers the advantage of allowing an endotracheal tube to be loaded onto the scope
and the endotracheal intubation to be performed under direct visualization if necessary.
Indications
Operative intervention is rarely necessary in blunt thoracic injuries. In one report, only 8% of cases
with blunt thoracic injuries required an operation. Most such injuries can be treated with
supportive measures and simple interventional procedures such as tube thoracostomy.
The following section reviews indications for surgical intervention in blunt traumatic injuries
according to the previously presented classification system. Surgical indications are further
stratified into conditions necessitating an immediate operation and those in which surgery is
needed for delayed manifestations or complications of trauma.
Chest wall fractures, dislocations, and barotrauma (including diaphragmatic injuries)
Indications for immediate surgery include (1) traumatic disruption with loss of chest wall integrity
and (2) blunt diaphragmatic injuries.
Relatively immediate and long-term indications for surgery include (1) delayed recognition of blunt
diaphragmatic injury and (2) the development of a traumatic diaphragmatic hernia.
Blunt injuries of pleurae, lungs, and aerodigestive tracts
Indications for immediate surgery include (1) a massive air leak following chest tube insertion; (2)
a massive hemothorax or continued high rate of blood loss via the chest tube (ie, 1500 mL of
blood upon chest tube insertion or continued loss of 250 mL/hr for 3 consecutive hours); (3)
radiographically or endoscopically confirmed tracheal, major bronchial, or esophageal injury; and
(3) the recovery of gastrointestinal tract contents via the chest tube.
Relatively immediate and long-term indications for surgery include (1) a chronic clotted
hemothorax or fibrothorax, especially when associated with a trapped or nonexpanding lung; (2)
empyema; (3) traumatic lung abscess; (4) delayed recognition of tracheobronchial or esophageal
injury; (5) tracheoesophageal fistula; and (6) a persistent thoracic duct fistula/chylothorax.
Blunt injuries of heart, great arteries, veins, and lymphatics
Indications for immediate surgery include (1) cardiac tamponade, (2) radiographic confirmation of
a great vessel injury, and (3) an embolism into the pulmonary artery or heart.
Relatively immediate and long-term indications for surgery include the late recognition of a great
vessel injury (eg, development of traumatic pseudoaneurysm).
Contraindications
No distinct, absolute contraindications exist for surgery in blunt thoracic trauma. Rather,
guidelines have been instituted to define which patients have clear indications for surgery (eg,
massive hemothorax, continued high rates of blood loss via chest tube).
A controversial area has been the use of ED thoracotomy in patients with blunt trauma presenting
without vital signs. The results of this approach in this particular patient population have been
dismal and have led many authors to condemn it.
Rib fractures
Rib fractures are the most common blunt thoracic injuries. Ribs 4-10 are the ones most frequently
involved. Patients usually report inspiratory chest pain and discomfort over the fractured rib or
ribs. Physical findings include local tenderness and crepitus over the site of the fracture. If a
pneumothorax is present, breath sounds may be decreased and resonance to percussion may be
increased.
Rib fractures may also be a marker for other associated significant injury, both intrathoracic and
extrathoracic. In one report, 50% of patients with blunt cardiac injury have rib fractures. Fractures
of ribs 8-12 should raise the suggestion of associated abdominal injuries. Lee and colleagues
reported a 1.4- and 1.7-fold increase in the incidence of splenic and hepatic injury, respectively, in
those with rib fractures.
Elderly patients with three or more rib fractures have been shown to have a fivefold increase in
mortality and a fourfold increase in the incidence of pneumonia.
Effective pain control is the cornerstone of medical therapy for patients with rib fractures. For
most patients, this consists of oral or parenteral analgesic agents. Intercostal nerve blocks may be
feasible for those with severe pain who do not have numerous rib fractures. A local anesthetic
with a relatively long duration of action (eg, bupivacaine) can be used. Patients with multiple rib
fractures whose pain is difficult to control can be treated with epidural analgesia.
Adjunctive measures in the care of these patients include early mobilization and aggressive
pulmonary toilet. Rib fractures do not require surgery. Pain relief and the establishment of
adequate ventilation are the therapeutic goals for this injury. Rarely, a fractured rib lacerates an
intercostal artery or other vessel, resulting in the need for surgical control to achieve hemostasis
acutely. In the chronic phase, nonunion and persistent pain may also necessitate an operation.
Flail chest
A flail chest, by definition, involves three or more consecutive rib fractures in two or more places,
which produce a free-floating, unstable segment of chest wall. Separation of the bony ribs from
their cartilaginous attachments, termed costochondral separation, can also cause flail chest.
Patients report pain at the fracture sites, pain upon inspiration, and, frequently, dyspnea. Physical
examination reveals paradoxical motion of the flail segment. The chest wall moves inward with
inspiration and outward with expiration. Tenderness at the fracture sites is the rule. Dyspnea,
tachypnea, and tachycardia may be present. The patient may overtly exhibit labored respiration
due to the increased work of breathing induced by the paradoxical motion of the flail segment.
A significant amount of force is required to produce a flail segment. Therefore, associated injuries
are common and should be aggressively sought. The clinician should specifically be aware of the
high incidence of associated thoracic injuries such as pulmonary contusions and closed head
injuries, which, in combination, significantly increase the mortality associated with flail chest.
All of the treatments mentioned above for rib fractures are suitable for flail chest. Respiratory
distress or insufficiency can ensue in some patients with flail chest because of severe pain
secondary to the multiple rib fractures, the increased work of breathing, and the associated
pulmonary contusion. This may necessitate endotracheal intubation and positive-pressure
mechanical ventilation. Intravenous fluids are administered judiciously; fluid overloading can
precipitate respiratory failure, especially in those with significant pulmonary contusions.
To stabilize the chest wall and avoid endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, various
operations have been devised for correcting flail chest (eg, pericostal sutures, application of
external fixation devices, and placement of plates or pins for internal fixation). With improved
understanding of pulmonary mechanics and better mechanical ventilatory support, surgical
therapy has not proved superior to supportive and medical measures. Most authors, however,
would agree that stabilization is warranted if thoracotomy is indicated for another reason.
First and second rib fractures
First and second rib fractures are considered a separate entity from other rib fractures because of
the excessive energy transfer required to injure these sturdy and well-protected structures. First
and second rib fractures are harbingers of associated cranial, major vascular, thoracic, and
abdominal injuries. The clinician should aggressively seek to exclude the presence of these other
injuries.
Pain control and pulmonary toilet are the specific treatment measures for rib fractures. First and
second rib fractures do not require surgical therapy. An exception to this would be the need to
excise a greatly displaced bone fragment.
Clavicular fractures
Clavicular fractures are among the most common injuries to the shoulder girdle area. Common
mechanisms include a direct blow to the shaft of the bone, a fall on an outstretched hand, and a
direct lateral fall against the shoulder. Approximately 75-80% of clavicular fractures occur in the
middle third of the bone. Patients report tenderness over the fracture site and pain with movement
of the ipsilateral shoulder or arm.
Physical findings include anteroinferior positioning of the ipsilateral arm as compared with the
contralateral arm. The proximal segment of the clavicle is displaced superiorly because of the
action of the sternocleidomastoid.
Nearly all clavicular fractures can be managed without surgery. Primary treatment consists of
immobilization with a figure-eight dressing, clavicle strap, or similar dressing or sling. Oral
analgesics can be used to control pain. Surgery is rarely indicated. Surgical intervention is
occasionally indicated for the reduction of a badly displaced fracture.
Sternoclavicular joint dislocations
Strong lateral compressive forces against the shoulder can cause sternoclavicular joint
dislocation. Anterior dislocation is more common than posterior dislocation. Patients report pain
with arm motion or when a compressive force is applied against the affected shoulder. The
ipsilateral arm and shoulder may be anteroinferiorly displaced. With anterior dislocations, the
medial end of the clavicle can become more prominent. With posterior dislocations, a depression
may be discernible adjacent to the sternum. Associated injuries to the trachea, subclavian vessels,
or brachial plexus can occur with posterior dislocations.
Closed or open reduction is generally advised. Treatment strategies depend on whether the
patient has an anterior or posterior dislocation.
For anterior dislocations, local anesthesia and sedative medications are administered, and lateral
traction is applied to the affected arm that is placed in abduction and extension. This maneuver,
combined with direct pressure over the medial clavicle, can occasionally reduce an anterior
dislocation. For posterior dislocations, a penetrating towel clip can be used to grasp the medial
clavicle to provide the necessary purchase for anterior manual traction to reduce the joint. Proper
levels of pain control, up to and including general anesthesia, are provided. If closed reduction
fails, open reduction is performed.
Sternal fractures
Most sternal fractures are caused by MVAs. The upper and middle thirds of the bone are most
commonly affected in a transverse fashion. Patients report pain around the injured area.
Inspiratory pain or a sense of dyspnea may be present. Physical examination reveals local
tenderness and swelling. Ecchymosis is noted in the area around the fracture. A palpable defect or
fracture-related crepitus may be present.
Associated injuries occur in 55-70% of patients with sternal fractures. The most common
associated injuries are rib fractures, long bone fractures, and closed head injuries. The association
of blunt cardiac injuries with sternal fractures has been a source of great debate. Blunt cardiac
injuries are diagnosed in fewer than 20% of patients with sternal fractures. Caution should be
exercised before myocardial injury is completely excluded. The workup should begin with
electrocardiography (ECG).
Most sternal fractures require no therapy specifically directed at correcting the injury. Patients are
treated with analgesics and are advised to minimize activities that involve the use of pectoral and
shoulder girdle muscles. The most important aspect of the care for these patients is to exclude
blunt myocardial and other associated injuries.
Patients who are experiencing severe pain related to the fracture and those with a badly displaced
fracture are candidates for open reduction and internal fixation. Various techniques have been
described, including wire suturing and the placement of plates and screws. The latter technique is
associated with better outcomes.
Scapular fractures
Scapular fractures are uncommon. Their main clinical importance is the high-energy forces
required to produce them and the attendant high incidence of associated injuries. The rate of
associated injuries is 75-100%, most commonly involving the head, chest, or abdomen.
Patients with scapular fractures report pain around the scapula. Tenderness, swelling,
ecchymosis, and fracture-related crepitus can all be present. The fracture is most frequently
located in the body or neck of the scapula. More than 30% of scapular fractures are missed during
the initial patient evaluation. The discovery of a scapular fracture should prompt a concerted effort
to exclude major vascular injuries and injuries of the thorax, abdomen, and neurovascular bundle
of the ipsilateral arm.
Shoulder immobilization is the standard initial treatment. This can be accomplished by placing the
arm in a sling or shoulder harness. Range-of-motion exercises are started as soon as possible to
help prevent loss of shoulder mobility. Surgery is infrequently indicated. Involvement of the
glenoid, acromion, or coracoid may require open reduction and internal fixation with the goal of
maintaining proper shoulder mobility.
Scapulothoracic dissociation
Sometimes called flail shoulder, this rare injury occurs when very strong traction forces pull the
scapula and other elements of the shoulder girdle away from the thorax. The muscular, vascular,
and nervous components of the shoulder and arm are severely compromised. Physical findings
include significant hematoma formation and edema in the shoulder area. Neurologic deficits
include loss of sensation and motor function distal to the shoulder. Pulses in the arm are typically
decreased or lost due to axillary artery thrombosis.
No specific medical therapy has been developed for this devastating injury. Surgery is rarely
indicated early in the course of this injury. If the affected limb retains sufficient neurovascular
integrity and function, operative fixation may be indicated to restore shoulder stability. Many
scapulothoracic dissociations result in a flail limb that is insensate or is associated with severe
pain due to proximal brachial plexus injury. An above-the-elbow amputation may be the best
approach for these patients.
Chest wall defects
The management of large, open chest wall defects initially requires irrigation and debridement of
devitalized tissue to avoid progression into a necrotizing wound infection. Once the infection is
under control, subsequent treatment depends on the severity and level of defect. Reconstructive
options range from skin grafting to well vascularized flaps to a variety of meshes with or without
methylmethacrylate. The choice of reconstruction depends upon the depth of the defect.
Traumatic asphyxia
The curious clinical constellation known as traumatic asphyxia is the result of thoracic injury due
to a strong crushing mechanism, such as might occur when an individual is pinned under a very
heavy object. Some effects of the injury are compounded if the glottis is closed during application
of the crushing force.
Patients present with cyanosis of the head and neck, subconjunctival hemorrhage, periorbital
ecchymosis, and petechiae of the head and neck. The face frequently appears very edematous or
moonlike. Epistaxis and hemotympanum may be present. A history of loss of consciousness,
seizures, or blindness may be elicited. Neurologic sequelae are usually transient. Recognition of
this syndrome should prompt a search for associated thoracic and abdominal injuries.
The head of the patient's bed should be elevated to approximately 30 to decrease transmission of
pressure to the head. Adequate airway and ventilatory status must be assured, and the patient is
given supplemental oxygen. Serial neurologic examinations are performed while the patient is
monitored in an intensive care setting. No specific surgical therapy is indicated for traumatic
asphyxia. Associated injuries to the torso and head frequently require surgical intervention.
Blunt diaphragmatic injuries
Diaphragmatic injuries are relatively uncommon. Blunt mechanisms, usually a result of high-speed
MVAs, cause approximately 33% of diaphragmatic injuries. Most diaphragmatic injuries
recognized clinically involve the left side, though autopsy and computed tomography (CT)-based
investigations suggest a roughly equal incidence for both sides.
This injury should be considered in patients who sustain a blow to the abdomen and present with
dyspnea or respiratory distress. Because of the very high incidence of associated injuries, eg,
major splenic or hepatic trauma, it is not unusual for these patients to present with hypovolemic
shock.
Most diaphragmatic injuries are diagnosed incidentally at the time of laparotomy or thoracotomy
for associated intra-abdominal or intrathoracic injuries. Initial chest radiographs are normal.
Findings suggestive of diaphragmatic disruption on chest radiographs may include abnormal
location of the nasogastric tube in the chest, ipsilateral hemidiaphragm elevation, or abdominal
visceral herniation into the chest.
In a patient with multiple injuries, CT is not very accurate, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
is not very realistic. Bedside emergency ultrasonography is gaining popularity, and case reports in
the literature have supported its use in the evaluation of diaphragm. Diagnostic laparoscopy and
thoracoscopy have also been reported to be successful in the identification of diaphragmatic
injury.
A confirmed diagnosis or the suggestion of blunt diaphragmatic injury is an indication for surgery.
Blunt diaphragmatic injuries typically produce large tears measuring 5-10 cm or longer. Most
injuries are best approached via laparotomy. An abdominal approach facilitates exposure of the
injury and allows exploration for associated abdominal organ injuries. The exception to this rule is
a posterolateral injury of the right hemidiaphragm. This injury is best approached through the
chest because the liver obscures the abdominal approach.
Most injuries can be repaired primarily with a continuous or interrupted braided suture (1-0 or
larger). Centrally located injuries are most easily repaired. Lateral injuries near the chest wall may
require reattachment of the diaphragm to the chest wall by encirclement of the ribs with suture
during the repair. Synthetic mesh made of polypropylene or Dacron is occasionally needed to
repair large defects.[16, 17]
Complications
Patients with blunt thoracic trauma are subject to myriad complications during the course of their
care.
Wound complications include the following:
Wound infection
Wound dehiscence (particularly problematic in sternal wounds)
Myocardial infarction
Arrhythmias
Pericarditis
Ventricular aneurysm formation
Septal defects
Valvular insufficiency
Atelectasis
Pneumonia
Pulmonary abscess
Empyema
Pneumatocele, lung cyst
Clotted hemothorax
Fibrothorax
Bronchial repair disruption
Bronchopleural fistula
Graft infection
Pseudoaneurysm
Graft thrombosis
Deep venous thrombosis
Pulmonary embolism
Leakage of repair
Mediastinitis
Esophageal fistula
Esophageal stricture, late (click here to complete a Medscape CME activity on treating
esophageal strictures)
Skeletal deformity
Chronic pain
Impaired pulmonary mechanics
For the great majority of patients with blunt chest trauma, outcome and prognosis are excellent.
Most (>80%) require either no invasive therapy or, at most, a tube thoracostomy to effect
resolution of their injuries. The most important determinant of outcome is the presence or
absence of significant associated injuries of the central nervous system, abdomen, and pelvis.
Some injuries, such as cardiac chamber rupture, thoracic aortic rupture, injuries of the
intrathoracic inferior and superior vena cava, and delayed recognition of esophageal rupture, are
associated with high morbidity and mortality.
Future directions for improving the diagnosis and management of blunt thoracic trauma involve
diagnostic testing, endovascular techniques, and patient selection.
The use of thoracoscopy for the diagnosis and management of thoracic injuries will increase.
Also, the use of ultrasonography for the diagnosis of conditions such as hemothorax and cardiac
tamponade will become more widespread. Finally, spiral CT scanning techniques will be used
more frequently for definitive diagnosis of major vascular lesions (eg, injuries to the thoracic aorta
and its branches).
Endovascular techniques for the repair of great vessel injuries will be developed further and
applied more frequently. Also, patient selection and nonsurgical therapies for delayed operative
management of thoracic aortic rupture will be refined.
more
About
About Medscape
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Advertising Policy
Help Center
Membership
Email Newsletters
Manage My Account
Apps
Medscape
MedPulse News
CME & Education
WebMD Network
WebMD
MedicineNet
eMedicineHealth
RxList
WebMD Corporate
Editions
English
Deutsch
Espaol
Franais
Portugus
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright 1994-2016 by WebMD LLC. This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
This website uses cookies to deliver its services as described in our Cookie Policy. By using this website, you agree to the use of
cookies.
close