COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS & DESIGN BETWEEN

ANALYTICAL METHOD, ETABS V16, STAAD Pro V8I

FOR G+2 BUILDING
A Report Submitted To

UKA TARSADIA UNIVERSITY

In partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Master of Technology

In

Structural Engineering

By

NAME ENROLMENT NO.

Patel Palak B. 201604101310004
Naik Anand N. 201604101310010
Naik Sagar S. 201604101310021

Guided by
Prof. Grishma Thakar
M.E Geotechnical Engineering
Co-Guided by
Assistant Prof. Dimple Desai
M.Tech Structural Engineering

Department of Civil Engineering

Chhotubhai Gopalbhai Patel Institute of Technology
May-June 2016-17
i
 CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that research work embodied in this dissertation entitled

COMPARASION OF ANALYSIS & DESIGN BETWEEN
ANALYTICAL METHODS, ETABS V16, STAAD Pro V8i FOR G+2
BUILDING was carried out by Mr Patel Palak B. (Enrolment No.:
201604101310004), Mr Naik Anand N. (Enrolment No: 201604101310010),
Mr Naik Sagar S. (Enrolment No: 201604101310021) at Chhotubhai
Gopalbhai Patel Institute Of Technology for the partial fulfilment of M.
Tech. degree to be awarded by UKA TARSADIA UNIVERSITY. This research
work has been carried out under my supervision and is to my satisfaction.

Date:

Place:

Porf. Grishma Thakar Asst prof. Dimple Desai Mr. K. N. Gandhi

Guide Co-Guide Head Of Department

Dr. N. C. Shah
Director External Examiner

ii
 DECLARATION

We hereby certify that we are the sole author of this thesis and that neither
any part of this thesis nor the whole of the thesis has been submitted for a
degree to any other University or Institution.

We certify that, to the best of my knowledge, my thesis does not infringe

upon anyones copyright nor violate any proprietary rights and that any ideas,
techniques, quotations, or any other material from the work of other people
included in our thesis, published or otherwise, are fully acknowledged in
accordance with the standard referencing practices.

We declare that this is a true copy of our thesis, including any final
revisions, as approved by our thesis review committee.

Date:

Place:

NAME ENROLMENT NO. SIGNATURE

Patel Palak B. 201604101310004
Naik Anand N. 201604101310010
Naik Sagar S. 201604101310021

Signature and name of Guide

iii
 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The successful completion of any task would be incomplete without the mention of the

people who made it possible whose constant guidance and encouragement crowned our effort with

success.

We would like to show our greatest appreciation to Prof. Grishma Thakar and Asst. Prof.

Dimple Desai. We cant say Thank you as it isnt enough for her tremendous support and help. We

feel motivated and encouraged every time We attend her meeting. Without her encouragement and

guidance this project would not have materialized. Our special thanks to Prof. K.N. Gandhi Head of

the Civil Engineering Department, for all the facilities provided to successfully complete this work.

We would like to say special thanks to our classmates and all Faculty members of Civil

Engineering department who have played significant role as moral boosters and have extended all

possible help and co-operation. We express sincere gratitude to them.

We express Our deepest feeling of reverence to our parents for being pillars of strength that

encouraged us to elevate ourself academically.

All our efforts are result of cosmic system named GOD. Thank you lord for everything.

Thank You
Patel Palak B.
Naik Anand N.
Naik Sagar S.

iv
 ABSTRACT
Structural analysis & design are predominant in finding out signification threats to

integrity and stability of structure. Multi storied structures, when designed are made to fulfil

basic aspects and serviceability. All the challenges faced by structural engineers were taken

as opportunities to develop softwares such as STAAD-Pro, EATBS, SAP-2000 & STURD.

STAAD-Pro & ETABS are the present day leading design software in the market.

Many design companies use these softwares for their project design purpose. So, this project

mainly deals with the comparative analysis of the result obtained from the design of a G+2

building structure when design using ANALYTICAL METHOD, STAAD-Pro & ETABS

software separately.

v
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTIFICATE...........................................................................................................II

DECLARATION........................................................................................................III

ACKNOWLEDGMENT............................................................................................IV

ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................V

TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................VI

LIST OF TABLE.......................................................................................................VII

LIST OF FIGURE...................................................................................................VIII

1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 1
2. AIM & OBJECTIVE....................................................................................... 3
3. LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................... 4
4. ANLAYTICAL METHOD............................................................................. 6
4.1 INTRODUCTION ON ANALYTICAL METHOD............................... 6
4.2 G+2 BUILDING PLAN............................................................................. 7
4.3 TAKEN DATA........................................................................................... 8
4.4 ANALYTICAL METHOD ANALYSIS & DESIGN RESULT........... 9
4.5 ANALYTICAL CALCULATION.......................................................... 11
5. STAAD Pro V8i.............................................................................................. 14
5.1 INTRODUCTION ON STAAD Pro V8i................................................ 14
5.2 STAAD Pro ANALYSIS & DESIGN REPORT................................... 16
6. ETABS V16..................................................................................................... 18
6.1 INTRODUCTION ON ETABS V16....................................................... 18
6.2 ETABS ANALYSIS & DESIGN REPORT.......................................... 20
7. ANLYSIS & DESIGN COMPARATION................................................... 22
8. CONLUSIONS............................................................................................... 23
9. REFERANCES.............................................................................................. 24

vi
 LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NO. 4.2.1 BEAM DESIGN BY ANALYTICAL METHOD.......9

TABLENO.4.2.2 COLUMMN DESIGN BY ANALYTICAL METHOD.10

TABLE NO 7.1.1 BEAM DESIGN COMPARAISON................................22

TABLE NO 7.1.2 COLUMN DESIGN COMPARAISON.........................22

vii
 LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE NO. 4.1.1 G+2 BUILDING PLAN...................................................7

FIGURE NO.5.1.1 STAAD Pro MODEL.....................................................15

FIGURE NO. 5.1.2 STAAD Pro ANALYSIS MODEL...............................15

FIGURE NO. 6.1.1 ETABS MODEL............................................................19

FIGURE NO. 6.1.2 ETABS DESIGN MODEL...........................................19

viii