Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
201402677 Communications
NMR-based investigations of large protein complexes require A major contribution to protein NMR methods arises from in-
optimized isotopic labeling schemes. We report new methods troducing 2H, 13C, and 15N at specific positions in the amino
to introduce stable isotopes into tryptophan residues; these acid sequences. These specifically positioned stable isotopes
are fine-tuned to the requirements of the particular protein lead to reduced spectral complexity and increased signal reso-
NMR experiment. Selective backbone labeling was performed lution, because of optimization of magnetization transfer path-
by using a new a-ketoacid precursor as an additive in cell- ways. Methods of protein isotope labeling are available for
based overexpression media. Additionally, we developed syn- both aliphatic and aromatic residues.[6] Despite the prominent
thetic routes to certain isotopologues of indole with 13C1H role of tryptophan in protein structure and function, reports
spin systems surrounded by 12C and 2H. The corresponding on selective labeling of this residue are scarce. Most describe
proteins, overexpressed in the presence of these precursor direct additions of the labeled amino acid in cell-free[7] or cell-
compounds, can be effectively analyzed for conformational based expression systems.[8] High cost and effort is associated
changes in tryptophan residues in response to external stimuli, with synthesized labeled chiral tryptophan, and partial degra-
such as interaction with other proteins or small molecules. dation by tryptophanase[9] or tryptophan transaminase[10] leads
to considerable isotope scrambling in the metabolic pathway
of an overexpressing organism (e.g., Escherichia coli).[11]
Nearly all cellular processes are guided and regulated
by the interactions of proteins with other proteins,
nucleic acids, or small ligands. However, only a small
subset of particular residues account for most of the
protein interfaces free energy of binding.[1] Alanine
scanning mutagenesis revealed tryptophan to be the
most frequent residue on the surface of these hot-
spots.[2] This high degree of conservation at protein
binding sites can be explained by the unique ability
of the tryptophan side chain to contribute to aromat-
ic interactions, act as a hydrogen donor, and provide
large hydrophobic areas to shield cavities from exter-
nal solvent molecules. The exact position and motion
of the bulky tryptophan side chain is thus crucial to
understand the molecular processes at protein inter-
action surfaces.
NMR spectroscopy is the method of choice not
only to elucidate the structure of proteins[3] but also
to analyze the dynamic motion of specific side chains
at atomic resolution.[4] Additionally, NMR-based
ligand-screening methods are becoming increasingly Scheme 1. Tailor-made tryptophan precursors for selective 15N, 13C, and 2H labeling in
important in drug identification and development.[5] cell-based protein overexpression systems.
ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 746 751 746 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Communications
100 mg L1 (Figure 1 C). It is worth mentioning that we ob- acetonitrile 14 by reaction with paraformaldehyde,[19] and sub-
served 80 % tryptophan labeling even at precursor concentra- sequent conversion with thionylchloride gave [1-13C]chloro-
tions as low as 20 mg L1. No crosslabeling to other amino acetonitrile 15. This compound was used for the acylation of
acids was observed (Figure 1 B); this validates our use of this aniline hydrochloride to form the target precursor 17. Indoles
labeling approach for ligand screening and optimization with 12 and 17 were used in different concentrations to label His-
diverse target proteins in future studies. tag GB1 (Figure 2 A and B). The normalized signal intensities in
15
Because of economic considerations in a synthetic effort, we N HSQC and HMBC spectra were analyzed in order to mea-
chose indole as a precursor to install specific isotope patterns sure the amount of indole precursor needed to achieve quanti-
in the tryptophan side chain. Indole is converted into trypto- tative tryptophan labeling (Supporting Information). The result-
phan in vivo by tryptophan synthase[14] and has been used in ing saturation curve reveals a steep rise in the relative
protein overexpression.[15] As the compound is easily exported 15
N HSQC signal intensity over a low concentration range (1
ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 746 751 www.chembiochem.org 747 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Communications
10 mg L1), thus proving highly effective uptake of 12 by E. coli but also because of the low concentrations required to achieve
(Figure 2 C). high isotope incorporation.
Encouraged by these results, we aimed for the synthesis of In a first application, [4,6-13C2]-5,7-dideuterioindole 3 was
the more elaborate precursors 2 and 3 (Scheme 4), which fea- added to the growth medium of E. coli overexpressing CspA
ture an isolated side-chain 13C1H spin system in an otherwise (cold-shock protein). CspA functions as an RNA chaperone and
highly deuterated environment. Alternating 12C13C12C and/or is produced by E. coli in response to cold stress. The interaction
2
H1H2H isotope sequences have been shown to be of high of CspA with the 5-untranslated region (5-UTR) of its own
value for probing side-chain dynamics in the case of tyrosine mRNA (cold-box RNA) is mainly guided by phenylalanines on
and phenylalanine residues, because of the significant reduc- the surface of the b-barrel structure.[23] The corresponding
tion in scalar and dipolar couplings.[20] Several synthetic routes 13
C HSQC spectrum of the purified protein (Figure 4 A; details
have been reported for the synthesis of 13C- and 2H-labeled in the Supporting Information) again revealed selective label-
indole or tryptophan,[21] but few describe multilabeling in the ing at the single tryptophan residue of CspA. Addition of an
benzene ring. We started our route to the 13C/2H-indole precur- RNA ligand that has been shown to bind to CspA[24] (5-UTR of
sor compounds from labeled aniline hydrochlorides 19 and 22, the anti-cold-box, partly complementary to the cold-box RNA)
which are accessible from labeled acetones 18 and 21 in five resulted in significant differences in chemical shifts and a de-
and four steps, respectively, by a synthetic approach for the crease in peak intensities (Figure 4 B). These preliminary results
synthesis of phenylalanine and tyrosine precursors confirm that the side chain of Trp11 is within the RNA binding
(Scheme 4).[22] The following acylations (19!20 and 22!23) site on the surface of the protein and is clearly influenced by
and subsequent reductive cyclizations to indoles 2 and 3 were ligand binding. The introduced stable isotope pattern sets the
performed by following a known protocol.[18] stage for further kinetic analysis of the binding process, for
The 1H NMR spectra of the differently isotope-labeled in- example, CarrPurcellMeiboomGill (CPMG) relaxation disper-
doles 2, 3, 12, and 17 in [D6]DMSO were compared (Figure 3). sion experiments, which have been performed at other resi-
The spectral data revealed accurate isotope distribution and dues to determine the sparsely populated states of CspA-RNA
showed the expected heteronuclear coupling constants. These complexation.[24]
compounds are highly economic Trp precursors, not only be- In summary, we have developed two complementary trypto-
cause of the low-cost isotope sources used in the synthesis, phan-labeling methods. The first uses [1-13C]indolepyruvate 1
ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 746 751 www.chembiochem.org 748 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Communications
ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 746 751 www.chembiochem.org 749 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Communications
[1] I. S. Moreira, P. A. Fernandes, M. J. Ramos, Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinf.
2007, 68, 803 812.
[2] A. A. Bogan, K. S. Thorn, J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 280, 1 9.
[3] a) L. E. Kay, J. Magn. Reson. 2005, 173, 193 207; b) L. E. Kay, K. H. Gard-
ner, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1997, 7, 722 731; c) V. Tugarinov, L. E. Kay,
ChemBioChem 2005, 6, 1567 1577; d) C. Gbl, T. Madl, B. Simon, M. Sat-
tler, Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2014, 80, 26 63.
[4] a) A. J. Wand, Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8, 926 931; b) L. E. Kay, Nat. Struct.
Biol. 1998, 5, 513 517; c) R. Rosenzweig, L. E. Kay, Annu. Rev. Biochem.
2014, 83, 291 315.
[5] a) B. Meyer, T. Peters, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 864 890; Angew.
Chem. 2003, 115, 890 918; b) J. Weigelt, M. van Dongen, J. Uppenberg,
J. Schultz, M. Wikstrm, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2446 2447.
[6] a) K. H. Gardner, L. E. Kay, Annu. Rev. Biomol. Struct. 1998, 27, 357 406;
b) V. Tugarinov, P. M. Hwang, L. E. Kay, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2004, 73,
107 146; c) V. Tugarinov, V. Kanelis, L. E. Kay, Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 749
754; d) C. G. Hoogstraten, J. E. Johnson, Jr., Concept Magn. Res. Part A
2008, 32A, 34 55; e) N. K. Goto, L. E. Kay, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000,
10, 585 592.
[7] a) M. Kainosho, T. Torizawa, Y. Iwashita, T. Terauchi, A. M. Ono, P. Gntert,
Nature 2006, 440, 52 57; b) Y. Miyanoiri, M. Takeda, J. Jee, A. M. Ono, K.
Okuma, T. Terauchi, M. Kainosho, J. Biomol. NMR 2011, 51, 425 435.
[8] C. Berger, J. T. C. Ho, T. Kimura, S. Hess, K. Gawrisch, A. Yeliseev, Protein
Expression Purif. 2010, 70, 236 247.
[9] S.-Y. Ku, P. Yip, P. L. Howell, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 2006, 62, 814 823.
[10] C. Mavrides, W. Orr, J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 4128 4133.
[11] C. Berger, S. Berndt, A. Pichert, S. Theisgen, D. Huster, Biotechnol.
Bioeng. 2013, 110, 1681 1690.
[12] a) N. K. Goto, K. H. Gardner, G. A. Mueller, R. C. Willis, L. E. Kay, J. Biomol.
NMR 1999, 13, 369 374; b) V. Tugarinov, L. E. Kay, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2003, 125, 13868 13878; c) R. Lichtenecker, M. L. Ludwiczek, W.
Schmid, R. Konrat, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5348 5349; d) R. J. Lich-
tenecker, K. Weinhupl, W. Schmid, R. Konrat, J. Biomol. NMR 2013, 57,
327 331.
[13] R. J. Lichtenecker, N. Coudevylle, R. Konrat, W. Schmid, ChemBioChem
2013, 14, 818 821.
[14] M. F. Dunn, D. Niks, H. Ngo, T. R. M. Barends, I. Schlichting, Trends Bio-
chem. Sci. 2008, 33, 254 264.
Scheme 5. Synthetic approach to prepare the phenylalanine precursors 24 [15] a) R. A. Rodriguez-Mias, M. Pellecchia, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
and 25,[22] tyrosine precursor 26,[22] and tryptophan precursors 2 and 3 via 2892 2893; b) T. Tarrag, B. Claasen, N. Kichik, R. A. Rodriguez-Mias, M.
anilines 19 and 22. Gair, E. Giralt, ChemBioChem 2009, 10, 2736 2739.
[16] a) K. Kawamura-Sato, K. Shibayama, T. Horii, Y. Iimuma, Y. Arakawa, M.
Ohta, FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1999, 179, 345 352; b) S. Piero-Fernandez,
C. Chimerel, U. F. Keyser, D. K. Summers, J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 1793
pling, have been presented recently.[25] Our synthetic concept 1798.
will help to transfer these methods to applications concerning [17] J. D. DeSousa, B. M. Novak, ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 672 675.
the tryptophan side chain, and the corresponding studies con- [18] C. A. B. Wager, S. A. Miller, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm. 2006, 49,
615 622.
stitute an important part of our ongoing research. [19] C. S. Elmore, D. C. Dean, Y. Zhang, D. G. Mellilo, J. Labelled Compd. Radi-
opharm. 2004, 47, 837 846.
[20] V. Kasinath, K. G. Valentine, A. J. Wand, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135,
Experimental Section 9560 9563.
[21] a) E. M. M. van den Berg, A. U. Baldew, A. T. J. W. de Goede, J. Raap, J.
Spectroscopic characterization of all products and intermediates
Lugtenburg, Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1988, 107, 73 81; b) E. M. M. van
and experimental details for protein overexpression and NMR spec-
den Berg, W. B. S. van Liemt, B. Heemskerk, J. Lugtenburg, Recl. Trav.
troscopy are given in the Supporting Information. Chim. Pays-Bas 1989, 108, 304 313; c) E. M. M. van den Berg, F. J. H. M.
Jansen, A. T. J. W. de Goede, A. U. Baldew, J. Lugtenburg, Recl. Trav.
Chim. Pays-Bas 1990, 109, 287 297; d) B. R. Branchini, F. G. Prendergast,
Acknowledgements G. A. Spencer, J. D. Hugdahl, B. D. Ray, M. D. Kemple, J. Labelled Compd.
Radiopharm. 1987, 24, 637 643; e) M. F. Lautie, M. Corval, J. Labelled
This work was partly supported by grants from the Austrian Sci- Compd. Radiopharm. 1982, 19, 1011 1020; f) S.-S. Yuan, A. M. Ajami, Tet-
rahedron 1982, 38, 2051 2053; g) C. J. Unkefer, S. N. Lodwig, L. A.
ence Foundation (FWF) (I844 to R.K.). We thank Christoph Kreutz
Silks III, J. L. Hanners, D. S. Ehler, R. Gibson, J. Labelled Compd. Radio-
and Christoph H. Wunderlich (Institute of Organic Chemistry, Uni- pharm. 1991, 29, 1247 1256; h) N. Ilic, J. D. Cohen, J. Labelled Compd.
versity of Innsbruck) for providing the RNA oligonucleotide. Radiopharm. 2004, 47, 635 646.
[22] R. J. Lichtenecker, Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 7551 7560.
[23] a) B. Xia, H. Ke, W. Jiang, M. Inouye, J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 6005
Keywords: indole isotope labeling NMR spectroscopy 6011; b) K. Newkirk, W. Feng, W. Jiang, R. Tejero, S. D. Emerson, M.
protein expression tryptophan Inouye, G. T. Montelione, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 5114 5118.
[24] T. Sra, T. C. Schwarz, D. Kurzbach, C. H. Wunderlich, C. Kreutz, R. Konrat,
ChemistryOpen 2014, 3, 115 123.
ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 746 751 www.chembiochem.org 750 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Communications
[25] a) B. Sathyamoorthy, K. K. Singarapu, A. E. Garcia, T. Szyperski, ChemBio- chemistry 2014, 53, 4519 4525; e) U. Weininger, M. Respondek, C. Lw,
Chem 2013, 14, 684 688; b) U. Weininger, C. Diehl, M. Akke, J. Biomol. M. Akke, J. Phys. Chem. B 2013, 117, 9241 9247.
NMR 2012, 53, 181 190; c) U. Weininger, M. Respondek, M. Akke, J.
Biomol. NMR 2012, 54, 9 14; d) U. Weininger, K. Modig, M. Akke, Bio- Received: November 26, 2014
Published online on February 20, 2015
ChemBioChem 2015, 16, 746 751 www.chembiochem.org 751 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Copyright of ChemBioChem is the property of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. and its content may
not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.