A0 A055 752 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS WASHINGTON 0 C F/S 15/5

(U)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNCLASSIFIED
I
I
__ I
I _ _ _ _ _
I fl
___ _____
It
__ _ _ H
 10 ~2 8 ~

________ .
~
1315 22
3.5

11 :I
20
~ ~
~~~~
hIf f ip25

~~~~~
NATIONAL BUREAU OP STAN
~~RDS
MIC~ OGOP~ ~(SOtUTIOII TEST CKSRT
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 FOR ~J~T11ER TRAN ~~~~~ I

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE CHIE OF NAVAL OPEI AT ION5
~~
- ~ ~
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350
/ , Ser
j# ~\
~~~
05 .~~ ~78
From : Chief of Naval Operations
To: Distribution List

Subj: Final Report of Phase I of An Analys is of Navy

Logistic Planning Factors Study ; promulgation of

End : (
1) Subject Report

1. The study , An Analys is of Navy Logistic Planning Factors ,

~~~ was undertaken to develop a rationale and methodology for up-.
dating or validating Navy logistic planning factors used in
the Joint Operation Planning System (JOPS) . The study is being
conducted in two phases , as follows :
a. Phase I; for items used in peacetime , development of
rationale and methodology for constructing logistic planning
factors are based on peacetime issue data , and adjusted by combat

f >.
a.
intensity factors such as wartime vs. peacetime flying hours
and steaming hours . For nonpeacetime items (basically non
nuclear ordnance ), the logistic planning factors will be derived
~~~ from the Nonnuclear Ordnance Requirements (NNOR) system.
~~~ (Nuclear ordnance is not included in this study.)

b. Phase II; acquisition of an automated data base ;

Li... testing of the me thods developed in Phase I ; and production
of prototype wartime planning factors.

2. The study has acquired a data base of 1 year s issue data

~~~~ (October 1974 to September 1975) for use in Phase II of the
study . Analysis of the data and calculation of prototype
factors are scheduled for completion by 30 September 1978.

3. Enclosure (1), describ ing the Phase I effort , now completed ,

is forwarded .

78 06 19
~~~~
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -~ -~~-- --~~~~~

,Ept ~~r v CL A SSIFI CA flON OF i bilt P l O t (~ b.n 0*. tne.r.d)

READ 12~STRU C T!ONS
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE BEFORE COMPLETING FORM
I. ~ EPO~~T ~ UM S tN 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO 3. RECIPIENT S CATA LOG NUMSER

4.! S TIN E OF R~~~O~~?

_!.!k~~(*W 44.bElU.) ~ ~ t ~~ oo COVENED

~ An Analysis of Navy Logistic Interim

( Planning Factors .
~ S. PINPONMIMO ORG. R EPORT NUMS ER
- ~

/J
P~~_________
&iJ HOR ~u ~~~ S. CONTRACT OR GRANT NU$I.~~ I)
J P . A ./ Fries, Jr.
IB.~A. /Grube r
\
(~ ~r)f/ ~ rt ~.p7~7
1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

J .~/Lemix~, Kj ralbott ____________________________
IS. PROG RAM E~~~MCNt PROJECT . TASK
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2. PIRFORMIMG-ORGA NIZATION NAM E ANC AGO REU AR I A S WORK UNIT NUMURS

Chi e f of Naval Operations (OP-40lG)
~
Washington, D.C.

I
II. CONTROI..U1*O OFFICE NAME A NO ADDRESS ~~~~ EPOftf ~~A Y t

Dep uty Chief of Naval Ope rations 7/ ( i ~~ Mar

~~~~~~~~ ]
(Logistics) OP04, Washington , D.C.
110
14. I ONIT O RING AGENCY NAM E I AOORESS( S1 dSl1 *~~~ ft C*u,.iUn5 011k.) IS. SECURITY Cl.A3$.
Chief of Naval Operations , Unclassified
Systems Analysis Division , (OP96)
Washington , D.C. I1~~ OECL.AUIF,CAT1OW OOVNGRAOING
S~ M LOU LI

IS. OSSYRI SUflON STATEM ENT (.1 lAd . R.p**)

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited

G
I?. STAT EM ENT (. lA. aIu~~~ ffi I
1 .
S 20. St m1M~~~e Rsp~~~) ~~~~
~~ 5~ tIO~
$f _
~~ ~ ~~~~

5. SUPNI.EMEN1ARY NOTES

IS. ELY WORDS (C-y

~ ., I. ii a s ~~~~~ y
.
.
,.u
, d d IdINEIfr by bkch Ai I r )

20. AS$TRACT (C.eui.. .,

~~.. sIN. SI i~ Iuss y d Sd Itp by Musk a 5..)

This report describes Phase I of a two phase study . The study is an

inhous e e f f o r t by Navy personne l with contractor assistance .
Phase I of the study develops a rationale and methodology for the
creation or validation of Navy Logisti c Planning Factors used in the Joint
Ope ration Planning Sys tem Phase II will acquire a data base and test the
-
~

prop9~ e d I ~~~rB~r~~ oducing prototype logistic planning factors .

C~ The Navy desire s that Service planning be coxr atible with Joint Plan-
~
ning to the extent feasible . For this reason , the Navy resupply 1oqistic
~~
DO
~~~
1473 (DIll ON OF I NOV 1$ 5 O $ O
S/N QtQ24 P.~314.6SOt
~~~~~ ,
-. .
.
.. .
_ .
~~~~~~

~~.. .a
~ & ~t1
~~
.
~~~~ ~~ I__ I~
_____
 SECURITY CLASSI FICATION OF TWI S .A ~~~ (Wha, D* Zns. ,.4)
~

planning factor data published in Table 1.5 of Logistics Re fe rence Da ta,

NAVMAT P-4000-2 were selected as pr otot ~es for use in the Joint Operation
Planning Sys tem and in the Logistics Annex of the Joint Strategic Capa-
bilities Plan.
For peacetime based consumption of Navy ma teriel , methodology recom-
men de d in this report consists of a computerized analysis of Navy issue
data collected from all sources ,~.$GSA, DLA, Services) in the period 1 October
1974 to 30 September 19 75 . Thist4a~ a_will be processed at the Navy Regional
Data Automation Cente r , Washington, D.C7~ Peace ti me consump tion will then be
adjusted to wartime rate s by applying combat intensity factors and theater
environment factors . The methodology for conventional alnmunit.ic2n, not
normally consumed in ~~~ time~ will be covered in the Phase II re port .

O _ _
~~~~; C . , \O~
~~ ~- ~~
..~~ .
.

~~~~~

\~

~ ~ ~~~~~~
. I
n, t
~
>
~~,~~-

\
\

- -

1I
~~ ~~
_ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _

ANALYSIS OF
NAV Y LOGISTI C
PLANNING FACT ORS
PHASE 1
1
~
OFFICE OF THE
CHIEF OF NA V AL OPERAT IONS

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - ~~~~---- .- -~~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ - -~~ - .
-
-I

AN ANAL YSIS OF NAVY

LOGISTIC P LANNING FACTOR S

PHASE I R EPO RT

15 March 1978
_ _ _ _ - -~-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ---- - ---- ----- ----- -

TABL E OF CONTENTS

PAGE
TABL E OF CONTENTS . ................. i
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ............ ii
.. ........ ....... .
.

EXE CUTIVE SUIMARY ii i

I. INTRODUCTION .................. I] .

A. Purpose . ................. Ii
B.
C. Ex c lu s ions ..........
Method of A n a l y s i s . 13
14

II. DISCUSSION . . . . . . .... 11i

A . General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
I d e n t i f i c a t i o n of a Methodology . . . . . .
11i
B. 11 4

III. FINDINGS . ..... ........ Illi

IV. RECOMMENDATIONS ................ IVl
APPENDICES

A.
B.
Study D i r e c t iv e
Study P l a n .. .. .. .. .. Ai
Bl
C.

D.
P l a n n i n g System
Summa ry of Phase I by JOPS Class
. . .. .
B r i e f D i s c u s s i o n of J o i n t Operational

... . Ci
D].
E. R e l e v a n t Resupply LPF L i t e r a t u r e S umma ry . E i

... .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
F. Summary of I n t e r vi ew s . F-i
G. Classification Matrix Gl
H. DO~ 4DS D ata Base . . Hi

J.
I.
..
JCS P u b l i c a t i o n 6 Vol. II P a r t 5 t ha pt e r 1
Glossary .
.. ..... . I i
31
K.
L.
Bibliography
Membership of the Stud y Group
.

.... . Ki
Ll

3.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 LIST OF TABLES

PAG E

Table 111
.................
Fleet Logistics Planners Force
114

.....
List .

Table 112 Conceptual Aggregation Problem 11 7

Table 113 FSC An alysis . ......... .. 11 10

Table 114 General LPF Computation ........ 1114

Table G1 N avy Cogn i zance

Classification .......
. . l. to. .JOPS
.Symbo G2

LIST OF FIGURES

Fi g u r e Ci JOPS I n f o r m a t i o n Flow ......... C3

-i

L
ii

~~-~~~~~~~~ - -
 EXE CUT PIE SUM MARY

An Analysis of Navy Logistics Planning Factors Study

This report describes Phase I of a two phaE~.. study , An

Analysis of Navy Logistic Planning Factors . The study is

an inhouse effort by Navy personnel with contractor assis

t ance , authorized by OP04 study direct ive Ser 401/219311 of

7 April 1977. Membership of the study group is listed in

Appendix L to the report.

Phase I of the study is intended to develc~ a rationale

and methodology for the creation or validation of Navy

Logistic Planning Factors (LPF) used in the Joint Operation

Planning System (JOPS). Phase II will aa~uire a data base

and test the proposed rationale and methodology by producing

prototype LPFs. LPF5 are used pr imarily by staffs of Uni-

fie d Commands and ~3ervice Components (Fleet, Air Force , Army

and Marine Corps Commands ) to compute manpower billets and

replacements , materiel support requirements; facilities and

t r a n s por t a t i o n r e q u i r em e n t s to support and move the combat

forces designated in j o i n t operation p l a n s .

J o i n t Chiefs of Staff memorandum SM77476 of 16

September 1976 (Attachment 1 to Appendix C) requires that

the Services provide certified logistic planning factors for

use in joint operation planning . The Navy desires that

i n t e r n a l Navy l o g i s t i c p l a n n in g be co mp a t i b l e w i t h j o i n t

planning to the exten t feasible. For this reason , the Navy

iii

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~.- ~~.- -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 . -- .- -- - - - - - - - -- ..-----
~~ - - -~~~~~ -- -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _ ~

resupply LPF data published in Table 1.5 of Logistics Ref-

erence Data, NAVMAT P 40002 were selected as prototypes for
use in JOPS and in the Logistic Annex (Annex B) of the Joint
Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP).
For peacetime based Navy materiel the LPF developmental
methodology recommended in this Phase I Repor t consists of a
computerized analysis of Navy issue data collected from all
sources, in the period 1 October 1974 to 30 September 1975.
A key element of the methodology is the conversion of issue
data from Federal Supply Class (FSC) in which the data is
collected and managed , to DOD Supply Class, by which
operation and logistic support planning is accomplished .
This data, consisting large ly of seventy reels of tape,
provided by the Department of Defense Materiel Distribution
Study , will be processed at the Navy Regional Data
Automation Center (NARDAC), Washington, D.C. Other data
will be provided directly from Navy sources. The peacetime
data will then be adjusted to w a r t i m e r a t e s, where

necessary , by applying wartime vs peacetim e operating tempos

H (e.g., wartime vs peacetime flying hours), also called
combat intensity factors (CIF), and theater erivirorsnent
factors. A methodology for materiel not normal ly consumed
in peacetim e (e.g., conventional anmunition) will be covered
in the Phase II report.
Phase I of the study was completed 30 November 1977.
Phase II is scheduled to be completed 30 September 1978.

E .
iv
j
L -~~~-~~~~~~~~ ----- - - -- - - - - - - - --
~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~ -- -- ---- --
--- - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

AN ANALYSIS OF

NAVY LOGISTIC PLANNING FACTORS

PHASE I

I. INTRODUCTION

A. Purpose

1. All Navy logistics planning syscems are based on

planning factors of one sort or another depend ing on the
requirement for and level of the planning . Logistic Plan
fling Factors (LPF ) are developed and utilized to simplify
the logistics planners overall task and to reduce the time
r eq u i r e d to produce necessary p lans. S imply d e f i n e d , LPFS
are a c t u a l or e s t i m a t e d relationships that may be used to

predict a need in t h e f u t ur e for some form of l o g i s t i c s ac

tion . Such a r e l a t i o n s h i p migh t involve t ime , weigh t ,

volume , or other measurement u n i t s which are used in p l a n -

n i n g supply , resupply , and t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . A r e s u p p l y LPF

is a measure of materiel consumption required to sustain a

depl oyed unit. An example of such a resupply planning
f a c t o r w o u l d be an expression of food c o n su mp t i o n for a

c r u i s e r e xpressed in pounds of provisions per day per man.

LPFs are essential to the success of the Navy s operation

plans (OPLAN ) in that they are required to:
a. Fulfill the Navy s responsibilities in the
Joint Operations Planning System (JOPS) (see
Appendix C)

b. Support the Joint Strategic Capabilities

Plan

I 1

-
 . . - -.
. ~~~~~~~~ ---~~ - - - -

2. C u r r e n t l y , t h e resupply LPF5 utilized by Navy

planners are contained with~ ~i Table 1.5 of L o g i s t i c s Refer-

ence Data, NAVMAT P40002. This table contains data that
has not been reviewed in depth for several years and has
not been adapted to f u l f i l l the r e q u i r e m e n t s of the CINC

p l a n n e r for input into the JOPS . C o n se q u e n t l y the useful-

ness of these planning factors in their current form is

limited and their validity in doubt.
3. As set forth in SM 77476 (Attachment 1 to Ap-
pendix C), the Navy is responsible for developing , de-
fining, and validating the logistic planning factors which
they require to be used for joint operations planning .
4. The Navy Inspector General Report of the 17

September 1976 Command Inspe ction of CINCPAC FLT Hea ~~ uar-

ters~.
/ recommended that a review of JOPS oriented resupply
planning factors be undertaken to ensure that valid nonunit
related movement requirements are being generated in support
of CINCPAC FLT OPLAN5 . Generation of such movement require-
ments is directly dependent on the validity of the LPFs used
by the planners.
5. The Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (Logistics )
issued a study directive on 7 April 1977, (Appendix A) to
initiate an analysis of Navy LPF5 to be conducted as a CNO

1/ Navy Inspector General Re port , Com mand Inspe ction of

CIN CPACFL T H e a d q u a r t e r s , S u b j e c t : C r e d i b i l i t y of OPLA N Re
s u p p l y P l a n n i n g , 4 1476 ( C o n f i d e n t i a l ) , 717 Sept ember 1976

12

--- --- -.-.- ----- -- - -- . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -

_ -~~~~ - - - - ~~
.
~~~
-
~~~~~~

i n h o u s e s t u d y w i t h contractor t e c h n i c a l supp ort. The ob-

j e c t i v e of the study is to: I d e n t i f y and record existing

r a t i o n a l e and methodology and , as appr o p r i a t e, develop new

r a t i o n a l e and methodologies by which l o g i s t i c s plans ,

r e q u i r e m e n t s, and b u d g e t s using these f a c t o r s w i l l be more

credible and supportable to higher authority. This report

is the result of the initial phase of this study. It

identifies and proposes a methodology , whereby resupply LPF5
may be established and promulga ted for use by the CINC
l o g i s t i c s planners as basic i n p u t s f o r OPLAN S in t h e JOPS

process.
B. Method of A n a l y s i s

In order to conduct t h e study , t h e S t u d y Group

performed the following:

L i t e r a t u r e Search A search of l i t e r a t u re and

a u t h o r i t a t i v e r e f e r e n c e s was conducted c o n c e r n i n g t h e JOPS ,

c u r r e n t p l a n n i n g f a c t o r s , and developmental methodology .

Interviews D i s c u s s i o n s were h e l d with cogn i zant

personnel at Navy , Arm y , Air Force and Joint Agencies to

research the development and use of planning factors.

Investigation and Data Gathering An a n a l y s i s was

performed of systems utilizing LPFs to determine their use
in o p e r a t i o n a l and m o b i l i z a t i o n p l a n n in g. D a t a and

documentation, as a v a i l a b l e, were collected and catalogued

for futur e application.

1 3
~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -- ---_
_ - _ _ _
_ _ _

Modeling Modeling t e c h n i q u e s w e r e developed f o r

computing and v a l i d a t in g JOPS o r i e n t e d r e s u p pl y LPFs .

Testing
In Phase II of t h i s s tu d y , v a r i ou s
s i m u l a t i on and t e s t i n g t e c h n i q ue s will be applied to v e r if y

t h e pr oposed methodology prior to i t s being p r o m u l g a t e d fo r

use by t h e Navy .

C. Exclusions
Nuclear weapons and propu lsion related planning
f a c t o r s are excluded from t h e scop e of t h i s s tu dy .

14
p.- - - -
~~~~
-- --
~~~~~~~~~~~~
-_ -- -------- - -_- - ______________

II. DISCUSSION
A. General

1. As r e q u i r e d by the Stud y D i r e c t iv e , t h e Stud y

Group revi ewe d Navy LPFs with emphasis on those f a c t o r s re-

q u i r e d for valid inputs to the Planning Factors File of the

JOPS Movement Requirements Generator (MRG) (see Appendix C)

and for i n c l u s i o n in the Logistic Annex of the FY 78 JScP .

L i t e r a t u r e r e v i e w and i n t e r v i e w s by t h e St udy Grou p

i n d i c a t e d t h a t the Navy uses LPFs in t h e f o l l o w i n g proces-

ses:

a. J o i n t Operation P l a n n i n g System (JOPS ).

The JOPS is a standard , DODwide automated system for the

development , c o o r d i n a t i o n, d i s s e m i n a t i o n, review , and ap

prova l of OP L1ANS. (See Appendix C ) . LPE ~ are required as

i n p u t s to t h i s system to arriv e at a final evaluation of

OPLAN t r a n s por t a t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s and feasibility.

b. J o i n t S t r a t e g i c C a p a b i l i t i e s P l a n (JS ~ P ) .

Annex B ( L o g i s t i c s) of t h e ~..SCP r e q u i r e s Service input of

p l a n n i n g f a c t o r s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h those r e q u i r e d for i n p u t to
j ops to e n s u r e s t a n d a r d i z e d a p p l i c a t i o n by all commands and

to f a c i l i t a t e annual Service review and update. Valid LPFs

are required to provide credibility to the annual movement

a n a l y s i s required by JSCP .

c. J o i n t S t r a t egi c O bj ec t i v e s P l a n ( JSOP ).

The JSOP develops s t r a t e g y , force p l a n n i n g g u i d a n c e , and

force r e q u i r e m e n t s in c o n s i d e r a t i o n of t h r e a t , national

111
~

object ives, and policy. LPFs are used to develop the logi s-
tics r e q u i r e m e n t s for support of the s t r a t e g y .
d. War Reserve M a t e r i e l Stock ( WRMS ). In the
event of hostilities, the WRMS is intended to ensure that

combat forces have a deq u a t e supplies on hand to carry them

until resupply .
2. Generally the f a c t o r s being emphasized in t h i s
s t u dy are the resupply factors for JOPS and JSCP. These
resupply LPFs are published in Table 1.5 of Logistics

Reference Data, NAVMAT P4000 2. Although background

i n f o r m a t i o n in t h i s p u b l i c a t io n i n d i c a t e s t h a t Table 1.5 was

based on consumption data developed from cperating forces

d u r i n g d i f f e r e n t degrees of i n t e n s i t y in t h e S o u t h e as t A s i a

combat environment , the Study Group found that details

r e l a t i ng to the specific methodologies used to collect and
r e por t data and to develop a n d/ o r revi ew the r e s u p p l y

p l a n n i n g f a c t o r s w e r e not a v a i l a b l e . T h e r e f o r e, t h e

c r e d i b i l i t y of the c u r r e n t planning factors and the

r e l i a b i l i t y of the me t ho ds used in their development could

not be v a l i d a t e d . Thus , by consensus of t h e Study Group and

as recommended to and approved by the Chairma n of the

Advi so ry Com mittee, it was decided t h a t f urther research on

reconstruction of the rational e and methodology used in the
development of the e x i s t i n g resupply planning f a c t o r s would
not be f r u i t f u l . The r e m a i n in g e f f o r t d u r i n g Ph ~~~e I

concentrated on developing JOPS related planning factor

11 2

-- - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 - ---- --- -
~~ ~~ ~~~

t a b l e s for all resuppl y LPF5 w i t h the exception of

A m m u n i t i o n (Class V ) , and the deve l opment of a new

methodology . A JOPS related methodology for Ammunition

(Class V) will be based upon expected wart ime consumption as

developed by the NonNuclear Ordnance Requirements process.

3. D i s c u s s i o n s with key personne l ( s u m m a r i z e d in

Appendix F ) and an a n a l y s i s of the systems t h a t use the re-

supply LPFs clearly identified that : (1) the CINC logis-

tics p l a n n e r is the pr i n c i p a l u s e r of t h e resupply LPFs to

develop and test the feasibility of OPLANS; (2) resupply

LPFs m u s t be in JOPS f o r m a t; e . g ., p ounds/man/ day or gal-

lons/un it/day by JOPS class/subclass of supply by Unit I~pe

Code ( UTC).
4. At the t ime of the i n t e r v i e w , n e i t h e r t h e Army

nor the A i r Force had a methodology for developing LPF5

which wo ul d be of use to t h e Navy . The Army has provided

d a t a for use by the Stud y G rou p in comparing the r e s u l t s of

t h e i r NSN to JOPS supply class and subclass classification

process w i t h t h a t pr ocess pr oposed h e r e i n .

5. For t h e CINC l o g i s t i c planner , th e JOPS

planning cycle b egins with the receipt of a force l i s t from
wh i ch the planne r develops the s u s t a i n i n g resupply movement
r e q u i r e m e n t s for the forces t h a t are called for in the
OPLAN . This force list specifies required units (ships,
a i r c r a f t squadrons , m o b i l e u n i t s, and Advanced Base

Functional Components (ABFC)) which are t ime

113

- -------- _ - -- ---,-- - - -- _-
~~~~~ ---- --- - -~~ -~~ - - -~~~~-- ~~ -- -
 -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

phased and i d e n t i f i e d by d e s t i n a t i o n in t h e o b j e c t i v e

t h e a te r . These u n i t s are expressed in terms of UTCs which

are notional planning units. Then , using LPF s the MRG

module of the JOPS develops resupply movement r e q u i r e m en t s

by JOPS class/subclass of supply (see Appendix C) . Table
II ] . provides a conceptual i l l u s t r a t i o n of t h e Fleet

Logistic Planners force list.

Table 111
FLEET LOGISTIC PLANNERS FORCE LIST

PLANNER S FO R CE LIST
I SHIPS

LIiIt TYP F TIME PHASED DESTINATIONS

1
I
cv
CG
CARRIER
CRUISER
I FFG ESCORT
DO DESTR OY ER
S AIRC R AFT
IXf UNIT T YPE
~
F-1 FIGHTER SQUADRON
~
\ P3 PATROL SQUADRO N

DE V ELOP RESUP P L Y
\ S ADVANCE BASE FUNCTIONAL COMPONENT

I M OBI LE UNITS
MOVEMENT REQUI REMENTS
B Y USE O F LPFS I N
JOPS RELATED STRUCTURE ______________________________________________________________

B. Identification of a Methodology

1. General. The foundation of v a l i d p l a n n i n g

factors is good usage data. Therefore, the Study Group

undertook to first define a methodology of collection and

114

_1
~
~~ -~~~~ - - -~~~~-
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ ___ _ -
analysis of historical supply consumption by individual unit
as i d e n t i f i e d by Unit I d e n t i f i c a t i o n Code (UI C ) which could
be aggregated i n t o JOPS class/ subclass of supply.

S i m i l a r l y , personnel data for each UIC was i de n t i f i e d as t h e

second basic element of factor cal c ul a t i o n .

I

2. Consumption C l a s s i f i c a t i o n ( le s s Ammunition ,
Class V) . Although Fleet logistics planners must develop
the Pl anning Factors f i l e ( P F F ) of the JOPS MRG with inputs
in pounds/ma n/day , gallons/man/ d ay , pounds/ unit/day or

g a l l o n s/ u n i t/ d a y i d e n t i f i e d to t h e JOPS p l a n n i n g

c l a s s/ s u b c l a s s of supply , i t becan e r e a d i l y apparent that no

usage data collection system w i t h i n t he Na vy i d e n t i f i e d

consumption for most i t e m s in t h i s s t r u c t u r e . The

exceptions to this situation are Subsistence (Class I) and

Personal Demand Items (Class VI) which are tracked by the

Navy Supply Systems Command ( NAVSUP) and Bulk POL (Class
I I I ) wh ich is tracked by NARDAC. With the above exceptions
the Navy i n v e n t ory is managed and rep orted by Nation al Stock
Number ( NSN) i n combination with a technical Cognizance
Symbol. The NSN is formed by combining the four d i g i t

Federal Suppl y Class ( F S C ) , a r e l a t i ve ly homogeneou s area of

commodities in respect to t h e i r physical or p e r f o rmance

characteristics , with the nine digit National Item

I d e n t i f i c a t i o n Numbe r ( N U N ) . This union f o rm s the

115
______________________________________ - -

t h i r t e e n d i g i t NSN. In the Navy each NSN is prefixed by the

two d i g i t Cognizance Symbol , wh i ch i d e n t i f i e s t e c h n i c a l and

f i n a n c i a l management r e s pon s i b i l i t y w i t h i n the Navy .

Therefore, in order to compute r e s u p p l y LPF5 for other t h a n

Subsistence (Class I ) , Bulk POL ( C l a s s I I I ) , A m m u n i t i o n

(Class V ) , and Personal Demand Items (Class V I ) , a method

had to be established which would both c l a s s i f y Navy NSN 5

i n t o JOPS class/ subclasses of supply and also i de n t i f y NSN

consumption to a UTC by c l a s s of suppl y by t i m e period.

Conceptually , the aggregation problem is il l u s t r a t e d in

Table 112 .

To deve l op a successful so lution to t h i s aggregation

probl em , t h e Stud y Group undertook a search for elements of

commonality within the Navy supply management system t h a t
m i g h t r e l a t e a given NSN to a JOPS p l a n n i n g class. Since a
manual identification to JOPS subclass of each of the
1, 200 ,000 Navy i n t e r e s t NSN items , s i m i l a r to the process
apparently performe d by t h e Army , woul d require s i g n i f i c a n t
resources and t une , a me t hodology r e l i a n t on modern coin
p u t e r i z e d resources was s o u g h t . A n a l y s i s of the s t r u c t u r e

of the FSC , t h e f i r s t four d i g i t s of the NSN , i n d i c a t e d t h a t

all m a t e r i e l is assigned to one of seventyseve n groups

which are further subdivided into 605 classes. Each class
covers a r e l a t i v ely homogeneou s area of commodities which
are classified with respect to: either (1) physical or

performance characterisitics ; or (2) the items included

11 6

k. ~~~~~~~ ~~ -- ~~~~--- ~~~~~~~~ -

~

Table 112

CONCEPTUAL AGGR E GATION PROBLEM

SUPPLY CLASS 10 0PL&~

PLANNING
SUPPLY SUBCLASS 34

SUPPLY
MANAGEIEN1
~

TOTAL ~SNs l~2OO,O00

LINE ITEM CONSU PTION 3Y UTC
NOTE : The base of the triang le r.pr .s.nts lin e item oensump tion ,
by DTC , of the total number of NSNs of Navy inter est,
approximatuly 1,200 ,000 items.
The inner tr iangl, symbo lizes t
he
~~eLlsubclasses
by UTC to one of the thi rty-four .7055
up of line i tems
of sup-
p ly

t h e r e i n are suc h as are usually r eq u i s i t i o n e d or issued

together; or ( 3 ) the i t e m s c o n s t i t u t e a related grouping for
supply management purposes.
Based on t h i s a n a l y s i s a two dimensional matrix was

formed t h a t c l a s s i f i e d FSCs i n t o JOPS c l a s s/ s u b c l a s s of

supply. The c l a s s i f i c a t i o n procedure was based on t h e

r e l a t i o n s h i p of item s d e f i n e d as being w i t h i n an FSC

c o r r e l a t e d with the definitions given for each of the JOPS

117

-- -
class/ subclasses of supply. A n a l y s i s of t h i s m a t r i x
resulted in the f o l l o w i n g conclusions: ( 1) ma ny FSC5 can

be categorized d i r e c t l y i n t o a JOPS c l a s s/ s u b c l a s s of

supply; and ( 2 ) the i t e m s w i t h i n some FSCS are not

homogeneous; i . e . , c e r t a i n FSC5 c o n ta i n a wide spectrum of

items, such that one FSC correlates with more than one JOPS
c l a s s/ s u b c l a s s of supply. T h i s s i t u a t i o n was p a r t i c u l a r l y

prevalent f o r Base Support M a t e r i e l (Class I I ) , Major End

I te ms ( C l a s s V I I ) , and R e p a i r P a r t s and Components (Class

IX ) and v e r i f i e d the need for f u r t h er s t r a t i f i c a t i o n beyond

s imple FSC i d e n t i f i c a t i o n . It was then h y pot h e s i z e d t h a t

the Navy Cognizance Symbo l migh t be the key to

classification of those FSCS which apply to more than one
JOPS class/ s ubclass of supply .

In order to test t h i s hypothesis, t h e Stud y Grou p an-

alyzed FSCs wh ich appeared to be problems. An example is

FSC 5820 , Radio and Television Communications Equipuent ,
except airborne. With the aid of a p r i n t o u t provided by t h e
Navy Ships Parts Control Center (SPCC), a breakdown of all
the Cognizance Symbols contained in FSC 5820 was obtained
along w i t h the number of items managed w i t h i n each Cogni-
zance Symbol.
W i t h i n FSC 5820 t h e r e are t h i r t e e n d i s t i n c t Cognizance
Symbols and 6658 NSN items managed by SPCC . Based on t h i s

i n f o r m a t i o n c a teg o r i z a t i o n of FSC 5820 d i r e c t l y into one

class/ subclass of supply is not f e a s i b l e pr i m a r i l y because

_ _ _ _ _
 major end items , JOPS Class VII, and repair parts and
components, JOPS Class IX , are combined together w i t h i n the
same FSC.
Next a review of the eightynine Navy Cogn izance Sym-
bols was conducted by the Stud y Grou p to determine to what
extent , if any , Cogn izance Symbols could be used to
categorize NSN 5 directly to JOPS class/ subclass of supply.
The results of this revi ew , sum marized in a matrix chart in
App endix G , indicate all but f i f t e e n Cognizance Symbols can
be i d e n t i f i e d directly to JOPS class/ s ubclass of supply .
This f i n d i n g was general ly corroborated by the Logistics
Reference Data , NAVMAT P4000 2 as reported i n Appendix E.
Further, analysis of these fifteen Cognizance Symbols
indicated t h a t if t h e y were to be used in combination w i t h
the FSC , JOPS classification apparently could be made. The
method of i d e n t i f i c a t i o n of NSNs to a JOPS class/ s ubclass
includes two cases. Case one is a direct correlation from
NSN to the JOPS class/subclass using the Navy Cogn izance
Symbol for those sixty-two Cognizance Symbols which appear
to relate directly. Case two, for the NSNs in the fifteen
Cognizance Symbols which apparently do not directly r e l a t e
to JOPS class/subclass, requires the additional step of
sorting by FSC to identify the JOPS class/subclass. An
example of t h i s c l a s s i f i c a t i o n is presented i n Table 11 3.

3. Consumption Data Bases. Hav i ng developed the

aggregation methodology , a search was conducted and

1:19

L ~~~ . - -
~~~~- - ~~~~~~~~~~ --- - - -
 Table 113

FSC ANAL YSI S

NO. OF JOPS
FSC 5820 COG #I TEMS SUBCLASS

SHIPBOARD REPAIR PARTS lH 3464 IXG

MAJOR SHIPBOARD ELEC . EQUIP. 2F 52 VIIG

SHIPBOARD ELEC . REPAIR PARTS 2H 85 IXG

AND CO MPONENTS

MAJOR SHIPBOARD MECH . EQUIP. 2S 4 VIIG

SRF MISSILE REPAIR PARTS 2U 16 IXL
SHORE (GROUND) ELEC. EQUIP. 2Z 707 VIIG

AIR ORDNANCE & ELEC . EQUIP. 4A 113 IXA

& ORDNANC E REPAIR PARTS
ELEC. PARTS & COMPONENTS 4G 2091 IXG

ELEC. PARTS & COMPONENTS 4N 110 IXG

FSM PART S & COMPONENT S 6A 3 IXM

AIR MI SS ILE REPAIR PART S 6E 7 IXL
GP ELEC . TEST EQUIPMENT 6G 3 IIB
FBM PARTS & COMPONENTS 6H 3 IXG
TOTAL 13 6658 6

11 10
appropriate data bases were i d e n t i f i e d which contain
consumption data comprehensive enough to assure the
computation of valid consumption rates . These data bases
are as follows:
a. Subsistence. The N avy Food Service Systems
Off ice (NFSSO), Washington, D.C., maintains current and corn
prehensiv e data incorporating consumption since 1968 by UIC .
This data will be u t i l i z e d to compute the subsistence (Class
I) LPFs.

b. Bulk POL. NA RDAC maintains bulk POL con

sumption data by UIC which will be utilized to compute Bulk
POL (Class III) LPFs.
c. Personal Demand Items. The Navy Resale
System Office (NRSO), Brooklyn, New York maintains data on
consumption of Personal Dema nd Items (Class VI) which will
be u t i l i z e d to compute LDFs.
d . Medical Materiel. The Naval Medical
Material Support Command (NAVMEct4ATSUPPCOM), Philadelphia ,
Pennsyl vania maintains current and comprehensive data on
consumption of medical materiel. This data can be related
to UTC and w i l l be u t il i z e d to compute medical m a t e r i e l
(Class VIII) LPF5.

e. Other Items less Ammunition (Class V) .

Although the data base maintained by the Navy I n v e n t o r y

Control P o i n t s ( ICPs) unde r the Un i fo rm Inventory Control
Point Program (U I CP ) in c l u d e s equ i pment related consumption
through the We apons System File and personnel oriented

Ilil
consumption through the Master Data F i l e , consumption of
Defense Logistics Agency (DLA ) managed items is not
includ ed . Additional ly , the cost of collecting and proces-
sing this partial information would have been significant.
Therefore the data base developed , collect ed , and m a i n t a i n e d
by the Department of Defense Materiel Distribution Study
Group (DOE*IDS)was reviewed to determine its applicability
to the requirements of LPF calculation. Analyses and
discussions held w i t h DODMDS representatives i d e n t i f i e d a
file that appears to satisfy the requirements. This file ,
Mini Ship I, forms the basis for the DO~ 4DS NSN aggregation.
The specific data elements in this file and general DODMDS
data base information are presented in Appendix H. While
the objectives of the DODMDS and Navy LPF studies are not
parallel , the original source data, as reflected in M i n i
Shi p I , r e f l ects wholesalelevel issue t r a n s a c t i o n s for a
twelve m onth periodi/ by FSC/NIIN identified to UIC .
The data also reflects i t e m catalog data such as d i m e n s i o n s,
we i g h t , and cube which are required . However , t h i s data
base does not include the Navy Cognizance Symbul required b
the aggregation methodology . ADP tapes which list Cogni
ance Symbol by NSN were determined to be available w i t h i n

1/ This file was selected by the Navy Logistics Planning

Factors Advisory Committee as the preferred source from
which to construc t a data base. Whether the twe lve month
period represents a complete r e q u i s i t i o n i n g picture or is
comprehensive cannot be determined at this t i m e . To assur e
currency of the LPFS in the future an updating procedure
w i l l have to be developed to m a i n t a i n data base c ur r e n c y .

11 12

_ .
-~~~~~~~~~~~
~ -- - - . ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

the Navy and easily compiled with the DODMDS data for
aggregation. Since the DODMDS data base includes the
necessary catalog data , i t w i l l be used where appr o p r i a t e to

provide both consumption and commodity c ha r a c t e r i s t i c s data

to develop LPFs for those JOPS class/subclasses of supply

r e q u i r i n g resupply p l a n n i n g f a c t o r s . (Se e Appendix D)

4. Personnel Data. Personnel data contained in

the Type U n i t D a t a File maintained at NA R DA~C will be used

f o r LPF c a l c u l a t i o n s .

5. Computational Method. The computational method

for the development of resupply LPFs for all JOPS classes of

supply excep t Ammunition (Class V) logically follows from

the aggregation methodology stated above ; i.e., the resupply

LPF , in its numerical form , is presen ted by JOPS cla s s/

subclass of supply by TJTC. Mathematically , the general

computational methodology for determination of pounds/man/-

day is reflected in Table 11 4.

Applica t ion of a Comba t In tensi ty Fac tor (CIF ) assumes

t ha t peace t ime consumption da t a w i l l be derived from t h e

data base . CIFs have been developed by the Navy and

approved by OSD for the Navy s secondary item requirements
and budget development. These factors are based on the
r a t i o between combat s t ea mi n g day s and p e a c e t i me s t ea mi n g

day s for ships and on the r a t i o b e t w e e n p e a c e t i m e f l y i n g

h o u r s and combat f l y i n g hours f o r a i r c r a f t model/

configurations. An a lysis and development of CIFs will

1113
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _
- -

Table 114

GENERAL LPF COMPUTATION

(1) CW = (C~ x CIF x W )

NSN

(2) CW = CW (By Subclass of S uppl y )

OTC NSN
i~ l
CW
(3) LPF =
UTC (By Subclass of Supply)
360 (Mr )

where:
C~, = Peacetime c o n s umpt i o n for one year i n
uni ts of issue of each NSN for all UICs
notionalized to UTC
CIF = Combat I n t e n s i t y Factor

n = All NSN items identified to a subclass of

suppl y
W = We ight of the NSN unit of issue

M~ = Number of personnel assigne d to the UTC

CW Weight of the NSN unit consumed in
NSN =
war tim e

CW
UTC = Wei gh t of the NSN units consumed ~~~
UTC/ su b class
LPF = Logistics Planning Factor

be accomplished in Phase II as necessary.

6. Ammunition. Peacetime consumption data are

not used or applicable to ammunition requirements.

A m m u n i t i o n requirements are based upon DOD budget and

procurement guidance, and technical ordnance engineering

requirements. The NNOR process e s t i m a t e s a mm u n i t i o n combat

1114
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -- ~~ -- _ - - .-.-~ - - - --

develop a methodology for a d a p t i n g th e NNOR process to the

JOPS . The methodology for determining the Class V LPFs will

be developed in Phase II of this study.

7. NonMili tary Materiel. OPLAN S do not require

Navy resupply of materiel to support such nonmilita ry

programs as agricultural and economic development (Class X).

1115

L
- -~~~~~ - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

III. FINDINGS

Based on the analysis conducted during Phase I of the

stud y of Navy LPFs , the Stud y Group has found tha t:

JOPS is a JCS sponsored system , and it is i n c u m b e n t

up on the Navy to be responsive to it and develop procedures
to meet its requirements as well as to fulfill the Navy s
own resupply and transportation needs .

A u t h o r i t a t i v e Navy LPFs must be a v a i l a b l e and

maintained .

The Fleet CINCs r e q u i r e valid r e s u p p l y LPFs for de-

velop ing the Planning Factors File of the JOPS M~~ . CINC5
currently use Table 1.5 of Logistics Reference Data, NAVMAT
P40002 as the major data source.

There is i n s u f f i c i e n t d e t a il in the n a r r a t i v e
describing the resupply LPFs contained in Table 1.5 of
Logistics Reference Data, NAVMAT P40002 to permit
reconstruction or validation of the LPFs.

NAVMEII4ATSUPP COM , NRSO , and NFSSO do c a l c u l a t e and

maintain valid planning factors for Medical Materiel (Class

V II I ), Personal Demand Items (Class VI ), and Subsistence
(Class I).

At the time of the interviews neither the Army nor

the USAF had developed a methodology which could be
adaptable to Navy use.

Since r e q u i r e m e n t s are not based on p eacetime

demand , a separate methodology will be r e q u i r e d to i n t e r f a c e

hI i

~~ -~~~~~~-
~

a m m u n i t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s, as d e t e r m i n e d in the N o n N u c l e a r

Ordnance Requirements (NNOR) process, with the JOPS .

Materiel to supp ort nonmilitary pr ograms ( C l a s s X )

is not pertinent to this study .

The p e r t i n e n t table w i t h i n Logistics Reference Data ,

NAVMAT P40002 , to wh i ch the new methodology will apply , is

Table 1.5, Consumption Data for Supply Categories of

Materiel.

Table 1.5 of Logistics Reference Data, NAVMAT

P40002 and the resupply LPFS therein need to be revised and

reformatted for JOPS MPG input according to the requirements
of Fleet logistics planners.

JOPS requires the reporting of resupply consumption

on the basis of pounds/man/ day , gallons/man/ day ,
pounds/un i t/day , or gallons/unit/ day .

The methodology as deve loped by the Study Group ap-

pears to provide a vi able me thod to classify Navy interest
items into JOPS class/ subclass of supply used in OPLA N an-
alyses.

CIFs and theater adjustment mult ipliers (LANT , PAC,

e t c . ) need to be considered f u r t h e r .

1112

-. _ - - -
~~~
 _ _ _ _ _ _
__ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

IV. RECOMMENDATIONS

The Study Group recommends t h a t :

The NFSSO data base be used to compute Subsistence

(Class I) consumption factors. (Continuing action).

The NARDAC POL data base be used to compute Bulk POL

(Class III) consumption factors. (Continuing Group Ac-

tion ).

The NRSO data be used to compute consumption factors

for Personal Demand Item s (Class VI). (Continuing action).

The NAVME~ 4ATSUPPCOM data base be used to compute

consumption factors for medical materiel (Class VIII).

(Continuing Action).

The DO~14DS data base, as id en t i f i e d h e r e i n , be used

to compute Navy consumption factors f o r Base Support Mate-

r i e l ( C l a s s I I ) , Packaged Petroleum Products (Class III),

Construction M a t e r i e l (C l a s s I V ) , Major End I t e m s ( C l a s s

VII), and Repair Parts and Components (Class I X ) . (Stud y

Group A c t i o n ) .

Me thodology be developed which will interface Ammu-

nition (Class V) requirements , as determined in the NN O R
process, wi th JOPS . (Study Group Action).

Materiel to support nonmilitary programs (Class X)

not be addressed in this study.

Rules and procedures be developed and documented

that provide for the maintenance of the resuppl y LPFs.

(Study Group Action).

V-i

_ _ -~~~~~ ~~~~~~ -- ~~~

- - -- __
~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
.
_ _ _ _
- -- -- -- - -- -- - -- - - -- - --- ----
-
-
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~

A n a l y s i s and development , as necessary , of CIFs is

required. (Study Group Action).

An appropriate fo r m a t be developed to d i s s e mi n a t e
new official Navy LPFs . (Study Group Action ).
 ~~~~~~ ~~ -- - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

AP PE NDIX A

ST UDY DIRECTIVE

I I

-
I
~i

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 --- - . ~~~~~~~ - -- -- ~~~~ -- - - -~~~~~~~~~~ - - -~~~~~~~~~ - -----
~~~

-
c:
~~~~~

From :
To:
D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E
OFFICE OF T HE CHIEF OF N A V A L
WAS HINGTON. DC .

Chief of Naval Operations

Distribution Lis t
Z0350
NAVY
O P E R A TIO N S

Ser 401/219311
~ REPLy REFER

~
0

Subj : Study Directive for an Analysis of Navy Logistic

Plannin g Fac tors
Ref : (a) Joint Operation Planning System (JOPS) , Vols I
and I I I
(b) Navy Inspector General Repor t o f Inspec tion of
CINCPACFLT 7-17 Sep 1976 , Recommendation 414/76

End : (1) Guidance for CNO Studies and Analyses

(2) Manning Requirements for the Analysis of Navy
Lo gistic Planning Factors
1. Title. Analysis of Navy Logistic Planning Factors
2. Type . CNO in-house study w i t h contractor support.

3. Background. This study is being conducted at the request

of the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Logistics under
the CNO Study Program. Logistic planning factors are essential
tools to the Navy s opera tion p lannin g and lo g istic sup port
(resupply) functions. Logistic planning factors are necessary
for :

o F u l f i l l i ng the Navy s logistic plannin g responsi

bilities under the Joint Operation Planning System
(JOPS). The JOPS is a major planning system
es tablished by the J CS an d is a standard applica tion
pro gram of the World Wide Mili tary Command and
Control System (WWMCCS). Reference (a) describes
the system .

o Supporting the Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan

(JSCP) .

o Determining War Reserve Material Requirements (WRMR) .

o Supporting the personnel replacement, material re
supply, an d indus trial mo b iliza tion base required for
OPLANS.

A-2 Appendix A
 -~~ - ~~
-- - - - - -- -
~~~~~~~~~~~
- - - -
~~~
-- - - - - -
~~~~~~

~~~~~~
-- - - ---
~~~

-
p

Ser 401/
Sub j: Study Directive for an Analysis of Navy Logistic
Plannin g Fac tors
a. Logistic Planning Factors are used by Fleet CINCs ,
OPNAV , NAVMAT and the Systems Commands in logistics support
planning and industrial mobilization planning . Existing logis-
tic planning factor tables have not been reviewed in depth for
several years . They have , therefore , lost their credibility .
As a result , budget requests for WRMR have been reduced or
rejected. Reference (b) recommends corrective action to
improve credibility of OPLANS and related WRMR. This will
be addressed during this study .

b. The rationale and methodology used in the orig inal

development of many of the logistic planning factors were
never recorded , date back to the early period of the Vietnam
war or earlier , and have not been validated for several years.
New weapons systems , changing modes of transportation , and
the increasingly tight controls over military spending and
control of same , need to be f u l l y taken into consideration in
the rationale used in validating or developing logistic plan-
ning factors .
4. Objective. The study will identify and record existing
rationale and methodology , and as appropriate , develop new
rationale and methodologies by which logistic planning factors
are structured , so that logistic plan s , requirements and budge ts
using these factors will be more credible and supportable
to higher authority. The results of this study will be incorp-
orated into the Logistic Annex of the Joint Strategic Capabili-
ties Plan (JSCP) ; the Logistics Factors File (LFF) of the Joint
Operation Planning System (JOPS); and the Navy publication
NAVMAT P 40002 , Navy Logistics Reference Data.

5. Specific Guidance

a. The study should conduct a critical examination of

all Navy logistic planning factors . Validity , credibility ,
and supporting rationale and methodology are the prime con-
siderations in this examination . Emphasis should be placed
on those factors required for the Logistic Factors File (LFF )
of the Movement Requirements Generator Sub-System of the JOPS .
This is needed so that the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS) will
have validated logistic planning factors for inclusion in
the Logistic Annex of the FY 1978 JSCP .

b. The study should include a detailed look at the

existing rationale and methodology behind each planning factor ,

A-3

- - - _ _ _ _ _
 Ser 401/
Subj : Study Directive for an Analysis of Navy Logistic
Planning Factors
if any , and make a determination as to its reliability and
applicability to present day needs . The other services should
be visited to determine if their rationale and methodology
would apply to Navy use. The study will develop new or
revised rationale and methodologies in order to provide vali-
dated planning factors in the future .
c. Each system (manual or automated) which makes use of
logistic planning factors should be identified and its in-
volvemen t, scope , theater of operations , validity , overlap
with other sys tems , and its operational condition should be
defined . The usefulness of each system should be determined
and recommendations prepared for future changes and/or
development necessary to provide a total , responsive system
to suppo rt the Navy s requirements .

d. The study should ensure that the preparation , use ,

and reportin g of lo gistic plannin g factors by field activities
have been thoroughly investigated and responsible Command
personnel interviewed. This should supply the necessary in-
formation for validating existing logistic plrnning factors
including changes and deletions and making recommendations
for the development of new planning factors .

6. Coordination and Review.

a. The Study Sponsor is OP04 .

b. The CNO Project O f f i c e r is Mr. B. Gruber, OP-40 1G ,
6955109.

c. An Advisory Committee , chaired by the Deputy Chief

of Naval Operations (Logistics ) OP-04,is established .
Members will include representatives of OPOl , OP06 , OP-90 ,
OP96 , and Chief of Naval Material. The Commandant , Marine
Corps , is invited to participate. Other OPNAV Deputy Chiefs ,
the Chief of Naval Personnel, Chief , Bureau of Medicine and
Surgery , Commander Naval Sea Systems Command , Commander ,
Naval Supply Systems Command , Commander , Naval Air Sys tems
Command , and Commander , Naval Electronics Systems Command will
be requested to designate representatives to attend Advisory
Committee meetings upon invitation of the Chairman , or the
Chief of Naval Material as appropriate. It is requested
that each organization represented on the Advisory Committee
designate a point of contact to the Project Officer within

A- 4
 Ser 401/

S ubj : Study Directive for an Analysis of Navy Logistic

Planning Factors
ten days from the date of this directive , and the Chief of
Naval Material will designate points of contact from the
Systems Commands . The President , CNA , is invited to attend
Advisory Committee meetings .
d. A study group consisting of members of appropriate
OPNAV , NAVMAT , Marine Corps , and BUMED Staffs chaired by the
Project Officer , will participate in the conduct of this
study on a part-time basis . Study Group membership is desig-
nated in enclosure (2) .
e. The Directo r, Systems Analysis Division (OP 96), shall
conduct a technical review to monitor progress and ensure
quality of the study . During the course of the study , this
effort shall include review of working papers and reports for
validity and completeness and an independent technical evalua-
tion of the final report. (See guidance contained in enclosure
(1).) Results of the review shall be promulgated to the Ad-
visory Commi ttee and the CNO Project Officer by OP96.
f. LCDR John Sewell , SC, USN , is designated OP-96 Study
Monitor.

7. Reporting . -

a. The study plan is to be submitted to the Advisory

Committee within four weeks of the date of this directive .

b. The Project Officer will submi t progress reports to

OP966 in accordance with current directives .
c. Meetings of the Advisory Committee shall be called
by the Chairman at appropriate times to review and evaluate
study progress and trends . The committee shall meet at least
once each quarter.
d. Working papers will be submitted to the Advisory
Committee as they become available . A draft of the final
report is to be submitted by 31 August 1977.

/
~- ~/10HN D. C~~~
~,
Distribution: (see page 5)
7
(~~/ 0pr
/ ~~~~~~~~ ~~
gn
at :a.i~i
~ (
I.gi~~ )

A-S

L -_ _ _
r - -
~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---- -- --- -
~~
- -- -
~~
- - ---- - - - - - -- ----
~~
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Ser 40 1/

Subj : Study Directive for an Analysis of Navy Logistic

Planning Factors

Dis tribu tion :

OP-Ol
OP04
OP 06
OP90
OP 96
CNA
CMC
CHNAVMAT

Copy to:
C INCLANTFL T
C INCPACPLT
CINCUSNAVEUR
COMNAVAI RS Y SCOM
COMNAVE L E X SY SCOM
COMNAVFAC E NGCOM
COMNAVS EASYSCOM
COMNAVSUPSY SCOM
COMSC
BUMED
CHNAVPERS
OPU 5
OP- 942
OP-964
OP 966

A- 6
 GUI DAN CE FOR CNO STUDIE S AND ANALYSES

1. The assumptions which are of great importance to the

outcome of the analysis shall be clearly stated in the
introduction to the report. Also , at the beginning of
each chapter , annex , or appendix , the complete set of
assumptions which are applicable shall be listed . The
analysis shall determine the effects of alternative as-
sumptions when these are critical to the study results .
2. The analysis shall identify the key parameters (weapons
systems effectiveness values , cos tin g techniques ) which
greatly affect the study results . Best estimates shall be
used for the values of these parameters ; in addition , grea ter
and lesser values spanning the range of reasonable values
for each parameter shall be used to determine the sensitivity
of the study results to changes in these key parameters .

3. A clear and concise description of each model or simula-

tion shall be included in an appendix to the report unless
such description is available in an already published docu-
ment and is referenced in the report . This description
shall explain in qualitative terms (including a logic dia-
gram) the general methodology which provides the basis for
the model. Detailed design specifications for each model ,
or reference to a permanent OPNAV file in which these design
specifications are held , shall be included in the permanent
files of this study .

EN CL (1) TO CN O SER 401/219311 of 7 Apr 1977

A-7 Enclosure (1)

-~~~~--- --- -- ~
- - - - ------ -
 I
MANNING REQU IREMENTS FOR THE ANALYSIS
OF NAVY LOGISTI C PLANNIN G FACTORS
PROGRAN STUDY

1. General

a. Personnel assigned to the Study Group should have

general or specific responsibilities for Navy logisitc plan-
fling factors , and should also be cognizant of the methodology
for de termination and r ationale of p lannin g fac tor re quire-
ments. Each representative will be responsible for keeping
his parent command informed of the progress of the study and
making the view of his parent commaid known to the study
Project Officer.

b. It is appreciated that personnel having the above

qualifications will be involved in other aspects of the over-
all logistics/supply system . The level of effort required
of Study Group members will therefore be limited to part
time participation , probably not exceeding 15% of their time
(with the exception of the NARDAC representative , who will
probably be required about 25% of the study time) .

2. Composition

Organization Rank Specialty

OP-Ol LCDR/CDR Manpower/Personnel

Civ . Equiv . Analyst
OP-04 (OP40) GS-14 CNO Project Officer

OP-04 (OP-4l) LCDR/CDR Logistics Analyst/

Civ. Equiv. Mobilization Planner
OP-06 (OP 605) LCDR/CDR Analyst
Civ. Equiv .

CMC MAJOR/CAPT Analyst

Civ. Equiv .

Navy Regional Data LCDR/CDR ADP Systems Analyst

Au toma tion Center , Civ . Equiv .
Washington (NARDAC )

OP-96 (OP-964) LCDR/CDR Study Monitor

Civ . Equiv .

NAVNAT 04 LCDR/CDR Logistics Analyst

Civ. Equiv .

A-8
ENCL (2) TO CNO SER 401/291311 of 7 Apr 1977 Enclosure (2)

~~~ - -
 -- - --- ----- -- -.-- --
_ _ _ _
_
_
_ _ - ,-
--- - -~~ -.-- ~~~~~~~ ~~
-

NAVAIR LCDR/CDR Logistics Planners

Civ. Equiv.
NAVELEX L CDR/ CDR Logis tics Planners
Civ . Equiv .

NAVFAC LCDR/CDR Logistics Planners

Civ . Equiv .
NAVSEA LCDR/CDR Logistics Planners
Civ. Equiv.
NAVSUP LCDR/CDR Logistics Planners
Civ . Equiv .
BUMED LCDR/CDR Logistics Planners
Civ. Equiv.

3. Reporting . All personnel shall report by telephone to

the CNO Project Officer (695-5109) not later than ten days
from the date of this directive .

Note : Subsequent to the initial meeting of the Study Group ,

minor adjustments may be made to incur an optimum balance of
personnel assigned .

Enclosure (2)

- --- ----- - .--- - . - - .-- - - - - - --- - --- .-

------- ~~ ~~~~ ~~
_ _ _ _ _ __ __ __ __ __ _
__ _
_ _
_ _
_ _
_ _ _ _
-
_ _- -

APPENDI X B

STU DY P LAN

_ _ _ ~~~~~~~~ - -, --- - - ~~~~~ - - -. - - - - - - - - -- _- - - ---- - -- --_ _ _ _

 - -.- -. - ~~~~~~~
-

Stud y Plan for an Analysis of Navy Logistic Planning Factors

Re f : (a ) St udy Direc t ive , Ser 40 1/2193 11 , dated 7 Ap r i l

1977

1. Tasks
a. Task 1. I d e n t i f y and review au toma te d an d manual
sys t~ ns curren tly used in d evelop ing , reporting , and
utilizing Navy logistic planning factors.

(1) Subtask 11 . Conduct a search to ascertain

those au toma ted an d manual sys tems curren tly used in de-
veloping, reporting, and utilizin g Navy logistic planning
factors.

(2) Subtask 12. Interv iew key personnel involved

in subtask 1-1 to determine the suitability of current Navy
logistic planning factors in providing data required for
operational planning .

b. Task 2. Identify, acquire , and categorize data

concerning exis ting Navy logistic planning factors.

(1) Subtask 21 . Identify and acquire those Navy

logistic planning factors utilized in the Planning Factors
File (PFF) of the Joint Operating Planning System (JOPS III)
Movemen t Requirements Generator (MRG).

(2) Subtask 22. Compare those Navy logistic

p l a n n i n g f a c t o r s i d e n t i f i e d in subtask 21 with those
utilized in industrial mobilization planning and in the War
Reserve Ma terial Requirements (WRMR) .

(3) Subtask 23. Catalog Navy logistic planning

f a c t o r s according to use and applicability.
c. Task 3. Review and a n a l y ze each Navy l o g i s t i c
planning factor category for supporting rationale , devel-
opmental methodology , validity , and credibility.

(1) Subtask 31 . Interview key logistic personnel

to determine rationale and development methodology used to
compile the existing Navy logistic planning factors.
(2) Subtask 32. Int e r v i e w key p l a n n i n g personnel
to determine the validity and credibility of the existing
Navy logistic planning factors.

(3) Subtask 33. Identify those Navy logistic

planning factors requiring redefinition or revision , and
those logistic areas in wh ich no planning factors are
available.
B2

.-
---~~~~~ ~~~ -- - - --- ~- - -
_ _ _ _ _ --- . -- ---
 (4) Subtask 34. Prepare a work i ng paper
consolidating findings of - these tasks.
d. Task 4. Prepare a draft final report incorporating
the findings of the three tasks and recommending futur e
courses of a c t i o n . Included in the r e p or t shall be the
following :

(1) The rationale and methodology used in

developing e x i s t i n g Navy l o g i s t i c pl anning f a c t o r s, the
v a l i d i t y and c r e d i b i l i t y of t h a t r a t i o n a l e and me tho dology ,
and recommendations for change s and justification thereof.

(2) The usefulness , completeness , and s t a t u s of

existing automated and manned systems for developing ,
repo r t i n g , and u s i n g Navy lo gi s t i c planning f a c t o r s , an d
recommendations for design , development , and implementation
of a new system , if required , t o f u l l y support Navy logistic
planning requirements for JOPS III, in du s t r i a l m ob i l i z a t i o n,
an d t h e WRMR , and to respond to variations in planning
scenarios based on the DPPG and JSCP .

(3) The Navy logistic planning factors that are

valid and applicable as they now exist , those that need
e l i m i n a t ion or revision , and a d d i t i o n a l f a c t o r s t h a t need to
be deve loped .

(4) Recommendations as to the leve l of detail to

which Navy logistic plann ing should be addressed with
respect to variou s objective s, i.e. , gross level by supply
class for transportation planning versus detailed level by
stock n umbe r for t h e WRMR. I n c l u d e d shall be
recommenda tions for the deve lopment of new computational
methodologies for these situations.

(5) The adequacy of NAVMAT P40002, and

recommenda tions for ch anges/additions/deletions to improve
its usefulness.

This draft report will be placed in final form after

comments from all involved parties have been reviewed and
incorporated into the report. Subsequently , presentation
material , as requr ied , shal l be prepared for breifing of
concerned Navy p e r s o n n e l .

2. Scope and Depth. The study will encompass a survey of

current systems utilizing Navy logistic planning factors, a
detailed inspection of the rationale and methodology used in
developing t h e e x i s t i n g f a c t o r s , and a determination of
their validity and applicability to present and future
needs . Based on the finding s of the study , recommendations
will be drafted indicating those factors wh ich are valid and
B3
 - - - - -- -
- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~

applicable for current and futur e planning , those which

shoul d be e l i m i n a t e d or revised , and the r e q u i r e m e n t s for
development of additional factors.
3. Manpower Allocation. Tasks 1 through 4 will require the
servfces of the project officer and contractor support. The
projected level of contractor support is approximately 15
manmonths of effort extending over a period of 10 months.

Study Group members , being experts in their respect ive

areas, will be called upon to provide inputs to the study
within their areas of expertise relative to the planning
factors and the method of computation.
The CNO Project O f f i c e r w i l l pr ovide i n i t i a l points of
contact for contractor information. The Ad visory Committee
will review the working pape r and reports and will review
and evaluate study progress and findings.

4. Fundin~ Allocation. Information Spectrum , Inc. w i l l

support t h i s study under ONR Contract Number
N 0 00 1476C 1l30 as expanded tasks to that contract.
Approximate funding is $56 ,931.00 for accomplishment of
tasks 1 t h r o u g h 4 by I n f o r ma t i o n Spectrum , Inc. and
$3 ,069.00 to be retained for travel of N avy Personnel.
Included in the $56,931.00 is $5 ,533.00 for trave l of
contractor personnel to Norfolk , VA., Honolulu , H awaii ,
Stuttgart , Germa ny , London , UK ., For t Lee , VA. , and
Wr ightPatterson AFB , Ohio.

5. Other Resources. Trave l will be required to Norfolk ,

London, Honolulu , and Stuttgart to intervi ew CINC personnel
regarding the rationale and methodology used in deve lop ing
t h e i r f a c t o r s , their validity and their utilization for
planning . A~.ay personnel at Fort Lee and U SAF personnel at
~Jr ightPatterson AFB will be intervi ewed to ascertain the
rationale and methc-dology used in develop ing their factors,
and possible interface with the Navy .
6. Task Schedule.
a. Contractor on board : 2 Mar 1977
b . Study Direct ive Signed : 7 Apr 1977
c. Study Plan appro v a l : 22 Apr 1977
d. Task 1: 15 Jul 1977
e. Task 2: 15 Jul 1977
f. Task 3: 15 Jul 1977
g. Draft final report : 31 Aug 1977
h. Complete f i n a l r e por t : 30 Nov 1977
i. Prepare presentation m a t e r i a l : 30 Dec 1977

B-4
~ - - -- -- - - --
- - -------- - - -- - ---- - - - -
- ~~ ~~~~

I
7. Specific Guidance. The pr ima ry purpose of the study is
to determine whether e x i s t i n g N avy logistic planning factors
are sufficiently valid and credible for inclusion in the
Logistic Annex of t h e FY 78 J o i n t S t r a t eg i c Capabilities
Plan ( J Sc P ) . To ensure the v a l i d i t y and c r e d i b i l i t y of
these factors, the study shall:
a. Conduct a c r i t i c a l e x a m i n a t i o n of all logistic
planning factors. Validity , credibility , and supporting
rationale and methodology shall be the pr ime considerations
in the examination. Emphasis shal l be placed on those
factors contained in the P l an n i n g Factors File (PFF) of the
Join t Operations Planning System (JOPS III) Movement
R e q u i r e m e n t s Generator (MRG).
b. Inclu d e a s c r u t i n y of the r a t i o n a l e and development
methodology for these factors, and determination shall be
made as to t h e i r r e l i a b i l i t y and a p p l i c a b i l i t y to pr esent
and f u t u r e needs . A recommendation for the development of
new or revised r a t i o n a l e and methodology procedures which
w i l l ensure the provision of v a l i d a t e d factors in the f u t u r e
shall be made.
c. Identify each automated and manual system using Navy
logistic planning factors and define its involvemen t, scop e ,
operational area , validity, overlap with other systems, and
operational condition. The u s e f ul n e s s of each system shal l
be determined and recommendation s made for changes or
development necessazy to provide a total , responsive system
to support Navy s f u t u r e r e q u i r e m e n t s .
d. Ensure t h a t all field act ivities providing or using
Navy l o g i s t ic p l a n n i n g f a c t o r s are thoroughly i n v e s t i g a t e d
and key personnel intervi ewed to ensure adequate data for
validating or revising existing factors and for basing
recommendations for the development of new f a c t o r s .
e. Due to recent DOD changes in logistic guidance ,
consideration should be given to the level of planning
necessary for JOPS r e l a t i v e to industrial mobilization and
the WRMR , and whether the leve l of detail r eq u i r e d for
supply and procurement is compatible with these plans.
8. Methodology . The a n a l y t i c a l methods to be used in t h i s
s t u d y include document search , i n t e r v i ew s, m a t r i x
tabulations , model reviews , categorizing , and reporting .
9. Effectiveness Criteria. Not applicable.

B-5
10. Reports.

a. Progress reports shall be submitted to OP964 in

accordance w i t h OPNAVINST 5 0 0 0 . 3 0 .

b. Working paper shall be submitted upon completion of

Task 3.
C. D r a f t f i n a l r e por t shall be submitted for review and
comment.

d. Final report shall be submitted , after the draft has

been rev i ewed and commented upo n , incorporati ng the approved
comm e n t s .

e. Presentation material for use in briefing Navy

personnel shall be prepared and submitted upo n call.
11. Coordination. The study grou p shall coordinate with the
CNO Project O f f ic e r , t h e Advi so ry Committee , OP 96 St udy
Monitor , and other individuals/agencies as approptiate.

B6
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --- - -- -

APPENDIX C

- Brief Discussion of Joint Operation

-
P l a n n i n g System (JOPS )

- --
_ _
-_ - ~~-- -~~~~~~~~~~~ - ~~~ ----
- ~~ - - - -~~~~~~~~~~~~ - - - - - - -~~~~~~~~~~ - - - - ----- ~~~~~~

APPEND IX C

Brief Discussion of Joint Operation

Pl anning System (JOPS )
A. Background
As the standard model to provide responsive support for
operation planning , JOPS provides the operation planner a
wide rang e of automated analytical tools . The basic ob-
jective of the JOPS I I I ADP system is to list t h e
- - t imephased forces , f a c i l i t i e s, p ersonnel replacements,
materiel resupply and t r a n s por t a t i o n requirements needed to
support and s u s t a i n an operation plan , and to test the
feasibility of operation plans with regard to strategic

transportation.

In January 1972, the acquisition of new Worldwide

Military Command and Control System (WWMCCS) hardware was
approved r e q u i r i n g JOPS program development to conform to
WWMCCS hardware and software standards . The JOPS III
software is a hierarchial structure with the basic system

component being the routine/subroutine. Groups of

r o u t i n e s/ s u b r o u t i n e s form programs which , when logically
grou ped by f u n c t i o n , c o n s t i t u t e a module. The diagram on
the following page illustrates this information flow .
The JOPS III ADP Support System is divided into :
a. Software, containing application programs :

System Monitor (SM) ADP software supervisor of

the JOPS I I I application programs. Its prima ry purpose is

- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

to provide the user/machine interface between the pl anner

and the application software .

I ~~
L _. _.~~~~
~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ( Factor s
_ _ _ _ _

L! I (
~
PFDD
Di ~~~~~~~~~~ nq D(~
~~ _

1~ LI (r~~~ (
L.g.nd
DEPRE P - Deployment Reporting System
FRG - Force Requirements Generator
MPG Movement Requirements Generator
IT! Transpo r ta tion Feasibility Estima tor
TPFDO - Time Pha sed Farce Deployment Data
TPTRL - Time P h a s ed Transportation Requirements I .ist
TU
~ HA Type U n i t Characteristics

FI GURE C-l JOPS INFORMATION FLOW

Force Requirements Generator (F ~~ ) provides
the m i l i t ar y planner the c a p a b i l i t y to a u t o m a t ic a l l y gene-

r a t e and i n d iv i d u a l ly t a i l o r TimePhased Force and I n i t i a l

M a t e r ie l De ployment D a t a (TPFDD) to s u p p o r t j o i n t Operation

plans. The F~~ is unit oriented .

Movement Requirements Generator (MRG ) - provides

the capability to automatically generate both unit and

nonuni t related cargo and personnel requirements based

upo n the forces to be supported and the duration of the

planned operation by using resupply oriented Logistic Plan-

ning Factors (LPF).
C-3
 -- -
~~~~~-- ---
~~

Transportation Feasibility Estimator (TFE)

during the plans development, provides automated assistance

to the planner in evaluating the gross feasibility of an
OPLAN in terms of strategic movement. The strategic move-

ment includes forces (units) and their accompanying cargo as

well as the resupply cargo required to sustain those forces

for the d ur a t i o n of the contingency . Operation of the TFE
is dependent upo n transportation oriented LPF5 .

TPFDD/Interface (T/I) performs the primary

function of reformatting and summarizing data in the De-

ployme n t Data f i l e , as reported through the DEPREP system ,

to create the TPFDD file for processing by the FRG , MRG , and

the TFE programs. This program provides also the capability

to sort the TPFDD file, compute and analyze facility

workloa d s , and compute and analy ze the strategic lift

required, both a i r an d sea , to mo ve a force from

portofembarkation (POE) to port of debarkation (POD).

b. File Maintenance Programs

C. Data Base F i l e s

B. Movement Requirements Generator (MRG )

Resupply LPFs form an important basis as input to the

MRG as a part of the Planning Factor File (PFF). The MRG is

used to generate the timephased nonunit related personnel

and materiel requirements for an OPLAN .

C-4
 - - ---- - ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ -~~~ - ~~~~~~~~ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ---~~~ - - -~~~~~~~ - - -~~ - -- - - ~~ ~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~ -- - -~~ -- ~~~~~
- -

-~
-
These movement r e q u i r e m e n t s s pe c i f y the number of re-

placement personnel and am oun t of m a t e r i e l (depl oying

e q u i pm e n t , resuppl y cargo , supply buildup in country , and

retrograde) necessary to support the OPLAN within its stated
operation time frame . These M1~~generated movement re-
quirements in c o n j u n c t i o n with the FRGgen erated force re-
quirements comprise the total movement requirements of an
OPLAN.

The MRG application program updates the TPFDD file with

p orts of support and geolocation country codes for each
force r e q u i r e m e n t by e x t r a c t i n g t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n from the
Logistics Data (LOGDA ) file. This updated TPFDD file con-

tains the total movement requirements for an OPLPN. The

TPFDD file is then passed on to the TFE application program

for the t r a n s por t a t i o n s i m u l a t i o n of all movement re-

q u i r e m e n t s in the OPLAN .
The MRC is composed of six functional modules, as fol-
lows :

Module MlO Create/Update Planning Factors

Modul e Ml5 MRG File Paging

Module M20 Generate Movement R e q u i r e me n t s

Modul e M30 Aggregate n o n u n i t related cargo

requirements

Modul e M60 PFF Initialization/Master file

generation

Modul e M70 LOG DA F i l e Maintenance

C-5

- ~~~~~~~- -- - -j
 -

The above modules which are of main concern to the

study are t h e M10 , M2 0 , and M60 since each wo rk s w i t h

planning factor input. A b r i e f d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e com-

p o s i t i o n of each f o l l o w s :

Module M10
T h i s module provides t h e p l a n n e r w i t h

the c a p a b i l i t y to c o n s t r u c t t h e PFF which is needed to

g e n e r a t e n o n u n i t r e l a t e d movement r e q u i r e m e n t s . The PFF is

plan dependent in t h a t the p l a n n i n g parameters a r e

s t r u c t u r e d generally according to t h e scenario of the OPLA N

and how the movement requirements are to be generated. It

is in the PFF that the plannner states the MRG problem .
Planner i n p u t s wh i ch are applied to t h e PFF i n c l u d e t h e

following :

a. OP LAN d u r a t i on from D day (360day maximum )

b. Increm ents, or freq uency of movemen ts, for re-

supply , supply buildup, and personnel replacement , in terms

of days per i n c r e m e n t s pec i f i e d f o r up to four t i m e p e r i o d s

spread ove r the d u r a t i o n of the OPLAN.

c. Time periods d u r i n g wh i ch a percentag e of

nonPOL r e s u p p l y w i l l move by air spe c i f i e d by Service and

resuppl y category for up to twentyfour periods .

d. Percentage adjustment of U.S. personnel at-

trition factors to compensate for differing attrition rates

in offshore coun tries. *

*Off...shore: In theater, but n ot in ob jec t ive area c o u n t r y .

C-6
 e. U.S. personnel attrition factors specified by
Service.
f. Percentage d i s t r i bu t i o n of resupply and supply
b u i l d u p movement r e q u i r e m e n t s among up to t h r e e POE5

specified by Service and resuppl y category .

g. Supply b u i l d u p p olicy in terms of s t a r t day ,

d u r a t i o n of b u i l d u p period , and t a r g e t leve l ( d a y s of sup-

ply) specified by Service and resupply category.

h . Retrograd e cargo requirements and intracountry
cargo requirements, expressed as a percentage of resupply
cargo throughou t specified by Service and objective area
country POD.
i. Resupply LPFs for up to t h i r t y f o u r
classes/ subclasses of supply * specified by Service for four
U.S . Services and up to three Free World Military Assistance
Forces ( FWMAF) Services. ( For n o n b u l k POL commodities, the

LPFs are expressed in pounds/ma n/d ay . For bulk POL

commodities , the LPF5 are e xpressed in g a l l o n s/m a n/ d a y .)
j. C r i t e r i a for aggregating classes/ subclasses of
supply and t h e i r resupply LPF 5 , into fourteen or fewer
resupply categories specified in terms of the desired
resupply categories and their constituent classes/subclasses
of supply .

*JCS Publi c~ tion Number 6 identifies cargo into 10 classes

of supply , subdivided into 34 subclasses of supply . The
defini tions are included in Appendix I of this report.

L - - -~~~--~~~ _ _
 _
~--
-- - -- -- - - _ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -~~ --~~~~~~~~ _

k. Percentag e a d j u s t m e n t s for a p p l i c a t i o n to the

r e s u p p l y LPF5 to compensate for d i f f e r e n t t h e a t e r ( S e r v i c e )

c o n su mp t i o n s p e c i f i e d by Service and class/ su b c l a s s of

supply. ( Combat I n t e n s i t y F a c t o r ) .

1. Percentage adjustment for application to the

r e s u p p l y LPFs to compensate for c o n s u m p t i o n r a t e d i f f e r e n c e s

between the offshore countries and object ive area

countries.

m. Object ive area country and of f s h o r e country

resupply start days relative to the beginning of the OPLAN

(D+0) specified by c o u n t r y for inplace personnel and by
Service and country for depl oying forces.

n. Num bers of offshore U.S. personnel specified by

Service and c o u n t r y .

o. D e f i n i t i o n s of s t a n d a r d a i r por t s and s e a por t s

w i t h i n C o n t i n e n t a l United S t a t e s (CONUS ) and off shore

c o u n t r i e s s pe c i f i e d by c o u n t r y .

p. Average t r a v e l t ime , in day s, from i n t e r m e d i a t e

l o c a t i o n s to object iv e area country P o r t o f S u p p or t

s p e c i f i e d by o b j e c t i v e area c o u n tr y .

q. A v e rag e t r a v e l t i m e , i n day s, from objectiv e

area c o u n try p or t s o f s u p p or t to d e s t i n a t i o n s p e c i f i e d by

country and type of p o r t o f s u p p or t ( i . e . , airpo r t, general

I
-
s e a p o r t , ammo seaport , and POL s e a po r t ) .

r. Object ive area c o u n tr y ( s ) PWRMS c u t o f f day s

s p e c i f i e d by Service , c o u n t r y , and r e s u p p l y c a t e g o r y .

C-8

7
~ _ _ _ _ _ _

s. Numbers of FWMAF personnel to be resupplied in

the objective area c o u n tr y ( s ) specified by geographic loca-
t ion code and FWMAF Service.
t. Short Ton to Measurement Ton (STtoMT ) con-
version m u l t i p l i e r s specified by Service and class/ subclass
of supply.

Module M20 T h i s module generates the nonunit re-

lated cargo and passenger movement r e q u i r em en t s and adds

them to the TPFDD f i l e . A c o n s i s t e n c y check program e n s u r e s

t h a t a c o n s i s t e n t set of p l a n n i n g f a c t o r s e x i s t in t h e PFF.

This module generates an updated TPFDD and aggregates the

contents. The functions performed are as follows:
a. Aggregate the q u a l i f y i n g e n t r i e s in the TPFDD
file.
b. For each TPFDD File record (or set of ag-
gregated records produced as a result of the action de-
scribed in p a rag r a p h a, a b o v e ) :

(1) Modify each of the class/ s ubclass of supply

LPFs u s in g a p pr o p r i a t e adjustments.
(2) Aggregate the class/ subclass of s u p p ly LPFs

into fourteen or fewer resupply category consiinption

factors. Compute the unitoriented da i ly consumption r a t e
f o r each resuppl y categ ory .
(3) Compute a resupply s t a r t day for each re-
supply categ ory using the f o l lo wi n g p a r a ne t e r s from t h e PFF:

-.- _ - __
- ~~~~~~~~~~~ -- --- - - - - -~~~~~~ -~~~~~~~~~~ _ - - -- -- -- -
~~~~~
-
~~~~~~~~~~
--_ -
~ -- - - - - - ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

_
\.
~~~~

(a) A depl oying unit s PODtodestination

trave l time .
(b) Resupply s t a r t days which are
specified by Service or country ( o b j e c t i v e area and
o f f s h o r e ) f o r inplace u n i t s .
(c) Resupply s t a r t days wh i ch are

s pec i f i e d by Service and country ( o b j e c t i v e area and

offshore ) or PODlatest available date (LAD ) for depl oying
units.
(4) Compute the number of day s of accomp anying
supply required using the f o l l o w i n g p a r a m e t e r s from the PFF :
(a) PWRMS cutoff day s specified by
object ive area country , Service, and resupply category .
(b) Deploying units PODLAD.
(5) Generate a Temporary Work i ng Data F i l e
( TWDF ) with consumption factors and resupply start days for

input to the Resupply/Replacement and Buildup Requirements

Programs.
(6) Generate the TPFD D Summa ry Input Print File.
This f i l e will be the input to the Generate TPFDD Sum ma ry
Inpu t Report Program.

Modul e M60 The prima ry f u n c t i o n is to establish a

PFF prior to the i n i t i a l execution of MW for an OP LAN. For
example, a force list is developed using the FRG . But, be
f o r e t h i s f o r c e l i s t can be processed by t h e M~~~, a PFF

C l O
m u s t be e s t a b l i s h e d w i t h i n the s y s te m . M6 0 a l l o w s the

planner to e s t a b l i s h the i n i t i a l PFF. T h i s PFF may then be

updated and used in the generation of movement requirements
in t h e MRG . The i n i t i a l PFF may be e s t a b l i s h e d in e i t h e r

( 1) blank PFF (one withou t d a t a ) and then u p d a t e the f i l e

with planning p arameters using modul e MlO , or ( 2 ) recal l a
s p e c i f i c PFF fr o m a saved tape for a p a r t i c u l a r OPLA N and/o r
scenario and then update the f i l e u s i n g Modul e M l O.
The PFF accepts materiel consumption rate data in

pounds/man/day , gallons/man/day , pounds/unit/day , or gal-

lons/unit/day only , identified to the thirtyfour subclas-
ses of supply . Annex B of t h e JSCP is f o r m a t t e d in t h i s

manner also. Identification of this consumption to a force

l i s t expressed in U n i t Type Code * (UTC ) per unit of t ime is
necessary .

C. Transportation F e a s i b i l i t y Estimator (TFE )

Logistic t r a n s por t a t i o n planning f a c t o r s form an
important basis as inpu t to the TFE wh i ch is the next step

in the planning cycle. The TFE is a si m u l a t i o n of t h e

t r a n s p o r t a t i o n aspect of the s t r a t e g i c movement problem .

T h i s si mu l a t i o n is accompl i shed by u t i l i z i n g the movement

r e q u i r e m e n t s p r e v i o u s l y developed by t h e MRG to determine if

t h e t r a n s por t a t i o n network is adequate for the job. It

involves the selection of seaports , airfields , ships , air-
craft, and landing craft, and, the use of these assets in

*UTC is a notional grouping of homogeneous u n i t s .

C 1l

- -~~~~~~~~
 - - - - ~~~~~~~~~ - -

simulating the movement of personnel, equipment, and

materiel in g iven scenarios. This capability of selection

and simulation is provided by the TFE modules described
herein. The planning process is highly interactive and
norma lly requires multipl e iterations for every plan. The
overall flow with respect to the TFE was also depicted on
pag e C 3. In examining the TFE modules it should be under-
stood that while the CINCs logistic plans divisions are the
primary user organizations, t h e y are working from a force
list generated by the operations planners. While these
modules are for the purpose of logistic feasibility
analysis, such analysis cannot be done in isolation.
The TFE modules fall into three basic categories: input
p r e p a r a t i o n, s i m u l a t i o n, and o u t p u t p r e p a r a t i o n . The mod-

u l e s t h a t are p l a n n i n g f a c t o r depe ndent are in the input

category :
a.Input preparation consists of first taking the M~~
updated TPFDD file and selecting the data actually needed
for simulation such as force identification , tonnages, pas
sengers , ori gins, required delivery dates. Having done
t h i s, i t is then necessary to d e t e r m i n e w h a t ports, a i r and

sea , are involved and to r e t r i e v e the c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of

those p or t s . In conjunction w i t h this, the distances bet-

ween the ports based on such things as canal openings and
o v e r f l i g h t r i g h t s m u s t be calculated by the planner. The

C-i 2
 - -- _- - -

l a s t step in the input phase is to allow the user to select

the shi ps and a i r c r a f t t h a t are to be u t i l i z e d in the

simulations. Two major p o i n t s shoul d be emphasized. First,

the a i r and sea simulations are two completely seperate
activities. Second ly , while the use of s t a t i c f i l e s/t a b l e s
is stressed , the user has considerable f l e x i b i li t y in mod i-
f y i ng any d a t a he chooses. The s ta t i c f i l e s contain the
t r a n s por t a t i o n planning f a c t o r s . The three major f i l e s of
Navy i n t e r e s t are:

channel Distance File the distance b et ~~ en p or t s .

( S i t e un ique )

Port c ha r a c t e r i s t i c s f i l e p ort throughput con

straints.

Standard S h i p/A i r c r a f t c ha r a c t e r i s t i c s File ship

speed and cargo carrying capabilities.
b. The next major phase is simulation. This is the
h e a r t of the TFE and u t i l iz e s the input d a t a pr eviou sly
prepared . The models attemp t , based on program med user
rules , to s i m u l a t e the selecting and loading of vehicles at
the p orts of embarkation , assembly of convoys if desired ,
t r a n s i t i n g to and u n l o a d i n g at the p or t s of d e b a r k a t i o n as

~~ll as providin g an analysis of scheduled closures vs. the

planners r equired clos ures .
C. The last phase of TFE is o u t p u t p r e p a r a t i o n . The
p r i m ary goal is to present the data developed in the
s t r u c t u r e d f o r m a t s r equired and to pe rmi t reduction of

Cl3

- - -- -_~~~~~~..-- _ _ --
 ~~~~ - -
_ - _ _~~~~~ ~~~ - - -- -_~~~~~~

potentially voluminou s reports to more manageable size . The

hard copy Time Phased Transportation R e q u i r e m e n t s List
(TPTRL), t h e p r i m ar y s t a t em e n t of t r a n s por t a t i o n d a t a ,

i n c l u d i n g su p p o r t i n g r e p o r t s, is generated from al]. the d a t a

developed and s i m u l a t i o ns as depicted on pag e C3 of t h i s

Appendix.

C-i 4

1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~~~~ ~~ - - - -- -- - -- - _ _ -
 THE JO iNT CHIE FS CF STAFF
- ~~~~~~~~~~ wAs ~INcTcN . O C. 20301

J SM77476

-
~~~~ ~~

16 September ~~ 76
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

~~ MORANDUM FOR: Chief cf Staff , CS Army

Chief of Naval Operations
Chief of Staff , CS Air Force
Commandant of the Mar i ne Corps
C omman d er in Chief , Ae rospace Def ens e Conunand
Conunander in Chief , A t l a n t i c
US Commander in Chief , Europe
Commander in Chie f, Pacific
Commander in Chief , US Readiness Command
Commander in Chief , US Southern Command
Commander in Chief , Strategic Air Command
Director, Defense Communications Agency
Director , Defense Intelligence Agency
Director , Defense Supply Agency
Director , Joint S t a f f

Subject: Added Terms of Reference f o r a Log is tic Factors

File To Be Use4 by the Joint Operation Planning
System Movement Requirements Generator

1. Reference SM45 17 5 , 11 August 1975 , Expansion of the

Terms of Referen ce for the Joint Operation Planning System
Interim Software .
2. In approving the reference , the Joint Chiefs of Staff
directed the development of a logistic planning factors
file , in coordination with the Services an CINCPAC . The
~
added terms of r eferenc e for a Logistic Factors File to
be used by the Joint Operation Planning System Movement
Requirements Generator are contained in the Appendix .
3. The Director , Joint Staff , in coordination with the
Services , will develop , implemen t, and distribute the
Logistic Factors File in Annex B to JSCP FY 78.

For the Joint Chiefs of Staff:

P. M. MARTIN ON
Captain , CSN
Secretary

C- is
Joint S t aff action assigned Attachment ( 1) to Appendix C
to -4 per DJS
~

APPENDIX
ADDED TE?M S OF REFERENCE FOR A LOGIST IC FACTORS FILE I
TO SE U SED 8Y THE JOINT OPERATION PLAN NING SYSTEM
MOVEMENT REQUIP.EM EN TS 3ENERATOR I

].. Req u.i:emert t. The J o in t Operation P l a nn in g System (JOPS )

Movement Requ.~.re ttent s 3ert erator (MRG) requires the nput of Service ~~.

r esupply and personnel replacement planning factors .n order to

determin e total :ionunit-related personnel and materiel requirements 2.

to sustain forces for the duration of an OPLAN . The logistic 2.
planning factors utilized have a significant impact on OPLAN feasi 2.
bility since they are a major determinant of wart .~ine personnel 12.
:epl.acemer.ts, resupply material requirements . and/or li f t req uire ~!

nents to support a joint operation. It is essential .

~refore , 1!
that current Serviceappr oved logistic factors be utilized by joint 11
operation planners and that these factors be maintained in an
approved OPLAN guidance doc~mtent which is subject to annual Service 12.
review and approval . a
2. Ob~ ect~.ves 17

a. Serviceapproved logistic factors for joint operation planning 12.

will be specified in Annex S to JS CP in order to insure their 12.
sta~~ ardized application by all cc~~ ands and to facilitate
annual Service review and update . II
b. Services w ill submit logistic factors and planning po in ts of 3.~ .
origin data for materiel and personnel replacements for inclus i on 12.
in Annex 3 to JSCP in accordance with the formats contained in 1.
the Annexes hereto . Formats will be adapted by each Service
to sat~.s fy its Serviceunique logistic requirements. Such
adaptations w i l l be designed to conform with the input parameters ~2.

of the JOPS 11: movement requirements generator where fsasibl~ .

~
j.
Ad~ ustmsnts to ref ine or improve the formats further may 5
. 12.
sta!fed during t
h e annual Annex 3 to CSCP review cycle.

The manually fzrmatted Logisti : factors in Annex 3 to SCP

provLd . the v e h ic le fo ~ ins uring that ~c1nt op.rat~.on planners 32

App.ndix
3M- 74-76 c16

- -
_ -- -
 use current logistic factors which have capt pace w i t h Service 1
requirements for increased readiness and deployability and new
materiel and weapon acquisitions . I

~~. he Serv ices w ill prov ide their initial logistic factor input
T 4
for the annual update cycle of Annex 3 to JSCP F? 78 to begin in 5
December 1976. 6
d. Service component planners will review and adjust the Service
approved resupply factors , as necessary , to meet ~i1an-unique 2.

requirements . 2.
f. An automated Logistic Factors File (LZP) for JOPS will 5
.
developed i n the future based on the LFF data contained in 11
Annex B to JSCP . 3.2
3. Resoonsibilities 13
a. The Director for Logisti cs , OJCS , is responsible for: 14
Cl) Coordinating the Service input of logistic factors to 15
be included in Annex B to JSCP . 3.6
(2)
~4cnitor ing use of the Annex B to JS~~ Logistic factors
during the j o i n t operation planning and revi ew process. 13
(3) Development of a JOPS automated capability to calculate 19
resupply/replacement for OPLANs based upo n the LIT . 20
b . The Services are resoonsib le f o r : 21
(1) Developing , defining, and validating th . logistic plan 22
aing factors which they require to be used f o r joint operation 23
planning. 24
(2) Providing the logistic factors defined ifl Annexes 3 , 25
C, and 0 hreto to the Director for Logistics , OJCS , for 26
inclusion in Annex 3 to JSCP . 27

Apoer.d~ C
C-l7

_
~~- -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - -- - -~~~~~~~~ -~ - ~~~~ -~~~ -~~~~~~~~ -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~~~~ --
 __ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- -

ANNEX A I

SUPPLY SU3CLASSES I
TO 3!USED IN A LOGISTIC FACTORS FILE IN ANNEX 3, JSCP I

LA Rations , Air (in fl igh t ) 4

lC - Rations , Combat
lR - Refrigerated sub sistence
1S Nonrefrigerated subsistence (less combat rations ) 2.
23 - Ground support materiel 2.
2! - General supplies 2.
2! - Clothing and textiles 12.
LM - Weapons

2T - Industrial Supplies 12.

3A - POL, Air I
I
3W POL, Ground (surface) Ii
4 - Construction materiel
5A - ?.zmnunitior., Air

SW - A u ni t io n, . Ground 12.
6 - Personal D emand Items 1!
7A Major End Items , Air 12.
73 -
Major End Items , Ground support materiel

70 Major End Items , Administrative vehicles II

70 Major End Items , Electronics 12.
Major End Items , Tactical vehicles 12.
7L M&~ Or End Items , Missiles
7M
Major End Items , W eapons 12.
7W Major End Items , SpecIal weapons Ii
8 Medical materiel 12.
-

PA - Repair Parts , Air a!

98 - Repair Parts , Ground support materiel 12.
90 Repair Parts , Administrative vehicles 2.9.

PG Repair Parts , Electronics 11.

SM 774-76 Annex A
018

- - - ~~--~~
~ - - - - - -

9K - Repair Parts , TactIcal Vehicles 1

9L - Repair Parts , Missiles 2

-:
PM - Repair Parts , Weapons 3

9W - Repair Parts , Sp ecial W eapons 4

- Repair Parts , Indus trial Suppli~es ~~.

in - Materiel to support nonmilitary programs 6

C-19

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - -~~~-~~~ - -~~~~~~~ - ~~~~-~~~

 -

r~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

x
x
0

>1

0
-4 -0

z I
o
I-.

I
U, ~. U,
= 0

0 0 41
4

~ f-I I
.4 4 4
C,,
mm
~ E~
x ~
C Z :4
I4
I
4
4
~
. ml
I Z

U,
0
4
-
I :4
I
O ~~
f-
-

0
I.
O
-
I S
0!
C,,
S
.
~ S
S

U
. 0
U

~~~~~ ~~
iC
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2
U
~

SM774 6 C20

_
- --- - ---- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 - -- -~~~~~~~ .- -~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~

--

:4
4

U,

g -

(14 :4

4=
:
Cl, e~.r i~
0
x
S

U ~~
.
~~ ~~~
.
~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~
.i ~~~
.
~~~ o
~~I I l el ri ~~i
~~~
~~I
0~~~~ ri ri ~~ l ~~
~~ ~~ ~
1 . 0 0 4 1 1 4 0 0
C )
~ ~~
m4 m me N N N N N N N N 0 Cm Cm
C_ 0 ~
:4
~
- c .
4 00
L~ LV

C2l Annex P
-

Ij
I
 - .
---~~~-
-

0
.>. 4 -

~~~~~~~~~ .01.
o~~~ 0 c
~J 0
~m
S S~~
0
1. 0 4 > 0
0 >.4 v 04
01
J l 5 5 o c
4 ~
c1.Q.U
0 0 > ..-.
~~~~~~~~~~
O U S
4 E 0 ..~J > .4 5
0. 0 1 1.
U
~~~~ 4 0
01.4U, .5
0 4
0
4 . - .S c 0 >a
o.. 0 0 0~~ - 4
I v 1 . 0 0 0 m ..
1 . 0 . 0~~~~~~ S 0

1 1 5 0 1 a 5 0
0 0 0 0 ~ O~~~ J S
0 c i.
0~~~~~~ 0 0 0
4
0 0 . 0 0 .50 1.
U, le O. ..4 1 4 5 0 5
S 0 0 0 0 1 4 4 .0
S
CflQ
1.
.
o O C c.0 .
.0
4 0 .4.4 4 S4 . 0
4= 0.4 i.e
0.4 00 0
.4 I
0 -4 1 4 0 ...I .
O
4
m
Q B 0 O . > . S~ S
1 > 0 0 0 0 0
C)
I 00
O 10.
O ~3 . 00 0 . > -
I 00 1 00 0
U, U,
= 4 > 0 5 E 4 0
O
E-
-
,
0~~3 .o. i c
C) 41
4 0. 30
Ci. E c S S I E
.
C) E- S
4
~ x vo X -4
Cl, m
4 E s
.0Cm C 00
0 5 0
4 0 0 0~~~ 0
0
0 5 1 . 0~~~~~~ -~
m 0 0 ~~ 0 E
~~ 01.

0 -4 0 0 0
~~~~
I >,U0S.OSCJ U
55.4J 5 l e 00 -4
0 I.. . )., . 4~ >
mm I 0 N 0 5 I . l
1. 0 0 . .0 V S
~~ 0i.lCj
5.. ~
>
0 0 0 0 0 . o ~
0 5 l e . 0
U lO. 4 0 O.S. Q
C ) i 0 fl ~~~~ . 0 l e 4
>%. . .
) i Q 1 1> , 5 0 . 5
~
14 0 0 0 0 0
Cl, 0.0
0 0 0
S 0~~~~~~ O0 -.0 U0S5
.0 0 . 0 0 > f - >> . 0
. 5 m.e U ~~~
cc j ~ ~~ ..
.
~
.. 0 0 5 s . oo V
0.0 r i
~~I ~~i ri ri r i
00 5 > 0 :04
)
.i lI, U,
~ I 1 5 0
0 5>, Cm Cm Cm Cm 0% Cm
~4

<I
0 0.
C 0.
0 0 ~~l~
..
..
~~~
Im4q. i
.
.
ml
0

Annex 3
C- 2 2

_ - -
-
-
~~~~~
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 -~~~~ -

UI
:4
.4

I
5..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

II
10
5. =
C) Cl
~ 5-
.4
x u z
~2 0 I-. ml
1 4
U,
4 0 : 4
5. 14.
m 5-
i 14.

5 - I
:4

4 S.Q 4 1 4 1 4 0 C~ 0 ~~ 4 1 1 4 1 0 4
0.0 m 1(1 411 N N N N N N N N Cm 5% Cm
mm
C

I 2

SM-~74 -76 Annex C

C23
 -~~~
-

10
=
14

0.

5-
C

0
51
4
O
.4

0
Cm
Ole:
1 . 0 C m
S . 4 C
> .
~
.5~~ f 5
450
0.0 51
4
~~
4 00

411

.4
S
.~~~~~ W
0.0
P~~~ 0 S
-~~~~ 1.
0 E4 . C0 O
51 C m O S m el
5. C U: 51)
1 0 .4
C) ~~~~~~
0 0 5114
S
>S - . .E 0
5. .
.
4 I l4 E
10 0 Q -4 .l .. eJ 4
5.. . 40 0 0 0. 0.
O C4 W E
1.51
0 4 C O K S
0 C C4 .C W C

..
0 4
4 0 0
4 4 5 0 C Q S
0.4 41 .0 14 0. 515) 51
.0 SOS 1 . 0 4
O 5.. 0 0 ..0 C e.. O
51 ~
U 1. 0 . 0 .
4 0 0 1.
UI 14 1 4 4 0 0. CCI 0
I C) 4) 00 . 5 ~~
S
0 5- 4
Cm 0 4 S
.4 10. 04 0 W 0 0
5.. .1 . 4 C 9
~~ 0
0
14 ...4 *. ) 5 ) .5
0)
0.
Cl,
m 0 5 0 ~
0 0
0 C0O 0 I UI
113
=
~

003 51 o c i
..4 . .4
4
0. 4 W 4 1.
<1 0
~~ .5
O 1
.
C 0 0
,.4 - C 0 0 4 0.
C) 1
>4 1 0 0
4 1 0
5 4100 0.15 1.
Ci. 14 5. 0 > 1 .0 >,m C . -4
5- 4 o~
1
) 6 0) 1 Cm .4 0..4 5 S
4.4 Ii) 0 .4 0.
0 - 1 0> , 41
5- 5 -C . ~4 5 0 6> iI
1 0 5- 0. 0- 0 S
,1, 1 -4 ~ 4. Z 14
.0 0 5)4
~~~~
I 0
S 0 0 0 .~ I .4
151 0
SOCi. 5..
5.. ~~~~~~~
X C .0 0.113 .5
11 0> > 1 0
0 11.0 51 4 I
.9 51. 0 1 1 .
5- 1 ~ 5111 0 51
14 S .9 i- .0 .
.0 14
1 5- . C S 0 I 0C )
5.. 1 4 . 0 0 0 l ~~~~
0V 5 -
Ci. C 514 . 0 .I~~~
5 . 5 0 > C0 r
O 5. 1. 1 . 1. .0 1
51 1.. I
14 0 0 0 05 1 c 5 0 . 41
0. 1 O.0 4 .4 1I3 - 1 0.
>4 0 000 wI U
5. C) SOW
14 i . 4 4 4 V 0 C
.4541 I 0
.~~~ C
.4 41
U, 0 1
~~ ~~ . 0 4 5 4 10
4 1 1 5- 5 5 >. 4 0 5 0 > I
~~
4 0.101 5%
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
Cm 5% 5% Cm 00.
1 0 14>4
41 . 4 1 0 . 5 1 .
U > 0 . 5 0. 0 0 0 0 0
~~ 10 . 4 .00
5 . 1 4 . 4 > 4 S1 (1, .0
iI 0. 51 0 0 0 0 >~~ 4 S
.EO - 1 .4 0 C0
1 0 00 4 10 0 44
. 0 > 5 1 . 4 0 1 4 4 1 4 5 1 5
S 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0
- 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 1.
i l J %0 5 . > . h dl . 4 I I 55
~~ I .41 0 I I S

QCO. CI.
0. .0 0 0 5 . 4 0 1 4
. 9
>4
5.
5- ..
. .
S.
.-
55.~
ml

C- 24

_ _ _ _-
~ - -

I
144
.
4

1 1 4
.
4

Ci.

I I
1
4 1

.4 .
4
0. 5
.~
4

0
0
~ 41 Ci.
0
5)
5.
I C
.
4 4
4-
0
0
C
41
I
10 S
5.,
I S
0) SI
I C

mc
4 0 0
5. .5 0
Cii .4 0
I U
.0 0
CI
5. 14 CA 4 0 1 1 0 0 1 Ci.4 I 4 1 4 1 4
1 1 -4 C4 44 ~~~~ me 0
0 5., 5
C~ C .-4 41
Ci) Cl) 0. 0
5- 1 0. 0
4 03 0 Ci.
C) 5. Cli

c25
SM-774-76

_____________________
 I
.4

.4
I
0
I
0
I
Ci.
14
CS

I
14
C)
I
Ci)
5.

0
5 - 0 3

0 0

CII
C.
I
.
4
0
5.
.4
I CS
.
4 .
4
II
3 0
5 .0

U
U
S

14 0.
5- 0.
mc S
U Cl)

C- 2 6
 - - ---- - - - - - -- ~~~~~~~~ -- - --
~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~

-4
I
.4
.
4
CS 3
.4
1 41
O 0
I

5.4 41
U
14 -4
CS 5.
4 iI
5,
I
14
41.-v
5.3 CS.
5. 530.0
1.41(1
5 1 0.- .
0.5.4
0
- 0 5 0.
5. 14 0 1 4 5
1 0
O 0 4141
C) U

1 4 1 . 0
1 0 00 3
144 14 41(1
CS 5. . 4> 4
144 4 41>0
IU 014 5
o q 0 4 1 0
1 1 0 0
0 . 0 4
C 14 0 0
CO SO > .
10 .5
5. -4O O.
2 0410.
P.4 .000
O 0 0 1 0
5. 41.0
1 41
CS ~~ > 4 0- UI
IC .4 1 5
14 .
4 0. 0
II
2 0 0
0 -
5..
0. C .0 51
I
2 4141
14.
0
0 1 .04 1
0. 0 0..-

C
5410
- .0 .-
5 ) 1 4 1
I~
4 1 1 . 4 1 5
0-0

.
4 U I 0
5 . 5 5314
1. 0 0
0 1 . 0
55.45
O .4
O 5 1 0 0 5
S

0
.0 41-41 53
0 0 5> 40

I
>4 0) 5. 0
1
0 >4 5 1 . 0 .
& 5 1 4 1 0 0
15.10.0
5-

C-27
-
.4

_ .__ 1

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 AP PEND IX D

Summa ry of Phase I By JOPS Class

_ _ _ _ _ .-
- - -, -- - -~~~~~~~~~ - - --
- -
. -- - -_- -~~~- - - - -.-~~ -~~~

-
AP PENDIX D
Summa ry of Phase I Findings

and Recomme ndations By JOPS Class

A.. Class I Subsistence ( Food)

Consumption of Class I item s is personnel oriented .

The source of data f o r Class I consunption is the
Navy Food Service Systems Office (NFSSO), Washington , D.C.

The data span the t i m e period from 1968 to t h e

present.

NFSSO has developed planning factors and validated

them i n Fy 1976.

The Study Group has revi ewed the NFSSO data and has
concluded that subsistence planning factors are valid and
will require minima l manipulation by NFSSO to orient them
for JOPS usage.

The LPFs deve loped f o r Class I will represent wart ime

consumption.
B. Class II Base Support Materiel

Consumption of Class I I items is equi ~xn ent related

with the exception of Subclasses lI E and h F which contain
a d m i n i s t r a t i ve and housekeeping supplies, clothing , and
textiles.

Consumption and physical characteristics data w i l l

come from t h e Navy ICP transaction h i s t o r y data contained in

t h e D ODMDS d a t a base.

D-2

- ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ --~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Resupply LPFs for Class I I items are required , and

the a g g r e g a t i o n method discussed in t h i s report with the
DO1~4DS d a t a base w i l l be used to develop these factors.

Combat intensity factors will be applied to Class II

f o r consumption.
C. Class III Petroleum

Consumption of Class III is dictated pr imarily by

scenario and operation tempo.

The d a t a base f o r bulk petroleum WRMR is maintained

by OP4 l 3 at NARDAC , W a s h i n g t o n , D.C. and is updated on a

monthly basis.

Bulk POL LPFs are r eq u i r ed and will be deve loped by

OP4 l3 w i t h th e data base.

Packaged petroleum consumption and physical

characteristics data will come from the Navy ICP transaction
h i s t o r y data contained in the DODMD S data base .

Resuppl y LPFs for packaged petroleum are r equired,

and the aggregation method in t h i s report with the DODMD S
d a t a base w i l l be used to develop these factors.

The subclasses of supply for POL are to be ex-

panded to includ e JP 5 and AVGA S for air and Diesel Marine
Fuel , MOGAS , and Navy Special Fue l Oil for ground use.

The LPF s developed for Class I I I (Bulk POL) w i l l

represent wartime consumption .

D-3

- -~~~~- - ~~~~ - - - -- -- - ~~~~~~~~~

~ .-
~~ -- -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ _ _ _ _ _

D. Class IV Construction Materiel

Class IV resupply planning factors are scenario

oriented .

Consumption and physical characteristics data will

come from Navy ICP t r a n s a c t ion history d a t a contained in the

DODMDS data base.

LPFs for Class IV are re quired , and the aggregation

method discussed in t h i s r e por t w i t h t h e DODMD S data base

w i l l be used to develop these factors.

Combat intensity factors will be applied to Class IV

consumption.
E. Class V Ammunition

Class V consumption is scenario oriented .

Potential consumption data is developed in the NNOR
process by OP4l l.

The ammunition requirement is up dated a n n u a l l y for

the POM , by scenario.

LPFs f o r Class V are r equired and will be deve loped

from the NNOR process.

The LPF5 developed f o r Class V will represent wartime

consumption.
F. Class VI Persor~ i Demand Items ( N onMilitary Sale
Items)

Class VI planning factors are personnel oriented .

The source and location of Class VI consumption data
is t h e Navy Resale System O f f i c e ( N R S O ) , Brooklyn , New York .

D- 4

- -~~-~~~~ --
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
.- ~~ -- --- --- _ _ _ _ _ _
 -- _ _ _ _ -~~~

The LPFs developed f o r C l a s s VI w i l l represent wa r-

time consumption .
G. Class VII Major End Items

Class VII is comprised of major pieces of equipment,

such as a i r c r a f t, major elect ronic systems , ground vehicles,
associated propellers, shafts , and aircraft engine s, etc.
Class VII items should be for Navy purposes, equated with
principal items as defined in Navy Policy and Standards for
Supply Management , NAVSO Pl500. These items are general ly
subject to two types of usage : (1) normal attrition and (2)
combat attrition , including battle damage.

Usage and physical characteristics data for Class VII

items will be derived fr-an the Navy inventory manager
transaction history data contained in the DODMDS data base.
This data w i l l be reviewed for accuracy ~y the cognizant
command and , if approve d , will be converted to LPF S u s i n g

t h e aggregation method and combat i n t e n s i t y f a c t o r s .

Most Navy Systems Commands ( SYS COMS), as inventory

managers for Class VII, feel that replacement of many Class
VII items will not occur during contingencies by shipment of
replacements to t h e a t e r, and so LPF5 should not include
transportation requirements for these items. If SYSCOMS
f i n d t h a t for t h i s or other reasons the data derived from
the DODMD S f i l e s is i n a c c u r a te , comma n ds will develop valid
LPFS for Class VII items under their cognizance.

D- 5
~ -- - - - - - - - -- - -- -- - -- - --~~~~~~ - - - --~~~~ --- ~~~~~~~~ - - - - -~~~~ - ~~~~~~~~

H. Class VIII Medical Materiel

Consumption of Class VIII materiel is personnel

oriented .

The source and location of Class VIII consumption

data is the Naval Medical Material Support Command ,
( NAV ME Et4 ATS U PPCOM ), P h i l a d e l p h i a, Pennsyl v a n i a .

The LPFs developed for Class V III will represent

w a r t i m e c o n s ump t i o n .

I. Class IX Repair P a r t s and Components

Consumption of Class IX materiel is equipment or

weapon system oriented .

Consumption and physical characteristics data will

come from t h e Navy ICP t r a n s a c t i o n h i s t ory d a t a contained in

the DODMDS data base.

LPFs for Class IX are required , and the aggregation

method discussed in this report with the DODMDS data base
w i l l be used to develop these factors.

Combat intensity factors will be applied to Class IX

cons umpt ion.
J. Class X Materiel to Support NonMilitary Programs

Class X is comprised pr imarily of materiel used to

support the economi c development of fore ign c o u n t r i e s .

Class X resupply is not pert inent to the objectives

of this study .

D-6

1
. - _ - -- - - -- _ - - -- --- -~~~~~~~~~ -.-
-
~

APPENDIX E
Re l e v a n t Resuppl y LPF L i t e r a t u r e Search

1
- -- -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - - - - - ---
~~~~ - - - - - - - _ _
~

APPENDIX E
Releva n t Resu p ply LPF Li tera t ure Summary

1. Lgistics Reference Data, NAVMAT P40002 (formerly NWIP

112 1 ).

Published 30 September 1973

The Navy logistics information reference
Incorporates tables displ aying logistics information
and data (see Attachment 1 to this Appendix)

For all users of logistics info rmation includ ing CINC

Logistics Planners

Table 1.5 , Consumption Data for Suppl y Categories of

Material (Ten Classes)
Not updated
-
Pounds/man/d ay factor for ashore , afloat , and
w o r l d w i d e by DOD c l a s s and s u b c l a s s by Navy Cognizance
Symbo l
Developed u s i n g NAVSUP P u b l i c a t i o n 295 f o r con-

sumption data and NAV PERS 15658 and o t h e r NAVPERS d o c um e n t s

for personnel data

Where direct r e l a t i o n s h i p from Navy Cognizance

Symbol to DOD s u b c l a s s not e s t a b l i s h e d , a most appr opria te

class chosen
Does not i d e n t i f y a f a c t o r for bulk POL ( C l a s s I I I )

and Ammun ition (Class V) (Refers to NNOR and other tables)

Other tables may be useful logistics reference data

but not related to JOPS LPFc

E 2

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 All tables are listed in Attachment 1 to this
Appendix.

2. OPNAVNOTE C8000 21 Septemer 1976, NonNuclear Ordnance

Requirements (U), POM 78 Update (NNOR )

Provides ammunition consumption plans based on

scenario

Updated annually .
3. Naval Warfare Information Publication (NWI P) 112 1

Developed in early 1950 s by the Logistics Research

Project of George Washington University under contract to
the Office of Naval Research

Working papers and methodology still available

Data accumulated on an individual ship or squadron
basis from ~or1d War II consumption data

Planning Factor tables for activities (POt, am-

munition , general stores , and spare parts) provided factors
by ship class or aircraft type

Incorporated the premise that resupply commodities

are equipnent , personnel , or scenario oriented

Assumed a Standard Condition roughly analogous to a

current OPLAN

Expressed requirements as BBL/Day , Man/Day , MT/Day ,

or ruzn/Day

tncorporated a Theater Commander judgement factor

r -w ~~4.ri -~~pu ta t ion method for expressing resupply
- - ~~ - ic~ L viti.1 N for one entire force
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ATTACHMENT ONE TO APPE NDIX E

P4000 2 TABLES

TABLE

1.1 Navy and Marine Corps Monthly Combat Expenditures

in Sou theas t A s i a , Mar 6 9 throu g h Mar 7 0 (Ar t icle
112 )

1.2 A m m u n i t i o n (Measur ement Tons) f o r SEA Moved

across Piers at Bangor , Concord , Earle , and Sun ny
Poin t Be tween January 196 8 and De c ember 1971
(Ar t icle 113 )

1.3 Fuel Consumption (Gallons per Hour) (Article 121)

l.3a Fuel Consump tion (Gallons per Hour ) for Steamships

burning N D (A r t i c l e 121)

1.4 Aircraf t Fuel Consumption (Article 122)

1.5 Consump tion Data for Supply Categories of Material

(10 Classes) (Article 131)

1.6 Mon thly Resuppl y Requirements for Repair Parts and

Consumable Stores by ship Type (Article 132)

1.7 Marine Corps Resupply Data (Air and Sea Lift)

(Rev i se d) (Ar t icle 134 )

1.8 Planning Fac tors for Mail Resupply (Article 135)

2.1 Characteristics of Specific Ammunition Item s

( A r t ic l e 210 )

2.2 Destroyer Tender Ammunition Al l owances (Section

210)

2.3 R e p r e s e n t a t i v e S u r f a c e S h i p A m m u n i t i o n Allowances
(Section 210)
2.4 Re p r e s e n t a t i v e Al l owances for Submarines and
Submarine Tenders (Section 210)

2.5 AE/AOE Fleet Issue Ammunition Load List Allowance

(Section 210)
2.6 Characteristics of Specific Classes of AE/AOE Loads
by We i g h t and Cube ( S e c t i o n 210)

E 4

_ _
- -- - --
2.7 CVA Stowage Capacity (Long Tons) for Aviation
Ammuni tion (Section 210)

2.8 Loading Guide for CVAs for Selected Aviation Ammunition

(Section 210 )

2.9 Load ing Guide for CVS5 for Selected Aviation Ammunition
(Section 210)

2.10 Fue l Capabilities of Ships (Barrels) (Section 220)

2.11 Avia tion Fue l Capacities of Carriers (Section 220)

2.12 AO Standard Load (In Barrels) (Section 230)

2.13 TAO Standard Load (Section 230)

2.14 Stores Supply Levels (Section 240)

2.15 Characteristics of an AF and an AFS Fleet Load

- (Subsistence) (Article 241)
2.16 C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e B R a t i o n (1 , 000 Men per Day
for 30 Days) (Article 241)
3.1 Typical Replenishment at Sea Vulnerability Calculation
(Alongside A F ) (Section 300)
3.2 TransferatSea Rates ( Short Tons or Barrels per Hour )
(Section 310)
4.1 Standard A i r c r a f t Squadron/Aircraf t Assignme n t s
(Section 420)
4.2 Standard Aircraft Squadron/Aircraft Assig nment (Not
Assigned as Squadrons to CVAS or CVS5) (Section 4 2 0 )
4.3 Deck Spotting FactorsA 7 Equivalent (Section 420)
4.4 Marine Corps Au thorized Al lowances for Headquarters
Units and Shore Establishments (Section 420)
4.5 Section B Initial Outfitting List Numbers for U.S.
Navy A i r c r a f t (Section 430)
4.6 Shipping C h a r a t e r i s t i c s of Section A Standard
A e r o n a u t i c a l and Navy Stock Account Material List
(Sect . s n 4 4 0 )
4.7 S h i p p i n g C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of Section B A i r c r a f t
All owance Lists (Section 440)

E-5
~ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

r ~~~~~~

4.8 Shipping Charac teristics of Section R (Aeronautical

Electronic Material) Initial Outfitting Lists (Section
440 )

4.9 S h i p p i n g C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of Section N Material

Ini t ial Ou tf i tt ing Lis t s (Section 440 )
4.10 Shipping Characteristics of Section X Material
Ini tial Outfitting Lists (Section 440)

4.11 Shipping Characteristics of Aircraft Engines (Section

450 )

4.12 weight ( SIT ) and Cub e ( M/T ) of A i r c r a f t Depl oyed to

CVA/CVS (Section 460)

4.13 We ight (S/T) and Cube (M/T) of Aircraft Squadrons

Deployed to Shore Operating Bases (Section 460)

5.1 Representative Ship and Afloat Staff Al lowance and

Complements ( S e c t i o n 500)
5.2 Personnel Requirements for Carrier Air Wi ngs (Section
500 )

5.3 Tables of Organization for Marine Corp s Aviation Units

(Revised ) (Section 500 )

5.4 Transien ts , Pa t ien ts , and Pr isoners (T.P.&P .) (Article

501)

5.5 Passenger Air Transport Planning Factors (Article 502)

5.6 Passenger S e a l i f t P l a n n i n g Factors ( A r t i c l e 5 0 2 )
5.7 Tables of Organization for Marine Corps Ground Units
(A r t i c l e 505)
6.1 E s t i m a t ed R e p a i r Requirements in Manday s per S h i p
Mon th , Sixth Fleet (FY 1967) (Section 610)
6.2 Distri~ .ition of Forward Area Repair Support, Sixth
Fleet (FY 1967) (Section 610)
6.3 E s ti ma t e d Repair R e q u i r e m e n t s in Manday s per Sh i p
Mon t h , Si xth Fleet (F Y 1968) (Se ction 610)
6.4 Distribution of Forward Area Repair Support , S i x t h
Flee t (FY 1968) ( S e c t i o n 610)

6.5 Est im ated R e p a i r R e q u i r e m e n t s in Mand ay s per S h i p

Month , Sixth Fleet (F? 1969) (Section 610)

E-6

- - - -- ---- - - - ---
~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ - - ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ --~~~~ - ~~~~~~~~~

-
6.6 E s t i m a t e d R e p a i r R e q u i r e m e n t s in Ma nday s per Ship
Month , Seven th Flee t (F? 1967) ( S e c t i o n 610)

6.7 Distribution of Forward Area Repair Support , Seven t h

Flee t (FY 1967) (Section 610)

6.8 Estimated Repair Requirements in Mand ay s per Ship

Mon th , Seven th Fleet (FY 1968) (Section 610)
6.9 Distri bution of Forward Area Repair Support , Seven th
Flee t (FY 1968) ( S e c t i o n 610)

6.10 Estimated Repair Requirements in Manday s per Ship

Mon th , Seven th Flee t (FY 1969) (Section 610 )
6.11 Distribution of Forward Area Repair Support , Seven t h
Fleet (FY 1969) (Section 610)

6.12 Ship Repair and Overhaul by All Naval Shipyards (FY

1969 ) (Section 610)

6.1 3 Estimated Repair Capabilities o~ Tenders an d Repair

Sh i p s (Section 6 10 )

6.14 Status , Loca t ion , and Capabilities of Navy Active and

Reserve Floating Dry Docks (Section 610)

6.15 Location and Capability of Floating Dry Docks on Loan

or Lease (Section 610)

6.16 Floating Dry Dock Planning Factors and Service Craft

Allowance (Section 610)

6.17 Electric Power Capabilities of Tenders and Repair Ships

(Section 610)

6.18 Electric Powe r Requirements for Naval Ship Types and

Classes W h i l e Being Tended Alongside Tenders and Repair
Ships (Section 610)
6.19 P o r t a b l e Water Capabilities of Tenders and Repair Ships
(S ection 610)
6.20 Portable Water Requirements for Ships (Section 610)
6.21 Steam Requirements of Ships Alongs ide and Export
Capabilities of Tenders and Repair Shi ps (Section 610)

7.1 Ad vanced Base Functional Componen t Description and Data

( S e c t i o n 710)

E-7

-- _ _
- - - ---- - -- ~~~~~~~~~,-- - -~~~~----- - ---~~ - - - - -
 --~~-- --- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --~~~ ---~~~ - - -~~~~~~~ --~~~ - ~~~~~~~~~~

7.2 M i n i m u m R e q u i r e m e n t s for Advanced Base Airfield

Surfacing Materials (Average Conditions) (Article 725)

7.3 General Characteristics of a Minimum SATS Installation

for Je t Aircraft Using Assisted Takeoffs and Arrested
Landings (Article 726)
7.4 Characteristics of Portable Airfield Surfacing (Article
726 )
7.5 Some Averag e F a c t o r s f o r C o n v e r t i n g Net Storage Space
Required to Gross Space R eq u i r e d f o r Storage Operation;
(Ar t icle 728 )

7.6 Percentag e of Supplies Requiring Covered Storag e

(A r t i c l e 7 28 )

7.7 Construction Time Requirements for Selected Projects

(A r t i c l e 751 )

8.1 MSC Transportation Capacities (Article 821)

8.2 Major U.S . Flag and U .S. Controlled Commercial
Passenger Ships (Article 821)

8.3 Average Characteristics U.S. Merchant Marine Cargo

Ships (Article 822)

8.4 Mari time Administration Merchant Ship Classification

Coding (Article 822)

8.5 Characteristics of MSC and Privately Owned U.S. Flag

Tankers (A r t icle 8 2 3 )
8.6 Significant Dimensions and Capacities of C4 (Article
825 )

8.7 Significant Dimensions and Capacities of C3 (Article

825)
8.8 S i g n i f i c a n t D i m e n s i o n s and C a p a c i t i e s of C2 (A r t i c l e
825)
8.9 Significant Dimensions and Capacities of VC2 (VICTORY )
(Article 825)

8.10 Aircraft Carrier Cargo Capabilities for Assembled

Aircraft (Article 826)
8.11 Hatch , Boom , and Winch Data , U.S. Merchant Marine Cargo
Ships (Article 827)

E- 8 -

~~~
-- --- --- --
--
~ - --- -- - - - -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -~~~~-- - ~~~~~~~~

8.12 Characteristics of Notional Ships (Article 828)

8.13 Cargo Density Conversion Table in Long Tons (Articles
829 and 830)
8.14 Cargo D e n s i t y Conversion Table i n Short Tons ( A r t i c l e
830)
8. 15 M/T and S/T Conversion Factors by Supply Class (Article
830)
8.16 D e n s i t y Conversion Factors for Supply Categories of
Material (Ten Classes) (Article 830)
8.17 M/T and SIT Conversion Factors for Certain Cargoes to
Vietnam (Article 830)

8.18 Liquid Conversion Factors Used in Shipload ing (60 F)

(A r t i c l e 831)
8.19 Maximum Permissible Deck Loads in Pounds per Square
Foo t ( A r t i c l e 8 3 4 )

8.20 Peacetime (Optimum ) Capacity in Measurement Tons (M/T)

of Cargo (Article 835 and 836)
8.21 Worldwide Tur naround Cycles from U.S. Ports (New York
and San Francisco ) for Notional Ships (No ASW) (Article
839)

8 . 2 2 Time Required for Steaming Various Distances at Speeds

Ranging from 8 to 20 kno t s ( Ar t i c l e 8 4 0 )
8 . 2 3 Un i form M a t e r i a l Movement and Issue P r i o r i t y System
( UMMI PS ) ( Ar t i c l e 841 , 842 , 843)

8 . 2 4 Vietnam Port Handling P l a n n i n g Factors ( S/T per Day )

( 1966 ) (A r t i cle 845 , 846 , 847 )
8.25 A i r c r a f t C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s (A r t i c l e 856)
8.26 A i r c r a f t Operational L i m i t a t i o n s (A r t i c l e 857 , 858)
8.27 Normal Gross Takeof f Payload a t N a u t i c a l Mile Range s
(A r t i cle 859)
8.28 worldwide L o g i s t i c a l A e r i a l Ports ( A r t i c l e 860)

8.29 General C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of Helicopters (Article 861)

8.30 Maximum Payload C a p a b i l i t y of H e l i c o p t e r s at Sea Level
and STD Temperature (59 F) ( A r t i c l e 861)
__________________ -~~~~~~-~~

8.31 Maximum Payload Capability of Helicopters at 50

Nautical Mile Radius (Article 861)
8.32 Shortterm Movement Capability for Pavement or Surface
Type s ( Section 870)
8.33 Short-term Movement C a p a b i l i t y for Hi ghway Type s
(Section 870)

8.34 Maximum Number of Day s of Short-te rm Movements by

Pavement or Surface Types (Section 870)
8.35 Truck Capabilities Maximum (A r t i c l e 871)
8.36 Characteristics of Rolling Stock (Article 872 , 873 )

8.37 Rou tes Covered by MSC Container Agre ements (Article

888 )

9.1 Landing Craf t Characteristics (Section 910)

9.2 River Assualt Craft Characteristics (Section 910 , 920,

930 )
9.3 C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of Pontoon Barges (Article 941 , 942)
9.4 Cargo and Troop Capacity of Selected Amphibiou s Ships
and C r a f t ( S e c t i o n 9 5 0 )

9.5 Specialized Mobile Units Tactical Support Units

(Amphibious) (Pacific) (Section 960)
9.6 Specialized Mobile Uni ts Tactical Support Units
(Amphibious) (Atlantic) (Section 960)
9.7 Specialized Mobile Units Tactical Suppo r t U n i t s (Mine
Warfare Forces ) (Section 960)

9.8 Specialized Mobile Units Ordnance Support Units (EOD )

(Section 960)

9.9 Specialized Mobile Units O r d n a n c e S up p or t Units

(Miscellaneous) (Section 960)

A r t i c l e s 1021 , 1031 , 1032 , 1033 , 1035
10.1 Admission Rate (Admission per 1 ,000 Strength per Day )
(Article 1041)
10.2 Wounded in Action Admission Rate for Specific
Operations ( Admissions per 1,000 S t r ength per Day )
(A r t i c l e 1041 , 1042 , 1043 , 1044)

El0

--- - - - - ---
~~ - - --- ~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~
10.3 U.S. Naval Hospital Ship Capacities (Article 1045)
10.4 Army World War II and Korean War E x p e r i e n c e (Article
1046)
10.5 Navy/Marine Corps Vietnam Experience (Article 1046)

10.6 Casualty Carrying Capaci ty of Aircraft (Article 1047)

10.7 Evacuation Capacities of Fleet Amphibious Ships

(Article 1047)
10.8 Evacuation Capacities of MSC Troopcarrying Ships
(Article 1047)
11.1 Days of Supply
Pacific Theater (Section 1100)
11.2 Days of Supply Pacific Theater (Section 1100)

11.3 Days of Supply

Polar Regions (Section 1100)

11.4 Conversion Factors by Class of Supply (Articles 1101

and 1102 )
11.5 Characteris tics of Standard Army Rations (Section 1100)

11.6 Water Requirements (Section 1100)

11.7 Consumption Data for Supply Categories of Material (10

Classes) for Army ( Ar t i c l e 1103)

E11

_ -------- - - - - - - - ------ - -- --
 _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~ ~~~ - - ~~~ - ~~~ -- --~~~~~~~ - ~~~~~~ - - -- - - -~~~~-- -
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

APPENDIX F

Summary of I n t e r v i e w s

II

~~ -
_ _ _
_ _ _ _ _
~~~~~-
~

AP PEND IX F

Summa ry of Interview s
A. Navy CINC Logistics Planners CINCLANTFLT , CINCPACFLT,
and CINCUSNAVEUR Representatives
a. CINC Logistic Planners are the users of resupply
Logistics Planning Factors (LPF ) on the CINC staffs.
b. Resupply LPF5 are required to satisfy the CINC JOPS
planning requirements.

c. Table 1.5 of Logistics Reference Data, NAVMAT

P40002 is used as the source of resupply L1PFS and is the
only source available.
d. Resupply LPFs would be more resp onsive to CINC re-
q u i r e m e n t s if they were adapted to JOPS i n p u t re-
quirements.

B. Navy Logistics Planning Factor Sponsors Naval Supply

Systems Command Headquarters (NAVSUP ), Naval Facilities

Engineerin g Command Headquarters (NAVFAC ), Naval Sea Systems

Command Headquarters (NAVSEA), Naval Air Systems Command

Headquarters (NAVAIR), Naval Electronics Systems Command
Headquarters (NAVELEX), Bureau of Medicine and Surgery

(BUMED), Military Sealift Command (MSC ), and Office of the

Chief of Naval Operations, Ordnance and Energy Management

Branches

a. Sponsors are responsible for the development and

main tenance of LPFs.

F- 2

-
 b. Documen tation of rationale and methodology of cur-

rent LPFs is l imited to that described in Logistics

Reference Data, NAVMAT P40002. The descriptive data

contained in this publication was insufficient to permit

reconstruction of resupply factors.

c. Indivi duals who participated in the development of

Table 1.5 of Logistics Reference Data, NAVMAT P40002 are no

longer available.

d. Sponsors will provide support in the development of

new resupply LPFs.

e. Primary effort should be addressed to resupply LPFs

in Table 1.5 of Logistics Reference Data, NAVMAT P40002 and

in defining a me thodology to compute and maintain such

factors.

f. MSC validates the rationale and methodology used for

the development of the transportation planning factors on a

continuing basis.

C. Other Services

I n t e r v i ew s w i t h other S e r v i c e s to d e t e r m i n e t h e i r

methodology to deve lop resupply LPFs :

1. Army - Development and Readiness Command (DARCOM )
and P l a n n i n g Factors Management O f f i c e , T r a i n i n g and

Doctrine Comma nd (PF M O):

a. PFMO and DARCOM are the t~~ agencies i nvolved

wi th developing and coordinating Army LPFs .

b. Army items are classified into the ten major DOD

supply classes and seventyseven subclasses.

F 3
_ _ _

C. The methodology used in aggregation to

seventyseve n subclasses was essentially a manual

identification of each line i t e m which took five years to

complete.

d. Responsibility for computing LPFs for use in the

Army is centralized at the PFMO .

e. Because rationale and supporting methodology is

not identifiable, current Army LPF credibility is

ques t ione d , and P FMO is in the process of iden t i f y ing a

validation method .

2. Air Force Air Force Logistics Com mand

a. Plannin g factors are currently unde r review .

b. Air Force inform ation and procedures are under

review and would not be useful to the Navy .

D. Navy Food Services Systems Office , Washington , D.C.

(NFSSO)

a. NFSSO has Navy Subsistence (Class I) consumption

data by FSC and ship type by weight and cube.

b. NF SSO has planning factors which reflect surface

uni t and submarine usage.

c. Since NFSSO finds there is little variance in sub

sistence consumption , planning factors are representative

and require minimal upd ating .

d. Planning factors for Subsistence (Class I) w e r e

valida ted in F? 1976 and factors for submarines are being

revised.

F-4
 ~~~~ -~~~~~~~~~~~~ - .
~~~~~~~~~~ - - . -- -- - - _ _

-
APPENDIX G

CLASSIFICATION MATRIX

__ _ _
_ _ _ _ -- .- -
- - --- -- -
ADeAO 55 752 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPE!ATIONS WASHINSTON D C F/S 15/5 N
1 (U)
Rt T ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~
UNCLASSIFIED

055752 ____________ ____________ ____________

U _
END END
0*1 1 DA T E

g78 578
DEC DEC

I
j
 1O ~
__________ o 1315 22

4 4 i:~ L 20
1.1
~~~~ =
L
:
I
_ _ _ _ _

111125 l uI i
*
i-A-

~~
~

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

~ C~OCOPY NESO4.U1ION TEST GH~~T
r p.

Table G1

Navy Cognizance Symbol to JOPS Classification

18 x 28 x 4A IXA 5L IXG 6A D 8A d 9A IXK 01 lIE

11 lIE 2C x 4E VA 5M IXG 6E x 8E VA 9C x OK lIE
IQ VI 2E VA 4G IXG 5N IXG 6G IIB 88 IXG 9D II? OP l IE
1R IXA 2F VIIG 4}I IXK 5P D 68 D 8M IIB 9E lIE OX x
28 x 4J 118 5R IXT 6M IIB 8N VIIB 9F IXA
21 VI IM 4M IIB 60 IIB 8? D 9G x
2M VIIB 4N x 6? D 8R x 98 IXM
20 IIB 40 IXB 6R VIIB 8S 1W 91 IXA
2? D 4? D 6T 1W 8T 1W 9J IXA
2R x 4R IXB 6U x 8U VA 9K IXA
2S x 1W
4T 6V IXA 8X D 9I
~
VIII
2T VW 4U IXM 6XD 9Mx
2U IXL 4V IXA 9N IXG
2V IIB 4X D 90 x
2W IIB 4Z IXA 9Q lIE
2XD 9S IXL
2Z VIIG 9V IXA
9W IXA
9X x
9Y IXG
9Z IXT

D = Delete (FEM/Nuclear) Appear to fall directly

into DOD subclass 62
x DOD Subclass Depends DOD Subclass Appears to
on FSC Depend on FSC 15
Deleted (FBM ) 12
TOTAL

Matrix examination indicates that of the eighty-nine COG symbols

sixty-ts~ can be identified directly to a single JOPS class/subclass

of supply, fifteen can be categorized to JOPS class/subclass of supply

depending upon the particular FSC , and twelve can be deleted because

they deal wi th nuclear weaons and FBM materiel .

G-2
 P

APPENDIX H

DODMDS Data Base

- .
~~~~~ - -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~ ~~~~~~
 APPENDIX H

DODMDS Da t a Base
The purpose of the 000MDS stud y is to analy ze the De-

partment of Defense materiel distribution system and op-

timize the number of supply depots. The DOI~4DS data base is

composed of several different types of data files , both in

terms of the extent of data processing required to produce

them and in information content referring to such data as

catalog data , r e q u i s i t ion data , or requisi t ion data with

appended catalog data. Extent of data processing refers to

the number of steps of extracting , sorting , me rging , and

aggregating required to produce a particular file from raw

source files.

There are five main types of data files which comprise

the DODMDS data base and each file type is characterized by

organizational identity , record forma t, record sequence , and

i n f o r m a t i o n a l content or functional use. Each type of f i l e

is described be low :

The f i r s t main f i l e s are the source f i l e s , which

contain the data files requested by and sent to the DODMDS
Stud y Group by the variou s f i e l d act i v i t i e s of DOD
services/agencies including Navy ICPs .

The second main f i l e s are the extract f i l e s created

from selected data elements of the source f i l e s . The orde r
of records is not ch a nged during t h i s process and the re-
s u l t a n t f i l e s remain grouped by o r i g i n a l service/ agency .

8-2
F-
~~~~~~~
_ _

The extracted data elements contain the s~~ e characters as

were in the source f i l e . The f i r s t p a s s extract f i l e is
created w i t h o u t any consideration of the meaning or v a l i d i t y
of the characters comprising each data element. Subsequent
processing steps v a l i d a t e the content of each of the data
f i e l d s , f i l l voids according to specified rules , or reject
the invalid records to special exception f i l e s for separate
analyses.

The t h i r d m a i n f i l e s are the in termediate f i l e s

consisting of a depot shipments f i l e , a catalog f i l e , a
t r a n s p o r t a t i o n f i l e, and a contract f i l e . The contents of
these f i l e s are rough ly analog ou s to the source f i l e s, are
p r i m a r i l y of interest to DODMDS , and i n d i c a t e h~ i the
preparation of the data base was organized into discrete ,
v e r i f i a b l e tasks.

The fourth f i l e s are the master transaction f i l e s

and the master reference f i l e s . The DODMDS data preparation
effort culminates with the creation of these files inclu-

ding :

DODMDS Master Transact ..on Files

1. Depot shipments master file (wholesale)

2. Depot procurement receipts (D4) master file (wholesale)
3. Depot nonprocurement receipts (D6) master f i l e
( wholesale)
4. Direct delive ry shipments (B2) master f i l e ( wholesale)
5. Depot detail shipn ents issue s m a s t e r f i l e
6. Depot r e t a i l procurement receipts master f i l e
7. Depot retail nonpr ocurement receipts m a s t e r f i l e

H-3
~ ~ .~~ -~~~~~~ _ _ _

DODMDS Master Reference Files

1. Catalog master f i l e
2. Customer master f i l e
3. DCASR (vendor/ contractor) master f i l e
4. DLSC Freight data master file
5. NSN/DODMDS Product grou p crossreference file
6. Re t a i l , asset ( l o c a t i o n/ s t a t u s ) master f i l e
7. Wholesale, asset (location/status) master file

The fifth file within the DODMDS data includes the

special analyses f i le s which were created to perform tasks
s p e c i f i c a l l y related to DODMD S purposes.

The DODMDS M i n i Ship I f i l e forms the ba sis for

the DODMDS NSN aggregation . Attachment 1. presents the
specific data elements of t h i s f i l e.

The time period covered by the DODMD S data base is

twe lve months ( 1 October 1974 through 30 September 1975 .
~

8-4

.. . - - -
~~ ~ .- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
.
 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Attachment 1
DODMDS Data Elements (Mini Ship I)*

1. NSN (FSC/NIIN )

2. Document Number

3. DOD~ AC (Ship to UI C )

4. P r i o r i t y Designator
5. Requisition Receipt Date (ICP )

6. Shipping Depo t
7. Q u a n t i t y Shipped
8. Date Available for Shipment
9. Date Shipped
10. Mode
11. Ty pe of Action Code
12. MRO Generation Date
13. Price
14. Source of Supply
15. Security Code
16. R e p a i r a b i l i t y
17. Management Control
18. TL Cl ass
19. LTL Cl ass
20. CL Cl ass
21. W a t e r Commodi ty Code
22. Type Cargo Code
23. U n i t Pack Lengt h
2 4 . U n i t Pa ck Width

1 8-5

_ _ _ _ _

-- -.- -- ,- .. - .. - - - . - ,.----
-- .-
- . - - - ----
~~~ - -~~~~~ -.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ .- - . - ---~~~~ .
 25. U n i t Pack Depth
26. Uni t Weigh t

27. U n i t Cube
28. Customer Number

29. ZIP
30. Service Code
31. ICP Code
32. Produc t Number
33. Catalog Data Flag

* Created from Wholesale Shipnent f il e . Fo rms basis of NSN

rollup. Also used for Retail Shipments.

8-6

L . .
~~~~~~
.
..
~~~~~~~
. -
 P

APPENDIX I

JCS Publication 6 Vol. II Part S Chapt I

 P
TABL E 23
SUPPLY CLASSSUBCLASS CODES
Supply Class (G cc 47)
1 Subsistence (Food)
2 Clothing i n di v i d u a l equipu ent
tentage , organizational too l
sets and tool k i t s, hand tools
and a d m i n i s tr a t i v e and house
ke eping supplies and equipnent.
3 POL: Petroleum , fuels , lub ri
cants , h y d r a u l i c and i n s u la t i n g
oils , preserva t ive s, liquid and
compressed gases , bulk chemical
products, coolants, deicing and
a n t i f r e e z e compoundsplus compo-
nents and additives of such pro-
duct s, inc luding coal.
4 Construction: Construction
materials including installed
equipment and all fortification/
barrier materials .
12
Subclass (G cc 48)
A Air (inflight rations)
R Refrigerated subsistence
S - Nonrefrigerated subsistence
(less combat rations)
C Combat rations ( i n c l ud e s
g r a t u i t ou s health and w e l f a r e
items )
B Ground support material (i n
cludes power generators and
construction, b a r r i e r, b r idg
ing, f i r e f i g h t i n g , petroleum ,
and mapping equipo ent)
E General s u p p l i e s
F C l o t h i n g and t e x t i l e s
M Weap ons
T Industrial supplies (e.g.,
bearings , block and tackl e ,
cable , chain , wire rop e , scr ew s,
bolts, stud s, steel rods ,
plates , and bars )
A Air
W Ground ( s u r f a c e )
None
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

TABL E 23

SUPPLY CLASSSUBCLA SS CODES

Supply Class (G cc 47) Subclass (G cc 48)

5 Ammunition: Ammunition of all A Air
type s ( i n c lu d i ng chemical , bi o-
logical , radiological, and W Ground
special we a p on s ) , bombs ,
e xplosive s , mines , f u z e s,
detonators , pyrotechnics ,
missiles , rockets, propel
l a n t s , and other associated
items .
6 Personal Demand Items None
(N o n m i l i t ary Sale Items)
7 Major End I t e m s : A f i n a l A Air
combination of end product s
ready for its intended use ; B Ground support material ( in
e . g . , launchers , t a n k s , cludes power generators and
mobile ma chine shops, and construction , barrier, bridg
vehicles ing , firefighting , petroleum ,
an mappi ng equipnent)
D A d m i n i s t r a t i v e vehicles (com-
mercial vehicles used in
a d m i n i s t r a t i v e motr pools )
G Electronics
K - Tact ical vehicles
I. Missiles
M Weapons

N - Special we apons
8 Medical m at e r i a l , includ i ng None
medical peculiar repair parts
9 Repair Parts (Less Medical A Air
P e c u l i a r R epair Parts) : All
repair parts and comp onents, B Groun d support m at e r i a l (in
including k i t s , assemblies, cludes power generators and
and subassemblies (repairable construction , barrier , br idg
and nonrepairable) required ing , f i r e f i g h t in g , petroleum ,
for maintenance support for and mapping e q u i p m e n t )
all equipment.
1-3 ~~~~~

.
_

TABL E 2 3
SUPPLY CLASS-SUBCLASS CODES
Supply Class (G cc 47)
9 (continued)
0 (10) Material to support
Nonmili tary progr~ ns;
e.g., agricul t ural and
economic development not
included in classes 1
through 9.
1 4
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Subclass (G cc 48)
D Administrative vehicles (com-
me rcial vehicles used in
administrative motor pools)
G Electronics
K Tactical vehicles
L Missiles
M - Weapons
N Special Weapons
T Industrial supplies (e.g.,
bearings , block and tackle,
cable , chain , wire , rope ,
screws , bolts, studs, steel
rods , plates, and bars )
None
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 _
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

APPENDIX J
Glossary

L..
~~~~~~
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 a.

APPENDIX J
Glossary

ABFC Advanced Base Functional Component

ADP Automatic Data Processing

AFLC Air Force Logistics Command

AVGA S Avia tion Gasoline

BUMED Bureau of Medicine and Surgery (Navy )

CARESS Enhanced Contingency Ammunition

Requirements and Supportability System

CIF Combat Intensity Factor

CINC CommanderinChief

CINCLAN T Commander-inChief Atlantic

CINCLANTFLT CommanderinChief Atlantic Fleet

CINCPAC CommanderinChief Pacific

CINCPA CFLT CommanderinChief Pacific Fleet

CINCUSNAVEUR CommanderinChief U.S. Nava l Force s

Europe

CNO Chief of Naval Operations

CONU S Continental Uni ted St ates

DARCOM Development and Readiness Command (Army )

DEPREP Deploymen t Reporting System , Joint Opera-

tion Planning System

DLA Defense Logistics Agen cy

DODMDS Department of Defense Materiel Distribu-

tion Study
FRG Force R e q u i r e m e n t s Generator of the Joint
Operation Planning System

J-2

L _ _ _ . -- .
. . . .
_
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ - -- - . , . .... . --
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

FSC Federal Supply Class

FWMAF Free World Military Assistance Forces

GSA General Services Administration
ICP Inventory Control Point
JOPS Joint Operation Planning System
JSCP Joint Strategic C a p a b i l i t i e s Plan
JSOP Joint S t r a t e g i c Object ives Plan
LAD Latest Available Date
LOG DA Logistics Data
LPF Logistic Planning Factor
LT Long ton
MOGA S Motor Gasoline
MR G Movement Requirements Generator of the
Joint Operation Planning System
MSC Military Sealift Command

MT Measurement ton

NARDAC Navy Regional Dat a Automation Center ,

Washington , D.C.
NAVAIR Naval Air Systems Command
NAVE LEX Naval Electronics Systems Command
NAVFAC Naval Facilities Engineering Command
NAVMAT Naval Material Command
NAVMEDt4ATSUPPCOM Naval Medical Material Support Command
NAVSEA Nava l Sea Systems Command
NAVSUP Naval Supply Systems Command

NFSSO Navy Food Service Systems Office

NuN National Item Identification Number

NN OR NonNuclear Ordnance Requirements (Navy )

_ _ U

-- -~~~~~~~ - - -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - ~~~~~~ -~~~~~ -- -.~~~~~~

~ -.- - - - ~~~~- .-
--.

NRSO Navy Resale Systems Office , Brooklyn , NY

NSN National Stock Number

NWIP Naval W a r f a r e I n f o r m a t i o n Publication

OJC S Organization of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

OPLA N Operation Plan

PFF Planning Factors File used in the Joint

Operation Planning System
PFMO Army Planning Factors Management O f f i c e ,
Training and Doctrine Command
POD Port of Debarkation
POE Port of Embarkation
POL Petroleum
POM Program Object ives Memorandum
PWRMS Prepositioned War Reserve Ma teriel Stock

SM System Monitor of the Joint Operation

Planning System

SPCC Ships Parts Control Center ,

Me chanicsburg, Pennsylvania
ST Short ton
TFE Transportation Feasibility Estimator of
the Joint Operation Planning System

TPFD D T ime Phased Force Deployment Data

TPTRL Time phased T r a n s por t a t i o n R equirements
Li s t

UIC Un i t Identification Code

UICP Unifo rm Inventory Control Progran
USAF U.S . Air Force

UTC Uni t Type Code

J-4
 -,- .
.-. -~~~~~~-. ~~~ . .

WRMR War Reserve Materiel Requirements

WRM S War Reserv e Materiel Stock
WWMCCS Worldwide M i l i t ar y Command and Control
System

I
APPENDIX K
Bibliography

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


AP PENDIX K
Bibliography

Armed Forces Staff College, JOPS Users Conference, Norfolk ,

Virginia , 2730 June 1977.
Briefing of RADM Joh n thase, th ariman, Advi sory Committee ,
21 June 1977.
Chi e f of Naval Material Letter, Subject: Logisics Reference
Data, NAVMAT P40002 , serial O43 lE , NAB , 11 May 1976.
Defense Supply Agency , Federal Supply C l a s s i f i c a t i o n, Cata-
loging Handbook, Part I, Groups an~ Classes , January 1977.
Eceles, Henry E., Logistics in the National Defense, The
Stackpole Company , Harrisburg , PA , 1959.

Goldstein , Alan J., Logistics Planning Factors, T h e i r Uses

and Misuse s, A ir Force I n s t i t u t e of Technology .
J o i n t C h i e f s of S t a f f , P u b l i c a t i o n 6 , Vol. I I , Chapter I ,
Part 5.
Joint C h i e f s of St a f f , Joint Operations Planning System
(JOPS ), Vols. I and II.

Logistic Reference Data, NAVMAT P40002, 30 September 1973

(Confidential).

Memorandum for th~ Record of AFLC discussions.

Memorandum for the Record of BUMED discussions , 22 June

1977.

Memorandum for the Record of CINCUSNAVEUR discussions, 27

June 1977.
Memorandum for t h e Record of DARCOM discussions , 23 June
1977.
Memorandum fo r the Record of DODMDS discussions, 7 September
1977.
Memorandum for the Record of MSC discussions, 22 J une 1977.
Memorandum for the Record of NFSSO discussions , 18 August
1977.
Memorandum for the Record of Navy Petroleum O f f i c e di scus-
s ions , 15 September 1977.
K- 2

. -~~~~ . -~~~ .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - - -~~~~~~

 Memorandum for the Record of CNM Stratification meeting on
secondary item procedures , 27 July 1977.

Memorandum for the Record of OPNAV4l1 discussions , 23 Jun e

1977.
NAVCOSSACT, Enhanced Contingency Ammunition Requirements and
Supportability System, 53E233, UMOl , February 1977.

Navy Inspector General Re port , Command Inspection of

CINCPACFL T He adq uarters, Subject : C r e d i b i l i t y of OPLA N
Resupply Planning , 41476 (Confidential), 717 September
1976

NAVSUP ,Supply Management Program Standard Data Element

Dictionary, P u b l i c at i o n 508 , 4 J a n u a r y 1974.
Report of Study Group Meeting , 8 J uly 1977.
T r ip Report , CINCLANTFLT , 19 August 1977.
Trip Report , CINCPACFLT , 20 M ay 1977 (Confidential).
Trip Report , USA Planning Factor Management O f f i c e , TRADOC ,
9 J une 1977.
U .S . Army , Classes of Supply, Arm y Field Manual , FM 3824,
March 1976.

U.S. Navy , NonNuclear Ordnance Requirements, OPNAVNOTE

C8000, 21 September 1976, 4 idOLs. (Confidential).

I __
X-3

-- L..
_ _

.. -
.- .
~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~
 APPENDIX L
Membershi p of the S tudy Group

_ _
~
,- . . .. -----

* S

MEMBERSHIP OF THE STUDY GROUP

Mr. B. A. Cruber , (OP-40 1G) Study Project Officer 695-5109

LCDR J . B. Sewell , (OP-964C2) Study Monitor 697-5807

CDR J . G. Jefferson , OP605E3 6952928

c~DR W. P. Sutherland , OP405C 1 697-94 13

Mr. L. F. Gray , OP41C 695 6125

LCDR D. G. Lubash , OP- b iD 694-1438

CAPT R. A. Packard (USMC ) , LPP-2 HQMC 695-0202

Mr. R. Hallmark , NAVMAT043 6927924

Mr. S. Born e , NAVSEA0042 6923726

Mr. M. Cost ello , NAVSEA09B3 6920532

Mr. L. H . Denburg, NAVAIR40 1 6922881

Mr. E. Panigot , !~AVAI R4 12iB 1 6920028

Mr. R. G iarra t ana , NAVEL EX-5042 692-8972

Mr. W. T. Henry , NAVFAC062 1B 3259110

Mr. G. Lancaster , NAVSUP 0421 6955728

Mr. L. Morgan , NARDAC 433-3929

Mr. B. Besore , NARDAC 4333929

Mr. E. V an L euven , NAV14EDMATSUPPC OM AV-443-8775

Mr. C. Williams , COMSC M 6].

B 2822897

1
~~

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
j