Scribd Logo
Importer

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

  • HST 197 Rubrics

    Transféré par

    Evan Leonardo Ash
    37 vues2 pages
    This document provides a grading rubric for written assignments in an history course. For rough drafts worth 10 points, it evaluates the level of analysis, use of examples and citations from the text, and development of an argument. Higher scores are given for more thorough analysis using direct quotations and examples. For final drafts worth 15 points, it evaluates whether the paper follows directions, includes a clear thesis, supports the argument with evidence, is well organized, offers a conclusion, and is grammatically correct. Higher scores are given for papers that meet these criteria at an excellent level.

    Description originale:

    ghsd

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Formats disponibles

    DOCX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd

    Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

    Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

    Signaler ce document
    This document provides a grading rubric for written assignments in an history course. For rough drafts worth 10 points, it evaluates the level of analysis, use of examples and citations from the text, and development of an argument. Higher scores are given for more thorough analysis using direct quotations and examples. For final drafts worth 15 points, it evaluates whether the paper follows directions, includes a clear thesis, supports the argument with evidence, is well organized, offers a conclusion, and is grammatically correct. Higher scores are given for papers that meet these criteria at an excellent level.

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme DOCX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    37 vues2 pages

    HST 197 Rubrics

    Transféré par

    Evan Leonardo Ash
    This document provides a grading rubric for written assignments in an history course. For rough drafts worth 10 points, it evaluates the level of analysis, use of examples and citations from the text, and development of an argument. Higher scores are given for more thorough analysis using direct quotations and examples. For final drafts worth 15 points, it evaluates whether the paper follows directions, includes a clear thesis, supports the argument with evidence, is well organized, offers a conclusion, and is grammatically correct. Higher scores are given for papers that meet these criteria at an excellent level.

    Droits d'auteur :

    © All Rights Reserved
    Téléchargez comme DOCX, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
    Signaler comme contenu inapproprié
    sur 2

    Grading Rubric for Written Assignments

    HST 197 Fall 2017

    Rough Drafts, 10 pts.

    10 pts. Excellent: The draft demonstrates superior knowledge of the text(s) by specifically citing 2-3 examples, including
    direct quotations, which are analyzed in detail. The draft directly answers the question, and an argument is beginning to
    emerge.

    9 pts. Very good: The draft cites 1-2 examples, with at least one direct quotation. It directly answers the prompt, but the
    argument is not yet crystal clear.

    8 pts. Good: The draft demonstrates a close reading of the text(s) with use of specific examples, but lacks direct citations or
    quotes. It answers the prompt, but does not contain a specific argument. The analysis needs development.

    7 pts. Needs improvement: The draft contains a partial answer to the prompt but without specific examples and information.
    There is no argument present. This draft may have one or two errors. Some analysis, but not thoroughly developed. The
    language and main points are very general.

    6 pts. Poor: The draft does not show that the student has completed the readings. It hints at an idea or theme that could be
    useful in the final draft, but does not explore it fully. There are multiple errors and/or a lack of analysis.

    1-5 pts. Substandard: The draft demonstrates no knowledge of the text, and provides only a vague answer to the prompt. It
    contains little solid information and/or many errors.

    0 pts. Student has failed to complete the assignment.


    Final Drafts, 15 pts.

    Does the paper follow the directions of the assignment? YES or NO

    Criteria Unacceptable Poor Fair Good Excellent


    Is there a strong and 0 pts. 1 pt. 2 pts. 3 pts. 4 pts.
    evident statement of
    argument at the
    beginning of the
    essay?
    Is the argument 0 pts. 1 pt. 2 pts. 3 pts. 4 pts.
    supported by
    appropriate
    evidence that is
    correctly cited?
    Is the paper well 0 pts. 1 pt. 2 pts. 3 pts. 4 pts.
    organized? Does it
    stick to the point?
    Are there smooth
    transitions between
    paragraphs and
    ideas?
    Is a real conclusion 0 pts. 0.25 pts. 0.5 pts. 0.75 pts. 1 pt.
    offered in the final
    paragraph?
    Is the paper free of 0 pts. 0.5 pts. 1 pt. 1.5 pts. 2.0 pts.
    basic grammatical
    errors?

    Specific Comments:

    Vous aimerez peut-être aussi