MIXING SHOULD BE A
process operation, not a me
chanical problem. Yet, some
plants push a mixer beyond the
capability of its mechanical de-
sign and then get themselves into
trouble, While most mixers can pro-
vide a long service life — for instance,
some are still operating a
than 30 years — mechanic:
lems can shorten life or even break
parts, Often, the processing capa
bilities of the mixer fail before the
equipment does, but poor process
ing can cause mechanical problems,
Usually, equipment manufacturers
know the limits of their equipment and
design to specified conditions. How-
ever, over the life of a mixer, process
requirements and conditions may
change from those specified for de-
sign. So, here, we will explore some
fof the mechanical problems that
yn =
“Ms reve
Sa
‘may befall mixing equipment.
Most everyone appreciates the danger
of overloading a mixes, usually by trying
to mix a material chat is more viscous
than the mixer can handle. Actually, many
mixers are designed to cope with a wide
range of materials and have considerable
overload capabilities. Some portable mix:
crs and high-speed dispersers can handle
very high viscosities without overload-
ve Suh mc yma Sw on
than 1% che ve er (|
Spel ee Towees oe
‘of motor capacity and so are less tol
erant of upset conditions. While high.
Micoiy i an obvious Iead factor in
the moto loadin urbulent conditions A
high densi lid, such sa minor str
Signed for proces conditions. a any case By David S. Dickey, Me Teh, In.
tear reducer, shafs, impeller blades and
sro muh ty ninans mot ond Mechanical issues can cripple your mixer
Sal process overloads can occur and may and spoil your process
damage the motor of shorten the ie of
i componcn
40 May 2006 worseMechanical failures
[A mixer component, such as a shaft, shaft seal, impeller
blade or gear reduces, may fail for several reasons. Differ-
ences between actual process conditions and original design
criteria often can cause problems. In other cases, installa
tion shortcomings can contribute to equipment failures.
The “werted” parts of the mixer must be designed to
handle mechanical loads, process conditions and potential
vibrations, Most mechanical loads come from an interac
tion between the mixer and the fluid (Figure 1). Obviously,
a force is necessary to rotate the impeller. That force is
represented by a torque load transmitted by the shaft from
the drive to the impeller. Besides the fluid forces that re
sist the rorating impeller, moving fluid creates random hy-
draulic forces that act perpendicularly to the shaft. These
forces create a bending moment on the shaft. A typical
cantilevered shaft, which is supported only by the mixer
drive, can experience significant bending loads. So, sclec-
tion of shaft diameter requires consideration of both the
torque and bending loads.
Torque is easily calculated from the basic relationship
of power divided by speed, with an appropriate conver-
sion factor for units:
Ty = 63,025 Prag /N Ww
where Tis toratc,inlbf P,,,. i moar power, hp; and
Nis rotational speed, rpm,
Hydraulic loads ace based on empicical relationships.
[An expression for the bending load on a mixer shaft with
4 single impeller is:
M-= 19,000 P_Lf,JND 2)
where Mis the Bending moment, in-Ibf; Lis the “shaft
length to support,” in; f, is the hydraulic load factor; and
D is the impeller diameter, in. The “shaft length to sup-
port” may exceed the shaft length inside the tank because
the nearest support bearing may be in the drive or seal
above the tank mounting or flange. Multiple impellers re-
quire separate bending-load calculations for each, using
the fraction of the motor power at each impeller and at
the appropriate shaft length, and then surnming of the in-
dividual bending loads
The hydeaulic load factor may surpass 1.0 for cases
where loads fluctuate, as in gas dispersion ot boiling sys-
tems {fy = 2.0 to 3.0}, or where extreme extemal loads
may occu, as with impacting large clumps of solids (f,
= 3.0 to 7.0). The severe load most often overlooked is
prolonged operation at che liquid level, as when filing oF
emptying the tank. Operation near the liquid level may re
sult in a significant hydraulic load factor {f, = 2.0 0 3.5),
depending upon impeller type and mixing intensity.
‘Once the torque and bending loads have been estim
ed, basic ealeulations can be made for the shear and tensile
stresses in the mixer shaft.
The expression for shear stress is:
@,= 16(T + Mind? (3)
sorchemislprs
singcom
>
Pun
yea
force
<
Figur 1 Various ces contibuts ote load hat shaft must contend wth
where o, is shear stress, psy and d is shaft diameter, in
A typical allowable shear stress for carbon and stain-
less sees is 6,000 psi. Ths stress level takes into account
the effects of fluctuating mixing forces that could result in
2 fatigue file
A similar expression for tensile stress is
6,2 16M + (Te + MP)" (4)
where gs tensile stength, psi
[A reasonable allowable tensile stress level for steels is
10,000 psi. Higher-than-allowable stress levels may lead
10 fatigue failure of the mixer shaft. Other factors, such
as welds or steps in the shaft, may cause stress risers that
may increase local stresses, which, in turn, could resuft in
failures. Fluctuating loads also act on the impeller blades
and may cause other component fal
The vertical forces on the miser, such as weight, pres-
sure and thrust, have litle impact on the shaft design but
may affect mixer mounting. Axial low impellers create
some axial thrust, enough to occasionally lift an impeller
off shaft mounts,
Bearings on the ousput shaft of the mixer drive must
resist the lateral forces of the bending loads and the ax
ial forces of weight and pressure. Bending loads also are
transmitted up the shaft and may result in deflections be-
tween the bearings, causing gear misalignment. Shaft de
fictions also can lead to failures inthe shaft seals, since
mechanical seals are especially susceptible to damage by
large deflections
May 2006 +41Natural frequency
‘A mechanical factor often overlooked in design is the
mixer shaft’s natural frequency, often called the “critical
speed.” When the natural frequency of the mixer shaft is
too close to the operating speed of the mixer, a critical
speed problem is likely. This frequency is much like that
produced by a tuning fork. A combination of the shaft
length, shaft and impeller weights, and the elastic modulus
of the shafe material establishes a frequency at which the
shaft will vibrate, If external forces, such as the operat
ing speed of the mixer, match the natural frequency, cata-
strophie failure often occurs.
‘Most large mixers are designed to operate below the ist
natural frequency of the mixer shaft. Typically the operat-
ing speed of the mixer is restricted to less than 85% of the
natural frequency to avoid vibration problems. Ifthe rota
tional speed and natural frequency are too close, the ensuing
vibrations cause large deflecrions, which most often lead to a
severely bent mixer shaft. Recently, for instance, a 6-in-liam-
eter stainless stel shaft was bent so far that it only stopped
‘when ie struck an obstruction in the tank. Undamped vibra
tions can result in extremely large mechanical forces.
The calculation of the natural frequency for a mixer
SCL)
einfocement pac
ANSI nozzle
‘lass 150 or 300
4
Reinfocerent pad
ae
“A ANS pa
(ass 150 0300
\
ie
einfocement pas
Fue 2s cull o provide adoquat sts and support
42 + May 2006
shaft requires considerable knowledge about the details of
the shafe and impellers, including information about the
impeller weights and the shaft bearings, which usually are
inside the mixer drive. A complete calculation involves in-
dividual impeller weights, distance from support bearings,
and spacing between support bearings. Natural frequency
calculations are best done by the manufacturer. However,
the mixer user should know the natural frequency because
variable frequency drives (VEDs) can be overspeeded,
‘causing the mixer to approach the critical speed,
Unlike large mixers, portable units often operate above
the First natural frequency. These smaller mixers typically
accelerate quickly enough to pass safely through the natucal
frequency without incident. However, problems may devel-
‘op when the mixer runs for longer periods near the natural
frequency, as can occur with VEDs and air motors. While
the mixer operator may instinctively respond to eliminate
the vibrations, it may be too late to prevent a bent shaft or
even injury. Shaft natural frequencies must be avoided,
Mixer mounting
Another factor in mechanical design for mixers is the
mounting. While obvious design problems may result in
total failure to support the mixer, other shortcomings can
bbe more subtle and cause seemingly unrelated mechanical
failures. Design of the mixer support must consider all of
the mechanical loads on the mixer (Figuze 1).
First, the torsion and bending loads, previously calcu-
lated for shaft design, must be used to design the mounting,
Howeves, typical designs for tanks and structural supports
do not adequately account for the dynamic nature of mixer
loads. A support structure such as a beam in a building can
withstand considerable flexure without failing. The bridge
structures used to support mixers over large open tanks can
hhave enough flexure to cause motion sickness in someone
standing on a support that does not have adequate stiffness
The same flexure can result in considerable movernent with
a dynamic load such as a mixer.
Just as allowable stress levels for shaft design must be
kept well below yield stresses to avoid fatigue failures, sup-
port design must include adequace margins to provide suf-
ficient stiffness. Static load designs typically use 2.5 times
the calculated torque and 3.0 times the bending, loads to
avoid large deflections in the mixer supports
Second, the axial loads, which are not a real factor in
shaft design, Become much more significant in mounting,
design. The static weight of a large mixer can be consi
ecable when including the total weight of a motos, gear
drive, seal assembly, shaft and multiple impellers. These
downward loads are important bet so too can be the
upward load caused by tank pressure, With large pres
sures, the flanges, pedestals and drive bearings all must be
strengthened to handle increased loads. The mixer shaft
passing through a seal acts like a piston in transmitting
worchemicalprocessngcomforce, which can be significant. For instance, a 3-in-diam-
eter shaft (cross-sectional area of 7,07 in?) in a vessel at
300-psi pressure will create an upward force of 2,121 Ib
‘on the mixer drive and supports.
The nozzle or pad mounting for a mixer (Figure 2) re
quires that support be distributed across the head of the
tank. A nozzle uses gussets to provide sufficient stiffness
and support. A reinforcing or stiffening plate, called a
“skull cap,” often is formed to the head of the tank to
increase stiffness around the nozzle or pad. Without
this reinforcement, the head must be thicker and more
expensive, The reinforcement also reduces the possibil-
ity that the outer ends of the nozzle gussets can cause
fatigue cracks where stresses are concentrated. Wichin
practical limits, the better the mixer is supported, the
less likely other failures will occur,
A flexible or weak mounting will lead to other mechani-
cal problems. Deflections in the mixer mounting may rest
in a bent shaft or worn shaft bearings. A flexible mounting
also may allow vibrations that will prompt premature seal
failures. A weak mounting will decrease the first natural
frequency of the mixer shaft — and thuss may cause critical
speed problems not anticipated in the mixer design.
Make the most of your mixer
‘A mixer can best solve process problems if it isn't
hampered by mechanical problems. Moreover, always
keep in mind that a mechanical problem also can be
a safety problem,
An appreciation of design considerations and meth-
ods puts you in a better position to identify some of
the more common mechanical problems and even sug-
gest possible solutions. For new equipment, the more
the manufacturer understands about your process, the
less likely that mechanical problems will develop later.
For existing equipment, avoid increased bending loads
and operating near the eritical speed to prevent major
mechanical problems.
[For more information about mixer design, see the
chapter on “Mechanical Design of Mixing Equipment”
co-authored by David Dickey in the Handbook of Indus-
trial Mixing, Jobn Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2004).] GP
Dr. David S. Dicky i enor coment at MiTeh, In, Dayton, Ohio
He wae te Wanna ofthe 20
Award for Excollonce and Sustained Com
‘nations o Mixing Rear and Practice fom the Nor Ameria Mise
sng Foran, a afliateof AICBE,F-mabi fddiceymeictec. com
MONITOR VISCOSITY SIMPLY
Sense Motor
Horsepower
with Universal
Power Cell
EASY INSTALLATION
* No hoes in tanks or pipes
+ poy from sentve process
VERSATILE
+ One size aust for motors
from small up to 150 HE
+ Works on 3 phase, fixed or variable
‘tequency, DC and singe phase power
sensrrive
"10 times more senstive
tan just sensing amos
‘CONVENIENT OUTPUTS.
+ For meters, controllers, computers
4.20 milamps, 0-10 wots
&
CALL NOW FOR YOUR FREE 30-DAY TRIAL
888-600-3247
LOAD CONTROLS
INCORPORATED
WWW.LOADCONTROLS.COM
ran oo paps wnE SD
singcom
We Mix in Seconds,
Not Minutes!
The Bella™ Fluidized Zone Mixer
Cet
high capacity, precision mixin
Bee ae rg
with solids. Regardless of particle
Pree nr aes
ore mixed with a fast, efficient
Poe C Oe Umeed
the Bella mixer ideal for fragile
Pee nee?
core en Ly
Cee
ee een
Fernomaton go pa tan cco 208
May 2006 +43,