International Conference on Advancements in Electronics and Power Engineering (ICAEPE'2011) Bangkok Dec.
, 2011
The Examination Electronic Services Quality of
Sina Bank with E-SERVQUAL Model in Shiraz
Branches
Amin Shapor Shayan Jahromi, Ebadolah Ahmadi, Farzane Fakhravari and Pouya Mostafa Adiby
AbstractThe main purpose of this research is to find out the
relationship between dimensions of electeronic services quality
(efficiency, availability, privacy, and fulfillment) and customers
electeronic satisfaction and trust. Morever, we would like to find how
these factors affects Sina Bank customerss loyalty based on E-
SERVQUAL model. In order to reach this purpose, a comprehensive
and accurate questionnaire was designed and analyzed with statistical
methods.
Data analysis showed that dimensions of electeronic services
quality directly related to customers satisfaction and trust and this
relationship is significant. The relationship between customers
satisfaction and trust with their loyalty is also significant and direct.
Keywords Electronic services quality, E-SERVQUAL model,
Satisfaction, Trust, loyalty.
I. INTRODUCTION
W ITH greater penetration of the internet and the
invention of new processes to service consumers
through the electronic media, consumers rely increasingly on
online sellers and service providers for even the most
rudimentary tasks and services.(sahadev & purani,2008) the
key element to e-commerce achievement is e-banking system
that its acts with financial and monetary systems. Associated
rival economics, customer oriented and attracting satisfaction
is base of business and the organizations have not regard to
them will be eliminate. Today strategic and traditional policies
focus on protection, increasing trust and loyalty of
organizations customers.( Athanassopoulos,2001) E-service
quality.
An important construct which has received significant
research attention in this regard is e-service quality. The origin
of e-service quality as a concept can be traced to the service
quality concept. Colier and Bienstock (2006) define e-service
quality as customers perceptions of the outcome of the
service along with recovery perceptions if a problem should
occur
E-service is conceptualized as an interactive information
service providing a mechanism for firms to differentiate their
service offering and build competitive advantage. Key themes
within the e-service quality literature include the dimensions
Amin Shapor Shayan Jahromi, Ebadolah Ahmadi, Farzane Fakhravari and
Pouya Mostafa Adiby. (e-mail: Pouya_adiby@yahoo.com)
78
and measurement of e-service, elements of the web experience
and the relationship between the web-experience, trust,
customer satisfaction, intention to purchase, and loyalty
(Rowley, 2006).
II. E-SERVQUAL: A SURVEY OF LITERATURE AND CONCEPTUAL
MODEL
According to Hofacker et al. (2007), e-services embody the
need satisfaction of traditional services, however by using a
new technology. Hence, while servicescapes and other
components of the traditional service satisfaction models may
still retain some meaning, the technology element and the lack
of personal contacts in the fulfillment of the service
completely transform the customer experience in the context
of e-services. Research in the context of technology readiness
of consumers (Parasuraman, 2000) and the interaction of
consumers with technologically advanced products (Mick and
Fournier, 1998) have established the differences in consumer
perspectives while consuming products or services with a
strong technology element. Further, as Ruyter et al. (2001)
contends, e-services require much more emphasis on
integration than offline services. Thus, it is argued that the
service quality framework introduced by Parasuraman et al. in
1985 may not achieve the same level of validity. The need to
develop a credible and robust model to describe and measure
service quality in the context of e-services stems from this
difference in customer experience. Several studies have
attempted to describe e-service quality over the past few
years.
Most have identified dimensions representing various facets
of the customers interaction with e-services. Here, we look at
six important studies which have developed and empirically
validated a measurement schema for e-servqual. While there is
considerable overlap between them in the labels attached to
dimensions, there is a pressing need for convergence. The
studies have used different contexts for the scale validation
process, and all have used rigorous methods like confirmatory
factor analysis (CFA) for model validation and obtained
statistically significant values to support their reliability and
validity. Table I presents an overview of the e-servqual
dimensions and the context in which the measurement models
were validated. The six studies also assessed the relationship
of the e-servqual dimensions with certain meaningful
 International Conference on Advancements in Electronics and Power Engineering (ICAEPE'2011) Bangkok Dec., 2011

dependent variables. The main purpose was to assess the Studies have also empirically validated the link between
construct validity. Table I also presents the dependent SERVQUAL and such outcomes as customer satisfaction
variables considered in these studies. (Cronin et al., 2000; Chenet et al., 1999; Shemwell et al.,
TABLE I. 1998; Spreng and Mackoy, 1995), trust (Sharma and
COMPARISON OF E-SERVQUAL STUDIES
Patterson, 1999), commitment (Sharma and Patterson, 1999),
Study Dimensions of e-service quality
Yoo and Donthu (2001) Ease of use, aesthetic design, loyalty (Ennew and Binks, 1996) in the context of offline
processing speed, security services. Thus, aspects related to the outcomes of service
Janda et al. (2002) Performance, access, security, quality in the offline context have received considerable
sensation, information research attention in the past.
Wolfinbarger and Gilly(2003) Fulfilment/reliability, web site However, this is not the case with e-services. Except for a
design, privacy/security, customer few exceptions (Ribbink et al., 2004; Harris and Goode,
Service 2004), studies looking at the consequences of e-servqual are
Parasuraman (2005) Efficiency, system availability,
few. In tune with the discussion related to the outcomes of
fulfillment, privacy
SERVQUAL in the offline environment, three outcomes are
Bauer et al. (2006) Responsiveness, reliability,
process, functionality, enjoyment proposed in the e-service context.
Colier and Bienstock (2006) Ease of use, privacy, design, The outcomes of trust, satisfaction and commitment have
information, accuracy, all received substantial interest in the context of e-commerce
functionality, order, condition, though not necessarily as consequences of e-service quality.
timeliness, order accuracy, The conceptual model posits the e-servqual dimensions
interactive faimess, outcome described by PZM as the antecedents of the outcome
fairness, procedural fairness
variables. The PZM framework describes e-service quality in
Loiacono et al. (2007) Ease of understanding, intuitive
operations, information quality, terms of four main dimensions:
functional fit to task, tailored (1) Efficiency. The ease and speed of accessing and using
communication, trust, response the site.
time, visual appeal, (2) Fulfilment. The extent to which promises made by the
innovativeness, emotional appeal, site are fulfilled.
on-line completeness, consistent
image, relative advantage
(3) System availability. The correct technical functions of
Except in the case of Parasuraman et al. (2005) (PZM), the site.
hereafter all the studies mentioned above were validated by (4) Privacy. The degree to which the site is safe and
requesting the respondent to recall a general e-retail or e- protects customer information.
shopping transaction without considering it from a particular The PZM framework has adopted the most rigorous
e-retail/e-shopping context. Further, except for PZM, all the procedure in describing and validating the e-servqual
other studies used purely convenience samples for validation, construct and hence can be considered as more robust.
thereby reducing the validity of the measurement instrument. The conceptual model is shown in Figure 1.
The present study focuses more on the consequences on e-
servqual and tries to understand the linkage between the e- Dimensions of e-services
servqual dimensions as explained by PZM and its outcomes. Efficiency
The conceptual model of service quality in the offline
environment considers service quality as the measure of what
customers expect from a company and what it is perceived as
providing. Studies in the past which have looked at service Fulfillment
Trust
quality in the offline environment have considered several
consequences of achieving superior service quality. For
instance, Zeithmal et.al. (1996) had established the Availability Loyalty
relationship between superior service quality and behavioural
intentions of consumers like greater loyalty; positive word of Satisfact
mouth, willingness to spend more with the company offering ion
superior service quality, and recommending the company to Privacy
other customers. The study, which was conducted among
customers of a computer manufacturer, retail chain,
automobile insurer and life insurer, established the positive
linkages between the original SERVQUAL dimensions and H1:The relationships between dimensions of e-service with
the behavioural intentions of consumers. The intentions customers satisfaction are significant and direct.
considered included such aspects as loyalty, commitment, H2: The relationships between dimensions of e-service with
inclination to recommend the service provider, etc. customers trust are significant and direct.
H3: The relationships between satisfaction and with

79
 International Conference on Advancements in Electronics and Power Engineering (ICAEPE'2011) Bangkok Dec., 2011
customers trust are significant and direct.
H4:The relationships between satisfaction and with
customers loyality are significant and direct.
H5: The relationships between trust and with customers
loyality are significant and direct.
III. TRUST, SATISFACTION AND LOYALTY IN E-COMMERCE
Trust has been considered as an important variable in the
context of e-commerce (Hoffman et al., 1999). According to
Lee and Turban (2001), one of the most frequently cited
reasons for consumers not purchasing from internet vendors is
lack of trust. Urban et al. (2000) have opined that
implementation of a technology like the internet involves trust
and therefore trust is very significant in e-commerce. Trust
has been defined in different contexts with different emphasis.
In general, trust is related to risk/unpredictability reduction
and involves a relationship between two parties. In e-
commerce, where the element of risk is often higher than in
traditional environments, the importance of trust is inflated
(Grabner and Kaluscha, 2003).
Trust as a construct has been considered quite widely in e-
commerce research (for a review, see Grabner and Kaluscha,
2003). However, very few of these studies have linked trust
with e-service quality. Most of the variables used as predictors
of trust are related to the reputation of the organisation
providing the service, the propensity of the individual to trust
others, perceived privacy, word of mouth referrals, etc. Harris
and Goode (2004) explored the linkage between e-service
quality and such constructs as e-trust and e-satisfaction.
However, e-service quality was measured using a scale
adopted from the offline context without splitting the
construct into its component dimensions. Hence, this study,
while establishing the relationship between e-service quality
and its consequences, is unable to describe the relationship
between the components of e-service quality and the
consequences. Ribbink et al. (2004) have found evidence to
80
link e-service quality-related variables to e-trust.
E-satisfaction has gained increasing importance in e-
commerce-related literature.
Szymanski and Hise (2000), in their path-breaking study on
e-satisfaction, conceptualised e-satisfaction as the consumers
judgement of their internet retail experience as compared with
their experience with traditional retail stores. Several studies
have considered the antecedents of e-satisfaction since then
(for a review, see Bansal et al., 2004). After reviewing past
studies which looked into this aspect, they concluded that
most of the variables attributed to generate e-satisfaction are
either related to the web site or to the perceived value of the
web site. Among this broad classification of variables into
web site characteristics or perceived value are certain
variables often associated with e-service quality? For instance,
Zeithmal et al. (2000) found association between such e-
service quality-related variables efficiency,reliability, security,
etc. and e-satisfaction. Service quality and satisfaction have
been linked quite widely in offline services research
(Shemwell et al., 1998).
IV. METHOD
A quantitative study is determined most appropriate for
examination of the measurement of e-service quality so after
the questionnaire is designed, its distributed to customers.
The statistical society is approximately 3000 customers of
Sina Bank Branches that they apply e-banking services.
According with Morgan table (1970) and layer sampling, it
consists of 342 respondents.
Examination of demographic characteristics indicates the
most common respondent to be male (%36 female, %64 male)
aged between 25 and 35 (%41), who uses e-banking for 2
years (%25). Respondents are mostly in the bachelor level of
education (%54).
V. ANALYSES
 International Conference on Advancements in Electronics and Power Engineering (ICAEPE'2011) Bangkok Dec., 2011

TABLEII It eliminates delaying of moving documents in the physical

INDEXES OF PATH ANALYSIS form, so speed of banking performance is increased that it is
Value of index kind of index resulted to high level of customers satisfaction and trust.
/231 (p-value) Banking past concepts should be reengineer and recent
64/36 (chi-square) process are substituted for improving e-services fulfillment.
0/020 (RMR) The key element for satisfying is employees behavior and
0.99 GFI(goodness of index) interaction. If employees provide suitable information for their
0.97 AGFI(adjusted goodness of customers when they have problems, their trust to online
index) services will be raise.
0.020 RMSEA(Root Mean Square The customers should be control their financial operations
Error of Approximation) without physical presence in retails for improving system
0.98 NFI(Normative Fit Index) availability. With e-banking system, the customers can deliver
1.00 CFI(Comparative Fit Index) diversifier services and give their order through electronic
1.00 IFI(Inceremental Fit Index) channels on time. The more electronic devices security is
resulted to more delivering personal information for
VI. DISCUSSION improving privacy.
The results from the path analysis throw up certain The third hypothesis is relationship between customers
important points for discussion. Five important hypotheses are satisfaction and trust is significant and direct. When people
confirmed. The first and second are relationships between search in site easily, give information quickly and also satisfy
dimensions of e-services quality and customers satisfaction from devices proffetianol operations, their trust to e-services
and trust are significant and direct. So when the level of become more and more.
efficiency, fulfillment, availability and privacy of e-services The fourth and fifth hypotheses are relationship between
are rising, the customers satisfaction and trust are increased, customers satisfaction and trust with customers loyalty
too. significant and direct. When newer and innovational
One way for improving organizations efficiency is characteristics of services are delivered to consumers, they
satisfying customers needs and expectations. achieve to excitement level and loyalty comes after this level.
E-banking system has make expend changes in efficiency Customers beliefs of e-services security affect on them for
and executive of banking network by information using online banking services explicitly. So making trust is
communication technology and does all of the accounts resulted to loyalty and using these services recurring.
operations and transactions between accounts at the moment.

81
 International Conference on Advancements in Electronics and Power Engineering (ICAEPE'2011) Bangkok Dec., 2011

VII. IMPLICATIONS
1- Designer of webs must examine risks of delivering e-
services for example:
- Security controls related privacy information.
- Destination password for firms, financial enterprises and
current customers.
- Certification of unconfirmed transactions.
- Preventing internet rubbery
2- Managers should verity unsatisfied customers to satisfy
because the cost of attracting is up to protect them.

REFERENCES
[1] Athanassopoulos, Antreas, Gounaris, Spiros and Stathakopoulos,
Valssis. (2001). Behavioral responses to customer satisfaction: an
empirical study. European Journal of Marketing, 35 (5/6), pp. 687-707.
[2] Colier, J.E. and Bienstock, C.C. (2006), Measuring service quality in e-
retailing, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 260-75.
[3] Grabner, K.S. and Kaluscha, E.A. (2003), Empirical research in on-line
trust: a review and critical assessment, International Journal of Human-
Computer Studies, Vol. 58, pp. 783-812.
[4] Harington , c. and weaven, s. (2008), E-retailing by banks: e-service
quality and its importance to customer satisfaction , European Journal
of Marketing Vol. 43 No. 9/10, 2009 pp. 1220-1231
[5] Harris, L.C. and Goode, M.H. (2004), The four levels of loyalty and the
pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics, Journal of
Retailing, Vol. 89, pp. 139-58.
[6] Hofacker, C.F., Goldsmith, R.E., Bridges, E. and Swilley, E. (2007), E-
services: a synthesis and research agenda, Journal of Value Chain
Management.
[7] Mick, D.G. and Fournier, S. (1998), Paradoxes of technology:
consumer cognizance, emotions and coping strategies, Journal of
Consumer Research, Vol. 25, pp. 123-47.
[8] Parasuraman, A., Zeithmal, V.A. and Malhotra, A. (2005), E-S-Qual, A
multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality, Journal of
Service Research, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 213-33
[9] Sahadev , s. and purani , keyoor.(2008), Modelling the consequences of
e-service quality , Marketing Intelligence & Planning Vol. 26 No. 6,
2008 pp. 605-620
[10] Shemwell, D.J., Yavas, U. and Bilgin, Z. (1998), Customer-service
provider relationships: an empirical test of a model of service quality,
satisfaction and relationship oriented outcomes, International Journal of
Service Industry Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 155-68.

82