Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6
American Journal of Therapeutics 4, 85-60 (1997) ACUTE RENAL PAPILLARY NECROSIS INDUCED BY IBUPROFEN Mohamed G. Atta’ and Andrew Whelton** Several specific renal syndromes may be induced by the interaction of nonsteroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) upon renal function. We report an NSAID-induced form of acute renal failure that represents a dual mechanism of impact on renal function involving direct paren- cchymal damage at a renal papillary level and mechanical outflow ureteric obstruction consequent to acute papillary necrosis. This form of NSAID-related acute renal failure has been reported very infrequently, We suspect the syndrome is not often recognized clinically. Clinicians and health care ‘workers need to remind constantly the general public concerning the standard steps to be taken to censure the proper and safe use of over-the-counter drugs. This is especially important considering the recent FDA approval of the over-the-counter sale of naproxen sodium, ketoprofen, and ibuprofen. Keywords: acute renal failure, acute papillary necrosis, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, kidney failure, analgesics INTRODUCTION The impact of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on renal function has recently been the sub- ject of numerous reports and reviews [1-4]. Addition- ally, the US. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved over-the-counter (OTC) marketing of naproxen sodium (1994), followed shortly thereafter (October, 1995) by approval for OTC use of ketopro- fen. These decisions have added the availability of two more potent and effective NSAIDs other than ibupro- fen, which was approved for similar use one decade ‘earlier. Specific renal syndromes have been identified for NSAID-renal interactions and relevant risk factors for these interactions have been identified (Table 1). CASE REPORT A 42-year-old African-American female was admitted to the Johns Hopkins Hospital with a painful left * Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins Univesity School of ‘Medicine, Baltimore, MD; * Finch University of Heath Sciences The Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, IL, USA. * To whom all correspondence should be addressed, at Finch Uni- versity of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medica! Schol, 3333, Green Bay Road, North Chicago, IL 60064-3095, USA. 1075-2765 © 1997 Chapman & Hall breast abscess and the development of bilateral flank pain 3 days prior to admission. The patient reported a 13-year history of depression and at the time of evalu- ation, she was taking sertraline hydrochloride (Zoloft; Roerig, New York, NY) for this condition. Her medical records indicated that seven years earlier she had de- veloped transient hepatitis, apparently secondary to the use of fluphenazine hydrochloride (Prolixin; Apothecon, Princeton, NJ). Otherwise, she had been in ‘good health, Two weeks prior to admission, the patient noted the development of redness, swelling, and superficial ul- ceration of the medial aspect of her left breast. As this became progressively more painful, she began to self- medicate with OTC ibuprofen. Since this did not ini- tially relieve the pain, she reported that she ingested an average of 24 tablets for 3 consecutive days (each tablet containing 200 mg ibuprofen). She then devel- oped severe bilateral flank pain, colicky in nature and radiating to the groin. She also noted the passage of blood-stained “‘mucous-like” material on one occa- sion. She did not note the development of gross he- ‘maturia. She denied the use of any other medications, including intravenous recreational drug use. She pre- sented to the Emergency Department of the Johns Hopkins Hospital with combined breast and flank pain. During physical examination she was not in obvi- ous distress and was oriented to time and place. Vital 56 MG ATTA and A WHELTON Teble 1. Renal effects associated with NSAIDs and related analgesics. Pathogenesis ‘Acetaminophen Risk factors Renal effect NSAID Fluid and electrolyte disturbances Sodium and water _4 Prostaglandins retention Hyperkalemia J Prostaglandins Acute renal failure 1 Prostaglandins Nephrotic syndrome with Acts as allergen -> lympho- acute interstitial cyte-iymphokine activation nephritis ‘Acute papillary necrosis/ Hypotension plus £ renal per: analgesic nephropathy fusion; 4 prostaglandins NA NSAID use; renal, cardiac, hepatic impairment NIA Renal, cardiac impairment, ‘multiple myeloma, DM, K supplements, K-sparing diuretic, ACE inti CHF, renal or hepatic impai ‘ment, ascites, vascular Unknown; in overdose situ tions, ? secondary to acute hepatic failuresinduced disease, volume contrac- hypotension 3, SLE, shock, sepsis, advanced age, hyper- reninemia, hyperaldost NA 2; female gender, advanced age, use of fenoprofen Long-term abuse with 7 dose Long-term, mixed analgesic and concurrent use of abuse (acetaminophen, salicylates and caffeine salicylates, and catfeine) nt-nflammatory drug; SLE—syst signs on admission were: blood pressure, 91/55 mm Hg; pulse, 109/min; respiratory rate, 20/min; tem- perature, 99°F; weight, 110 kg. She had a 10cm area of shiny yellow ulceration on the medial aspect of her left breast. There was no skin rash or lymphadenopathy. Her abdominal examination was benign without cos- tovertebral angle tenderness. The remainder of the physical exam was unremarkable. Admission serum electrolytes, chemistries, and he- matology tests revealed: 136 mEq/L Na, 3.1 mEq/LK, 85 mEq/L Cl, 20 mEq/L HCO, 42 mg/dL blood urea nitrogen (BUN), 3.3 mg/dL creatinine, 88 mg/dL glu- cose, 20,200 WBC, 34.2% hematocrit, and 364,000/ mm’ platelets, At the time of admission, urine dem- onstrated the presence of 1+ positivity for both heme and protein on dipstick evaluation. Microscopic uri- alysis demonstrated the presence of 5-10 erythro- cytes/high power field and 10 leukocytes /high power field. ‘The morning after admission, the renal service was consulted and a repeat urine examination demon- strated no protein but we did observe a trace heme reaction on dipstick testing and rare tubular epithelial cells on microscopic examination. A sonographic im- age of the abdomen revealed normal size kidneys with no signs of acute obstruction. Her prior records re- American Journal of Therapeutics (1997) 4(1) ;Agiotensin-converting enzyme; CHF-congestive heart fallure; dlc—discontinue; OM— diabetes mein ic lupus erythematosus; 1 indicates increase; L vealed that her serum creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL sev- ‘eral months earlier. Acute renal papillary necrosis (RPN) was suspected. at the time of renal consultation. Initiation of vigorous diuresis was undertaken by fluid hydration. This re- sulted in an excellent response. Her serum creatinine and BUN were reduced to 1.2 mg/dL and 12 mg/dL, respectively, within 48 hours. During the time of vig- orous diuresis, no further mucous or tissue-like mate- rial was detected in her urine, She maintained her nor- mal renal function upon discharge. RESULTS Clinical presentation of renal papillary necrosis Renal papillary necrosis develops in a wide variety of conditions (Table 2). Although the clinical course of RPNis variable, it typically presents clinically in either an acute or chronic fashion. Chronic RPN usually pur- sues a protracted and often asymptomatic course over months or years. It can be found unexpectedly on ex- cretory urography or a5 an incidental lesion at post- mortem in an otherwise asymptomatic patient, where- in a diagnosis of RPN was not clinically entertained. Acute RPN, by contrast, usually presents with flank ACUTE RENAL PAPILLARY NECROSIS INDUCED BY IBUPROFEN 87 Table 2. Clinical conditions associated with the development of acute or chronic renal papillary necrosis. Frequency of Condition ‘association Diabetes mellitus 50% to 60% Urinary tract obstruction 10% to 40% Analgesic abuse 18% to 20% Sickle hemoglobinopathy 10% to 15% Renal allograft rejection 5% Pyelonephritis 5% Less commonly: Rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis ‘Amyloidosis Cryoglobulinemia Renal fungal infection Retrograde radiocontrast injection Acute pancreatitis pain, colic, and urinary findings of gross or micro- scopic hematuria. The passage of sloughed papillae may be associated with severe lumbar pain that, due to other causes, is difficult to distinguish clinically from ureteral colic. Portions of necrotic papillae can be recovered by straining the urine through a gauze filter [5,6] The voiding of papillary tissue may be occasion- ally associated with hematuria that can be massive and difficult to control. Acute RPN usually, but not invariably, involves both kidneys [78]. Despite bilat- eral RPN, evidence of significant renal impairment is not always present [9]. This is related to the fact that damage may be limited to a small number of the pa- pillae since a total of eight papillae are present in a healthy human kidney. Additionally, despite the dam- age to the papillary tips, the collecting ducts now dis- charge their urine into the flattened viable portion of the renal pyramid with the urine continuing through the renal outflow tract. The dominant functional ab- normality then becomes the inability to produce maxi- mally concentrated urine. Excretory urography remains the most useful ex- amination in the diagnosis of RPN [10,11]. Unfortu- nately, radiologic diagnosis cannot be made until changes in the papillary region have progressed to a point where the papillae have become shrunken or a necrosed papilla appears as a translucent body within radiocontrast filling the minor calyces. The latter ra- diographic finding is designated as the ring finding of renal papillary necrosis because the contrast within the minor calyces assumes a ring-like appearance as it surrounds the sloughed papilla. On occasion, radio- graphic findings can be negative [12,13] despite recov- ery of sloughed papillary tissue in the urine. In view of the transient nature of the obstruction induced in the ureter by the passage of a sloughed papilla (Fig. 1), renal ultrasound study will not detect such a transient episode of mechanical obstruction and renal failure Such was the case in our patient. Histology and pathophysiology ‘The basic pathophysiologic process in RPN appears to be ischemic necrosis [14-17]. The sharp demarcation of the renal papillary lesion and the tissue histology disclosing coagulative necrosis closely resemble the changes of infarction. The fact that necrosis is limited to the distal segment of involved renal pyramids can be attributed to the physiologic role of maximal uri- nary concentrating ability displayed by this portion of the kidney. The production of maximally-concen- trated urine requires the unique vascular and ana- tomical characteristics that are found in the renal pa- pillae. A brief review of these features follows since it will help explain the pathophysiologic circumstances that contributed to the genesis of acute papillary ne- crosis in our patient. The kidney is divided into a pale outer region, the cortex, and a darker inner region, the medulla (Fig. 1). ‘The human cortex develops as a multilobar entity. As result, the medulla is divided into 8 to 18 (average, 8) striated conical masses called the renal pyramids. The base of each pyramid is positioned on the corticomed- ullary boundary with the apex extending toward the Fig. 1. Diagram of two renal pyra kidney. One pyramidal tip or renal papilla has become necrotic and sloughed off the pyramid, impacted within the ureter, and caused acute outflow obstruction. American Journal of Therapeutics (1997) 41) 58 renal pelvis to form a papilla. On the tip of each pa- pilla are 10 to 25 small openings that represent the distal ends of the collecting ducts. The individual functioning units of the kidney, the nephrons, number approximately one million per kidney and link into these collecting ducts so that the final processing of urine concentration can take place before the urine is eliminated via the tips of the papillae. The renal pelvis represents the extended portion of the upper urinary tract. In humans, two and sometimes three outpouch- ings called the major calyces extend outward from the ‘upper dilated end of the renal pelvis. From each of the major calyces, several minor calyces extend toward the papillae of the pyramids and drain the urine formed by each pyramidal unit. The blood supply to the renal papillae is derived from two sources: the vasa recta, which arises from the capillary network surrounding the proximal and di tal segments of the nephron, and branches of the tor- tuous arteries in the adventia of the minor calyces. The vasa recta lie side-by-side and form vascular bundles that are separated from each other by the intervening tubules and the capillary plexus formed between the descending and ascending limbs of the vasa recta. At the base of the pyramid, or the outer medulla, the vascular bundles are widest; they gradually decrease in size and only discrete individual vessels remain toward the tip of the papilla. The net effect is dimin- ished blood supply to the papillary tip compared to the rest of the kidney and pyramid. However, this is essential for the physiologic operation of the counter- current multiplier systems that permits the production of maximally-concentrated or dilute urine [18-21] This vascular supply is highly responsive to and de- pendent on local prostaglandin production for its role in the counter-current multiplier system [18-21] Determination of the incidence of NSAID-induced acute papillary necrosis, ‘The exact clinical frequency with which acute papil- lary necrosis develops during NSAID therapy is un- known. It appears likely that minor episodes of RPN are frequently overlooked by both patients and phy- sicians and that only the symptomatic episodes asso- ciated with acute flank pain and gross hematuria re- ceive clinical attention. Because of the infrequent clini- cal presentation of the syndrome, itis not possible to assess its rate of occurrence based on prospective clini- cal trials. Hence, itis only from the literature and from the database of spontaneous adverse drug reaction re- ports, as collected by the FDA, that one can attempt to define the clinical incidence of this problem. The spontaneous reporting system (SRS) of the Di- vision of Epidemiology and Surveillance (DES) of the American Journal of Therapeutics (1997) 4(1) MG ATTA and A WHELTON FDA is a computerized database of adverse reactions reported by health professionals. The present database contains over 500,000 reports collected since 1969. The system contains only adverse reactions detected and reported after marketing the drug. The primary pur- pose for maintaining the database is for it to serve as an early warning system for adverse drug reactions not detected during premarket testing. The SRS de- pends on a health professional to detect a new clinical event, attribute the appearance of the clinical event to the administration of a drug, and report the clinical event to a drug company or the FDA. The health pro- fessional may choose to report the adverse reaction to a drug firm who must, by law, report this to the FDA. Ninety percent of DES reports are received from drug, manufacturers and the remaining 10% are reported directly from other sources (e.g., health professionals and consumers). Data from all reports are entered into the DES adverse drug reaction database and the report images are scanned into an electronic filing system. ‘At our request, the DES retrieved the adverse NSAID drug reports for the past decade (1985-1995), as these would likely yield clinical reports of acute papillary necrosis. Table 3 lists the clinical diagnostic ‘or symptomatic terms under which cases of renal side effects of NSAID were reported to the FDA. Review of this renal finding listing emphasizes the importance of accurate and specific adverse drug reporting to the FDA since these 18 diagnostic/symptomatic terms Table 3. Ibuprofen-associated “renal” adverse reactions spontaneously reported from within the USA to the FDA 1985-1995. Renal term (finding) Total reports ‘Acute kidney failure 41 Kidney failure 24 Kidney function abnormalities 20 Nephritis 16 Hematuria 10 Nephrosis Uremia Glomerulitis Urinary frequency Otiguria Urine casts Urine abnormalities Anuri Urinary retention Urinary tract disease Nocturia Pain kidney Kidney calculus Total B lassen ssenouee ACUTE RENAL PAPILLARY NECROSIS INDUCED BY IBUPROFEN 59 (Table 3) do not contain a specific reported term for acute RPN. As a result, we can only describe the inci- dence of NSAID-induced acute RPN as infrequent DISCUSSION The causative role of ibuprofen in the production of acute papillary necrosis in our patient appears to be beyond question. As demonstrated in Fig. 1, one or more sloughed papillae caused transient bilateral ure- teric obstruction and this resulted in the symptomatic flank pain as reported by our patient. Rapid improve- ‘ment occurred as a consequence of forced fluid diure- sis, which dislodged the obstructive sloughed papil- lae, together with discontinuation of ibuprofen therapy. In our patient, itis likely that her short term (3 days) ingestion of massive amounts (-5 g/d) of ibuprofen led to a circumstance where prostaglandin-dependent blood flow to her renal papillae was drastically re- duced or eliminated as a result of the of prostaglandin production inhi therapy dehydration. These combined factors would likely have produced exceedingly high local ibuprofen concentrations within the tips of the renal papillae and this may have provided a direct local tissue toxicity in addition to the factors that would have set the stage for drastic reduction in blood flow to the papillary tips. These pathophysiologic and drug pharmacoki- netic factors then produced acute renal papillary ne- crosis. A comprehensive literature search and in-house data review yielded citations concerning ibuprofen- associated renal papillary necrosis [22-25]. Essentially, all commonly used NSAID have the ability to produce RPN, characteristically at high dosing levels, as found in animal toxicity studies. Information contained within the Upjohn Worldwide Spontaneous database was reviewed for us for reports of acute papillary ne- tosis for all strengths of ibuprofen. There were 12 reports described as necrotizing papillitis, renal necro- sis, or papillary necrosis. Such events have not been reported with the 200 mg strength ibuprofen products. Total daily dosage ranges from 400 mg/d to 2400 mg/d in 11 of the 12 reports; in eight of the 12, the dose ranged from 1200 mg/d to 1800 mg/d. Several were consumer reports that were not medically con- firmed. Information concerning significant medical history or confounding factors was not available in ‘most cases. One patient had a history of mild hyper- tension. Partial or full recovery was reported in seven of the 12 cases. Information from the Upjohn World- wide Spontaneous database cannot be used to calcu- late the incidence or estimates of drug risks. As with all spontaneous reporting systems, there is not neces- sarily a causal relationship between the use of a drug and the occurrence of an event. ‘Our patient experience illustrates the importance of continuing the educational efforts directed at the gen- eral public that are undertaken by medical, regulatory, and community groups to insure the proper and safe use of OTC drugs. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We thank the Upjohn Company for performing the literature search for this study, REFERENCES. 1, Abraham PA, Keane WF: Glomerular and interstitial disease induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Nephrol 1984-41 2. Clive DM, Stoff JS: Renal syndromes associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. N Engl J Med 1984;310:563 3. Whelton A, Hamilton CW: Nonsteroidal ant-inflamma- tory drugs: Effects on kidney function. J Clin Pharmacol 1991;31:585-598, 4. Whelton A, Stout RL, Spilman PS, Klassen DK: Renal cffects of ibuprofen, piroxicam, and sulindac in patients with asymptomatic renal failure: A prospective, ran- domized, crossover comparison. Ann Intern Med 1990; 112568. 5. Bergnes MA: Recovery of papillae in renal papillary ne- crosis. Report of two cases. Arch Pathol 1963;75:501 6, Lindholm T: On renal papillary necrosis with special reference to the diagnostic importance of papillary frag- ‘ments in the urine, therapy and prognosis. Acta Med Scand 1960;167:319, 7. Lauler DP, Schreiner GE, David A: Renal medullary ne- crosis, Am J Med 1960;29-132. 8, Sargent JC, Sargent JW: Unilateral renal papillary necro- sis. J Urol 1955:73:757, 9. Eknoyan G, Quinibi WY, Grissom RT: Renal papillary necrosis: An update. Medicine 1982;61:55, 10. Lindvall N: Renal papillary necrosis. A roentgeno- ‘graphic study of 155 cases. Acta Radiol (Stockholm) 1960;192{suppl 1): 11. Lindvall N: Radiological changes of renal papillary ne- crosis. Kidney Int 1978;13:93 12, Failey KF, Kincaid-Smith P: Renal papillary necrosis with a normal pyelogram. Br Med J 19681156. 13. Lalli AF: Renal papillary necrosis. Am J Roentgenol Rad Ther Nucl Med 1972:114741. 14. Arruda JAL, Sabatani S, Mehta PK, Sodhi B, Baranowski R: Functional characterization of drug-induced experi: mental papillary necrosis. Kidney Int 1979;15:264. American Journal of Therapeutics (1997) 41) 60 15, 16, v7, 18. 18. Kincaid-Smith P, Saker BM, Mckenzie IFC: Lesions in the vasa recta in experimental analgesic nephropathy. Lancet 1968;1:24 Nanra RS, Chirawong P, Kincaid-Smith P: Medullary ischemia in experimental analgesic nephropathy. Aust NZ J Med 1973:3:580, Wylie RG, Hill GS, Murray G, Ramsden PW, Heptinstall RH: Experimental papillary necrosis of the kidney IIL Effects of reserpine and other pharmacological agents on. the lesion. Am J Pathol 1972;68:236. Beeuwkes R IIL, Bonventre JV: Tubular organization and vascular-tubular relations in the dog kidney. Am J Phys- Jol 1975,229:695, Martinez-Maldonado M, Stitzer O: Urine concentration and dilution in the rat: Contributions of papillary struc- tures during high rates of urine flow. Kidney Int 1978; 13194, American Journal of Therapeutics (1997) 4(1) 21. 2, 2, 24 25, (MG ATTA and A WHELTON Patrono C, Dunn MJ: The clinical significance of inhibi- tion of renal prostaglandin synthesis. Kidney Int 1987; 32a ‘Stokes JB: Effect of prostaglandin E, on chloride trans- port across the rabbit thick ascending limb of Henle: Selective inhibition of the medullary portion. J Clin In- ‘vest 197964689. Heaton JM, Bourke E: Papillary necrosis associated with

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi