Design studies - The International Journal for Design Research in Engineering, Architecture, Products and Systems

The application of Virtual Design and

Construction in civil engineering projects.
An analysis and guideline to the application of the iRoom at Royal HaskoningDHV

M ARK VAN RIJSBERGEN (4037782)| DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY | 31 J ANUARI 2013

Abstract
This article examines the application of Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) in civil engineering
projects. VDV is a method which makes use of the multi-screen iRoom to allow stakeholders
simultaneously describe, present and evaluate projects on product, organisation and process
perspectives (Kunz and Fischer 2012). This paper addresses the problem on how the application
of VDC can achieve a shared understanding with problem owners in civil engineering projects
to manage organisational complexity. Through observations on the application of VDC and
interviews with the participants the added value of the method is regarded. The article shows
that the application of VDC provides added value in the development of civil engineering
projects. Through actively involving problem owners in the iRoom their understanding and
perception of the design task is enlarged. However the method can further develop by providing
more guidance in the application for individual project managers. The iRoom is in particular useful
in design tasks were a mutual agreement between problem owners is needed on spatial design
issues. The extensive use of visualisations and metrics in the iRoom contribute to this.
Keywords: Virtual Design and Construction (VDC), Collaborative engineering, Systems Engineering

I. Introduction confronted with different tasks and

This paper examines the application of
Virtual Design and Construction (VDC) in civil
engineer projects. VDC can be seen as a
method which makes use of the multi-screen
iRoom that allows different stakeholders to
simultaneously describe, present and
evaluate a project on product, organisation
and process perspectives (Kunz and Fischer
2012). The application of VDC is researched at
consultancy and engineering firm Royal
HaskoningDHV. This company is progressive
with the use of this method as it is one of its
early adapters in the market.
The implementation of VDC has its
reasons. Mainly due to public parties that
increasingly assign engineering firms earlier in
civil engineering projects (Rijkswaterstaat
2008). This has resulted in a changed design
and engineering task as engineering firms are
responsibilities that traditionally belonged to
the client. The focus in this changing design
and engineering challenge lies more on
specifying the actual design question and to
lesser extent on the development of the
technical solution. As public clients leave
responsibility to the market means they also
get the assignment to be accountable for a
part of the decision making process.
The complexity in this changing design
and engineering challenge lies on how to
create a shared understanding among the
problem owners on the design task.
Objectives of problem owners are often not
entirely clear, especially during the early
project phases of civil engineering projects
(Leidraad SE 2009). Besides, due to the often
conflicting interests of interdependent
stakeholders and the long duration of civil

1
 The application of Virtual Design and Construction in civil engineering projects.

engineering projects, objectives can change. understanding with problem owners in civil
This brings importance to the interaction engineering projects.
between client and market to ensure a II. The concept of VDC
mutual agreement and commitment
This section provides an overview to VDC
throughout the design task. The complexity in
from the theory in order to obtain an
civil engineering projects therefore lies not
understanding of this concept. The method is
only on the hard system engineering
developed at the Stanford University by the
discipline, but rather on the soft and social
Centre for Integrated Facility Engineering.
system perspective. The application of VDC
VDC is defined as the use of multi-
also confronts Royal HaskoningDHV with the
disciplinary performance models of design-
challenges in collaborative design (Piirainen,
construction projects, including the Product
Kolfschoten et al. 2012).
(i.e., facilities), Work Processes and
To respond to these developments Royal
Organisation of the design - construction -
HaskoningDHV initiated to implement VDC.
operation team in order to support business
Through using this method they aim to provide
objectives. (Garcia, Kunz et al. 2004, CIFE
an added value to their clients in the
2012, Kunz and Fischer 2012). The methods
development of civil engineering projects. On
makes use of models and visualisations that
the other hand they expect to obtain more
can be presented to and evaluated by
control on the policy uncertainties and
multiple stakeholders (Kunz and Fischer 2012).
decision making by involving problem owners
in the design process.
However, these expectations cannot be
substantiated yet. Therefore this research aims
to provide an answer on the following
research question: How can the application
of Virtual Design and Construction achieve a
shared understanding with problem owners in
civil engineering projects to manage
organisational complexity?. This article can
Figure 1 The concept of Virtual Design and Construction (DHV
be seen as a first step in creating a scientific 2012)
understanding on the application and added
VDC focuses on three main components
value of VDC in civil engineering projects.
as can be seen in Figure 1. These components
In order to provide an answer to the are considered present in every design and
research question this article will presents an
construction process: product, organisation
overview of the concept of VDC. Then the and process (Garcia, Kunz et al. 2004, Kunz
need of VDC in the civil engineering sector is and Fischer 2012)). In VDC these subjects are
considered by defining various drivers for the
made visual and measurable with the use
application. Then the application of VDC itself models, drawings and simulations. A central
at Royal HaskoningDHV is examined. This is
key role is given to the iRoom as this facilitates
performed by an analysis of the method from to the use of POP-models in a process of
the perspective of the problem owners Integrated Concurrent Engineering (ICE). The
through various observations and interviews
iRoom is featured with multiple interactive
with participants. With this understanding a presentation touchscreens. Stakeholders are
recommendations for the application of VDC invited to use the Smartboards to enhance
are developed. These contain of guidelines
and present interactive POP models and
that have the aim to contribute to a shared visualisations (Kunz and Fischer 2012).

2
 The application of Virtual Design and Construction in civil engineering projects.

of POP models. In the civil engineering sector

this integration is also known as Building
Information Modelling (BIM). This means that
project data and information from one model
is exchanged with other models. The final and
third level is reached by automation of the
Figure 2 The iRoom at Royal HaskoningDHV design tasks. This automation is about
In order to present, evaluate and describe prefabrication of certain design task that can
POP-models visualisations and metrics are easily be implemented and used in the VDC
used. Visualisations may contain a design process.
representation of the technical components,
the involved actors or the process which the III. The application of VDC in the civil
organisation follows to develop the project. engineering sector
Visualisations are solely virtual and computer VDC was originally developed for the US
based. This makes them more flexible and Architecture, Engineering and Construction
interactive to use. For example, visualisations industry. However, the method is general and
can be rotated and components can be can be used for other construction-design
switched on or off (Kunz & Fischer, 2012). VDC process. This section discusses the application
imposes to measure the performance on of VDC in the Dutch civil engineering sector.
product, organisation and process with the
use of metrics. By determine the project
objectives in advance, the projects
performance can be predicted and
measured. Metrics can be seen as
requirements and objectives of the
performance of product, organisation and
process.
Virtual Design and Construction cannot
be considered a standardized design method
as CIFE does not propose standards for the
VDC models and approach (Kunz and Fischer
2012). However, implementation levels for
VDC are defined. This model consist of three
different levels of implementation as can be
seen Figure 3.
Figure 4 Drivers for the use of VDC in the civil engineering
sector

As can be seen in Figure 4 the

Figure 3 Schematic representation of the VDC maturity
model levels (Schrama 2011)-edited
The first level is the use and development
of the POP models (Kunz and Fischer 2012).
The design team makes visualisation and
metrics of the product, organisation and
process. The next level requires an integration
application of VDC can be reasoned from
three drivers. The first driver identified is the
often poor performance of civil engineering
projects. This is demonstrated in the large
amount of cost overruns, failure cost, late
completion dates and technical problems
that are substantiated by various studies
(Cantarelli, Molin et al. 2012). VDC can in

3
 The application of Virtual Design and Construction in civil engineering projects.
theory be used to perform better research
and examination in the early project phases.
The second driver is seen in the market
developments that result in a changed design
task for Royal HaskoningDHV due to
integrated contracts. On this new design tasks
Royal HaskoningDHV can respond with the
application of VDC. The final driver identified
is the project complexity that characterize
most civil engineering projects. The
complexity encountered in the development
of civil engineering projects is in addition to
the technical difficulty also organisational.
VDC responds to this by focusing on both the
product as well as the organisation and
process. With the use of visualisations and
metrics the structural complexity can be
quantified, measured and prepared during
iRoom sessions. Dynamic complexities that
result from interaction between stakeholders
can occur during iRoom sessions. These type
of complexities can be managed with the use
of VDC in iRoom sessions. In theory the
application of VDC can be of added value
reasoned from these drivers. However, its use
and expectations are not yet demonstrated
and proven in practise.
IV. Results of VDC application at Royal
HaskoningDHV
The application of the VDC at Royal
HaskoningDHV has been research through a
series of observations in the iRoom and
interviews with problem owners. For this five
civil engineering projects were selected that
used VDC in the iRoom. The selected projects
ranged from the upon the research phase till
the final design phase.
Observation results
In order to examine VDC in the iRoom an
observation framework was developed as
can be seen in the following figure.
Figure 5 Observation framework iRoom sessions
The observations made clear that the
application and quality of VDC differs
considerably between the projects. This results
mainly due to the lack of structure and
guidance in the application. VDC was used
for various objectives in civil engineering
projects. The application was observed most
useful for the conceptualisation and
examination of design alternatives in
collaboration with problem owners.
Visualisations of the system or
components were used extensively with the
help of 3D models, simulations, aerial and
street level photos. By using visualisation it was
shown that especially spatial design problems
were more easily to solve by the participants.
Within the application of VDC the use of
metrics remained limited in most sessions. This
made that many design considerations were
not quantified fully by the participants.
However, as experts were present during most
sessions estimations on for example feasibility
and cost could be made. The design activities
taken in the application of VDC not always
followed logical steps. In some cases the
sessions instantly focused on many in depth
technical issues and the development of
solutions. This without first agreeing on the
requirements and principles of the design task.
Also the steps of system modelling and
analysis were not always performed once
design alternatives were made.
From the observations it was shown that
all session managed to provide a contribution
relative to the objective of the project. It was
observed that the iRoom resulted in an
enlarged perception for the problem owners.
This contributed to the involvement and
shared understanding in the project.
4
 The application of Virtual Design and Construction in civil engineering projects.
Interview results
A total of nine problem owners of the
observed iRoom sessions were interviewed on
their experiences and expectations of VDC.
All problems owners had very positive
expectations to the use of VDC in their
projects. They expected a contribution to the
perception, information exchange and the
decision making. Often the iRoom was
motivated to collaboratively examine and
develop possible solutions for the design task
as a mutual agreement was considered
needed.
The experiences range from very
positive to the level that participants had
higher expectations from the session. The
iRoom was considered useful to develop a
supported solution for the design and to
examine spatial limitations in the projects. In
addition the iRoom provided a more process
related outcome. Problem owners indicated
that the iRoom contributed to their perception
to the project. The use of visualisation on the
multi-screen Smartboards provided an added
value in the examination of the project.
However they also indicated that cost
estimates and analysis were often considered
abstract and of conceptual level.
This made that problem owners often
experienced the application of VDC as not
complexly utilized in contrast to the expected
capabilities. This argues for further
development of VDC as problem owners
were positive on the application. For this a
good process design, facilitation and
objective is seen as essential for successful
iRoom sessions.
V. Future development and application
With VDC, Royal HaskoningDHV has a
valuable method in possession to actively
involve problem owners into their design and
engineering process. Therefore the
recommendation is made to further develop
the application of VDC.
Preconditions of VDC
The application of the iRoom was shown
to have most potential in the early project
phases. In particular for the conceptualisation
of various design alternatives. The iRoom
contributes to this by using visualisations and
metrics to examine projects quickly and
abstract level so it is understandable for
problem owners.
However, the application of VDC
cannot be an objective on its own. In order to
make optimal use of VDC there must be a
clear objective defined to the project. The
design task on the other hand must be suited
for treatment in the iRoom. The iRoom is
considered most useful when the design task
satisfies to two condition. The project must
contain some sort of organisational
complexity. The iRoom can contribute to this
by actively involving different stakeholder. On
the other hand the iRoom must contains some
sort of technical complexity which allows
visualisations.
Application of VDC
To further develop the application of
VDC a basic program is recommend. This
provides more structure and guidance in the
application of VDC. This program consist of
three phases: preparation of VDC,
application of iRoom and the evaluation of
VDC.
Prior the application of the iRoom a plan
of action should be developed. The plan of
action must be developed in cooperation
with iRoom experts and facilitators. The
development of the plan of action consists of
the following steps: interviews with problem
owners, development of VDC program and
the development of visualizations and metrics.
The application of VDC in the iRoom is
suggested to consist of a minimum of three
steps namely issue formulation, analysis and
interpretation. These steps are considered
minimum in a systems engineering activity,
regardless of the phase of the project (Sage
5
 The application of Virtual Design and Construction in civil engineering projects.
and Armstrong 2000). These steps can be
taken in one or multiple iRoom sessions, as can
be shown in the following figure.
Figure 6 Recommended steps in application of VDC (Sage
and Armstrong 2000)
Within the application of the iRoom
various trade-offs exists. At first it must be
considered how many iRoom session will be
performed for the project. The number of
iRoom session is strongly dependent upon the
scale of the project, the technical complexity
and the amount of stakeholders involved in
the project. The following table provides some
guidance in the amount of sessions to apply
within a project phase.
Figure 7 Number of iRoom sessions to apply
Once the amount of sessions have been
defined the design activates should be
considered per session. Small scale design task
with modest complexity that only allow
visualisations are able to withstand with one
iRoom session. More complex design task that
need to be substantiated with metrics are
hard to perform in one iRoom session. The step
of system analysis is seen as a difficulty to
perform within the iRoom as this is generally a
time consuming task. Therefore it is suggested
to perform the step of system analysis
between different iRoom sessions. This makes
the first iRoom session consist the activities of
issue formulation and the second iRoom
session the activities of issue interpretation.
After the application of iRoom an evaluation
must be taken with the problem owners. This
evaluation is suggested to consists of several
steps namely reporting, results and debriefing.
In this evaluation it is considered whether the
application of VDC meets to the expectations
of the problem owners.
VI. Conclusion
This article shows that the application of
VDC provides added value in the
development of civil engineering projects. The
conclusion can be made that the application
of VDC contributes in creating an shared
understanding with problems owners to deal
with organisational complexities.
Through actively involving problem
owners in the iRoom their understanding and
perception on the design task is enlarged. The
application of VDC differs from the traditional
design approach in civil engineering projects.
Through VDC a shift is made from pure
engineering to the facilitation of design and
decision making processes. This allows
problem owners to design by themselves in
the iRoom with the help of visualisations and
metrics. The case analysis showed that
problem owners have positive experiences on
this approach.
However, the application of VDC must
be professionalised to further utilize the
expectations of problem owners. In particular
the use of metrics remains limited within the
application of VDC. Also the possibility to
design real-time and ability to show direct
results could be further improved. Therefore
the recommendation is made to develop
standardized tools, methods and approaches
that can be consulted in different projects. In
addition, an allowance for the exchange of
methods and tools should be established.
6
 The application of Virtual Design and Construction in civil engineering projects.
References
Aanbestedingsinstituut Bouw & Infra. (2010). Laagste
prijs demotiveert markt en staat innovativiteit in de
weg. PPS Netwerk.
Agentschap NL. (2011). Werk mee aan duurzaam GWW.
AIA. (2007). Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide.
American Institute of Architects.
Baccarini, D. (1996). The concept of project complexity
a review. International Journal of Project Management,
14(4), 201-204.
Busker, Henri. (2011). Faalkosten in de GWW sector
dalen licht. USP Marketing Consultancy.
Cantarelli, C. C., Molin, E. J. E., van Wee, B., & Flyvbjerg,
B. (2012). Characteristics of cost overruns for Dutch
transport infrastructure projects and the importance of
the decision to build and project phases. Transport
Policy, 22, 49-56.
Chachere, J., Kunz, J., & Levitt, R. (2003). Can you
accelerate your project using extreme collaboration? a
model based analysis. Center for Integrated Facility
Engineering (CIFE), Stanford University, CIFE Technical
Report(154).
Chachere, J., Kunz, J., & Levitt, R. (2004). Observation,
theory, and simulation of integrated concurrent
engineering: Grounded theoretical factors that enable
radical project acceleration. CIFE WP, 87.
Checkland, P. (2000). Soft systems methodology: a thirty
year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral
Science, 17, 11-58.
CROW. (2007). Handboek Oplossingsvrij specificeren.
De Bruijn, H., & Herder, P.M. (2009). System and actor
perspectives on sociotechnical systems. Systems, Man
and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE
Transactions on, 39(5), 981-992.
Freerks, M. (2011). From interoperability till integrality:
Improving design and engineering based on Building
Information Modeling. Hogeschool Utrecht.
Freerks, M. (2012). De koppeling BIM en SE: Integraal
werken in Virtual Engineering. DHV.
Garcia, A., Kunz, J., Ekstrom, M., & Kiviniemi, A. (2004).
Building a project ontology with extreme collaboration
and virtual design and construction. Advanced
Engineering Informatics, 18(2), 71-83.
Goossens, A.M.A. (2007). Gentegreerde contracten - de
scheiding der markten. GHC International,.
Hall, A.D. (1969). Three-dimensional morphology of
systems engineering. Systems Science and Cybernetics,
IEEE Transactions on, 5(2), 156-160.
Hevner, A.R. (2007). The three cycle view of design
science research. Scandinavian Journal of Information
Systems, 19(2), 87.
Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004).
Design science in information systems research. MIS
quarterly, 28(1), 75-105.
Hutchinson, R., & Wabeke, H. (2006). Opportunity and
Project Management Guide. Shell International
Exploration and Production B.V.
INCOSE. (2004). INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook.
Kunz, J., & Fischer, M. (2012). Virtual design and
construction: themes, case studies and
implementation suggestions. CIFE, Stanford University,
Stanford, CA, CIFE Working Paper, Version 14.
Leidraad SE. (2009). Leidraad voor Systems Engineering
binnen de GWW-sector.
Mark, G. (2002). Extreme collaboration. Communications
of the ACM, 45(6), 89-93.
NASA. (1995). NASA Systems Engineering Handbook.
Piirainen, K.A., Kolfschoten, G.L., & Lukosch, S. (2012).
The Joint Struggle Of Complex Engineering: A Study Of
The Challenges Of Collaborative Design. International
Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making,
11(06), 1087-1125.
Rijkswaterstaat. (2007). Handreiking Systeemgerichte
contractbeheersing.
Rijkswaterstaat. (2008). Visie toonaangevend
opdrachtgever.
Rijkswaterstaat. (2011). Stappenplan van
projectopdracht tot Vraagspecificatie.
Rycroft, R.W., & Kash, D.E. (1999). The complexity
challenge: Technological innovation for the 21st
century: Thomson Learning.
Sage, A., & Armstrong, J. (2000). Introduction to systems
engineering: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Schrama, Paul. (2011). Implementing Virtual Design and
Construction: Evaluation and improvement of the VDC
implementation in the design phase of AEC projects.
(Master), Delft University of Technology.
Siebrand, Ronald. (2010). Prijs voorlopig nog
doorslaggevend? Cobouw.
Vink, Eline. (2008). Systems Engineering in de praktijk.
Technische Universiteit Delft.
Whitty, S.J., & Maylor, H. (2009). And then came
complex project management (revised). International
Journal of Project Management, 27(3), 304-310.
Wind, H. (2006). Wat vraagt de markt? Een onderzoek
naar de veranderende vraag aan het advies- en
ingenieursbureau door de veranderende
infrastructurele markt. Universiteit Twente.