‘CONTRACT, = Brown & Root,.Inc. K-4245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA TDENTIFICATIONNO, P1004 ‘Approval Date pace 1 or 36 TITLE, CLIENT EQUATE INQUIRY NO. PROJECT _ETHYLENE PLANT LOCATION ___AL_SHUAIBA STATE OF KUWAIT ___CLIENT/JOB NO. KE-4245 ‘This cover page is arecord of all revisions ofthe procurement specification identified above by mummber and tile. All previous cover pages are hereby superseded and are to be destroyed. ae a nee rent: Page No: Dat By: Chk: Appr: Appr__: No Description 05-30-95: DP: DLP: DT Issued For Office Check 0 _:06-30-95:_DP. Ug [ssued For Design ISSUED FOR JUL 05 1995 ISSUED FOR JUL 05 1995 DESIGN CLIENT AEVIEW/COMMENT This specification isthe property of Brown & Root and Associsted Companies. It is furnished to establish requirements on ‘ paticular project and solely for that purpose. This specification is not intented for general circulation and shall not be reproduced or distributed without Brown & Root’s written permission.‘CONTRACT NO, €£ Brown & Root, Inc. KF-A245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA BEEREATONN ‘Approval Date racr_ 2 oF 36 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 10 SCOPE 4 2.0 REFERENCED DOCUMENTB......... oe e 4 3.0 REQUIREMENTZ....... 6 31 Stress Analysis Methods 6 3.2 Selection Criteria... 6 3.3 General Piping... 8 4.0 STRESS ANALYSIS ISOMETRICS........0.0seeneone esse 8 5.0 STRESS ANALYSIS PROCEDURE AND GUIDELINES . 8 6.0 COMPUTER PROGRAMG..... 10 7.0 STRESS ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS. ose aoe soo rnmneeneees 10 8.0 VIBRATION ANALYSIS (RECIPROCATING PUMPS/COMPRESSORS) 0... sen 13 9.0 NOZZLELOADS.. esteem enn 3 10.0 PIPE SUPPORTS AND GUIDES sen . 4 10.1 Support Span. ese 14 10.2 Support Design Considerations........ ese : —— 4 10.3. Pipe Guide Spacing esse seventeen : 15 11.0 HAND CALCULATIONS 16 12.0 DESIGN REPORT........ 16‘CONTRACT NO, GP Brown & Root, Inc. KP-4245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA Piggdemeres a ‘Approval Date PAGE 3 oF 36 APPENDICES PAGE A Pipe Support Span Charts. 7 B Carbon Steel and Stainless Steel Pressure Vessel Allowable Nozzle Loads 2 c API-Equipment; Allowable Nozzle Loads... 32 D Non - API Rotating Equipment; Allowable Nozzle Loads........ 34 E Isometric Handling Flowchart 35@ Brown & Root, Inc. Kra24s | CONTRACT NO. PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA IDENTIFICATION NO. P1004 1.0 2.0 SCOPE, This manual is prepared to assist piping engineers working on the EQUATE Projec ‘Approval i Date Pace 4 oF 36 in carrying out the task of pipe stress analysis in accordance with the guidelines and procedures presented here. It is intended to achieve the following objectives: To assure that all pipe stress analyses and pipe support design calculations comply with EQUATE Piping Engineering Standard and Materials Specification, and all applicable regulatory codes referenced within, To assure that all calculations are performed in accordance with uniform analysis procedures and methods, To establish that the stress analysis problems are properly reviewed to confirm validity of input, outputs and code compliance To provide the necessary communication so that the information such as pipe stress isometrics, support loads etc, are efficiently transmitted among piping engineering , piping design/drafting, mechanical and structural disciplines REFERENCED DOCUMENTS The editions of the following standards and codes shall be complied with where applicable to piping stress analysis: AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (ASME). B313 Chemical Plant & Petroleum Refinery Piping, 1993 Edition Including Addenda ‘a’ EQUATE K-PPM-520 - Above Grade Detailed Piping Design WELDING AND RESEARCH COUNCIL WRC-107 Local stresses in spherical and cylindrical shells due to external loadings.‘CONTRACT NO, €@S> Brown & Root, Inc. KR-D45 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA Poo a ‘Approval Date PAGES oF 36 . AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE (API) STD 610 Centrifugal Pumps for General Refinery Services, 1989 Edition. STD 617 Centrifugal Compressors for General Refinery Services, 1988 Edition. STD 618 Reciprocating Compressors for General Refinery Services, 1986 Edition, STD 560 _ Fired Heaters for General Refinery Service, 1986 Edition, STD 650 Welded Stee! Tanks for Oil Storage, 1993 Edition. STD 661 _Air-Cooled Heat Exchangers for General Refinery Services, 1992 Edition. STD611 General or Special Purpose Steam Turbine, 1988 Edition or 612 1987 Edition. STD 619 —_Rotary Positive Displacement Compressor, 1985 Edition. STD616 Gas Turbine, 1992 Edition. . AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (ASME) BOILER AND PRESSURE VESSEL CODE SECTION VIII, 1992 EDITION . NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (NEMA) SM.23 Steam Turbines for Mechanical Drive Service, 1991 Edition, . AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS ASCE-7, 1993 MINIMUM DESIGN LOADS FOR BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES (WIND LOADS)‘CONTRACT NO. BP Brown & Root, Inc. K-4245 ! PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA eel x ‘Approval - Date pact 6 oF 30 j 3.0 REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Stress Analysis Methods All piping on the project will be checked for sustained , occasional and thermal loads, » one of the following three methods: . Computer formal analysis (with Caesar II software) method . Hand calculations or . ‘Visual inspection per criteria in Appendix "A" 3.2 Selection Criteria ‘Computer Methods, Hand Calculations or Visual Inspection The piping engineer shall conduct a mandatory investigation of piping systems which meet fhe following selection criteria for formal computer analysis, other lines will be qualified by hand calculations/visual inspection, The piping engineer is allowed to utilize his judament in regards to not formally analyzing lines that meet this criteria or by analyzing lines that do not meet this criteria after reviewing the actual piping layouts, The piping systems, regardless of operating temperature or pressure, will be visually inspected using piping drawings/isometrics to determine that adequate flexibility exists so as to prevent overstress or fatigue (use criteria Pet appendix "A"). The piping engineers will locate supports and restraints to provide stability and prevent excessive pipe movement during any applicable load condition. ‘The Specific piping systems shall be tracked via the stress analysis line status presented in IPMS . 4 in. and smaller over 500 °F . . 6 in. and larger over 400°F and less than -20 °F. . Piping 16 in. diameter and larger . Lines having substantial concentrated loads such as valves fittings, unsupported vertical risers and branches . 3° and larger closed pressure relief system piping, where design temperature exceeds 200 °F or less than -20 °F. . ‘Lines having local reduction in strength due to installation of special fittingsCONTRACT NO. G® Brown & Root, Inc. RES PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA Caen ‘Approval Date PAGE 7 OF 36 (lf reducers, greater than one size change). : Piping 3" and larger connected to rotating equipment such as pumps, blowers, and compressors. . Gas and/or steam turbine piping . 3" and larger, air-fin cooler piping . Piping to reciprocating pumps and compressors (3" and larger) . Plate and frame heat exchanger piping (3" and larger) Blowdown and flare header piping . Piping with slug flow and two phase flow . All Process Piping connected to pressure vessels designed to ASME Section VIM, Division 2, with operating temperature of 150°F and over . Relief valve or rupture disc piping (reaction force hand calculations or with Caesar Tas required) : Unbalanced piping configuration, such as a long run of pipe with a short branch connected to anchor. . Piping subjected to high cyclic temperature conditions . Critical process lines. . All underground process lines at design temperatures exceeding 100 °F or design temperatures below 40 °F . Piping subject to short term variations such as steamout or purge piping. In addition, the piping effects of other conditions such as temperature gradients that could cause thermal bowing or where piping is connected to equipment with significant thermal growth may cause a piping engineer to analyze a line.‘CONTRACT, HS Brown & Root, Inc. KF=#245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA a ‘Approval Date Pace 8 oF 36 33 40 5.0 Sa a A formal computer analysis need not be performed on some of the piping systems, provided they meet one of the following requirements : Piping systems which are duplicates, or are revised without significant changes of successfully operating operations (ASME B31.3, Paragraph 319.4.1(a)) . Piping systems which can be readily judged adequate by comparison with previously analyzed systems (ASME B31.3, Para, 319.4.1(b)), or : Piping systems which can be analyzed using acceptable hand calculation or method presented in Appendix A. STRESS ANALYSIS ISOMETRICS Based on the stress analysis selection criteria, the Piping Engineer will prepare a stress analysis line list which will be submitted to the lead piping coordinator. Preliminary analysis will be performed utilizing hand drawn stress sketches, Comments, configuration changes, and support choices and locations will be transmitted to piping design, Stress isometrics will be downloaded from PDS as system isometrics. Piping engineering will review these isometrics vs. their original analysis. If required, reanalysis will be performed on these isometrics. For analyzed lines, the acceptability of final fabrication isometrics will be made in comparison to the final formal analysis. STRESS ANALYSIS PROCEDURE & GUIDELINES Each isometric will be documented in a stress analysis line list on IPMS and assigned an isometric number as shown below. Stress Isometrics - Assign sketch number, e.g. JT-100-001 JT- Lead Designer's initials 100- Cost Code Area Number 001- Line Number Sequence Number The line number of each line on the isometric shall be listed in the title of the stress isometric; see titleblock of B&R standard EF-084-46.65. If a stress isometric covers more than one area, then the cost area number for an area most representing the line shall be used.‘CONTRACT NO. | ED Brown & Root, Inc. KF-4245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA DETECATIONNO ‘Approval Date Pace 9 or 36 | $2 33 Calculation numbers shall be assigned as follows. Calculation Number - e.g, XXYYZZ. XX- The first two digits will be the P&ID area, e.g. 01,02, etc. YY- The middle two letters will be the system designation, eg, P,HS, etc Note: For the few three letter systems utilize the first two digits; e.g, HXS would be HX. If the system has only one letter just use that one letter, e.g. 02P01 ZZ~ The final two digits will be a sequence number, ie. 01, 02, 03, ete. The project is an imperial metric job. Pipe O.D.'s and insulation thicknesses are in English units. Pipe lengths, distances between supports, etc. are in metric units, Each analyst will document piping, properties, valves, material, and others stress analysis input data pertaining to each problem. Valve dimensional data and weights must be obtained from the valve cut-sheets prepared for use in piping design. It is necessary that the correct valve weights for each valve type are Secured from the selected valve suppliers for input to the analysis of critical piping systems, such as lines to/from gas compressors and pumps, and any piping system that requires spring hangers. Rod hangers should be avoided in fireproofed areas or within 15 feet of grade Use of expansion joints shall be limited Piping to be designed for differential setlement as defined by the civil group soil report. Based on the preliminary soil report information, 0.25" will be utilized for differential settlement between foundations. Lines, requiring analysis going to Battery Limits will be restrained to have negligible ‘movements at an anchor point agreed to near the Battery Limits, Use teflon slide plates up to 350 deg F when the distance from the slide plates to the pipe is equal to or Jess than the thickness of the insulation. If that distance is greater than the€@> Brown & Root, Inc. KR-245 ‘CONTRACT NO, PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA aE ‘Approval Date Pact 10 oF 36 6.0 7.0 thickness of the insulation, discuss the use of the teflon slide plates at temperatures higher than 350 deg F with the area lead. Upon completion of the problem, the Piping Engineer will review the output for technical acceptability and code compliance. Tris the Piping Engineer's responsibility to assure proper support and analysis of piping, where analysis shows support liftoff. Upset conditions will be utilized for analysis of piping systems, including nozzle load qualification. The key is meeting the Codes requirement for utilizing maximum/minimum pipe metal temperatures. COMPUTER PROGRAMS ‘The computer programs listed below will be employed to perform the types of analysis shown: NAME OF PROGRAM ANALYSIS TYPE, Caesar II (v3.21) Static and Dynamic Pipe Stress Analysis Caesar IL (v3.21a) Nozzle loads on vessels in accordance with WRC- 107 Caesar II (v3.21a) Nozzle loads on rotating equipment in accordance with NEMA and applicable API Standards STRESS ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS Piping systems will be analyzed forthe effects of static and dynamic loadings, as applicable to each stress analysis problem. The types of loads to be considered in the analysis for each individual case will be determined by the Piping Engineer. Operating load case (W+P+T+D) Deadweight load case (W+P) ‘Thermal case (T+)‘CONTRACTNO > Brown & Root, Inc. KPo245 ! PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA Po 5 “Approval Date race II or 36 | Occasional load case ‘Wind Speed 87 mph (140 km/hr) (N-S & E- and other load cases runs = Weight of pipe (and piping compoments), medium and insulation if any, Tntemnal design pressure operating temperature to have maximum range) D= Movement at equipment nozzles or anchor points ‘Temperature gradients (°F), (From installation 70°F or min. temperature to designcomer ZB Brown & Root, Inc. KF-#245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA ann ‘Approval — Date race 12 oF _36 Stress levels shall be checked as follows: “TYPE OF LOAD ANSI B31.3 REE. CODE | ALLOW.STRESS 1. SUS (W#P) 3023.5 SL3 t where, jo = Natural frequency of piping system and f= compression strokes of equipment If the criteria is not satisfied, relocation of pipe supports or redesign of piping configuration will be made to avoid resonance, Small diameter pipes should be gusseted or braced back to main pipe to avoid fatigue Analysis of the piping for the above criteria in conjunction with the analysis of vibration effects due to pulsating fluid flow is normally done by others NOZZLE LOADS The stress analyst will calculate the nozzle loading based on the condition that results in the minimum or maximum metal temperature, Nozzle loads on various items of equipment will be compared in accordance with the allowable loads furnished by equipment vendors or nozzle load criteria for various pieces of equipment (see Appendix C, or D for allowable loads), In case of multiple items of equipment connected to a common header, the rune will be made for one item running, others cold, to determine the maximum possible loading condition,(CONTRACT NO, ZB Brown & Root, Inc. KR-4245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA yaane ‘Approval — Date PaGE 14 oF 36 10.0 10.1 10.2 Per UCC standard PPM-520, loads for non-rotating equipment nozzles shall be submitted to the vendor if: 2) The resultant force is greater thatn 300 times the pipe nominal diameter or, +) The pipe stress at the nozzle location is more than 2/3 of the stress allowable. UCC also requires that nozzle qualification packages be submitted to them during the project. Details on this package will be developed later. PIPE SUPPORTS AND GUIDES Support Span Pipe support span charts, based on EQUATE piping specifications, deflection and stress criteria have been prepared (see Appendix B) for use on the project. Piping design and nsinecring personnel will locate the pipe supports based on these charts and the following considerations ; . Jn order to impart proper stability to @ piping system and to provide the necessary supports to meet their intended purposes, the following considerations will be included while locating piping supports In 8 properly designed piping system, the support load at different supports due to gravity load Will be approximately equal in magnitude and will always act downward. If a piping system 's improperly supported, the support reactions will be unequal or negative in magnitude (.¢., acting upward), A concentrated load, such as valve weight, may not only cause the pipe to Sag excessively, but may generate high dynamic loads (due to high wind velocities ete.) if not adequately supported and guided Latge diameter (Greater than 36") piping must be supported on pipe saddles if excessive point loading is determined to be causing a localized overstress situation in the lineBrown & Root, Inc. CONTRACTNO. KF-4245, PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA PIOO4 TDENTIFICATIONNO Approval Date PAGE, 15 oF 36 103 Pipe Guide Spacing SPACING (METERS) SIZE HORIZONTAL PIPE | ON LOOP ENDS VERT, ‘Up to 2" 12 6 8 3" 15 9 8 4" 18 12 9 6" 18 12 9 8" 12" 18 18 12 14" - 20" 24 18 2 24" UP 24 18 2CONTRACTNO, GE Brown & Root, Inc. KE-4245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA SaEREATON ‘Approval Date ract_16 or 36 | 11.0 12.0 HAND CALCULATIONS All original hand calculations related to flexibility analysis, branch reinforcement tl thickness and pipe support design will be properly documented and submitted to the -d Piping Engineer for filing, DESIGN REPORT After completion of pipe stress analysis and piping design related activities, a piping stress analysis report containing the following will be prepared by stress analyst and handed to piping stress lead: Cover Sheet Piping Data input (on stress isometric) Valve Data input (on stress isometric) All Hand Calculations needed for Input Assumption and Judgement, if necessary Computer Sketch (optional) Stress summary for code compliance (on stress isometric) Nozzle load summary (if required for vendor approval) Input print from CAESAR II Computer Output from CAESAR II Stress Isometric with Stress Comments (original) Equipment Sketches Other correspondance (Supplier approval of nozzle loading, soil analysis for tank settlement criteria, etc.) . 1.44 Mb floppy disk containing stress analysis program input files The report will be available to EQUATE for review and, subsequently, included in project documentation files.CONTRACT XO. a > Brown & Root, Inc. KF-4245 \ PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA SBENECATIONO ‘Approval ae Date race 17 or 36 | APPENDIX A PIPE SUPPORT SPAN CHARTSCONTRACTS. BS Brown & Root, Inc. KE-245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA Po “Approval — 7 Date pact 18 oF 36 APPENDIX A PIPE SUPPORT SPAN CHART PIPE SPAN-MAXIMUM (FILLED WITH WATER (meten)*¥* (Carbon Steel) Single Span Continuous Spans™™ w a “1 aan 3.0 34 “an 3 39 47 2 3 43 6 3 ain 49 70 4 4 87 18 70 6 aan 94 NOTE: 1) Span recommendations are intended for horizontal arrangements, but include no provision for weights (fittings, valves, flanges, etc.), 2) Limitation of 600 F temperature. 3) Spans should be reduced by 25% for horizontal changes of directions. 4) In general, concentrated loads (valves, pipe risers) may require nearby vertical supports.CONTRACT NO. BS Brown & Root, Inc. KF -4245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA Po nne = ‘Approval : i Date PAGE 19 oF 36 APPENDIX A. PIPE SUPPORT SPAN CHART (Carbon Steel) PIPE SPAN-MAXIMUM (FILLED WITH WATER (meter) ‘SINGLE SPAN (CONTINUOUS SPAN [sips 109 8 5 ae Tas 10 3 oA Tt 2 5 O77 a7 4 3 103 TF 16 3 106 146 18 3 13 149 20 3 a1 isa 4 3 13 152 30 and 36,€@> Brown & Root, Inc. ‘CONTRACT NO. KF-4245, PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA IENTIFICATIONNO PIO04 i ‘Approval Date Pace 20 of 36 | APPENDIX A PIPE SUPPORT SPAN CHART Single Span “11a in 34 55 ” 2 43 60 3 2 49 70 4 an 57 16 70 6 3 9a NOTE: 1) Span recommendations are intended for horizontal arrangements, but include no provision for weights (fittings, valves, flanges, etc.) 2) Limitation of 300 F temperature. 3) Spans should be reduced by 25% for horizontal changes of directions. 4) In general, concentrated loads (valves, pipe risers) may require nearby vertical supports.€@S Brown & Root, Inc. ‘CONTRACT NO, KF-4245 t PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA Poo ‘Approval Date Pact 21 oF sy APPENDIX A PIPE SUPPORT SPAN CHART (Stainless Steel) PIPE SPAN-MAXIMUM (FILLED WITH WATER (meter.) ‘SINGLE SPAN CONTINUOUS SPAN SIZE (in) THK (in) ios 3 79 105 8 3 Br 125 10 31a oF a4 R 3 OF 137 4 3 103 4 16 3 106 466 18 3 3 149 20 3 Tai 152 4 3 131 152 30 and 36CONTRACT NO. “s €@ Brown & Root, Inc. KEo245 | PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA. Picoienmee NO | ‘Approval = . Date pact 22 or 36 | APPENDIX B CARBON STEEL AND STAINLESS STEEL PRESSURE VESSEL ALLOWABLE NOZZLE LOADS‘CONTRACT NO. GD Brown & Root, Inc. KP245 PIPING STRES: IALYSIS CRITE] TDENTIFICATION NO. IGS S AN, SIS RIA. PI004 “Approval . Date PAGE 23 oF 36 APPENDIX B ALLOWABLE VESSEL/NOZZLE LOADS FOR CARBON STEEL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONAL LOADS NOM. _ [FLANGE [RADIAL [LONG. [CIRC [CIRC._ LONG. TORSION| Sie [CLASS [LOAD [SHEAR _|SHEAR_|MOMENT [MOMENT |MOMENT| inch ~ pound [pound pound |foot- _ffoot- _|foot- lpound [pound [pound 08 |150- 85] 85 EE 75 30] 20| 1300 (600. 85| a 35 77] 33 25| 1500 85) 85) 85 Z3| 46] 25] [2500 85 85] 85] 32] 64] 30] 0.75 |150- 725} 128] 725 28 Es] 35 1300 [600 128] 125138) 26| 3] a5] 1500 125] 125) 125] 40] 80] 50] [2500 i125) _125|___128| 5a) 116 5a] 7.00 |i60- i70| 170 770] aa] a] 65 1300 [600 170; 170| 179] a] EE) Eq 1500, 170| 170170] 68136) 95] [2500 170] 170| 170 “i02} 208] tos} 7.50 [T60- 258] 258] 265] 72|___t43l 768] 300 [600 255| 265] 265) 92| 183208] 1500 255[ 258] 255| 144! 289] 255} [2500 255{ 255] 255] 224448] 300} 2.00 |160- 348] S45, 34] eal 175) 280) 1300 [600 345[348| 345] T48[ 290 a6] 1500) 345[ 348" 345] 271[ 642] 490] [2500 345 345[ 348] 433] @66] 585] 3.00 [i60- 515,815] __616| 264] 607] 60| 300 (600 Sis] 815| 518] 412| _a2a]_ 1178] 900 Sis] 518{ 51s] 412) 624] 1175] 1500 Sis] Si5| 518] 701] 1402] 1440] [2500 Sis] 518] 575] 1118] 2238] 1745]Brown & Root, Inc. (CONTRACT NO. KF-4245 PIPING STRESS ANALYSIS CRITERIA. ENTIFICATION NO PIO04 Approval Date Pace 24 oF 36 ALLOWABLE VESSEL/NOZZLE LOADS FOR OPERATIONAL LOADS APPENDIX B CARBON STEEL CONSTRUCTION NOM. [FLANGE TRADIAL LONG. [CIRC. CIRC. LONG. TORSION) Size CLASS _|LOAD_"|SHEAR__|SHEAR__|MOMENT|MOMENT I MOMENT| Inch - pound pound [pound |foct- ffoot- foot lpound _|pound [pound 4.00 |750- 690[630[—-690)__ 419] a3] 7608] 300 [600 690| 690] 690| 742] 1433] 2738) 800) 690|690[ 6907042] 2083] 2590} 1500 690] 630] 690] 1368! 2730] 2960] [2500 630] 680[ 630] 2626} 6253] 3850] 6.00 |150- T038[1038{ 1038 sai] teaa] 4250] 300 [600 4035] 1036 7035] 1828} 3656 6170] 900) 1038[1036| 1038] 2702] 5404] 7480] 1500. 1038| 1036] 1035] 4961} 9922] 10010] [2500 1038] 1036] 71035] 7031] 74062] 11560] 6.00 |750- 1388[ 1388|__1386| i712] 3404) e406] 1300 (600. 1385] 1386[ 7385| 3380} 6760] 12266] 900) 1385] 1365|1385| 5814] 11628] 16310] 1500 1388 1385|1385| 9315] _18629| 20530] [2500 1385] 1385] 1385] 16000| 31999] 25800] 10.00 |150- 1728|4728| _1728[ 2838] 5679] 14980] 1300 [600 i725] 1728 1725|_6086| _12112| 22610} 900 1728 1725| 172870271] _20842| 30190] 1500 1728| 1726] 1728| 18086 36112] 39830] [2500 1728| 4728] 1725] 31023 _62046| 50016] 12.00 [750 - 207820782078] 3760] 7515] 21910] 300 [600 2075|2078| 2075] 9717} 19434] 37510} [900 2075[ 2078] 2075| 14256] 28512] 50326] 1500 2076| 2078|2075| 27059] 54117] 63240] [2500 2075] 2078] _2075| 48766} 97533] 81645]