Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
permanently in July 1954 and the water level four years and increased the size of the trees.
in the ditch was lowered to seven and one- 3. The feeder-root concentration in the
half feet. The water table at the 220 foot deep-rooting zone (30-70") was greater than
position was lowered from 40 inches (June in the 0-10 inch zone and considerably higher
1954) to 66 inches as measured in September than is usual for trees growing on deep, well
1954. Root distribution will be studied in drained sands.
July 1955 to note any changes that may occur 4. When root distribution was above 13
with a lower water table. grams (expressed as dried feeder roots in a
sq. ft. column) a visible increase in tree size
Summary could be noted.
1. Stabilizing the water table at a lower
level increased the total rooting area and the LITERATURE CITED
newly developed roots survived without peri
1. Ford, Harry W. 1953. The effect of spreading
odic destruction. decline on the root distribution of citrus. Proc. Fla.
State Hort. Soc. 65: 47-50.
2. Lowering the water table from 30 to 70
2. Ford, Harry W. 1954. Unpublished data, Fla.
inches doubled the quantity of feeder roots in Citrus Exp. Sta.
- Below 60 ppm -
lew
60 to 90 ppm-
Medium
Above 90 ppm-
High
the solutions in such a way as to not disturb all locations was found to be 66.6 ppm. (Table
the silica residue. Iron determinations were 1). Fifty of the 123 groves, or 40.7 percent,
made using the ortho-phenanthroline proce had a leaf-iron content below 60 pprn. (Table
dure. 3). This suggests that a much larger number
Results of groves than was originally thought may
In order to evaluate the data obtained from have iron deficiency. In many of these in
this survey, it was necessary to establish cer stances, iron chlorosis patterns may appear
tain leaf iron standards. Preliminary studies only at certain times of the year, such as dur
at the Citrus Experiment Station had estab ing growth flush periods. However, even in
lished that citrus leaves containing below 60 these cases the lack of sufficient iron could be
ppm. of iron may be chlorotic on trees growing one of the limiting factors in the amount of
on acid soil. On this basis the survey data was growth produced.
divided into three categories; below 60 ppm. Trees containing the highest amount of iron
of iron was considered as being low, between were found in the West Coast, Ridge and
60 and 90 ppm. of iron as medium, and any Gainesville districts, while trees from the In
values above 90 ppm. iron were classified as dian River and Brooksville districts contained
high. A map showing the locations of the the least (Table 1). The Ridge district trees
various groves and their relative leaf iron con contained on the average 21.5 ppm. more iron
tent (low, medium or high) is presented as than those from the Indian River district The
Fig. 1, and the data for iron analysis are in low values for trees in the Indian River and
Tables 1, 2 and 3. Upper East Coast areas was anticipated be
When all the information was evaluated, cause of the calcareous nature of the soils on
the mean leaf-iron content for all varieties in which the trees grow. In general, iron is not
readily taken up by trees growing on calcare
Table 1 ous soils. There are, however, some indica
Efftct of Location and Rootatock on Average
tions from other work which is being done at
leaf Iron Content of Citrus the Citrus Experiment Station that citrus trees
growing on these soils may have a lower iron
requirement than trees growing on acid soils.
Number
Average
Iron
Separation of the data according to root-
of Content stocks (Table 1) shows that on the average,
Groves
trees on rough lemon rootstocks tended to
All varieties in all locations t 123 1D~ have higher leaf iron values than trees on sour
All varieties: orange rootstocks. This was anticipated be
cause of the more vigorous growth of trees on
Axsft
rough lemon rootstock, and because many of
Gainesville 7 71.2 the groves on sour orange rootstock are on cal
Upper East Coast 3 60.3 careous soil. The effect of rootstock on leaf
iron content may be partially responsible for
Orlando 31 67.5
the very low iron values of groves in the In
Brooksville 15 52.9 dian River (average 51.1 ppm. Fe) and Up
Indian River 15 51.1 per East Coast (average 60.3 ppm. Fe),
Bartov
where 15 out of 18 groves, or 83 percent, were
10 65.3
on sour orange rootstock. This is contrasted
Ridg 30 72.6 with the data for the Ridge district (average
Vest Coast 12 85.9 72.6 ppm. Fe) where 24 out of 25 groves, or
96 percent, were on rough lemon stock.
A separation of the data according to varie
All varieties in all locations:
ties (Table 2) indicates a possible difference
between varieties in their ability to take up,
Rough leaon 64 70.0
store and utilize iron. Valencia orange trees
had the highest average iron content (71.6
Sour orange 45 61.3
ppm.), with leaf iron values for Hamlin (66.8
ppm.), and Parson Brown (65.6 ppm.) trees
being near the average for all varieties, and
Range of leaf iron content vu from 35.0 to 142.0 ppm. Fe. leaves of Pineapple orange trees being quite
36 Table 2
Orlando 9 72,4
Brooksville 3 58.3
Indian River 3 53.3 Rough lemon 20 72.5
Valencia orange Bartov 4 75.6
Upper East Coast 1 76.5 Sour orange U 68.5
Ridge 11 72.9
West Coast 4 85.3
Total 35 Ave. 71.6
Orlando 6 75.4
Gainesville 2 71.8
Brooksville 6 48.9 Rough lemon 12 69.1 -
Hamlin orange Indian River 1 57.5
Bartov 1 58,3 Sour orange 5 59.6
Ridge 3 63.3
West Coast 1 142.0
Total 20 Ave. 66*8
Gainesville 4 74.4
Orlando 2 51.9 Rough lemon 4 65.3
Parson Brown orange Ridge 1 80.0
Bartov 2 63.8 Sour orange 7 65.7
Brooksville J2 56.3
Total 11 Ave. 65.6
Gainesville 1 57.5
Upper East Coast 2 52.3 Rough lemon 5 69.2
Orlando 4 54.1
Pineapple orange Indian River 3 52.5 Sour orange 9 53.4
Ridge 2 89.4
Bartov 2 56.3
Total 14 Ave. 59.1
Brooksville 1 72.5
Duncan grapefruit West Coast 2 52.5 Rough lemon 8 70.1
Bartov 1 5*. 5 Sour orange 1 42.5
Ridge J> 72.7
Total 10 Ave. 66.6
Orlando 2 75.0
Indian River 4 52.0 Rough lemon 9 69.4
Marsh grapefruit Brooksville 1 88.7
West Coast 2 80.0 Sour orange 3 65.1
Ridge _4 78.4
Total 13 Ave. 70.8
low in iron, (59.1 ppm.). The iron content of mean leaf iron content for all varieties in all
the other varieties of citrus was near or locations was found to be 66.6 ppm. Fifty of
slightly higher than the over-all average, with the 123 groves, or 41 percent, had a leaf iron
the exception of the very low average for content below 60 ppm. Sixty-four groves on
Temple oranges (43.8 ppm. Fe). rough lemon rootstock (all varieties in all lo
cations) had a mean leaf iron content of 70
Summary ppm., while 45 groves on sour orange root-
A survey was made to determine the iron stock had a mean leaf iron content of 61 ppm.
content of citrus leaves from groves through Pineapple orange groves (59 ppm. iron) and
out Florida. Leaf samples were collected groves of Temple orange (44 ppm. iron) and
from 123 groves in 21 counties, representing Dancy tangerines (62 ppm. iron) were low in
all of the major citrus growing areas. The leaf iron content compared with the state
Table 3
All varieties1 (123) (2) (17) (3D (25) (20) (14) (14) (50)
66.6 1.6 13.9 25.2 20.3 16.3 11.4 11.4 40.7
Hamlin (20) (2) (1) (6) (4) (4) (1) (2) (9)
66.8 10.0 5.0 30.0 20.0 20.0 5.0 10.0 45.0
Numbers in brackets are number of groves with leaf iron content falling within
each range*
average for all varieties in all locations. All of Upper East Coast and Brooksville districts in
the other varieties on the average had a leaf general were below the state average. The
iron content which was very close to or above low values for the Indian River and Upper
the over-all state average of 66.6 ppm. Leaf East Coast areas were anticipated because of
iron contents of groves in the Indian River, the alkaline nature of the soils in those areas.