Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Richard J. Smith, D.M.D., Ph.D.,* and Charles J. Burstone, D.D.S., MS.** Or Smith
Baltimore, Md., and Farmington, Corm.
Orthodontic forces can be treated mathematically as vectors. When more than one force is applied to a tooth, the
forces can be combined to determine a single overall resultant. Forces can also be divided into components in
order to determine effects parallel and perpendicular to the occlusal plane, Frankfort horizontal, or the long axis
of the tooth. Forces produce either translation (bodily movement), rotation, or a combination of translation and
rotation, depending upon the relationship of the line of action of the force to the center of resistance of the tooth.
The tendency to rotate is due to the moment of the force, which is equal to force magnitude multiplied by the
perpendicular distance of the line of action to the center of resistance. The only force system that can produce
pure rotation (a moment with no net force) is a couple, which is two equal and opposite, noncolinear but parallel
forces. The movement of a tooth (or a set of teeth) can be described through the use of a center of rotation. The
ratio between the net moment and net force on a tooth (M/F ratio) with reference to the center of resistance
determines the center of rotation. Since most forces are applied at the bracket, it is necessary to compute
equivalent force systems at the center of resistance in order to predict tooth movement. A graph of the M/F ratio
plotted against the center of rotation illustrates the precision required for controlled tooth movement.
Key words: Force, moment, couple, center of resistance, center of rotation, orthodontic tooth movement
T he literature on orthodontic biomechanics the arrow is proportional to the magnitude of the force.
usually concerns either specific applications of interest The actual length is arbitrary and will vary with each
to clinicians or basic questions primarily of interest to particular diagram, as with the scale on a map. In one
researchers. Few articles have attempted to explain case each millimeter of length might be equal to 10
biomechanical principles by an approach that would grams and in another case, to 100 grams. What is es-
allow the clinician without a background in engineering sential is that all the forces in a given diagram have the
to understand the concepts and their potential for clini- same scale, particularly if they are to be graphically
cal relevance. In this article, we attempt to review for added or subtracted. Dimensionally, forces are the
the clinician the basic relationships between forces and product of mass and acceleration and are measured in
tooth movement. units such as newtons or poundals. This complexity is
irrelevant to clinical needs, and the magnitude of forces
SCALARSANDVECTORS can be measured in common units of weight (such as
Physical properties (such as distance, weight, tem- ounces) or mass (such as grams).
perature, and force) are treated mathematically as either The point of application of a force is indicated by
scalars or vectors. Scalars, including temperature and the origin of the arrow, which in Fig. 1 is at the
weight, do not have a direction and are completely bracket. This is simply the point of contact between the
described by their magnitude. Vectors, on the other body being moved and the applied force.
hand, have both magnitude and direction. Forces may Direction is indicated by the body of the arrow
be represented by vectors. In addition to magnitude, itself and the arrowhead. Without the head of the ar-
direction and point of application must be taken into row, the body alone indicates the line of action. The
account. Direction consists of two properties-a line of sense is determined by which end we put the ar-
action and a sense. rowhead on.
In order to indicate all of these features, force vec- Almost every force applied in clinical conditions
tors are represented as arrows (Fig. 1). The length of will have effects in three planes of space. Throughout
this review, we will deal only with the idealized and
simplified analysis of forces and movements in two
*Associate Professor and Director, Postgraduate Program, Department of
Orthodontics, University of Maryland Dental School.
dimensions. Many mechanical principles become much
**Professor and Head, Department of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut more complex when three-dimensional aspects are
School of Dental Medicine. considered.
294
Volume 85 Mechanics of tooth movement 295
Number 4
Point of
Application
b cl
Magnitude
Fig. 6. The line of action of the force passes through the center
of resistance. This tooth will translate, even though the point of
attachment to the tooth is at the bracket.
Fig. 5. Types of tooth movement. A is translation, B is rotation, applied force does not pass through the center of resis-
and C is a combination of translation and rotation. tance, the force will produce some rotation. The poten-
tial for rotation is measured as a moment, and the mag-
nitude of the moment is equal to the magnitude of the
Types of movement force multiplied by the perpendicular distance of the
A tooth can move in one of three general ways: (1) line of action of the force to the center of resistance.
translation, (2) pure rotation, or (3) combined rotation Thus, if the force is measured in grams and the distance
and translation. Translation, or bodily movement, oc- in millimeters, the moment of the force will have units
curs when all points on the tooth move an equal dis- of gram-millimeters. Fig. 7 illustrates how to de-
tance in the same direction (Fig. 5, A). termine the perpendicular distance from the line of ac-
Rotation is used here in a restricted sense. As one of tion to the center of resistance.
the three basic types of movement, rotation indicates Note that either changing the magnitude of the force
movement of points of the tooth along the arc of a or changing the perpendicular distance of the line of
circle, with the center of resistance being the center of action of the force to the center of resistance has an
the circle (Fig. 5, B). equal effect on the magnitude of the moment. Doubling
Any movement that is not pure translation or rota- the force or keeping the force constant but doubling its
tion can be described as a combination of these two distance from the center of resistance will have iden-
forms of movement (Fig. 5, C). tical effects on the tendency of the tooth to rotate.
If forces are indicated by straight arrows, moments
Effect of forces can be symbolized by curved arrows. With two-
Translation: Ifthe line of action of an appliedforce dimensional diagrams, clockwise moments will be ar-
passes through the center of resistance of a tooth, the bitrarily defined as positive and counterclockwise mo-
tooth will respond with pure bodily movement (transla- ments negative. Values can then be added together to
tion) in the direction of the line of action of the applied determine the net moment on a tooth relative to a par-
force. ticular point, such as the center of resistance. Point of
Note that the point of application of the force does application and line of action are not needed; nor are
not affect its line of action. For example, consider a graphic methods of addition.
vertical hook welded to the bracket of a maxillary The direction of a moment can be determined by
canine (Fig. 6). If the hook has been positioned so that continuing the line of action of the force around the
its height is at the center of resistance, an elastic force center of resistance, as shown in Fig. 8.
attached to the hook will translate the tooth, even In summary, the moment of a force is equal to the
though the hook itself is attached to the bracket. magnitude of the force multiplied by the perpendicular
Moment of a force. If the line of action of an distance from the line of action to the point of reference
298 Smith and Burstone Am. .I. Orthod.
April 1984
Fig. 7. The moment of a force is equal to the magnitude of the force multiplied by the perpendicular
distance from its line of action to the center of resistance.
center
of rotation
t
,,----.,
B \\
I// \L
I 1 B I I
C
I
,/
I
v-
center of rotation
center of rotation
(
/--
\x
\
Ie? Am. J. Orthod.
-,
April 1984
4
\
I
1
\
/ D
/ /4
Fig. 15. The concept of a center of rotation can be used to
/ //
define any type of tooth movement in any plane of space. Illus-
center
of rotation the line of action and high for a point with a large
perpendicular distance to the line of action. A couple is
no more than a particular configuration of forces which
have an inherent moment. This moment is not relative
to any point.
For additional discussions of the concepts reviewed
Fig. 14. The center of rotation during incisor intrusion (or extru- in this section, we refer readers to the works of Mulii-
sion) is perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth. The amount gan,4 Hocevar, and Thurow.6
of palatal root torque accompanying the intrusion decreases as
the center of rotation moves farther from the tooth along the THE CENTER OF ROTATION
same perpendicular axis.
The movement of a tooth can be described with
more precision than is indicated by the three general
As in the symmetrical case, the translational effects categories of rotation, translation, and combined mo-
of the vertical forces cancel each other out. The mo- tion. For a more complete description, the concept of a
ments of these forces about the center of resistance center of rotation is used.
equal the magnitude of each force multiplied by its If a model of a tooth is attached to a piece of paper
perpendicular distance to this point. The upward di- by a pin, the point with the pin in it cannot move, and
rected force will have a moment of 50 gm x 10 mm, or this point becomes the center of rotation about which
500 gm-mm (Fig. 11, B). The downward-directed force the tooth can spin. If the pin is placed at the incisal
will produce a moment of 50 gm X 30 mm, or 1,500 edge, only movement of the root is possible (Fig. 12,
gm-mm (Fig. 11, C). However, the 500 gm-mm mo- A); if it is placed at the root apex, movement is limited
ment is negative (counterclockwise) and the 1,500 to crown tipping (Fig. 12, B). In each case, the center
gm-mm moment is positive (clockwise). The sum of of rotation is determined by the position of the pin.
these two moments will be 1,000 gm-mm (in a clock- Thus, in two dimensional figures, the center of rotation
wise direction), exactly the same as when each of the may be defined as a point about which a body appears
forces was 10 mm away from the center of resistance. to have rotated, as determined from its initial and final
It does not matter where a couple is applied to an positions.
object; the net effect is a moment equal to the mag- The center of rotation can be at any position on or
nitude of one of the forces multiplied by the distance off a tooth. In Fig. 12, C, for example, when it is a few
between them. The irrelevance of position is sometimes millimeters incisal to the apex, some movement of the
stated as the fact that a couple is a free vector. root apex will occur in the direction opposite the crown
It is important to distinguish between forces, the movement. Retraction of the maxillary canine with in-
moment of a force, and the moment of a couple. Only sufficient rcot movement has a center of rotation above
forces are actually applied to an object as a physical the apex of the tooth (Fig. 13). The more nearly trans-
entity. Moments are a measure of the turning ten- lational the movement, the farther apically the center of
dency produced by a force. The moment of a force is rotation would be located. In the extreme case, with
always relative to a point of reference, so that the mo- perfect translation, the center of rotation can be defined
ment of a force will be low relative to a point close to as being an infinite distance away.?
Volume 85 Mechanics of tooth movement 301
Number 4
A B C D
Fig. 16. Stick figures can be used to predict tooth movement and centers of rotation. The effects of
the force and couple are considered separately. (See text for discussion.)
center
l of rotation
e e zb
C
_,_.
....._.,,, _..
.. .-_, ......--._
0
JHHI
B C
Fig. 18. Teeth move according to the forces and movements
acting at the center of resistance. Most orthodontic forces are
applied to the tooth at the bracket. Understanding the relation-
ship between force systems at the bracket and the center of
resistance requires using the rules for equivalent force systems.
Fig. 17. The couple is in the opposite direction to the couple The force in A is equivalent to the force system in C, not to the
illustrated in Fig. 16. As a result, the apex moves less than the one in 8.
crown, and the center of rotation is apical to the tooth.
summed to a single force, and all the moments to a then add a very small counterclockwise couple. With
single moment, it follows that a single force plus a the force only, the center of rotation is an infinite
single couple can produce any type of tooth move- distance away. As the couple increases, it brings the
ment-in other words, any center of rotation. In this center of rotation in toward the tooth from infinity. If
section we will review the relationship between the net the couple is large enough relative tc?the force, the
moment and the net force at the center of resistance and amount of translation could become almost negligible
the resulting center of rotation. in comparison to the rotation, and the center of rotation
The extreme situations have been discussed: If the would be near the center of resistance. With the mag-
net effect on the tooth at the center of resistance is a nitude of the counterclockwise couple increasing, the
force only, the center of rotation will be at infinity center of rotation moves in from beyond the occlusal
(the tooth will translate), and if there is a net moment aspect of the tooth.
only, the center of rotation will be at the center of If the couple added in Fig. 16, C produced a
resistance (the tooth will rotate). The only means of clockwise moment rather than a counterclockwise one,
producing a moment with no net force is with a couple. the center of rotation would be apical to the tooth rather
For any tooth movement other than these simple than incisal. Again, as the couple increases, the center
conditions, a force and a couple will be present at the of rotation moves closer, but this time, it is approach-
center of resistance. ing from beyond the apex (Fig. 17).
In order to understand these combined effects,
EQUIVALENT SYSTEMS
stick diagrams are helpful. Fig. 16, A illustrates a
tooth with a force and couple at the center of resistance. The preceding discussion has primarily concerned
The general type of movement that will occur can be forces applied at the center of resistance and couples.
estimated by replacing the tooth with a simple line (Fig. Occasionally, attachments are used that allow forces to
16, B) and applying the force and couple separately. In act directly in this area. For the most part, however,
Fig. 16, C the effect of the force alone would be to forces are applied on the crown of the tooth. It has
translate the stick, and in Fig. 16, D rotating the al- already been mentioned that the moment of a force with
ready translated stick in the direction indicated by the respect to the center of resistance depends upon the
couple will result in more root movement than crown perpendicular distance of its line of action to the center
movement compared with the original position. of resistance, and therefore otherwise identical forces
Let us consider the effects of changing the ratio placed at different positions on the tooth have different
between the force and the couple. Suppose we start effects on tooth movement. In order to determine how a
with a pure force producing translation (Fig. 16, C) and tooth will move, it is useful to evaluate the force system
Volume 85 Mechanics of tooth movement 303
Number 4
f-3 Q rc 0 f-a
.a4
1400g-mm 1 ZOOg-mm 1200g-mm + ZOOg-mm = 1400g-mm
12mm
14mm
1oog &
OOQ
A B
Fig. 19. Force systems at the apex (or any other arbitrary point) change when bracket height is altered
(See text for discussion.)
Fig. 21. If the moment of the couple in Fig. 20, B were not large enough to counteract the moment of the
force, there would be a net moment at the center of resistance (Fig. 21, A). The resulting tooth
movement is analyzed in B and C, in which the force produces translation and the net moment
produces rotation. The larger the underestimation of the required couple, the greater the resulting
rotation (D).
1400g-mm
A B C
Fig. 22. The previous illustration (Fig. 21) demonstrated the consequences of underestimating the
counterclockwise couple needed for bodily movement. If the couple is overestimated, as in this figure,
the rotation of the tooth is in the opposite direction
Arbitrarily, we can sum moments about the apex. If in We now return from the academic exercise of com-
Fig. 19, A the bracket is 14 mm from the root apex, the puting moments about the apex to the clinically impor-
moment of the force about the apex will be 100 tant issue of the relationship between force systems at
gm x 14 mm or 1,400 gm-mm. But when a lOO-gm the center of resistance and force systems at the
force is applied to the bracket in Fig. 19, B, the mo- bracket. For bodily movement, the force system at the
ment of the force about the apex will be 100 gm x 12 bracket must be equivalent to a force with no couple at
mm or 1,200 gm-mm. To make Fig. 19, A and B the center of resistance. Fig. 20, A illustrates the de-
equivalent, an additional 200 gm-mm clockwise mo- sired force system. What force system applied at the
ment about the apex must be added to Fig. 19, B. A bracket is equivalent to a pure force at the center of
single force cannot be used to produce this moment resistance? First, forces in the x and y directions must
because it would violate one of the first two require- be equal to those in Fig. 20, A, so a 150-gm force at the
ments for equilibrium. With a couple, however, the x bracket is needed in the x direction. The final require-
and y resultant forces are unchanged, and the couple ment is that the moments about any point be equal. To
has the same effect wherever it is applied. Thus, a make calculations simple, let us consider moments
system equivalent to Fig. 19, A would involve applica- about the center of resistance. The force in Fig. 20, A
tion at the bracket of the same lOO-gm force plus the has no moment about the center of resistance, so that
200 gm-mm couple (Fig. 19, C). the system applied at the bracket must do the same. But
If the bracket in Fig. 19, B had been placed 2 mm to the 150-gm force at the bracket, multiplied by its 8 mm
the occlusal instead of 2 mm to the gingival, the distance to the center of resistance, results in a 1,200
lOO-gm force would have a moment of 1,600 gm-mm gm-mm moment. This moment of the force is in a
about the apex. To make the system equivalent to Fig. clockwise direction. To make the net moment about the
19, A where there is a 1,400 gm-mm clockwise mo- center of resistance equal to zero, a 1,200 gm-mm
ment, a 200 gm-mm counterclockwise couple would be couple in a counterclockwise direction must be added,
required. as in Fig. 20, B. Thus, the 150-gm force at the bracket
Volume 85 Mechanics of tooth movement 305
Number 4
..-.
........_
c3
A B
Fig. 23. The force system in A is rarely indicated in edgewise
technique. Almost all centers of rotation for maxillary canine
retraction result from a moment of a couple in the opposite
direction to the moment of the force, as in B. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30
M/F ratio at the bracket
plus a 1,200 gm-mm counterclockwise couple will pro- Fig. 24. This graph summarizes the relationship between the
duce pure bodily movement in this example. couple-to-force ratio at the bracket and the center of rotation for
a hypothetic tooth with a center of resistance to bracket dis-
Suppose that a couple had been added as described,
tance of 10 mm. The directions of the couple and the force are
but its moment was not quite enough, perhaps 1,000 as in Fig. 23, B. The M/F ratio has units of mm. (See text for
gm-mm instead of 1,200 gm-mm. At the center of re- discussion.)
sistance the net effect would be as in Fig. 21, A. The
net 200 gm-mm moment at the center of resistance will
be clockwise, because the 1,000 gm-mm counter- gm-mm needed to counteract the moment of the force
clockwise couple does not completely balance the (Fig. 22, A). In this case there is a net counterclockwise
clockwise 1,200 gm-mm moment from the applied moment at the center of resistance (Fig. 22, B). As Fig.
150-gm force. 22, C illustrates, there will be both translation and ro-
Stick figures can be used to explain how this tooth tation, but the rotation will produce less crown move-
will move; Fig. 21, B shows the translation due to the ment than root movement, so that the center of rotation
force, and Fig. 21, C shows the rotation due to the will be somewhere to the occlusal of the tooth. As this
couple. Note that in comparing the before-movement couple gets larger, the center of rotation will move in
and after-movement positions, the apices are closer to- from the occlusal direction, eventually becoming just
gether than the crowns. The center of rotation is apical occlusal to the center of resistance.
to the center of resistance of the tooth. If the moment Because it is the force system at the center of resis-
had been underestimated by 400 gm-mm rather than tance that determines how a tooth moves, and because
only 200 gm-mm, there would be more of a rotational the line of action of forces applied at the bracket is
effect (Fig. 21, D) and the center of rotation would usually a large distance from the center of resistance
move occlusally. Next let us consider the effects of (thereby producing a large moment), simple forces
eliminating the counterclockwise couple altogether, so applied at the bracket produce large rotation effects.
that the full 1,200 gm-mm clockwise moment due to Different centers of rotation along the long axis of a
the 150-gm force operates at the center of resistance. tooth are created by changing the magnitude of a couple
Since the center of resistance feels a 150-gm trans- in the direction opposite the moment of the force about
latory force and a 1,200 gm-mm clockwise moment, the center of resistance. For example, in retracting a
the tooth rotates more than it translates and the center of maxillary canine, it would be unusual to add a
rotation approaches the center of resistance. clockwise couple (Fig. 23, A). As far as the tooth is
Now consider what would happen if the coun- concerned, at its center of resistance there is already a
terclockwise couple had been slightly overestimated, so large clockwise moment when a single force is applied
that 1,400 gm-mm was applied instead of the 1,200 at the bracket. In edgewise technique, all variations of
306 Smith and Burstone Am. J. Orthod.
April 1984
canine retraction, including pure bodily movement, couple is now greater than the moment from the applied
more crown than root movement, more root than crown force. The center of rotation is incisal to the center of
movement, etc., are achieved by a force and a resistance. At first it is an infinite distance to the
counter-tipping couple (Fig. 23, B). incisal (position D). When the M/F ratio is 12 or 13 to
It should be emphasized that the magnitude of 1, the center of rotation will be at the incisal edge
forces and couples cannot be directly compared. The (position E, root movement), and as the M/F ratio in-
translation resulting from a 150-gm force has no rela- creases up to about 2011, the center of rotation becomes
tion to the rotation resulting from a 150 gm-mm couple. just incisal to the center of resistance (position F), ap-
In fact, roughly 300 to 400 gm is an effective force proaching a purely rotational movement.
level for mesial translation of a mandibular molar, but a This graph has important implications. It is the
couple with a moment of about 2,000 gm-mm is neces- ratio between the applied couple and force that deter-
sary for efficient molar uprighting. mines the type of tooth movement, not the absolute
magnitudes. (This mechunical principle does not take
MOMENT-TO-FORCE RATIOS AND into account the fact that magnitudes of forces and
TOOTH MOVEMENT couples are important in determining the biologic re-
From the preceding discussion, it follows that the sponse to an orthodontic force system.) Except for M/F
type of movement exhibited by a tooth is determined by ratios which result in centers of rotation near the center
the ratio between the magnitude of the couple (M) and of resistance, small changes in the M/F ratio have im-
the force (F) applied at the bracket.. IL In terms of portant consequences on the type of tooth movement.
direction, the moment of the couple is almost always An M/F ratio of about 8/ 1 will put the center of rotation
going to be in the direction opposite the moment of the at the apex, tooth movement being controlled tipping,
force about the center of resistance. while an M/F ratio of 1211 will put the center of rota-
Note that moments are measured in gram-millime- tion at the incisal edge, which is usually termed root
ters and forces in grams, so that a ratio of the two has movement. Contrast these two M/F ratios with an M/F
units of millimeters (this represents the distance away ratio of 10/l, which will result in bodily movement.
from the bracket that a single force will produce the Obviously, small changes in this ratio have major ef-
same effect). Unfortunately, it has become conven- fects on clinical tooth movement.
tional in orthodontics to ignore these units and just
SUMMARY
speak of the moment-to-force ratio as a pure number.
It is possible to graph the relationship between the Undesired or inefficient tooth movement during
center of rotation and the M/F ratio applied at the orthodontic treatment results from individual variations
bracket. This is for the situation in which a horizontal in biologic response and the improper use of forces.
force (perpendicular to the long axis) is applied at the Application of the rules of biomechanics allows one of
bracket along with a couple producing a moment in the these sources of variation to be reduced or eliminated.
direction opposite the moment of the force. Adapted The ability to measure and control couple-to-force
from Burstone and Pryputniewicz, Fig. 24 illustrates ratios at the bracket is a key to predictable and con-
these relationships for a tooth with a lo-mm distance trolled tooth movement.
from the bracket to the center or resistance. The We thank David Gipe for preparation of the illustrations
abscissa (x axis) gives the moment-to-force ratio at the and Barbara Bass for typing several drafts of the manuscript.
bracket, and ordinate (y axis) gives the distance from
the center of resistance to the center of rotation (in this REFERENCES
example, the units of the M/F ratio are millimeters). 1. Burstone CJ, Pryputniewicz RJ: Holographic determination of
When only a force is applied at the bracket (M/F centers of rotation produced by orthodontic forces. AM J OR-
ratio of zero), the center of rotation is just apical to the THOD 77: 396-409, 1980.
2. Burstone CJ, Pryputniewicz RJ, Weeks R: Centers of resistance
center of resistance (labeled A on the graph). The re-
of the human mandibular molars (abstract). J Dent Res 60: 515,
sulting tooth movement is uncontrolled tipping. As the 1981.
moment of the couple increases, the center of rotation 3. Pryputniewicz RJ, Burstone CJ: The effect of time and force
moves apically (toward the position labeled B). With a magnitude on orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res 58:
distance from the bracket to the center of resistance of 1754-1764, 1979.
4. Mulligan TF: Common sense mechanics. 2. Forces and mo-
10 mm, the center of rotation approaches infinity as the
ments. J Clin Orthod 13: 676-683, 1979.
M/F ratio approaches 10/l (position C). As soon as the 5. Hocevar RA: Understanding, planning, and managing tooth
M/F ratio passes 10/l, the net moment at the center of movement: orthodontic force system theory. AM J ORTHOD 80:
resistance changes direction, since the moment of the 457.477, 1981.
Volume 85 Mechanics of tooth movement 307
Number 4
6. Thurow RC: Edgewise orthodontics, ed. 4, St. Louis, 1982, The 14. Goldstein H: Classical mechanics, Reading, 1970, Addison-
C.V. Mosby Company. Wesley, vol. 7, pp. 93-124.
7. Haack DC, Weinstein S: Geometry and mechanics as related to 15. Marcotte MR: Prediction of orthodontic tooth movement. AM J
tooth movement studied by means of two-dimensional model. J ORTHOD 69: 511-523, 1976.
Am Dent Assoc 66: 157-164, 1963. 16. Yoshikawa DK: Biomechanical principles of tooth movement.
8. Frankel VH, Burstein AH, Brooks DB: Biomechanics of internal Dent Clin North Am 25: 19-26, 1981.
derangements of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg 53A: 945-962, 17. Burstone CJ: Application of bioengineering to clinical orthodon-
1971. tics. In Graber TM, Swam BF (editors): Current orthodontic
9. Panjabi MM: Centers and angles of rotation of body joints: a concepts and techniques, ed. 2, Philadelphia, 1975, W.B. Saun-
study of errors and optimization. J Biomech 12: 91 l-920, 1979. ders Company, pp. 230-258.
10. Christiansen RL, Burstone CJ: Centers of rotation within the
periodontal space. AM J ORTHOD 55: 351-369, 1969.
Reprint requests to:
11. Burstone CJ: The biomechanics of tooth movement. In Kraus Dr. Richard J. Smith
BS, Riedel RA (editors): Vistas in orthodontics, Philadelphia,
Department of Orthodontics
1962, Lea & Febiger, pp. 197-213.
University of Maryland Dental School
12. Hurd JJ, Nikolai RJ: Centers of rotation for combined vertical
666 W. Baltimore St.
and transverse tooth movements. AM J ORTHOD 70: 551-558,
Baltimore, MD 21201
1976.
13. Nikolai RJ: Analytical mechanics and analysis of orthodontic
tooth movements. AM J ORTHOD 82: 164-166, 1982.