Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
martensite
,
E. Pagounis , M. J. Szczerba, R. Chulist, and M. Laufenberg
Magnetic shape memory (MSM) materials based on Ni- is difficult to obtain in 14M martensites. This is because a
Mn-Ga single crystals have been the subject of intensive larger driving force is necessary to achieve MSM effect in an
investigation due to their large potential in actuator, sensor, alloy with large distortion of the lattice. Magnetic anisotropy
and energy harvesting applications.13 Magneto-mechanical measurements have been carried out by Sozinov, Straka, and
properties in these materials are significantly affected by the co-workers,11,12 and a room temperature anisotropy of nearly
martensitic structure in which the MSM effect takes place. 170 kJ/m3 was deduced. In order, however, for such materials
Among the three martensites obtained in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys, to be usable for actuator applications a reversible MFIS is
namely, the five-layered (10M), the seven-layered (14M), and needed, as well as a large magnetic field-induced work out-
the non-modulated (NM) one, materials with the 14M modu- put.13,14 To date, no fully reversible MFIS or positive work
lation have received the least attention. This is because such output has been obtained in 14M martensites. In the present
structures are obtained in a relatively narrow temperature work, we repeatedly produced Ni-Mn-Ga actuator elements
interval, they are unstable, and very much dependent on the with 14M martensitic structure, demonstrating a large actua-
chemical composition and prior thermo-mechanical treatment. tion work output. Magneto-mechanical properties such as
The seven-layered martensite in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys was MFIS, magneto-stress and magneto-crystalline anisotropy are
first discovered by Martynov and Kokorin,4 and its structure studied in detail, and are correlated with the obtained crystal
has been studied in detail by Chernenko, Pons, and co-work- structure.
ers.5,6 Righi et al.7 determined the modulated crystal struc- The Ni-Mn-Ga single crystal has been grown using a
ture of 14M martensite by refining the X-ray powder modified Bridgman technique at ETO MAGNETIC GmbH.
diffraction pattern using the Rietveld method. They found Details of the process are described elsewhere.15 After pro-
that the basic structure belongs to monoclinic symmetry. duction the crystal was heat treated and oriented using mar-
While most of those studies were carried out using polycrys- tensitic crystal structure data and electron backscattered
talline samples, little progress has been reported on the diffraction (EBSD). Subsequently, the crystal was cut in such
magneto-mechanical properties of 14M single crystalline a way that the sample faces were nearly parallel to the {100}
alloys. This is because appropriate Ni-Mn-Ga single crystals planes of the parent cubic phase. Chemical composition was
that possess a pure 14M lattice modulation suitable for such measured by EDX to be Ni50.5-Mn28.9-Ga20.6 at. % (accu-
measurements have been difficult to produce repeatedly, as racy 6 0.6%). Transformation temperatures were determined
this martensitic structure usually coexists with the thermody- using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) with a Netzsch
namically more stable NM one. analyser (Model DSC 204). The austenite, martensite, and
Because of the larger magnetic field-induced strain Curie point temperatures measured TA 351 K, TM 343 K,
(MFIS) obtained in 14M structures, as compared to the widely and TC 369 K, respectively.
used 10M martensites, these materials are attractive for engi- X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements, using a Bruker
neering applications. To date, the largest MFIS in 14M mar- D8 diffractometer with a Co radiation and a linear detector
tensites measured around 9.5%.8,9 This is close to the with an angular range of 2.5 were performed to analyze the
maximum theoretical strain due to lattice distortion, which in martensitic structures. The lattice parameters were obtained
these alloys measured 10.66%.8 Straka10 reported that the by texture type measurements consisting of h/2h scans per-
large lattice distortion of around 10% is the reason that MFIS formed at different v and u values (differently oriented sin-
gle crystal). This procedure enables to scan an appropriate
a)
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: orientation region in order to detect diffraction peaks of the
e.pagounis@etogroup.com {400} planes. In each of the scans, a large range of 2h angles
reported earlier in 14M martensites.8,12 A reasonable explana- stresses associated with sample fixation, friction effects, etc.
tion for this is the faster approach to saturation measured This error has been confirmed in several hundred measure-
along the [001] direction, compared to that reported in the ments carried out internally at ETO MAGNETIC, and has
previous studies.12 It suggests that during the measurement also been reported in the literature.10,21
only few remaining variants with hard axes in the magnetiza- It is interesting to observe in Fig. 3 that a fully reversible
tion direction exist. Accordingly, when fully compressed, the MFIS is obtained in the present alloy. It means that the
present sample is believed to have a structure which is very magneto-stress the sample produces is larger than the me-
close to the single variant state. chanical force needed to return the sample to its initial shape
In Fig. 3, the magneto-mechanical stress-strain curve of over the complete elongation cycle of 11.2%. The condition
the Ni-Mn-Ga single crystal is shown. The experimental pro- for achieving a reversible MFIS is:10
cedure to obtain this curve is identical to that described in
Ref. 17 for a Ni-Mn-Ga sample with a 10M structure. The Ka =e0 > 2rtw : (2)
measurement demonstrates a huge MFIS of 11.2%, which is In Ni-Mn-Ga alloys with a 10M martensitic structure, it
the largest reported to date in Ni-Mn-Ga 14M martensites. It is well established that the Equation (2) is fulfilled when
is also very close to the maximum theoretical MFIS of rtw < 1:5 MPa.10 To date, no fully reversible MFIS has been
11.4%. It confirms the observation, derived above from the reported in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys with a 14M martensitic struc-
magnetization curve, that in the present alloy the single vari- ture, because the twinning stresses exceeded 1 MPa (typi-
ant structure is easier to obtain. Furthermore, the large MFIS cally 1.5 MPa) and the ratio measured Ka =e0 1.6 MPa. In
is combined with a reduced twinning stress of 0.64 MPa, and the present alloy, however, a considerably lower twinning
a magnetically-induced work output of WM 70 kJ/m3. stress of rtw 0.64 MPa is measured and, thus, Equation (2)
Because of the low twinning stress and the resulting low me- is fulfilled.
chanical work needed to reset the sample a positive effective Until recently, the largest MFIS in Ni-Mn-Ga 14M mar-
work output of 20 kJ/m3 was produced. tensites has been around 9.5%, with the theoretical limit being
The widely used MSM model proposed by Likhachev 10.66%.8,9 In Ref. 8 a twinning stress of rtw 1.5 MPa was
and Ullakko combines the magneto-crystalline anisotropy measured in the 14M martensite, while the magnetic stress
energy Ka with lattice parameters and the magneto-stress of can be calculated as rmax
M 1.5 MPa. Taking into account the
an MSM material as follows:20 widely accepted condition for the MSM effect (rtw < rmax M ),
the reported MFIS of over 9% cannot be actually justified. In
Ka rmax
M e0 ; (1)
fact, based on Fig. 3 measured in that study, a smaller MFIS
where rmax of about 5%6% should have been obtained. Nevertheless,
M is the maximum magneto-stress and e0 is the lat-
tice distortion. Using the experimentally measured anisotropy the magneto-mechanical properties rmax M and rtw were very
Ka 195 kJ/m3 and the lattice distortion of 11.4%, a maxi- close to each other, and, by assuming experimental errors, the
mum magnetic stress of rmax large MFIS reported in Ref. 8 is plausible.
M 1:71 MPa is calculated. This
is slightly lower than the experimentally measured magneto- The larger lattice distortion measured in the present
stress of 1.78 MPa (Fig. 3), but larger than that previously alloy may be attributed to its higher martensite transforma-
reported in the literature.11 It should be, however, mentioned tion temperature TM, which in fact is linked to the chemical
that an experimental error of around 65% for the maximum composition. Previous work with 10M martensites has
magnetic stress derived from the measurement presented in shown that lattice distortion at room temperature is propor-
Fig. 3 is typically introduced due to the influence of external tional to the TM.16,22 The same applies also for the 14M
structure, however, the increase in lattice distortion with TM
is only moderate here.22 This can also be concluded from the
experimental results in Ref. 11.
In a further investigation, the structure of the self-
accommodated (i.e., non-trained) martensite was found to have
a five-layered modulation (10M), as can be deduced from Fig.
4(a). The measured lattice parameters were a10M 5.98 A,
b10M 5.94 A, and c10M 5.56 A, which are typical for a 10M
structure. This observation indicates that the uni-axial com-
pression (training) at room temperature initiated a stress-
induced 10M ! 14M intermartensitic transformation, which in
turn increased the effective MFIS of the Ni-Mn-Ga sample. No
reverse transformation has been observed when the compres-
sion stress was removed. Similar stress-assisted transformation
FIG. 3. Stress vs. strain curve during a complete actuation cycle, demon- in a Ni-Mn-Ga single crystal was observed by Martynov.23
strating a MFIS of 11.2%. The Ni-Mn-Ga sample elongates in the presence However, in that study, a substantially larger compression
of the magnetic field (H 1 T), and returns to its original shape by mechani- stress had to be applied to initiate the process, and no MFIS
cal compression at zero field. The maximum magnetic stress rmax M , the twin- was measured.
ning stress rtw at half the maximum strain, and the effective work output
Weff 20 kJ/m3 are indicated, too. In the inset, the strain vs. field curve at The increased lattice distortion in the present alloy may,
zero pre-stress further demonstrates the giant MFIS of 11.2%. accordingly, also be attributed to the stress-induced nature of
152407-4 Pagounis et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 152407 (2015)