Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

FIRST ELEMENT

Definition/ Section Cases

Proposal =S.2 (a): when one person


signifies his willingness to another
person to do anything or abstain for
doing anything.

Acceptance = S.2 (b): when the Affin Credit (M) Sdn. Bhd. V. Yap
person signifies his assent to the Yuen Fui
proposer. Held:The agreement is void ab initio
for lack of offer and acceptance
S.2 (c):* the person making the
proposal: promisor

*the person accepting the proposal:


promisee

S.2 (e): Every promise and every set


of promise forming consideration.

S.2 (g): Agreement not enforceable


by law is void.

S.2 (h): Agreement must enforceable


by law.

S.3: A proposer must communicate


his proposal to intended promisee.

a) Communication Williams v Carwardine


R v Clarke
S.4 (1): Communication of a proposal Gibbons v Proctor
is complete when it comes to the Fitch & Anor v Snedakar
knowledge of promisee.

S.4 (2)(a): Communication of an


acceptance is complete as against
proposer when it is posted/put in a
course of transmission.

S.4 (2)(b): Communication of an


acceptance is complete as against
acceptor when it comes to the
knowledge of the proposer.

S.4 (3) (a): Communication of


revocation is complete as against Byrne & Co. v Leon Van Tienhoven &
proposer when it is posted/put in a Co.
course of transmission.

S.4 (3) (b): Communication of


revocation is complete as against
acceptor when it comes to the
knowledge of the proposer.

b) Particular person/ general public Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.


Boulton v Jones
c) Revocation

S.5: A proposal may be revoked at


any time before the communication of
acceptance is complete as against
proposer

S.5(2): An acceptance may be


revoked at any time before
communication of the acceptance is
complete as against acceptor.

S.6: There are 4 methods of


revocation by lapse of time, by notice
of revocation, by failure to fulfil the
condition precedent, by death or
mental disorder

S.6(a): A proposer may be revoked Banque Parobas v Citibank NA


his proposal by communication of Routledge v Grant
notice of revocation.

S.6 (b): A proposal end by lapse of


time. A proposal stated to last for a
period of time cannot be accepted
after that time.

S.6 (c): A proposal revoked by failure PYM V Campbell


of the acceptor to fulfil the condition Financing Ltd v Stimson
precedent to acceptance.

S.6 (d): A proposal revoked by death


or mental disorder of proposer, if the Dickinson v Dodds
fact of his death comes to the
knowledge of acceptor b4
acceptance.

S.7 (a): An acceptance must be Lee Seng Heng v The Guardian


absolute and unqualified. Assurance Co. Ltd

S.7(b): An acceptance must Counter offer:


expressed in reasonable manner. Diamond Peak Sdn. Bhd v RD
Tweedle
S.8: Performance of a proposal is an Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
acceptance of the proposal

1) Goods on display Pharmaceutical Society of Great


Britain v Boots Cash Chemists
( Southern) Ltd
Fisher v Bell
2) Auctions M & J Frozen Food Sdn Bhd & Anor v
Siland Sdn. Bhd. & Anor
Payne v Cave
Harris v Nickerson
3) Advertisement Coelho v The Public Services
Commission
Partridge v Crittenden
4) Supply of information Harvey v Facey

5) Antecedent Communication Abdul Rashid Abdul Majid v Island


Golf and Properties Sdn. Bhd.
S.9: Express: made in words Excemption
Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd
Implied: otherwise than words Clarke v Earl of Dunraven
Taylor v Allon
Silent Felthouse v Bindley
Fraser v Everett
Instantaneous means of Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corp
communication

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi