Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Journal of Plant Pathology (2012), 94 (1, Supplement), S1.53-S1.56 Edizioni ETS Pisa, 2012 S1.53
S1.54 Biological control of X. aboricola pv. juglandis Journal of Plant Pathology (2012), 94 (1, Supplement), S1.53-S1.56
of bacterial antagonists for walnut blight control via say, which was repeated twice.
testing their effect on immature nuts and walnut A set of one-year-old potted walnut seedlings of the
seedlings. Xaj W7/1, a very virulent strain isolated from Xaj-susceptible cv. Chandler, was used for evaluating
diseased buds of walnut trees at Izmir in 2007 was used the antagonists activity by spraying with bacterial sus-
in all experiments. Before inoculation the bacterium pensions (109 CFU ml-1). P. vagans strain C9/1 was again
was grown on Kings B medium at 24C for 48 h, and used as reference biocontrol strain. Another set of
was then suspended in sterile distilled water to a final seedlings was sprayed with copper-oxychloride +
concentration of 108 CFU ml1 (spectrophotometrically maneb (0.2%,37.5%+20% a.i. per 100 litres of water)
determined at 600 nm). and Prohexadione Ca [(Regalis, BASF), 125 g a.i. per
A total of 35 bacterial antagonists were screened for 100 litres of water]. Water-treated seedlings and strain
their in vitro and in vivo biocontrol activity against Xaj, Xaj W7/1 were included as negative and positive con-
29 of which were isolated as epiphytes from the phyllo- trol, respectively. Each treatment was applied to six wal-
plane of healthy walnut trees. The others had been pre- nut seedlings in completely randomized blocks. The
viously isolated from beans, cucurbits, and olive trees seedlings were covered with plastic bags and kept in an
and found promising when tested in different host- air conditioned room at 24C and 90-95% RH.
pathogen combinations in Turkey. P. vagans strain C9/1 Seedlings were evaluated for Xaj damage to the leaves,
was used as reference biocontrol agent. Tests for an- depending on symptom development, 28 to 30 days af-
tibiosis between antagonistic bacteria and Xaj were con- ter inoculation. Disease symptoms on the leaves were
ducted in TSA (tryptic soy agar) plates. One hundred assessed evaluated using an empirical scale from 0 to 4
l of a 108 CFU/ml suspension of Xaj strain W7/1 where: 0 = no symptom; 1 = yellowish spots without
grown for 2 days on TSA medium was spread over the necrosis; 2 = no more than 3 necrotic spots; 3 = more
agar surface and let to dry. Three sterile assay disks (5 than 10 necrotic spots; 4 = more than 50% of the leaf
mm diameter) were placed on the agar and a suspension area with extensive necrosis and blight. The in vivo ex-
of each candidate antagonistic bacteria (109 CFU ml-1, periments were repeated twice yielding similar results.
10 l per disk) was deposited on each disk. Plates were Hence, one representative trial of each experiment is re-
incubated at 24C for 48 h and examined for the ap- ported. Statistical analyses of variance were conducted
pearance of growth inhibition zones whose size (mm) using the SPSS version 15.0, and means were compared
was recorded (Jetiyanon and Kloepper, 2002). There using the Duncan test (P=0.05). Identification of prom-
were four replications (or agar plates) per antagonistic ising bacterial antagonists at the species level was car-
bacterium. Tests were performed in duplicate. ried out by biochemical and physiological tests. The
Symptomless immature nuts (cv. Hartley) were col- presence of oxidase, fluorescent pigment production,
lected 30-40 days after setting (Gf) and used for testing gelatinase, arginine dihydrolase, levan sucrose, reduc-
the biocontrol activity of bacterial antagonists. De- tion of nitrate, pectinolytic activity on potato slices and
tached fruits were surface-disinfected with alcohol hypersensitive reaction on tobacco leaves were ascer-
(70%), rinsed with sterile distilled water (SDW) and tained according to Lelliott et al. (1966). Utilization of
dried before inoculation. Nuts were submitted to infil- trehalose, L (+) tartrate, and L(-) tryptophan was tested
tration by injecting antagonistic bacteria (30 l) and using basal medium [(NH4)H2PO4 1 g, KCl 0.2 g,
then Xaj on marked areas under controlled environ- MgSO4 7H2O 0.2 g, agar 3 g, bromothymol blue 0.08
mental conditions. Four inoculations per nut were made g, distilled water 1,000 ml, pH 7.2]. All these tests were
and eight replicates of 2 nuts per cultivar were tested. carried out to differentiate species and biovars accord-
SDW was injected into the immature nuts as control ing to Stanier et al. (1970) and Palleroni (1984). The
treatment. Xaj strain W7/1 was used as positive control ability of bacterial strains to assimilate 49 carbohy-
in nuts where no antagonistic bacteria were infiltrated drates, 49 organic acids, and 49 amino acids was evalu-
whereas P. vagans strain C9/1 was used as reference bio- ated using API50CH, API50AO, and API50A strips ac-
control agent. The incubation lasted 5 to 7 days at 24C cording to manufacturers instructions (Biomerieux,
and over 90% relative humidity (RH). Bacterial blight France).
incidence on immature walnut fruits was evaluated us- Of the 35 bacterial strains tested, 18 inhibited Xaj
ing an empirical scale from 0 to 4 where: 0 = no symp- with zones ranging from 3 to 13 mm and were used for
toms; 1 = very small superficial spots at the inoculation immature nut tests. Eight of these strains significantly
point; 2 = less then 2 mm wide superficial spots on the reduced fruit symptoms (73 to 88%) compared with the
inoculation point; 3 = blackening of the inoculation positive control (Fig. 1, 2). Strains WH48/1A,
point of nut 2 to 5 mm in diameter, extending in the in- WH39/1A, and WH68 were the most effective (88%,
ner tissues by 1 mm; 4 = blackening around the inocula- 84% and 86% reduction, respectively). By contrast,
tion point more than 5 mm in diameter, extending in strains WH43/1B, WH84/2, and WH42/1a were totally
the inner tissues by 2 to 4 mm (Aleta et al., 2001). A to- ineffective in protecting immature nuts from Xaj infec-
tally randomized experiment design was used for the as- tions (Fig. 1). P. vagans strain C9/1 reduced blight by
009_COST(Ozaktan)_S53_COL 15-06-2012 10:47 Pagina 55
Journal of Plant Pathology (2012), 94 (1, Supplement), S1.53-S1.56 Ozaktan et al. S1.55
Fig. 1. Biocontrol activity of tested bacterial antagonists against Xanthomonas arboricola pv.
juglandis on immature nut test.
40%, although it did not produce any inhibition zones and other bactericidal products (Serenade), and sys-
against Xaj. Strains WH48/1A and WH68 and that ef- temic acquired host resistance (SAR) compounds may
fectively inhibited Xaj on immature nuts plus a couple be proposed as control measures for bacterial blight of
of other efficient inhibitors (WH77/1, WH55/4) were walnut. With no proven alternatives for walnut blight
selected for seedling inoculation. Three out of the 4 control, investigating the potential of an antagonistic
tested antagonists and the two chemicals tested, signifi- bacteria-based biocontrol is warranted. Streptomyces ly-
cantly reduced symptom development on the walnut dicus strain WYEC 108 yielded a reduction of 85% of
leaves compared with the positive control. In particular, walnut bacterial blight (www.epa.gov/oppbppd1/
strain WH48/1A was the most effective (82% blight re- biopesticides). Bacteriophages of Xaj showed the ability
duction) followed by strain WH77/1 (55%). P. vagans of lysing all New Zealand isolates of the pathogen tested
C9/1 reduced blight by 71% and Prohexadione Ca by (Jenkins et al., 2010).
63%, a value comparable to that afforded by copper- Our tests have now shown that some strains of P. fluo-
based compound estimated at 57% reduction (Table 1). rescens were promising Xaj biocontrol agents, in accord
Walnut blight is currently controlled by multiple ap- with the suggestion that antagonistic bacteria isolated
plications of copper from bud break until the end of from healthy walnut plants may be better adapted to this
August (Gardan et al., 1993; Radix et al., 1998). Alter- species and provide better control of bacterial blight than
native control chemicals are few, and even more toxic, organisms isolated from other plant species. This re-
while no effective plant resistance has been identified. search showed also that the detached nut assay is a quick
Potential alternatives including bacterial antagonists and reliable method for screening promising Xaj biocon-
Fig. 2. P. fluorescens strains WH48/1A, WH39/1A, and WH68 (from left to the right) were the most effective for inhibition of Xaj
on immature nuts (left), compared to positive control (Xanthomonas arboricola pv. juglandis) (middle) and treated with sterile
water (right).
009_COST(Ozaktan)_S53_COL 15-06-2012 10:47 Pagina 56
S1.56 Biological control of X. aboricola pv. juglandis Journal of Plant Pathology (2012), 94 (1, Supplement), S1.53-S1.56
Table 1. Effect of some bacterial antagonist strains and chemicals for suppression of bacterial blight caused by
Xaj on walnut seedlings (cv. Chandler).
* Mean values for six replications of 2 walnut seedlings in each replicate block.
** Percentage of reduction in bacterial blight compared to walnut seedlings treated with water alone.
*** Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different according to Duncans Multiple
Range Test at P = 0.05.
trol agents. Additional studies are nevertheless needed Jenkins T.A., Marsh C., Lang M.D., Vanestre J., Walter M.,
for developing a suitable scale up production and appli- Obanor F., 2010. Walnut Blight Sustainable Management
cation to walnut orchards, in the hope to produce a fur- Research in New Zealand. Acta Horticulturae 861: 479-
487.
ther tool for the management of walnut blight.
Lelliott R.A., Billing E., Hayward A.C., 1966. A determinative
scheme for fluorescent plant pathogenic pseudomonads.
Journal of Applied Bacteriolology 29: 470-489.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
McNeil D.L., Romero S., Kandula J., Stark C., Larsen S.,
2001. Bacteriophages: a potential biocontrol agent against
This research was supported by the Scientific and walnut blight (Xanthomonas campestris pv. juglandis). New
Technical Research Council of Turkey (research project Zealand Plant Protection 54: 220-224.
TUBITAK#TOVAG 106O825) and Ege University Sci- Mulrean E.N., Schroth M.N., 1982. Ecology of Xanthomonas
ence#Technology Research and Application Center campestris pv. juglandis on Persian (English) walnuts. Phy-
(EBILTEM). We thank the COST#873 Action for sup- topathology 72: 434-438.
porting this short communication. zaktan H., Erdal M., Akkpr A., Bozkurt A., 2007. Evalua-
tion of susceptibility of some walnut cultivars to Xan-
thomonas arboricola pv. juglandis by immature nut test. Joint
REFERENCES Meeting of COST Action 873. Murcia, Spain: 6.
http://www.cost873.ch/_uploads/_files/m_ozaktan_murcia
Alet N., Ninot A., Moragrega C., Llorente I., Montesinos E., Palleroni N.J., 1984. Genus Pseudomonas. In: Krieg N.R.,
2001. Blight sensitivity of Juglans regia L. Spanish selec- Holt J. G. (eds). Bergeys Manual of Determinative Bacte-
tions. Acta Horticulturae 544: 353-362. riology, 3rd Ed., pp. 141-199. Williams & Wilkins, Balti-
Frutos D., 2010. Bacterial diseases of walnut and hazelnut more, MD, USA.
and genetic resources. Journal of Plant Pathology 92 : 79- Radix P., Bastien C., Jay-Allemand C., Charlot G., Seigle-Mu-
85. randi F., 1998. The influence of soil nature on polyphenols
Gardan L., Brault T., Germain E., 1993. Copper resistance of in walnut tissues. A possible explanation of differences in
Xanthomonas campestris pv. juglandis in French walnut or- the expression of walnut blight. Agronomie 18: 627-637.
chards and its association with conjugative plasmids. Acta Stanier R.Y., Palleroni N.J., Doudoroff M., 1970. The aerobic
Horticulturae 311: 259-265. pseudomonads: a taxonomy study. Journal of General Mi-
Jetiyanon K., Kloepper W.J., 2002. Mixtures of plant growth- crobioogy 43: 159-271
promoting rhizobacteria for induction of systemic resist- Vauterin L., Rademaker J., Swings J., 2000. Synopsis on the
ance against multiple plant diseases. Biological Control 24: taxonomy of the genus Xanthomonas. Phytopathology 90:
85-291. 677-682.