Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

COPYRIGHT 2004 BY THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, INCORPORATED

Phantom-Limb Pain Due to


Cervical Spinal Tuberculosis
A CASE REPORT
BY YOGESH K. PITHWA, MS(ORTH), DNB(ORTH), D(ORTH),
AND S. RAJASEKARAN, PHD, FRCS(ED), MCH(ORTH), MS(ORTH), DNB(ORTH), D(ORTH)

Investigation performed at Ganga Medical Centre and Hospitals, Coimbatore, India

P
hantom-limb sensations refer to the phenomenon of good general condition. Examination of the stump revealed no
feeling the presence of an amputated limb. Phantom- evidence of infection, undue osseous prominences, scar tender-
limb pain refers to the sensation of pain in this limb. ness, or neuroma formation. The range of motion of the elbow
This is a form of deafferentation pain, which refers to pain and shoulder was normal. Examination of the cervical spine re-
originating from neural injury. In a survey study by Sherman vealed slight tenderness overlying the posterior aspects of the
et al. of 2694 patients who had had an amputation, phantom C5 and C6 vertebrae, without any notable paraspinal muscle
sensations were reported by 2101 patients (78%) postopera- spasm. The range of movement of the cervical spine was normal
tively1; 1282 (61%) of those patients reported a decrease of
this phenomenon over an average period of twenty-six years.
In a retrospective study of 176 patients who had undergone
amputation of a lower limb, Houghton et al. reported that
phantom sensations were experienced by 141 patients (80%)
and phantom pain, by 134 (76%)2. However, only thirty-eight
patients (22%) reported severe phantom pain.
Phantom-limb pain and sensations can be primary or
secondary. Primary phantom pain and sensations start in the
immediate postoperative period after the amputation. Sec-
ondary phantom-limb problems start after an asymptomatic
interval following the amputation and are usually indicative of
the onset of a new disease unrelated to the primary cause of
the amputation3-14. We report the case of a young man who
underwent amputation of an upper limb after trauma. Sec-
ondary phantom-limb pain developed two and one-half years
later, as a result of an epidural tubercular abscess that affected
the cervical spine. Our patient was informed that data con-
cerning the case would be submitted for publication.

Case Report
thirty-two-year-old man sustained a crush injury of the left
A forearm and hand and the medial four digits of the right
hand in a motor-vehicle accident. A guillotine-type below-the-
elbow amputation was performed on the left side and was fol-
lowed by secondary closure at a later date. The patient had no
stump-related problems and received adequate rehabilitation.
He then returned to his job as a lottery-ticket salesman. Two
and one-half years later, phantom-limb sensations developed in
the left upper limb. This uncomfortable sensation progressed to
pain within a few days. The pain was distributed along the lat-
eral border of the forearm up to the tip of the phantom thumb. Fig. 1
The patient returned to the hospital after failure of symptom- A lateral cervical radiograph showing loss of the disc space at the C5-
atic therapy prescribed by his general practitioner. C6 level (arrow) and mild retrospondylolisthesis of the C5 vertebra over
The physical examination revealed that the patient was in the C6 vertebra.

THE JOUR NAL OF BONE & JOINT SURGER Y JBJS.ORG P H A N T O M -L I M B P A I N D U E T O
VO L U M E 86-A N U M B E R 6 J U N E 2004 C E R V I C A L S P I N A L TU B E R C U L O S I S

in all directions, and the patient reported slight pain at the pos- up evaluation, he was completely free of all symptoms, includ-
terior aspect of the neck on terminal extension. There was no ing phantom-limb sensations.
objective evidence of a motor or sensory deficit. The general ex-
amination revealed enlarged, matted cervical lymph nodes on Discussion
the left side. he management of phantom-limb pain depends on
Hematological investigations showed a moderate lym-
phocytosis and an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate of
T whether the problem is primary or secondary. Primary
phantom-limb pain is often refractory to treatment. Medica-
48 mm/hr (normal range, 0 to 30 mm/hr). The Mantoux test tions such as antidepressants, transcutaneous electrical nerve
was positive, with induration extending up to 16 mm. The stimulation15, thermocoagulation of the dorsal-root entry
results of the sputum examination were negative for the zone16, or epidural spinal cord stimulation17 may be used, but
presence of acid-fast bacilli. A radiograph of the chest no one therapy is uniformly successful1. Unlike primary phan-
showed that the lungs were clear. Radiographs of the cervical tom-limb pain, secondary phantom-limb pain can be treated
spine showed loss of the disc space between the C5 and C6 more successfully by the appropriate management of the incit-
vertebrae. There was mild retrospondylolisthesis of the C5 ing abnormality. A herniated intervertebral disc has been
vertebra in relation to the C6 vertebra (Fig. 1). Magnetic res- reported to trigger phantom-limb pain4. Phantom pain sec-
onance imaging revealed an epidural abscess in the interver- ondary to spinal cord injury and spinal anesthesia has also
tebral foramen between C6 and C7 (Fig. 2) but no notable been reported5-8. Phantom pain has also developed in patients
compression of the spinal cord. A 24-gauge hypodermic nee- who had lesions of the contralateral cerebral hemisphere and
dle was used to perform a fine-needle aspiration of fluid sensory loss9. Angina referred to a phantom limb has also been
from the matted cervical lymph nodes, and the diagnosis of described13,14. In addition, diabetic neuropathy has been re-
tuberculosis was confirmed on cytologic examination of the ported as a cause for this entity12. Chang et al. reported the
aspirate. worsening of phantom-limb pain as a result of neoplasia af-
Because the patient had only slight local symptoms and fecting the L4 vertebra10. The onset of phantom-limb pain
because no major cord compression was evident, we treated the years after resection of a limb also has been shown to be one of
patient nonoperatively with antituberculous therapy, which in- the first symptoms of recurrent disease in the pelvis11.
cluded four drugs (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and To our knowledge, this is the first report of a patient
ethambutol) for two months and two drugs (isoniazid and with phantom-limb problems caused by tuberculosis of the
rifampicin) for another four months. The phantom pain de- cervical spine and an epidural abscess. Protracted presenta-
creased within three weeks after initiation of the antitubercu- tions of spinal tuberculosis are known to occur in patients
lous drugs, and the patient reported good relief of symptoms by who have good immunity. This would explain the fact that the
the end of six weeks. He continued to have intermittent phan- presenting symptom in our patient was phantom-limb pain
tom sensations for about three months. At the one-year follow- rather than any notable local symptoms. Because of the lack of

Fig. 2
An axial T1 weighted magnetic resonance imag-
ing section showing an epidural abscess (ar-
rows) in the intervertebral foramen at the C6-
C7 vertebral level.

THE JOUR NAL OF BONE & JOINT SURGER Y JBJS.ORG P H A N T O M -L I M B P A I N D U E T O
VO L U M E 86-A N U M B E R 6 J U N E 2004 C E R V I C A L S P I N A L TU B E R C U L O S I S

severe local symptoms and the absence of spinal cord com- Yogesh K. Pithwa, MS(Orth), DNB(Orth), D(Orth)
pression, there was no absolute indication for surgery. Hence, S. Rajasekaran, PhD, FRCS(Ed), MCh(Orth), MS(Orth),
we adopted a nonoperative approach, which was successful. DNB(Orth), D(Orth)
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Unit, Ganga Medical Centre
Because of the direct association between the cervical tubercu- and Hospitals, Swarnambika Layout, Ramnagar, Coimbatore 641 009,
losis and the onset of phantom-limb problems, treatment of India. E-mail address for S. Rajasekaran: rajaorth@eth.net
the tuberculosis was successful in addressing the secondary
phantom-limb problems as well. The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support
In conclusion, the development of progressive phantom- of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not
limb symptoms in an amputation stump after an asymptom- receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement
to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial
atic period may indicate an abnormality proximal to the limb. entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to
Appropriate management of the underlying abnormality may any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other char-
be a successful way of treating the secondary phantom-limb itable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated
symptoms as well.  or associated.

References
1. Sherman RA, Sherman CJ, Parker L. Chronic phantom and stump pain 10. Chang VT, Tunkel RS, Pattillo BA, Lachmann EA. Increased phantom limb
among American veterans: results of a survey. Pain. 1984;18:83-95. pain as an initial symptom of spinal-neoplasia. J Pain Symptom Manage.
1997;13:362-4. Erratum in: J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997;14:135.
2. Houghton AD, Nicholls G, Houghton AL, Saadah E, McColl I. Phantom pain:
natural history and association with rehabilitation. Ann Coll Surg Engl. 1994; 11. Roth YF, Sugarbaker PH. Pain sensations after amputations: character and
76:22-5. clinical significance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61:490.
3. Melzack R. Phantom limbs. Scientific American. 1992;266:90-6. 12. Rajbhandari SM, Jarratt JA, Griffiths PD, Ward JD. Diabetic neuropathic pain
in a leg amputated 44 years previously. Pain. 1999;83:627-9.
4. Finneson BE, Haft H, Krueger EG. Phantom limb syndrome associated with
herniated nucleus pulposus. J Neurosurg. 1957;14:344-6. 13. Deenadayalan CV. Anginal pain in a phantom limb. Br Med J. 1976;2:228.
5. Bors E. Phantom limbs of patients with spinal cord injury. AMA Arch Neurol 14. Mester SW, Cintron GB, Long C. Phantom angina. Am Heart J. 1988;116:
Psychiatry. 1951;66:610-31. 1627-8.
6. Sweet WH. Phantom sensations following intraspinal injury. Neurochiru- 15. Morrison JD. Amputations and prostheses. In: Bulstrode CJK, Buckwalter
rgia. 1975;18:139-54. J, Carr A, Fairbank J, Marsh L, editors. Oxford textbook of orthopedics and
trauma. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. p 1496-511.
7. Mackenzie N. Phantom limb pain during spinal anaesthesia. Recurrence in
amputees. Anaesthesia. 1983;38:886-7. 16. Samii M, Moringlane JR. Thermocoagulation of the dorsal root entry zone for
the treatment of intractable pain. Neurosurgery. 1984;15:953-5.
8. Sellick BC. Phantom limb pain and spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology.
1985;62:801-2. 17. Kumar K, Toth C, Nath RK, Laing P. Epidural spinal cord stimulation for treat-
ment of chronic painsome predictors of success. A 15-year experience.
9. Appenzeller O, Bicknell JM. Effects of nervous system lesions on phantom
Surg Neurol. 1998;50:110-21.
experience in amputees. Neurology. 1969;19:141-6.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi