At first we for checking for outliers with the Boxplot.

From the output we can see that there are outliers -67,49,44,41,56,43,68,208,233,221,192
We also can check 5 assumption- normality

Shapiro-wilk test:
H0: Population is normally distributed

H1: Data's distribution is not equal to a normal distribution

From the table p<0.05 we reject the null hypothesis that population is normally distributed and
conclude that datas distribution is not equal to a normal distribution.

asumtion 6: homogeneity of variance test:

Lets check with Levenes statistics:

H0: 12 = 22 = 32 = 42 = 52 = 62 (Homogeneity)

H1: Not all variances are equal in the population (Heterogeneity)

As we see Levenes statistics is statistically significant, because p<0.05 and we reject the
null hypothesis that population variances are equal and conclude that we have heterogeneity.

H0: All the means are equal in the population

H1: At least one mean isnt equal in the population

F(5,230)=73.851, p<0.0005 (when sig is .000, it doesnt mean that p=0.000) which means
that p<0.05. So, p value isnt statistically significant and we reject the null hypothesis that all the
means are the same (they equal to each other) and we conclude that at least one mean isnt equal
to others.

The social preferences were statistically significantly different for all the treatments,
F(5,230)=73.851, p<0.05.
Tukey post hoc test:

Mean St. Error Sig. 95% Confidence Interval

Comparison shows:

1. The mean of social prefenrences in Standard 15 is 3.62162 higher than StandardLoss5.

The mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05

2. The mean of social prefenrences in Standard15 is -5.26014 less than Poverty15. The
mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05

3. The mean of social prefenrences in Standard15 is 2.28378 higher than PovertyLoss5.

The mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0.001<0.05
4. The mean of social prefenrences in Standard15 is 2.33820 higher than Poverty5. The
mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05
5. The mean of social prefenrences in Standard15 is 3.64361 higher than Standard5. The
mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05

6. The mean of social prefenrences in StandardLoss5 is -3.62162 less than Standart15.

The mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05
7. The mean of social prefenrences in StandardLoss5 is -8.88176 less than Poverty15.
The mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05

8. The mean of social prefenrences in StandardLoss5 is -1.33784 less than PovertyLoss5.

The mean difference is not statistically significantly as p=0.192<0.05
9. The mean of social prefenrences in StandardLoss5 is -1.28342 less than Poverty5. The
mean difference is not statistically significantly as p=0.187<0.05
10. The mean of social prefenrences in StandardLoss5 is -1.28342 less than Standard5.
The mean difference is not statistically significantly as p=0.187<0.05
11. The mean of social prefenrences in Poverty15 is 5.26014 higher than Standard15. The
mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05
12. The mean of social prefenrences in Poverty15 is 8.88176 higher than StandardLoss5.
The mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05
13. The mean of social prefenrences in Poverty15 is 7.54392 higher than PovertyLoss5.
The mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05
14. The mean of social prefenrences in Poverty15 is 7.59833 higher than Poverty5. The
mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05
15. The mean of social prefenrences in Poverty15 is 8.90375 higher than Standard5. The
mean difference is statistically significantly as p=0<0.05