Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
A SWOT analysis on Six Sigma: some perspectives from leading academics and
practitioners
Jiju Antony
Article information:
To cite this document:
Jiju Antony, (2012),"A SWOT analysis on Six Sigma: some perspectives from leading academics and
practitioners", International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 61 Iss 6 pp. 691 -
698
Downloaded by HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY At 16:15 24 September 2014 (PT)
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 173423 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
*Related content and download information correct at time of download.
Downloaded by HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY At 16:15 24 September 2014 (PT)
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/1741-0401.htm
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and
threats of Six Sigma based on the perspectives of leading academics and practitioners.
Design/methodology/approach The approach taken was to collate opinions from a number of
leading academics and practitioners from different countries. It was also important to ensure that all
participants in the study had a good knowledge and expertise in the field of Six Sigma.
Findings The key findings are presented in the paper.
Research limitations/implications The viewpoints expressed in the paper are based on leading
experts from both academic and industrial communities. Due to limited time constraints, the number
of people who participated in the study was relatively small.
Originality/value The paper provides an excellent resource for many researchers and practitioners
equally who are engaged in research and applications of the most powerful business process
improvement methodology we have witnessed for several years.
Keywords Six Sigma, Quality programmes, SWOT analysis, Process excellence, Strategy
Paper type Research paper
Introduction
Six Sigma as a business strategy is gaining ever increasing popularity within many
organisations world-wide including manufacturing, financial service companies,
health care providers and governmental agencies. Six Sigma, a trademark of
Motorola, was introduced nearly 25 years ago as a method to reduce manufacturing
defects. The concept behind Six Sigma was developed by Bill Smith, an engineer,
within Motorola as a powerful methodology to improve the reliability of products
by reducing excessive variation which results in defects in manufacturing
processes. Six Sigma is a systematic, project-oriented, statistically based approach
for removing defects from products, processes and transactions. Bill Smith was
quite successful with his idea of integrating hard-nosed applied statistical methods
into the powerful engineering processes which essentially laid out the foundation
of Six Sigma. It has been estimated that Motorola reduced defects on semiconductor
devices by up to 94 per cent between 1987 and 1993. Today Six Sigma has been a
powerful business strategy for improving business performance in many world-class
corporations by improving quality, reducing costs and creating value for the enterprise
and customers. International Journal of Productivity
SWOT analysis is a strategic-level analysis and stands for strengths, weaknesses, and Performance Management
Vol. 61 No. 6, 2012
opportunities and threats. It is a method of analysing a business, its resources and its pp. 691-698
environment. Strengths and weaknesses are positive and negative internal factors r Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1741-0401
whereas opportunities and threats are external factors. Strengths typically represent DOI 10.1108/17410401211249229
IJPPM the internal strong points of an organisation and these are the things companies do
61,6 well over their competitors so that they would find it difficult to emulate. Weaknesses
are the weak points of an organisation. Weaknesses are the factors which do not meet
the standards we feel they should meet. Opportunities are presented by the
environment within which our organisation operates. Opportunities may arise from
market, competition, industry/government and technology. Threats are those factors
692 which can put in danger the survival of the organisation, if they are recognised on
time they can become opportunities. A panel of academic experts and practitioners
were chosen to discuss the topic a SWOT analysis on Six Sigma. The people who
have participated in this panel discussion include the leading practitioners and
academics in the field.
Downloaded by HERIOT WATT UNIVERSITY At 16:15 24 September 2014 (PT)
organisation;
. changes organizational paradigms; and
promotes customer focus;
measurement is the key;
variability is the enemy;
act on facts; and
empowers employees and teams.
. the most important strength of Six Sigma is undoubtedly the unyielding
statistical thinking in all problem solving and process improvement
efforts.
Further reading
Antony, J. (2004), Some pros and cons of Six Sigma: an academic perspective, The TQM
Magazine, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 303-6.
Antony, J. (2007), Six Sigma: a strategy for supporting innovation in pursuit of business
excellence invited paper, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 37
Nos 1/2, pp. 8-12.
Antony, J. (2008), What is the role of academic institutions for the future development of Six
Sigma, International Journal of Productivity & Performance Management, Vol. 57 No. 1,
pp. 107-10.
IJPPM Linderman, K., Schroeder, R.G., Zaheer, S. and Choo, A.S. (2003), Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic
perspective, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 193-203.
61,6
Snee, R. (2004), Six Sigma: the evolution of 100 years of business improvement methodology,
International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 4-20.
2010 and has been invited several times as a keynote speaker to national conferences on Six
Sigma in China, South Africa, Netherlands, India, Greece, New Zealand, South Africa and
Poland. He has also chaired the First, Second and Third International Conferences on Six Sigma
and First and Second International Workshops on Design for Six Sigma. His recent work
includes collaborations with organisations such as Thales Optronics Ltd, Scottish Power, Rolls-
Royce, Tata Motors, Bosch, Nokia, GE Domestic Appliances, Scottish Widow, 3 M, Land Rover,
GE Power Systems, NHS Ayr and Aaran, Kwit Fit Financial Services, Clydesdale Bank, etc. in
the development of Six Sigma, Lean and Continuous Improvement programmes within these
organisations. He is on the Editorial Board of over eight international journals and a regular
reviewer of five leading international journals in quality, operations and production
management. Jiju Antony can be contacted at: jiju.antony@strath.ac.uk