Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Thandaveswara
This method comprises measuring the mean velocity V and the flow area 'A' and
computing the discharge Q from the continuity equation. The site which satisfies the
discharge measurement. The requirements of the site are dealt with in detail in
standards of the ISI 1192, (1959). The discharge measurement site is then marked by
ISI 1192, (1959), "Velocity area methods for measurement of flow of water in open
4.2.1 Segmentation
The interval at which the depth of water is measured along the cross-section for
The intervals specified are also such that not more than 10 percent and preferably not
more than 4 percent variations in the discharge between two adjacent segments occur.
The discharge through any segment is also not allowed to be more than 10 percent of
maintained that the mean velocity does not differ by more than 20 percent with respect
to the lower value of the two velocity measurements. In no case less than five velocity
verticals for depth and velocity measurements are kept the same according to Table
shown below.
Pivot point method is common, the details of which are available in the ISI : 1192-1959.
Angular, Stadia method and method of linear measurement are also used for locating
When velocities and depths are smaller and width up to 0.9 m, observations can be
made using wading or suspension rods. However, when wading observations are found
difficult, sounding rods of wood and bamboo are used. When depths are in excess of
about 4.6 m or current is too swift to permit the use of sounding rod, hand line is used
for depth measurement. But when the depths are large and velocities are high even the
hand-lines cannot be used. Under such circumstances a cable line is lowered by means
of a crane. Echo sounders of indicator as well as recorder type are being used for depth
measurements.
For the measurement of velocity the current meters are most commonly used. IS: 3910
- 1966 gives specifications for cup type current meter and IS: 3918 - 1966 gives the
a number of points along the vertical. This is done when results are required to be
accurate, or for purpose of calibration. In two-point method the velocity observations are
made at 0.2 and 0.8 depth below the surface while in one point method observations is
made at 0.6 depth below the surface. Both the two-point and one point methods are in
observations just below the surface is also used during floods when other methods are
not feasible.
In high floods at times, even surface measurement of velocity by current meter may not
be possible, float measurements are then used using surface floats, double floats or
special types of floats (IS 3911 - 1966). Velocity rods (IS 4858 - 1968) are also used
generally for velocity observations in canals. Details of the method are given in IS: 1192
(1959).
In adopting the float method or the surface velocity method in which current meter is
used, a reduction coefficient is used to change surface velocity into mean velocity in
each vertical. Measurements on Indus River in Sind at Mithankot, Sukur and Kotri
during 1911-1920 (Indus River commission records, "discharge, silt, velocity and
1922, part II, pages 1 to108) showed that reduction coefficient varied between 0.74 and
0.92 when the depth variation was from 2.44 to 13.72 m and surface velocity from 0.19
to 5.09 m/s.
The studies in canal were similarly made by Mysore Engineering Research Station at 32
sites. The mean velocity V of the cross-section was obtained by the current meter
A relationship between the surface velocity Vs and the mean velocity V in terms of
Vs
=1 + 2.5 g / C
V
V
The usual assumption made in practice is that s = 0.85 which corresponds to 'C' value
V
that the reduction coefficient would be applicable only to a particular stream for which it
has been determined, since it would depend on the relative roughness of the channel,
depth, slope, etc., and hence it would be different for different streams, and for
fluctuating flood stages even in a given stream. It is therefore, recommended by the BIS
that the reduction coefficients should be found out from actual field observations made
by a current meter and only if such determination of the coefficient is not possible during
high flood stages then the reduction coefficient should be extrapolated to the stage from
stage or lack of equipment, the slope area method is adopted for rough estimation of
the discharge.
The requirements of the site are mostly similar to those for area velocity method. The
method. The velocity formula used is that of Manning, the energy slope for non-uniform
flow . The roughness coefficient value to be used is related to bed material size and
Regular recording of discharges over a period of time is essential for correct estimation
of water resources of river basins and subsequent planning and utilization. Daily
discharge observations over a long period are sometimes not feasible. The estimation
of the discharge is then achieved by using proper stage discharge relation. The method
adopted for the preparation of the stage discharge relationship for the different river
basins as well as the the exhaustive instruction for adopting the method of estimation of
(b) Instruments
Reference:
Alluvial Streams, Central Board of Irrigation and Power, a Status Report Number 3, New