Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
OF PETROLEUM
This Code is based on accepted good practice and the appropriate standards
for use in the industry. It should be regarded as complementary to the
statutory requirements pertaining to the petroleum industry in different countries.
It is hoped that the adoption of this Code will help reduce the risk of accidents.
Published by
THE INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM,LONDON
A charitable company limited by guarantee
INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM
February
1987
Published on behalf of
THE INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM, LONDON
John Wiley & Sons
Chichester - New York - Brisbane - Toronto . Singapore
Copyright @ 1987 by The Institute of Petroleum, London
Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
2 Pressure Storage at Refineries. Bulk Distribution Plants and Large Industrial Consumer Premises
2.1 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1.1 Inclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1.2 Exclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1.3 Object . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Requirements for the Layout Location and Spacing of LPG Pressure Storage Installations . . .4
2.2.1 General layout principles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
2.2.2 Location and spacing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
2.2.3 Bunds and separation kerbs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
2.2.4 Ground conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
2.2.5 Pits and depressions in the storage area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.
2.2.6 Other hazardous storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
2.2.7 Lay0u.t of storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
2.2.8 Protection of facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .6
2.3 Pressure Storage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3.1 Design code . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3.2 Design criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3.3 Fittings . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
2.3.4 Connections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.3.5 Level gauging equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.3.6 Pressure relief . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.3.7 Shut-off valves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3.8 Emergency shut-off valves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3.9 Excess flow valves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3.10 Drainsystems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3.11 Filling capacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.3.12 Insulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
V
CONTENTS
vi
CONTENTS
2.9.8 Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.9.9 Removal of combustible materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.9.10 Warning signs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.10 Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.10.1 Housekeeping . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . 15
2.10.2 Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.10.3 Emergency proceduredplans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.10.4 Emergency action . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.10.5 Purging and filling of systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.10.6 Draining water in service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.10.7 Transfer operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
2.10.8 Access to storage and operating areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.10.9 Lighting of storage and operating areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.3 RequirementsforLocationandSpacingofRefrigeratedLPGTanks . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.3.1 Limits for thermal radiation flux levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.3.2 Rate of leakage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.3.3 Vapourtravel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
vii
CONTENTS
3.10 Requirements for the Initial Filling of Storage Tank or Re-commissioningAfter Inspection . . 28
3.10.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.10.2 Icelhydrate formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.10.3 Permit to work systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.10.4 Removal of air-drying out . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.10.5 Displacement of inerts by LPG vapour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.10.6 Cooling down and commissioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
Appendices
1 Thermal Radiation Flux Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2 Calculation of Thermal Radiation Flux Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3 LeakSourcesandTypicalLeakRatesfromLPGStorageSystems . . . . . . . . . . 65
4 Vapour Dispersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
5 Cooling Water Requirements for the Protection of Refrigerated LPG Storage Tank
Systems Exposed to Thermal Radiation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
...
Vlll
CONTENTS
6 Safe End Limits When Purging with Nitrogen vol . per cent . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
7 GlossaryofTerms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
8 Guidance on Work Permit Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
9 Some Codes of Practice. Specifications. Standards. etc., Relevant to the LPG Industry . . . 84
10 List of Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
ix
FOREWORD
The Liquefied Petroleum Gas Industry Technical the risk of accident, The Institute of Petroleum,
Association (UK). The Institution of Gas Engineers and The
5. For the purpose of this Code certain interpret- Liquefied Petroleum Gas Industry Technical
ations which are given in Appendix 7 apply irres- Association (UK) cannot accept any responsi-
pective of any other meaning the words may have bility, of whatever kind, for damage or alleged
in other connections. Where used in the Code damage arising or otherwiseoccumng in or about
such defined terms are printed in italics. premises, areas or vehicles to which this Code has
6. Although it is .believed that adoption of the been applied.
recommendations of the Code will help to reduce
xi
1
PROPERTIES OF LIQUEFIED
PETROLEUM GAS
1.1.2 1.2.2
LPG at ambient temperature and normal atmos- Commercial propane is a hydrocarbon mixture con-
pheric pressure is usually a gas but is readily liquefied sisting predominantly of propane andor propylene,
by either additional pressure, or refrigeration, or a i.e. C3s.
combination of both.
It is stored and handled: 1.2.3
(a) as a liquid under pressure at ambient tempera- Physical properties of these two commercial grades
are given in Table 1.
tures,
(b) as a fully refrigerated liquid kept at sufficiently
low temperature to produce a pressure substan-
tially atmospheric,
(c) as a semi-refrigerated liquid kept at a higher
1.3 HAZARDS
temperature than (b) to produce an intermediate
1.3.1
pressure.
LPG is usually stored and transported as a liquid.
1.1.3
Leakage of liquid results in the formation of large
volumes of vapour as 1 volume of liquid produces
LPG is supplied against product specifications, e.g.
BS 4250, Gas Processors Association of the USA approximately 250 volumes of vapour at atmospheric
pressure.
(GPA).
1.3.2
1.1.4
Even small quantities of LPG vapour in air may form
The two grades of LPG most commonly handled are
referred to as commercial butane and commercial a flammable mixture. The limits of flammability of
propane respectively. Mixtures of commercial butane LPG are approximately 2% to 10% volume of gas in
and commercial propane are also handled. air and this results in LPG leakage forming large
volumes offlammable gas-air mixtures.
1.1.5 1 volume of vapour can form 10 to 50 volumes of
LPGmay be produced as an odourless product. For flammable gas-air mixture..
general usage it is odorized as necessary to permit 1 volume of liquid can form 2,500 to 12,500 volumes
detection of leakage by smell (see 1.4). offlammable gas-air mixture.
I
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
,
Table I The cooling which occurs on evaporation of liquid
Typical properties of commercial LPG grades. LPG causes frost bums to the skin anddamage to eyes
thng mi if protection, e.g. gloves and goggles, is not used
Commercial Commercial when contact with LPG is a possibility.
Property butane propane
Refrigerated LPG causes severe frost burns and eye
Density at atmospheric damage even if little or no evaporation occurs.
boiling point, kgAitre 0.60 0.51
Density at 15 "C, kg/litre 0.57 0.51 1.3.7
m3/tonneat 15 "C 1.72 1.96
LPG whether in liquid or vapour form is only slightly
Density of vapour com-
paredwith air at 15C toxic. The vapour is an asphyxiant in high concen-
and 1bara 2.00 1S O trations and is anaesthetic. Thus precautions must be
Ratio of vapour volume to taken in entering confined spaces such as tanks
liquid volume at 15 "C because of these properties of the LPG (and also
and 1bara 230 270
Boiling point at because of its flammability and the risk of reduced
atmosphericpressure 0 "C -44C oxygen levels).
Vapour pressure bara,
-40C - 1.4 1.3.8
0 "C 2. 8.0 Liquid LPG has a high coefficient of expansion.
45 "C 5 18
Adequate ullage must therefore always be provided
nhit ha Latent heat of vaporiz-
ation, k J k g at 15 "C 372 358 in storage vessels (static and transport) to prevent
hi
Specificheat of liquid at them becoming hydraulically full as a result of tem-
15 "C, kJ/(kg"C) 2.4 2.5 perature rise. Pipelines and equipment which are
Limitsof flammability normally liquid full must be protected, by operating
vol%in gas-air mixture procedures andor safety equipment, against the high
at atmospheric pressure 1.8-9.0 2.1-10
pressure which would result from the liquid's expan-
sion with temperature rise.
1.3.3 1.3.9
LPG at ambient temperature and normal atmos- A container which has held LPG and is nominally
pheric pressures is normally a gas which is heavier empty is still potentially dangerous. In this state the
than air. Commercial butane vapour and commercial internal pressure is approximately atmospheric and
propane vapour are approximately 2.0 and 1.5 times should the valve be open or leaking a jlummable
as heavy as air, respectively. LPG vapours will there- mixture may result due to air diffusing into the con-
fore sink to the lowest levels of the surroundings and ruiner when temperatures fall or vapour issuing from
flow along the ground or through drains or such-like the container when temperatures rise.
passages. Under still air conditions the natural dissi-
pation of accumulated vapour may be slow. 1.3.10
The density of liquid LPG is approximately half that
1.3.4 , of water, and when leakage occurs in low ambient
A small release of LPG into the atmosphere will temperatures the product could be carried away by
result in a flammable.mixture which may be ignited water.
some distance from the point of leakage.
1.3.11
1.3.5 If water is used for hydraulic testing of storage etc.
LPG has a low viscosity; hence it has little or no then its weight and not that of the LPG contents is
lubricating properties and it is more likely to find a relevant for foundation design.
leakage path than water or most other petroleum
products. These facts are significant with respect to 1.3.12
the design of plant and have particular relevance to The presence of water in LPG systems presents a
the glands and seals of pumps, compressors and hazard from icing under certain conditions (see 1.5).
valves.
2
PROPERTIES OF LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
3
2
PRESSURE STORAGE. AT
REFINERIES, BULK
DISTRIBUTION PLANTS AND
LARGE INDUSTRIAL
CONSUMER PREMISES
4
PRESSURE STORAGE
(d) That spillage from one vessel or work area does 2.2.2.6 The permitted radiation level on thermally
not flow under any other vessel or directly to any protected adjacent LPG storage vessels is based on the
other important facility/work area. protection of the adjacent vessel, e.g. by the appli-
cation of cooling water at the rate specifiedin 2.9.6.4.
2.2.2.2 LPG pressure storage vessels, pump bays and Where cooling water is the method of protection
loadingldischarge facilities shall be located to ensure then its provision and application must be reliable.
the following minimum distances to fixed sources of Equivalent protective systems are acceptable pro-
ignition irrespective of the requirements of 2.2.2.1: vided their efficiency can be demonstrated at the
specified radiation level and over the expected dur-
22.5 m For storage vessels not exceeding 337 m3 ation of the fire.
30 m For storage vessels exceeding 337 m3
25 m For pump bays and loadinghnloading 2.2.2.7 The minimum cooling water application rate
facilities of 7 litres/(minute m2) specified in 2.9.6.4 is based on
Deflection walls may be used to extend the vapour protection of a pressure storuge vessel against flame
travel path from leakage as identified in 2.2.2.4 to engulfment, rather than by thermal radiation, and is
meet these safety distances. therefore higher than would be calculated when using
Such walls should be so located as to minimize the the method given in Appendix 5.
risk of flame engulfment of storage vessels, in the The required cooling water application rate for
event of ignition of escaped product and also so as to other equipment referred to in Appendix 1 may be
ensure free ventilation of the storage area from at calculated by the method in Appendix 5. i
least three directions, taking account of prevailing
winds. 2.2.2.8 In the case of below-groundlmounded LPG
pressure storage, in addition to meeting the require-
2.2.2.3 The radiation flux levels laid down in Table I ments of Appendix 1 for a relief valve and spill fire,
of Appendix 1 shall be based on the ignition of there shall also be a minimum spacing of 3 metres
product discharging from the vessel's relief valves as between the vessel shell and the site boundary.
well as spillage from the vessel, its appurtenances and
other identified leak sources (see Appendix 3), and 2.2.2.9 In the event that the requirements of Table 1
possibly forming a pool of a size dictated by the of Appendix 1 dictate lesser distances then there shall
spillage rate, evaporation rate and duration (see be a minimum spacing between adjacent above-
2.2.2.4) and the local topographyAocation of a bund ground LPG pressure vessels of 1.5 metres or 0.25
or impounding basin. times the sum of the adjacent vessel diameters,
The atmospheric conditions relevant to the site whichever is the greater. For below-ground mounded
shall be applied in determining the flux levels. storage the spacing between adjacent vessels shall be
Calculation methods are described in Appendix 2. determined by the site conditions and the require-
ments for safe installatiodremoval of such vessels as
2.2.2.4 The rate of spillage and its duration used in well as their inspection, testing and maintenance.
2.2.2.3 shall be based on identified potential leak
sources in the system. The identification and quanti- 2.2.2.10 The maximum number of vessels in any
tative assessment of such leak sources require a sys- Group shall be 6. Any one group shall be separated
tematic evaluation of the design and operating pro- from any other group by 15 m.
cedures, taking into account failure modes and the
likelihood of their occuriing. 2.2.2.11 In any group vessels shall be in a single line,
Examples of potential leak sources and indications i.e. shell to shell and not end to shell or end to end.
of leakage rates from them under specific conditions
and using a simplified typical equation are given in
Appendix 3.
2.2.3 Bunds and Separation Kerbs
2.2.2.5 Provision should be made to minimize the
probability of aflammable cloud resulting from a spill 2.2.3.1 The provision of bun& around above-ground
as defined in 2.2.2.3 from reaching the site boundary. LPG pressure storage designed and constructed in
Typical provisions may include such measures as accordance with the requirements of this code is not
spacing, limitation of spill pool area, screening and normally required.
vapour dispersion equipment.
Appendix 3 provides examples of potential leak 2.2.3.2 Separation kerbs, low to avoid gas traps, with
sources and typical leak r a t e s a d Appendix 4, refer- a maximum height of 0.6 m may be required to direct
ences to mathematical models for kalculating hazard spillage to suitable places away frrm storage vessels
distances arising from such releases. and other vulnerable equipment.
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
2.2.6 Other Hazardous Storage 2.3.1.2 Careful consideration should be given to the
No pressure vessel for LPG should be located within material used for construction, bearing in mind the
the bunded enclosure of minimum temperature that the material of the vessel
could reach in service or an emergency. Such a
(a) a tank containing anyflammable liquid,
minimum temperature may well be below the
(b) a tank containinig liquid oxygen or other hazard-
minimum ambient temperature in emergency situ-
ous or cryogenic substance,
ations and may also be so for vessels with high offtake
(c) a tank containing refrigerated LPG or liquefied
rates in normal service.
natural gas (LNG),
(d) a heated storage tank, e.g. residual fuel oil or
2.3.1.3 Vessels for a partially refrigerated product
bitumen.
should be designed in accordance with the low tem-
perature requirements of the code referred to in
2.2.7 Layout of Storage
2.3.1.1.
The layout and grouping of above-ground vessels, as
distinct from spacing, should receive careful consider-
ation to ensure accessibility for fire-fighting and to
2.3.2 Design Criteria tiu chun thit k
avoid spillage from one vessel flowing under any other
or to any vulnerable equipment.
2.3.2.1 The design pressure of the conrainer should
be not less than the vapour pressure of the actual LPG
2.2.8 Protection of Facilities to be stored in it, at the highest temperature that such
contents will reach in service and should also take into
2.2.8.1 To prevent unauthorized access, the area account any additional pressures developed in oper-
which includes vessels, pumping equipment and load- ation.
inghnloading facilities should be enclosed by an The vapour pressure is dependent on the surface
industrial ,type fence at least 2 m high unless it is temperature of the contents and not the bulk mean
otherwise adequately protected, e.g. the area comes temperature.
within a greater fenced plant area or is otherwise
isolated from the public. 2.3.2.2 For partially refrigerated pressure storage the
capacity of the refrigeration plant andor the insu-
2.2.8.2 When damage to LPG systems from vehicu- lation system should be such that the LPG is main-
lar traffic is a possibility, precautions to guard against tained at a temperature at which its vapour pressure is
such damage must be taken. below the set to discharge pressure of the relief valve.
2.2.8.3 Below-ground and mounded storage should 2.3.2.3 The design of the buriedlmounded vessel
be protected from above-ground loadings due to should allow for any differential settlement/move-
vehicular traffic or other cause, either by fencing off ment (including frost heave) as well as for the weight
the area under which the storage is buried or by the of superimposed loads.
use of reinforced concrete slab or other cover
adequate to prevent the weight imposing concen- 2.3.2.4 Vacuum conditions
trated direct loads on the vessel. If operating conditions may be 'expected to lower
If the storage area is not fenced off, the vessel product. temperatures to the extent that the vapour
manhole cover and other fittings should be protected pressure of the stored product falls below atmospheric
against damage and tampering. pressure, e.g. butane under very cold conditions,
The perimeter of the area under which storage is then either the vessel should be designed for the
buried should be permanently marked. necessary degree of vacuum or the system should
6
PRESSURE STORAGE
incorporate positive means for preventing vacuum 2.3.6.3 Pressure setting of relief valves
formation. The pressure at which relief valves start to discharge
and reach full flow should be in accordance with the
2.3.3 Fittings vessels design code, e.g. BS 5500, ASME Section
Each vessel should be provided with at least one of VIII.
each of the following fittings, all of which should be
suitablefor use with LPG over the vessels design 2.3.6.4 Capacity of relief valves
range of pressure and temperature: The full vapour flow capacity for relief valves should
be determined for a vessel exposed to fire conditions
(a) pressure relief system connected directly to the
in accordance with API RP520 or equivalent. How-
vapour space,
ever, the relief valves must also provide protection
(b) manhole,
against any overpressure resulting from overfilling,
(c) drain system,
when relief valve discharge would be flashing liquid.
(d) meansof determining the liquid level (see 2.3.5),
For above-ground vessels no credit should be taken
(e) pressure indicator connected to the vapour space,
for the effect of any insulation on limiting heat absorp-
(f) temperature indicator for contents,
tion unless the insulating material has adequate fire.
(g) maximum level device, e.g. high level alarm,
resistant properties.
fixed ullage gauge.
In sizing relief valve capacity for moundedlburied
storage credit may be taken for the inherent insulation
2.3.4 Connections provided by the covering material, as specified in the
relevant code.
2.3.4.1 Connections should be minimized, particu-
larly those below the maximum liquid level. 2.3.6.5 Relief valve marking
Every relief valve should incorporate permanent
2.3.4.2 Connections should be designed and attached markings as follows:
to the vessel in accordance with its design code, e.g.
BS 5500, ASME Section VIII. Connections should (a) manufacturers identification, including
preferably be welded and flanged but screwed connec- -manufacturers name or symbol,
tions smaller than 50 mm to BS 3799 or equivalent -catalogue or type number,
may be used. (b) nominal inlet and outlet sizes,
(c) start to discharge pressure,
2.3.4.3 The manhole should be not less than 0.55 m (d) certified capacity in defined terms.
internal diameter.
2.3.6.6 Relief valve installation
2.3.4.4 For below-ground and mounded vessels the (a) Where provision is made to isolate any relief
manholes and connections should be extended to suit valve for periodic servicing or testing, the relief
the depth of cover, i.e. to facilitate access to valves, valve or valves which remain connected to the
etc. vessel should provide the full capacity required
by 2.3.6.4. Relief valve connections to vessels
2.3.5 Level Gauging Equipment should be as short as possible and should not
Consideration should be given to providing two inde- throttle relief valve discharge.
pendent level gauges in addition to the maximum (b) In discharge lines the formation of liquid traps
level device. Column type gauge glasses for determin- and the creation of back pressures, which might
ing liquid level are not acceptable. prevent the proper functioning of the relief valve,
should be avoided. Particular attention should be
2.3.6 Pressure Relief paid to this aspect when discharge lines are long,
e.g. discharge into flare lines.
2.3.6.1 Code requirements (c) Relief valves, discharging directly to atmosphere,
The requirements for pressure relief as specified in should be fitted with vent pipes, be adequately
the vessels design code, e.g. BS 5500, ASME Section supported and have outlets at least 2 m above the
VIII, must be complied with. top of the vessel and any access platform to which
they are fitted and at least 3 m above ground level.
2.3.6.2 Pressure relief valves (d) Vent pipes should be corrosion resistant and be
(a) Relief valves should be spring loaded; weight designed to allow the escape of moisture and
loaded relief valves should not be used. condensate. They should ensure that, in the event
(b) Relief valves should be constructed so that the of ignition of discharging vapour, flame impinge-
breakage of any part will nofobstruct the free ment on the vessel or any adjacent vessel, piping,
discharge of vapour under pressure. equipment or structure is avoided.
7
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
8
PRESSURE STORAGE
2.3.14.3 The backfill or covering material which will 2.4.2.3 Seamlesssteel, seamless copper or brass pipe
be in contact 'with below-ground or mounded vessels or tubing may be used for sizes up to and including
should be clean and free from rocks'or similar abras- 12.5 mm. It is recommended, however, that non-
' ive material. The backfilYcoveringmaterial should be ferrous pipe or tubing should be confined to instru-
carefully consolidated and the covering of mounded ment piping, piping for control equipment or vapour
vessels prevented from migration. The minimum lines and should be as short as practicable.
cover provided should be 500 mm.
2.4.2.4 All pipes larger than 12.5 mm, up to and
2.3.14.4 For above-ground vessels finish painting in a including 400mm, should be seamless (API 5L Grade
light colour increases reflection and minimizes tem- B rnax 0.23% carbon). Pipes larger than 400 mm may
perature rise of the contents from solar heat gain. be submerged arc welded (API 5L Grade B max
0.23% carbon or equivalent).
2.3.15 Marking For temperature service down to -38C carbon
'
Each pressure vessel should be conspicuously and steel seamless pipe should be used 'for all sizes (API
permanently marked to include the following: 5L Grade B rnax 0.23% carbon or equivalent).
For temperature service down to -50C sizes
(a) the pressure vessel code to which it is designed
larger than 12.5 mm, up to and including 400 mm,
and constructed,
should be seamless fine grained steel (An33 Grade 6
(b) the manufacturer's name and serial number,
rnax 0.23% carbon). Sizes larger than 400mm may be
(c) the capacity in defined units,
electric fusion welded to ASTM A671 Grade CC 65
(d) the maximum and minimum safe working press-
Class 32 max 0.23% carbon (base material A 516
ure,
Grade 65 or equivalent).
(e) the minimum safe working temperature, .
(f) the date of the original test, test pressure and the
symbol of the inspecting authority and space for 2.4.3 Pipe Thickness
subsequent inspectionhest markings. Irrespective of the design code used, minimum pipe
thickness shall be as follows:
Markings should be on a corrosion resistant metal
plate attached to the vessel located so as to remain Nominal pipe size Minimum thickness
visible.
Under 150mm
2.3.16 Identification Except for screwed connections Schedule40
Pipe with screwed connections Schedule80
Vesselsshould carry a number or other suitable mark- (seeClause2.4.4)
ing, plainly visible for easy identification. 150mm 6.4mm
200 to 300mm inclusive Schedule 20
2.3.17 Examination 350 mm and larger Schedule 10
Each pressure vessel should be inspectedtested at
intervals by a competent person and the date of the The schedule thicknesses referred to are those
last inspectionhest marked permanently and clearly specified in BS 1600 and ANSI B 36.10.
on its data plate (see 2.11 regarding inspection).
2.4.4 Pipe Joints
2.4 PIPING, VALVES AND FITTINGS 2.4.4.1 Joints on piping runs should preferably be
welded joints.
2.4.1 Design Code
Piping systems should conform to the provisions of a 2.4.4.2 Pipe joints of 50 mm nominal size and larger
recognized piping code as appropriate, e.g. BS 3351 should be welded or flanged. Joints smaller than
or ANSI B 31.3. 50 mm nominal size may be welded, flanged or
screwed.
2.4.2 Materials
2.4.4.3 Screwed joints should not be used in buried
2.4.2.1 All materials, including non-metallic parts piping or for low temperature service except for small
for valves, seals, gaskets and diaphragms should be diameter lines such as instrument lines and pressure
resistant to LPG under the service conditions to gauge connections.
which they are subjected.
2.4.5 Welding
2.4.2.2 With the exception of the permissive use of
valves of nodular iron as noted in 2.4.6.4 cast iron 2.4.5.1 QualificatiGs for welding procedures and
materials should not be used. welders should be in accordance with the require-
9
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
ments of BS 4871, BS 2633, ANSI B 31.3 or their 2.4.9 Installation and Flexibility
- ..equivalents.
2.x9.1 All pipelines should have adequate flexibility
to accommodate settling of vessels or other equip-
2.4.6 Valves ment, thermal expansion and contraction or any other
stiesses which may occur in the pipework system.
2.4.6.1 The primary shutoff valves for vessels should
be of the fire-safe type and of steel or nodular iron to 2.4.9.2 Flexibility should preferably be provided by
BS 2789 or equivalent. the use of bends or loops. Where lack of space
prohibits the use of these methods of obtaining flexi-
2.4.6.2 Liquid line valves should preferably be of the bility, suitable expansion joints of the bellows type,
fire-safe type and of steel or nodular iron to BS 2789 properly anchored and guided, may be used. Bellows
or equivalent. should be protected from torsional loads.
2.4.6.3 Forged brass valves with bronze trim may be 2.4.9.3 Piping should preferably be laid above
used for line valves but the lower melting point of ground and be protected against both physical dam-
these materials in the event of a fire should be taken age and corrosion. When piping must extend through
into consideration. a wall or be buried, it should be protected against
physical damage, from superimposed loads and cor-
2.4.6.4 With the exception of the use of valves of rosion.
nodular iron made to an appropriate standard, e.g.
BS 2789,cast iron valves should not be used. 2.4.9.4 The need for bracing/protection of small bore
connections should be considered, particularly those
located near to rotating or other equipment or where
2.4.7 Flanges and Fittings accidental impact is possible.
2.4.7.2 Slip-on or weld neck raised face flanges are 2.4.10.1 Any equipment or section of pipeline in
preferred; screwed flanges may be used for sizes which liquid may be trapped, e.g. between shut-off
smaller than 50 mm except in piping for low tempera- valves, should be protected by the use of operating
ture service. procedures or suitable equipment against excessive
pressure caused by thermal expansion of the contents.
2.4.7.3 Steel butt welding fittings, other than flanges,
should be to BS 1640, ANSI B 16.9 or equivalent 2.4.10.2 To meet the requirements of 2.4.10.1 the
standard and be at least of the same schedule thick- minimum setting of relief valves should not be less
ness as the pipe. For pipe to BS 3601 and BS 3602butt than the maximum pressure under normal operating
welding fittings to BS 1965 should be used. conditions of the section of pipeline which they are
protecting, and the maximum setting should be not
2.4.7.4 Steel socket welding and screwed fittings and more than the design pressure.
screwed couplings should be to BS 3799, ANSI B
16.11or equivalent standard. 2.4.10.3 If pressure relieving devices discharge to
atmosphere, the discharge should be arranged in a
2.4.7.5 Steel unions should be to BS 3799 or equiv- safe manner.
alent standard. They should have ground metal-to-
metal seats; gasket type unions should not be used.
2.4.11 Insulation
2.4.7.6 Plugs should be solid steel plugs or similar to
BS 3799 or equivalent standard. Cast iron or brass 2.4.11.1 Pipeline insulation should be in accordance
plugs should not be used. with the requirements of BS 3351, ANSI B 31.3 or
their equivalents.
2.4.7.7 Spirally wound gaskets are recommended for
LPG service (see BS 3381). 2.4.11.2. Insulation, steam heating or other means
should be used to prevent icing of valves or other
fittings if product quality, operating procedures a n d
2.4.8 Bolting or ambient temperatures are favourable tokdhyd-
Bolting should be to BS 4882or equivalent standard. rate formation.
10
PRESSURE STORAGE
2.4.14.4 Testing
2.5.4 Loadings
Hoses should be tested periodically to their maximum The greatest combined effect of dead and imposed
working pressure and for electrical continuity, the loadings should be used for the design as incurred by
frequency of test depending on the amount of use. the following factors; it is recommended that the
Records of these tests should be kept. relevant authority be approached for local infor-
mation on appropriate meteorological records:
2.4.14.5 Protection
dead loading: weight of vessel, supports and con-
Hoses when not in use should be protected from tents,
deterioration. test loading: weight of test fluid,
wind loading: shape factor, height, exposure and
2.4.15 Emergency Shutdown suction effect on leeward side,
Emergency valves, e.g. breakaway couplings, excess snow loading,
flow valves, automatically operated valves or earthquake loading,
remotely controlled valves, should be installed in superimposed loading (in the case of below-
pipelines to which hoses and articulated pipe connec- ground or mounded vessels),
tions are linked to limit discharge of LPG in the event operational loading: vibration3hermal (natural
of their failure. and operational), cyclic.
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
12
~~ ~ ~
PRESSURE STORAGE
minimize the risk of operator errors, e.g. propane in 2.7.3 Loading and Unloading Equipment
butane equipment.
Equipment should be clearly marked, particularly 2.7.3.1 Flexible connections between the fixed load-
at crossover points, to show the grade of LPG it is inghnloading facilities and the roadrail vehicle may
designed to handle. be by articulated pipe connections (see 2.4.12) or
hoses (see 2.4.14). They should enable connection to
2.6.5.2 There should be a means of rapid shut-off but be made with correctly positioned vehicles without
resultant surges must be considered at the design incumng undue strains on fixed facilities or transport
stage. unit connections. Emergency valves in accordance
with 2.6.5.4 should be installed.
2.6.5.3 If automatic alarm devices are used to indi-
cate approach to maximum permissible filling level or 2.7.3.2 Readily accessible means should be provided
automatic shut-off valves to prevent overfilling, then to enable the operator to shut off the flow of LPG in
they should be independent of, and not operated by, an emergency.
the primary level gauge(s) on the vessel.
2.7.3.3 Safety systems should be provided which will
2.6.5.4 To prevent uncontrolled discharge of LPG in prevent roadrail vehicle movement, either accidental
the event of hose or articulated pipe connection or driveaway, before hoses or articulated arms are
failure, emergency shut-off valves, e.g. excess flow disconnected.
valves, automatic or remotely controlled valves,
should be installed in pipelines adjacent to the con- 2.7.3.4 Safety systems should be provided which will
nection. minimize product leakage in the event of roadrail
vehicle movement before hoses or articulated arms
are disconnected.
13
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
2.7.4 Stray Currents, Earthing and Bonding 2.9.3.3 The possibility of a major fire outbreak, and
_ . one leading to direct flame impingement e na srorage
2.7.4.1 General vessel, can be minimized by sound engineering in
Road and rail loadinglunloading facilities should be plant design and layout. Sound operating practice
electrically continuous with the rest of the product and adequate instruction of personnel with respect to
system (see 2.8.1 and 2.10.7.6(d)). notmal and emergency operating procedures are also
minimizing factors.
2.7.4.2 Rail sidings
Rail sidings for loadinglunloading of rail tank wagons 2.9.3.4 The cover provided for below-ground or
should be insulated from the main line to prevent rnounded storuge (see 2.2.8.4) will afford protection
stray currents from electrified lines or signalling track against direct flame impingement and will minimize
circuits (see 2.8.1). heat absorption from nearby fires.
2.9.4 Access
2.8 ELECTRICAL, STATIC Suitable access for fire-fighting equipment and fire
ELECTRICITY, LIGHTNING authority apparatus should be provided, and should
PROTECTION be kept clear at all times.
2.9.2 Control of Fires 2.9.6.4 Mobile equipment, fixed monitors, etc., and
fixed spray systems or combinations of them should
As small LPG fires can be extinguished using suitable be designed to permit the application of water at a
first-aid fire extinguishers, e.g. dry powder, units of rate equivalent to at least 7 Iitred(minute m2) of
adequate size should be available adjacent to all above-ground vessel surface area.
loadinglunloading points and other work sites, e.g.
pump areas. 2.9.6.5 All above-ground storage should be provided
with fixed spray systems designed to ensure that a film
2.9.3 Protection Systems of cooling water is applied to the whole surface of the
vessel to ensure that all surfaces including product
2.9.3.1 Each LPG storage vessel and each bulk load- pipelines in the immediate vicinity exposed to thermal
ingldischarge facility shall be provided with a fire radiation are protected.
protection system which will ensure its structural Provided sufficient back-up facilities are available
integrity under fire conditions, e.g. intensity, dur- the rate of water application from the fixed sprays
ation, as covered by the fire plan (see 2.9.1). need not.be the total required by 2.9.6.4 above.
2.9.3.2 Fire protection may be achieved by the use of 2.9.6.6 Hydrants where provided should be readily
spacing, location, insulation or similar systemsandor accessible at all times and so spaced as to provide for
by the use of cooling water. the protection of all the facilities.
14
PRESSURE STORAGE
2.9.6.9 Measures to prevent the freezing of cooling 2.10.1.3 Ladders, stairways, walkways and access
water supplies and frost damage to supply lines, spray platforms should be maintained in a safe condition.
systems, etc., must be provided.
2.10.2 Training
2.9.6.10 The application of cooling water on bulk
road vehicles and rail tank wagons whilst being Wed 2.10.2.1 All involved with the handling of LPG
or discharged 'must be possible from fixed spray sys- should understand the characteristics of the product
tems andor immediately available mobile equip and be familiar with the sections of this code relevant
ment. to their spheres of responsibility.
(c) In any emergency situation attempt to isolate the the completeness of the air removal and the
part of the plant affected. flammability of the issuing gas. The oxygen con-
(d) In a* emergency
- - situation account for all per- tent in thesystem should be reduced to a level
sonnel and evacuate all those not directly con- insufficient to support combustion.
cerned with handling the emergency. (e) A slight positive pressure must be maintained in
In the case of major leakage, large areas may be the LPG system during air displacement and
affected by the vapour cloud and the evacuation subsequent filling.
of personnel and removal of sources of ignition in
areas ahead of the cloud should be carried out. 2.10.5.4 Prevention of excessive chilling
Fires and LPG leaks must always be approached In filling the storage vessel and system care should be
in the same direction as the wind. taken to prevent excessive chilling of the LPG
LPG fires should normally be controlled but not pumped into it.
extinguished until the source of release can be
shut off. 2.10.6 Draining Water in Service
It must always be recognized that because of the
risk of weakening the shell in the vapour area, 2.10.6.1 Particular care should be exercised when
direct impingement of flame on a pressure vessel draining storage vessels in service in order to minimize
is particularly hazardous. Thus, in any fire situ- the escape of LPG. Of the two drain valves required
ation, where circumstances prevent successful by 2.3.10.1, that nearer to the vessel should be fully
protection of a vessel from the possibility of opened first and draining then controlled by gradually
failure, evacuation of all personnel from the pos- opening the second valve.
sibly affected area must be considered and, if If, on opening the second valve, no flow occurs,
necessary, carried out in accordance with the both valves should be closed immediately to allow
emergency plan. subsequent investigation.
On completion of the draining operation, the valve
2.10.5 Purging and Filling of Systems further from the storage vessel should be closed first,
then the other valve.
2.10.5.1 Permit to work systems
Permit to work systems should be operated when 2.10.6.2 When draining vessels equipped with de-
purging and filling storage vessels and systems involv- watering pots, the valve upstream of the dewatering
ing venting and draining. pot should always be closed before opening the drain
system downstream of the dewatering pot. The oper-
2.10.5.2 Oxygen content ation of the two valves downstream of the dewatering
When storage vessels and systems which contain air pot should be as described in 2.10.6.1.
are to be filled with LPG the oxygen content should
first be reduced to a safe level (see Appendix 6). 2.10.7 Transfer Operations
cryogenic, care should be exercised to ensure full tank wagons o r portable containers, the procedure
vaporization before entry into the LPG system to detailed in 2.10.7.2 to 2.10.7.8 should be followed.
avoid sub-cooling of anypart of the system.
When water is used for air displacement the use 2.10.7.2 Receiving vessels should always be checked
of freezing point depressants such as methanol that they are suitable to handle the gradeof LPG to be
may subsequently be necessary to avoid ice and transferred and that sufficient ullage exists to receive
hydrate formation in valves, pressure reducing the quantity involved.
equipment, etc.
2.10.7.3 The interconnecting liquid and vapour pip-
If LPG vapour is used to replace the air, then the ing system and manifold should be checked to ensure
vessel and system bill, for a period of time,
that it is in safe working condition and that only valves
contain a flammable mixture and a flammable
required for the transfer operation, and any operation
mixture will be vented; adequate precautions to
proceeding simultaneously, are open. A check should
prevent its uncontrolled ignition are essential.
also be made to ensure that:
In the case of air displacement by means of an
inert gas or LPG vapour, sampling and testing of (a) Grades of LPG cannot be charged into vessels,
the vessels contents and the mixture discharged pipelines or equipment not designed to handle
from the vents should be carried out to determine them.
16
PRESSURE STORAGE
Further points for attention include: periodic inspection is additional to and separate from
-
(a) signs of general or local deterioration of foun- routine monitoring, e.g. checking induced currents.--
dationdsupport structures due to flooding, etc., At periods not exceeding 5 years the vessel should
(b) condition and proper engagement of vessel sup- be internally inspected and wall thickness measure-
port anchor bolts, nuts and washers, ments made at key points on the shell, particularly
(c) examination of suppodskirt to vessel weld con- those for which past records indicate the possibility of
nections for cracking, etc., any changes occurring.
(d) checking whether any settlement of the foun- Checks should be made for any soil settlement
dations has occurred since last inspected, which could affect the structural integrity of the
(e) random checking of metal surfaces underneath vessel.
external insulation and fireproofing to determine All accessible nozzledconnections should be
the extent or otherwise of water/moisture pen- periodically inspected for signs of corrosion, damage,
etration, ascertaining the cause of any possible etc.
penetration and assessing whether further more
extensive external inspection should be pro- 2.11.6 Cracks
grammed. The possibility exists that cracks may be found during
inspections. Once located the depth of the crack
2.11.4 Internal Inspection-Above-ground Vessels should be established by non-destructive methods.
For internal inspections of above-ground LPGpress- This will normally give the information needed for
ure storage vessels a visual examination is generally all later assessment but in some borderline cases more
that is needed. Such a visual examination should be vigorous testing may be required.
supported by wall thickness measurements if past
records or the incident examination indicate that 2.11.7 Pressure Relief Valves valve gim p
corrosion may have occurred. The pressure relief valves and other associated con-
nections are of paramount importance and must be
2.11-5 Buried/Mounded Vessels regularly and thoroughly inspected for corrosion,
Any cathodic protection system installed should be blockage, etc., and the valves themselves tested and
thoroughly inspected at least once per year. This maintained at intervals not exceeding 5 years.
18
3
REFRIGERATED LIQUEFIED
PETROLEUM GAS STORAGE
the storage temperature such that a sudden failure of 3.2.5 Vapour Formation and Fire
this wall can be considered a non-credible mode of -.
failure. This will normally be the inner wall, but if 3.2.5.1 The size of the vapour cloud resulting from
sudden rupture of the inner wall cannot be ruled out liquid leakage can be minimized by:
as a credible mode of failure then the outer wall must
be designed to contain the liquid released by this (a) Limitation of the liquid pool area. Bunding close
failure mode. to a tank if of sufficient height and strength to
A double containment storage system is not hold the foreseen leakage (see 3.3.2) and thus
required to contain product vapour in the event of conforming to the requirements of a double con-
liquid leakage from the inner tank. tainment system (see 3.2.1.3) will result in a
lower rate of vapour formation than would be the
3.2.1.4 Full Containmentstorage system case for wider spaced bunds of the single contain-
A full containment storage system is one meeting all ment system (see 3.2.1.2). However, the full
the requirements of a double containment storage containment system (see 3.2.1.4) would provide
system (see 3.2.1.3) plus the additional requirement the greatest security against such vapour release.
that it shall avoid the uncontrolled release of product (b) Limitation of the heat transfer rate to the liquid
vapour in the event of liquid leakage from the inner pool. The surfacing of bunded areas with
tank. (In this context the release of vapour through materials which will limit the rate of heat transfer
pressure relief valves is considered a controlled to a liquid pool will minimize vapour formation.
release.)
3.2.5.2 If spillage is ignited the flame size, and con-
sequently the area affected by such a fire, will be
3.2.2 Level of Safety minimized by limitation of the liquid pool area.
Refrigerated storage tanks and groups of such tanks
when designed, constructed, located, spaced, pro- 3.2.5.3 If product leaking from a tank, and/or its
tected, operated and maintained within their design associated pipelines, into a bund results in a major
limits and in accordance with the requirements of this accumulation which is subsequently ignited it is pos-
code provide an acceptable level of safety for both sible that the resulting fire would not be extinguished
plant operators and the public. but be left to burn itself out. Therefore:
(a) Bund height need not be limited in order to
facilitate access to a tank/bund fire.
3.2.3 Rudent Provisions for Spillage (b) Tanks, working areas, process facilities, site
Whilst the integrity of a tank as per 3.2.2 above is boundary, etc., must be located or protected to
accepted, the complete absence of leakage/spillage limit the thermal radiation flux levels to which
must be regarded as an ideal and therefore it is they would be subjected as a result of such a fire.
prudent to provide sensible measures for the contain- Protection may be afforded by the use of suitable
ing and handling of such leakage/spillage and for spacing, insulation, screening, water application,
dealing with the possible consequences of its occur- etc., or by a combination of such measures.
rence.
20
REFRIGERATED LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS STORAGE
shall not exceed the relevant maximum levels given in 3.4.1.2 Each refrigerated storage tank shall be com-
Table 2 of Appendix 1. pletely surrounded by a bund unless the topography
of the area is such, either naturally or by construction,
3.3.1.3 The thermal radiation flux levels of 3.3.1.2 that spills (as defined in 3.3.2) will be directed safely
shall be based on the ignition of flammable product by gravity drainage and diversion walls, if required,
either in a tank or from spillage. In the case of spillage away from adjacent tanks, equipment and sensitive
the pool formed will be dictated by the spillage rate, areas to an inipounding basin suitably located within
evaporation rate and duration (covered by3.3.2) and the site boundary.
the topographyhocation of the site and facilities
associated with it. 3.4.1.3 Full and double containment systems (see
Reference should be made to Appendix 2 for guid- 3.2.1) by definition meet the requirement of 3.4.1.2,
ance on calculation of thermal. radiation levels with but low bunds may be required around tank main
respect to the LPG facilities. connections to contain leaks from external piping,
valves and fittings as dictated by the systematic evalu-
3.3.1.4 The calculationof radiation flux levels for the ation requirements of 3.3.2.
purpose of complying with 3.3.1.2 shall be based on
the size of lire resulting from the conditions laid down
in 3.3.1.3 and 3.3.2 and assuming the atmospheric 3.4.2 Bund Capacity
conditions relevant to the site.
3.4.2.1 For storage systems which do not conform to
the requirements of full or double containment sys-
3.3.2 Rate of Leakage tems (refer to 3.2.1) the bundfimpounding basin shall
The rate of leakage of flammable product and its be capable of retaining the total content above ground
duration, used in 3.3.1.3,shall be based on identified level or of the largest tank connected to any shared
potential leak sources in the facilities which need to impounding basin.
be considered. The identification and quantitative
assessment of leak sources should be based on a 3.4.2.2 Where low bunds are provided around tank
systematic evaluation of the design and operating connections (see 3.4.1.3) they should be of sufficient
procedures of such facilities, taking into account fail- capacity to contain the quantity of spillage likely to be
ure modes and the likelihood of their occumng. leaked into them (see 3.3.2).
Examples of potential leak sources from LPG
facilities and indications of leakage rates from them
under specific conditions are quoted in Appendix 3. 3.4.3 BundDesign
21
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
be given to sectionalization within a bund andor level in it shall always be kept above that in the outer
impounding basin (see
,)1.5.2.3 tank. -.
Outer shells constructed of prestressed concrete,
3.4.3.5 Bun& and impounding basins shall be pro- or reinforced concrete with an external earthen
vided with water removal systems designed to prevent embankment, do not require water testing unless
LPG spillages escaping into any system outside the specified by the user or approving authorities. Refer-
area of the bundlimpounding basin. ence should also be made to the EEMUA document
on RLG storage tanks.
3.4.3.6 The capacity and reliability of water removal
systems for rain water and fire water where applicable 3.5.1.4 All welds (both vertical and horizontal) shall
shall be sufficient to prevent the accumulation of such be 100% radiographed,.
quantities of water as would cause damage to the tank
foundations, bund wall, or lead to rank flotation. 3.5.1.5 Where applicable (see 3.2.1) metallic
materials should be selected with regard to their
3.4.3.7 Consideration should be given to the design toughness characteristics at the design temperature.
of b u n k and the installation of the necessary facilities The toughness requirements shall meet at least the
to allow for the safe recirculation of water because of requirements as specified in the standards referred to
the quantities which may be required in an in 3.5.1.1 or the code or standard to which the tank is
emergency. designed, constructed and tested.
3.5.1.2 All inner (primary) containers shall be tested 3.5.1.9 Normally, means, such as the recirculation of
to the maximum filling level with water. product, should be provided to avoid roll-over caused
by stratification in the tank.
3.5.1.3 Where the outer shell of double or full b n -
tainment systems is of metal this outer tank shall be 3.5.1.10 Tunks shall be designed to avoid flotation,
tested as per 3.5.1.2. Ho-ever, in order to prevent e.g. in the event of blockage'of bund drainage sys-
damage to the inner tank during this testing the water tems.
22
REFRIGERATED LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS STORAGE
23
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
3.5.4.7 The opening of vacuum valves must be carried on without opening the rank to atmosphere
- minimized by the provision of sufficiently reliable andwithout reducing relief capacity below design
vacuum protection systems. Such protection may requirements.
employ the systems indicated in 3.5.4.6.
3.5.4.12 Emergency relief valves should discharge
3.5.4.8 Pressure and vacuum relief valves should be directly to atmosphere.
fitted and sized in accordance with the standards to They shall be designed and installed so that:
which the tankisdesigned (see3.5.1.1),APIStandard
(a) Attached vent pipes are adequately supported
2000 or equivalent and with 3.5.4.9 and 3.5.4.10.
and have outlets at least 2 m above the top of the
Pressure relief valves should be adequate to relieve
tank to which they are fitted and at least 3 m
the worst case emergency flow, assuming all other
above ground level.
outlets from the rank, including that to the flare, are
(b) In case of ignition of the discharge, flame im-
closed.
pingement on the tank and its associated equip
ment is impossible.
3.5.4.9 The following factors require consideration
(c) In case of ignition of the discharge the radiation
in sizing pressure relief valves:
levels of Table 2 of Appendix 1are not exceeded.
Liquid entering the tank at maximum rate. This requirement may necessitate the installation
Maximum possible boil-off, assuming failure of of protective measures, e.g. water sprays.
the normal possible control system.
Maximum rate of decrease of atmospheric press- 3.5.4.13 Precautions must be taken to counter the
ure as determined from relevant meteorological effect of icing on relief valves. Special attention
records. (If not available, assume 5 mbarh.) should be given to prevent the possibility of freezing-
Emergency venting requirement as per API STD up of the vendflare system.
2000. No credit should be taken for the effect of
insulation on limiting heat absorption unless the 3.5.4.14 Vent pipes if fitted to relief valves must be
material has proven fire resistant properties. designed to allow the escape of moisture and conden-
Flame height should not be limited to the 30 ft as sate, and both they and any loose fitting rain caps
indicated in API Standard 2000 but be in accord- provided must not interfere with the safe operation of
ance with the calculated value (see 3.3.1 and the relief valves.
...
Appendix 2).
Effect of radiation from an adjacent (rank) fire 3.5.4.15 Care must be taken to prevent blockages
(see 3.3.1). due to liquid in vendflare lines, relief valve headers,
Effect of possible hot product run down into the etc. Therefore such lines should be free of pockets
tank. and slope towards a knock-out drum.
Flow of hot liquidvapour into tank, assuming
failure of the vacuum protection system.
Effect of possible contamination when different
products are handled.
3.5.5 Insulation of Tanks
3.5.4.10 The following factors shall be considered in
sizing vacuum relief valves: 3.5.5.1 A tank's external insulation and cladding
shall:
(a) Maximum possible liquid withdrawal rate.
(b) Maximum possible vapour withdrawal rate (as- (a) Be weatherproof and capable of withstanding
suming boil-off compressor system fails to trip). direct impingement of the cooling water from any
(c) Maximum increase in atmospheric pressure as fixed deluge system.
determined from relevant meteorological (b) Be impervious to the ingress of water vapour,
records. (If not available, assume 5 mbarh.) e.g. by the provision of an effective vapour bar-
(d) Vacuum conditions as a result of ambient tem- rier.
perature lower than the atmospheric boiling (c) Be sufficiently robust to ensure that minor
point of the product handled. mechanical damage will not destroy its vapour
(e) Cool-down of roof by spray-water after adjacent barrier.
(tank) fire (see 3.3.1). (d) Withstand a temperature of 1WCwithoutfailure
of its insulating or mechanical properties: it
3.5.4.11 Relief valve line-up should also be fire retardant and preferablyfire
Pressure and vacuum relief valves must be lined up _, resistant. (See also EEMUA Recommendations -
with block valves with spare positions and interlocks for the Design and Construction of Refrigerated
as necessary so that inspectiodmaintenance can be Liquefied Gas Storage Tanks.)
24
REFRIGERATED LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS STORAGE
3.5.6 Corrosion Protection of Tanks 3.6.3.2 Piping systems and their supports shall be
suitably insulatedprotected within those parts of the
3.5.6.1 The provision of an internalcorrosion allow- installation in which !ire exposure conditions or
ance is generally unnecessary. severe radiation from fires may be foreseen (see 3.8.2
and 3.8.3).
3.5.6.2 The tank shell and roof should be protected
against external corrosion. 3.6.4 Thermal Pressure Relief
25
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
counteract uplift, the foundations shall be designed to 3.8.3.4 When cooling water is the protective medium
resist the uplift at thedesign pressure but with the then each tank shall be equipped with a fixed deluge
tank empty. system capable of applying water at a rate sufficient to
ensure that as a result of a fire (see 3.8.1), e.g. such as
in an adjacent tanklbundlimpounding basin, all sur-
3.8 REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE faces including piping and structures exposed to ther-
PROTECTION/LOSS CONTROL mal radiation are prevented from exceeding 100C.
SYSTEMS
3.8.3.5 It is recommended particularly when water
3.8.1 Fire Plan supplies are restricted that the fixed deluge system
The concept of a loss control system should be based should be sectionalized to enable the water appli-
on the philosophy that a local mishap resulting in a cation rate to be varied on different parts of the
release of LPG into the atmosphere should not esca- system.
late to the extent that the facilities are endangered
and the public at large is subjected to an unacceptable 3.8.3.6 Remote control of the fixed water deluge
risk. system shall be possible from areas not exposed to
Such a concept should be based on a systematic excessive thermal radiation.
evaluation of the design and operational procedures
taking into account failure modes and consequences 3.8.3.7 Special consideration must be given to the
as outlined in3.3.1,3.3.2 and3.3.3as well asavailable quantities of water required for fire protection, and
resources. provisions such as recycling may have to be employed.
Because of the nature of the product an LPG Measures should be taken to ensure separation of the
release will always form a vapour cloud with the recycled water fromfiamrnable products.
possibility of ignition. The emphasis of the loss con-
trol system therefore should be focused on control of 3.8.3.8 Measures to prevent the freezing of cooling
fires and protection against heat radiation as covered water supplies and frost damage to supply lines, spray
below. systems, etc., must be provided.
26
[~EFRIGERATED LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS STORAGE
hydrostatic testing not being of Where a number of ranks in similar service have been
e.g. chloride or sulphatecontent constructed of similar materials and to a common
too high, design the results of the internal inspection of one
purging materials not dry andor truly inert, e.g. may be taken as a guide to the necessity for inspecting
products of combustion containing carbon others.
dioxide, which dissolves in water, adhering to the
rank walls, leading to stress corrosion,
contaminated product in the system, e.g. 3.9.6 Requirements for External Inspection
ammonia as a result of unsatisfactory cleaning of
a nondedicated tanker, 3.9.6.1 Pressure and vacuum refief vafves
contaminated vapour introduced into the system Tank pressure and vacuum relief valves and other
to prevent vacuum conditions. associated connections are of paramount importance
and must be regularly and thoroughly inspected for
3.9.4 Problems Associated with Internal Inspection corrosion, blockage, etc., and the valves themselves
During the considerable time involved in the total tested and maintained yearly.
procedure of taking out of service, purging, emptying,
inspecting and returning to service of a refrigerated 3.9.6.2 Bottom heating facilities
LPG storage rank, the following problems may arise The importance of preventing frost heave requires
which outweigh any benefits likely to be obtained that bottom heating system operations are checked
from routine internal inspections (see 3.9.2): regularly and a weekly frequency is recommended. In
addition the heating system itself shall be checked
The opening up of a sealedcorrosion-free system yearly.
entails the probability of introducing corrosion.
The increased risk of damage to and deterioration 3.9.6.3 Tank settlement
of the system during the lengthy non-routine Tank base levels and settlements shall be checked at
procedures involved. frequent intervals during a water test (i.e. at various
Internal inspection of a refrigeruted storage tank heights of water fill and during draining). After com-
requires the whole structure to be subjected to missioning, tank levels and settlements shall be
temperature cycling; until more experience is checked at yearly intervals for the first 3 years, follow-
available to indicate the absence of risk in this ing which the inspection period may be extended to
process it must be considered a potential problem 3-yearly periods if no problems have been encoun-
area. tered.
The procedures for taking out of service and
recommissioning can lead to changes in the insu- 3.9.6.4 Tanks with suspended roofs
lation system, e.g. compression and decom- Outer roofs shall be checked for external corrosion at
pression during warming up and cooling down intervals not exceeding 1year.
which can result in a loss of its flexibility, andor
ingress of water into the insulation because of a 3.9.6.5 Inspection as a part of normal operations
vapour seal leak (not possible whilst the runk is As a part of the normal operation of the facility there
still in cold service). should be an ongoing check for leakage andor mal-
Purging entails the disposal of gases which can operation. Tanks and pipelines should be inspected
form flanamable mixtures when mixed with air for cold spots, the zone between ranks and closehigh
and when large ranks are involved both the quan- bund walls should be monitored for LPG vapours, the
tities of product and the duration of the pro- space between the walls of full or double containment
cedures add substantially to the risks involved. storage systems should be checked for liquid LPG
and the condition of external insulation (and its
3.9.5 Requirements for Internal Inspection vapour barrier) controlled as a check on external
Internal inspection need only take place when: corrosion of the tank.
External inspection gives rise to concern such
that an internal inspection is considered necess- 3.9.6.6 Anchorage
ary, e.g. settlement, frost heave, foundation Holding down bolts and anchor straps should be
problems. checked for deterioration and tightness at intervals
Doubt exists regarding the quality of the stored not exceeding one year.
product, vacuum breaker gas or the previously
used test or purge medium such that a possibility 3.9.6.7 Piping
of internal corrosion is suspected. The filling.%d offtake piping including bellows and
The rank has been taken out of service for another spring supports should be checked annually for move-
specific purpose. ment.
27
LIOUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
3.9.7 Competent Person/Records tive densities of the purging medium and air to
All inspectimactivities should be carried out under minimize mixing;i;e. when the inert gas is lighter than
the supervision of competent personnel and should be air it should be introduced at the top of the tank
fully recorded. displacing the air downwards to a vent at the bottom
and, vice versa, where the purge gas is of the same
density as the air to be replaced it should preferably
3.10 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE be admitted at a point opposite to the discharge vent.
INITIAL FILLING OF STORAGE TANK
OR RE-COMMISSIONING AFTER
3.10.5 Displacement of Inerts by LPG Vapour
INSPECTION
3.20.5.1 Displacement of inerts is preferably done by
3.10.1 General
It is assumed that instructions in respect to examina- introducing cold LPG vapours into the bottom of the
tank and venting the inerts from the top. This method
tion of the tank to ensure its installation/inspection in
accordance with specification and readiness for use uses the so-called piston effect whereby the mixing of
will be made as for any other important piece of plant the LPG and inerts and therefore the product loss is
or equipment. This section therefore confines itself to minimized.
the special aspects of LPG filling. Where LPG vapours are not available inerts may
Attention is drawn to the necessity for ensuring be removed by the introductionof liquid LPG sprayed
that the tank and its ancillary fittings are not taken from the top of the tank. In applying this method
outside their design limits, e.g. pressure and tempera- extreme care should be taken to avoid sub-cooling of
ture, during the procedures of commissioning and tank materials to below the design temperature. This
re-commissioning. can happen as a result of the low LPG partial press-
ures which occur in the tank particularly in the initial
3.10.2 IceIHydrate Formation
stage of the operation. At low partial pressure the
Particularly during initial commissioning icehydrates boiling point temperature of the LPG will bebelow
may be formed as a result of residual water in the the atmospheric boiling point.
system. Appropriate methanol injection points
should be provided and emergency shut-down valve Note: To obviate local cold spots liquid LPG should
operation should be frequently checked during this never be introduced at the bottom of the tank.
period.
3.10.5.2 All gas discharged to atmosphere during the
3.10.3 Permit to Work Systems operation must be vented in a safe manner.
Permit to worksystems should be operated in connec-
tion with all procedures covered in 3.10. 3.10.6 Cooling Down and Commissioning
3.10.4 Removal ofAir-Drying Out 3.20.6.1 Cooling down will normally be achieved by
allowing LPG liquid to flash in the tank.
3.10.4.1 To avoid the risk of a flammable mixture The liquid is normally injected into the top of the
forming, air shall be removed from the tank and all tank via a spray nozzle system protected by strainers.
lines connected to it, prior to the introduction of LPG. In the early stages of the cool-down operation it is
extremely important to avoid liquid LPG falling on
3.10.4.2 Air is best removed by purging with an inert the bottom tank plates or impinging on the walls
gas such a s nitrogen. The purge gas must be dry, i.e. causing local cold spots outside the minimum design
have a dew point lower than the temperature of the temperature which could give rise to cracks in the
tank when in service. ranks plates or welds due to uneven temperature
distribution.
3.10.4.3 Because products of combustion contain The liquid injection rate will normally be steadily
carbon dioxide and this can lead to stress corrosion of increased until the tank reaches its working tempera-
wet tank walls, the use of inert gas generators (con- ture and a level of about six inches of liquid has
trolled combustion) should be avoided. accumulated on the bottom. At this point the cool-
down is considered to be completed and the normal
3.10.4.4 Purging shall be continued until the oxygen filling rate can be resorted to.
content is reduced at least to the level indicated in
Appendix 6. For operational reasons purging is also 3.10.6.2 The rate of cooling down which is controlled
normally continued if necessary until the tank is dry. by the rate of liquid injection musl be within the
design specification as given by the tank manufac-
3.20.4.5 Consideration should be given to the rela- turer.
28
REFRIGERATED LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS STORAGE
3.10.6.3 During the cool-down procedure pre- 3.11.3.4 Purging shall be continued at least until the
cautions must be taken to prevent vacuum conditions safe level indicated in Appendix 6% reached.
occumng, e.g. ensuring availability of make-up gas.
3.11.4 Sources of Inert Gas
3.10.6.4 During cool-down the pressure and tem-
perature of the tank and related piping and pipe 3.11.4.1 Dry nitrogen is preferable as a purging
supports shall constantly be monitored. Furthermore, medium to the.product of an inert gas generator
whilst the above procedure is being followed frequent which contains both water and carbon dioxide, factors
e made of all rank connec- promoting stress corrosion.
29
LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS
3.11.5.8 On completion of purging a positive press- (a) The oxygen content of the atmosphere within the
ure shall be maintained to prevent vacuum conditions tankhnfined space is not less than 20% by VOL.
being created by changes of ambient conditions. ume.
(b) There is no hazard arising from dangerous sub-
. 3.11.5..9 Throughout and on completion of purging a stances in the atmosphere.
tank will not be safe for entry without breathing
apparatus and notices to this effect must be promi- 3.11.7.4 Certificates issued in connection with
nently displayed at all entry points. 3.11.7.2 and.3.11.7.3 above must indicate clearly the
period for which they are applicable, when and what
3.11.6. Preparation for Entry further testing will be required and any other special
conditions relating to the entry, e.g. ventilation,
3.11.6.1 On completion of purging the rank contents arrangements for continuous communication with
will not support combustion, will not support respir- people inside and for rescue.
ation and may even contain toxic gases derived from
the originalflammable gas andor the inert gas.
3.11.6.3 If the inerts are to be replaced by.&, the 3.12.1.2 Personnel shall be formally instructed with
possible presence of unpurged pockets of LPG vapour respect to the processes and facilities with which they
must be recognized and all sources of ignition are involved before they have an active role in the
excluded from the area. operation of the plant. This instruction shall include
details of operating procedures and location, function
3.11.6.4 Air blowers used to assist in ventilation shall and limitation of instrumentation and equipment
be bonded to the rank to avoid the hazard of static both for normal operation and emergency situations.
electricity.
3.12.1.3 Plant personnel should be instructed in the
3.11.6.5 Ventilation of tanks should be continued fundamentals of fire fighting and fire control with
until the requirements of.3.11.7.3 are met. particular reference torrefrigerated LPG and the cor-
rect handling of the equipment provided for this
3.11.6.6 Oxygen shall not be used to ventilate ranks. purpose.
3.11.7.1 Before entry a check shall be made that the 3.12.2.1 Procedures and plans should be developed
tank has been positively isolated from every source of to handle emergencies arising from leakage, fire or
hazardous gas, liquid or vapour, e.g. by blanking off any other circumstance which could give rise to such
or physical disconnection. emergencies. Such plans should include all necessary
liaison with the local authorities, neighbouring indus-
3.11.7.2 Before any entry is made into a tank it is try or the general public.
essential for a competent person to establish that a
dangerous atmosphere does not exist. A certificate to 3.12.2.2 Plant personnel should receive regular
that effect must be issued authorizing entry and stat- instruction in their roles in the emergency plan as well
ing clearly any conditions applicable, e.g. necessity as in the practical handling of emergency situations.
for breathjng apparatus.
3.12.2.3 To ensure the adequacy of the emergency
3.21.7.3 Before any entry is made into a tank without procedures and personnel awareness of them, exer-
suitable breathing apparatus it is essential for an cises based on simulated incidents should be carried
authorized person to make further tests and to estab- out periodically with the participation of the public
.. lish that: emergency services which are available in the area.
30
REFRIGERATED LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS STORAGE
3.12.3 Commissioning, Gas Freeing and Entry into (a) Vapour produced during the transfer operation
Tanks will be safely handled.
Referenceshould be made to 3.10 and3.11. (b) Each grade of LPG can only be discharged into
tanks, pipelines or equipment designed to handle
3.12.4 Transfer Operations it.
(c) Unacceptable product contamination cannot
3.12.4.1 Receiving tanks should always be checked occur.
that they are suitable to handle the grade of LPG to be
transferred and sufficient ullage exists to receive the 3.12.4.3 The receiving tank should be monitoied to
quantity involved. ensure that it is not being filled above its safe working
level.
3.12.4.2 The interconnecting piping system and
manifold should be checked to ensure that it is in safe 3.12.4.4 Any transfer operation must be fully super-
working conditio cooled, and that only valves vised throughout by a competent person to enable
required for the immediate action in case of emergency. The depar-
operation are open. ture of this competent person requires the stopping of
the operation in a safe condition. .
31
Appendix 1
Chapters 2 and 3 of the code require that the design layout and location of storage and other facilities shall reflect
the thermal radiation flux limits defined in Tables 1and 2 for pressure and refrigerated storage respectively.
This approach may appear to ignore the time element which is significant in determining the hazard posed
by a particular thermal radiation flux level whereas in fact exposure has been taken into account in defining the
laid-down limits.
The decision by the IP not to include clearly stated exposure times in the design limits reflects their view that
currently there is insufficient agreed data available to enable such numbers to be quoted with the required level
of confidence.
Fillingldischargepoints 8 2,500
Plant boundary
Remote area (9) 13 4,000
Urban area (10) 5 1,500
Criticalarea (8) 1.5 500 . .
32
THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
user bng tra
Table2
Refrigerated storage lu tr bng cch lm lnh
Maximum thermal radiationflux levek
Site ' kWh2 BTU(he)
Equipment
Theouter surfacesof adjacent
lm lnh refrigerated storage tanks
Thermallyprotected (2) cch nhit 32 10,Ooo
Unprotected (3) 8 2,500
Plant boundary
Remote area (9) 13 4,000
Urban area (10) '5 1.500
Critical area (8) khu vc quan trng 1.5 500
dng xc nh li coi vi
bc x trn cho tng site c
Notes khong cch t bnh cha ti TB lm lnh t ko.
(1) The distance from an LPG pressure storage vessel to a refrigerated aorage tank is determined by the
requirement of Chapter 3 (see 3.3.1) and Table 2 of this appendix.
(2) Such facilitiedareas are protected by means of water sprays, insulation, radiation screens or similar systems.
(3) Protection is provided by spacing alone.
(4) Special consideration should be given to the location of floating roof tanks containing high vapour pressure
products since effective water cooling of their roof structures is impracticable.
( 5 ) A normally unoccupied area occasionally manned by trained and suitably clothed persons familiar both with
escape routes and opportunities for temporary shelter afforded by the process plant.
(6) A permanent building where personnel inside are shielded andor have shielded means of escape.
(7) An open area or small (e.g. temporary) building without shielded means of escape.
(8) This is either an unshielded area of critical importance where people without protective clothing may be
required at all times including during emergencies or a place difficult or dangerous to evacuate at short
notice (e.g. a sports stadium).
(9) An area only infrequently occupied by small numbers of persons, e.g. moorland, farmland, desert.
(10) An area which is neither a remote area nor a critical area.
(11) The allowable thermal radiation flux level is restricted for these facilities in view of the potentially longer
duration of exposure resulting from a refrigerated tanklbund fire.
33
Appendix 2
CALCULATION OF THERMAL
RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
1 Introduction
2 Discussion
2.1 Fire characteristics
2.2 Flame surface flux
2.3 Geometry of flameltarget
2.4 Additional factors
3 Calculation Methods
3.1 General equations
3.2 Liquid pool fires
3.3 Jet flames
References
Addendum-Calculation of Gas Velocity and Temperature (Jet Flames)
4 Figures
Figures 1 to 4 Geometry for view factor calculations
Figures 5 View factors for vertical cylinders
6 View factors for tilted (15') cylinders
7 View factors for tilted (30") cylinders
8 View factors for tilted (45") cylinders
9 View factors for tilted (60")cylinders
10 View factors for tilted (- 15') cylinders
11 View factors for tilted (-U)")cylinders
12 View factors for tilted (-45") cylinders
13 View factors for tilted (-60") cylinders
14 Attenuation due to atmospheric transmittance
5 Example Problems for Calculation of Thermal Radiation Flux Levels for Pool Fires
5.1 Standard data
5.2 Example 1. Propane pool fire
Figures 15 and 16
5.3 Example 2. Fire from roof of refrigerated propane storage tank
Figures 17 and 18 ...
5.4 Example 3. Fire from roof of refrigerated propane storage tank burning down to pool fire at ground level
Figures 19 and 20 i
34
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
1 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this appendix is to describe briefly the main factors which affect thermal radiation from fires and
to provide typical simple methods for estimating flux levels. The description is not intended to be exhaustive but
to give an indication of the relative importance of the various factors which are taken into account in the
calculation. The methods described are relatively easy to use and should be applicable to most types of fire where
the burning characteristics are known or can be estimated. When used with a proper appreciation of the variables
involved they should provide a reasonable estimate of thermal radiation flux levels. Other, more sophisticated,
calculation methods have been developed and may be more suitable for particular applications. However, it
should be recognized that the level of accuracy in any thermal radiation flux estimation will depend more on the
accuracy of the basic data (fraction of heat radiated, environmental conditions, burning rate, etc.) than on
differences in calculation methods.
The subject of thermal radiation from fires has received a great deal of attention in recent years and there is
a large bibliography of published information. In addition experimental work is currently in probess to extend
the data base on which the calculation methods depend. In this appendix reference is made only to published
information which is used in the calculation methods described.
2 DISCUSSION
In the context of this code of practice two types of LPG fire are of particular relevance. A pool fire is caused by
the ignition of an LPG liquid pool normally in some identifiable containment such as a b u d , impounding basin
, . ur storage rank with damaged roof. The second type is that resulting from ignition of a gas jet, e.g. from a relief
valve. While these two types of fire have very different characteristics the basic elements of the calculation are
common to both.
For the purposes of this discussion the parameters involved in the calculation are divided into three areas:
characteristics of the fire, c im
flame surface flux, thng lng b mt ngn la
geometry of flamdtarget. hnh hc ca ngn la
Each of these is important in determining incident radiant flux on a target.
estimation of flame surface flux is analogous to determining the fraction of heat radiated-F factor-in the API
RP521(1) point source calculation
-. method.)
Until recently little experimental work was available on flame surface flux from LPG pool fires, and
American Gas Association (AGA) data based on LNG tests (2) was often used for LPG. However, recent LPG
test data indicate a considerably lower flame surface flux for LPG fires. The difference is generally attributed to
obscuration of the LPG flame by black soot so that a significantfraction of the surface will not be emitting thermal
radiation at any particular moment.
As noted earlier flame surface flux is analogous to fraction of heat radiated, the F factor used in point
source calculation methods. For relief valve fires the F factors may differ considerably from traditional flare
design figures due to the different flame characteristics noted in 2.1 above.
3 CALCULATION METHODS
3.1 General Equations
The general equation for calculating thermal radiation on a target outside a flame may be taken as:
z = z0.gJ.t equation (1)
where tnh bc x nht
I = maximum radiation on target (kW/m2) bc x cc i ln mc tiu
Zo = radiation from flame surface (kW/m*) bc x cc t ngn la ln mc tiu
@ = configuration or view factor
T = atmospheric transmittance
Each of these terms is discussed in more detail in the followingsections for the particular types of LPG fire which
are of interest.
The above equation may be applied to all types of fire, but for calculations where the distance to the target
36
CALCULATION O F THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
is large compared with the dimensions of the flame a simpler method can be used. This considers the flame as a
point source of radiation, and the maximum incident radiation on a distant target is then given by:
bc x ti a truyn n im xa cn xt
I = (Q.F.r)/(4.n.dZ) equation (2)
where
Q = total heat release (kW) tng lng nhit pht ra
F = fraction of heat radiated
t = atmospheric transmittance ????????
d = distance from point source to target (m) khong cch t ngun pht x n b cha
A detailed description of this calculation method is given in API RP521(1).
37
2 LOI BC X NHIT L POOL FIRE V JET LAM
APPENDIX 2
experimental data on tank fires is currently not available it is proposed that this method should also be used for
tank fire calculations.
The approach involves the determination ofa number of factors specific to the fire.
--Size of the liquid pool
-Linear burning rate
-Length of the flame
-Deviation of the flame from the vertical
-Flame spillover from the edge of the pool
All these factorsare required to calculate:
-Radiation view factor ($)
-Radiation from flame surface (ZO)
-Atmospheric transmittance (T)
These factors are then combined to give:
-Incident radiant flux on the target ( I )
equation ( 5 )
38
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
where
L = flamelength(m)
D = pooldiameter(m)
M = mass burning rate (kg/m2 s)
ea = ambient air density (kg/m3)
g = gravitational acceleration (m/s2)
and M is defined by
M = V.e,
where
V = linear burning rate (ds)
el = liquid density (kg/m3)
This correlation was derived from observations on the burning of wood piled in rectangular cribs, but Brown (6)
has confirmed its applicability to LNG fires, and indeed it is generally accepted as being universally applicable
and sufficiently accurate for LPG fires.
where
8 = angle of flame tilt (")
U * = dimensionlesswind velocity
and U is defined by
equation (7)
where
U = windspeed(m/s)
M = mass burning rate (kg/m2s)
ev = vapour density (kg/m3)
g = gravitational acceleration ( m / s 2 )
D = pool diameter (m)
evis measured at saturated conditions and normal boiling point.
Additional complications are to be expected in modelling pool fires, because of the presence of ranks and
other structures. It is difficultto take into account the effect on flame size due to the presence of structures, and
the fire characteristics in the presence of a strong wind are difficultto model. Thewake flow behind tanks and the
wind flow over dike walls may influence the pool burning significantly.
39
APPENDIX 2
where
U = windspeedtds)
g = gravitational acceleration (m/s2)
D = pool diameter (m)
This correlation may be used for circular ground level pools but is not ideal. In the case of a tank roof fire flame
spillover may be lower but no correlation is currently available.
For the purpose of thermal radiation calculations it is assumed that the liquid pool is displaced by (D- D)
metres in the direction of the wind.
3.3 JetFlames
The term jet flame has been used to describe the type of flame produced in the following situations:
(a) aflare, st nh
(b) ignited vapour or vapourhiquid released from a relief valve, chy u ra valve x khn cp
(c) ignited leakages from high pressure pipework or process vessels. r r t ng ng, b a/s cao.
In other words, situations in which the flame shape is influenced by the initial momentum of the release.
The most widely used method for this type of calculation has been that recommended in API RF521(1). This
uses a point source of heat approach as shown in equation (2) and has proved to be entirely satisfactory for its
main application in sizing and locating elevated flare stacks. This type of calculation generally involves gas exit
velocities in the range 0.2 to 0.5 Mach and targets of interest relatively distant from the point source of heat.
For the present applications it may be necessary to calculate thermal radiation flux levelsfor ignited relief
valve discharges (where the exit velocity from the discharge pipe approaches 1.0 Mach) on targets which are
closer to the flame. For these types of application a modification of the API RP521 point source method is
appropriate for the reasons described below.
A high velocity gas release will entrain air more rapidly into the gas jet resulting in a shorterflammablejet
length. If the release is ignited the flame length will be correspondingly shorter than for a low velocity (flare design
40
CALCULATION O F THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
basis) release. In addition the flame will tend to lift off from the point of release, thereby moving the source of
radiation to a higher elevation.
A second characteristic of high velocity jet flames is a cleaner, less radiative flame due to the more efficient
gadair mixing. Estimates of the extent of this effect are included in the calculation methods.
The use of a simple point source of radiation at the flame centre can lead to increasing errors in thermal
radiation calculations as the distance between flame and target decreases. For close targets the distribution of
radiative heat over the lengthofthe flame becomes increasingly important, as does the flame shape in determining
the distance between the radiating source (flame surface) and the target.
With this background the followingmethods are proposed for the various types of jet flame calculation which
may be required.
REFERENCES
(1) API. Guidefor Pressure Relief and DepressurisingSystems. API RP521 (Sept. 1982).
(2) AGA Project IS-3-1.LNG Safety Programme-Interim Report on Phase I1 Work. Battelle (July 1974).
(3) McGuire, J. H.Heat Transfer by Radiation. Fire Research Report No. 2 (1953).
(4) Raj, P. P. K. Calculationsof Thermal Radiationfrom LNG Fire-A Review ofthe State-of-the-Art.Paper No. 77-T-33,
AGA Transmissionconference, Missouri (19n).
(5) Rein. R.G., Sliepcevich, C. M., and Welker, J. R. J. Fire and Flammability, 1 (1970).
(6) Brown, Wesson, H.R., and Welker, J. R. Predict LNG fire radiation. Hydrocarbon Processing (May 1974).
(7) Mizner, G.A., and Eyre, J. A. Large scale LNG and LPG pool fires. I. Chem. E. The Assessment of Mujor Hazards.
Manchester (April 1962).
(8) Burgess, D., and Zabetakis, M. G. Fire and Explosion Hazards Associated with LNG. USBM Report 6099 (1962).
(9) Stark, G.W. V. Liquid Spillage Fires. I. Chem. E.Symposium Series No. 47.
(10) Thomas, P. H.The size of flames from natural fires. 9th International Conference on Combustion(1963).
(11) Moorhouse, J. Scaling criteria for pool fires derived from large scale experiments. The Assessment of Major Hazards. I.
Chem. E. (NW Branch), Manchester, April 1982.
(12) British Gas plc (Publication pending).
(13) Brzustowski, T. A., and Sommer, E.C. Predictingradiant heating from flares. API Division of Refining-Proceedings.
Vol. 53 (1973).
(14) Chamberlain, G . A., et al. Developments in design methods for predicting thermal radiation from flares. I. Chem. E.,
Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 65, No.4 (July 1987).
41
APPENDlX 2
,
Calculate total mass flow k:
m = NACdP,,
where
y = ratio of specific heats -1.1 for propane and butane
R = gas constant = 8.314 J/(mol. K)
W,= gas molecular weight, kilogram basis
0.044 for propane and 0.058 for butane
Thus
Check for choked flow at effective vent orifice. The mass flow rate at which flow becomes chokedisgiven by
where
Thus'
~ ~~
42
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
(b) Ifrir == mcthe flow is choked and a useful intermediate parameter is P,, the static pressure in the vent pipe,
P, =
- 3.67-$
dd
& N/m2
I I
1
K
' j' y -
= 2 + (2Tmal)Mj
2
m/S
1 uj = 3.024 Mj E1 d S
Use uj,djand Tjin the expressions for lower-explosive-limitancentration parameter and the jet-thrust-and-
wind-thrust parameter in the Brzustowski and Sommer correlations.
.. .
43
APPENDIX 2
4 FIGURES
Figure I
Geometry for colculoting view foctors for a verticalflame.
L = flame length (m)
R = flameradius(m)
X = horizontal distance from flame centre 16 target (m)
View factors for a range of values of L, R and X are shown
in Figure 5.
Figure 2
Geometry for colculoting view foctorsfor o tiltedjlome.
L = flame length (m)
R = flameradius(m)
X = horizontal distance from flame centre to target (m)
8 = angle of flame tilt (")
View factors for a range of values of L , R . X and 8 are
shown in Figures 6 to 13.
Figure 3
Geometry for colculoting view foctors if the torget is above
the base of theflome.
L+ = flame length above the plane of the target (m)
- - - - - - - - - -- L - = flame length below the plane of the target (m)
X
R = flame radius (m)
X = horizontal distance from flamecentre to target (in)
8 = angle of flame tilt (")
Two view factors are calculated:
++ represents the view factor for that part of the flame
above the target and is calculated from L', R . Xand
8 using Figures 6 to 9.
+- represents the view factor for that part of the flame
below the target and is calculated from L - , R, Xand
-8 using Figures 10 to 13.
The overall view factor (+) is the sum of @+ and @-.
Figure 4
Geometry for colculoting view foctors if the torget is below
the base of thepome.
The flame is extended until it reaches the horizontal plane
of the target.
LTol = total length of (extended) flame (m)
LHP = length of hypothetical flame added by extension
(m)
R = flameradius(m)
X = horizontal distance from centre of hypothetical
flame base to target (m)
8 = angle of flame tilt (")
Two view factors are calculated from Figures 6 to 9:
tpTolusing LTo',R , X and 8.
+"Pusing LH",.R,Xand 8.
The overall view factor (4) is obtained by subtracting +Hp
from
44
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
X /R
Figure 5
Maximum view factors for vertical cylinders.
45
APPENDIX 2
Figure 6
Maximum view facrors for tilted cylinders 6 = IS.
46
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
X/R
Figure 7
Maximum view factors for tilted cylinders 9 = 30"
47
APPENDIX 2
Figure 8
Maximum view factors for tilted cylinders 8 = 45.
48
CALCULATION O F THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
X/R
Figure 9
Maximum view factors for tilted cylinders 6 = W .
49
APPENDIX 2
x/R
Figure I0
Maximum view factorsfor tilted cylinders 6 = -1s.
50
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
51
APPENDIX 2
1.o
0.5
View
X/ R
Figure 12
Maximum view factorsfor tilted cylinders 0 = -45".
52
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
X/ff
Figure 13
Maximum view factors for tilted cylinders 8 = -60".
.--
53
APPENDIX 2
Re I a t ive humidi t y E D C B A
A = 10%
B = 30%
C = 50%
D = 70%
E = 100%
\ Distance
flame to
target
- 100
- 90
- 80
- 70
- 60
- 50
- 40
- 30
- 20
111
0.2
1U1I
0.3 0.4 0.5
Jl0
L
1.o
Atmospheric transmittance (T )
Figure 14
Atmospheric transmittance.
54
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
5.2 Example 1. Propane Pool Fire propan nng hn ko kh,chy vo vng trng to thnh h chy
Calculate the thermal radiation flux levels in the vicinity of a 20 metre diameter pool of burning propane (e.g. due
to ignition of a spillage in a rundown aredimpounding basin).
Ambient conditions are assumed to be:
Wind speed = 5 m/s'
Relative humidity = 30%
'Targets' of interest are at the following elevations:
Ground level (as base of fire)
10 metres above ground level
Thermal radiation flux levels (relative to distance from the fire) over the range 1.5 to 44 kW/m2(see Appendix 1)
are required.
Calculation
This is a liquid pool fire and the method described in 3.2 is followed.
From 3.2.1:
Pool diameter (D) is 20 metres (circular pool-diameter given).
From 3.2.2:
Calculate the liquid burning rate (V) (from equation (4))
V = V,[l - exp (-PO)]
V = V,[1 - exp (-0.67 x 20)]
V = 2:17 x 10-4 metreshec (for large pool)
From 3.2.3:
Calculate the flame length (L) from equation (5).
L = ~~D{M/[Q~(~D)~.~]}~.~~
M = Vel= 2.17 x 10-4 X 579
M = 0.1256 kg/sec sai n v, phi l (kg/m2*s)
L = 42 x 20{0.1256/[1.22(9.81 X 20)0.5]}0.61
L = 42 metres
From 3.2.4:
Calculate flame deviation (0) from equations (6) and (7).
0 = ms-l( u * ) 9 5
U * = u/(MgD/e,)"
U * = 5/(0.1256 x 9.81 x 20/2.30)1'3
U * = 2.27
55
APPENDIX 2
e = COS-' (0.664)
e = 48.40
-. -
For calculation purposes take 8 = 45".
From 3.2.5:
Calculate flame spillover ( D * )from equation (8).
D* = D X 1.5 (Fr)O.-
Fr = (U)'/(@)
Fr = (5)'/(9.81 x 20)
Fr = 0.1274
D* = 20 X 1.5(0.1274)0.w
D* = 26.0 metres
Flame spillover is therefore 6 metres.
For the purpose of view factor calculation the flame spillover is accounted for by assuming that the liquid pool is
displaced 6 metres in the direction of the wind, i.e. 6 metres nearer to the targets.
From the above calculations the sketch shown in Figure 15 can be constructed in order to simplify the
calculation of view factors.
X* (m) is measured from the edge of the displaced flame to the target.
X' (ID)is measured from the centre of the displaced flame to the target.
X (m) is the distance of the target from the edge of the original pool.
X = X* + 6(l)
(1) Flame spillover (B-Cin Figure 15) = 6 metres
The results are shown on Figure 16.
G ___t
Figure 15
Wind dirtetion Sketch of Erample 1 Fire.
A-B = liquid pool dimension (D = 20 m)
-)-- - _ _ _ - - - - -- - -10-mire= elestip,- - A-C = elongated flame dimension (D' = 26 m)
X-Y = axis of 'original' flame (t= 42 m)
G d level e = angle offlame tilt (48.40)
A Y BC E
For targets at I 0 metres elevation
E-F =-target vertical elevation (10 m)
C-F = flame length below target (t-= 15 m)
F-G = flame length above target (t+= 27 m)
C-E = distance correction toelevated target (11 m)
Notes: t- = (E-F)/sin (90- e) = 15.1 metres
L+ = L - L- = 42 - 15.1 = 26.9 metres
C-E = [(E-F)/sin (90- e) J sin 0 = 11.3 metres
56
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
!O
Thermal radiation
flux level (kW/m2)
I0
1
0
I I I I 1 I l l I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I 0
20 40 60 80 loo
Dlstonce to target from edge of pool (m)
Figure 16
Example 1 radiation levels.
57
APPENDIX 2
X* (m) is measured from the edge ofthe displaced flame (at 10 m elevation) to the target.
X' (m) is measured from the centre of the displaced flame (at 10 m elevation) to the target.
X (m) is the horizontal distance of the target from the edge of the original pool.
+
X = X* 6(1) lO(2) +
(1) Flame spillover (B-C in Figure 15) = 6 metres
(2) Correction to ground level (C-E in Figure 15) = 11 m
The results are shown in Figure 16.
t nht c 2 b , 1 b chy trn my xem nh ngun chy tc ng b
bn cnh
5.3 Example 2. Fire from Roof of Refrigerated Propane Storage Tank
Calculate the thermal radiation flux levels in the vicinity of a refrigerated propane storage tank burning from the
roof. Assume the worst case condition in which the whole area of the roof has been destroyed (i.e. maximum fire
diameter).
Ambient conditions are assumed to be:
Wind speed = 4 mls'
Relative humidity = 30%
Tank dimensions are taken as:
Shell height = 25 m
Diameter = 36 m
'Targets' of interest are:
(a) Adjacent identical storage tanks (protected by water sprays) on which a maximum thermal radiation flux
level of 32 kWlm2is permitted. The minimum spacing between tanks and representative radiation levels on
the shell and roof (for water spray rate estimates) are to be calculated.
(b) The (remote area) plant boundary at which a thermal radiation level of 13 kW/m2 (at ground level) is
allowable. The minimum distance from tank to boundary is required.
The storage tank is assumed to be of a type which will not 'burn down', i.e. the base of the visible flame will remain
at an elevation of 25 metres above grade.
Calculation
This is a liquid pool fire and the method used in Example 1 is followed.
For this case the calculations are summarized except where the method differs from Example 1.
Equivalent pool diameter ( D ) = 36 metres
Liquid burning rate (V) = 2.17 X 10-4 metres/s
Flame length (L) = 63 metres
Flame deviation (e) = 35"
Flame spillover (calculated) = 8 metres
58
CALCULATION OF T H E R M A L RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
, E x P S Figure 17
Sketch of Example 2 Fire.
A-B = liquid pool dimension (D = 36 m)
A-C = elongated flame dimension (D* = 44 m)
X-Y = axis of 'original' flame (L= 63 m) (cho pool fire dk 20m)
0 = angle of flame tilt (35O)
For targets at ground level
B-H = vertical distance below flame base (25 m)
Y-2 = 'hypothetical' flame length (LHm= 30.5 m)
X-z = 'total' flame length (LT"= 93.5 m)
J-K = distance correction to ground level target (17.5 m)
For targets at 33 metres elevation
G Z F J H K M-N = target vertical elevation (8 m)
C-M = flame length below target (L-= 9.8 m)
M S = flame length above target (L' = 53.2 m)
C-N = distance correction to elevated target (5.6 m)
The sketch in Figure 17 illustrates the conditions. The flame is 'extended' to ground level for the purpose of
calculating view factors for ground level targets.
The flame spillover effect is shown as calculated above, but a lower spillover would be expected for this type
of elevated fire.
For this calculation the maximum height of the domed roof on the adjacent rank is taken as 33 metres.
X' X'IR 4) T I X
5 1.3 0.67 0.92 30.8 13
9 1.5 0.59 0.89 26.3 17
18 2.0 0.45 0.84 18.9 26
27 2.5 0.35 0.81 14.2 35
36 3.0 0.27 0.79 10.7 44 X*:tnh khong cch t cao
45 3.5 0.22 0.77 8.5 53 25 m ngn la ti tank cg
cao 25m)
X* (m) is measured from the edge of the displaced flame to the target (both at 25 m elevation).
X' (m) is measured from the centre of the displaced flame to the target (both at 25 m elevation).
X (m) is the horizontal distance of the target from the edge of the tank
X = X* + 8(1)
(1) Flame spillover (B-C in Figure 17) = 8 metres
These results are plotted on Figure 18.
59
APPENDIX 2
80 55 58
13 30 43
32 12 18
Thermal radiation
flux level. (kW/m2
-
\\\Yank 33 metres
elevation
roof)
elevation
(tank shell)
Ground
level / - -
I I I I I I I I l l I I I I 1 I
0 20 40 60 80 100
Figure 18
Example 2 radiation levelr.
CALCULATION OF THERMAL RADIATION FLUX LEVELS
Thermal radiation flux levels are calculated as for the 25 metre elevation case, for targets between 5 metres
and 45 metres from the edge of the displaced flame at 33 metres elevation (Point M in Figure 17):
X* X'IR d r I X
5 1.3 0.67 0.92 30.8 19
9 1.5 0.59 0.89 26.3 23
18 2.0 0.44 0.84 18.5 32
27 2.5 0.34 0.81 13.8 41
36 3.0 0.255 0.79 10.1 50
45 3.5 0.20 0.77 ,7.7 59
X* (m) is measured from the edge of the displaced flame (at 33 m elevation) to the target.
X' (m) is measured from the centre of the displaced flame (at 33 m elevation) to the target.
X (rn) is the horizontal distance of the target from the edge of the tank.
X = X * + 8(1) + 6(2)
(1) Flame spillover (B-C in Figure 17) = 8 metres
(2)Correction for elevation (C-Hin Figure 17) = 6 metres C-N mi chnh xc
These results are plotted on Figure 18.
X * (m) is measured from the edge of the displaced flame (extended to ground level) to the target.
X' (m) is measured from the centre of the displaced flame (extended to ground level) to the target.
X (m) is the horizontal.distance of the target from the edge of the tank.
X = X* + 8(1) - 17(2)
(1) Flame spillover (B-C in Figure 17) = 8 metres
(2) Correction for 'extended' flame (J-K in Figure 17) = 17 metres
These results are plotted on Figure 18.
5.4 Example 3. Fire from Roof of Refrigerated Propane StorageTank Burning Down to Pool Fire at Ground Level
In this example all conditions are the same as in Example 2 except that the storage tank is assumed to be of a type
which will 'bum down', i.e. the fire will start at a visible flame elevation of 25 metres and will finish as a 36 metre
diameter LPG pool fire at ground level.
The initial thermal radiation levels will be as calculated for Example 2. Data for the same 'targets' and
conditions are required for the latter stages of the fire at ground level.
Calculation .- .-
All initial calculations are as for Example 2. A sketch illustrating the latter stages of the fire with the tank burned
down to ground level is shown in Figure 19.
61
APPENDIX 2
E - X P S mure 19
Sketch of Example 3 Fire.
A-B = liquid pool dimension (D = 36 m)
A-C = elongated flame dimension (D. = 44 m)
X-Y = axis of 'original' flame (L= 63 m) (cho b c k 20m)
6 = angle of flame tilt (35")
For targits at 25 metres elevation
M-N = target vertical elevation (25 m)
C-M = flame length below `` target (L-= 30.5 m)
A Y 8 C NH M S = flame length above target (L+= 32.5 m)
C-N = distance correction to elevated target (17.5 m)
For targets at 33 metres elevation
F-H = target vertical elevatioo (33 m)
C-F = flame length below target (L-= 40.2 m)
F S = flame length above target (L' = 22.8 m)
C-H = distancecorrection to elevated target (23.1 m)
X* (m) is measured from the edge of the displaced flame (at 25 m elevation) to the target.
X' (m) is measured from the centre of the displaced flame (at 25 m elevation) to the target.
X (m) is the horizontal distance of the target from the edge of the tank.
X = X' + 8(1) + 17(2)
(1) Flame spillover (E-F in Figure 19) = 8 m
(2) Correction for elevation ( B Ein Figure 19) = 17 m
These results are shown on Figure U).
The 25 metre elevation level also represents the edge of an adjacent tank roof. The thermal radiation flux
levels differ from those calculated above for the rank shell because the roof will receive only minimal radiation
from that part of the flame below 25 metres elevation. This is partly due to the shielding of parts of the roof by the
tank shell, but also because those areas of the roof which are 'visible' to the flame are at a very unfavourable angle
to receive and absorb thermal radiation. Therefore, for the roof (25 m elevation) only the view factor for the flame
length above the target is applied.
The calculation for the roof at 25 metres elevation is shown below and also plotted on Figure 20:
X'
~
X'IR @ T I x
5 1.3 0.67 0.92 30.8 30 I
25 metres
elevation \
\x+\
Tank
40
30
20
10
1 I I I I I I I I I D
0 20 40 60 80 100
Distance to target from tank shell (m)
Figure 20
Example 3 radiation levek.
. ..
63
APPENDIX 2
X' (m)is measured from the edge of the displaced flame (at 33 m elevation) to the target.
X' (m) is measured from the centre of the displaced flame (at 33 m elevation) to the target.
X (m) is the horizontal distance of the target from the edge of the tank.
X = X* + 8(1) + 23(2)
(1) Flame spillover (B-C in Figure 19) = 8 metres
(2) Correction for elevation (C-H in Figure 19) = 23 metres
These results are plotted on Figure 20.
Calculationsfor targets at ground level
The calculation is exactly th'e same as that for a target at 25 metres elevation in Example 2, i.e. flame base and
target at the same elevation.
The figures are plotted on Figure 20, together with the additional data generated below to extend the range
of results:
X' X'IR @ r I X
54 4.0 0.175 0.76 6.7 63
72 5.0 0.12 0.74 4.5 81
90 6.0 0.08 0.72 2.88 99
108 7.0 0.06 0.71 2.13 117
126 8.0 0.045 0.70 1.58 135
144 9.0 0.037 0.69 1-28 153
64
. .
Appendix 3
Leak sources from LPG storage systems should for design purposes be confined to certain well-defined situations
provided:
(a) the finished design and operating procedures employed are based on the results of systematic analysis of the
system taking into account failure modes and the likelihood of their occurring and
(b) the system is designed, constructed and maintained in conformity with an acceptable code.
In the case of pressure storage such situations are considered to be limited to possible leakage from vessel
flange and piping gaskets, pump seals and to the failure of small bore connections.
In the case of refrigerated systems leaks are similarly limited to flange gaskets and small bore connections
but, additionally, experience has indicated the possibility of limited cracks occumng in plate material.
Tables are given below which, based on simple flow formulae, illustrate the order of magnitude of LPG
releases to be expected from typical credible release sources under the postulated storage conditions. These
formulae are typical of a number of equations which could be used depending on choice, flow regime, release
conditions anticipated at the orifice, storage conditions, etc. Release rates are given for both butane and propane
and the cdculations assume the physical properties of the pure materials rather than those of the various
commercial grades manufactured.
This appendix does not in any way attempt to indicate the risk of credible failures happening, which is an
important part of the systematic evaluation of the design and operating procedures for the plant, but confines
itself to indicating the type of leak source and the leakage rate considered to be typical for that source.
For simplicity no account has been taken in the examples given of the installation of emergency valves, e.g.
excess flow valves, for limiting leakage rates and duration.
1 PRESSURE STORAGE
The typical simple equation used for pressure storage (results shown in Tables 1and 2) is for small 'hole' sizes and
assumes a homogeneous equilibrium two-phase flashing liquid release from the orifice. This contrasts with a
single-phase spray release which may occur under certain circumstances. It also contrasts with the formula used
for refrigerated LPG releases (see 2) in which non-flashing 100% liquid release is assumed.
Thus Tables 1and 2 are based on the formula
APPENDIX 3
where
W = releasrate (kgls)
A = area of release hole (m)
C,,= coefficiexit of discharge, assumed here to be 1.0
Pi = initial pressure (Nlm, Pascals)
P, = critical pressure (Nlm) (assumed here to be 0.55 Pi)
d,,, = mean density of vapourhiquid mixture (kg/m3)
-
MJd, + (1 - M,)ldp
where
d, = density of vapour (kg/m3)
dp = density of liquid (kg/m3)
M, = (Ti -I r e ) c
where
Ti = initial temperature (K)
T, = equilibrium temperature corresponding to P,(K)
L = latent heat of vaporization ( k J k g )
C = heat capacity of liquid (kJkg per degree centigrade)
Table I
Release resulting from pipejlange gazketfailure.
Gasket 1.5 mm (1116in) thick
Failure between adjacent bolt holes
Flange sizes based on ANSI 300 lb flange rating
Butane stored at 1.5 barg (2.5 x 16 Pascals)
Propane stored at 7 barg (8 x 1 6 Pascals)
~~
Pipe diameter Area of release hole Butane release rate Propane release rate
(mm (in)) (m x U P) (kgls, 1.5barg) (kgls, 7bag)
50 (2) 75 0.23 0.53
100 (4) 118 0.35 0.81
150 (6) 106 0.35 0.70
200 (8) 129 0.39 0.89
300 (12) 133 0.40 0.93
Table 2
Release resulting from small bore connectionfailure.
Butane stored at 1.5 barg (2.5 x 1 6 Pascals)
Propane stored at 7 barg (8 x 1 6 Pascals)
Pipe diameter Area ofrelease hole Butane release rate Propane release rate
(mm (in) 1 (m2x 10+) (kgls, 1.5 barg) (kgls, 7barg)
285 0.88 1.88
2028 6.25 13.75
Note (a): The effect offriction (e.g. in long pipes) which can considerably reduce release rates
is not taken into account.
Note (b): Full bore flow is assumed, i.e. no account is taken of emergency valve operation, or
other flow limiters.
A coefficient of discharge of 1.0has been used but other lower values, in some cases as low as 0.6. may be appropriate depending upon the
flow regime and the orifice configuration. etc.
66
LEAK SOURCES AND TYPICAL LEAK RATES FROM LPG STORAGE SYSTEMS
Note I : All the release rates quoted in Tables 3,4 and 5 have been determined for a static system.(dng cho h thng tnh)
Note 2: The densities of refrigerated butane and propane are so close that the release rates will be substantially
the same for both, and also for mixtures of them.
(mt butan v propan tng ng nhau lc ng lnh)
Table 3
Release resultingfrom p i p e j h g e gasket failure.
Gasket 1.5 m m (1116 in) thick
Failure between adjacent bolt holes
Flange sizes based on ANSI 300 Ib flange rating
~~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
Note (c): The height of product chosen, i.e. 20 m and 30 m. are typical of a large tank
approximately two-thirds full and full respectively.
Table 4
Releare resulting from funksmall bore connectionfailure.
67
\
APPENDIX 3
Table 5
Releasefrom tank materialfailure-split 20 cm in length.
68
Appendix 4
VAPOUR DISPERSION
A number of theoretical mathematical models have been derived for predicting vapour dispersion from LPG
spillages. Work on these models and the empirical correlations which take account of various physical processes
which influence vapour dispersion is known to be continuing.
To date no single model is universally acceptable and many companies have their own in-house approaches
which they use on a worldwide basis.
A paper published in the Journal of Hazardous MateriaLs, 6 (1982), entitled Heavy gas dispersion models,
by D . R. Blackmore, M. N. Herman and J. L. Woodward, contains a review of the following models:
Ground level releases Jet release
Zephyr Astleford et al.
Transloc Bloom
Sigmet-N Cox et al.
Mariah Ooms et al.
Disco
Hegadas 11
Cox and Carpenter
Eidvik
Fay
Flothman and Nikodem
Denz
Germeles and Drake
Picknett
Van Buijtenan
Van Ulden
69
Appendix 5
EXAMPLE
Assume the maximum heat flux received = 32 kW/m2
The spray water system does not involve water recirculation.
'
Ambient water temperature max = 20 "C
Required maximum target surface temperature = 100C
As a factor of safety assume that only 25% of the latent heat of evaporation is taken into account.
It is required to determine the necessary water application rate.
70
COOLING WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR REFRIGERATED STORAGE TANKS
Sohtion
1 kg of water absorbs as sensible heat (20"C to 100"C) = 336 kJ
1 kg of water absorbs in evaporating 2,257kJ
2 257 = 564 kJ is used.
Therefore for calculation purposes assume
4
Thus heat absorbed by 1 kg of water = 336 + 564
=mkJ
Radiant heat flux to be absorbed = 32 kW/m2
= 32 kJ/(s/m')
32
Therefore required water application rate = -
900
= 0.036 kgl(s/m2)
This is equivalent to 2.16 V(min/m') of surface area to be protected.
Similar calculations can be carried out for other portions of the tank receiving lower flux levels.
71
Appendix 6
Butane
Propane
In the above Columns A and B recommend practical limits to cater for variations in gas composition, etc.
Column A-represents the maximum allowable concentration ofjibminable gas in the gadinert mixture to enable
safe subsequent introduction of replacement air.
Column B-represents the maximum allowable concentration of oxygen in the aidinert mixture to enable safe
introductiodreplacement by flammable gas.
Note: The abovefigures do not represent safe levels at which entry is permissible.
72
Appendix 7
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
For the purpose of this Code the following interpretations apply irrespective of any other meaning the words may
have in other connections. Where used in the Code, these terms are printed in ifalics.
Above-ground storage: Storage of which no part, other than foundations, is below ground level or covered by
earth or similar materials.
Below-groundhuried storage: Storage of which no part, other than connections, is above ground level.
Blank flange: A solid flange which can be bolted to a flanged connection on pipes or equipment to block off flow
from it. The flanges should be of the same rating.
Bleed valve: A small vent valve, usually immediately downstream of a block valve, which can be opened to
ascertain whether there is pressure on the down side of the block valve when closed.
Blind: (See Blankflange and Slip blind, terms which are preferable as they are unambiguous.)
Block valve: A valve which controls the passage of a liquid through a pipe with the intention that it permits either
full flow or no flow.
Bonding: Provision of a low resistance electrical conductor between sections of plant, equipment or structures.
Breathing apparatus: A device which ensures that the wearer has a continuously available supply of uncontami-
nated air through a face mask, helmet o r mouthpiece.
Bund, bunding, bunded area, bunded enclosure: An enclosure bounded by a wall or by natural or constructed
ground contours and designed to confine a spillage of product.
Bund wall: A wall of appropriate height and size, constructed of suitable material and designed to confine a
spillage of product.
Capacity: The interval volume of the container.
Container: A general term used to denote a vessel or rank for holding LPG whether for bulk storage, transport or
portable use.
Competent person: A person who has the necessary ability in the particular process, trade, plant or equipment to
which the text refers to render him capable of the work involved and who has been duly authorized to
undertake the work.
-
Cryogenic: Relating to low temperatures, e.g. below 100"C.
Earthing: The provision of a safe path of electrical current to ground, in order to protect structures, plant and
equipment from the effects of stray electrical currents and electrostatic discharge.
Fire safe: A term used to denote a defined standard of resistance to fire exposure, e.g. to standards laid down in
BS 5146.
Fireproofed: Provided with a defined standard of protection against fire exposure, e.g. BS 476 Part 8.
Fire resistant: The ability to control the surface spread of flame to a specified rate under laid down conditions,
e.g. BS 476.
Flammable (synonymouswith Inflammable): Refers to any substance, solid, liquid, gas or vapour, which is easily
- ignited. The addition Qf the prefix 'non' indicates thatthe substance is not readily ignited but does not
necessarily indicate that it is noncombustible.
Fully in-ground: Totally below ground level.
'73
APPENDIX 7
Fully refrigerated: Cooled to a temperature at which its vapour pressure is at or below atmospheric pressure.
Gas-free:A tank, vessel, container, pipeline or area is considered to be gas-free when the concentration of
-. fimmuble gases is within the safe prescribed limits.%e term gas-free does not imply absence of toxic gases
or sufficiencyof oxygen for tank or vessel entry,
Hazardous area: An area in which there exists or may exist an atmosphere containingflarnrnable gas or vapour in
a concentration capable of ignition. (The term refers exclusively to hazards arising from ignition.)
Hot work: This includes welding or the use of any flame or electric arc or the use of any equipment likely to cause
heat, flame or spark. It also includes caulking, chipping, drilling, riveting and any other heat producing
operation, unless it is carried out in such a way as to keep the temperature of the tools and work below 100C.
Impounding basin: (As for bund, bunding, bunded area, bunded enclosure.)
Mounded storagelvessel: Storage above or partly in the ground which, excluding connections, is completely
covered by earth, sand or other suitable material.
Naked Ughts/naked flames: Include all uncodined flames, fires, exposed incandescent material, lamps of an
unapproved pattern, electric welding arcs and portable hand or power operated equipment liable to cause
incendiary sparks.
Non-credible: Having such a low frequency of occurrence as to justify its exclusion from consideration for all
practical purposes.
Partially refrigerated: Cooled to a temperature between ambient and the materials boiling point such that its
vapour pressure is reduced below that related to its level at ambient temperatures.
Partly in-ground: Refers to storage which is partly below ground and partly above ground.
Permit: See Work permit.
Permit to work system: A formal system for controlling work which is potentially hazardous which specifies
precise conditions for the work, including its limitation and duration and which can only be authorized by
specified levels of authority.
Pressure storage: Storage of or for LPG at its vapour pressure at ambient temperatures.
Pressure vessel: A container designed for the storage or transport of LPG at ambient temperatures. built to a
recognized Code such as BS 5500 or ASME Section VIII.
Refrigerated LPG: LPG which is cooled to a temperature at which its vapour pressure is substantially at
atmospheric pressure.
Refrigerated product: (As for refrigerated LPG.)
Refrigerated storage: Storage for product which is at such a temperature that its vapour pressure is substantially
at atmospheric pressure.
Semi-refrigerated: (As for Partidy refrigerated.)
Slip blind: A circular flat plate with a handle which can be bolted between two flanges to block off flow. The handle
should extend outside the flanges. The plate should be thick enough to withstand the anticipated pressure
which need not be the flange rating pressure.
Source of ignition: Naked lights, fires, certain electrical equipment, hot surfaces above ignition temperature or a
spark or flame produced by any other means.
Spectacle blind: A solid circular plate connected to a circular plate with a hole in it by a straight handle. The plates
are designed to be bolted between flanges on piping and equipment. The first will block off flow and the
second will pass normal flow. The plate should be thick enough to withstand the anticipated pressure which
need not be the flange rating pressure. The advantage of this device is that no additional mechanical stress is
applied to the equipment when it is changed between the open and closed position.
Storage vessel: A container for the bulk storage of LPG at ambient temperatures.
Tank: A container for the bulk storage or transport of liquid and specifically for refrigerated LPG as distinct from
the pressurized product.
Thermally protected: Provided with cooling water facilitiesor other effective means, e.g. insulation, designed to
limit the effect of radiation from fire.
Vessel: A container for the bulk storage or transport of LPG at ambient temperatures.
Work permit: A document issued by an authorized person to permit work to be carried out safely in a defined
area under specific conditions.
74
Appendix 8
The following is intended to assist those responsible in producing their own local workpennit procedures, which
are essential to the safe management of an LPG plant. It must be stressed that the details will depend on the sue,
layout and scope of operations in the plant as well as its internal organization, and they must therefore becarefully
worked out at a local level.
(A) 'GENERAL
No construction, repair, maintenance work, dismantling or modification to facilities should be carried out
anywhere inside an LPG plant without the authority of the manager or his authorized representative.
In all cases except for work of a routine and non-hazardous nature, this permission should be given in the
written form of a workpermit.
( 1 ) Work Pennif
The work permit should clearly specify
(a) the particular item of plant equipment to be worked upon,
(b) the work to be permitted and
(c) all the conditions that are to be observed to enable the work to be carried out without hazard; these conditions
should include all the special precautions to be taken, such as isolation, gas testing, protective clothing and
appliances, breathing apparatus, safety, fire-fighting equipment.
To enable this to be done effectively, the layout of the work permit form should include a comprehensive
checklist section, giving the issuer a methodical procedure by which to consider and stipulate all the necessary
conditions to be followed, and the user of the permit a similar check-off opportunity. (The dual nature of this
check-off procedure by both the parties involved is particularly emphasized.)
An integral part of the work permit system of control is that it is used in conjunction with gas test and other
certificates that are additionally required to cover specific precautions listed on the work permit.
75
APPENDIX 8
Gas testing should only be permitted to be carried out by authorized persons who have received training in
the use and care. of gas detectors and who are knowledgeable as to their limitgions.
entry into any confined space such as a tank or vessel for cleaning out or any other purpose;
work which involves hot work, naked lights or other sources of ignition, or requires the use of mobile
internal combustion engines, air compressors or portable electric lights with trailing leads;
work in the open or in buildings, in or near a huzurdous area, which have not been designated as in (2)
above;
work in, near, or on tanks, vessels, pipelines, equipment or other facilities or in pits, culverts, drains,
etc.;
excavations;
work on electrical feeders, distributors or equipment.
(a) Emptying the liquid LPG, depressurizing and disconnecting equipment, pipelines, pressure vessels,
tanks, etc., as necessary.
(b) Isolation
Isolation may be by locking isolation valves of the double block and bleed type, by fitting blankflanges
or blinds, or by swinging spectacle blinh to the closed position. The use of single valves or cocks alone,
as a means of isolation for allowing work on equipment, is acceptable only for short periods during which
blankflanges or blinds are being fitted or spectacle blinds are being swung. Increased security may be
achieved by locking these single isolation valves. Double block and bleed systems are preferred to single
valves wherever practicable.
For entry into confined spaces, all possible sources of harmful gases and liquids must be isolated by
the use of slip blinds, spectacle blinds or blankflanges. A register of isolation fitting and removal should
be maintained so as to prevent any of these items being overlooked.
The above guidelines cannot cover all special conditions that may arise. Where other circumstances require
further special conditions these should also be entered upon the work pennit in the extra space provided.
(H) TYPICALFORMS
The following forms are typical of those required to assist safe working practices in an LPG plant.
It must be stressed that any forms used must be designed to suit local geographical and organizational
circumstances, and should be backed up by formal written procedures. These examples should therefore be used
for guidance but should not be regarded as standard.
Specimen form 1 Hot Work Permit
Specimen form 2 Entry Permit
Specimen form 3 Permit to Work on or near Electrical Equipment
-
Specimen form 4 General Work Permit
Specimen form 5 Permit for Line Disconnecting and Vessel Opening
78
SPECIMEN FORM 1
HOT WORK PERMIT
-
.SI..it .ling Tiiiic:
Ihte:
G Finishing Time: bate:
E
N IM;iititenance/<:oiit~tctiirPersonnel:
E
R 1.cw;ition-specify precisely:
A
L 1)escription of Work:
-
Iiiitiiil ;ill iterns cciIiipletet1:
I
I Test. gas frc:-:ire;i. sewers. etc.
? t i i i s equipment k e n purged?
7
.+re surrounding itreits safe?
(e.g. sewers. ripen vessels)
Special (:oiitliticins:
79
SPECIMEN FORM 2
ENTRY PERMIT
Serial No.:
Request
Permit required (date) (time)
Description of work
Safety Check
Yes No If NtrWhyl
--I
~~~
I
5. Is all electrical equipment locked
out of service?
80
SPECIMEN FORM 3
PERMIT To WORK ON OR NEAR
ELECTRICAL EQUIPM.ENT
This permit must be issued to the person in charge of the work and retained b y
him until the work is completed or stopped. T h e equipment must not be made
alive again until this permit is surrendered to an authorized person and cancelled
by him.
This permit is hereby cancelled. T h e person cancelling need not necessarily be the
person who issued the permit, provided always that he is authorized todoso and that
he is fully aware of the circumstances and that before making the equipment 'alive'
again ensures that a h e m p o r a r y earthing and danger notices have been removed.
81
SPECIMEN FORM 4
GENERAL WORK PERMIT
1. Is equipment live?
Distribution:
Original: Maintenance Foreman
Copy: Operating Supervisor
Copy: JobSite '
RENEWAL
Permit Renewed Time: .................................... Date ...;.............................
Authorizing Signatory: ...........................................................................
Remarks: .............................................................................................
............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
~~ ~
COMPLETION: This is to certify that the above work is complete, all tools and
gear have been removed, the work area has been cleared and applicable locks and
tags have been removed.
Signed: ................................................................................................
Time :................................... .Date: ......................................................
82
SPECIMEN FORM 5
PERMIT FOR LINE DISCONNECTING
AND VESSEL OPENING
Serial No.:
(Please PRINT Clearly)
Request
Description of work
~ ~~ ~
Safety Check
r-- Question
I
83
Appendix 9
84
CODES OF PRACTICE
85
APPENDIX 9
INSTITUTE OF PETROLEUM (IP)
Model codes of safe practice in the petroleum industry
Part 1 Electrical
Part 6 Petroleum pipelines
Part 12 Inspection of pressure vessels
Part 13 Inspection of pressure piping systems
Part 14 Inspection and testing of protective instrumentation systems
Part 15 Area Classification (Pending)
86
Appendix 10
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
87
INDEX
References are to section and clause numbers. Def. indicates that a definition of the term is in Appendix 7.
For example 'Atmospheric pressure 1.2.3,1.3.1,1.3.3, etc.' implies references to clauses 1.2.3, 1.3.1, 1.3.3. etc.
88
INDEX
Hazards of LPG 1.3 Odorization 1.4 Semi-refrigerated, Def.,
Hoses 2.4.14, 2.4.15,2.6.5.4, 2.7.3.1, Oxygen 2.2.6,2.10.5.2,2.10.5.3, Shutoff valves 2.3.7.2.4.6. 2.6.1.5,
2.7.3.3 3.10.4.4.3.11.4.2, 3.11.6.6.3.11.7.3 2.6.5.3
Hot work, Def., App. 8 ! Sidings (rail) 2.7.1.2.2.7-3.5.2.7.4.2
Hydrants 2.9.6.3,2.9.6.6. 2.9.6.8, Partially refrigerated, Def., 2.3.2.2, Single containment 3.2.1.2
2.9.7 3.1.2.2 Slip blind, Def., App. 8
Hydrate 1.5,2.3.13,2.4.11.2,3.10.2 Partly in-ground, Def., 3.1.1.3.2.1.1, Source of ignition, Def., App. 8
3.7.1.2 Spacir\g/location/layout .
Ice/icing2.3.13,2.4.11,3.2.1.2, Permit to work systems, Def.. pressure storage 2.2.1, 2.2.2.
3.5.4.13.3.10.2 2.10.5.1.2.11.1,3.9.1, 3.10.3. 2.5.6.3,2.9.3.2, App. 1
Impounding basin, Def., 2.2.2.3, 3.11.1,App. 8 refrigerated storage 3.3.3.4, 3.8.3.1,
3.4.1.2,3.4.2.1, 3.4.3,3.8.3.4 Philosophy 3.1.3.1.3.2.3.9.2 APP- 1
Inertgas2.10.5.3,3.10.4,3.10.5.1, Piping loadinglunloading 2.2.2.1,2.7.1,
3.11.2,3.11.3,3.11.4,3.11.5.1, bolting 2.4.8 APP- 1
3.11.6 designlconstruction 2.4.1. 2.4.3, Spectacle blind, Def., App. 8
Inspectiodcheckingltesting 2.3.1.1. 2.4.4,3.6.1 Spillageheakage
2.3.17.2.4.13.2.4.14.3, 2.4.14.4, flangeslfittinjp 2.4.1.2.4.7 pressure storage 2.2.1, 2.2.2, 2.2.3,
2.9.7,.2.11,3.9 inspections 3.9.6.7 2.2.7,2.7.2,2.9.9,2.10.4
Insulation2.3.12.2.4.11, 3.2.1.2. installatiodflexibility 2.4.9, 3.6.3 refrigerated storage 3.2.4,3.2.5.2,
3.3.3,3.5.4.9,3.5.5.1, 3.6.3.2 insulation 2.4.11 3.3.1.3.3.2, 3.3.3,3.4.1,3.4.2.2,
materials 2.4.2,3.6.2 3.4.3.4,3.4.3.5, 3.5.1.6, App. 3
Kerbs 2.2.3.2. 2.7.1.1 valves 2.4.6 Sprayldeluge systems 2.9.6.2.9.7,
Pressure storage, Def., 3.8.3.4,3.8.3.6, 3.8.3.8
LayoutAocatiodspacing design 2.3 Storage
pressure storage 2.2.1, 2.2.2
~ 2.2.7, fire protection 2.9,App. 5 pressure, Chapter 2
2.9.3.2, App. 1 inspections 2.11 refrigerated, Chapter 3
refrigerated storage 3.3.3,3.8.3.1, locatiodspacingnayout 2.2, App. 1 Surges 2.3.9.2. 2.6.5.2
APP. 1 operation 2.10
loadinglunloading2.2.2.1. App. 1 Properties of LPG 1.2 Testingkheckinglinspections2.3.1.1,
Leakageheakdspillage Purging 2.10.5,3.11.3,3.11.5, App. 6 2.3.17,2.4.13.2.4.14.4. 2.9.7,
pressure storage 2.2.1, 2.2.2. 2.2.3, Pumps 2.6.1, 2.6.4 2.11,3.9
2.2.7,2.7.2.2.9.9,2.10.4 Thermal pressure relief 2.4.10,3.6.4
refrigerated storage 3.2.4,3.2.5.2, Radiation flux 2.2.2.1,2.2.2.3, Training 2.10.2,3.12.1
3.3:1,3.3.2.3.3.3.3.4.1. 3.4.2.2. 3.2.5.3.3.3.1, App. 1, App. 2 Transfer operations 2.10.7, 3.12.4
3.4.3.4,3.4.3.5,3.5.1.6. App. 3 Rail tank wagons 2.7.1.2.2.7.3. Unloadinglloading 2.2.2.2, 2.7, 2.9.2
Lighting 2.10.9 2.7.4.2, 2.10.7.1.2.10.7.6
Lightning 2.8.2 Refrigerated storage, Def., Vacuum 2.3.2.4,3.5.4. 3.9.3, 3.9.6
Loadinglunloading2.2.2.2. 2.7. design 3.5 Vacuum relief valves 3.9.6
2.9.2 fire protection 3.8, App. 5 Vapour cloud 2.10.4, 3.2.5.1.3.3.3
initial filling 3.10 Vapour pressure 1.2.3.2.3.2
Meters 2.6.3,2.6.4 inspections 3.9 Vapour travel 2.2.2.2, 3.3.3. App. 4
Methanol 1.5 locatiodspacing 3.3, App. 1 Ventinglvent pipes 2.3.6, 3.5.4,
Monitors 2.9.6.3 operation 3.12 3.10.4,3.10.5,3.10.6,3.11.5
Mounded storage, Def., 2.1.1, 2.2.2, taking out of service 3.11
2.2.8,2.3.2.3,2.3.4.4,2.3.6.4. Relief valves Warning signs 2.9.10
2.3.14,2.5.4,2.9.3.4 pressure storage 2.2.2.8. 2.3.6. Weldinglwelded 2.4.2.4,2.4.4.2,
2.3.7.1. 2.3.8 2.4.5,2.5.6.2,3.2.4,3.5.3.2
Naked lightdflames. Def., 2.9.10 refrigerated storage 3.5.4, 3.9.6.1 Work permits (systems), Def.,
Nodular iron 2.4.2.2,2.4.6.4 Road vehicles (bulk) 2.7.1.1. 2.10.5.1.2.11.1,3.9.1,3.10.3,
Non-credible, Def., 3.2.1.2, 3.2.1.3 2.7.3.2.10.7.1. 2.10.7.6 3.11.1, App. 8
89