Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 22

Article

Educational Management
Administration & Leadership
Transformational leadership 2017, Vol. 45(4) 566587
The Author(s) 2016

in the educational system Reprints and permission:


sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/1741143216636112
of the United Arab Emirates journals.sagepub.com/home/ema

David Litz and Shelleyann Scott

Abstract
Globally, there is increasing pressure on schools to enact change, and the literature indicates that
transformational leadership is positively associated with school leaders effectiveness at imple-
menting positive reforms. Here, we report on a study conducted in the United Arab Emirates
(UAE) within the current context of intense educational restructuring in the K12 system. The
purpose was to investigate whether school principals in the UAE practise transformational
leadership, and whether they and their teachers perceived principals leadership styles differently
to their western counterparts. This study adopted a mixed methodology, and revealed variation
in perceptions between principals and teachers related to whether principals were practising
transformational leadership. However, when analysed using Hofstedes cultural framework, this
variation may be related to cultural differences between the western orientation of the lead-
ership model adapted by Emirati principals and the Islamic orientation of the population.
Therefore, a new model of transformational leadership is proposed, based on a paradigm that
may be more appropriate for Middle Eastern/Islamic contexts. This Modified Transformational
Model may be useful to those leaders who wish to adopt transformational leadership with cul-
tural accommodations.

Keywords
United Arab Emirates, UAE, transformational leadership, educational change, cultural framework

Introduction
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) includes Abu Dhabi (the capital), Ajman, Dubai, Fujairah, Ras
al-Khaimah, Sharjah and Umm al-Quwain, each of which is governed by a separate but absolute
monarch. While the president of the UAE is chosen from the group of monarchs, political power
generally resides in the Abu Dhabi Emirate. Islam is the official religion, and Arabic is the official
language, although English is frequently used as a second language by many expatriates, who
comprise approximately 80% of the countrys population. Because the UAE controls the worlds

Corresponding author:
David Litz, Culture, Society & Linguistics Division, Emirates College for Advanced Education, PO Box 126662, Abu Dhabi,
United Arab Emirates.
Email: dlitz@ecae.ac.ae
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 567

fourth largest oil reserve, it also possesses a great deal of practical power and a solid economic
base. However, the emirates have endeavoured to allow greater public participation in governance,
as well as to provide a broader base of education and opportunity to residents in order to avoid the
political unrest experienced in much of the region (CIA, 2015).

Education in the UAE: a context of change


The 40-year history of public education in the UAE is short and unsettled. As recently as the 1950s,
education throughout the UAE mirrored that of many Gulf countries in that it was mainly limited to
village elders teaching the Quran. Later in the same decade, the first non-religious school opened in
Abu Dhabi, and this has been described as basic in structure and content, comprising a six-room
building with no electricity or teaching resources (Al-Fahim, 2006). In fact, no real culture of
modern schooling existed until the early 1970s, when the formal educational system was estab-
lished. Since then, massive changes have occurred as the UAE has endeavoured to take its place as
a world power.
Mass education, supported in part by the rise of Sheikh Zayed in 1971 and the subsequent
backing of substantial oil revenues, necessitated a reliance on expatriates primarily from other
Middle Eastern and North African regions, as well as India and Pakistan. This massive influx of
expatriate teachers and the rapid expansion of K12 schools and post-secondary educational
institutions nationwide not only had a profound effect on the country (Burden-Leahy, 2009), but
also resulted in what has popularly been described as an education crisis (Macpherson et al., 2007).
Recently reported problems include inadequate curricula, low student achievement, poor teaching
standards, insufficient numbers of Emirati teachers, poorly trained school management and a lack
of professionalism (Gaad et al., 2004; Macpherson et al., 2007; Ridge, 2009; Thorne, 2011).
Additionally, many schools continue to experience issues with organisational culture and poor
infrastructure (Gaad et al., 2004; Ridge, 2009). Thus, the UAE rulers have begun to scrutinize the
overall underperformance of the entire education system, and have released a far-reaching devel-
opment plan to raise education to international standards (Macpherson et al., 2007; Thorne, 2011).
At the national level, this education plan includes five strategies for change: clarifying policy,
setting new standards, utilising a 10-year development plan, restructuring educational management
and mobilising resources. In this way, the education system should align more closely with the
expectations of educational attainment in many western nations (Macpherson et al., 2007).
At the emirate level, educational change is also underway. Entities such as the Knowledge and
Human Development Authority (KHDA) and Abu Dhabi Education Council (ADEC) have been
established to assist in ensuring successful policy implementation (Al-Amiri, 2012). The govern-
ment has developed a series of technology-rich model schools and publicprivate partnerships with
local businesses nationwide, efforts have intensified to recruit Emirati teachers, universities have
been encouraged to improve school quality (Lewis and Bardsley, 2008; Macpherson et al., 2007;
Stringer and Hourani, 2015), and an increasing number of trained and qualified Emiratis are acting
as catalysts for change and improvement by taking up posts as school leaders (Stringer and
Hourani, 2015). Key performance indicators (KPIs) have also been developed, and standardised
testing has been instituted in the form of exit exams such as the Common Educational Proficiency
Assessment (CEPA).
Additionally, a transition away from rote learning to active teaching approaches is underway,
and there has been an increased focus on overhauling out-dated curricula (Lewis and Bardsley,
2008; Macpherson et al., 2007) to create a bilingual (i.e. English and Arabic) education system
568 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

wherein English is the medium of delivery for all math, science and English courses in some
emirates. This has necessitated the recruitment of large numbers of English Medium Teachers
(EMTs) from countries such as the United States, Ireland, the United Kingdom, South Africa,
Canada, Australia and New Zealand, as well as new regulations requiring non-native English-
speaking math/science and English language teachers to attain IELTS band scores of at least 5.5
and 6.5, respectively (Baker and Blaik-Hourani, 2014; Zaman, 2012). Moreover, the government
has mandated that schools adopt a program to improve basic skills, enforce discipline, require
attendance, help students prepare for exams, and focus on enhancing teachers and principals
overall skills (Abu Dhabi Education Council, 2012). The expansion of learning outcomes, provi-
sion of additional classroom resources, enhancement of professional development and mentoring
programs, enactment of new professional standards, and establishment of higher levels of support
and autonomy for teachers and school leaders are among the ways to accomplish the aforemen-
tioned goals (Abu Dhabi Education Council, 2012).
In sum, the modern UAE educational context has been profoundly shaped by societal
development, economic growth and extraordinary reform. Moreover, the changes faced by
UAE schools are similar to those faced by many developing nations (Leithwood and Jantzi,
2006); that is, raising all school facilities, curricula, pedagogy and outcomes to international
standards, clarifying educational policy, restructuring educational management, boosting
leadership capacities in school communities, and mobilising appropriate resources and
supports.
The works of Hoy and Hoy (2013), Leithwood et al. (2004) and Mulford (2008) reflect the way
that effective leadership is necessary to achieve positive change through (co)creating a shared
vision, improving effectiveness, creating higher standards and building instructional capacity.
Transformational leadership focuses on results and emphasises success (Huber, 2004). The adap-
tation of transformational leadership can help the emirates to meet many modern educational
challenges. This current study investigated the cultural relevance and implications of using the
transformational model of leadership in the context of a Middle Eastern, Muslim nation (the UAE)
based on the conceptual framework of change theory, transformational leadership and cultural
considerations (see Figure 1).

Transformational leadership
In this study, Kouzes and Posners (2002, 2003, 2007) theoretical framework for leadership was
utilised. Their framework evolved from a comprehensive collection of managers memories of
their own most positive leadership experiences, based on five components that closely reflect the
ethos of many modern definitions of a transformational leader. These components are also posi-
tively associated with exemplary leadership that has been shown to correlate well with aspects of
transformational leadership paradigms (Abu-Tineh et al., 2008; Carless, 2001; Ehrhardt, 2008;
Puccio et al., 2006; Slater et al., 2002). Kouzes and Posners dimensions of transformational
leadership include:

 Modelling the way. Leaders must share their personal and professional values with those in
their organisation, serve as role models and set the ethical tone for an organisation.
 Inspiring a shared vision. Leaders must understand peoples hopes and dreams and bring
people together towards common goals; they must be able to communicate these goals
effectively.
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 569

Figure 1. Conceptual framework.

 Challenging the process. Leaders must embrace change and continual improvement. Their
primary contribution is to recognise and nurture the good ideas of others.
 Enabling others to act. Leaders must gradually build trust and enable others to excel, in
addition to nurturing teamwork.
 Encouraging the heart. Leaders must be uplifting and create a culture of celebration and
camaraderie (Ehrhardt, 2008; Kouzes and Posner, 2003, 2007).

Transformational leadership, as developed by Burns (1978), was perceived as a process in


which leaders transform an organisation by increasing the achievement and motivation of their
followers. They establish change through hard work with their followers, who must be motivated
to achieve success (Bass, 1985, 2000). Additionally, change theory, wherein the ability to change is
grounded in knowledge of human behaviour, explains the process whereby organisations can
gradually evolve so that transformational leadership becomes the norm (Burke, 2013).
To grow and survive, organisations must cope with change (Westover, 2010) by recognising
that change needs to occur (i.e. initiation), implementing the change (i.e. implementation) and
cementing the change in place (i.e. institutionalisation) (Wallin, 2010). Change is central to the
goal of transformational leaders, which is to effect positive change in organisations (Burns, 1978).
Additionally, transformational leadership is the bridge for organisational change because it facil-
itates a better relationship between leaders and followers, which can then lead to positive action.
Developed in the West, the transformational leadership paradigm has evolved and become
popular in the Middle East due to the regions focus on development and change (Alsaeedi and
Male, 2013; Rees and Althakhri, 2008), but the question is whether this paradigm has universal
applicability (Bass, 1997). Leadership models tend to be culturally bound (Duchatelet, 1998), so
identifying the impact that culture would have on the transformational model is important in
determining its overall efficacy in educational systems such as the UAEs. Hofstedes dimensions
(1980, 1993) are also relevant in this regard, and Hofstede et al. (2010) have shown that Emirati
cultural values differ profoundly from those of western nations. The question is, then, can the
western values-based transformational leadership model work in the UAE educational context?

Educational change
Behaviours can be interpreted quite differently by people from varied cultures and contexts,
resulting in several approaches to leadership (Huber and West, 2002). Transactional leadership
570 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

approaches prevail in countries that demonstrate strong centralised control structures. As decen-
tralisation occurs, the transformational model becomes more useful and relevant because the focus
shifts from managing processes and administration to leading people and change processes.
Research on transformational leadership has shown it is particularly applicable to educational
change (Huber, 2004; Huber and West, 2002; Mulford, 2008). Leithwood (1992) suggests that
transformational leadership is well suited to education because it helps empower instructors and
gives them hope, optimism and energy, as it defines the mission of how to accomplish goals.

Transformational leaders
Effective transformational leaders influence shared beliefs and values to create a complete and
comprehensive level of change, and are more likely than transactional leaders to take risks and
engender trust (Bass and Avolio, 1990). They also aim to nurture a school culture oriented towards
learning, wherein leaders seek to expand the abilities of the average employee, ways of thinking
and individual ambition (Senge, 1990). In this way, learning becomes a shared responsibility.

Developing change
Developing a change movement is one of the main functions of a transformational leader
(Cameron and Green, 2009). The UAE plans to survive and prosper within a competitive inter-
national market, and change is necessary to do so. Transformational leadership also has an impact
on the psychology of followers. Leaders are committed, press for development and control, and
have enhanced satisfaction (Leithwood et al., 1999).
Within an effective transformational change environment, teachers attitudes change, and they
begin to adhere to regulations because they buy into the change approach and feel empowered
within its aegis (Leithwood et al., 1999; Stewart, 2006). The net effect is an increase in vision
building, meeting of performance expectations, ability to develop consensus and intellectual
stimulation (Leithwood et al., 1999; Stewart, 2006).

Leadership and culture


The literature indicates that global leaders have certain traits (Caligiuri and Tarique, 2012),
including the ability to be less ethnocentric, greater cultural flexibility (Shaffer et al., 2006) and
a high tolerance for ambiguity (Judge et al., 1999). The main problem with transformational
leadership is that different cultures regard effective leadership through varied cultural lenses
(Javidan et al., 2006).
According to Hofstede (1980, 1993) and Hofstede et al. (2010), culture is a set of underlying
assumptions, norms, behaviours and beliefs that are shared by members of a group. Cultural values
are inflexible and unique to various contexts, and thus must be considered within the leadership
framework (Hofstede et al., 2010). Hence, it is preferable to adopt the management style of the
culture rather than attempting to demand that the culture change (Hofstede, 1980, 1993; Hofstede
and Hofstede, 2005; Hofstede et al., 2010).
Hofstede identified five main cultural values through his initial research at IBM between
1967 and 1974. He gathered data from more than 70 countries (including the UAE),
beginning with the 40 countries that had the largest group of respondents. The study was
initially expanded to 50 countries in three regions. Eventually, the following groups were
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 571

added: commercial airline pilots in 23 countries, civil service managers from 14 countries,
students from 23 countries, upmarket consumers from 15 countries and an ill-defined group of
elites from 19 countries (Hofstede, 1980, 1993; Hofstede and Hofstede, 2005). According to
Hofstede et al. (2010), although the study took place years ago, national cultures typically change
so slowly that they are still considered up to date. One caveat exists, however: no studies have
determined if cultural changes are accelerating due to the forces of globalisation. Thus, it is
possible that changes in cultural values have the potential to occur more quickly than previously
believed, and further research is certainly warranted in this area.
All cultural values are measured with the Hofstede Value Survey Module (VSM) and
have scores from 1100, with 100 being the highest (Hofstede, 1980, 1993). Power distance
refers to the acceptance of unequal distribution of power and wealth. At 90, the UAEs
power distance score is very high, meaning that they accept the notion that the boss is
completely in charge. Cultures are also measured in terms of their respect for individualism
or collectivism. The UAEs individualism score of 25 is very low; that is, people act as a
collective and do not expect to be treated as individuals (Hofstede et al., 2010). A society
can also be masculine or feminine. Masculine societies favour assertiveness, while feminine
societies favour caring and compassion (Hofstede, 1980, 1993). The UAEs score of 50
means that neither set of attributes dominates (Hofstede et al., 2010). Uncertainty avoidance
defines the level at which a society feels threatened by uncertain circumstances. The UAEs
score of 80 is very high, and indicates that UAE society favours regulations to lower the
chance of a random incident occurring (Hofstede et al., 2010). Lastly, long-term orientation
refers to the Confucian idea of the search for virtue. It contrasts the long-term orientation of
a nation to those with a short-term, immediate focus, and was added after the original
dimensions in order to identify the differences in thinking between East Asian societies and
the West (Hofstede et al., 2010). This factor has not yet been calculated for the UAE.
Moreover, Hofstedes recent studies conducted with Minkov (Hofstede et al., 2010) have
examined the concept of indulgence or restraint in behaviours as a cultural dimension. This
score has also not been calculated for the UAE, but the majority of Muslim nations exam-
ined to date have been shown to approach life with higher levels of restraint, which is
defined simply as approaching life with strict social controls versus approaching life
indulgently.
From these characteristics, the differences between the UAE and western nations become
clearer. Hence, when considering the potential viability of transformational leadership, as a largely
western construct, it was important to explore how principals and teachers perceived this form of
leadership within a Middle Eastern context.

Purpose of the study


The study aimed to determine how closely school principals in the UAE align with transforma-
tional leadership approaches, and how well teachers accept that style of leadership. Very few
studies have been conducted on the impact of the UAE change agenda, especially using transfor-
mational leadership as the lens for exploration. Determining the efficacy and appropriateness of
transformational leadership in the Middle East within a predominantly Muslim culture was per-
ceived to be informative to scholars and practitioners in other non-western nations or varied
cultural settings.
572 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

Research questions
The following research questions framed the study:

1. How do principals in the UAE align their leadership actions with transformational
leadership?
2. Do teachers and principals perceive that transformational leadership is practised in Emirati
schools?
3. Is transformational leadership relevant to Emirati schools?
4. What factors in the UAE influence how principals enact transformational leadership?

Methodology
A mixed methodological approach of both qualitative and quantitative methods was used follow-
ing a sequential process. By triangulating the results of various data sets, emergent themes could be
compared and legitimised. The research employed a questionnaire, followed by individual, in-
depth semi-structured interviews to obtain more detailed information regarding stakeholders
perceptions of transformational leadership in UAE schools.

Participants
A purposive expert sample of 247 individuals was invited to participate in the research, of which
130 agreed (27 principals and 103 teachers). The population comprised graduate students (all
qualified educators) enrolled in faculties of education in the UAE. These English-proficient
volunteers freely provided their informed consent. The sample attended Abu Dhabi University,
the British University of Dubai, UAE University and Zayed University, all of which consented to
the study. Twenty-seven principals and 103 teachers completed the questionnaire. Sixteen of these
individuals (12 teachers, four principals) participated in follow-up interviews.
The studys expert sample was selected for several reasons. First, it was regarded as fairly
representative of teachers and administrators in the UAE, as all participants were employed for a
minimum of one year in the school system; moreover, they possessed the level of English profi-
ciency required by federal educational authorities (i.e. IELTS band scores between 5.56.5). As
graduate students enrolled in educational administration and leadership programs, they also had
sufficient background knowledge to understand complex subject matter and discuss their opinions
and perceptions of transformational leadership. Additionally, it was assumed that the participants
level of expertise regarding the research topic would affect the overall results in a positive manner,
as these subjects would likely provide a greater level of insight than other individuals in the UAE
school system.
In terms of participant demographics, two principals were male and 25 were female; the
majority were in their mid (n 13 / 48%) or late (n 10 / 37%) careers. Most principals came
from Abu Dhabi (n 12 / 44%), with the second largest group coming from Dubai (n 7 / 26%);
the majority worked in Abu Dhabi (n 12 / 44%) or Dubai (n 10 / 37%). The largest group
supervised primary grade levels (n 11 / 41%), while the second largest group supervised
preparatory or middle levels (n 8 / 30%). Their school leadership experience was fairly evenly
divided.
The vast majority of the teachers were females (n 89 / 86%) who were young (2534 years) (n
39 / 38%) to middle aged (3544 years) (n 35 / 34%). Most came from Abu Dhabi (n 49 / 48%)
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 573

or Dubai (n 23 / 22%), and likewise worked in Abu Dhabi (n 54 / 52%) or Dubai (n 25 / 24%).
The majority taught at the primary (K6) level (n 40 / 39%), with the second largest group
teaching at the secondary level (n 28 / 27%). Their years of experience were fairly evenly divided,
and the majority of the teachers were mid-career (n 32 / 31%). The teachers sample was
demographically very similar to the principals sample.

Instrumentation
Initial data collection in the quantitative phase of the study was conducted using web-based survey
software, with a 30-item English language version of Kouzes and Posners (2002, 2003, 2007)
Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI). The LPI-Observer was used with teachers, and an aligned
LPI-Self questionnaire was used with school leaders; Kouzes Posner International permitted the
use of the instruments. The LPI not only assesses five practices associated with successful lead-
ership, but also identifies and correlates these with transformational leadership traits (Abu-Tineh
et al., 2008; Ehrhardt, 2008; Puccio et al., 2006).
Additionally, Kouzes and Posner (1988, 1993, 2002) examined the psychometric properties of
the LPI, and the instrument has been shown to have strong reliability against measurement errors.
Regarding internal consistency estimates, scores tended to range between .70.85 for the LPI-Self,
and between .81.92 for the LPI-Observer according to Cronbachs alpha measurements in several
US-based studies (Albin, 2008). The LPI has also undergone rigorous testing for reliability and
validity in a variety of non-western settings. Lam (1998), for instance, tested the instrument on
middle managers in Hong Kong. Using factor analysis, the researchers were able to determine
distinct factors that contributed to the findings of the study. Moreover, internal consistency for the
LPI was calculated and resulted in a Cronbachs alpha range of .74.83, which was very similar to
values published by Kouzes and Posner (1988, 1993). Another study concerning higher education
leaders that used a Mongolian version of the LPI reported that the response options of the LPI were
clear and straightforward, and did not reflect American cultural values that could potentially
confuse respondents (Kouzes and Posner, 2002). Finally, an Arabic version of the LPI was tested;
using Cronbachs alpha, the researchers determined that the validity ranged between .77.89,
which is also very similar to the findings of Kouzes and Posner (Abu-Tineh et al., 2008). Thus,
the instrument was deemed to have a high degree of accuracy.
In this case, participants were asked six questions that related to four transformational leader-
ship domains (i.e. Model, Inspire, Challenge, Enable and Encourage), and rated each question on a
10-point Likert-type scale from 1 (Almost Never) to 10 (Almost Always). Each domain had a
possible score range from 6 to 60.

Interviews
The qualitative stage of data collection included semi-structured interviews, allowing for focused,
time-efficient and easy-to-analyse conversations (Patton, 2015). Interviews took place on partici-
pants respective home campuses, were conducted in English and lasted approximately 3040
minutes. In addition, all interviews were recorded, transcribed, coded and analysed. Both princi-
pals and teachers were asked about the change initiatives in their schools. Principals were asked
about their own leadership activities, while teachers were asked about the principals actions and
their impact on the school. Teachers and principals were also invited to report on ways in which
principals inspired a shared vision, challenged the process, enabled others to act, modelled the way
574 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

or encouraged the heart. Finally, participants were invited to discuss the schools organisational
culture, and how transformational leadership approaches could be applied within the current
context of change in the UAE education system. Examples of interview questions included:

 In what ways does your principal (do you) provide your school with a vision of the future?
 In what ways does your principal (do you) encourage teachers to collaborate with each
other?
 In what ways does your principal (do you) take ownership of the educational program?
 In what ways does your principal (do you) model professionalism?
 In what ways does your principal (do you) celebrate success?

Analysis
The transformational leadership practices of the principals were examined by gathering
responses from Kouzes and Posners LPI about the recent school leadership experience of the
participating principals from both their own (LPI-Self) and teachers perceptions (LPI-Obser-
ver). First, statistical analysis was used to summarise the frequency distribution and measures of
central tendency of the LPI instrument. This determined how closely UAE school principals
leadership approaches aligned with conceptualisations of transformational leadership, and the
extent to which transformational leadership is being practised within UAE schools.
The final phase of the research comprised semi-structured interviews. These complimented the
LPI, and provided additional information about the research questions. The interview sample was
divided into two groups: (a) principals and (b) teachers. Each interview was recorded, transcribed,
coded and analysed. The researchers followed an iterative thematic coding approach in the analysis
of qualitative data; the data were segregated, grouped, regrouped and reordered into themes in
order to consolidate meaning and explanation prior to display (Patton, 2015).

Results
Several themes emerged from the study. The most dramatic was the difference in perception of
leadership between the principals and teachers. In general, principals felt that they practised many
aspects of transformational leadership, while teachers disagreed. A summary of the key findings is
presented in the next section.

Model domain
Modelling the way entails leaders understanding their values, beliefs, and assumptions, and being
honest about the principles that influence their actions and approaches (Kouzes and Posner, 2003:
18). Many of the principals believed that they modelled the way for staff, as evidenced by their
higher agreement rates (shown in Figure 2) than those of teachers, who felt that principals mod-
elled the way only occasionally.
Most principals felt that being the best at their job and setting an example were the most
important factors in their leadership. Teachers felt that principals should have high expectations
and set examples, but indicated that many were in fact unprofessional. With respect to the con-
textual/cultural applicability of modelling the way, principals responses alluded to the importance
of modelling best practices in an educational setting that is increasingly characterised by
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 575

Figure 2. Model domain: Perceptions of teachers and principals.

significant change and policy implementation; however, they also emphasised the continued pre-
valence of top-down approaches. Most teachers reiterated that this was not being practised.
As can be seen from the qualitative data, one principal focused on the personal presentation
aspect of professionalism. A kandura is a traditional form of Arabic male clothing:

A nice pressed kandura every day. I wear a nice suit when I have to go to travel in Europe, America. I
look good . . . I expect my teachers also to wear nice, good clothes, and students to wear their uniform
outfits every day with care. I arrive on time. I send e-mails. I keep on top of things. I have regular
meetings and these sorts of things. I try to walk around and drop in from time-to-time to see whats
going on. I think all of these things are a good way to model professionalism.

One of the teachers explained the significance of setting high expectations:

She always had high performance expectations . . . you know she expected that. But I think where she
lacked . . . I dont know if she sometimes, you know whether the principals are sometimes qualified
enough sometimes to understand what it takes. For example, she may not have had enough knowledge
about certain subjects . . . or even the methodologies of education, of how teachers are supposed to teach.

Some participants even described their principals as unprofessional and hence unable to model
the way:
576 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

Figure 3. Inspire domain: Perceptions of teachers and principals.

I think what my principal does is actually bringing down the level of professionalism. Because of the
way he interacts with the workers, other people in the administration and leadership positions assume
its okay to act the same way.

Inspire domain
Principals believed that they inspired their teachers, whereas teachers generally did not agree.
This difference is reflected in Figure 3, and also emerged in the interviews. For example, one
principal stated:

We have meetings and we talk about our goals and why its important, and I try to give them
support . . . we can tell them what we want and then help them to join us.

While some teachers agreed that principals had meetings, they also stated that the principals
vision and implementation were inconsistent.

He talks the talk but he doesnt [walk the walk] what he says to one group of people its different
from another, so then when theyre trying to collaborate in reaching whatever the common goal is,
people dont really know what the common goal is, because hes just been inconsistent in his message.
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 577

Figure 4. Challenge domain: Perceptions of teachers and principals.

In terms of the cultural/contextual applicability of inspiring a shared vision, principals indi-


cated the importance of working collaboratively and preparing for the future; however, some also
suggested that this notion was western-based. Teachers provided several themes for assessing the
contextual/cultural applicability of inspiring a shared vision, the most significant being that the
notion was new to the UAE and not necessarily applicable to the current educational context.

Challenge domain
Figure 4 displays the difference in agreement for items related to challenging the process,
whereby principals responses demonstrated greater agreement than teachers.
Principals accounts revealed the importance of professional development, maintaining
accountability, setting a good example and achieving results. For example, one principal said:
Im always telling the teachers to learn new things and do professional development. We give
them time to do that. These principals indicated that professional development was important in
challenging old and out-dated practices. Alternatively, teachers indicated that principals did not
take ownership of decisions and stressed the importance of recognition and feedback, as well as
the fact that controlled freedom and authoritative leadership were the norm. With respect to the
contextual/cultural applicability of challenging the process, principals highlighted the
578 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

Figure 5. Enable domain: Perceptions of teachers and principals.

significance of achieving results, continuous performance assessment and utilising a top-down


approach. Teachers stated that the emergence of this domain would take time, that leadership
remains authority-based and that autonomy is important when trying new things. Once again, there
was some conflict between teacher and principal perspectives. Nevertheless, despite this difference
in rate of agreement, one teacher spoke about engaging in professional development to improve the
conditions of the school:

Everyone in the school, were taking workshops and we all have professional development every week.
Before, we never had this . . . Some of it is for pedagogy, but also some for individual skills for
computers and information technology . . . Also, they are providing us with classes on some leadership
and other things like this.

Enable domain
There were differences between principals and teachers perceptions of principals capacities to
enable their staff to act (see Figure 5).
Some principals indicated they were open to collaboration, suggestions, utilising committees
and staff meetings, promoting extra-curricular activities and fostering a caring, trusting and sup-
portive work environment. Teachers stated that they believed in the significance of collaboration,
meetings and team building, as well as the importance of providing some freedom, but expressed
concern about the lack of encouragement from principals. They also stressed how some principals
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 579

approaches fostered competitiveness rather than a collaborative and caring work environment. In
terms of the contextual/cultural applicability of enabling others to act, principals emphasised the
need to continue the practice of a transactional relationship in the workplace, the involvement of
experts from other countries and collaboration. Teachers believed that this domain was not being
implemented, and stressed the necessity of modifications to western leadership models, further
training and gradual long-term implementation. None of them agreed with the principals.
One principals comments were representative. He felt that by listening to the teachers, he was
enabling them to develop and do their jobs. However, his comments reflect a more conservative
view of leadership:

Well, respect is important. They respect me; I respect them. They must respect the boss, of course.
Sure, its important. You have to have a hierarchal structure in organisations. But it is a two-way street.
I listen. Im open. My door is always open. I love to sit and have tea and chat with my teachers.
Sometimes we have lunch . . . Sometimes staff meetings are very good. I think these are some things
that I do.

Teachers disagreed somewhat, however, stressing that they did not feel the principal had the
same definition of collaboration that teachers expect:

. . . and its often not done in a voluntary way; its done in a mandated way that is not necessarily
respected or appreciated by the staff. So the collaboration exists, but not in a its not again done in a
very positive sense.

Encourage domain
The difference between principals and teachers responses remained consistent in this domain,
where principals rated themselves more highly than teachers (see Figure 6).
Principals believed they encouraged subordinates regularly by treating them as family, pro-
viding excellent services, being open and utilising rewards. Teachers indicated that their princi-
pals offered commendations in private and facilitated after-school activities, daily interaction
and team empowerment. However, some suggested that school leaders sometimes relied on
intimidation, lacked encouragement or were inconsistent in their leadership styles. Both groups
felt that principals used celebrations and ceremonies as a primary form of encouragement. In
terms of the contextual/cultural applicability of the encouraging the heart domain, several
relevant themes emerged. For example, some principals spoke about the fast-paced and com-
petitive nature of the UAE and the need for effective ideas, planning, motivation and positive
attitudes toward teaching. Alternatively, teachers stressed the need for trusted leadership, hard
work and coordination.
Interestingly, some teachers reported feeling encouraged, and most principals felt that they
were very encouraging. Both teachers and principals reflected the greatest awareness of change
in the encourage domain, whether it was required to keep up with the information age and a new
way of doing things, or whether it was a need for internal change. For example, one principal
commented that:

Were a changing country, so we need to move fast with good leaders, and we need to have good ideas
and to let everyone know that were all working together and that were building a country.
580 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

Figure 6. Encourage domain: Perceptions of teachers and principals.

Teachers echoed this sentiment, with one stating:

Were already changing and trying to be as innovative as possible by bringing in teachers from foreign
countries and tailoring the education system and improving the education system by watching standards.

Nearly all principals and teachers spoke of the need to recognise people at the end of the year
(including the students) and to maintain a family atmosphere (encouraging the heart) by having
dinners, lunches and celebrations.

Discussion
The most significant finding was that teachers and principals opinions differed considerably with
regard to what type of leadership was in evidence and what was being accomplished in their
schools. Principals believed they were utilising transformational leadership while teachers dis-
agreed. Some notable points of alignment between principals and teachers were that various forms
of collaboration (e.g. meetings) enabled and inspired teachers, professional development oppor-
tunities challenged teachers, and parties and ceremonies were used to encourage. However, teach-
ers reported that they only occasionally felt enabled, inspired, challenged or encouraged.
The findings underscored the contentions in the literature regarding the divergence between princi-
pals and teachers perceptions concerning transformational leadership; however, the literature does not
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 581

always offer clear indications as to why this phenomenon occurs. One explanation could be the unique
culture of the UAE, which makes transformational leadership difficult for teachers to receive. The
literature indicates that cultural value orientation has an impact on how transformational leadership will
be received and perceived by followers, underscoring the possible culture-sensitive nature of transfor-
mational leadership (Walumbwa et al., 2007). Another curious finding was that participants believed
that transformational leadership could work in the UAE, but alluded to the fact that top-down and
transactional approaches remained prevalent, and that modifications to leadership approaches would
need to be made with respect to the local culture and context, both in terms of the community and school.
In terms of the principals actual practice of transformational leadership, some participants
believed that inspiring a shared vision was applicable in the UAE; this was consistent with
Hofstedes findings on the collectivist nature of UAE culture, and endorsed by the fact that both
stakeholder groups felt that group meetings were an essential component in creating a shared
vision. As such, having a shared vision appeared to be an important part of the transformational
model, and highly applicable to the UAE educational environment. In enabling others to act,
principals indicated their openness to suggestions and collaboration, but typically did not accept
ownership of some decisions. Similarly, many teachers felt uncomfortable approaching principals
with ideas, as this may be discouraged in top-down, hierarchical educational contexts. Thus, as the
change process begins, it might be more appropriate to use a transactional technique in this domain
and then gradually transition into transformational leadership approaches.
In this study, professional development, accountability, setting a good example and achieving
results were examples of actions that enabled principals to challenge the process. The findings
showed that principals also felt that setting the best examples for teachers modelled the way. This
was consistent with some of the literature on transformational leadership; however, it was a limited
perspective within this dimension. Additionally, principals encouraged teachers hearts by recog-
nising successes through parties, celebrations and ceremonies, and teachers and principals
accounts aligned in this aspect despite teachers feeling that their leaders could do more.
In summation, although transactional leadership was still utilised in some contexts, the findings were
consistent with transformational leadership, albeit limited in some schools. Principals practised both
transactional and transformational leadership, aligning with Bass and Avolios (2000) assertion that the
two models are not mutually exclusive. Furthermore, the findings showed that transformational lead-
ership could be utilised in Middle Eastern nations, but adaptations to the model are advisable for the best
impact and outcomes. Moreover, the findings indicated that transactional leadership is more prevalent
in the UAE than transformational leadership, and that principals believed they were practising trans-
formational leadership to a greater extent than teachers felt to be the case. This disparity may have
resulted from the teachers cultural value orientation (i.e. their discomfort with some transformational
aspects of their principals leadership). It may also have been an issue of human nature, where princi-
pals self-reports were skewed in favour of their preferred form of leadership. Another possible expla-
nation could be that teachers were largely unaware of what principals were doing on a day-to-day basis;
hence, teachers perceptions were skewed. Alternatively, either stakeholder group may have had mis-
conceptions or lacked knowledge about transformational leadership models and approaches, which
would have implications for the accuracy of their judgments of principals actions.

Implications for leadership


Transformational leadership is a viable model of leadership for the UAE, but the findings indicate
that modifications must be made to account for cultural differences, which influence perception
582 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

and behaviour. In addition, transactional leadership remains prevalent throughout Emirati society;
however, with effort and awareness, this can gradually shift to more transformational orientations,
a process that has already commenced. Since transactional and transformational leadership have
been shown to complement each other, leaders may be able to balance the two leadership styles. It
appears that UAE school leaders may intend to make transformational leadership more dominant
without abandoning some of the older practices that were readily accepted in this cultural setting
and consistent with transactional leadership. Finally, the discrepancies in perceptions could be
explained by the prevailing educational culture, which tends to expect leaders to be authoritative
rather than respectful of, and consultative with, teachers. Due to differences in perception between
teachers and principals, principals may need to be more explicit with their transformational
leadership approaches in order to communicate their vision to teachers. However, simultaneously,
teachers must be slowly introduced to the necessary changes and to the concept of a school culture
that differs from the prevailing national or local culture. Moreover, principals must become more
aware of the impact of social and religious culture on their schools, particularly among teachers,
who were all from the UAE, but varied in terms of their home emirate and whether they hailed
from rural or urban locations.
Transformational leadership is not yet widely accepted in UAE schools. While some
aspects of transformational leadership are practised, such as fostering collaboration, promot-
ing professional development, having a shared vision, and encouraging success and achieve-
ments, others are not; most principals continue to rely on hierarchical approaches while
attempting to be culturally and emotionally more receptive than in the past. Communicating
change in an open and informed way, allowing feedback and adding professional development
specifically related to the transformational process for teachers is a positive first step towards
institutionalising this leadership approach. However, it is important to note that although some
aspects of transformational leadership are seen in virtually all cultures and that the concept
generally remains identical everywhere, its incarnation may vary between societies, and
specific models might not be entirely applicable in every context. As such, it is essential
to incorporate local norms, customs, etc. into any future school leadership development
program in the UAE.

Introducing the cross-cultural transformational leadership model


The findings from this research led us to create a modified model of transformational leadership:
the Cross-cultural Transformational Leadership Model (see Figure 7). The model was developed
not only for use in the UAE, but in other developing nations as well, particularly those that have a
predominantly Muslim culture.
The proposed model reflects four facets. The first facet involves accepting unique and enshrined
cultural factors, such as traditional inclinations towards collectivism, top-down (i.e. hierarchal)
supervision, the upholding of existing working (i.e. transactional) relationships and avoiding the
uncertainty of untried or unknown outcomes (Hofstede et al., 2010) that may impact the models
implementation, particularly with respect to its adaptation to Islamic culture. The second facet,
challenge the process, relies on Kouzes and Posners original construct; however, the proposed
model greatly expands on the notion of challenging the process (i.e. challenging the status quo) as
it represents a positive springboard for change. It includes aspects such as setting good examples,
acknowledging and celebrating staff efforts and achievements, establishing more transparent
teacher accountability, professional development, providing and accepting feedback, promoting
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 583

Figure 7. Proposed cross-cultural transformational model.

collaboration, and achieving results. All of these aspects currently exist in UAE schools, but not all
are well understood and/or consistently practised. If school leaders and senior administrators
continue to build upon these characteristics, a more successful, effective and positive form of
transformational leadership may ultimately develop. Once this occurs, the necessary leadership
conditions will be in place, and meaningful educational change can consistently occur through
innovation.

Recommendations
The UAE government has established change through innovation as a primary goal of the
educational system. An inherent premise is that failure is not an option in the globalising context
of the Middle East. Thus, the UAE will support innovations that drive positive change to ensure
their agenda is successful. As such, three recommendations for further research are proposed. First,
there is a need to expand the research on transformational leadership in non-western contexts in
order to obtain a deeper understanding of the implications of culture on leadership approaches. For
example, the complementary nature of transactional leadership and transformational leadership in
the UAE could be examined to understand the prevalence of each leadership style in this context.
Second, the results of this study should be expanded to encompass explorations related to dis-
crepancies in perception regarding leadership that exist between teachers and principals in the
UAE. The results show that teachers tend to perceive principals as not practising transformational
leadership effectively. Large-scale longitudinal and qualitative studies, as well as grounded
approaches, could expand upon the findings, and subsequently extend the literature concerning
the practice and applicability of transformational leadership in non-western settings. Third, further
research ought to be conducted regarding leadership from the perspective of cross-cultural lead-
ership in the UAE and other Arab nations, as well as on the implementation and impact of the
proposed cross-cultural transformational leadership model. By examining the applicability of
transformational leadership in the entire region, the study results could be placed within a larger
context. Examining transformational leadership in various cultural settings, particularly in non-
western cultures, is a necessary aspect of improving overall understandings of the theoretical
foundations of transformational leadership.
584 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

Conclusion
The overriding conclusion of the paper is that one size (or leadership approach), no matter how
worthy, does not fit all cultures. Thus, while the concept of transformational leadership allows for a
great deal of flexibility, contemporary and contextualised models need to be adapted for Islamic
nations. Effecting positive change in Emirati schools will be a challenge, as it is in most schools;
however, it is possible to meet that challenge by devising a transformational leadership approach
that will encourage and promote change and innovation, while also respecting and retaining the
unique cultural nuances and needs of the organisation within the national culture.
Rigidly applying rules, expecting obedience and displaying uncertainty towards reform may be
part of the UAEs overall culture; nevertheless, it negatively impacts school cultures and school
change initiatives. Therefore, leadership must be distributed among the levels of education, and
teachers should be given a stake in the outcome in order to empower and motivate them to engage
in the change agenda. Changing the culture of the school and beyond that, the school system, will
allow change to develop within the school setting itself. Encouraging teachers to adapt to new and
emerging leadership styles will inevitably be difficult; however, by placing emphasis on gradually
modifying the organisational culture and context with full participation and transparency, teachers
will most likely engage in the process and evolve with the changes expected of them.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests


The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or
publication of this article.

Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit
sectors.

References
Abu Dhabi Education Council (2012) Abu Dhabi education reform: The road to 2030. Government of Abu
Dhabi. Available at: http://centres.insead.edu/innovation-policy/events/policy-breakfasts/documents/ad_
edu_ref_pres-2012april.pdf (accessed 28 September 2015).
Abu-Tineh AM, Khasawneh SA and Al-Omari A (2008) Transformational leadership model in practice: The
case of Jordanian schools. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 29(8): 648660.
Al-Amiri AM (2012) The role of national policies and legislation in the development of education systems. In:
Essentials of School Education in the United Arab Emirates. Abu Dhabi: The Emirates Center for
Strategic Studies and Research, pp.1956.
Albin GR (2008) Evaluating the reliability and validity of the leadership managerial audit questionnaire.
Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Al-Fahim M (2006) From Rags to Riches: A Story of Abu Dhabi. London: London Centre of Arab Studies.
Alsaeedi F and Male T (2013) Transformational leadership and globalization: Attitudes of school principals in
Kuwait. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 41(5): 640657.
Baker F and Blaik-Hourani R (2014) The nature of parental involvement in the city of Abu Dhabi in a context
of change: Nurturing mutually responsive practice. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary
Middle Eastern Issues 7(4): 186200.
Bass BM (1985) Leadership Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Academic Press.
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 585

Bass BM (1997) Does the transactionaltransformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and
national boundaries? American Psychologist 52(2): 130139.
Bass BM (2000) The future of leadership in learning organizations. Journal of Leadership and Organizational
Studies 7: 1840.
Bass BM and Avolio BJ (1990) Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor
Leadership Questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Bass BM and Avolio BJ (2000) Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mindgarden.
Brown LM and Morrison MB (2012) Integrating the old with the new: Cultural intelligence and
transformational leadership for an interdependent world. International Leadership Journal 4(2):
6171.
Burden-Leahy S (2009) Globalization and education in the postcolonial world: The conundrum of the higher
education system of the United Arab Emirates. Comparative Education 45(4): 525544.
Burke WW (2013) Organization Change: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Burns JM (1978) Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.
Caligiuri P and Tarique I (2012) Dynamic cross-cultural competencies and global leadership effectiveness.
Journal of World Business 47: 612622.
Cameron E and Green M (2009) Making Sense of Change Management (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
Carless SA (2001) Assessing the discriminant validity of the Leadership Practices Inventory. Journal of
Occupational and Organizational Psychology 74(2): 233239.
CIA (2015) United Arab Emirates. Available at: www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/
ae.html (accessed 5 March 2015).
Duchatelet M (1998) Cultural diversity and management/leadership models. American Business Review
16(2): 9699.
Ehrhardt MA (2008) Teacher views of international school principal leadership. Unpublished PhD Thesis,
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Gaad E, Arif M and Fentey S (2004) Systems analysis of the UAE education system. International Journal of
Educational Management 20(4): 291303.
Hofstede G (1980) Motivation, leadership and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organiza-
tional Dynamics 9(1): 4263.
Hofstede G (1993) Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Executive 7(1):
8194.
Hofstede G and Hofstede GJ (2005) Cultures and Organizations: Software for the Mind. New York: McGraw-
Hill.
Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ and Minkov M (2010) Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.).
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hoy A and Hoy WK (2013) Instructional Leadership. A Research-based Guide to Learning in Schools. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Huber S (2004) School leadership and leadership development: Adjusting leadership theories and develop-
ment programs to values and core purposes of school. Journal of Educational Administration 42(6):
669684.
Huber S and West M (2002) Developing school leaders: A critical review of current practices, approaches
and issues and some directions for the future. In: Leithwood K and Hallinger P (eds) Second Interna-
tional Handbook on Educational Leadership and Administration. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub-
lishers, pp. 10711101.
Javidan M, Dorfman PW, de Luque MS and House RJ (2006) In the eye of the beholder: Cross-cultural
lessons in leadership from Project GLOBE. Academy of Management Perspectives 20(1): 6790.
586 Educational Management Administration & Leadership 45(4)

Judge T, Thoresen C, Pucik V and Welbourne T (1999) Managerial coping with organizational change: A
dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 84(1): 107122.
Kouzes J and Posner B (1988) The Leadership Practices Inventory. San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer.
Kouzes JM and Posner BZ (1993) Psychometric properties of the leadership practices inventory updated.
Educational and Psychological Measurement 53(1): 191199.
Kouzes JM and Posner BZ (2002) Leadership practices inventory: Theory and evidence behind the five
practices of exemplary leadership. Available at http://media.wiley.com/assets/463/74/lc/_jb_appendix.pdf
(accessed 30 October 2014).
Kouzes JM and Posner BZ (2003) The Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI): Observer (3rd ed.). San
Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Kouzes JM and Posner BZ (2007) The Leadership Challenge (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and
Sons.
Lam S (1998) An assessment of the reliability and validity of the leadership practices inventory in Hong
Kong. International Journal of Management 15(1): 5759.
Leithwood K (1992) The move toward transformational leadership. Educational Leadership 49(5): 812.
Leithwood K and Jantzi D (2006) Transformational leadership for large scale reform: Effects on stu-
dents, teachers and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 17(2):
201227.
Leithwood K, Jantzi D and Steinbach R (1999) Changing Leadership for Changing Times. Buckingham:
Open University Press.
Leithwood K, Seashore Louis K, Anderson S and Wahlstrom K (2004) How Leadership Influences Student
Learning. New York: Wallace Foundation.
Lewis K and Bardsley D (2008) Education reform to take five years. The National. 29 April. Available at:
http://www.thenational.ae (accessed 20 March 2015).
Macpherson R, Kachelhoffer P and El Nemr M (2007) The radical modernization of school and education
system leadership in the United Arab Emirates: Towards indigenized and educative leadership. Interna-
tional Studies in Educational Administration 35(1): 6077.
Mulford W (2008) The Leadership Challenge: Improving Learning in Schools. Melbourne: Australian Coun-
cil for Educational Research.
Patton M (2015) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Publications.
Puccio DGJ, Murdock MC and Mance M (2006) Creative Leadership: Skills that Drive Change. Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Rees CJ and Althakhri R (2008) Organizational change strategies in the Arab region: A review of critical
factors. Journal of Business Economics and Management 9(2): 123132.
Ridge N (2009) In education we must learn from our mistakes. The National, 19 February. Available at: http://
www.thenational.ae (accessed 30 May 2015).
Senge PM (1990) The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Century
Business.
Shaffer M, Harrison D, Gregersen H and Black S (2006) You can take it with you: Individual differences and
expatriate effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(1): 109125.
Slater CL, Boone M, Price L, Martinez D, Alvarez I and Topete C (2002) A cross-cultural investigation of
leadership in the United States and Mexico. School Leadership and Management 22(2): 197209.
Stewart J (2006) Transformational leadership: An evolving concept examined through the works of
Burns, Bass, Avolio and Leithwood. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy
54(26): 129.
Litz and Scott: Transformational leadership in the educational system of the United Arab Emirates 587

Stringer P and Hourani RB (2015) Transformation of roles and responsibilities of principals in times of
change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 44(2): 224246.
Thorne C (2011) The impact of educational reforms on the work of the school principal in the United Arab
Emirates. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 39(2): 172185.
Wallin DL (2010) Looking to the future: Change leaders for tomorrows community colleges. New Directions
for Community Colleges 149: 512.
Walumbwa FO, Lawler JJ and Avolio BJ (2007) Leadership, individual differences and work-related atti-
tudes: A cross-culture investigation. Applied Psychology. An International Review 56: 212230.
Westover JH (2010) Managing organizational change: Change agent strategies and techniques to successfully
managing the dynamics of stability and change in organizations. The International Journal of Manage-
ment and Innovation 2: 4550.
Zaman S (2012) Public school teachers to gain English language proficiency: New program will help support
the teaching of subjects in the English language. Gulf News, 7 October. Available at: http://gulfnews.com
(accessed 30 November 2015).

Author biographies
David Litz is an Assistant Professor at Emirates College for Advanced Education (ECAE) where
he teaches courses in the Culture, Society and Linguistics and Educational Policy Divisions. He
has also previously taught in South Korea and Canada. He holds an EdD from the University of
Calgary and his research interests include comparative education, educational administration and
leadership, as well as educational policy and development in the MENA region.

Shelleyann Scott is the Associate Dean, Professional and Community Engagement, Werklund
School of Education, University of Calgary. Dr. Scott has work experience in education, govern-
ment and business contexts, and she has published in a wide array of books and peer-reviewed
journals. Her research interests include capacity building for individual and organizational effec-
tiveness, leadership development, the use of ICT to support ongoing reflection and learning,
instructional strategies, and student assessment.