Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

M ODELLING OF AN I NVOLUTE S PUR G EAR VIA F INITE E LEMENT M ETHOD

{ I BRAHIM K HALIL H USSAINI (4241606} S WINBURNE U NIVERSITY OF T ECHNOLOGY S ARAWAK C AMPUS FACULTY OF
E NGINEERING , C OMPUTING & S CIENCES

O BJECTIVES I NTRODUCTION R ESULTS 1


Is there any significant difference in bending Gear teeth often fail due to fatigue and this is Figure 1: Plot of the bending stress variation for = 20
when the pressure angle and module of an invo- the general incident observed. Minimizing the and m = 12.7, 17.5 and 21.9mm.
lute spur gear is varied and what is the optimum root bending stress will result in enough life en-
pressure angle (e.g., 14.5, 20 and 25 degrees) and hancement of the gear. This is research project is
module (e.g., 12.7, 17.5 and 21.9mm) of practical significance due to the reason stated For the first case, the pressure angle is held con-
above. In mechanical power transmission, gear- stant while the module is varied. As all the other
1. To model the effect of pressure angle on the ing is one of the most gearing is one of the most factors are a constant value, the module is in-
bending and contact stress of an involute essential parts; so is the case in industrial rotating versely proportional to the bending stress (s
1
spur gear machinery. Extra effort has been made to enhance m ). As the module m 0, the bending stress
2. To model the effect of module on the bend- the durability and strength by changing the vari- s . Likewise, as the module m , the
ing and contact stress of an involute spur ous parameters i.e. module and pressure angle. bending stress s 0.
gear
For the second case, the module is held constant
while the pressure angle is varied. As the pres-
sure angle 0, the Lewis form factor Y 0
M ATERIALS & M ETHODS R ESULTS 2 and the bending stress s . Similarly, As
the pressure angle , the Lewis form factor
The following softwares were required to com- m [mm] SW [%] ANSYS [%]
Y and the bending stress s 0.
plete the research: 12.7 1.68 0.71
17.5 22.73 1.08
ANSYS Workbench 16 21.9 31.71 2.03
SolidWorks 2016
Table 1: Summary of the experimental error distribu- Figure 2: Plot of the bending stress variation for m =
The following equations were used for statistical
tions for = 20 and m = 12.7, 17.5 and 21.9 mm. 12.7mm = 14.5 , 20 and 25 .
analysis:
[deg] SW [%] ANSYS [%]
Ft C ONCLUSION
s = (1) 14.5 2.15 2.7
mbY 20 2.12 2.38
The numerical study of the effect of varying pres- impractical to use. Also module has an effect on
25 21.53 16.39
sure angles and modules is what this research the size of the gear. The smaller the module, the
m = d/N (2) Table 2: Summary of the experimental error distribu- project is about. It can be derived from the study smaller the gear and vice versa. It can thus be in-
tion for m= 12.7mm and = 14.5 , 20 and 25 . that pressure angles and modules are significant ferred that gears with smaller modules will have a
(i) the load is applied at the tip a single tooth,
to gear stresses. With increasing pressure angle, higher bending as compared to gears with larger
(ii) the applied load is static and not dynamic,
there should be a decrease in bending stresses but modules unless compensated by changing the ma-
(iii) compressive forces are negligible and that
the extent to which the pressure angle can be in- terial property.
only tangential forces are considered, (iv) shear
creased is limited if not the gear would become
stresses are negligible, (v) the load applied is uni-
formly distributed across the gear tooth, (vi) fric-
tional forces are negligible and (vii) stress concen-
tration at the tooth fillet is neglected.

R EFERENCES F UTURE R ESEARCH C ONTACT I NFORMATION


[1] Ashish Mogrekar Vivek Karaveer and T. Pre- A gear surface will tend to wear given certain ing on pitting which is the wearing due to high Email 4241606@students.swinburne.edu.my
man Reynold Joseph. Modeling and finite element amount of time due to (i) Pitting, (ii) Scoring and contact stress between two surfaces. Hertzian or Phone +60149358485
analysis of spur gear. Intternational Journal of Cur- (iii) Abrasion. In our case we will be only focus- contact stress can also be called pitting stress.
rent Engineering and Technology, 3:2, 2013.
[2] Engineers Edge. Lewis factor equation for gear
tooth calculations, 2012.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi