Chilean Mining Investments-Project Portfolio 2015-2024 PDF

Chilean Mining Investments
Project Portfolio 2015 -2024

DEPP 13/2015
Intellectual Property Registry

#256,643
Chilean Mining Investments Project Portfolio 2015 -2024 1
Brief
The objective of this Assessment is to show the updated portfolio of mining projects in Chile, the
estimate of investments required to carry it out in the 2015- 2024 period, and the impact upon the
production capacity which the resulting productive contribution would have from the investing
processes which would be registered in the aforementioned period up to 2024.
The portfolio is made up of two groups of initiatives, the first of which correspond to those projects
with a greater probability of materializing in the timeframes indicated by the owning companies,
which are those in a base and probable condition, a total of 24 initiatives assessed in $31,345 million
USD.
Furthermore, the second group of projects corresponds to those in a possible and potential
condition, meaning mining investments with lesser probability of materializing in the time frames
established by the owners, as well as those prone to being affected by changes in market conditions,
which total 18 initiatives assessed in $45,945 million USD.
The most important part of this project portfolio is not the global value thereof, rather the
composition in terms of the number of initiatives, those driving them, their objectives, their
location, and the efforts being made to carry them out.
Upon analyzing the investments within the investment portfolio, three phases can be identified:
- Investment already raised, which corresponds to $15,415 million USD, or 19.9% of the
current portfolio,
- The investment to be raised during the next five year period, 2015-2019, for $44,894 million
USD, equaling 58.1% of the portfolio, with an average yearly investment of $8,979 million
USD,
- The remainder to be invested in the 2020-2024 period, during which those projects whose
commissioning is anticipated to happen during that time have an investment total which
reaches $16,981 million USD, equaling 22% of the investment portfolio.
Within the investment to be raised during the next five year period, the project group with the base
and probable conditions make up 40% of the investment, with an average rate of $3,592 million
USD. Likewise the group of initiatives in possible and potential conditions make up the remaining
60%, with an annual investment average of $5,386 million USD.
This investment primarily seeks to increase the productive capacity, which translates into an
increase in the supply available to the international market.
In the case of copper, and considering the horizon through 20261, Chile has the potential to reach a
maximum copper production of 7.56 million tons of copper, 31.6% above the production registered
1
Two years after the last year of the commissioning thereof as registered in this portfolio.
Chilean Copper Commission

in 2014, if all of the anticipated projects are carried out through 2024, wherein copper production
would reach approximately 7.84 million tons, a 36.3% increase over 2014 production.
It is worth noting that if only the initiatives with a base and probable condition are carried out, the
copper production of the country will fall by 6.4% to around 5.4 million tons of fine copper. If, to
this scenario, we add the materialization of the initiatives which are possible this would counteract
the loss in production, reaching 6.6 million tons of fine copper, a 15.4% production increase with
respects to 2014.
This increase in production would reflect a structural change in the type of final product of the
copper producing operations, as the maximum capacity of concentrate production would increase
by 2.84 million tons by 2026, a 72.7% increase from 2014, the production of SxEw cathodes would
diminish by 1.03 million tons, registering a decrease of 55.7% with respects to the same year.
In the case of gold, it is expected that by 2026 the maximum capacity of this metal could reach 80.5
tons of gold content, a 75% increase over the 46 tons registered in 2014, while the projects included
in this report with potential production of silver would reach 1,495 tpa of silver by 2026 over current
production, which in 2014, reached 1,572 tons of silver.
In the case of molybdenum, the principal by-product of copper mining, the maximum recovery
capacity of molybdenum will reach 95.6 thousand tpa by 2026, a 96% increase with respects to the
amount produced in 2014, which implies a yearly average rate of 5.3%.
The projects with primary production or by-production of iron considered in this report will
contribute 18.8mt of iron mineral by 2026, approximately 11.9 Mt of fine content, to reach a
maximum production of around 33.3 Mt of iron ore, which is an 80% increase with respects to the
quantity registered in 2014.
In the case of industrial minerals, there are two initiatives in the area of saltpeter, the first of which
would contribute 10,000 tpa of iodine equivalent, and around 1,293,000 tpa of NaNO3. The second
initiative would produce around 2,700 tpa of iodine, and 400,000 tpa of nitrates, including 20,000
tpa of boric acid.
It is interesting to point out that there is also an initiative to produce titanium dioxide (TiO2) at a
capacity which is estimated at 200 ktpa of concentrate (95% of TiO2).

Index
Brief. ....................................................................................................................................................1
Figure Index .........................................................................................................................................5
Table Index ..........................................................................................................................................6
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................7
2. Methodology ...............................................................................................................................9
2.1. Coverage ..............................................................................................................................9
2.2. Project attributes and conditions for their realizaton .........................................................9
2.2.1. Conditions for materialization ................................................................................9
2.2.2. Project type ...........................................................................................................10
2.2.3. Stage of advancement ..........................................................................................11
2.2.4. Procedure for Environmental Evaluation Service (SEA)........................................11
2.2.5. Time frame for commissioning .............................................................................11
2.3. Codelcos investment and information sources ................................................................12
2.4. Private mining investment and information sources ........................................................13
2.5. Methodological critera to estimate the commissioning date ...........................................14
2.6. Production capacity estimate of copper mine ..................................................................14
3. Investments in Chilean mining ..................................................................................................16
3.1. Conditionality of the projects ............................................................................................17
3.2. Investment purpose...........................................................................................................20
3.3. Regional investment ..........................................................................................................21
3.4. Investment per originating country ...................................................................................23
4. Estimate of yearly distribution of the project portfolio ............................................................26
4.1. Distribution of the investment in copper mining ..............................................................26
4.2. Distribution of the investment in gold, iron and industrial minerals ................................28
5. Estimate of the copper production capacity in Chile until 2026 ...............................................30
5.1. Maximum copper mining production capacity in Chile .....................................................30
5.1.1. Analysis of the hydrometallurgy production ........................................................32
5.1.2. Analysis of the concentrate production................................................................34
5.2. Maximum copper mining production capacity per region ................................................40

5.3. Global estimate of the production capacity of other minerals .........................................43

5.3.1. Production capacity of gold and silver ..................................................................44
5.3.2. Production capacity of molybdenum ....................................................................44
5.3.3. Production capacity of iron ...................................................................................45
5.3.4. Industrial minerals ................................................................................................46
6. Comparison of the project portfolios from 2015 and 2014 ......................................................47
7. Conclusions ................................................................................................................................54
Investment procedence .....................................................................................................54
Investment purpose...........................................................................................................55
Investment region..............................................................................................................55
Conditionality of the investment .......................................................................................55
Structural change in copper production ............................................................................56
ANNEX 1: Description of investment projects in copper mining ......................................................58
1. State copper mining projects ....................................................................................................58
1.1. Structural Projects of CODELCO - www.codelco.cl ............................................................58
2. Projects of the large private copper mines ...............................................................................65
2.1. Projects of Anglo American - www.angloamerican.com ..................................................65
2.2. Projects of Antofagasta Minerals - www.antofagasta.co.uk ............................................66
2.3. Projects of BHP Billiton - www.bhpbilliton.com ..............................................................72
2.4. Project of Capstone Mining - www.capstonemining.com ................................................74
2.5. Projects of Lunding Mining - www.lundinmining.com ....................................................75
2.6. Projects of Teck - www.teck.com .....................................................................................78
3. Projects of the medium copper mines ......................................................................................81
3.1. Project of Amerigo Resources - www.amerigoresources.com ..........................................81
3.2. Project of COPEC - www.empresascopec.cl .....................................................................82
3.3. Project of Hot Chili - www.hotchili.net.au ........................................................................83
3.4. Projects of Pucobre - www.pucobre.cl ..............................................................................84
4. Metallurgy Plant Projects ..........................................................................................................85
4.1. Project of Codelco - www.codelco.cl .................................................................................85
4.2. Project of LS-Nikko Copper ................................................................................................86
ANNEX 2: Description of the investment projects in gold and silver mining ....................................87

1. Project of Atacama Pacific Gold - www.atacamapacific.com ...................................................87

2. Projects of Barrick Gold - www.barrick.com .............................................................................88
3. Project of Exeter Resource Corp. - www.exeterresource.com ................................................90
4. Project of Kingsgate Consolidate Ltd. - www.kingsgate.com.au ...............................................92
5. Project of Kinross - www.kinross.com.......................................................................................94
ANNEX 3: Description of the investment projects in iron mining .....................................................96
1. Project of Andes Iron - www.conocedominga.cl .....................................................................96
2. Project of CAP MINERA. - www.capmineria.cl .......................................................................97
3. Project of Hebei Wenfeng Industrial Group - www.wfsteel.com .............................................98
ANNEX 4: Description of the investment projects in industrial minerals .........................................99
1. Projects of Ingenieros Asesores Ltda.........................................................................................99
2. Projects of SQM S.A. - www.sqm.cl .........................................................................................100
3. Project of White Mountain Titanium Corp - www.wmtcorp.com ..........................................101
Figure Index
Figure 1: Distribution of the investment in Chilean mining, according to condition ........................ 17

Figure 2: Distribution of the investments in Chilean mining, according to project type .................. 20
Figure 3: Total investment of the investment portfolio per region, copper mining, and others ..... 21
Figure 4: Total investment of the investment portfolio according to originating country (MMUS$
and %)................................................................................................................................................ 24
Figure 5: Investment per year, realized and to be realized, of the project portfolio according to
type of mining ................................................................................................................................... 26
Figure 6: Projection of maximum copper production in SxEw cathodes, 2014-2026 period ........... 33
Figure 7: Projection of maximum copper production in concentrates, 2014-2026 period .............. 34
Figure 8: Production of copper in concentrates and the participation in total production ............. 35
Figure 9: Projection of maximum copper production in concentrates according to destination,
2014-2026 period .............................................................................................................................. 36
Figure 10: Projection of maximum production of tailings from the copper concentrating process,
2014 - 2026........................................................................................................................................ 37
Figure 11: Capacity for processing in copper concentrating plants up to 2026 ............................... 38
Figure 12: Relation between treated mineral and fine copper content in concentrate produced .. 39

Table Index
Table 1: Conditions to carry out a project......................................................................................... 10

Table 2: Register of mining projects in Chile 2015 2024 ................................................................ 16
Table 3: Distribution of the investments in Chilean mining per sector and condition of the
projects.............................................................................................................................................. 17
Table 4: Distribution of the investments in Chilean mining per sector and stage of advancement.18
Table 5: Distribution of the investment in Chilean mining according to area and processing before
the SEA .............................................................................................................................................. 19
Table 6: Distribution of the investment in Chilean mining per sector and project type .................. 20
Table 7: Investment in copper mining per region and project condition ......................................... 22
Table 8: Investment in gold, iron and industrial mineral mining, per region and project condition.23
Table 9: Distribution of the investment in cooper mining per originating country and condition
(MMUS$) ........................................................................................................................................... 25
Table 10: Investment in gold, iron, and industrial mineral mining, per originating country and
condition (MMUS$) ........................................................................................................................... 25
Table 11: Yearly distribution of the copper mining investment according to the project condition
(MMUS$) ........................................................................................................................................... 27
Table 12: Yearly distribution of the investment in gold, iron and industrial minerals according to
condition (MMUS$) ........................................................................................................................... 28
Table 13: Estimated production capacity of copper mining in Chile through 2026 (kt of fine Cu)... 30
Table 14: Estimated Chilean production capacity of fine copper in concentrate through 2026 (kt of
fine Cu) .............................................................................................................................................. 32
Table 15: Estimated Chilean production capacity of fine copper in SxEw cathodes through 2026
(Thousands of tons.).......................................................................................................................... 32
Table 16: Maximum regional productive capacity of copper mines in Chile through 2026
(thousands of tons of fine Cu) ........................................................................................................... 40
Table 17: Maximum regional productive capacity of fine copper concentrate through 2026
(thousands of tons) ........................................................................................................................... 41
Table 18: Maximum regional productive capacity of fine copper in SxEw cathodes through 2026
(thousands of tons) ........................................................................................................................... 42
Table 19: Contribution to maximum production capacity of gold and silver according to project .. 44
Table 20: Maximum production capacity of molybdenum according to project ............................. 45
Table 21: Estimate of new iron production capacities according to project .................................... 46
Table 22: Comparison of investment portfolios 2015 vs. 2014 ............Error! Marcador no definido.
Table 23: Comparison of portfolios 2015 and 2014 according to project condition ........................ 51
Table 24: Comparison of portfolios 2015 and 2014 according to type of mining ............................ 52
Table 25: Comparison of portfolios 2015 and 2014 according to type of mining and project
condition ........................................................................................................................................... 52
Table 26: Comparison of portfolios 2015 and 2014 at a regional level ............................................ 53

1. Introduction
The following report corresponds to a new update of the yearly report about investments in Chilean
mining for the next decade, which is part of a line of work carried out by the Chilean Copper
Commission and the Department of Studies and Public Policies for the past almost 10 years.
The information herein contained is on based on public records available through June 2015, having
the primary objective of providing pertinent information about the registry of mining projects which
are currently valid in Chile, with the following projection of the expected investment and the
potential capacity of mining production in Chile, considering the productive contribution which
results from the investment process during the next ten years.
The registration of the mining initiatives in this report does not assure they will materialize within
the terms and timeframes planned by the companies, however it shows the interest they have to
advance in their current mining activities, in the case of the companies with operations in Chile, or
to begin mining in our territory, having considered the geologic potential of the available mining
property as well as the economic and political perspectives in the country in the long term.
This report is structured in the following manner:
a) Specification of the methodological criteria used for the elaboration of this report, showing
coverage, attributes which coincide with the condition that each project is in, with the
purpose of measuring the level of certainty of the available information, information
sources, criteria to estimate the start-up date if it is not readily available, and the estimate
of the copper production capacity and of that of other minerals in the long term.
b) Analysis of the investment required for the copper mining project portfolio, as well as that
of gold, silver mining, iron mining, and that of some industrial minerals, with respects to the
conditionality of these initiatives, the purpose of the investment, the regional distribution
and the countries wherein the investments originate. The descriptive background of each
of the projects considered is included in Annex 1 (copper mining), Annex 2 (gold and silver
mining) and Annex 3 (industrial minerals: iodine, nitrates, potassium salts, and titanium
oxide,) respectively.
c) An estimate of the investment flow coming from the project profile, indicating the amounts
already invested, the yearly flow during the next decade, and the amount to be invested
after the next five years. It is to be noted that this projection is only referential and does not
constitute a commitment with the companies which own the projects.
d) Furthermore, and as a result of the investment process, the productive contribution of these
projects is shown, through projections of the maximum production capacity of the copper
mine, in concentrates such as SxEw cathodes, looking toward 2026 (two years after the last
start-up registered in this report) and focusing on the conditionality of the initiatives.
Additionally, a global estimate is given for the future production of gold, silver,
molybdenum, iron and the industrial minerals considered. As in the case of the

annualization of the investments, the production estimates are only referential based on
the methodologies and information sources described at the beginning of this document.
e) As in the previous two years, a registry is made as a form of comparison of the changes
which have been registered between the current project portfolio and the previous,
showing variations in investment amounts as well as in the quantity of initiatives
considered. In this opportunity a vision is given on a level of the conditionality of the
projects, investment purpose, and comparison on a regional level of the changes produced.
Finally it concludes with the most relevant background information which can be taken from the
information given.

2. Methodology
The Methodology which is used for the confection of this register is based on the following criteria:
2.1. Coverage
The project register covers the investments with productive purposes (reposition or expansion of
the production or new development) anticipated by CODELCO and the private companies of the
large and medium metal and non-metal mines, excluding energy minerals. Only projects with
investments which surpass 90 million dollars are included, as are those which are already being
carried out as well as those in which the companies are assessing and have the intention of initiating
the investment process within a five year period.
For the effects of the yearly distribution of the estimated investment for each project, included is
the sum of the investments already in place from the beginning of the project until the end of the
year prior to the present report under the concept of Before xxxx wherein xxxx corresponds to
the publication year of the report. Then the estimated investment is assigned for each year of the
next five year period. Similarly, for those projects which will begin operations after the next five
year period, it is presented as Investment after xxxx, wherein xxxx is the year after the last year
of the present five year period, for the accumulated investment which will be carried out until the
operations begin.
It is worth noting that the information compiled in this document is the best approximation known
of the projects being considered. In some cases, without other public information, the yearly
distribution of the investments are estimates of the authors and are not binding in any way for the
companies who own the projects.
The background information of each project includes an estimate of the production of metals which
they would supply, when it corresponds to such, as well as the indication of the current state of the
project.
2.2. Attributes of the projects and the conditions of carrying them out
The information about the investment projects is characterized by the uncertainty due to the
quantity and quality of the background information available, which depends on the attributes of
the projects up to the date in which the registry is made.
2.2.1. Conditions for the materialization
Each attribute has a degree to which it may be associated to a greater or lesser degree of certainty
and the combination of which will give a perception of the conditionality in which it is found to be
carried out. Therefore, there are 4 conditions defined: Basic, probable, possible, and potential, as
associated with the specific attributes which are detailed in Table 1:

Table 1: Conditions for carrying out a project
Condition Project type Stage of advance SEA process Implementation
BASE Any Execution RCA approved Within the period
RCA approved or in
Any Execution suspended Within the period
judicial claims
PROBABLE Any Feasibility RCA approved Within the period
Reposition or expansion Feasibility EIA or DIA in process Within the period
Reposition or expansion Feasibility suspended EIA or DIA in process Within the period
Reposition or expansion Feasibility EIA or DIA not presented Within the period
POSSIBLE EIA or DIA in process or

New Feasibility Within the period
not presented
Any Feasibility RCA approved Outside of the period
EIA or DIA in process or

Reposition or expansion Feasibility Outside of the period
not presented
Any Feasibility suspended Any Outside of the period
EIA or DIA in process or

POTENTIAL New Feasibility Outside of the period
not presented
Any Pre-Feasibility Any Any
Source: Prepared by COCHILCO
The attributes of a project are associated to their type, the stage of advance they are in, the status
of the processing before the SEA, and the estimated date of implementation. The explanation of
each is as follows:
2.2.2. Project type
This attribute gives information about the degrees of certainty of the realization of an investment
project, as it relates to the strategic purpose of the Company and the lesser to higher complexities
they face for the implementation to be carried out. The categories are as follows:
a) Replacement projects: Those wherein the investment is to maintain the productive capacity
of a current operation (brownfield) with new mining developments, to deal with a decline
in ore grades and/or depletion of sectors being mined. This allows the Company to prolong
the lifespan of the site and the use of the installations.
b) Expansion projects: Those which seek to enlarge the current operational capacity
(brownfield), with the purpose of increasing the production scale and diminishing the
unitary costs, especially due to a decline in ore grades of the mining resources to be
exploited.
c) New projects: Those located at a new deposit (greenfield), and have to begin everything:
the environmental and sector permissions, develop infrastructure, and settle into a new

location. It also includes projects in current operations (brownfield), which contemplate a

complete change in the productive process (For example: from leaching to concentration),
which implies a practically new development of the site.
2.2.3. Stage of advance
It is possible to estimate that to the degree that a project advances the certainty that it will be
carried out increases. Therefore the projects have been categorized, according to the stage they
are in:
a) In Execution: The investment has been approved as well as has the corresponding
permissions for it to be carried out. It is already in one of the detailed engineering or
construction stages from the beginning to the implementation.
b) Feasibility Assessment: Those which have already begun the feasibility studies and those of
environmental evaluation (EIA or DIA) or they may already have been finished, but the final
decision approving the investment has not been made.
c) In Pre-feasibility Assessment: Those which are in the initial stage of pre-feasibility studies
until the decision is made to continue to the following stage.
Most of the projects follow a normal course, notwithstanding the modifications which are seen fit
to introduce, however, the advancement of a project may be affected by some type of suspension,
be it from internal situations or those outside of the companys control. Upon suspension, the
project stops advancing and in some cases will return to the previous stage to redo the studies and
thereby resolver the complications which have arisen be they internal or external.
2.2.4. Processing before the Environmental Evaluation Service (SEA)
No project may be carried out without having the Environmental Qualification Resolution (RCA)
approved, which occurs after an exhaustive technical-administrative process which includes civic
participation, which is submitted to the declaration or the studies of the corresponding
environmental evaluation.
Therefore, three stages are shown, from most to least certainty:
a) RCA approved,
b) EIA or DIA in process
c) EIA or DIA nor presented
2.2.5. Implementation time frame
The level of certainty of the background information also depends on the proximity or length of time
from the date set for the implementation. The following ranges indicate a greater to lesser
certainty:
a) Within the period: Date within the period of analysis, or within the five-year period,
b) Outside of the period or Long-term: Date after the period of analysis, or outside of the five-
year period.

2.3. The investments of Codelco and their information sources

The information sources about the investments projected by Codelco are based on public
information given by the corporation on their webpage, in presentations from the board of
directors, and are compiled primarily on the whole of information available from their Business and
Development Plan, and other official information of the Company received regularly by the Direction
of Evaluation of Investments and Strategic Management (DEIGE) of Cochilco, which assist in
supplying a better estimate. This information is to be understood as being only a prospective tool
and does not bind the public entities which would intervene in the evaluation of the investment
projects, which may or may not be considered in the projection2.
The investments considered by Codelco, are those which are contemplated in the 2015 Business
and Development Plan (PND 2015), justified as development projects or to increase the information
necessary for future developments.
The development projects are directly related with the productive future of the divisions and should
meet profitability norms to be approved. Of these are highlighted:
a) Structural projects: a select group of the development projects conceived to take an integral
advantage of the mineral resources, and constitute the base for the development of the
corporation in the long term. The report of each of these projects gives explicit background
information of the characteristics and investment amounts for the implementation stage.
b) Other developmental projects: the investment portfolio of Codelco contains diverse
projects with more temporary or short term goals, whose execution are essential for the
continuity of operations in the productive divisions, considering them to complement that
which has been planned for the structural projects. In this report the global background of
the investment amounts is considered for this concept.
Furthermore, Codelco justifies as informational projects those which allow them to acquire new and
relevant information for corporative development, but which are not broken down under a
particular investment project. Within this concept, the investments are grouped in studies for future
developmental projects (pre-feasibility, feasibility, environmental evaluation, etc.), the investment
in basic and generative exploration, and investments in I&D. Given the diversity of these purposes,
only a broad background of the financing requirements considered for this concept is given.
2
Before an investment can be confirmed, it is required that an Authorization of Investment Projects be carried out, during the
evaluation of which the Chilean Copper Commission and the Social Development Department work together. It does not include those
expenses which CODELCO treats as investments (Differed expenses and others) for which the aforementioned authorization is not
required. The fact that they are identified in the 2014 PND does not necessarily mean that they have the established investment
authorization which is required by the applicable regulations and does not bind the entities mentioned therein.

Among the projects included in this report the investments from the 2014 PND are not considered
which are justified with other objectives, such as the replacement of equipment, refurbishing of
installations, decontamination projects, workplace safety and well-being, even though they also
require an API to be carried out. This exclusion meets the purpose of making Codelcos information
comparable with the information for private investments, as this type of information from the
privately owned companies is not available.
Also excluded are those corporate investment which, for their nature, do not require an API and
which escape being covered in the present report. However it has been found pertinent to consider
the investments of Codelco in companies intending to build metallurgic plants for by-product
processing, and thereby obtain final products of a higher value3. This type of investment is excluded
in Codelcos investment total, and as such are consigned as Metallurgic Plants in copper mining.
2.4. Investment in private mining and information sources

The information about private mining projects is gathered principally from the announcements
made by the companies through the media (company web pages, newspapers, articles in specialized
magazines, etc.) and through their presentations to the environmental evaluation department.
It includes all of the projects which have begun construction. In the case of the projects which are
still in the Assessment phase the advancement has been reviewed and investment predictions have
been updated, as well as implementation date and estimated production profiles, with the most
recent public information.
This implies that at least the following updates are made:
a) Identification of the project titleholder for projects which have changed hands.
b) Production capacity and types of products of interest.
c) Investment amounts, implementation date, and execution order of events.
d) Inclusion of new projects.
e) Elimination of projects which were recently implemented.
f) New requirements, such as the incorporation of the usage of sea water, be it directly or
desalinized.
With respects to the investment amounts, it is assumed that the projects reflect principally the
execution stage, notwithstanding that several of them may include prior investments in the
Assessment phase.
3
MOLYB Ltda. is an affiliate to produce molybdenum trioxide from molybdenite. Similarly, PLANTA RECUPERADORA DE
METALES, (60% LS NIKKO of Korea and 40% of Codelco), is a company which processes anodic slime to recuperate gold,
silver, and other noble minerals.

Due to the fact that generally only a general investment amount is known a year prior to the
implementation date, the yearly distribution of the investment is estimated by assuming tentative
timelines for project development, based primarily in the information given in the presentations to
the environmental evaluation system or by empirical estimates of how similar projects are
developed chronologically.
It is worth noting that in the cases of projects which are lacking precise public data for the
implementation year, Cochilco has estimated it based on the context of the available data, which
does not bind the companies in any way.
2.5. Methodological criteria for estimating the implementation date

Diverse circumstances either internal and/or external may affect the development of the projects.
External factors refer to the necessary of: securing the electrical supply at a lower amount than the
prevailing costs, fine tuning of the environmental impact Assessment and/or obtaining permits to
build infrastructure as required for the project.
Furthermore, internal factors refer to the synchronization of the project with the global strategy of
the company, acquiring financing, and the need of improving the cost indicators considered for
investment and/or operation as determined in the project engineering studies, as well as others.
In the instance of a lack of public data about the implementation date of a given project, COCHILCO
applies the following methodological criteria:
a) A year of delay is considered if the project is only affected by external factors,
notwithstanding that the company carries out studies to improve the Feasibility Assessment
considering the resolution of the pending topics, which could mean minor modifications in
the Assessment.
b) Two years of delay are considered if the project requires reworking to take into account the
pre-feasibility or Feasibility studies, a normal time frame for this type of studies to be carried
out.
In the case that there is not sufficient background information to estimate a clear implementation
date for the initiatives, these are removed from the portfolio as restructuring projects.
2.6. Estimating the production capacity of copper mines

The maximum potential copper production capacity corresponds to the sum of the estimated
individual maximum production capacity of each profile for the current mining operations which
produce copper concentrates and/or SxEw cathodes, as those which correspond to the new copper
projects contemplated in the present investment portfolio which will be implemented within the
next decade. The figures are expressed in tons of fine copper.
The future profiles of the current operations are projected over the base of the recent productive
behavior and the estimate of the evolution of the mining-metallurgic parameters (ore grade and

recovery capacity of the concentrating plants or the consumption of rates in acids in

hydrometallurgical operations, considering maximum treatment profiles and they do not
contemplate usage problems of the processing plant, all of which are according to the information
which is available to Cochilco, considering a continuous operation of 360 days per year.
At the same time, the projected project profiles for the projects are based in the maximum
treatment capacity of the minerals described by the companies for a continuous operation of 360
days per year, and the background of the mining-metallurgical parameters which are expected for
future operations.
As the projects are assigned distinct materialization conditions (base, probable, possible, and
potential), the production profiles are broken down according to these degrees, indicating therein
the levels of certainty from most to least. For this reason the projected amounts should be
understood as an estimated potential maximum capacity, beginning in the year of the publication
of the present report, according to the available background information. Included as referential
data is the real production registered the year after the publication of this update.
It is worth noting that the production projection horizon is up to two years after the last year of the
implementation which is registered in this report.

3. Investment in Chilean mining

The present chapter shows information with regards to the investment amounts required for the
projects being considered, based on criteria such as investment purpose, conditionality, regional
investment, and by country of origin. The list of the projects considered in this update of the
investment portfolio in Chilean mining, through July 2015, is shown in the following table.
Table 2: Register of Chilean mining projects 2015 2024
Investment
Status of
Project Development through
Implementation Projects Operator Mining Sector Region Condition environmental
type stage July 2015
permissions
(MMUS$)
2015 - 2019 Other development projects Codelco Chile State - Cu Various Replacement BASE Execution N/A 2,758
2015 - 2019 Information projects Codelco Chile State - Cu Various New POSSIBLE Feasibility N/A 1,165
2015 informacin
Romeral Phase V Ca. Minera del Pacfico Iron Coquimbo Replacement BASE Execution EIA approved 198
2015 Escondida OGP I Minera Escondida Ltda. Large mining - Cu Antofagasta Expansion BASE Execution EIA approved 4,199
2015 Antucoya Minera Antucoya Large mining - Cu Antofagasta New BASE Execution EIA approved 1,900
2015 Update Esperanza Minera Centinela Large mining- Cu Antofagasta Expansion BASE Execution EIA approved 630
2015 Valle Central Expansion Minera Valle Central Med. Mine - Cu O'Higgins Expansion BASE Execution EIA approved 152
2016 Mo treatment plant Molyb Ltda. Metallurgy Plants Antofagasta New BASE Execution EIA approved 425
2016 Oso Negro Minera San Fierro Chile Ltda Iron Atacama New PROBABLE Feasibility EIA approved 90
2016 Metal recovery plant Planta Rec. de Metales SpA Metallurgy Plants Antofagasta New BASE Execution EIA approved 96
2016 Encuentro xidos Minera Centinela Large mining - Cu Antofagasta Replacement BASE Execution EIA approved 636
2016 El Tesoro modifications Minera Centinela Large mining - Cu Antofagasta Replacement BASE Execution EIA approved 86
2016 Quebrada Blanca Update Ca. Minera Teck Quebrada Large mining- Cu Tarapac Replacement PROBABLE Feasibility EIA presented 165
2017 Blanca
Sierra Gorda SCM Large mining Cu Antofagasta Expansion PROBABLE Feasibility EIA presented
Sierra Gorda Expansion 220 ktpd 1,500
2017 Pampa Blanca Expansion SQM Nitrato Industrial Minerals Antofagasta Expansion PROBABLE Feasibility EIA approved 665
2017 Nueva Esperanza Arqueros Laguna Resources Chile Gold Atacama New POSSIBLE Feasibility Without EIA 150
2017 Pascua Ca. Minera Nevada Gold Atacama New PROBABLE Execution EIA suspended 4,250
2017 Arbiodo Ingenieros Asesores Ltda. Industrial Minerals Antofagasta New POSSIBLE Feasibility Without EIA 503
2017 Cerro Blanco SCM White Mountain Titanium Industrial Minerals Atacama New PROBABLE Feasibility EIA approved 380
2017 Caspiche xidos Eton Chile Gold Atacama New POSSIBLE Feasibility Without EIA 344
2017 El Espino Pucobre Medium mining - Cu Coquimbo New POSSIBLE Feasibility EIA presented 624
2017 Cerro Colorado Cont. Pampa Norte Large mining- Cu Tarapac Replacement PROBABLE Feasibility EIA presented 467
2017 Operacional
Los Bronces - phase 7 AngloAmerican Sur S.A. Large mining- Cu Metropolitana Expansion PROBABLE Feasibility EIA presented 112
2018 La Coipa phase 7 Kinross Minera de Chile Ltda. Gold Atacama Replacement PROBABLE Feasibility EIA presented 200
2018 Santo Domingo Santo Domingo SCM Large mining - Cu Atacama New PROBABLE Feasibility EIA approved 1,700
2018 Candelaria 2030 Ca. Contractual Minera Large mining - Cu Atacama Replacement PROBABLE Feasibility EIA approved 460
2018 Cerro Maricunga Candelaria
Minera Atacama Pacific Gold Gold Atacama New POSSIBLE Feasibility Without EIA 587
2018 Diego de Almagro Chile Ltda. Minera Sierra Norte
Compaa Medium mining - Cu Atacama New PROBABLE Feasibility EIA approved 597
2018 Productora S.A
Sociedad Minera El guila Medium mining - Cu Atacama New POTENTIAL Pre-feasibility Without EIA 700
2018 Ampliacin Marginal los Limitada
Minera Los Pelambres Large mining - Cu Coquimbo Replacement POSSIBLE Feasibility Without EIA 1,190
2019 Pelambres
Sulfuros RT phase II Codelco Div. Radomiro Tomic State - Cu Antofagasta New POSSIBLE Feasibility EIA presented 5,459
2019 Spence Growth Option Pampa Norte Large mining - Cu Antofagasta New POSSIBLE Feasibility EIA presented 3,300
2019 Dominga Andes Iron Iron Coquimbo New POSSIBLE Feasibility EIA presented 2,888
2019 Distrito Centinela(*) Minera Centinela Large mining - Cu Antofagasta New POSSIBLE Feasibility EIA presented 4,350
2020 Development
Chuquicamata Subterranean Codelco Div. Chuquicamata State - Cu Antofagasta Replacement BASE Execution EIA approved 3,816
2020 Rajo Inca Codelco Div. Salvador State - Cu Atacama Expansion POTENTIAL Pre-Feasibility Without EIA 2.691
2020 Quebrada Blanca Hipgeno Ca. Minera Teck Quebrada Large mining - Cu Tarapac New POTENTIAL Feasibility Without EIA 5,590
2021 Blanca
Codelco Div. El Teniente State - Cu O'Higgins Replacement BASE Execution EIA approved
New Level Mine 4,920
2021 El Abra Mill Project SCM El Abra Large mining - Cu Antofagasta New POTENTIAL Feasibility Without EIA 5,000
2022 Mine- Plant Transfer Codelco Div. Andina State - Cu Valparaso Replacement BASE Execution N/A 1,323
2022 Relincho Ca. Minera Relincho Copper Large mining - Cu Atacama New POTENTIAL Feasibility Without EIA 4,500
2024 S.A.
Codelco Div. Andina State - Cu Valparaso Expansion POSSIBLE Feasibility EIA presented
Nueva Andina Phase II 6,524
Total Investment in the project portfolio 2015 - 2024 (MMUS$) 77,290
(*): Previously named Encuentro Sulfuros
Source: Prepared by COCHILCO, based on information for each project taken from public sources

3.1. Project conditionality

Every mining initiative may be affected by certain variables which cause changes in the planned
timeline, these are usually the stage of advancement in the construction or studies, obtaining
permission, be it environmental or sectoral, financial strength of the Operating companies, among
others. Based on this information it is possible to establish the conditions: base, probable, possible,
and potential, based on the greater or less amount of certainty of which the project will come about
in the time and with the aforementioned variables4. Figure 1 shows the investment distribution
according to the condition, while table 3 shows how the investment is distributed per mining sector
and project condition.
Figure 1: Investment distribution in Chilean mining, according to condition
POTENTIAL BASE
MMUS$ 18.481 MMUS$ 21.139
23,9% 27,4%
5 projects 13 projects
POSSIBLE PROBABLE
MMUS$ 27.464 MMUS$ 10.206
35,5% 13,2%
13 projects 11 projects
Table 3: Investment distribution in Chilean mining per sector and project condition
Sector Total Base Probable Possible Potential

Mining sector Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment
Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$)
Codelco 8 28,656 4 12,817 0 0 3 13,148 1 2,691
Large mining 17 35,785 5 7,451 6 4,404 3 8,840 3 1,090
Medium mining 4 2,073 1 152 1 597 1 624 1 700
Metallurgic Plants 2 521 2 521 0 0 0 0 0 0
Copper subtotal 31 67,035 12 20,941 7 5,001 7 22,612 5 1,481
Gold and Silver 5 5,531 0 0 2 4,450 3 1,081 0 0
Iron 3 3,176 1 198 1 90 1 2,888 0 0
Industrial minerals 3 1,548 0 0 1 665 2 883 0 0
Other mineral subtotal 11 10,255 1 198 4 5,205 6 4,852 0 0
4
For more information on the Methodology, go to Chapter 2.2 Project attributes and conditions for their realization.

Therefore the investment portfolio for 2015-2024 corresponds to 42 initiatives, broken down into
31 copper mining projects, valued in US$ 67,035 million, and 11 projects belonging to gold, silver,
iron, and industrial mineral mining, for a total of US$ 10,255 million.
Of this total, we will initially analyze the projects with the greatest probability of being carried out
within the time frame indicated by the proprietary mining companies, which correspond to those
projects in the base and probable conditions, being 23 initiatives valued in US$ 29,845 million:
- 13 initiatives are in base condition, with an investment of US$ 21,139 million, wherein
CODELCO has a 63.1% participation rate of the investments in this condition.
- 10 projects in a probable condition, with an investment of US$ 10,206 million, where gold
and silver mining make up 43.6% of the total investment.
The second group, projects in the possible and potential category, correspond to those initiatives
with a lesser probability of materializing within the time frame established by the owners as well as
being those more likely to be affected by changes in market conditions, being the equivalent of 18
initiatives valued in US$ 45,945 million:
- 13 in the possible condition, valued in US$27,464 million, wherein CODELCO has a 48%
participation in the investment total.
- Five initiatives in the potential condition, with an investment total of US$ 18,481 million,
wherein the large private copper mining has 82% participation.
Due to the complex characteristics and ease of being affected by the variables described at the
beginning of this chapter, this last group requires more attention so that in the right time they may
be implemented within the institutional framework of the country.
To better analyze the variables involved up to the moment of defining the condition of the projects
in this registry, following is shown the investment distribution of the projects with regards to their
stage of advancement and of processing before the Environmental Evaluation Service.
Table 4: Investment distribution in Chilean mining per sector and stage of advancement
Sector Total Execution Execution suspended Feasibility Pre-feasibility

Mining sector Project
Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment Investment Project Investment
Quantit
Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$)
y
Codelco 8 28,656 4 12,817 0 0 3 13,148 1 2,691
Large mining 17 34,285 5 7,451 0 0 12 28,334 0 0
Medium mining 4 2,073 1 152 0 0 2 1,221 1 700
Metallurgic plants 2 521 2 521 0 0 0 0 0 0
metalrgicas
Copper Subtotal 31 67,035 12 20,941 0 0 17 42,703 2 3,391
Gold and silver 5 5,531 0 0 1 4,250 4 1,281 0 0
Iron 3 3,176 1 198 0 0 2 2,978 0 0
Industrial minerals 3 1,548 0 0 0 0 3 1,548 0 0
Other mineral Subtotal 11 10,255 1 198 1 4,250 9 5,807 0 0

As observed in Table 4, the projects in execution make up 27.4% of the total portfolio with 13
initiatives, of which Mine-Plant Transfer of Divisin Andina and Other development projects of
CODELCO which do not possess the Environmental Impact studies due to investments on an
operational level. It may also be observed that the investment portfolio concentrates 62.8% of the
inversions on 26 projects in the feasibility stage.
Table 5: Investment distribution in Chilean mining per sector and SEA process
Sector Total EIA approved EIA suspended EIA presented Without EIA N/A
Mining Sector Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment
Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$)
Codelco 8 28,656 2 8,736 0 0 2 11,983 1 2,691 3 5,246
Large mining 17 35,785 7 9,611 0 0 6 9,894 4 16,280 0 0
Medium mining 4 2,073 2 749 0 0 1 624 1 700 0 0
Metallurgic Plants 2 521.1 2 521 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Copper Subtotal 30 67,035 13 19,616 0 0 9 22,501 6 19,671 3 5,246
Gold and silver 5 5,531 0 0 1 4,250 1 200 3 1,081 0 0
Iron 3 3,176 2 288 0 0 1 2,888 0 0 0 0
Industrial minerals 3 1,548 2 1,045 0 0 0 0 1 503 0 0
Other minerals subtotal 11 10,255 4 1,333 1 4,250 2 3,088 4 1,584 0 0
Similarly, table 5 shows the 17 initiatives which equal 27.1% of the total inversion which have the
RCA approved as of July 2015, which indicates that there are 6 initiatives which, in the next few
months, could begin implementation and change their materialization condition. Furthermore,
33.1% of the financing corresponds to 10 initiatives which have not yet received a positive
environmental qualification (RCA approved) for their presented projects, and 27.5% of the
investment corresponds to projects which have not yet entered their respective EIA into the system.

3.2. Investment purpose

The materialization of the initiatives, as well as being subject to the aforementioned variables,
depends on the strategic purpose of the Company with regards to its future development. Following
is an investment summary of the inversions for the project portfolio for the 2015-2024 period,
according to the mining sector it is destined to, distributed by project type5.
Figure 2: Investment distribution in Chilean mining, according to project type
REPLACEMENT
MMUS$ 16.219
21,0%
12 projects
NEW
MMUS$ 44.598
57,7%
22 projects
EXPANSION
MMUS$ 16.473
21,3%
8 projects
Table 6: Investment distribution in Chilean mining per sector and project type
Sector Total Replacement Expansion New
Mining sector Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment Project
Investment (MMUS$)
Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity
CODELCO 8 28,656 4 12,817 2 9,215 2 6,624
Large mining 17 35,785 6 3,004 4 6,441 7 26,340
Medium mining 4 2,073 0 0 1 152 3 1,921
Metallurgic plants 2 521 0 0 0 0 2 521
Copper subtotal 31 67,035 10 15,821 7 15,808 14 35,406
Gold and silver 5 5,531 1 200 0 0 4 5,331
Iron 3 3,176 1 198 0 0 2 2,978
Industrial minerals 3 1,548 0 0 1 665 2 883
Other minerals subtotal 11 10,255 2 398 1 665 8 9,192
Upon closer observation of the investment details, it can be determined that the replacement of
the productive capacity corresponds to 21% of the total investment with 12 initiatives, wherein
projects y CODELCO make up 79% of this segment. Furthermore, the expansion of operations which
5
See subchapter 2.2.2, Project type

are currently in production reaches 21.3% of the total inversion in the portfolio with only eight
projects, wherein CODELCO again is relevant with 55.9% of this segment. In summary, the
brownfield investments of the project portfolio, replacement and expansion of current operations
reaches 42.3% of the investment portfolio with CODELCO as the principal investor.
Similarly, 22 of the 42 projects considered in the investment portfolio for 2015-2024, making up
57.7% of the portfolios value, correspond to new projects presented by mining companies
operating in the country as well as by 10 companies who would like to enter the Chilean mining
market with the new projects. The principal intention of the new companies and their projects are_
one for large copper mining, one for medium copper mining, three in gold mining, two in iron, two
in industrial minerals, and one metallurgical plant. These 10 initiatives make up US$ 7,438 million,
or 9.6% of the total portfolio value.
3.3. Regional Investment
The third look at the mining project portfolio is that of the regional distribution of the investment,
in copper mining as well as gold, silver, iron compounds, and industrial minerals, as shown in figure
3.
Figure 3: Total investment of the investment portfolio by regions for copper mining and others
Tarapac 6.222
Antofagasta 32.966
Atacama 11.138
Coquimbo 1.814
Valparaso 8.141
Metropolitana 504
O'Higgins 6.249
0 5.000 10.000 15.000 20.000 25.000 30.000 35.000
Inversiones en minera del cobre (MMUS$) Inversiones en minera de oro y plata (MMUS$)
Inversiones en minera del hierro y min. ind. (MMUS$)
Source: Prepared by Cochilco
As previously explained, the investment distribution by the conditionality of the projects allows to
create a realistic image of the investment portfolio, for this reason table 7 also shows the regional
distribution of the investment in copper mining according to the condition of materialization of the
projects.

Table 7: Copper mining investment per region and project condition
Region Total Base Probable Possible Potential

Region
Project Investment % of total Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment
Quantity (MMUS$) investment Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$)
Tarapac 3 6,222 8.1% 0 0 2 632 0 0 1 5,590
Antofagasta 13 32,966 42.7% 8 12,891 1 1,500 3 13,575 1 5,000
Atacama 6 11,138 14.4% 0 345 3 2,757 0 146 3 7,891
Coquimbo 2 1,814 2.3% 0 0 0 0 2 1,814 0 0
Valparaso 2 8,141 10.5% 1 1,530 0 0 1 6,611 0 0
Metropolitana 1 504 0.7% 0 276 1 112 0 117 0 0
OHiggins 2 6,249 8.1% 2 5,899 0 0 0 350 0 0
TOTAL 31 67,035 86.7% 12 20,941 7 5,001 7 22,612 5 18,481
Copper mining, with 31 projects, makes up 86.7% of the total investments in the portfolio. Most of
these are found in Antofagasta, which, with 13 projects receives 42.7% of the total investment, of
which 8 are in base condition and only one in potential.
In second place is the Atacama region, with 6 initiatives which make up 14.4% of the total registry.
This region is the one which was most affected with respect to the previous version of the
investment register, due to the fact that a large percentage of the projects are in a potential
condition. In the investment portfolio for 2015, Atacama has 3 initiatives in the potential condition
which make up 70.8% of the total investment in copper projects in the region.
In third place we find the Valparaiso region, which receives 10.5% of the total investment in the
project portfolio, specifically the CODELCO projects Nueva Andina Phase II and Mine-Plant
Transfer, both from the Andina Division.
Sharing fourth places are the regions of Tarapac and OHiggins, each with 8.1% of the investment
portfolio, with initiatives coming from companies such as Teck and BHP Billiton in Tarapac and with
the projects from El Teniente Division of CODELCO and of Valle Central of Amerigo Resources in the
case of the OHiggins region.
Table 8 shows the regional distribution of the global investment in gold, iron, and industrial ore
mining.

Table 8: Investment in gold, iron and industrial ore mining, per region and project condition
Region Total Base Probable Possible Potential

Region
Project Investment % of total Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment Project Investment
Quantity (MMUS$) investment Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$) Quantity (MMUS$)
Antofagasta 2 1,168 1.5% - - 1 665 1 503 - -
Atacama 7 6,001 7.8% - - 3 4,540 4 1,461 - -
Coquimbo 2 3,086 4.0% 1 198 - - 1 2,888 - -
TOTAL 11 10,255 13.3% 1 198 4 5,205 6 4,852 - -
Investing in gold, iron, and industrial ore mining makes up 13.3% of the investment portfolio for
2015-2024 with 11 initiatives, concentrated mainly in 7 projects to be carried out in the Atacama
region (7.9% of the portfolio), aimed principally at gold mining (92.2% of the total regional
investment).
In Coquimbo two iron projects are being planned, one of which is on a large scale and plans to
coproduce copper, which is the case of the Dominga project by Andes Iron, while in Antofagasta
there are two initiatives to produce industrial minerals, one of which corresponds to a iodine and
nitrate project, carried out by Chilean investors in the region, named Arbiodo.
3.4. Investment by country of origin
An interesting perspective of the investments to be carried out within the next decade is to consider
the nationality of the owners of the operating companies of the projects, as well as those which only
invest in the new initiatives by participating as a primary partner. Figure 4 shows the total
investment in the portfolio, according to country of origin.

Figure 4: Total investment in the investment portfolio by country of origin (MMUS$ y %)
MMUS$ 573 MMUS$ 45.489

MMUS$ 825
0,7% 58,9%
1,1%
Chile
MMUS$ 1.316
1,7% Canad
Canada
MMUS$ 2.829
3,7% Australia
EE.UU.
United States
MMUS$ 2.930
3,8% Japan
Japn
MMUS$ 7.032 Reino Unido

United Kingdom
9,1%
Poland
Polonia
Corea
Korea
MMUS$ 16.206
21,0%
Investments come from 8 countries, led by Chile with 60% of total participation, coming from
companies such as Codelco and Antofagasta Minerals in state and private copper mining, Pucobre
and Copec in medium mining, as well as distinct international investments in gold, iron, and
industrial ore mining. In second place we find Canada, with a 21.4% participation, from emblematic
companies such as Teck Resources, Lundin Mining (who just acquired Candelaria), Kinross, Capstone
and the Santo Domingo project, Barrick Gold and other companies focused on investing in medium
copper mining and that of industrial minerals.
For a more detailed account, in Table 9 the distribution of investments in copper mine is shown for
each country and the total participation in the investment in mining is considered in the registry, all
contrasted with the conditionality of the investments.

Table 9: Distribution of the investment in copper mining per country of origin and condition (MMUS$)
% of the
Country of
Country total total Base Probable Possible Potential
origin
investment
Chile 41,500 53.69% 15,551 658 18,836 6,455
Canada 10,612 13.73% 152 1,684 0 8,776
Australia 6,882 8.90% 2,414 467 3,300 700
USA 2,550 3.30% 0 0 0 2,550
Japan 2,777 3.59% 1,500 800 476 0
United Kingdom 1,316 1.70% 1,260 56 0 0
Poland 825 1.07% 0 825 0 0
Korea 573 0.74% 63 510 0 0
TOTAL 65,535 86.5% 20,941 5,001 22,612 18,481
The prior Assessment is replicated for the different mineral projects other than copper in table 10.
Table 10: Investment in gold, iron, and industrial ore mining, by country of origin and condition (MMUS$)
% of the
Country of
Country total total Base Probable Possible Potential
origin
investment
Chile 3,989 5.16% 160 438 3,391 0
Canada 5,593 7.24% 0 4,663 931 0
USA 380 0.49% 0 380 0 0
Australia 150 0.19% 0 0 150 0
China 90 0.12% 0 90 0 0
Japan 52 0.07% 38 14 0 0
TOTAL 10,255 13.3% 198 5,585 4,472 0

4. Estimation of the yearly investment distribution in the project portfolio

The estimation of the investment flow in the 2015-2024 project portfolio allows for the observation
of the short and medium term progress in the mining investment, in the amount that emerged
before 2015, US$ 15,415 million, which corresponds to 19.9% of the current portfolio, the
investment to be obtained during the next five-year period from 2015-2019 of US$44,894 million,
equaling 58.1% of the portfolio, and the estimate of the remaining amount to be invested in the
2020-2024 period in those projects whose implementation date is set for this time frame, whose
investment amount reaches US$16,981 million, equaling 22% of the investment portfolio.
Figure 5 graphs the yearly investment distribution in copper mining, and of the other minerals in the
2015 to 2024 period, separated by those already obtained, the yearly amounts for the 2015-2019
period, and finally the remnant to be invested after 2019.
Figure 5: Yearly investments, already obtained and to be obtained, for the investment portfolio according
to type of mining
18.000
16.000 Coppe
Cobre Otros minerales
r
14.000
12.000
MMUS$
10.000
8.000
6.000
4.000
2.000
0
Anterior a 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020- 2024
2015
However, it is necessary to look at the conditionality of the investment flow, for which, and on the
basis of available public information, a yearly investment profile has been estimated according to
the anticipated timeline, and has been assigned a condition which reflects the degree of certainty
of the implementation for each project.
4.1. Investment distribution in copper mining

Table 11 summarizes the yearly investment flow in coper mining for the following segments:
CODELCO; large private mining, medium mining, and metallurgical plants, distribution of the

investment from degrees of greater to lesser certainty of implementation within the period
indicated by the companies which own the projects, meaning, from the base condition to potential.
Table 11: Yearly investment distribution in copper mining according to project condition (MMUS$)
Copper mining according Before Subtotal % of

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 - 2024 TOTAL
to condition 2015 2015 -2019 investment
TOTAL 10,800 5,380 7,695 8,515 9,377 8,288 39,254 16,981 67,035 100%
Of which:
Base 8,576 3,154 2,136 2,211 1,840 2,027 11,368 997 20,941 31%
Probable 775 663 1,004 829 266 0 2,762 0 3,501 7%
Possible 854 1,003 2,417 3,157 4,027 3,118 13,721 8,037 22,612 34%
Potential 595 311 1,138 2,103 3,244 3,143 9,939 7,947 18,481 28%
CODELCO 2,308 2,099 3,202 3,766 3,601 4,138 16,805 9,542 28,656 100%
of which:
Base 2,168 1,540 2,069 2,175 1,840 2,027 9,651 997 12,817 45%
Probable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0%
Possible 130 526 1,085 1,398 1,532 1,738 6,278 6,740 13,148 46%
Potential 10 33 48 193 229 373 876 1,805 2,691 9%
Large mining 7,824 2,935 3,833 3,851 5,539 4,150 20,522 7,439 35,785 100%
Of which:
Base 6,002 1,444 6 0 0 0 1,450 0 7,451 22%
Probable 705 823 1,825 847 204 0 3,699 0 4,404 12%
Possible 582 415 1,022 1,649 2,495 1,380 6,961 1,297 8,840 25%
Potential 535 253 980 1,570 2,840 2,770 8,413 6,142 15,090 42%
Medium mining 278 232 644 683 237 0 1,795 0 2,073 100%
Of which:
Base 16 55 45 36 0 0 136 0 152 7%
Probable 70 90 179 197 62 0 527 0 597 29%
Possible 142 62 310 110 0 0 482 0 624 30%
Potential 50 25 110 340 175 0 650 0 700 34%
Metallurgy Plants 390 115 16 0 0 0 131 0 521 100%
Of which:
Base 390 115 16 0 0 0 131 0 521 100%
Discounting the US$ 10,800 million invested before 2015, the investment with possibilities of
implementation within the 2015 and 2024 period in copper mining reaches US$ 56,200 million, of
which US$ 39.9 million will be reached in the five year period from 2015 - 2019.
Analyzing the initiatives with the greatest probability of development within the timeframes
estimated by their owners, these corresponds to 38% of the investment to be implemented within
the next five years. Of this group, the projects in base condition make up 25.4% of the investment
to be obtained between 2015 and 2019, with a yearly average of 2.28 thousand million USD, leaving
an investment remained of less than one thousand million for after 2019, while the initiatives in a

probable condition only make up a yearly average of around US$ 1.06 thousand million, which
corresponds to just 7% of the financing to be obtained in the short term, specifically between 2015
and 2018.
Conversely, the projects with a lesser probability of being implemented within the proposed
timeframes correspond to 62% of the investment between 2015 and 2019, leaving a remnant of
almost US$ 16 thousand million for after 2019. In this group, the projects in possible condition
correspond to 34% of the investment in the five year period, contributing a yearly average of US$
2.7 thousand million, leaving a remnant of US$ 8.04 thousand million for later execution.
Furthermore, and unlike the previous register wherein the potential group made up the greatest
investment to be implemented in the five year period, this year these projects reach just 28% of the
total estimated for the next five years, supplying an average of US$ 1.99 thousand million, and
leaving an investment remnant for the 2020-2024 period of around US$ 7.95 thousand million
dollars.
4.2. Investment distribution in gold, iron, and industrial minerals

Table 12 summarizes the annual investment in the gold, iron and industrial ore mining segments:
Table 12: Yearly investment distribution in gold, iron, and industrial minerals according to condition
(MMUS$)
Gold-silver, iron, and
Before Subtotal 2020 - % of
industrial minerals 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TOTAL
2015 2015 -2019 2024 investment
according to condition
TOTAL 4,615 628 1,903 1,575 1,280 254 5,640 0 10,255 100.0%
Of which:
Base 178 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 198 3.6%
Probable 3,237 478 1,095 640 135 0 2,348 0 5,585 101.0%
Possible 1,200 130 808 935 1,145 254 3,272 0 4,472 80.9%
Gold 3,283 420 1,003 675 150 0 2,248 0 5,531 100.0%
Of which:
Probable 3,025 360 720 290 55 0 1,425 0 4,450 80.5%
Possible 258 60 283 385 95 0 823 0 1,081 19.5%
Iron 1,144 83 205 440 1,050 254 2,032 0 3,176 100.0%
Of which:
Base 178 20 0 0 0 0 20 0 198 6.2%
Probable 42 23 25 0 0 0 48 0 90 2.8%
Possible 924 40 180 440 1,050 254 1,964 0 2,888 90.9%
Industrial minerals 188 125 695 460 80 0 1,360 0 1,548 100.0%
Of which:
Probable 170 95 350 350 80 0 875 0 1,045 32.9%
Possible 18 30 345 110 0 0 485 0 503 32.5%

In gold mining, in investment in 5 projects for 5.5 thousand million dollars is expected, which is
concentrated in the probable condition, to be carried out before 2019. Furthermore, it is estimated
that the yearly average investment in the gold project portfolio reach 508 million dollars in the 2015-
2018 period.
For iron mining as well as industrial minerals there are no relevant variations in the investment
distribution seen.

5. Estimation of the copper production capacity in Chile through 20266

One of the most important effects coming from the mining investment portfolio is the increase in
the maximum production capacity, which translates to an increase in supply for the international
market.
Following is an estimate of the maximum copper production capacity which Chile could reach by
2026, as a result of the work in the current Operations and the contributions which will be added as
the new copper projects are implemented.
5.1. Maximum copper mining capacity in Chile

The maximum productive potential of copper mining in Chile is summarized in Table 13, which
indicates the yearly information from 2015 to 2026, broken down into operations and projects
according to their conditionality, as an indicator of the degree of reliability of this information. The
real production in 2014 is included as a means of reference and comparison. Additionally, the
percentage of yearly variation in the maximum capacity of total production is indicated.
Considering a horizon of 20267, Chile has the potential of reaching a copper production capacity of
7.56 million tons of copper, a 31.6% above the production registered in 2014, if all of the planned
projects are carried out according to their timelines. The maximum production would be registered
for this period during 2024, wherein the copper production would reach approximately 7.84 million
tons, 36.3% over 2014 production.
Table 13: Estimated production capacity of copper mining in Chile through 2026 (kt of fine Cu)8
CONDITION 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
BASE/ Operations 5,749.5 5,980.8 5.676.7 5,567.2 5,412.0 5,337.9 4,956.3 4,742.6 4,554.2 4,401.0 4,254.0 3,986.7 3,811.5
BASE/ Projects 0,0 359.1 585.8 737.3 748.4 768.7 797.5 907.1 1,000.8 1,139.6 1,190.0 1,255.0 1,270.0
PROBABLE/ Projects 0,0 0,0 0,0 217.6 430.9 479.3 463.8 444.9 435.4 414.0 393.7 314.3 302.0
POSSIBLE/ Projects Cu 0,0 0,0 0,0 18.7 51.9 375.0 546.1 632.2 650.9 770.8 942.4 1,136.4 1,227.8
POSSIBLE/ Projects Co-prod. 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 9.0 16.5 18.0 19.0 17.0 20.0 32,0 22.0 21.0
POTENTIAL/ Projects Cu 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 25.9 152.5 292.2 651.3 804.3 989.8 1,025.6 963.0 931.4
TOTAL 5,749.5 6,339.8 6,262.5 6,540.8 6,678.0 7,129.8 7,074.0 7,397.2 7,462.6 7,735.2 7,837.8 7,677.5 7,563.8
Yearly change --- 10.3% -1.2% 4.4% 2.1% 6.8% -0.8% 4.6% 0.9% 3.7% 1.3% -2.0% -1.5%
6
Copper mining production capacity corresponds to concentrates and SxEw cathodes. The methodologic criteria used to
estimate is shown in point 2.6
7
Two years after the last year of implementation registered in this registry (see methodologic criteria shown in point 2.6)
8
Includes the by-productive capacity of copper coming from the gold and iron projects.

This projection considers the natural declination in production of the current operations in 1.94
million tons, for which the greatest contribution corresponds to the impact in the investment in the
projects, which depend on distinct factors internally as well as externally to reach the productive
goals, which is determined through the conditionality of the projects.
The following graph shows how the copper production will evolve and the growing importance of
the contribution of the projects, to increase national productive capacity according to the condition
of these.
Figure 1: Maximum copper production capacity according to condition
9.000
8.000
Thousands of tons of fine copper
7.000
6.000
5.000
4.000
3.000
2.000
1.000
Base Probable Posible Potencial

The total estimate for the production capacity of the copper mining is distributed through the
respective copper production capacities in concentrates and in SxEw cathodes, which are shown in
tables 14 and 15 as follows.

Table 14: Estimated Chilean production capacity of fine copper concentrate through 2026 (kt of fine Cu)
CONDITION 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
BASE/ Operations 3,905.6 4,214.3 4,010.6 3,952.0 3,888.0 3,874.7 3,727.8 3,624.3 3,449.1 3,305.2 3,246.8 3,109.7 3,117.4
BASE/ Projects 0,0 325.7 487.0 620.8 626.2 645.6 674.7 783.8 882.2 1,023.6 1,112.6 1,178.0 1,193.4
POSSIBLE/ Projects Cu 0,0 0,0 0,0 18.7 47.9 369.6 539.5 625.9 644.6 764.5 936.1 1,130.1 1,221.7
POSSIBLE/ Projects Coprod. 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 9.0 16.5 18.0 19.0 17.0 20.0 32.0 22.0 21.0
POTENTIAL/ Projects Cu 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 25.9 152.5 292.2 651.3 804.3 989.8 1,025.6 963.0 931.4
TOTAL 3,905.6 4,540.1 4,497.6 4,712.7 4,917.2 5,421.0 5,598.9 6,036.5 6,119.8 6,404.4 6,643.6 6,672.9 6,746.9
Yearly Change --- 16.2% -0.9% 4.8% 4.3% 10.2% 3.3% 7.8% 1.4% 4.7% 3.7% 0.4% 1.1%
Table 15: Estimated Chilean production capacity for fine copper in SxEw cathodes through 2026 (Thousand
tons.)
CONDITION 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
BASE/ Operations 1,843.9 1,766.4 1,666.1 1,615.3 1,524.0 1,463.2 1,228.5 1,118.3 1,105.0 1,095.8 1,007.2 877.1 69.1
BASE/ Projects 0,0 33,3 98.8 116.4 122.2 123.0 122.8 123.2 118.6 116.0 77.4 77.0 76.6
POSSIBLE/ Projects 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 4.0 5.4 6.5 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.1
TOTAL 1,843.9 1,799.8 1,764.9 1,828.1 1,760.8 1,708.9 1,475.1 1,360.7 1,342.8 1,330.8 1,194.2 1,004.5 816.9
Yearly Change --- -2.4% -1.9% 3.6% -3.7% -3.0% -13.7% -7.8% -1.3% -0.9% -10.3% -15.9% -18.7%
In each table there is an opposing trend. While the production capacity in concentrates increments
by 2.84 million tons by 2026, a 70.9% increase from 2014, the SxEw cathodes may decrease by 1.03
million tons, registering a 55.7% decrease from the same year.
5.1.1. Analysis of hydrometallurgy production
The hydrometallurgical processing of copper into SxEw cathodes shows in the last decade strong
signs of decline since its peak in 2009, when it reached 2.12 million tons. The production of SxEw
cathodes will be maintained at about 1.8 million tons until 2017, to then decline rapidly by a yearly
average rate of 7.7% in the following ten years, reaching a production loss of 1.03 million tons of
SxEw cathodes (figure 6).
This decrease in SxEw cathode production is due mainly to the depletion of leachable resources and
the closing of some copper sites towards the end of the next decade, for example, Collahuasi,
Sagasca, Quebrada Blanca, Mantos Blancos, Michilla, Las Cenizas, Franke, Mantoverde and Carmen
de Andacollo. Likewise, it is observed that some of the operations of CODELCO, such as

Chuquicamata (Hidrosur), Radomiro Tomic and Salvador, will reduce their production due to the
depletion of leachable resources.
With respect to the hydrometallurgy projects considered in this portfolio, these principally
correspond to replacement projects and of marginal expansions of current operations, and of four
new projects: El Espino, Diego de Almagro and the production of oxides coming from the operations
of Distrito Centinela, by Antofagasta Minerals, and of Sierra Gorda, property of KGHM. There are
not currently any potential projects for the hydrometallurgy line.
This operational decrease has a direct effect in a lesser demand for sulphuric acid, which will cause
a change in the sulphuric acid market in Chile from the condition of structural deficit to an incipient
condition of excess by the year 2019. It is worth mentioning that the structural change in the
sulphuric market will have negative implications in the importation and exportation structure of this
good in the country, as an excess would force producers to export the excess acid, with the following
negative implication in the prices of this good.
Another impact is the closing of several solvent or electro-winning extraction plants, with no
alternative use.
Figure 6: Projection of maximum copper production in cathodes, 2014 2026 period
2.000
Thousand tons of copper in SxEw cathodes
1.800
1.600
1.400
1.200
Posible
Possible
1.000
Probable
Probable
800 Base
Base
600
400
200

5.1.2. Analysis of concentrate production
The project portfolio for 2015-2024 reaffirms that which has been observed in the past few years:
the structural change in copper production turns toward copper concentrate production, due to
diverse factors such as the geologic conditions of the country, the production changes from old
hydrometallurgical operations, etc. This will cause an increase in the maximum production capacity
of copper concentrate by 2.84 million tons of fine copper per year by 2026. With this the projected
decline will be surpassed from the current operations, without whose projects in development,
would decrease production by 788 thousand tons of fine copper with respects to 2014.
This substantial increase in production which comes from the concentrate line has strong
repercussions in two important aspects of the mining politics in general, which are the increase of
the exportable supply of concentrates, without increasing the current production of ER cathodes,
and the structural increase of costs in Chilean mining coming from the levels of mineral processing
which this type of processing increase brings.
Figure 7: Maximum production projection in copper concentrate, period 2014 - 2026
7.000
Thousand tons of fine copper concentrate
6.000
5.000
Potential
4.000 Potencial
Posible
Possible
3.000 Probable
Base
2.000
Base
1.000
a) Exportable concentrate offer from Chile

In 2014 2.55 million tons of copper concentrate were exported, equaling 65.3% of the concentrate
production of the country, the rest should be understood to have been consumed in the Chilean
foundries. Even though the production of the foundries reached 1.36 million tons of fine copper in
2014, previous years reached levels around 1.56 million tons of fine copper, which means that there

is the capacity of treating the equivalent of 1.6 million tons of fine copper content in the feeder
concentrates, due to the capacity expansion projects not being considered for the national
foundries9.
Toward 2026, the maximum copper production capacity in concentrates will reach 6.75 million tons,
reaching 89% of the national copper production participation. However, under the premise that no
FURE projects were to exist in the country, this increase in concentrate production would imply that
the potential exportation of concentrates would reach 5.2 million tons, or76.9% of the total Chilean
concentrate production.
Figure 8: Copper concentrate production and the participation in total production

Thousands of tons of fine copper in concentrate
10.000 100%
89%
9.000 83% 85% 87% 90%
82% 82%
79%
76%
8.000
72% 72% 72% 74% 80%
68%
7.000 70%
6.000 60%
5.000 50%
4.000 40%
3.000 30%
2.000 20%
1.000 10%
0 0%
Cobre en concentrados a FURE externa

Copper concentrates to external FURE
Cobre en concentrados a FURE nacional
Copper concentrates to national FURE
Part. decopper
Part of la prod. de cobre
concentrate en concentrados
production en la
in the countrys prod.
total prod.total del pas
Likewise, it is estimated that the volume of concentrates with copper concentrates will pass the
current 13.3 million tons, with an average ore grade of 29.2% copper, to 23.8 million tons, with the
average ore grade of 24.1$. Similarly, the volume of concentrates for exportation would surpass the
current8.67 million tons to almost double by 2026, reaching 17.26 million tons.
9
Only operational adjustments are expected to be required to comply with the gas emission requirements
(SO2 and others).

Figure 9: Projection of maximum production of copper concentrates according to destination, 2014 2026
period
25,0
Million tons of concentrate
20,0
15,0
10,0
5,0
0,0
Concentrates to
Concentrados a national FURE
FURE nacional Concentrates atoFURE
Concentrados external FURE
externa
This strong growth in concentrate production could affect the position of the exporters in the
negotiations for the costs of treatment and refining, affecting the liquid value of the return, and the
tributary utilities of the companies, leaving Chile with a lesser participation in the refined copper
business on a worldwide level.
Another problem related with this increase in concentrate production is the production of tailings
coming from the concentrating plants. Therefore it is estimated that if during 2014 563.5 Mt of
tailings were produced, by 2026 an increase of 121.8% will produced more per year, reaching
1,249.7 Mt of tailings (figure 10).

Figure 10: Projection of maximum tailings production as a result of the copper concentration process,
2014 - 2026
1.300
1.200
1.100
1.000
Million tons of tailings
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Base Probable Possible Potential

Base Probable Posible Potencial
b) Increase in processing levels and tailings generation

Adding to the natural decline of operational parameters in the existing sites it must be considered
that there are lower grades in the new projects to be carried out within the next decade, which
implies that the mining extraction capacity and of the concentration plants must be of a large size.
Figure 11 shows the projected yearly mineral treatment capacity in the concentration plants which
are currently in operation, as well as the contribution of the projects are they are implemented
according to what is anticipated from the available information.

Figure 11: Processing capacity in copper concentrating plants through 2026

1.400,0
1.200,0
Million tons of sulphered minerals
1.000,0 POTENCIAL
POTENTIAL
POSSIBLE
POSIBLE
800,0
PROBABLE
PROBABLE
600,0
BASE
BASE
400,0
200,0
0,0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Taking this data and comparing it with the fine copper contained in the concentrate to be produced
within the next decade, an unfavorable tendency is shown starting in 2015. With a yearly growth
rate of 3.4% of fine copper obtainable between the years of 2015 and 2026, the growth rate of the
ore treatment would be of 5.6% yearly, from 576.9 million tons of mineral treated in 2014 to an
estimated 1,273.5 million tons of ore to be treated by 2026 (figure 12).

Figure 12: Relationship between treated mineral and fine copper content in produced concentrate
Mt of sulphured ore
Mt of fine copper in concentrate
14 1.400
12 1.200
10 1.000
8 800
6 600
4 400
2 200
0 0
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Production of fine copper concentrate Processed Mineral in concentration plant
Produccin de cobre fino en concentrados Mineral procesado en planta concentradora
Direct consequences of this structural situation, which signifies a greater quantity of material to be
extracted:
a. Greater capital investment and operation costs.
b. Greater consumption intensity per unit of copper recovered.
c. Greater consumption of water and other inputs depending more on the volume of the
material to be treated than the copper content.
Furthermore, several of the concentrate projects are considering the use of sea water, with or
without desalination, as well as the impulsion system to the place of operations. For this concept
the capital costs would also rise for the required installations and the operation, because of the
electricity consumed. This last also requires a clear policy to define the correct manner to introduce
this new hydrological market in the country.
In summary, if currently 10,849 tpd are produced of fine copper concentrate, as a product of the
processing of 1.60 Mtpd of tailings (amounts from 2014), the copper mining project portfolio for
2015-2024 will increase the fine copper concentrate to 18,741 tpd, the product of the processing of
around 3.54 Mtpd of minerals in the concentration plants, which will generate around 3.47 Mtpd of
tailings toward 2026. This signifies an increase in daily treatment and tailings generation of close to
121% only to increase the daily copper production by 32%.

5.2. Maximum production capacity of copper mines per region

As well as observing the global behavior of copper production in the country, it is necessary to look
at how it is manifested on a regional level, where the investment process has an economic impact
which is prolonged after the product of the investment is transformed into operations. The
magnitude and use of the maximum production capacity is what generates the long term effect on
the activities directly related with the mining, and very importantly, in the diversity of the activities
indirectly provided of goods and services which is very relevant to the region where it is carried out.
The following tables show the production capacity estimates of copper mining corresponding to
each productive region, breaking them down for the respective profiles of maximum concentrates
and SxEw cathodes.
Table 16: Maximum regional productive capacity of copper mines in Chile through 2026 (thousands of
tons of fine copper)
REGION 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
XV. Arica-Parinacota 2.0 4.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 2.3
Operations 2.0 4.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 2.3
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
I. Tarapac 608.0 668.7 663.4 661.0 656.6 720.3 728.3 769.1 769.1 753.1 735.5 664.8 657.7
Operations 608.0 668.7 663.4 584.5 580.1 534.5 485.7 473.5 473.5 461.6 461.6 450.0 450.0
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.5 76.5 185.8 242.6 295.6 295.6 291.5 273.9 214.8 207.8
II. Antofagasta 3,047.6 3,458.4 3,330.0 3,565.0 3,490.3 3,828.9 3,796.3 3,998.1 4,020.3 4,215.6 4,190.4 3,947.4 3,837.9
Operations 3,047.6 3,108.1 2.765.6 2,757.0 2,621.5 2,592.6 2,372.2 2,205.0 2,045.9 1,980.5 1,897.0 1,696.1 1,600.4
Projects 0.0 350.4 564.4 808.0 868.9 1,236.4 1,424.0 1,793.2 1,974.4 2,235.1 2,293.3 2,251.3 2,237.4
III. Atacama 430.8 538.0 560.3 606.6 793.0 837.8 809.6 894.2 928.9 1,013.7 1,061.0 992.2 980.7
Operations 430.8 538.0 560.3 564.8 561.9 585.6 489.9 470.6 456.0 438.0 424.2 409.6 398.9
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 231.2 252.2 319.7 423.6 473.0 575.7 636.8 582.6 581.8
IV. Coquimbo 493.2 485.2 491.2 503.7 550.9 570.3 573.0 566.3 564.3 560.2 573.0 555.6 554.4
Operations 493.2 485.2 491.2 484.9 490.0 481.9 472.1 466.6 466.5 461.0 460.9 454.8 454.8
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.7 60.9 88.4 100.8 99.8 97.8 99.2 112.1 100.8 99.6
V. Valparaso 290.2 278.7 288.5 283.6 275.4 265.6 271.4 269.5 289.3 302.5 407.3 647.6 669.5
Operations 290.2 278.7 288.5 283.6 275.4 265.6 271.4 269.5 289.3 302.5 319.3 336.7 315.5
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.0 310.9 354.0
XIII. Metropolitana 404.5 434.6 434.2 429.2 428.7 423.6 423.7 418.7 418.2 413.4 393.8 389.5 389.2
Operations 404.5 434.6 434.2 429.2 428.7 423.6 423.7 418.7 418.2 413.4 393.8 389.5 389.2
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
VI. O'Higgins 473.1 471.5 489.1 486.0 477.2 478.0 466.4 475.8 467.5 471.8 471.9 475.6 472.1
Operations 473.1 462.8 467.6 457.3 448.6 448.9 436.0 433.4 399.8 339.1 292.3 245.3 200.5
Projects 0.0 8.7 21.4 28.7 28.7 29.1 30.4 42.4 67.7 132.7 179.6 230.3 271.6
TOTAL 5,749.5 6,339.8 6,262.5 6,540.8 6,678.0 7,129.8 7,074.0 7,397.2 7,462.6 7,735.2 7,837.8 7,677.5 7,563.8
Operations 5,749.5 5,980.8 5,676.7 5,567.2 5,412.0 5,337.9 4,956.3 4,742.6 4,554.2 4,401.0 4,254.0 3,986.7 3,811.5
Projects 0.0 359.1 585.8 973.6 1,266.0 1,791.9 2,117.6 2,654.5 2,908.5 3,334.2 3,583.8 3,690.7 3,752.2

Table 17: Maximum regional productive capacity of fine copper concentrates by2026 (Thousands of tons)
REGION 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Operations 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
I. Tarapac 445.4 511.1 511.1 498.2 498.2 599.3 656.1 700.7 700.7 684.7 676.4 664.8 657.7
Operations 445.4 511.1 511.1 498.2 498.2 485.7 485.7 473.5 473.5 461.6 461.6 450.0 450.0
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 113.6 170.4 227.2 227.2 223.1 214.8 214.8 207.8
II. Antofagasta 1,558.9 2,028.2 1,922.7 2,111.2 2,107.2 2,465.9 2,553.7 2,863.9 2,898.7 3,097.9 3,176.7 3,057.4 3.,27.9
Operations 1,558.9 1,711.2 1,457.1 1,439.6 1,390.6 1,392.6 1,292.6 1,234.0 1,083.0 1,018.8 1,000.8 923.0 1,007.0
Projects 0.0 317.0 465.6 671.6 716.6 1,073.3 1,261.2 1,630.0 1,815.8 2,079.1 2,175.9 2,134.3 2,120.8
III. Atacama 309.1 412.9 441.8 480.4 667.4 704.3 731.8 817.7 856.5 948.7 999.3 934.5 927.5
Operations 309.1 412.9 441.8 438.6 440.4 457.1 417.1 398.6 388.0 377.2 366.7 356.1 345.7
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 41.7 227.0 247.2 314.7 419.2 468.5 571.5 632.6 578.4 581.8
IV. Coquimbo 477.8 466.9 473.6 486.7 524.8 545.4 556.7 550.3 548.3 544.4 557.2 540.6 539.6
Operations 477.8 466.9 473.6 468.0 468.0 462.4 462.4 456.9 456.9 451.5 451.5 446.1 446.1
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.7 56.9 83.0 94.3 93.5 91.5 92.9 105.8 94.5 93.5
V. Valparaso 274.9 264.3 274.3 269.6 261.6 252.0 258.0 256.3 276.3 289.7 394.7 637.1 659.1
Operations 274.9 264.3 274.3 269.6 261.6 252.0 258.0 256.3 276.3 289.7 306.7 326.2 305.1
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 88.0 310.9 354.0
Operations 368.3 387.2 387.2 382.6 382.6 378.1 378.1 373.7 373.7 369.3 369.3 364.9 364.9
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
VI. O'Higgins 471.3 469.5 487.1 484.0 475.2 476.0 464.4 473.8 465.5 469.8 469.9 473.6 470.1
Operations 471.3 460.8 465.6 455.3 446.6 446.9 434.0 431.4 397.8 337.1 290.3 243.3 198.5
Projects 0.0 8.7 21.4 28.7 28.7 29.1 30.4 42.4 67.7 132.7 179.6 230.3 271.6
TOTAL 3,905.6 4,540.1 4,497.6 4,712.7 4,917.2 5,421.0 5,598.9 6,036.5 6,119.8 6,404.4 6,643.6 6,672.9 6,746.9
Operations 3,905.6 4,214.3 4,010.6 3,952.0 3,888.0 3,874.7 3,727.8 3,624.3 3,449.1 3,305.2 3,246.8 3,109.7 3,117.4
Projects 0.0 325.7 487.0 760.7 1,029.2 1,546.2 1,871.0 2,412.1 2,670.7 3,099.2 3,396.7 3,563.3 3,629.5

Table 18: Maximum regional productive capacity of fine copper in SxEw cathodes by 2026 (Thousands of
tons)
REGION 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
Operations 2.0 4.7 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.8 2.3
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
I. Tarapac 162.6 157.6 152.3 162.8 158.4 121.0 72.2 68.4 68.4 68.4 59.1 0.0 0.0
Operations 162.6 157.6 152.3 86.3 81.9 48.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 76.5 76.5 72.2 72.2 68.4 68.4 68.4 59.1 0.0 0.0
II. Antofagasta 1,488.7 1,430.2 1,407.3 1,453.8 1,383.1 1,363.1 1,242.5 1,134.2 1,121.6 1,117.7 1,013.6 890.1 710.0
Operations 1,488.7 1,396.9 1,308.5 1,317.4 1,230.9 1,200.0 1,079.7 971.0 963.0 961.7 896.3 773.1 593.4
Projects 0.0 33.3 98.8 136.4 152.2 163.0 162.8 163.2 158.6 156.0 117.4 117.0 116.6
III. Atacama 121.7 125.1 118.6 126.2 125.6 133.4 77.9 76.5 72.4 65.0 61.7 57.7 53.2
Operations 121.7 125.1 118.6 126.2 121.4 128.4 72.9 72.1 68.0 60.8 57.5 53.5 53.2
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 5.0 5.0 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.3 4.2 0.0
IV. Coquimbo 15.5 18.3 17.6 17.0 26.1 24.9 16.3 16.0 15.9 15.9 15.8 15.0 14.8
Operations 15.5 18.3 17.6 17.0 22.1 19.5 9.7 9.7 9.6 9.5 9.5 8.7 8.6
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 5.4 6.5 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.1
V. Valparaso 15.3 14.4 14.2 14.0 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.6 10.5 10.3
Operations 15.3 14.4 14.2 14.0 13.8 13.6 13.4 13.2 13.0 12.8 12.6 10.5 10.3
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Operations 36.2 47.5 47.1 46.5 46.0 45.5 45.5 45.1 44.6 44.1 24.5 24.6 24.3
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
VI. O'Higgins 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Operations 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Projects 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
TOTAL 1,843.9 1,799.8 1,764.9 1,828.1 1,760.8 1,708.9 1,475.1 1,360.7 1,342.8 1,330.8 1,194.2 1,004.5 816.9
Operations 1,843.9 1,766.4 1,666.1 1,615.3 1,524.0 1,463.2 1,228.5 1,118.3 1,105.0 1,095.8 1,007.2 877.1 694.1
Projects 0.0 33.3 98.8 212.9 236.9 245.7 246.6 242.4 237.8 235.0 187.0 127.5 122.7
Antofagasta, maintains the leadership of copper production, making up 50.7% of the maximum
production expected by 2026. Even though the production of concentrates will increase by 100.6%,
this will only create an net increase of 50.7%, affected by the loss seen of 778.7 thousand tons of
SxEw cathodes, equaling -52.3% of the production from 2014.
Atacama will maintain the second place in copper production, with a high level of production
increase which will be raised specifically by an increase of almost 200%, coming not only from the
copper production initiatives, but also from the coproduction of the projects of gold and iron mining,
which would leave available a capacity of 980 thousand tons of fine copper, over the 430.8 thousand
tons produced in 2014. As in the Antofagasta region, the productive increase in concentrate will
help to reduce the productive loss coming from the hydrometallurgical operations, which will fall by
-56.3% by 2026. Furthermore, this region is affected by situations which will slow the development
of the projects, even more if we consider that the greater part of the projects from this region have

a lesser probability of implementation within the time frames estimated by the companies (possible
and potential).
Valparaiso, in this report, displaces Tarapac as the third most important region, for two important
motives. The first is due to Tarapac suffering a strong decline in production towards 2024 where
four of the most important hydrometallurgical operations, Cerro Colorado, Quebrada Blanca,
Collahuasi, and Sagasca, stop operating, thereby losing almost 163 thousand tons of fine copper,
some of which are slightly recovered by the sulphuric operations of Collahuasi and the Quebrada
Blanca Hipgeno project. Tarapac, the third most important, bases the productive development
on the potential expansion of Collahuasi, however if it is not completed within the time frame, the
region will see the copper production capacity drastically reduced.
The second reason that it has passed the third place of productive growth to the region of Valparaso
is the implementation within the period of the expansion of Andina, with which it will increase the
production level from 290.2 thousand tons of fine copper registered in 2014 to 669.5 thousand tons
by 2026, creating an increase of 130.7%, which is the greatest regional increase during the period,
and slightly higher than the increase of Atacama.
Coquimbo will remain in fifth place, with contributions from El Espino, Domingo and the expansion
Marginal of Los Pelambres. Likewise, OHiggins will remain in the sixth place for growth, due to the
increase in production foreseen with the implementation of the Nuevo Nivel Mina in El Teniente,
and the Metropolitan region remains with a relatively stable production because of the contribution
to the Los Bronces -- Phase VII project.
Finally we can deduce that the mining investment will diminish in the northern zone of the country,
and stepping up in the center-south zone with the following offsetting of the productive increases
to this zone.
5.3. Global estimate of production capacity of other minerals

The estimate of the contribution to the maximum production capacity thought 2026 for mineral
substances such as gold, silver, molybdenum, iron and industrial minerals will only be done on a
global level, and not yearly, different from what has been shown previously in the projections of
copper production.
For gold, molybdenum, and iron, the maximum production capacity is shown, according to the
background information of the compiled projects, comparing the current situation with respects to
the possible scenario toward 2026. In the case of silver, for being a co-product which depends on
the gold mining activities, only the maximum estimated production of the country will be seen for
each project, and the possible contribution to the maximum production capacity of the country once
the projects being their operations. For industrial minerals only the contributions for each project
considered in this portfolio will be shown.

5.3.1. Gold and silver production capacity
The summary of the contribution of the projects to the portfolio to the maximum production
capacity for gold and silver, respectively, is observed in table 19.
Table 19: Contribution to maximum production capacity of gold and silver according to project
MAX. PRODUCTION
Gold Silver
PROJECT CONTROLLER IMPLEMENTATION
(Kg Au (ton Ag
content) content)
Gold mining (primary production reposition)

La Coipa Fase 7 Compaa Minera Mantos de Oro 2017 6,220 ---
Gold Mining (primary production additional)
Nueva Esperanza - Arqueros Laguna Resources Chile 2016 500 170
Pascua Ca. Minera Nevada 2016 19,830 825
Caspiche xidos Eton Chile 2017 3,800 ---
Cerro Maricunga Atacama Pacific Gold Chile 2017 6,840 ---
Copper mining (secondary production additional)
Planta Recuperadora de Metales Planta Recuperadora de Metales SpA 2016 5,000 500
Santo Domingo Minera Santo Domingo 2017 470 ---
El Espino El Espino S.A. 2017 780 ---
Productora Sociedad Minera El guila Ltda. 2018 1,307 ---
Diego de Almagro Compaa Minera Sierra Norte S.A. 2018 713 ---
Distrito Centinela Minera Centinela 2019 4,670 ---
Total production contribution 43,910 1,495
Source: Prepared by COCHILCO.
The contribution of gold mining in Chile comes from two sources: directly from gold mining (primary
production) and as a co-product of copper mining (secondary production). Thanks to the
contribution of the registered projects, through 2026 the maximum production capacity of thus
metal could reach 80.5 tons of gold content, a 75% increase over the 46 tons registered in 2014.
In the case of silver, the projects in this report will reach some 1,495 tpa of silver by 2026 over the
current production, which in 2014 reached 1.572 tons of silver.
5.3.2. Molybdenum production capacity
Molybdenum production in the country is a by-product of copper mining. In the last 10 years
between 33.7 thousand and 48.8 thousand tpa of Mo concentrate has been recovered as
molybdenite (MoS2) wherein in 2014 reached the maximum production of the last decade.
Some copper projects in the investment portfolio also contemplate the reclaiming of molybdenum:

a) New projects which consider recovering molybdenum as a co-product of the future copper
concentrate production. For this effect the projects considered are: Actualizacin de
Esperanza, Spence Growth Project, Quebrada Blanca Fase II and Relincho.
b) Initiatives which seek to expand or replace current concentrate production, and therefore,
will permit to maintain the stable current production of molybdenum and to supply new
production. Among the initiatives associated with this type of project are the structured
projects of CODELCO.
The total contribution of the aforementioned projects is shown in table 20.
Table 20: Maximum molybdenum production capacities per project
Maximum
Project Controller Implementation production
(tpa)
Valle Central Expansin Minera Valle Central 2015 360
Actualizacin Esperanza Minera Esperanza 2015 6,000
Sulfuros RT Fase II Div. Radomiro Tomic 2019 - 2022 10,000
Spence Growth Project Pampa Norte 2019 3,800
Rajo Inca Div. Salvador 2020 2,000
Chuquicamata Subterrnea Div. Chuquicamata 2020 22,000
Quebrada Blanca Fase II Teck 2020 5,200
Nuevo Nivel Mina Div. El Teniente 2021 8,000
Relincho Teck 2022 5,100
Nueva Andina Fase II Div. Andina 2024 7,000
Total contribution- production maintenance 69,460
Therefore it is estimated that by 2026 the maximum capacity for molybdenum recovery will reach
95.6 thousand tpa, a 96% growth rate with respects to the production from 2014, which implies an
average yearly growth rate of 5.3% until 2026.
5.3.3. Iron production capacity
The production level of iron mining reached 18.87 Mt of iron ore in 2014, equaling approximately
11.1 Mt of fine Fe content.10
The primary iron production or co-production projects in this update will contribute 18.8 Mt of iron
ore by 2026, making approximately 11.9 Mt of fine content iron.
The details of the estimated contribution of the projects is shown in table 21.
10
Iron products have an iron content of between 58 and 65%.

Table 21: Estimate of new iron production capacities per project
Maximum production (ktpa)

Project Controller Implementation
Iron
Fine content
minerals
Iron mining
Romeral Fase V CAP 2015 2,500 1,475
Oso Negro Minera San Fierro 2016 1,091 600
Dominga Andes Iron 2018 11,000 7,370
Copper mining
Santo Domingo Capstone Mining 2017 4,200 2,478
Total contribution to Fe production capacity 18,791 11,923
Source: Prepared by COCHILCO.
To summarize, due to the project portfolio with direct iron production, or associated co-production,
the maximum production of the country by 2026 will be situated around 33.3 Mt of iron ore, which
reflects an 80% growth with respects to that registered in 2014.
5.3.4. Industrial minerals
Among the investment projects in the area of saltpeter, is found the Pampa Blanca Expansion by
SQM, displaced in the previous time frame by two years, and the Arbiodo Project by Ingenieros
Asesores Ltda., linked to national capitals, which is in the process of restructuring the EIA presented
in March of 2015 and then withdrawn by the company. The first plans to increase the production
of iodide, by SQM to 10,000tpa of iodine equivalent and produce around 1,293,000 tpa of NaNO3.
The second initiative seeks to produce around 2,700 tpa of iodine and 400,000 tpa of nitrates,
including 20,000 tpa of boric acid.
In another area of non-metal mining, White Mountain Titanium with the Cerro Blanco project will
produce titanium dioxide (TiO2) at an estimated capacity of 200 ktpa of concentrate (95% TiO2), by
2016. It is worth noting that this project is only waiting for the investment decision, as in May of
2015 it received the approved RCA from the Environmental Evaluation Service.

6. Comparison of the project portfolios in 2015 and 2014

The investment project portfolio in Chilean mining updated in July of 2015 contemplates 41
initiatives, versus the 53 included in the project portfolio informed in July of 201411, 12 but with a
smaller investment estimated in 29,062 million dollars.
The changes registered in the condition of implementation, timeframe and value observed in the
2015 portfolio with respects to the previous correspond principally to the following:
a) The implementation of 6 projects considered in the 2014 portfolio, valued in US$ 7,587
million, which are excluded in the new portfolio.
b) Ten initiatives were removed from the portfolio for restructuring or because the owning
companies are in the process of adjusting their assets, for which there is no clear date when
they are going to reinitiate the studies or the investment decision, which reach an estimated
investment in 2014 of US$ 28,223 million. Of these projects only El Morro was affected by
issues related with Convenio 169 of the OIT, which translated into the approved RCA being
annulled and a return to the pre-feasibility stage of engineering studies.
c) Five new projects were incorporated into the portfolio with a value of US$ 5,580 million. Of
these, four correspond to copper mining, one of which is an expansion of Los Bronces, a
renewal project in Quebrada Blanca, which will allow for a future project of Sulphur, and
the new BHP Billiton project which plans to extend the lifespan of the Spence site through
a Sulphur line and the expansion of the Sulphur line and a new oxides line for the new
operations at Sierra Gorda, by KGHM. The fifth project belongs to industrial minerals
(Arbiodo).
d) There are 10 projects which did not see any changes with respects to the report from 2014,
evaluated in US$ 11,103 million.
e) The Escondida OGP I is the only project which only announced a modification in the
investment amount, from US$ 3,838 million estimated in 2014 to US$ 4,199 million, which
is a net increase of 361 million dollars.
f) Furthermore for eight projects the companies have announced a delay in the previous
implementation date by one to three years, notwithstanding there not being a change in
the conditions of realization, nor in the budgeted investment amount, which reaches US$
18,416 million.
11 Considering Other development projects and Information projects of Codelco in both portfolios.
12
See Investment in Chilean mining- Project portfolio 2014-2023 (DE 06/2014)

g) Finally, sixteen initiatives show modifications in their condition of materialization, value

and/or timeframes for implementation. Positive cases include Encuentro Oxidos and
Modifications El Tesoro from Antofagasta Minerals, which passed on to base condition, as
did Chuquicamata Subterranea, however this last suffered a years delay with respect to the
previous report. The changes in these initiatives generated an increase in the net
investment by US$ 2,709 million.
The projects which are in this position are duly marked in tables 22 and 23, wherein the projects are
consigned to the list of projects in the portfolio with the variations registered with regards to the
previous year.

Table 22: Comparison of investment portfolios 2015 vs 2014 (part 1)

CONDITION CONDITION DIFFERENCE IN
IMPEMENTATION INVESTMENT INVESTMENT
IMPLEMENTATION PER PER INVESTMENT
PROJECTS PORTFOLIO REGION PORTFOLIO 2014 PORTFOLIO 2015
PORTFOLIO 2015 PORTFOLIO PORTFOLIO 2015 - 2014
2014 (MMUS$) (MMUS$)
2014 2015 (MMUS$)
6 PROJECTS WHICH WERE IMPLEMENTED 7,587 --- -7,587
PAMPA HERMOSA 2014 2014 Tarapac BASE --- 1,033 --- -1,033
CERRO NEGRO NORTE 2014 2014 Atacama BASE --- 1,200 --- -1,200
ESCONDIDA NUEVA PILA LIXIVIACIN XIDOS 2014 2014 Antofagasta BASE --- 721 --- -721
PLANTA NITRATO POTASIO (NPT4) COYA SUR 2014 2014 Antofagasta BASE --- 250 --- -250
SIERRA GORDA 2014 2014 Antofagasta BASE --- 4,240 --- -4,240
BELLAVISTA 2015 2014 Atacama BASE --- 143 --- -143
10 PROJECTS REMOVED FROM PORTFOLIO FOR RESTRUCTURING 28,223 --- -28,223
JERNIMO 2016 --- Atacama PROBABLE --- 423 --- -423
LOMAS BAYAS III SULFUROS 2018 --- Antofagasta POTENTIAL --- 1,600 --- -1,600
TOVAKU 2018 --- Antofagasta POTENTIAL --- 600 --- -600
LOBO - MARTE 2019 --- Atacama POTENTIAL --- 800 --- -800
INCA DE ORO 2019 --- Atacama POTENTIAL --- 600 --- -600
VOLCN 2019 --- Atacama POTENTIAL --- 800 --- -800
CERRO CASALE 2020 --- Atacama POTENTIAL --- 6,000 --- -6,000
EL MORRO 2021 --- Atacama POTENTIAL --- 3,900 --- -3,900
COLLAHUASI EXPANSIN FASE III 2022 --- Tarapac POTENTIAL --- 6,500 --- -6,500
AMPLIACIN LOS PELAMBRES IV 2022 --- Coquimbo POTENTIAL --- 7,000 --- -7,000
5 NEW PROJECTS INCORPORATED TO PORTFOLIO 2014 --- 5,580 5,580
ACTUALIZACIN QUEBRADA BLANCA --- 2016 Tarapac --- PROBABLE --- 165 165
SIERRA GORDA EXPANSIN 220 KTPD --- 2017 Antofagasta --- PROBABLE --- 1,500 1,500
ARBIODO --- 2017 Antofagasta --- POSSIBLE --- 503 503
LOS BRONCES - FASE 7 --- 2017 Metropolitana --- PROBABLE --- 112 112
SPENCE GROWTH OPTION --- 2019 Antofagasta --- POSSIBLE --- 3,300 3,300
10 PROJECTS NOT MODIFIED 11,103 11,103 0
ANTUCOYA 2015 2015 Antofagasta BASE BASE 1,900 1,900 0
ACTUALIZACIN ESPERANZA 2015 2015 Antofagasta BASE BASE 630 630 0
VALLE CENTRAL EXPANSIN 2015 2015 O'Higgins BASE BASE 152 152 0
PLANTA RECUPERADORA DE METALES 2016 2016 Antofagasta BASE BASE 96 96 0
CASPICHE XIDOS 2017 2017 Atacama POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 344 344 0
CERRO COLORADO CONTINUIDAD OPERACIONAL 2017 2017 Tarapac PROBABLE PROBABLE 467 467 0
EL ESPINO 2017 2017 Coquimbo POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 624 624 0
PRODUCTORA 2018 2018 Atacama POTENTIAL POTENTIAL 700 700 0
AMPLIACIN MARGINAL LOS PELAMBRES 2018 2018 Coquimbo POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 1,190 1,190 0
EL ABRA MILL PROJECT (e) 2021 2021 Antofagasta POTENTIAL POTENTIAL 5,000 5,000 0
(e) Implementation estimated by COCHILCO, based on public information from the companies
Source: Prepared by Cochilco, based on public information from the mining companies.
Table 23: Comparison of investment portfolios 2015 vs 2014 (part 2)

CONDITION CONDITION DIFFERENCE IN
INVESTMENT INVESTMENT
IMPLEMENTATION IMPLEMENTATION PER PER INVESTMENT
PROJECTS REGION PORTFOLIO 2014 PORTFOLIO 2015
PORTFOLIO 2014 PORTFOLIO 2015 PORTFOLIO PORTFOLIO 2015 - 2014
(MMUS$) (MMUS$)
2014 2015 (MMUS$)
1 PROJECT THAT ONLY CHANGED VALUE 3,838 4,199 361
ESCONDIDA OGP I 2015 2015 Antofagasta BASE BASE 3,838 4,199 361
8 PROJECTS THAT ONLY HAD A DELAY IN THE TIMEFRAME 18,416 18,416 0
ROMERAL FASE V 2014 2015 Coquimbo BASE BASE 198 198 0
NUEVA ESPERANZA - ARQUEROS 2016 2017 Atacama POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 150 150 0
CERRO BLANCO (e) 2016 2017 Atacama POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 380 380 0
PASCUA (e) 2016 2017 Atacama PROBABLE PROBABLE 4,250 4,250 0
CANDELARIA 2030 2017 2018 Atacama PROBABLE PROBABLE 460 460 0
DOMINGA 2018 2019 Coquimbo POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 2,888 2,888 0
QUEBRADA BLANCA HIPGENO (e) 2019 2020 Tarapac POTENTIAL POTENTIAL 5,590 5,590 0
RELINCHO (e) 2021 2022 Atacama POTENTIAL POTENTIAL 4,500 4,500 0
16 PROJECTS THAT WERE REDEFINED CHANGING VALUE, CONDITION AND/OR TIMEFRAME 31,359 34,068 2,709
AMPLIAC. PAMPA BLANCA 2015 2017 Antofagasta BASE PROBABLE 665 665 0
PLANTA DE TRATAMIENTO DE MOLIBDENO 2015 2016 Antofagasta BASE BASE 394 425 31
OSO NEGRO 2015 2016 Atacama POSSIBLE PROBABLE 90 90 0
MODIFICACIONES EL TESORO 2016 2016 Antofagasta PROBABLE BASE 86 86 0
ENCUENTRO XIDOS 2016 2016 Antofagasta PROBABLE BASE 600 636 36
CERRO MARICUNGA 2017 2018 Atacama POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 515 587 72
LA COIPA FASE 7 (e) 2017 2018 Atacama POSSIBLE PROBABLE 200 200 0
SANTO DOMINGO 2017 2018 Atacama POSSIBLE PROBABLE 1,700 1,700 0
DIEGO DE ALMAGRO 2018 2018 Atacama POSSIBLE PROBABLE 597 597 0
SULFUROS RT FASE II 2018 2019 Antofagasta POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 5,226 5,459 233
CHUQUICAMATA SUBTERRNEA 2019 2020 Antofagasta POSSIBLE BASE 4,115 3,816 -299
DESARROLLO DISTRITO CENTINELA (*) 2020 2019 Antofagasta POTENTIAL POSSIBLE 2,700 4,350 1,650
NUEVO NIVEL MINA 2018 2021 O'Higgins BASE BASE 3,431 4,920 1,489
RAJO INCA 2019 2020 Atacama POTENTIAL POTENTIAL 3,036 2,691 -345
TRASPASO MINA-PLANTA 2021 2022 Valparaso BASE BASE 1,417 1,323 -94
NUEVA ANDINA FASE II 2023 2024 Valparaso POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 6,586 6,524 -62
OTHER INVESTMENTS BY CODELCO 4,325 3,923 -402
OTHER DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 2014 - 2018 2015 - 2019 Various BASE BASE 3,123 2,758 -365
INFORMATION PROJECTS 2014 - 2018 2015 - 2019 Various POSSIBLE POSSIBLE 1,203 1,165 -38
DIFFERENCE IN THE PORTFOLIO 2014 vs 2015 (MMUS$) -27,562
(e) Implementation estimated by COCHILCO, based on public information from the mining companies
(*) In 2013 it was called "Distrito Centinela", after 2014 just "Encuentro Sulfuros"
Source: Prepared by Cochilco, based on public information from the mining companies.
Furthermore, it is POSSIBLE to see the most important global changes between both portfolios
according to the implementation condition and mining type, an association between both previous
scenarios, and a regional comparison of the investment (tables 24, 25, 26 y 27).
Table 23: Comparison of portfolios 2015 and 2014 per project condition
2014 2023 2015 - 2024

Condition of
materialization Investment Part. % of Project Investment Part. % of Project
(MMUS$) total Quantity (MMUS$) total Quantity
BASE 23,431 22,3% 17 21,139 27.4% 13
PROBABLE 6,286 6,0% 6 10,206 13.2% 11
POSSIBLE 25,808 24,6% 15 27,464 35.5% 13
POTENTIAL 49,326 47,0% 15 18,481 23.9% 5
BASE + PROBABLE 29,717 28,3% 23 31,345 40.6% 24
POSSIBLE + POTENTIAL 75,134 71,7% 30 45,945 59.4% 18
In the previous table it is seen that the portfolio with the highest probability of completion within
the timeline estimated by the owning companies (base + probable) remain almost stable, in number
of investments as well as in investment amount (increase in US$ 1,628 million), however, it changes
from having a 28.3% participation of the total portfolio in 2014 to being 40.6% of the portfolio in
2015. It is possible to take from this comparison that two initiatives passed from probably to base,
one initiative in probable condition was removed from the portfolio for restructuring, and one is
added to the probable condition, specifically the Sierra Gorda expansion, and five advance from the
possible and potential conditions up to probable.
On the contrary, those initiatives with a lesser probability of maintaining the advancement terms
indicated by their owners and investors (possible and potential) diminished by almost 30%, due in
part to the removal of 9 initiatives from the potential category for restructuring13 and the change
of five projects to probable condition. However, to this group two new initiatives were added,
Arbiodo and Spence Growth Project as possible. This shows that the weakness of the investment
portfolio is in this group.
Table 25 shows the comparison according to mining type, wherein it is observed that the project
portfolio for copper is reduced by almost 17% due in part to the removal of the Escondida Nueva
Pila de Lixiviacin and Sierra Gorda, both of which have been in operation since the first trimester
of 2014, mainly because of the removal from the 2014-2024 portfolio the expansion initiatives of
Collahuasi and Los Pelambres.
13
Letter b) chapter 6, which indicates the removal of 10 of the initiatives of which 9 are potential and one
probable.
Table 24: Comparison of portfolios 2015 and 2014 by type of mining
2014 - 2023 2015 2024

Type of mining Investment Part. % of Project Investment Part. % of Project
(MMUS$) total Quantity (MMUS$) total Quantity
CODELCO 28,137 26.8% 8 28,656 37.1% 8
Large mining - Cu 48,722 46.5% 18 35,785 46.3% 17
Medium mining - Cu 3,273 3.1% 6 2,073 2.7% 4
Gold 17,382 16.6% 10 5,531 7.2% 5
Metallurgy Plants 490 0.5% 2 521 0.7% 2
Iron 4,519 4.3% 5 3,176 4.1% 3
Industrial Minerals 2,328 2.2% 4 1,548 2.0% 3
Copper 80,622 76.9% 34 67,035 86.7% 31
Gold 17,382 16.6% 10 5,531 7.2% 5
Other14 6,847 6.5% 9 4,724 6.1% 6
It is to be noted that the sector most affected is gold and silver mining, where the investment
portfolio was reduced by 68%, due to the removal of five initiatives, among which Cerro Casale and
El Morro stand out, the first affected indirectly by the problems which Barrick has had to deal with
to carry out Pascua Lama, while the second is due to problems related with communities and
investment reducing policies which the company GoldCorp has had on a worldwide level. The
comparison between the investment destination and the condition of the projects may be seen in
table 26.
Table 25: Comparison of portfolios 2015 and 2014 by type of mining and conditionality of the projects
2014-2023 2015-2024
Mining Type
BASE PROBABLE POSSIBLE POTENTIAL BASE PROBABLE POSSIBLE POTENTIAL
CODELCO 7,971 0 17,130 3,036 12,817 0 13,148 2,691
Large mining - Cu 11,329 1,613 2,890 32,890 7,451 4,404 8,840 15,090
Medium mining - Cu 152 0 1,221 1,900 152 597 624 700
Gold 0 4,673 1,209 11,500 0 4,450 1,081 0
Metallurgy Plants 490 0 0 0 521 0 0 0
Iron 1,541 0 2,978 0 198 90 2,888 0
Industrial Minerals 1,948 0 380 0 0 665 883 0
Copper 19,942 1,613 21,241 37,826 20,941 5,001 22,612 18,481
Gold 0 4,673 1,209 11,500 0 4,450 1,081 0
Other14 3,489 0 3,358 0 198 755 3,771 0
14
Other = Iron and industrial minerals
On a national level, the northern zone15 is that which has seen the greatest decline in investment,
with 31.5% less than registered in the previous registry. Likewise, on a regional level, the regions
with the greatest investment declines are the region of Coquimbo (-58.8%), Tarapac (-54.2%) and
Atacama (-44.7%). However the first two decreases in investment are due to the removal of an
important project in each region (Ampliacin IV Los Pelambres and Collahuasi Fase II, respectively),
while the investment decline in the Atacama region is due to the removal of eight initiatives, which
shows the difficulties that exist in the region with respects to the materialization of projects (table
27).
Table 26: Comparison of portfolios 2015 and 2014 on a regional level
2014 - 2023 2015 2024

Region
Investment16 Part. % of Project Investment16 Part. % of Project
(MMUS$) total Quantity17 (MMUS$) total Quantity17
Arica y Parinacota 0 0.0% 0 0 0.0% 0
Tarapac 13,590 13.0% 4 6,222 8.1% 3
Antofagasta 34,607 33.0% 17 34,134 44.2% 15
Atacama 31,005 29.6% 21 17,139 22.2% 13
Coquimbo 11,900 11.3% 5 4,900 6.3% 4
Valparaso 8,220 7.8% 2 8,141 10.5% 2
Metropolitana 649 0.6% 0 504 0.7% 1
O'Higgins 4,881 4.7% 2 6,249 8.1% 2
North Zone 91,102 86.9% 47 62,395 80.7% 36
Central-South Zone 13,749 13.1% 4 14,894 19.3% 6
15
North Zone corresponds to the regions of Arica and Parinacota to Coquimbo, while the Central-South Zone corresponds
to the regions of Valparaso, Metropolitana and OHiggins.
16
Other Codelco projects are distributed in the following manner for 2014 and 2015, respectively: Antofagasta 45% - 40%,
Atacama 5% - 12.5%, Valparaso 5% - 7.5%, Metropolitana 15% - 10% and O'Higgins 30% - 30%.
17
The "Other development projects " and "Information projects" initiatives are considered as to large projects in the total
amount of the portfolio, as their investments are broken down through the whole country.
7. Conclusions
Chile, like the rest of the world, has been greatly affected by the weakening of the price of
commodities, which has made the materialization or advance of mining initiatives difficult in the
past few years. Likewise, mining has been affected by a new treatment coming from the
communities wherein the projects will be installed.
Currently the portfolio of mining projects to be carried out within the next decade consists of 41
initiatives which will allow Chile to maintain its worldwide leadership in copper production and
increase significantly the production of gold and silver, of iron, and of some industrial minerals.
The relevant elements of this portfolio are not the global value, rather the composition in terms of
the number of initiatives, who is pushing them, the objectives, where they are found, and the efforts
being made to carry them out. From the analysis of the background information shown in this report
the following can be concluded:
Investment origin
For the first time, CODELCO presents an investment portfolio almost equal to that coming from the
private copper mines, which, beyond seeking a productive increase of the state, seeks to consolidate
the sustainable development in the long term, permitting the continuity of operations for the next
30 years. This portfolio reaches US$ 28,656 million, being 43% of the copper portfolio and 37% of
the total portfolio. CODELCO possesses 61% of the investments in base condition of Chilean copper
mining.
Only some private companies in large copper mining maintain investment plans of a similar
magnitude to those of CODELCO, among which stands out Antofagasta Minerals, with the
developments in Distrito Centinela in the community of Sierra Gorda, KGHM and the expansion of
the new operation of Sierra Gorda, BHP Biliton with the expansion projects of Escondida and the
continuity of operations in Cierro Colorado and Spence, the last with a line of sulphured minerals.
Following the same example is Teck with Quebrada Blanca Hipgeno and the Relincho project in
Atacama, and Freeport McMoRan, which after the sale of their assets in Atacama put all of their
efforts in the El Abra Mill project.
The investment in other minerals18 has been diminished with respects to the previous year,
specifically with respects to the previous year, specifically to gold mining, which has fallen by 68%.
The most affected is that which development potential in the Atacama region.
The investments come from 8 countries, led by Chile, with a 58.9% of total participation, coming
from the state and private mining. In the second place is Canada with a 21% participation, with
emblematic companies such as Tech Resources, Lindin Mining, (which was just acquired by
Candelaria), Barrick Gold, and other companies focused in investments in the medium copper mines
18
Oro, hierro y minerales industriales
and of industrial minerals. With participation of less than 10% are countries such as Australia, the
United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Poland, China, and Korea.
Investment purpose
On a global level, the purpose of developing greenfield initiatives reaches a 57.7% of the portfolio
total with around 22 projects, being relevant for all of the classifications with exception of the
investments carried out by CODELCO, being mainly brownfield.
The expansion of the operations as well as that of replacing the current production are especially
relevant for CODELCO, to assure its competitive position in the long term, as well as for the
conditions of depletion in which some of the most emblematic sites are found. For the expansion
projects 9 have been identified which make up 22.9% of the total investment, whereas for the
replacement 11 projects are considered, with a 19.4% of the investment total.
Investment Region
Antofagasta remains the principal investment destination, focused principally on copper mining,
with 22.3% of the total participation in the investment portfolio. Atacama is the second investment
destination, with 22.2% of the total investment participation, and is the only zone with investments
in gold mining (32% of the regional investment) as well as a significant investment in copper (62%
of the regional investment) as well as other minerals. Valparaso, Tarapac, the Metropolitana
region, and OHiggins only have copper investments, while Coquimbo has copper investments and
a significant iron Project with copper coproduction.
Investment conditionality
All mining initiatives may be affected by certain variables which affect their planned timeframe,
which are mainly the stage of advancement in construction or of their studies, obtaining of permits,
be it environmental or legal, financial strength of the operating companies, as well as other factors.
Therefore the initiatives with the greatest probability of materializing within the timeframes
indicated by the proprietary mining companies, which corresponds to the projects in base and
probable condition, correspond to 24 initiatives valued in US$ 31,345 million dollars.
In the group of projects which are in the possible and potential categories, which correspond to
those mining investments with lesser probability of being implemented within the timeframes
defined by the owners are also those most susceptible to being affected by changes in market
conditions, wherein we find 18 initiatives valued in US$ 45.945 million.
Conversely, the projects in execution reached 27.4% of the total portfolio with 13 initiatives, while
those projects in the feasibility stage correspond to 26 initiatives wherein 62.8% of the investment
total is concentrated.
There are 17 initiatives making up 27.1% of the investment total which have the RCA approved as
of July 2015, which indicates the existence of 6 initiatives within the next few months which could
begin implementation and change their materialization condition. Likewise, 33.1% of the
investment corresponds to 11 initiatives which have not received a positive environmental
qualification resolution (RCA approved) for the projects presented, and 27.5% of the investment
corresponds to projects who have not yet entered their respective EIA into the system.
Upon annualizing the financing coming from the investment portfolio, it is possible to identify three
periods:
- Investment already received, which corresponds to US$15.380 million, or 19,9% of the
current portfolio,
- The investment to be concreted during the next five year period, 2015-2024, US$ 44,894
million, equaling 58.1% of the portfolio, with an average yearly investment of US$ 8.979
million,
- The remainder to be invested in the 2020-2024 period being those projects whose
implementation date is planned for this period, whose investment reaches US$ 16.981
million, making up 22% of the investment portfolio.
Among the investments to materialize during the next five year period, the group of projects in base
and probable condition make up 40% of the investment, with an average rate of US$ 3,592 million.
Furthermore, the group of initiatives in the possible and potential condition make up the remaining
60%, with an average yearly investment of US$ 5,386 million.
Structural change in copper production
Considering a horizon of 2026, Chile has the potential of reaching a copper production capacity of
7.56 million tons of copper, a 31.6% increase over the production registered in 2014, if all of the
planned projects are carried out according to their timeframes, the maximum production registered
within this period would be reached in 2024, wherein the copper production would reach
approximately 7.84 million tons, 36.3% over the 2014 production.
This increase in production shows a structural change in the type of final product of the copper
operations, whereas as the production capacity in concentrates were to increase by 2.84 million
tons by 2026, a 72.7% increase over 2014, the SxEw cathode production would diminish by 1.03
million tons, registering a 55.7% decrease with respects to the same year.
This decrease in SxEw cathodes is principally due to the exhaustion of leachable resources and of
the closure of operations of some copper sites towards the end of the next decade, such as
Collahuasi, Sagasca, Quebrada Blanca, Mantos Blancos, Michilla, Las Cenizas, Franke, Mantoverde
and Carmen de Andacollo. Furthermore, it is observed that some of CODELCOs operations, such as
Chuquicamata (Hidrosur), Radomiro Tomic and Salvador, will reduce their production due to the
depletion of leachable resources.
However, the increase of production coming from the concentration lines has repercussions on two
aspects of the strategic mining area, which are:
- Increase in the exportable supply of concentrates, without increasing the current
production of ER cathodes: where during 2014 2.55 million tons of copper concentrate was
exported, equaling 65.3% of the concentrate production of the country, by 2026 the
maximum copper concentrate production should reach 6.75 million tons, reaching 89% of
the national copper participation, wherein it could potentially export 5.2 million tons of
concentrate, in other words, 76.9% of the Chilean copper concentrate production.
- Increase in the levels of processing and generating of tailings: if currently 10.849 tpd of fine
copper concentrate is produce, as a produce of the processing of 1.60 mtpd of sulphured
ore, and generate around 1.56 Mtpd of tailings (2014 amounts), the copper mining project
portfolio for 2015-2024 will increase the production of fine copper concentrate to 18.741
tpd, as a product of the processing of around 3.47 Mtpd of tailings by 2026. This means an
increase in daily treatment and tailings generation of around 121% to only increase daily
copper production by 32%.
ANNEX 1: Description of investment projects in copper mining
1. Projects by the state owned copper mines

1.1. Structural Projects by CODELCO - www.codelco.cl
SULFUROS RADOMIRO TOMIC PHASE II (Divisin Radomiro Tomic)
The Radomiro Tomic Sulfuros project

corresponds to the option of continuing the
development of the RT open pit mine, whose
oxide production will fall decisively beginning
in 2018, through the exploitation of the
Sulphur estimated in 2,600 million tons, with
an average copper grade of 0.47%.
From the mining perspective this project adds
new extraction phases which take advantage
of the current development of the Radomiro
Tomic mine, generating a total material
movement of between 600,000 and 650,000
tpd, with a mineral production of 200,000 tpd.
With respects to ore processing, the project proposes the construction and operation of a new
concentrator plant with a 200,000 tpd capacity, with which it would be one of the largest SAG
concentration plants in the country. It is estimated that the project will contribute around 350
thousand tons of fine copper annually, as well as 7 thousand tons of molybdenum concentrates.
Among the most relevant aspects is the use of desalinized sea water in the processes, and beginning
in 2021, the implementation of thick tailings technology, which will allow for the optimized usage
and size of the tank, to recover more water and diminish the emissions of material particles, among
other environmental advantages.
In 2013, project finished the feasibility studies, considering reaching 200,000 tpd of processing in
two stages of 100,000 tpd each: the first in 2018 and the second in 2021. Furthermore, it advanced
in the acquiring the land and services which will be required to base the future installations on.
In May 2013, it entered into the Environmental Impact Assessment phase of the projects, and by
the end of the year was finishing the first addendum, to later obtain the sectoral permit. Currently
Codelco has responded to the second addendum of the project and the Environmental Evaluation
Service (SEA) is in the process of indigenous consulting within the framework of the Convenio 169
of the OIT.
Resources : 3,617 Mt @ 0.46% Cu
Treatment Capacity : 200 Ktpd of sulphured ore, in two stages.
Estimated Investment : MMUS$ 5,376, including the infrastructure for desalinization and
impulsion of sea water, but does not include the thick tailings plant,
to be built at a later time.
Sea water usage : Considers a desalinization plant with inverse osmosis technology
of 1,600l/s, with an estimated investment of US$ 1,500 million,
included in the total project investment.
Labor : 12,100 in the construction stage, and 2,200 in the operation stage.
Condition of materialization :
Condition Project type Stage of advance SEA permit Implementation

POSSIBLE New Feasibility EIA presented 2019
Current Status : In process of RCA approval and of sectoral permits, with time
extension requested until September 2015. Beginning of
construction estimated for the beginning of 2016, to finish stage 1
of the process by the end of 2018.
NEW LEVEL MINE (Divisin Teniente)
This development will enlarge the El Teniente mine to a deeper area

of the site, located in the 1,880 level, being 100m lower than the
current Teniente 8, adding to this a exploitable area of 2 million square
meters. This new sector contains reserves which reach 2,020 million
tons and with an average copper ore grade of 0.86% and 220ppm of
molybdenum.
The configuration of the project contemplates the exploitation
through a panel caving system, with 100% of the area preconditioned
with hydraulic fracturing and a level pattern that is typical for El
Teniente mine: sinking, production, ventilation, hauling, and crushing.
The difference is, in this case, the mineral will be transported to the
surface through a system of transportation belts to the Coln
concentrator.
The project will allow the level of divisional operation to reach sustained operations in the long term
at 137 ktpd, extending by more than 50 years the useful lifespan of the mine beginning in 2017.
Additionally it leaves the option of reaching a treatment capacity of 180 ktpd within the next decade
open.
It is estimated that between 2011 and 2017 the project will carry out 98,450 meters of tunnel work
(horizontal development) and 3,454 meters of vertical developments: ventilation ducts and transfer
shafts.
It is worth noting that the New Level Mine (Nuevo Nivel Mina) project poses an engineering design
oriented to diminishing risks. At the same time, it will greatly reduce the exposure of the workers
to dangerous situations , as it considers semi-automatic operations commanded in the control
rooms located in the valley, more than 50 kilometers from the work site.
Treatment capacity : 137 Ktpd of sulphured ores, with possibilities to expansion within
the next decade to 180 Ktpd of sulphured ores.
Estimated investment : MMUS$ 4,920
Seawater usage : Does not apply.
Labor : 3,500 workers in construction stage.

BASE Replacement Execution EIA approved 2021
Current Status : The project has passed on to a closer review, delaying the expected
implementation date and increasing the investment required for
development. The aforementioned is explained by greater
geotechnical complexity in the access and transportation. It is
expected that it will gradually start up production in 2021.
CHUQUICAMATA SUBTERRNEA (Divisin Chuquicamata)
The Corporation is currently exploring the

geological resources deep in the Chuquicamata
deposit, whose reserves are estimated at 1.650
million tons with a .71% copper grade.
The project considers the exploitation through
macro blocks, using the extraction process of
block caving, in a subterranean mine made up of
four production levels; a principal access tunnel
7.5 km long, five clean air injection ramps, two air
extraction spires, and many other features.
Likewise it foresees an increasing production rate
from 2,700 tons of ore per day at the beginning of
the operation, up unto meeting the goal of
140,000 tpd nine years later, which would mean a yearly production of 366,000 tons of fine copper
and 18,000 tons of fine molybdenum.
The development would coincide with the end of the useful life of the put and would send the
minerals to the current concentrators of Chuquicamata.
Treatment Capacity : Up to 140 Ktpd of sulphured mineral.
Labor : 3,767 in the construction phase and a maximum of 4,837 in the
operational phase, once Operations reach their peak.

Current status : The first stages have been completed, currently carrying out access
tunnel and transportation tasks. A gradual development of the
mine is planned, with production to commence in 2020.
NUEVA ANDINA: PHASE II - EXPANSIN A 244 KTPD / (Divisin Andina)
This structural project by Codelco consists in the treatment capacity expansion of the Division
Andina by 150 ktpd of mineral, passing from the 94 ktpd reached in the PDA phase 1 to 244 ktpd
nominal capacity. The prior is translated for the first 30 years of operation, in an additional 343 ktpa
of fine copper, which would take the Division Andina to be producing around 600 ktpa of fine copper
and would extend the useful lifespan of the Division until 2085. The construction or the Expansin
Andina will take 6 years due its complexity and the need to build a mineral transport system through
tunnels in the high mountains.
The expansion considers new unitary operations of primary crushing, mineral transportation,
secondary and third crushing, collective, selective and molybdenum recovery flotation plants, as
well as a filtering plant with concentrate storage, for later transportation and storage in the
Quintero Bay. Among the necessary equipment, this project will include the use of HGPR technology
(High Pressure Grinding Roll), in the third crushing stage, with which it is hoped to lower operation
costs, by around 20%, a savings which is strongly sustained by a lower specific consumption of
energy, around 25%.
For these operations, the project includes work in the Valparaso region, expansion of the pit mine
and mining infrastructure, of the mineral transportation system, new concentration plant and
copper concentrate storage in the Bay of Quintero, as well as in the Metropolitan region the
expansion of the Ovejera tailings tank (currently in operations), a new canal for the transportation
of tailings, a water recirculation system from the tank, electrical transmission lines of 22kV and 33kV,
a concentration duct and a filtering plant in the Montenegro area.

Treatment Capacity : 150 ktpd of sulphured mineral above the current 94 ktpd.
Seawater usage : Not considered.
Labor : Between 12,800 and 18,000 workers in the construction stage,
and approximately 2,043 average in the operational stage.

POSSIBLE Expansion Feasibility EIA presented 2024
Current status : The feasibility Assessment finalized in 2013 modified the project
timeline, defining the implementation for not before 2023.
Production is estimated to begin in 2024.
NUEVO TRASPASO RAJO - PLANTA / (Divisin Andina)
The New Primary Crushing System consists in the construction of a new crushing line, which will
allow the current production capacity of Divisin Andina to be maintained, with around 92 thousand
tons of mineral per day, generating around 240 thousand tons of fine copper per year, as well as 3.9
tons of molybdenum production.
In accordance with the mining plans and the advance, the current feeding lines for the Don Luis
crusher will be affected by the pit growth. Therefore the Divisin Andina will require the
replacement of the infrastructure which guarantees the mineral processing capacity, fitting a new
space wherein a new crushing line will be installed which allows the transfer of mineral from the
mine to the plant.
The work contemplates the construction of a platform in the 3.500 Nodo, an avalanche protection
system, the construction of a new primary crusher, the construction of the Haulage III belt tunnel,
the SAG hopper distribution and feeding system, and a new secondary crushing plant. This will allow
the useful life of the pit to be extended until 2033 and allow the development of the Nueva Andina
Fase II.
Another of the most appealing innovations of this projects consists in the installation of an
avalanche control system which will allow to guard all of the installations contemplated in the area,
and of course, the personnel who work there.
Resources : Does not apply.
Treatment Capacity : Does not apply.
Labor : This project does not modify the numbers of the Divisin Andina.

BASE Replacement Execution N/A 2022
Current status : The project is in the investment execution stage, as initiated in mid-
2013. The construction of all of the parts of the project will take 8
years due to the climatic conditions which impede surface work
during the winter months, being completely operational not before
2022.
RAJO INCA/ (Divisin Salvador)

The Rajo Inca consists in an operational continuity project of the current installations of the El
Salvador Division of CODELCO, through the open pit exploitation of the Indio Muerto deposit. This
project, as well as extending the useful life of Salvador for more than 30 years from the closure of
the subterranean mine, contemplates the expansion of the current treatment capacity of the
Division from 2022, reaching a total of 132 ktpd in 2023.
The current mining plan of the Salvador Division contemplates the usage of the sulphured resources
form the Inca area through subterranean mining which will be interrupted in 2018 because of the
pre-stripping work having begun for the Rajo Inca project. Furthermore the area called
Campamento Antiguo will exhaust its reserves in 2017.
The pre-feasibility API of the Rajo Inca project has been turned in for review. This prefeasibility
Assessment contemplates flexibility in the design and extraction sequence of the Rajo Inca project,
being subject to controlling with a greater level of certainty in the tonnage and ore grade feeding
the plant due to the high percentage of broken mineral contemplated in the operation and to
reevaluate the development strategy of the mining business, analyzing the possibility of a smaller
entrance to the Rajo Inca to thereby speed up the implementation date.
It is to be noted that the Corporation contemplates analyzing the feasibilty of processing marginal
resources (run of mine process) with the purpose of using the Sx-Ew assets of Salvador during the
transition period of the Rajo Inca, a project which could supply, beginning in 2017, leachable
resources of a low ore grade.
Resources : 1,291 Mt @ 0.45% Cu.
Treatment Capacity : 132 Ktpd.
Labor : Not available

POTENTIAL New Pre-Feasibility Without EIA 2020
Current status : Project in pre-feasibility stage. Implementation projected not

before 2020.
2. Large private copper mining projects

2.1. Projects of Anglo American - www.angloamerican.com
LOS BRONCSE FASE 7 (Anglo American Sur S.A.)
The Los Bronces operation considers prioritizing the use of the mineral in those sectors with the best geological
information and lowest ore burden, to be able to maintain the current production levels. In this sense, the project
incorporates a modification of the mining usage denominated Fase 7 of mining development. The extension of
Fase 7 contemplates an estimated 44 hectare surface, which currently is used and occupied for service
infrastructure of the mining operations. From the productive point of view, it is projected to extract a total of
approximately 78 million tons of material, of which 42 million tons correspond to tailings and 36 tons of mineral.
As a result of the prior information, it is necessary to reposition the infrastructure which will be affected by the
mining development, which will bring with it the construction, fitting and relocation of buildings and other
operational service infrastructure.
Given the fact that the project has the objective of sustaining the current production levels, without incorporating
modifications in the mineral treatment capacity of the plants, an increase in water consumption and inputs is nor
projected which would pass the authorized levels of the Desarollo Los Bronces project. In this same sense, to
carry out the project will not require new mineral processing plant infrastructure, modification of the pulp
transportation system, nor of the tailings tanks.
Resources : XXXXXXXX
Treatment Capacity : 160 ktpd average, with a maximum of 180 ktpd.
Estimated investment : MMUS$ 112
Labor : 120 in the construction phase.

PROBABLE Expansion Feasibility EIA presented 2017
Current status: Project entered to the SEA through a DIA in November of 2014, waiting for environmental
approval.
2.2. Antofagasta Minerals Projects - www.antofagasta.co.uk
ANTUCOYA (Minera Antucoya Ltda.)
A deposit located at 125 km to the northeast of Antofagasta and at 45 km in a straight line from the coast, which
contains proved and probable reserves of 635.8 million tons with 0.35% copper (with a cut-off grade of 0.21% Cu).
The project will produce an average of 85,000 tons of copper cathodes during the first 10 years of operation, to
later reach an average of 80,000 tons of cathodes per year until completing the 20 years of useful life that is
estimated for the project.
Antucoya will be developed as a conventional open cast mine and the mineral will be processed through dynamic
leaching pits and a SXEW plant, using untreated seawater in the operations. Although it is a greenfield type project
of low grade, there are a series of compensable factors; the deposit is relatively shallow and therefore the process
of pre-stripping to eliminate the 35 million tons of waste is only expected to take nine months; the sterile/mineral
relationship is also low, approximately 1:1; the deposit is located within a well-developed mining zone, which
permits easy access to pre-existing infrastructure, including energy, water, and human resources.
Toward the end of December of 2012, the development of Antucoya was suspended to allow for a review of the
project due to an increase in the current and potential costs. After the positive adaptations, the construction of
the project was reactivated in the second trimester of 2013, eliminating the acids plant considered in the initial
project, and increasing the average production for the first 10 years.
Resources : 1,208.5 Mt @ 0.30% Cu (measured, indicated, and inferred)
Treatment Capacity : High grade mineral, up to 96 ktpd; ROM (Run of Mine) mineral, up to 38 ktpd.
Labor : Between 5,000 and 7,000 in the construction phase, and 1,400 in the operation
stage.
Seawater usage : Provided through an impulsion system from Esperanza.

BASE New Execution EIA approved 2015
Current status: Project with construction finalized. A production amount of 37,000 TMF of cathodes is
expected in 2015.
ESPERANZA UPDATE (Minera Centinela, ex Minera Esperanza)
The Esperanza mine, located 30 km from the area of Sierra Gorda, Antofagasta region, has begun an optimization
process through two environmental impact declarations (DIA) presented in 2013.
The first optimization, called Tercera Actualizacin Proyecto Esperanza, with the DIA approved in May 2012,
seeks to increase the availability of critical inputs (water, inhibitors and process reactive, etc.), incorporating new
oxidized minerals resources in areas to later be used as dumps, and the construction of a new molybdenum
processing plant.
In this first optimization, the Planta de Molibdeno project represents the task with the greatest reach. The
location of the plant is in a sector close to the collective flotation, in the Esperanza sector next to the existing
concentrator plant. The process corresponds to a standard selective flotation circuit with a treatment rate of 5.5
Ktpd, with the following stages: primary flotation, cleaning flotation, filtering, drying and storage of the
Molybdenum concentrate produced. The end, or tailing of the process corresponds to the copper-ore
concentrate which will continue its processing in the current concentration plant.
The second optimization, denominated Cuarta Actualizacin del Proyecto Esperanza -Optimizacin del Proceso,
with a DIA presented in June of 2013, concentrates on the improvement of the current crushing and floating
systems, with the incorporation of a secondary and tertiary crushing plant as a complement of the current
processing capacity, as well as another concentrate thickener and another of tailings.
Once these improvements are concreted, Esperanza will have increased the treatment capacity of the
concentration plant of 12 ktpd, reaching 105 Ktpd to be treated. This increase is translated into approximately 19
Ktpa of Cu concentrate added to the current production of the operation. Furthermore, the molybdenum plant
will allow the company to produce around 2 ktpa of Mo during the useful life of the current operation,
substantially increasing the value chain.
Of these two initiatives, Optimizacin del Proceso is the most advanced, estimating that the increase in the
output of the plant to 105 Ktpd will be complete by the end of 2015. During 2013 the projects activities were
focused on the installation of the two additional tailings thickeners.
With respects to the construction of the molybdenum plant, Esperanza will continue evaluating the project, which
is currently in the feasibility Assessment phase. However, if it is approved, production could begin in 2016.
It is to be noted that due to the restructuring of the Distrito Centinela projects, Esperanza Sur was added to the
mining plan of Esperanza, increasing the operational reserves from 731.6 Mt with ore grades of 0.50% in copper,
0.011% of molybdenum, and 0.19 gpt of gold to 1,789.2 Mt with ore grades of 0.45% in copper, 0.013% of
molybdenum, and 0.16 gpt of gold. This would increase the useful lifespan of the current operations in Esperanza
by an additional 30 years.
Resources : 3,244.7 Mt @ 0.38% Cu; 0.005% Mo; 0.12 gpt Au (measured, indicated and
inferred)
Treatment Capacity : 12 ktpd of additional sulphured mineral over current capacity, plus 5.5 ktpd of
treatment in the molybdenum plant.
Estimated investment : MM US$ 630 (Tercera Actualizacin Proyecto Esperanza MMUS$ 200; Cuarta
Actualizacin del Proyecto Esperanza -Optimizacin del Proceso MMUS$ 430).
Seawater usage : Will be maintained from the current plant.
Labor : 875 workers in the construction phase and 49 in the operational phase.

BASE Expansion Execution EIA approved 2015
Current status : Projects with feasibility studies in already in processing and in construction,
respectively. The project called Tercera Actualizacin Proyecto Esperanza has
the DIA approved as of May 2012, but is still being evaluated, with the
implementation budgeted for 2016, on the other hand the Cuarta Actualizacin
del Proyecto Esperanza -Optimizacin del Proceso, which has the DIA approved
since November 2013 is estimated to be working by the end of 2015.
MODIFICACIONES EL TESORO (Minera Centinela, ex Minera Tesoro)
The El Tesoro mine, located 25 km to the east of the area of Sierra Gorda, Antofagasta region, and with an altitude
of approximately 2,300 meters above sea level, in January of 2014 presented the DIA Continuidad operacional:
Aumento de capacidad de procesamiento y modificacin Planta SX.
This project has the principal objective of maintaining the production of fine copper cathodes from El Tesoro,
equivalent to 110 ktpa. This will be possible, by providing the maximum benefit of their own resources, and also
by processing the copper-rich solutions provided by third parties. The project is centered on four points in
particular:
i. Increasing the processing capacity: Consists of crushing, agglomeration, and leaching of 2,500,000 tons of
minerals, preferably stick, but eventually directly from one of more of the pits being mined in the site, in a
new comminution, agglomeration, and leaching plant. This increased processing capacity will allow for the
partial compensation for the decrease in the ore grade of the minerals being processed.
ii. Gravel leaching: generated from minerals previously leached in a dynamic pit, but which for their remaining
copper content are profitable to reprocess (re-leaching) within the same pit as the existing gravel. It will be
benefitted by 3,000,000 tons yearly during the rest of the useful lifespan of El Tesoro.
iii. Modification of the SX Plant and processing of solutions from third parties: in this case, the SX plant will
require modification, with the objective of allowing it to process solutions, in the short term, from the
Encuentro xidos project, and in the long term, from other oxide deposits which may exist in the area.
iv. Carrying out drilling surveys: through diamond drilling and reverse airflow, in an area that was previously
explored within the mining properties of the current operation, specifically the area known as Llano-
Paleocanal, located directly south and southeast of the Tesoro Noreste pit.
In the end of July of 2014, the project was approved by the SEA, with which the carrying out of the project
should have started in the end of August 2014.
Resources : 346 Mt @ 0.45% Cu
Treatment Capacity : 7 ktpd of oxide minerals added to the current capacity.
Seawater usage : The supply will be maintained from Esperanza

Labor : 460 workers in the construction stage and 270 in the operation stage.

Current status : Projects with feasibility studies in progress and DIA approved in July of 2014.
Beginning construction at the end of August of 2014, it is projected that the
implementation will be in the middle of 2016.
ENCUENTRO, (Antofagasta Minerals S.A.)
The Encuentro deposit is located about 10 km to the SE of Esperanza and the immediate strategy is to develop
the oxide layer in the beginning, which would be the pre-stripping for the sulphured stage, to be developed in the
second stage. The development of these usage lines is linked to the Minera Cetinela operations.
i. Encuentro xidos:
The Encuentro xidos deposit is expected to produce around 50,000 tons of copper cathodes per year, using the
existing capacity of El Tesoro. This initiative will permit the current Sx-Ew plant to keep producing to its full
capacity, (100,00 tons per year), beginning in 2016, for around 8 years, helping to compensate the diminishing of
the productive production of the decline in ore grades of the current deposit from where the mineral is being
extracted.
This project contemplates new crushing and heap leaching installations, with a tube which will direct the leaching
solution or PLS (Pregnant Leach Solution) to the EL Tesoro plant about 15 km away, for processing. The mineral
with the highest ore grades will be crushed and sent to the new heap leaching installations, while the minerals
with the lesser grades will be processed in a ROM leaching heap.
The feasibility Assessment should be finished during the first semester of 2014, to later begin with the pre-
stripping in the end of 2014, for a period of two years, followed by primary production in 2016.
Currently the Group is analyzing ways to reduce the investment costs, including considering the importation of
equipment of China, and the use of a project team lead by Antofagasta Minerals instead of the EPCM contractor.
Resources : 178.8 Mt @ 0.44% Cu (measured, indicated and inferred)
Treatment Capacity : Between high grade mineral and ROM, around 65 Ktpd.
Seawater usage : Coming from Esperanza through impulsion system.
Labor : 2,000 workers in the construction stage and 500 in the operation stage.

Current status : Project construction begun in the end of 2014 with implementation estimated
for 2016.
ii. Encuentro Sulfuros (Desarrollo Distrito Centinela):
Minera Centinela registered in the Environmental Evaluation System (SEA) of the Antofagasta Region the
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in May of 2015.
It is expected that in the first stage, which will be implemented in 2019, the project will allow 140 thousand tons
of fine copper to be added. With the second stage, in 2024, another 60 thousand tons will be added. Therefore,
in the next decade, Minera Centinela will reach a yearly production greater than 400 thousand tons.
The initiative contemplates carrying the project out in two stages. The first corresponds to the development of
the Esperanza Sur deposit, which has estimated plan to enter in operations by 2019, and would mean the
investment of US$ 2,700 million. Furthermore the second stage consists in the development of the Encuentro
Slfuros deposit, whose operational date is projected for 2024, wherein an investment of an additional US$ 1,650
million will be made.
Resources : 1,193.5 Mt @ 0.40% Cu; 0.014% Mo; 0.16 gpt Au (measured, indicated and
inferred)
Treatment Capacity : 95 Ktpd of sulphured mineral.
Seawater usage : Coming from Esperanza through an impulsion system.
Labor : No information available.

POSSIBLE New Feasibility EIA Presented 2019
Current status : Project entered into the environmental evaluation system in May 2015.
LOS PELAMBRES (Minera Los Pelambres S.A.)
The Los Pelambres deposit is located almost 170 km to the east of Los Vilos, and at 3,100 meters above sea level.
It has basic resources which surpass by more than four times the mineral reserves in the current operation.
Therefore the Company has continued to examine options for the long-term development of the mine, designing
distinct alternatives for growth. Therefore, during 2013, the Group has completed the pre-feasibility studies
which examines the options for the progressive and improved long term expansions through the current operation
of Los Pelambres.
AMPLIACIN MARGINAL LOS PELAMBRES
This expansion does not require new infrastructure and only seeks to increase by 15% the current treatment
capacity of the concentrating plant through optimizing the productive process.
During November a feasibility Assessment was begun over the marginal expansion, with a possible first production
beginning in 2018. Currently it is expected that the yield could increase to close to 205 ktpd. Likewise, it would
modify the current processing plant to be able to treat harder minerals, which is expected for the following stages
in the mining plan. These combined factors will support a net increase in the average production from
approximately 40 ktpa to 45 ktpa of fine copper.
Resources : 5,714 Mt @ 0.52% Cu; 0.016% Mo; 0.05 gpt Au
Treatment Capacity : Additional 30 ktpd of sulphured ores.
Seawater usage : Not considered in the project.
Labor : No information available.
Condition Project Type Stage of advance SEA permit Implementation

POSSIBLE Replacement Feasibility Without EIA 2018
Current status : Project with feasibility Assessment being processed, and it is hoped that the EIA
of the project may be sent during the second semester of 2015. The company
estimates that the implementation would be during 2018.
2.3. BHP Billiton Projects - www.bhpbilliton.com
SPENCE GROWTH PROJECT or MINERALES PRIMARIOS SPENCE (Minera Spence S.A.)
For the benefit of the primary sulphured minerals, the site considers the implementation of a concentration plant
with a nominal treatment capacity of between 95,000 and 100,000 tons of mineral. Also, the processing of the
mineral reserves will allow the useful lifespan of the site to be extended by around 20 years, producing around
835,000 tons of copper concentrate and 7,500 tons of molybdenum concentrate yearly.
It is to be noted that the current operations of Minera Spence (consists in the usage of supergene material,
leaching of sulphide and oxides, solvent extraction and electro-winning to produce high purity copper cathodes)
will continue being carried out at the same time until 2024.
The project also considers the use of desalinized salt water of industrial quality as a supply, for which the
construction and operation of a desalinization plant with a production capacity of up to 1,600 l/s, which will be
located approximately 12 km to the Northeast of the town of Mejillones. This plant would be built in two stages,
with the materialization of the work to produce and operate the 800 l/s required for the mining project, and the
second stage of 800 l/s to supply other BHP Billiton projects.
Resources : No information
Treatment Capacity : New concentration plant with capacity between 95,000 and 100,000 tpd.
Estimated investment : MMUS$ 3,300 (includes US$ 800 million for desalinization plant)
Seawater usage :Use of desalinized sea water with an 800 l/s capacity plant, with possibility to
expand to 1,600 l/s.
Labor : For the site between 1,550 and 4,100 workers are considered for construction,
and 220 for operation. For the desalinization plant around 1,380 in construction
and between 26 and 45 for operation.

Current status : Project in feasibility stage, with approval process from the EIA presented in July
of 2015. If the EIA is approved, the operation could continue development
beginning in 2019.
ESCONDIDA ORGANIC GROWTH PROJECT I (Minera Escondida Ltda.)
BHP reformulated the original Escondida Fase V

project in 2011, for a new model of organic
growth, which is initiated with the addition of a
mill in the Laguna Seca plant, increasing the
treatment capacity of this plant by 15 Ktpd, and
later the construction of a new concentrating
plant with 152 Ktpd of mineral treatment which
would replace the current Los Colorados plant,
which will be dismantled to leave the area in
conditions to remove the rich minerals which are
lying in the location of the plant.
Furthermore, the company has plans for the medium/long term to carry out a new phase called OGP II, which
includes adding a third plant to the productive cycle, as well as the infrastructure related to the electrical hanging
of the operation. This last initiative is currently only in the profile engineering level.
Resources : 13,890 Mt @ 0.57% Cu (measured, indicated, and inferred)
Treatment Capacity : Net increase of 47 ktpd of sulphured minerals: a) an additional 15 ktpd of Sulphur
minerals in the Laguna Seca plant, to reach 135 ktpd. B) Removal of the current
Los Colorados plant at 120 ktpd. And c) adding a new concentrating plant for 152
ktpd.
Seawater usage : Use of desalinized sea water coming from the current Coloso Plant. However the
company will be carrying out the studies necessary for a new desalinization plant,
which will boost the current one.
Labor : Between 5,900 and 8,570 workers in the construction phase, and 739 in the
operational phase.

Current status : Project finalized in June of 2015, currently in the commissioning stage, with
definitive implementation during the third trimester of 2015.
CERRO COLORADO CONTINUIDAD OPERACIONAL (Pampa Norte S.A.)
Cerro Colorado, is a copper strip mining operation which produces SXEW cathodes and is located 120 km to the
east of Iquique, between the communities of Pozo Almonte and Pica in the region of Tarapac. It has been
operation since 1994, and Cerro Colorado has a useful lifespan estimated until 2016, for the reserves considered
in the original project as well as for the water extraction permits which it has obtained for its processes.
In July of 2013 Pampa Norte S.A., affiliate of BHP Billiton in Chile, presented the project named Continuidad
Operacional which considers continuing the current operation, tapping the mineral reserves which have been
identified and economically evaluated within the framework of distinct prospection campaigns designed to
prolong the useful lifespan of the operation. The usage of these reserves would permit the company to extend
the current operation until 2023, without modification of the process, and maintaining the currently authorized
production level, at a pace of material movement (tailings and mineral) of around 217 ktpd, as a daily average,
with a maximum of around 261 ktpd during 2016.
It is to be noted that the project considers maintaining the same water extraction rate 150 l/sfrom the field
of wells located in Pampa Lagunillas.
During July of 2015 the company delivered to the environmental authorities a third Addendum, in which it
replied to a new round of concerns from the public service sector with competence for the evaluation. It is
hoped that after the presentation of the document, the project may be voted upon, and eventually approved.
Resources : 267 Mt @ 0.60% CuT; 0.42% CuS

Treatment Capacity : Not available
Seawater usage : No used
Labor : Between 40 and 50 workers in the construction phase, and 3,200 workers on
average during the operation phase.

PROBABLE Replacement Feasibility EIA presented 2017
Current status : Project in feasibility, with EIA approval process presented in July of 2013. If this
EIA is approved, the operation could continue development beginning in 2017.
2.4. Proyecto de Capstone Mining - www.capstonemining.com
SANTO DOMINGO (Minera Santo Domingo)
Santo Domingo is the main deposit of four IOCG type deposits which Capstone Mining is assessing in the Diego de
Almagro district, a company which it received in the acquisition of Far West Mining in June 2011. A prefeasibility
Assessment was done in August 2011 wherein the investment and project operation parameters were re-
estimated.
With the available information it is postulated that usage of the sulphur resources be used to recover over 100
ktpa fine Cu and 470 kg in gold from the copper concentrates, as well as the coproduction of some 4Mtpa of iron
resources (magnetite and hematite) in Fe concentrates through the magnetic concentration of the tailings from
floatation.
The copper concentrate will be filtered and later transported from the Mine-Plant Area in trucks to the Port area
for storage and then shipping. On the other hand, the magnetite concentrate will be transported by a
concentration duct to the Port Area, where it will be washed, filtered, and stored until shipping.
Once the decision has been made to build the project, implementation should take place approximately 3 years
later. The total budget of Santo Domingo for 2014 is US$ 29.8 million to continue the engineering tasks and for
obtaining permits.
Resources : 581 Mt @ 0.32% Cu; 0.042 gpt Au (indicated and inferred)
Treatment Capacity : 70 ktpd of sulphur mineral during the first 5 years, the will remain stable at
63.5 ktpd of sulphur ores.
Seawater usage : Considers a plant which will produce 12.5 l/s of desalinized water (2.5 l/s for
concentrate washing and worker consumption, and 10 l/s for storage for the
usage of the community of Diego de Almagro). Also, it considers a water impulsion
pipeline for seawater of 112 km with a nominal flowrate of 389 l/s.
Labor : Between 1,550 and 4,060 workers in the construction phase, and 1,055 for the
operation.

PROBABLE New Feasibility EIA approved 2018
Current status : Approval of RCA in July of 2015. It is hoped that the work may commence in the
end of 2015 and the implementation to begin in 2018.
2.5. Lunding Mining Projects - www.lundinmining.com
CANDELARIA 2030 (Ca. Contractual Minera Candelaria)
The Candelariamine is located 20 km to the southeast of the city of Copiap, and 5 km to the south of Tierra
Amarilla, in the Atacama region. It began operating in 1995, and has a useful lifespan estimated until 2017, based
on the initial reserves considered in the original project.
The Candelaria 2030 project, entered into the SEA in September of 2013, considers the extension of the useful
lifespan of the current operation until 2030. This project requires diverse activities, among which is the expansion
of existing projects and the incorporation of some larger projects:
a) Increase the useful life until 2030 of the open pit and subterranean mines; deposits of the North and
Nantoco areas; processing plant, Port-Warehouse and Warehouse Candelaria aqueduct, water supply;
electrical energy supply and distribution, and desalinization plant.
b) The extension of the useful lifespan from 2017 to 2019 of the current tailings deposit called Candelaria,
and from 2023 to 2030 to the port installations in Puerto Punta Padrones. Also a new tailings deposit
called Los Diques will be made, with an approximate capacity of 600 Mt.
c) Increase in the storage capacity of the North and Nantoco dumps, by approximately 610 and 140 Mt
additionally, respectively.
Treatment Capacity : Between 9.8 ktpd and 24.2 ktpd additional of sulphur ores (65.8 ktpd currently)
Seawater usage : New aqueduct of 500 l/s, parallel to the one in existence and with the same
characteristics, which will provide desalinized water for the operation.
Labor : 970 on average and 1,700 maximum during the construction phase, and 2,600
average in the operational phase (1,200 of our own workers and 1,400
contractors).

PROBABLE Replacement Feasibility EIA approved 2018
Current status : In feasibility, with the EIA presented in September of 2014, and waiting for
approval. In July of 2015 the SEA approved the EIA of the project, for which it is
now waiting for the new owner to define the construction date of the same.
EL ABRA MILL PROJECT (Ca. Contractual Minera El Abra)
This project responds to the necessity of the company to maintain the operational continuity of the deposit to
treat the new reserves of primary sulphide which emerge as the leachable resources are exhausted. Even though
it was conceived during the past decade, it was deferred to permit that the hydrometallurgical process be
prolonged through the Sulfolix project, which is currently in operation. In July of 2010 the prefeasibility stage
began for the construction of a new concentrating plant.
This new plant aims to process between 150 and 200 ktpd, which would allow for a production of close to 300,000
tons of fine copper concentrates, doubling the current production of copper in cathodes. The last updates of the
company indicate that, thanks to the results of an exploratory campaign carried out in 2012, the El Abra Mill
Project will have the potential to produce more than 450,000 tons of copper in concentrates.
The company continues advancing in the feasibility Assessment of the project, with the purpose of evaluating in
the best way the potential of a crushing operation on a large scale and achieve greater recovery. Also it has not
discarded the existence of synergies with neighboring projects, especially with respects to obtaining water for the
project.
Treatment Capacity : Between 150 ktpd and 200 ktpd of sulphide minerals.
Seawater usage : A desalinization and water impulsion project is considered, very much like the RT
Sulfuros Fase II project.
Labor : Not available.

POTENTIAL New Feasibility With EIA 2021(e)
(e) = estimated
Current status : The company indicates that the advances of this project will depend on the
technical studies, economic factors, and conditions of the world market. Due to
the slow advance of the studies phase of this project, Cochilco estimates a delay
in the implementation date defined in the previous report, wherein the project
should be entering into operations not before 2021.
2.6. KGHM International Projects - www.sgscm.cl
SIERRA GORDA FASE 2 (Sierra Gorda SCM)
The mining deposit is close to the Spence and Tesoro Projects, (140 km East of Antofagasta) and is being developed
as a joint venture between KGHM International (55%) and Sumitomo (45%). Currently the operation processes
110 ktpd of minerals with copper, gold, and molybdenum content, which gives it perspectives to produce a yearly
average of 150 ktpa of fine copper in concentrates, 62 koz of gold, and 11 ktpa of molybdenum during the next
20 years. The expansion project announced in August 2015 plans to increase this production capacity, with 35
kTMF of electro-winning cathodes from 2017 coming from the pre-stripping of sulphides from the area and an
increase of up to an additional 110 ktpd of concentrate processing beginning in 2019. This expansion would allow
the KGHM group to reach over 300 thousand tons of copper production until the beginning of the next decade.
Resources : 1,642.9Mt @ 0.32% Cu; 0.011% Mo; 0.035 gpt Au (measured, indicated and
inferred)
Treatment Capacity : 110 ktpd of additional sulphur mineral over the current 110 ktpd.
Seawater usage : The current operation includes a seawater impulsion system with an intake from
the effluent of the cooling system from the Mejillones thermoelectric center. The
range of seawater is 1,315 l/s and of desalinized water of 63 l/s, and the impulsion
tube is 142 km.
Labor : No information.

2017(oxides) and
PROBABLE Expansion Feasibility EIA presented
2019 (sulphides)
Current status : Project entered into the environmental impact evaluation system in August of
2015, with a possible implementation date of the beginning of 2017 for the oxides
line and beginning of 2019 for the expansion of the sulphide line.
2.7. Teck Projects - www.teck.com
ACTUALIZACIN QUEBRADA BLANCA
The mining site of Quebrada Blanca in an operation which takes advantage of and benefits from a copper deposit
located in the Tarapac region, on the western edge of the Chilean highlands, at approximately 4,300 meters
above sea level. The mineral is extracted from an open pit and processed in piles and leaching pits and
conventional solvent extraction plants and through electro-winning. The product is cathodes of copper of high
purity which are transported in trucks to the Iquique ports and to other national destinations.
The copper mineral extracted from the mine is divided into two types, high ore grade and low ore grade minerals.
The high grade mineral is subjected to successive crushing stages to reduce the size and then is transported to a
belt system to the agglomeration stage to be later deposited into leaching piles.
Currently, the site presents tasks, activities or parts which show some degree of deviation from the information
presented to the environmental regulatory controllers, which has been defined as an Update Modification. This
modifications refer principally to: the expansion of the put and of the sterile pit in the south, the enlargement and
modification of the site of the leaching dumps and of gravel, the incorporation of a hipogene collection, the update
of the original camp and of the treatment of waste water, the updating of the hydrological recharging and the
incorporation of a water management area. These modifications have not changed the totality of the mining
process described previously and have been maintained within the upper basin of Quebrada Blanca, a historical
zone associated with this mining development, without affecting during normal operations the new zones in
neighboring basins.
Resources : No information
Treatment Capacity : Will not be modified
Seawater usage : Not considered

Labor : Between 223 and 256 during construction, 564 for operation and between 728
and 1,300 for closing.

PROBABLE Replacement Feasibility EIA presented 2016
Current status : Project entered into the SEA in July of 2014 with ICSARA delivered in May of
2015.
QUEBRADA BLANCA FASE 2 (Minera Quebrada Blanca)
A hypogene deposit of primary sulphides which is found underneath a supergene deposit of secondary sulphides
which is currently being developed through leaching, obtaining around 80 ktpa of SXEW cathodes. The
development of this deposit will be carried out coinciding with the depletion of the economic leachable reserves
and will allow the useful lifespan to be extended by another 39 years.
A concentrating plant is considered of 135 ktpd, which will be supplied with desalinized seawater. This capacity
will allow for the recovery of 200 ktpa of fine Cu in concentrates and 5.2 ktpa of fine Mo in molybdenum
concentrates.
In October of 2012 the company withdrew the EIA entered into the SEA with the purpose of perfecting it and to
re-present it not before the second trimester of 2013, a situation which was modified at the beginning of 2015,
wherein the company indicated that the timeframe for the re-presentation of the Environmental Impact and
Social Assessment of the Hypogene project would depend in a way on the progress of the updating process for
the existing Quebrada Blanca operation and the improvement activities of the project coming from the EIA of the
Actualizacin proyecto minero Quebrada Blanca project (see prior entry). Also, the company is currently
carrying out improvements to the feasibility Assessment with the purpose of substantially reducing the capital
expenses of the project.
Resources : 2,561.9 Mt @ 0.41 % Cu; 0.014% Mo (measured, indicated and inferred)
Treatment Capacity : 135 ktpd of sulphur mineral.
Seawater usage : Considers a desalinization plant with a water intake from the Punta Patache Port.
The impulsion system is made of a 170 km pipeline with an estimated flow rate of
1,300 l/s.
Labor : 7,000 on average y 9,200 as a maximum in the construction phase and 1,787 on
average and 2,053 as a maximum in the operational stage.

POTENTIAL New Feasibility Without EIA 2020
Current status : Project with the feasibility Assessment in optimization of the capital costs. The
Environmental Impact Assessment is in the process of being updated, due to the
company being in the process of obtaining permits for the existing installations.
The immediate expectations of the Company indicated that the EIA of the
Hypogene project will not be presented again before the end of 2015. Based on
this, the construction could being in mid-2017 with implementation for 2020.
RELINCHO (Minera Relincho)
A copper and molybdenum deposit located 50 km to the north of Vallenar, acquired by Tech with the purpose of
carrying out this old project, for which the exploration tasks have been taken up again.
According to the project feasibility Assessment, it would be a copper operation with a concentrator with a 173
ktpd capacity, to produce up to 228 ktpa of copper in concentrates and around 5.3 ktpa of fine Mo, for 21 years
of operations. As with the Quebrada Blanca Hipgeno project, it would operate completely using desalinized
seawater.
The feasibility Assessment was completed in the fourth trimester of 2013, coming to the conclusion that the
development of a 173 ktpd concentrator and the associated installations would cost approximately MMUS$ 4,500,
for an estimated useful lifespan of 21 years, based on the existing mineral reserves. The project would produce
228 ktpa of copper concentrates and 5,300 tons of molybdenum during the first 6 years of operations, to then
produce an average of 207 ktpa of copper concentrate and 5,100 tons of molybdenum for the rest of the useful
lifespan of the project.
Given the current economic conditions, the Company does not foresee significant activities for the Relincho
project during 2014, having the main objective of working on the optimization studies of feasibility which will be
centered on capital and operational cost reductions, exploring other forms of improving the value of the project.
Resources : 1,007.8 Mt @ 0.36 % Cu; 0.012% Mo (measured, indicated and inferred)
Estimated investment : MMUS$ 4,500 (according to last feasibility Assessment)
Seawater usage : Considers a desalinization plant of 700 l/s to supply the project.
Labor : No information available

POTENTIAL New Feasibility Without EIA 2022(e)
(e) = estimate
Current status : Project with the feasibility Assessment finished in 2014. During 2015 the project
optimization studies will be continued. This scenario will delay the normal
development of the project, for which Cochilco delays the implementation
projection by a year with respects to the projection from the 2014 report, now
being estimated for 2022.
3. Projects of medium copper mining
3.1. Amerigo Resources Project - www.amerigoresources.com
VALLE CENTRAL EXPANSIN (Minera Valle Central S.A.)
Minera Valle Central is located 8 kilometers east of the city of Rancagua and 90 km south of Santiago, 700 meters
above sea level. Tis operation currently treats approximately 45 Ktpd of the tailings extracted from the Colihues
reservoir and 135 Ktpd of fresh tailings which are sent daily from the Division El Teniente.
In January of 2013, Minera Valle Central presented an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to increase the
benefit capacity by increasing the extraction and processing capacity of old tailings from the current 45 Ktpd to
85 Ktpd through the incorporation of the resources of the Cauquenes Tranque for feeding into the tailings
processing plant.
In April of 2014 the project feasibility Assessment was finished, wherein the extension of the operations of Valle
Central is confirmed until 2037.
Resources : 338.14 Mt @ 0.27 % Cu; 0.021% Mo (inferred)
Labor : 595 workers in the construction phase and 178 workers during operations.

Current status : Feasibility Assessment finished in the beginning of 2014, and EIA approved in July
of 2014. The implementation is estimated for the end of 2015, after almost 2
years of construction on the project.
3.2. COPEC Project - www.empresascopec.cl
DIEGO DE ALMAGRO (Minera Sierra Norte S.A.)
A deposit located in the Atacama Region, approximately 12 km to the west of Diego de Almagro, 15 km to the
southwest of the Pampa Austral reservoir and 50 km east of Chaaral. The deposit is of the IOCG type (iron oxide
minerals with copper and gold content) and has reserves of 300 Kt of copper content mas well as 27 Koz of gold
in two sectors called Esther and Carmen-Paulina. This project was pushed by Cerro Dominador initially, and is
now property of Mineral Sierra Norte, an affiliate of the COPEC mining group.
The project considers the development through open air mines, and benefits from mineralized resources of the
oxide, mixed, and sulphured types, reaching the processing amounts of 100 Mt of mineral. The oxides will be
processed in a leaching plant, through solvent extraction, and electro-winning (Lx-Sx-Ew) to produce around 11
ktpa of SxEw cathodes. The sulphur, on the other hand, will be processed in a concentration plant with around 24
ktpa of fine copper in concentrates. The project considers the use of seawater and the conduction of it through
an aqueduct to the installations of the project.
Resources : Without information
Treatment Capacity : 24 ktpd of sulphur mineral and 2 ktpd of oxide mineral.
Seawater usage : Desalinization plat located in the area of the concentration plant. The flow rate
for desalinization would be of 1,865 m3/day and provide desalinized water for
lesser processes, the greater consumption amounts would be direct seawater (not
desalinized)
Labor : 595 workers in the construction phase and 178 in the operation phase.

Current status : Project approved by the SEA in July of 2015. The implementation of both
production lines is expected not before 2018.
3.3. Hot Chili Project - www.hotchili.net.au
PRODUCTORA (Soc. Minera El guila Ltda.)
The Productora project is located in the Sierra Coyiguales area, 18 km to the southeast of the city of Vallenar, in
the Atacama Region. An assessment of the development reach in Productora indicates that it possesses enough
resources to be able to develop an open pit mine and process the mineral obtained through a concentrating plant
of 30 ktpd treated, with the purpose of producing copper concentrate with around 50 ktpa of fine content copper
and 42 Koz of gold content for a useful lifespan of 20 years.
A great opportunity for the project was identified during 2013, which corresponds to an area of copper oxides,
which has the potential of significantly reducing the capital costs of prestripping and diminishing the ramp up
time, adding another source of income for the project. It is to be noted that an estimate of the oxide mineral
resources was not considered previously in the operational plans of the Company for the project.
During May of 2014, Hot Chili was able to secure a loan of US$ 25 million from the Sprott Asociacin. The funds
will be destined to advancing the Productora project. This will include finishing the prefeasibility assessment,
perforation campaigns, the capital for the general tasks, and the initial work for a definitive feasibility assessment.
In July of 2015 contracts were signed through which CAP Mineria will be integrated to the project with a 17.5%
participation with the option of receiving up to 50.1% depending on the engineering studies.
Resources : 214.3 Mt @ 0.48% Cu; 0.11 gpt Au; 172 ppm Mo
Labor : Information not available

POTENTIAL New Prefeasibility Without EIA 2018
Current status : The project is developing the prefeasibility assessment, which may be finished
during 2015, to later initiate the feasibility assessment of the project, to be
developed during 2015 and the end of 2016. The implementation will not take
place before 2018.
3.4. Pucobre Projects - www.pucobre.cl
EL ESPINO (El Espino S.A.)
El Espino is a copper-gold project located 36 kilometers to the northwest of Illapel, province of El Choapa, in the
Coquimbo region, and is property of Pucobre through the affiliate Explorator S.A., acquired in its totality in March
of 2011 from the Canadian Company Explorator Resources Inc. Currently the affiliate has been called El Espino
S.A.
According to the latest estimates carried out by Pucobre, the El Espino project considers the construction of a LX-
SX-EW plant to treat 6.3 ktpd of leachable minerals and a concentrator plant to treat sulphide minerals at a rate
of 20 ktpd. The estimated production for oxides is of 7.2 ktpa of copper in cathodes, while for sulphides it is of
32.8 ktpa of fine copper and 25 Koz of gold content in concentrates, all for a useful lifespan of approximately 18
years.
Resources : 230.3 Mt @ 0.447% Cu; 0.191 gpt Au
Treatment Capacity : 20 ktpd of sulphur mineral and 6.3 Ktpd of oxide mineral.
Labor : 2,900 workers in the construction stage and 700 workers in the operation stage

Current status : Project carrying out the feasibility Assessment and with EIA presented in April of
2013. The company foresees the termination of the feasibility Assessment and the
approval of the EIA during 2015, to begin operations not before 2017.
4. Metallurgic Plant Projects

4.1. Codelco Project - www.codelco.cl
MOLYBDENUM TREATMENT PLANT (Molyb Ltda.)
Within the past few years Codelco has shown that it needs to have an independent molybdenum concentrate
processing plant available, so as to not depend critically on the know how and interests of a third party. Also,
important current and potential clients of Codelco have suggested the convenience of a facility with minimum
third party interference. This is to make of Codelco a more trustworthy and safe offering for a critical input used
in the business of specialized steels.
The project, located in the community of Mejillones has the feasibility Assessment finished and the investment
approved by the Board of Directors of Codelco for US$ 394 million, and consists o f a molybdenum plant with an
initial treatment capacity which would reach 15 ktpa of fine from toasting and 16 ktpa of fine from leaching. Also
it could produce around 4,000 tpa of molybdenum content as iron-molybdenum (FeMo), with the possibility of
duplicating the production to 8,000 tpa depending on the commercial demand for this product; 5.4 tpa of
rhenium; 4,000 tpa of Mo in bricks and an acid plant which would produce around 32,000 tpa of sulphuric acid.
This initiative will be operated through Molyb, an affiliate of Codelco, and will initiate production during the
second trimester of 2015. The estimated useful lifespan is of 25 years.
The first EIA of the project was favorably received in 2008, with the emission of the Environmental Qualification
Resolution # 0230/08. However, due to the current project incorporating rhenium and iron-molybdenum plants,
modifications to the EIA had to be made, obtaining the approval RCA in mind 2012, with resolution # 202/2012.
The corporation contemplates an expansion project in 2018, with the purpose of duplicating the producing the
molybdenum production capacity, of toasting as well as leaching, to be able to reach the production of 30 ktpa
and 21 ktpa of fine Mo, respectively.
Treatment Capacity : 15 ktpa fine from toasting and 16 ktpa fine from leaching.
Labor : Between 570 and 950 in the construction phase and 185 in that of operations.

Current status : Project in execution. In January of 2014, Codelco informed the beginning of
construction on the project. The implementation is estimated for 2016.
4.2. LS-Nikko Copper Project
METAL RECOVERY PLANT / Planta Recuperadora de Metales SpA
Then Planta Recuperadora de Metales project, located in the community of Mejillones, Antofagasta region, and
next to the Molybdenum Treatment Plant by Molyb, is a joint property venture between the Korean company LS-
Nikko Copper (66%) and state-owned Codelco (34%). It consists in the installation and operation of a processing
plant of two by-products coming from the refineries: refinery precipitate rich an copper and copper and anode
slime, to recover and commercialize the precious metals contained in these products, such as tellurium, silver,
gold, palladium, platinum, and selenium, as well as copper.
It is worth noting that the precipitate corresponds to an intermediate product which is generated in the copper
refineries, and which after a leaching process in which the copper is removed, is transformed into what is called
anode slime. The precipitate possesses a high copper content (averaging over 25%) and important contents (of
economic interest) of precious metals as those already mentioned. For their part, the anode slime possesses gold
content of over 0.18% and/or silver content of over 17%.
The production of the metals will depend on the ore grades of the by-products being processed, estimating that
on average the following amounts will be produced each year: 5 tons of gold, 500 tons of silver, 150 kilograms of
palladium, 10 grams of platinum, 200 tons of selenium, 20 tons of tellurium, and 1,600 tons of copper sulphide.
The type of product and the quantities shows the high value of the by-products to be produced in the plant.
Also, an average of 15,000 m3 per year of a copper rich solution will be produced which will be dispatched to
Codelcos processing plants, and eventually to third parties, for the production of copper cathodes from the Sx-
Ew processes.
Treatment Capacity : 4,000 t of product through refining
Labor : Between 120 and 300 in the construction phase, and 60 to 90 for operations.

Current status : Project in execution. Currently has RCA approved from November 2013, with
which the implementation is expected for the beginning of 2016.
ANNEX 2: Description of the investment projects in gold and silver mining
1. Atacama Pacific Gold Project - www.atacamapacific.com

CERRO MARICUNGA (Minera Atacama Pacific Gold Chile Ltda.)
The Cerro Maricunga project, is a property of the Canadian Atacama Pacific Gold company, and is located 140
kilometers to the northeast of Copiap, in the Atacama
Region, in the extreme north of the Cinturn de Maricunga
and 20 kilometers to the south of the gold and silver mine of
Kinross Gold, La Coipa.
This deposit contains resources measured and indicated of
248 Mt with grades of 0.42 gpt of gold, equaling more than
3,334 million ounces of gold content. Also it possesses
potential resources in the inferred category which reach 226
Mt with an ore grade of 0.36 gpt, equaling 2.65 million ounces
of gold content.
According to the Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA, for
the initials in English) finished in March of 2013, the project
contemplates extracting through pits of the oxide mineral to
be processed at a rate of 80 ktpd though conventional
leaching in piles, with which it will produce around 298 Koz of
gold on average during the first 5 years of operation, for later
maintain an average production of 220 Koz per year of gold Fuente: PEA Cerro Maricunga -Atacama Pacific Gold
during the useful lifespan of the project which will last 10 years.
In June 2013, Atacama Pacific Gold signed a joint venture agreement with Eton Chile, an affiliate of Exeter
Resources who is developing the Caspiche project, for the exploration of potential sources of subterranean water
in the shared properties of Cuenca Dos and Laguna Verde, in the Atacama Region.
Also, in July of 2013, the company signed an agreement for the purchase of 2.5 million cubic meters of water per
year, which represents a flow rate of 80 l/s with the company Aguas Chaar S.A, to supply the demand of water
for the alternative of the processing plant of 65ktpd. However, the agreement indicates that it is possible to
increase the water usage rate to meet the demands of 80 ktpd of processing, equivalent to 100 l/s.
According the company declarations, in July of 2014 the feasibility Assessment was advanced in the modifications
of the processing type and of the mining plan to be considered. Likewise, the company indicated that it was
waiting for estimates from providers with respect to the purchase of equipment and some elements for the
infrastructure. The closing of the negotiations, as the end of the feasibility, was expected for the third trimester
of 2014.
Resources : 252 Mt @ 0.434 gpt Au
Treatment Capacity : 65 ktpd to 80 ktpd of oxide minerals for cianide leaching
Estimated investment : MMUS$ 587.

Labor : Information not available

POSSIBLE New Feasibility Without EIA 2018
Current status : Project with feasibility finished in the middile of August 2014 and in the process
of negotiating with equipment and infrastructure providers. Currently preparing
Assessment to register with the SEA, with which, implementation will not begin
before 2018.
2. Barrick Gold Projects- www.barrick.com

PASCUA (Ca. Minera Nevada S.A.) - www.pascualama.com
Pascua is a gold-bearing deposit

located 53 km to the north of the
ex-mine El Indio, at 4,600 metros
above sea level, which forms a
unit with the Lama deposit on the
Argentine side and which is being
developed with the
corresponding binational treaty.
The reserves are estimated in
17.1 Moz of gold and 560 Moz of
silver, principally as oxides.
75% of the mineral will be
extracted from Chilean territory
(Pascua) and the rest from Fuente: Barrick Chile
Argentina (Lama). The mineral
will be crushed at the extraction site and will be transferred to the plants located in Argentine territory. A cyanide
leaching plant is being contemplated which would treat the non-impervious mineral (83% of the total), from which
the metal dore19 is obtained, and a concentration plant for the impervious mineral (17%), from which a copper
concentrate rich in gold and silver is obtained.
The total projected production would reach 850 koz/ year, in gold and 35,000 koz/year of silver (26 tpa of gold
and 1,100 tpa of silver approximately), of which 75% would be considered Chilean production. The marginal
content of copper in the concentrate is not availbale.
The company suspended20 construction work on the Chilean side of the Pascua Lama project while it worked on
environmental requirements and other types of regulations to satisfy Chilean authorities. Meanwile the activities
considered for the environmental protection will be continued as they have been authorized. The construction
activities in Argentina, wherein the greatest part of the key infrastructure of Pascua Lama is located, which
includes the processing plant and tailings tank, were paralyzed also, even though they have been finished.
According to the company, the reduction finishing (ramp down) is programmed for the middle of 2014. The
company expects to have approximately US$ 300 million21 in costs during 2014 to carry out the ramp down and
to comply with the environmental and social obligations. The remaining tasks for project implementation will be
done in stages, with specific budgets and work programs, with the purpose of ease in project planning, as well as
to control the costs of the same. Barrick will explore opportunities to improve the projects economy and effective
materialization, including strategic associations or payment of royalties and other agreements for the income
flow. The company maintains an active option of restarting the development of this mining activity, which has a
useful lifespan of 25 years.
It is to be noted that in July of 2014, Barrick signed a memorandum of understanding with 15 of the 18 Diaguita
communities in the Huasco valley, which considers a six month horizon for these to see, through their
representatives and first hand, the main impact of the gold and copper projects, as well as the control measures
and mitigation.
This memorandum of understanding is aligned with the standards of the Convenio 169 of the OIT, to which Chile
is subscribed.
Resources : 176.95 Mt @ 1.303 gpt Au; 22.389 gpt Ag; 0.060% Cu
Treatment Capacity : 33 ktpd of mineral during the first 3 years and 44 ktpd for the rest of the useful
lifespan of the project.
19
Dore metal is a gold and silver alloy, of variable proportions which are molded into bar form. It is obtained from the recovery process of the noble ores
present in the minerals and is one of the typical forms of commercializing mined gold. Later the alloy is submitted to a refining process wherein the gold
and silver content are separated, for their respective markets.
20
This occurred after the Appeals Court of Copiap accepted a no-innovation order (ONI) for the project, and in July of 2013 ratified the momentary
suspension of the project, after a protection resource was presented by five indigenous communities from the Huasco Valley, referring to a series of
environmental irregularities such as the destruction of the Toro 1, Toro 2, and Esperanza glaciers, located in the vicinity of the mine site, and the
contamination of the hydrological resources, as a result pf the deposit of waste rock, without being operative the acid draining plant which would impede
such. New information is expected at the end of May. It is to be noted that the project has already been fined two times for more than $160 million in
March and April.
21
It is hoped to capitalize approximately 25%, related to the water management systems and finish some minor work in Argentina and Chile. The current
expenses will depend on a number of factors including the environmental requirements and regulations.
Estimated investment : MMUS$ 4,250 (Equivalent to the part of the project budget to be raised in Chile,
of a total of MMUS$ 8,500)
Labor : 6,000 workers maximum in the construction phase, and 1,660 workers in the
operational phase.

PROBABLE New Execution EIA approved (*) 2017(e)
(*) Currently suspended in a decision from the Environmental Agency
(e) = estimate
Current status : Execution suspended for external factors. The company indicated that the
decision to recommence the project development will depend on an
improvement in the economic situation and lesser uncertainty with respects to
the legal and regulatory requirements. With this information Cochilco estimates
the project implementation will not occur before the end of 2017.
3. Exeter Resource Corp. Project - www.exeterresource.com

CASPICHE XIDOS (Minera Eton Chile)
The Caspiche project is located in the Maricunga belt, 120 km from Copiap, between the gold and copper deposit
of Cerro Casale, and the Refugio mine, at an elevation of 4,200 to 4,700 meters above sea level.
The principal parameters of mining resources that the project has is estimated at 889 million tons, with 0.58 gpt
of gold, 0.24% of copper, and 1.13 gpt of silver, which translates into 19.3 million ounces of gold, 41.5 million tons
of silver, and 2.1 million tons of copper, which equals 30.1 million ounces of gold equivalent.
According the prefeasibility Assessment published in January of 2012, an open pit operation was estimated for 19
years, with a concentration plant treating 150 ktpd, as well as a leaching plant for the oxide minerals and low
grade copper. This last could treat minerals at 72ktpd during the first 5 years, to them work at only 33 ktpd during
years 6 to 10, after which the oxide operation would be shut down. The average production estimated in the
prefeasibility Assessment is estimated around 696 koz/y of gold, and 844 koz/y of silver (21 tpa of gold and 26 tpa
of silver approx..) and 110 ktpa of fine copper in concentrate, which would contain one part of both gold and
silver.
However, in May 2014 Exeter published a report about the results of the Preliminary Economic Assessment (PEA),
of the Caspiche project, wherein large modification of the prefeasibility Assessment from 2012 was released. In
this Assessment there are three options for materialization:
i. Open pit operation, 10 years of useful lifespan, to remove oxide resources and recover gold through heap
leaching, at a rate of 30 ktpd;
ii. Open pit operation with an 18 year useful lifespan, to use oxide resources (years 1 to 5) at 60 ktpd to
recover gold through heap leaching and sulphide resources (years 6 to 18) in a concentration plant of
27ktpd to produce copper and, later, to recover gold through cyanide leaching.
iii. Mixed operation, open pit with a useful lifespan of 5 years to recover oxidized gold ore through heap
leaching at 60 ktpd and subterranean operations (sublevel open stop) to extract sulphur mineral and
process it in a concentrator plant of 27 ktpd to produce copper, and later, recover gold through cyanide
leaching.}
As declared by the company, it would opt for a staged development, wherein it would chose the first
alternative, valued in US$ 344 million, to recover the oxidized gold ore through heap leaching at a rate of 30
ktpd for 10 years to produce 148,000 oz of Au equivalent during the first 5 years and then 122,000 oz of AU
equivalent the rest of the useful lifespan. However this option does not show, with improved market
conditions, what could be the most costly alternative (number three) with a value of US$ 1,968 million.
Resources : 1,601.7 Mt @ 0.488 gpt Au; 0.177% Cu; 1.167 gpt Ag
Treatment Capacity : 30 ktpd of oxidized ore (with the possibility of increasing to 60 ktpd and generate
a sulphurs line of 27 ktpd).
Estimated investment : MMUS$ 344 (could increase to MMUS$ 1,968 if the third alternative is developed
to complement the project).
Labor : Information not available.

POSSIBLE New Feasibility Without EIA 2017(e)
(e) = estimated
Current status : Project carrying out feasibility Assessment. In January of 2012 the prefeasibility
Assessment was finished, results were optimized in a preliminary economic
assessment developed in 2013 and published in May 2014. Cochilco estimates the
implementation date for 2017.
4. Kingsgate Consolidate Ltd. Project - www.kingsgate.com.au

NUEVA ESPERANZA (Laguna Resources Chile Ltda.)
Nueva Esperanza, previously called the

Arqueros, Project is located in the Cinturn
de Maricunga, to the east of Copiap.
The project consists of three well defined
mineral deposits as well as a series of
exploratory objectives which are being carried
out. The principal deposits are Arqueros,
Chimberos and Teterita. Arqueros has been
previously mined on a limited scale through
subterranean mining from the years 2000 to
2004, wherein the extraction was around
288,000 oz of gold equivalent. Also, Chimberos
was developed as a strip mine, giving around 20 Fuente: Kingsgate Consolidate
million ounces of silver in the years 1998-1999.
These three deposits currently have combined mineral resources of 29.7 Mt with average ore grades of 0.25 gpt
of gold and 79 gpt of silver, equivalent to 1.9 million ounces of gold equivalent.
The project initially considered developing the remaining resources of the previous development, considering the
installation of a processing plant for these minerals with a capacity of 6 ktpd, to produce 250 kg/y of gold and 100
tpa of silver during the 15 years of useful lifespan estimated for the project.
At the beginning of 2013 the company established a definitive work agreement meeting the Convenio 169 of the
OIT with the indigenous communities affected by the project, with the purpose of diminishing any possible impact.
In July, the SEA delivered the approved RCA for the project, with which the company hoped to begin construction
in September of 2013.
Due to a lack of electrical supply, in the most advanced stages of engineering the project should have considered
the generation of electricity, incorporating technology which required lesser consumption, changes which would
be implemented within the borders of the property which is in sub-conjunction with the area already evaluated
for the EIA: However, and in accordance with the current environmental codes, the changes introduced were
submitted for approval to the regional authorities in the area of the Environmental Evaluation System in a new
Environmental Impact Declaration (DIA) called Modificaciones Arqueros, entered in April of 2014.
However, in May 2014 the SEA of Atacama placed an early termination to the environmental evaluation of the
Environmental Impact Declaration of the Modificaciones Arqueros project, generating a new delay for the
beginning of construction, foreseen for the summer period of 2014/2015. Therefore, the company, in July of 2014
resubmitted the EIA of the project, correcting the lack of information requested by authorities and meeting the
requirements which where suggested during the period in which it was in the SEIA. Notwithstanding, in May of
3025, the company retracted the DIA from the environmental impact evaluation system, due to the development
of new mineral reserves in the Chimberos area.
The modifications considered in the project contemplate adding the Chimberos and Teterita pits, with a common
dump, as well as mineral processing through cyanide leaching in a permanent heap and the addition of a
thermoelectric plant. The modifications to the project also require adjustments be made in relations to the
crushing plant and complementary tasks, which includes the installation of a mineral transportation belt from the
plant to the cyanide leaching area.
Also, as is mentioned in the Environmental Impact Declaration, and in accordance with the current identification
of the mining reserves and the definition of the treatment capacity, the project will have a useful lifespan of eight
years. The additional material which will be extracted and which will feed the plant during the useful lifespan will
be around eight million tons, therefore the amount of additional tailings sent to the dumps will be around 27
million tons. The treatment capacity, including the processing of minerals from the Arqueros pit has already been
approved environmentally, and increases by 3 million tons per year, equivalent to 78.5 ktpd, with which an
average of 500kg/ y of gold and 170 tpa of silver.
Resources : 27.4 Mt @ 0.286 gpt Au; 84.34 gpt Ag
Treatment Capacity : 8 ktpd of oxide mineral for cyanide leaching.
Labor : 800 workers in the construction phase and 150 in operations.

POSSIBLE New Feasibility Without EIA(*) 2017
(*) DIA with modifications desisted in May of 2015.
Current status : Project developing feasibility Assessment, delving into mining prospection labors
and with environmental qualification desisted in May of 2015. Implementation of
the project is estimated for the end of 2017.
5. Kinross Projects - www.kinross.com

LA COIPA FASE 7 (Compaa Minera Mantos de Oro)
La Coipa is a gold mining site located 1,000

kilometers north of Santiago, and 140 km to
the northeast of Copiapo, in the gold
district of Maricunga, Atacama region.
The project denominated as the
Explotacin de Minerales Coipa Fase 7 in
the environmental impact Assessment has
the objective of extracting gold and silver
minerals from the new Pompeya deposit
to allow the operational continuity of the
current operation, due to the imminent
depletion of the mineral resources in the current pits on the site.
The new deposit would be developed through the conventional open pit method and the mineral transported to
the current processing plant because of proximity. It is to be noted that the La Coipa site was designed to process
up to 15 ktpd of ore, for which, in accordance with what is indicated by the company in the EIA of the project, it
is confirmed that increasing the capacity of the plant, the equipment or the installations will be not be necessary.
Also it is estimated that the average amount which would reach the processing plant from the site would be less
than what has been arriving in the past two years, which will require lower amounts of inputs from the plant.
On another note, no construction or expansion of any installation or area related with the camp, workshops,
explosives storage, provisions supply area, and industrial or domestic waste management would be required, as
all of the existing infrastructure from the La Coipa site will continue to be available for the same purposes.
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) presented in July of 2013 was recalled by the company, which
coincides with the decision of Kinross to momentarily freeze their projects until the markets have stabilized.
Therefore the company will concentrate their efforts in the second semester of 2014 on continuing the
exploratory studies for the reopening of La Coipa. These will focus on the Pompeya deposit and on the Purn
mine, as a joint venture with Codelco 65% Kinross y 35% Codelco).
In July of 2015 the company represented the project to the SEA for the environmental approval.
Resources : 16.165 Mt @ 1.782 gpt Au; 45.906 gpt Ag
Treatment Capacity : 15 ktpd of mineral for cyanide leaching.
Labor : 100 workers in the construction phase and 80 workers in the operation stage.

PROBABLE Replacement Feasibility EIA presented 2018(e)
(e) = estimated
Current status : Project resubmitted for environmental approval in 2015. In this case, Cochilco
estimates that the implementation will not be before 2018.
ANNEX 3: Description of the investment projects in Iron mining
1. Andes Iron Project - www.conocedominga.cl

DOMINGA
The Dominga project, owned by the Chilean company Andes Iron, is located north of the historical EL Tofo Mine,
70 km north of La Serena and west of the Ruta 5 Norte, in the middle of the Coast Mountain Range in the
community of La Higuera, Elqui province, in the north of the Coquimbo region.
It consists of an open pit mine which will produce high grade iron concentrates, and as a by-product copper
concentrate. The mine projects production of 12 million tons of concentrate per year for pellet feed and 150,000
tons of copper concentrate yearly during a useful lifespan of 22 years.
The iron mineral will be sent through a subterranean concentration duct which will be built in the Totoralillo North
sector, where it existed in the XIX century as the first mining port of the area. However the copper concentrates
would be transported by truck.
The operation integrates three areas:
Sector Dominga: considers the associated installations in two zones of mineral development through strip
mining called Rajo Norte and Rajo Sur; a processing plant, a gravel deposit, and a heavy tailings deposit,
as well as all of the auxiliary work and installations associated with these procedures.
Sector Lineal: considers a system of subterranean aqueducts which will transport the water from the
Totoralillo sector to the Dominga sector. It also contemplates a subterranean concentrator duct which
would send iron ore from the Dominga area to Totoralillo; an electricity transmission line of 66kV and a
service road.
Sector Totoralillo: corresponds to the Shipping Terminal for iron concentrate which will reunite, also, the
thickening, filtering, and storage system installations, as well as the areas for collection, desalinization,
and water impulsion to the Dominga Sector, and the discharge of the seawater brine.
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was presented in2013, however the company began a dialogue with
the la Higuera community in 2011, with the purpose of creating awareness of the project with anticipation with
the communities possibly affected by the project.
Resources : 2,082 Mt @ 23.3% FeT; 0.07% Cu
Treatment Capacity : 95 ktpd of ores
Seawater usage : Desalinization plant located in the Totoralillo Norte area, with a 450 l/s capacity.
Labor : 9,800 workers in the construction phase, and 1,450 in the operational stage.
BASE New Feasibility EIA Presented 2019
Current status : Project in feasibility and in process of obtaining environmental permits.

Currently the only issue is obtaining the permits to build the port. The
implementation is estimated for not before 2019.
2. CAP MINERA Project. - www.capmineria.cl

ROMERAL FASE V
Minas El Romeral is one of the CAP Minera mining-metallurgic complexes and considers among the principal
assets the iron deposit Minas El Romeral and other productive and infrastructure installations necessary for the
benefit and management of the mineral it commercializes.
The Romeral Fase V project, to be carried out in the Coquimbo region, consists in prolonging the extraction
activities carried out in the El Romeral Mines, extending the useful lifespan for a period of 13 years. The project
will develop high and low ore grade resources in addition to those contemplated in Fase IV, where the current
prospections show the existence of 390 million tons of mineral as a mining resource below the current phase. To
be able to access these resources it is necessary to expand, the Cerro Principal pit as well as the Norte and Sur
dumps, as well as improve some of the current installations.
This expansion contemplates improving and using part of the existing infrastructure, therefore only a few
additions on a smaller scale will be required, such as the expansion of the mechanic shops, a new parking area for
mining equipment, changing houses, lunchrooms, the relocation of powder kegs and the explosives plant.
Additionally, it will carry out technological adaptations and maintenance in the existing infrastructure to reach the
desired extension of the useful lifespan.
It is to be noted that the project does not contemplate an increase in the extraction rates of the deposit nor of
the processing capacity of the existing plant.
Resources : No information available.
Treatment Capacity : No information available.

Labor : Currently in the site there are 427 company workers and around 633
contractors, with estimates of an additional 200 workers in the construction
phase and 425 in the operational phase (company + contractors).

Current status : The EIA of the project received the approval of the RCA during the second
semester of 2013, beginning construction immediately. Currently the company is
studying the economic viability of the El Romeral mine, because of the low iron
prices. Therefore the implementation would be for 2015.
3. Hebei Wenfeng Industrial Group Project - www.wfsteel.com

OSO NEGRO (Minera San Fierro Chile Ltda.)
The Oso Negro project, property of the Chinese group Hebei Wenfeng, is located approximately 60 km south of
the city of Copiap. It considers the operation of an iron mine from a vein located in the Cerro Bandurrias sector
for the later transportation overseas to the mineral processing plants located in China.
The operation would begin with the old gravel layers located over the ore, continuing with following with the
stripping, and finishing with the ore extraction from the pit. The pit will be 1,200 m long and 300 wide.
The daily extraction average has been estimated at 4,805.45 tpd, to be crushed and submitted to a dry magnetic
separation, with the purpose of producing 2,988 tpd daily of dry concentrate with a 55% iron content.
The processing plant will have a primary crusher, a secondary crusher, a fine material collection system, high
pressure milling or HPGR, dry magnetic separator, different transportation belts for mineral transportation within
the plant, a dust suppression system, and the transportation of dry concentrate to the Punta Caleta Port or to the
Punta Totoralillo port, depending on the final collection place.
Treatment Capacity : 4,805 tpd of iron ore.
Labor : 220 workers in the construction phase and 500 workers in the operation phase.
POSSIBLE New Feasibility EIA presented 2016(e)
(e) = estimated
Current status : Due to the delay in the approval of the EIA, presented in 2012, Cochilco estimates
that the projects implementation will not be before 2016.
ANNEX 4: Description of the investment projects of industrial minerals
1. Ingenieros Asesores Ltda. Projects

ARBIODO
The Arbiodo project corresponds to a non-metal mining project whose main objective is the production of iodine
and nitrates from caliche, passing through a series of processes within the area of development and the industrial
plants of the Mining area.
From the territorial and analytical points of view, the project is made up of three fundamental areas, which
correspond to the Coastal Area, the Pampa Area, and the Mine Area.
The Costal Area is made up of the water intake for seawater at the extraction point, as well as part of the length
of the duct which is 18,83 km long, in this area there are two pumping stations associated with the water flow;
the Pampa Area is made up of 28.34 km of aqueduct; and the Mine Area, which corresponds to the place where
the mineral extraction takes place and wherein all of the productive and industrial processes for obtaining iodine
and nitrates takes place, and furthermore, where the industrial plants and installations associated with project
development will be located. This area contains 14.43km of aqueduct for seawater.
The section of the aqueduct for seawater will have a service road, which will be used for the installation of the
pipeline as well as for maintenance. Along with the pipeline will be the electrical transmission line which will feed
the pumping stations for the water source, and will also will also deliver the energy for the functioning of the Mine
Area installations.
Also, it contemplates the exportation of the finished product to the port of Chaaral, preferably, which is located
in the town with the same name in the Atacama Region (however the use of the Antofagasta and/or Mejillones
Ports area also being considered, both being in the Antofagasta Region.
Treatment Capacity : 400,000 t/year of nitrate prills, 20,000 tons/year of boric acid and 2,7800
tons/year of iodine.

Labor : Between 325 and 400 workers in the construction stage and 250 and 450
workers in the operational stage.
POTENTIAL New Feasibility EIA presented 2017
Current status : Project with EIA presented in March of 2015 with a request for early termination
for issues not corrected in May of 2015.
2. SQM S.A. Projects - www.sqm.cl

AMPLIACIN PAMPA BLANCA (SQM Industrial)
The project corresponds, principally, to the expansion of the current Pampa Blanca mining site, located to the
south of the SQM operational center in Maria Elena, consisting of the incorporation of six new mining zones to
increase the caliche extraction rate to 37,300,000 tpa for a useful lifespan of 50 years.
Additionally it considers the incorporation of two industrial areas, to increase the production of iodide to 10,000
tpa of iodine equivalent to feed a new iodine plant which will increase iodine production to 10,000 tpa and the
production of nitrate salts at 3,425,000 tpa (equivalent to the production of 1,293,000 tpa of NaNO3).
Complementarily, it would equip the project with a new electrical transmission system and a storage system of
500 l/s of seawater from the Bay of Mejillones, to address the increase foreseen in the productive levels.
Treatment Capacity : No information available.

Labor : 765 workers in the construction phase and 510 workers in the operational
phase.
PROBABLE Expansion Execution EIA approved 2017
Current status : Project with DIA approved in October of 2013. Currently the company indicates
that the project is under evaluation due to market conditions. The
implementation is not estimated before 2017.
3. White Mountain Titanium Corp Project - www.wmtcorp.com

CERRO BLANCO
White Mountain Titanium is the owner of the rutile (titanium) deposit Cerro Blanco, located near the Port of
Huasco, 39 km to the west of the city of Vallenar, in the Atacama region. The name is due to the location of the
deposit on the hill with the same name.
According to the last definition of resources and reserves of the company, it is estimated that the reserves of the
mineral rutile in the deposits for the project are of 81.5 million tons approximately, with an average ore grade of
1.97% rutile (TiO2), and a cut-off grade of 0.8%, as well as a sterile/mineral average of 1.78.
The companys project considers developing the mineral resources through the process of conventional open mit
mining with a development rate of 4 million tons per year of rutile mineral, equivalent to an average total material
use (mineral and sterile) of 11 million tons per year. The total of the exploitation of the deposits will end in a
period of 20 years and 4 months.
Also, the gravitational concentration, flotation and magnetic concentration plant will produce approximately
135Ktpa of rutile concentrate (TiO2), with an ore grade of approximately 96%. The concurrent feldspar production
considered in the feasibility study will be reviewed by the company in the future.
The project will have an estimated useful lifespan of 24 years, including 6 months programmed only for
acquisitions and detail engineering, 18 months for the construction phase, 21 years for the operation phase, and
1 year for the closing phase.
Resources : 111.5 Mt @ 1.75% TiO2
Treatment Capacity : 17.5 Ktpd of rutile mineral.
Seawater usage : Desalinization plant located close to the Huasco community, with a 980 l/s
capacity.
Labor : During the construction phase an average of 765 workers will be hired. During
the operation phase an average of 510 workers will be hired.
Current status : EIA presented in the beginning of 2013 and approved in May of 2015. It is
estimated that the implementation will not happen before 2017.
ANNEX 5: Units of measurement and abbreviations

Weight and measurements Processes and inputs
g Gram g/L Grams per liter
kg Kilogram kg/L Kilograms per liter
t Metric ton l/s Liters per second
kt Thousands of metric tons l/m Liters per month
Mt Millions of metric tons kV Kilovolts
oz Troy ounces kVA Kilovolts-amperes
koz Thousands of troy ounces GWh Gigawatt-hour
Moz Millions of troy ounces MWh Megawatt-hour
lb Pound
Mlb Million pounds Production processes
m Meter Flot Flotation
km Kilometer Lix Leaching
m2 Square meter SX Solvent extraction
m3 Cubic meter EW Electro-winning
Chemical and mineral elements Money and prices

Ag Silver US$ US Dollar
Au Gold MUS$ Thousands of US dollars
Cu Copper MMUS$ Millions of US dollars
Cu ct Copper cathodes US$/lb Dollars per pound
Cu conc Copper content in concentrate cUS$/lb Cents of a dollar per pound
CuEq Copper equivalent US$/oz Dollars per Troy ounce
Fe Iron
Fsp Feldspar Geographic Abbreviations
H3BO3 Boric acid m.s.n.m. Meters above sea level
H2SO4 Sulphuric acid UTM Universal Transversal Mercator
KCl Potassium chloride
KNO3 Potassium nitrate Types of societies
LiCl Lithium chloride Ca. Company
NaNO3 Sodium nitrate Inc. Incorporated
Mo Molybdenum Int. International
TiO2 Titanium dioxide (Rutile) Ltda. Limited
Ltd. Limited
Concentration and production rates S.A. Limited Liability Company
gpt Grams per ton SCM Contractual Mining Society
ppm Parts per million CCM Contractual Mining Company
oz/a Troy ounces per year
koz/a Thousands of Troy ounces per year Other
Moz/a Millions of Troy ounces per year Ind. Industrial
kg/a Kilograms per year Min. Mineral
tph Metric tons per hour RCA Environmental Qualification Resolution
tpd Metric tons per day DIA Declaration of Environmental Impact
tpm Metric tons per month EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
tpa Metric tons per year SAG Semi-autogenous
ktpa Thousands of tons per year API Authorization of Investment Projects
Mtpa Million tons per year PND Business and Development Plan
This report was elaborated in the Department of Studies and Public Policies by
Cristian Cifuentes Gonzlez

Strategic and Public Policy Analyst
Emilio Castillo Dintrans

Strategic and Public Policy Analyst
Jorge Cantallopts Araya

Strategic and Public Policy Director
August / 2015

Chilean Mining Investments-Project Portfolio 2015-2024 PDF

Transféré par

Informations du document

Titre original

Copyright

Formats disponibles

Partager ce document

Partager ou intégrer le document

Options de partage

Avez-vous trouvé ce document utile ?

Ce contenu est-il inapproprié ?

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Chilean Mining Investments-Project Portfolio 2015-2024 PDF

Transféré par

Droits d'auteur :

Formats disponibles

Chilean Mining Investments

Project Portfolio 2015 -2024

Intellectual Property Registry

Chilean Copper Commission

Chilean Copper Commission

Chilean Copper Commission

5.3. Global estimate of the production capacity of other minerals .........................................43

Chilean Copper Commission

1. Project of Atacama Pacific Gold - www.atacamapacific.com ...................................................87

Figure 1: Distribution of the investment in Chilean mining, according to condition ........................ 17

Chilean Copper Commission

Table 1: Conditions to carry out a project......................................................................................... 10

Chilean Copper Commission

Chilean Copper Commission

Chilean Copper Commission

2.2.1. Conditions for the materialization

Chilean Copper Commission

Table 1: Conditions for carrying out a project

Condition Project type Stage of advance SEA process Implementation

BASE Any Execution RCA approved Within the period

PROBABLE Any Feasibility RCA approved Within the period

Reposition or expansion Feasibility EIA or DIA in process Within the period

POSSIBLE EIA or DIA in process or

Any Feasibility RCA approved Outside of the period

EIA or DIA in process or

Any Feasibility suspended Any Outside of the period

EIA or DIA in process or

Any Pre-Feasibility Any Any

Source: Prepared by COCHILCO

2.2.2. Project type

Chilean Copper Commission

location. It also includes projects in current operations (brownfield), which contemplate a

2.2.3. Stage of advance

2.2.4. Processing before the Environmental Evaluation Service (SEA)

2.2.5. Implementation time frame

Chilean Copper Commission

2.3. The investments of Codelco and their information sources

Chilean Copper Commission

2.4. Investment in private mining and information sources

Chilean Copper Commission

2.5. Methodological criteria for estimating the implementation date

2.6. Estimating the production capacity of copper mines

Chilean Copper Commission

recovery capacity of the concentrating plants or the consumption of rates in acids in

Chilean Copper Commission

3. Investment in Chilean mining

Chilean Copper Commission

3.1. Project conditionality

Figure 1: Investment distribution in Chilean mining, according to condition

Source: Prepared by COCHILCO

Sector Total Base Probable Possible Potential

Chilean Copper Commission

Sector Total Execution Execution suspended Feasibility Pre-feasibility

Chilean Copper Commission

Chilean Copper Commission

3.2. Investment purpose

Figure 2: Investment distribution in Chilean mining, according to project type

Source: Prepared by COCHILCO

Chilean Copper Commission

3.3. Regional Investment

0 5.000 10.000 15.000 20.000 25.000 30.000 35.000

Source: Prepared by Cochilco

Chilean Copper Commission