Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 17

American Peace Flag

Michael Joseph Watson


3697 Newport St.
Denver, Colorado U.S.A.
[NEW STATES POSTAL ZONE: 80207]

August 3, 2015

To: Prosecuting Attorney


Brock R. Belnap
33 North 100 West Suite 200
St. George, Utah [84770]
Ph. (435) 634-5723
Fx. (435) 634-5720
And...
Deputy Washington County Attorney
Rachael Beckstrom
33 North 100 West Suite 200
St. George, Utah [84770]
Ph. (435) 634-5723
Fx. (435) 634-5720

RESPONSE REQUIRED

RE: Incorporated Case #: 151700614

AFFIDAVIT
I, Michael Joseph Watson, am more than twenty-one (21) years of age and fully competent to testify to the facts
stated herein to which I have direct and personal knowledge. The facts testified to are the truth, whole truth, and
nothing but the truth.

NOTICE
Responsibility disclaimer under U.C.C. 3-501: Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (hereafter known as
F.R.C.P.) Rule 38(a). The Case Titled above is under Title 4 U.S.C. 1 AMERICAN FLAG OF PEACE, of the
united States of America, under Presidential Execution Order 10834. No titles of NOBILITY under any Foreign
Flag jurisdiction and in Breach of Article (1), Section (9), of the Constitution for the united States of America, will
be allowed in the jurisdiction of this Case.

1
Breach of this contract will cause sanctions under F.R.C.P- Rule 16(f). When the constitution of the united States of
America is surrendered to a foreign jurisdiction, then charges of perjury of oath (Title 18 U.S.C. Section 1621),
Constructive Treason, and contempt for the Constitution for the united States of America, and False Swearing
will be brought against the Officers of the Court responsible.

CITIZEN IN PARTY IS STATING: Without due process of the law, pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. 1986 for
KNOWLEDGE of the LAW, required by Law, for not correcting and stopping a wrong as against the CITIZEN IN
PARTY by the PROSECUTING ATTORNEY titled above, under FRAUD F.R.C.P Rule 9(b).

CITIZEN IN PARTY is accusing the prosecuting attorney, Brock R. Belnap whose British Accredited Registry
(B.A.R.) No. is: 6179 and Deputy Washington County Attorney, Rachael Beckstrom whose British Accredited
Registry (B.A.R.) No. is: 9689 of FRAUD AND CONDITION OF MIND under F.R.C.P. Rule 9(b) and FAILURE
TO JOIN F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b) (7), FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM, F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b) (6), PROCESS OF
SERVICE F.R.C.P. 12(b) (5), SERVICE OF PROCESS F.R.C.P. 12(b) (4), WRONG VENUE, F.R.C.P. 12(b)
(3), LACK OF JURISDICTION OVER THE PARTY BEFORE THE COURT (No disclaimer of responsibility of
the Court upon the party U.C.C. 3-501) F.R.C.P. 12(b) (2), NO SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OVER THE
SUBJECT MATTER BEFORE THE COURT F.R.C.P. 12(b) (1) and SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO JOIN
F.R.C.P. 16(f) with the American Flag of Peace of the united States of America, Title 4 U.S.C. 1, as sworn to in the
prosecuting Attorney's OATH AND AFFIRMATION of the Constitution of the united States of America.

Prosecuting Attorney(s), Brock R. Belnap and Rachael Beckstrom caused injury to the CITIZEN IN PARTY
Michael Joseph Watson under CONSPIRACY, Title 42 U.S.C. 1985 (1) and causing a DEPRIVATION OF
RIGHTS under COLOR OF LAW, Title 18 U.S.C. 242, and PERJURY OF OATH pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C.
1621, and OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, Title 18 U.S.C. 1512.

And...

CAPIAS WARRANTS when issued without the aid of a Neutral Magistrate with a Show Cause hearing have been
declared illegal and unlawful in Crane vs. STATE OF TEXAS-19S5-Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals:

(1) Person issuing WARRANT improperly loses Corporate Limited Liability.

(2) County in which the WARRANT was improperly issued, loses Corporate Limited Liability.

(a) Prosecuting Attorney(s) Brock R. Belnap and Rachael Beckstrom has no legislative enactment clause for
the nature of this charge making it into law.
(b) Prosecuting Attorney(s) Brock R. Belnap and Rachael Beckstrom has no legislative enactment clause for
the creation of the Office of Lawyer, Counselor, Attorney, Esquire.

2
(c) Prosecuting Attorney(s) Brock R. Belnap and Rachael Beckstrom has a sworn oath of Office to uphold the
Constitution of the united States of America and my rights in said Constitution of the united States of
America.
(d) Prosecuting Attorney(s) Brock R. Belnap and Rachael Beckstrom does NOT have a signed Contract
containing his/her signature and my signature in which an agreement was reached to give my Constitutional
Rights away to him for him/her to violate his/her OATH OF OFFICE.
(e) Prosecuting Attorney does have a true name, Address, and Phone number.
(f) Prosecuting Attorney(s) Brock R. Belnap and Rachael Beckstrom does have a BOND NUMBER and a
BONDING COMPANY that can be taken for failure to rebut all of the above with Controverting Evidence.

Failure by the above Prosecuting Attorney(s) Brock R. Belnap and Rachael Beckstrom to rebut any or all of the
above AFFIDAVIT of TRUTH with Controverting Evidence of Truth in ten (10) Days is acquiescence to its truth
and validity and can be used as evidence in further action taken.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.

Respectfully Submitted

By: ___________________________
Michael Joseph Watson

Witness One

_________________________
James D. Hardin
3697 Newport St.
Denver, Colorado U.S.A.
[NEW STATES POSTAL ZONE 80207]
Ph.

Witness Two

_________________________
Brandi Leah Hardin
3697 Newport St.
Denver, Colorado U.S.A.
[NEW STATES POSTAL ZONE 80207]

3
_________________________________________

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
with FACTS & LAW
_________________________________________

4
5
On The Title 4 U.S.C. 1,
American Flag of Peace of the united States of America
THE FLAG, AS WITH ALL THINGS IN LAW, IS
HIGHLY DEFINED
On June 14, 1776, Congress made the following resolution:

The flag of the United States shall be thirteen stripes, alternate red and white,
with a union of thirteen stars of white on a blue field

Because Congress made no rule for the arrangement of the stars, they were
displayed in different ways, most usually in a circle. As new states joined the
Union, they demanded representation in the stars and stripes of the flag. In
1795 Congress voted to increase to 15 the number of stars and stripes.
Legislation enacted in 1818 reestablished the number of stripes at 13, and
instituted the policy, to wit:

That on the admission of every new state into the Union, one star be
added to the Union of the flag....

An executive order issued by President William Howard Taft on October 29, 1912,
fixed the overall width and length of the U.S. flag, known technically as the hoist and
fly, respectively, in a ratio of 1: 1.9. The thirteen stripes were fixed at equal width.

The hoist of the blue field containing the stars was fixed at seven-thirteenths of the
overall hoist, that is, as extending from the top of the flag to the bottom of the seventh
stripe. The fly of the blue field was fixed at a tiny fraction over three-fourths the
overall hoist. The diameter of each star was established as a minute fraction under
one-sixteenth of the overall hoist.

Currently, the Flag of the united States of America is defined at title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 and
Presidential Executive Order 10834, found in the Federal Register at Vol. 24. No. 166,
P. 6365-6367. The American Flag of Peace of the united States of America is
described as red, white and blue, with thirteen alternating red and white horizontal
stripes, and a blue field (union) with 50 stars, one to represent each of the several
States.

The Flag is proportional, (1 X 1.9). This proportion is easily determined by


measuring the length (fly) and dividing by the measurement of the width (hoist). The
length divided by the width should be very nearly 1.9. If the flag is not to the correct

6
1 X 1.9 proportion, it is not a title 4 U.S.C. 1,2 American Flag of Peace of the united
States of America.

THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO PROVISIONS IN THE LAW FOR ADDING A


FOURTH COLOR (YELLOW FRINGE) TO THE TITLE 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 FLAG.

Title 4 U.S.C. 3 provides that anything put on the Title 4 U.S.C. 1,2 Flag (gold fringe)
MUTILATES the Flag, and carries a one-year prison term. This is confirmed by the
authority of title 36 U.S.C. 176 (G). The gold fringe is the fourth color and represents
color of law, and, when placed on the title 4 U.S.C. 1,2 Flag, mutilates the Flag and
suspends the organic Constitution for the United States of America, and establishes
color of law. (Refer to Title 18 U.S.C. 242. Also See Blacks Law Dictionary).

As provided by Title 36 U.S.C. 173, and Army Regulation 840-10, chapter 2-1(b), the
Flag of the united States of America is defined and described in title 4 U.S.C. 1,2.
Civilians must use the title 4 U.S.C. 1,2 Flag (See Title 36 U.S.C. 173 and Army
Regulation 840-10, chapter 2-7) and when military flags are displayed by Army
Regulation 840-10, chapter 2 and title 36 U.S.C. 175.

THE ONLY AUTHORITY FOR A FRINGE ON THE FLAG IS IN THE ARMY


REGULATIONS FOR THE NATIONAL (MILITARY) FLAGS ONLY.

The U.S. Attorney General has stated:

The placing of a gold fringe on the National flag, the dimensions of the flag,
and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled
by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander-in-
Chief of the Army and Navy. . . ancient custom sanctions the use of fringe on
regimental colors and standards, but there seems to be no good reason or
precedent for its use on other flags. . . the use of such a fringe is prescribed in
current Army Regulations, No. 260-10. (See 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483 & 485).

The only statute or regulation, in the United States, prescribing a yellow fringed
United States flag is Army Regulation No. 260-10, making it a military flag.

By army regulation 260-10, the gold fringe may be used only on regimental colors,
the Presidents flag, for military courts martial, and the flags used at military
recruiting centers.

A military flag emblem of a nation, usually made of cloth and flown from a
staff; FROM A MILITARY STANDPOINT flags are of two general classes
those flown from stationary masts over army posts, and those carried by troops

7
in formation. The former are referred to by the general name of flags. The
latter are called colors when carried by dismounted troops. COLORS AND
STANDARDS are more nearly square than flags, and are made of silk, with a
knotted FRINGE OF YELLOW ON THREE SIDES... USE OF A FLAG --
THE MOST GENERAL AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE FLAG IS AS A
NATIONAL SYMBOL OF AUTHORITY AND POWER (National
Encyclopedia, Vol. 4)

The adornments on the top of the flag pole are for military use only. The gold eagle is
for the use of the President of the United States only, and only in time of war. (Or
when he is standing as Commander-in-Chief of the military, having declared Martial
Law, and suspended the Constitution). The gold spear ball is for military recruiting
centers only. The gold acorn is for military parades only. (Army Regulation 840-10,
chapter 8).

In Websters Dictionary, the word Colors is defined as:

A flag, ensign, or standard borne in an army or fleet. (Websters, 1971).

Blacks Law Dictionary defines Color as:

Color An appearance, semblance, or simulacrum, as distinguished from that


which is real. A prima facie or apparent right. Hence, a deceptive appearance;
a plausible, assumed exterior, concealing a lack or reality; a disguise or pretext.
(Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.)

U.S. Case Law defines Color of law as follows:

Color of law The appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal


right. Misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only
because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state, is action taken under
color of state law. Colorable That which is in appearance only, and not in
reality, what it purports to be, hence counterfeit, feigned, having the appearance
of truth. (Windel v. Flinn, 251 P 2d 136, 146).

This, of course is done, for purposes of Fraud and of Colorable alteration, to wit: One
which makes no real or substantial change, but is introduced only as a subterfuge or
means of evading the patent or copyright law.

Back in Blacks we also find Colorable Imitation, to wit:

8
Colorable imitation In the law of trademarks, this phrase denotes such a close
or ingenious imitation as to be calculated to deceive ordinary persons. (Blacks
Law 6th).

The Title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 American Flag of the united States of America takes
precedence over all other flags, as it is the superior flag, and establishes the
jurisdiction of the united States of America, and the laws made in pursuance thereof.

THE LAW OF THE FLAG

The Law of the Flag, an International Law, which is recognized by every nation of the
planet, is defined as:

...a rule to the effect that a vessel is a part of the territory of the nation whose
flag she flies. The term is used to designate the right under which a ship owner,
who sends his vessel into a foreign port, gives notice by his flag to all who
enter into contracts with the ship master that he intends the Law of that Flag to
regulate those contracts, and that they must either submit to its operation or not
contract with him or his agent at all. (Ref. Ruhstrat v. People, 57 N.E. 41)

By the doctrine of four cornering: the flag establishes the law of the country that it
represents. For example, the embassies of foreign countries, in Washington, D.C., are
four cornered by walls or fencing, creating an enclave. Within the boundaries of
the enclave of the foreign embassy, the flag of that foreign country establishes the
jurisdiction and law of that foreign country, which will be enforced by the Law of the
Flag and international treaty. If you enter an embassy, you will be subject to the laws
of that country, just as if you board a ship flying a foreign flag, you will be subject to
the laws of that flag, enforceable by the master of the ship, (Captain), by the law
of the flag.

Under Article IV, section 3, of the organic Constitution for the United States of
America (1787), no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of
any other State. So -- why have the Germans been allowed to erect a German
enclave at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico, under the Law of the Flag? Why
have the judges of the State and Federal Courts been allowed to erect foreign
enclaves within our courthouses under the foreign flag of the yellow fringe on the soil
of our Republic?

The flags displayed in State courts and courts of the United States have gold or yellow
fringes. It is your warning that you are entering a foreign enclave and will be subject
to the jurisdiction of that flag. The flag of the gold or yellow fringe has no

9
constitution, no laws, and no rules of court, and is not recognized by any Nation on
the earth, and is foreign to this Republic and the united States of America.

When you enter a courtroom displaying a gold or yellow fringed flag, you have just
entered into a foreign country, and you had better have your passport with you, you
may not be coming back. The judge under a gold or yellow fringe flag become the
captain or master and has absolute power to make the rules as he goes.

The gold or yellow fringe flag is your warning that you are leaving your
constitutionally secured rights at the door, to wit:

It is an elementary rule of pleading, that a plea to the jurisdiction is a tacit


(silent) admission that the court has a right to judge in the case and is a waiver
to all exception to the jurisdiction. (Girty v. Logan, 6 Bush KY. 8)

You can watch over the ramparts by the dawns early light, with bombs bursting in the
air, until you go blind, but you will not see a title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 Flag with its bright
stars and broad stripes. When the flags are gone, the Country is gone!

You may see something that looks like an American Flag, (a colorable flag, a
colorable alteration or imitation) but it is a shortened National Flag, for military use
only. Take your tape measure and calculator to determine what kink of a flag it is.

Five will get you ten that its proportion is 1 X 1.66 or 1 X 1.5. It looks like a duck,
walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, but it aint a duck. It is something far more
insidious and hedonistic! Far more Treacherous and Far more Seditious!

Why do private businesses display National Flags with military adornments on the
flag pole? Why do banks display gold or yellow fringed flags, with gold adornments,
in their lobbies? Is McDonalds competing with the Army recruiters? Why do
churches display military flags? Tell me the truth ye Church of Mormon(s)! Does
your Church have a pastor, or chaplain? Why have military colors been placed in
our public schools? Why are our children being taught under martial law, in a foreign
or military enclave with no constitutionally secured rights, under the Law of the
Flag? A military or foreign flag, displayed without the presence of a title 4 U.S.C. 1,
2 Flag suspends the Constitution, by the International law of the flag.

The Attorney General issued an Opinion on the matter, to wit:

Flag - Martial law The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the
dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters

10
of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President
as Commander In Chief of the Army and Navy. 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483.

And...

The use of such a fringe is prescribed in current Army Regulation, No. 260-
10. 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 483, 485.

And...

Ancient customs sanctions the use of the fringe on regimental colors and
standards, but there seems to be no good reason or precedent for its use on
other flags. The Adjutant General of the Army, Mar. 28, 1924, (1925) 34 Ops.
Atty. Gen. 483, 485.

Display of Military Flag

Flag - Martial Law 2-3. Sizes and Occasions for Display.


b. National flags listed below are for indoor display and for use in ceremonies and
parades. For these purposes the United States flag will be rayon banner cloth, trimmed
on three sides with golden yellow fringe, 2 1/2 inches wide. It will be the same size as
the flags displayed or carried with it.
c. Authorization for indoor display
4. Each military courtroom. [The municipal Courts of the State Republic???] 1-6.
Restrictions. The following limitations and prohibitions are applicable to flags,
guidons, streamers, and components.
e. Unauthorized use of official flags, guidons, and streamers. Display or use of flags,
guidons, and streamers or replicas thereof, including those presently or formerly
carried by U.S. Army units, by other than the office, individual, or organization for
which authorized, is prohibited except as indicated in (3) below, to wit:

(3) Recognized United States Army division associations... United States


Army Regulation AR 840-10, October 1, 1979.

The month the present case is set for seems most appropriate, as a SIGN or The
Times for it was under the EIGHTH month also that Presidential Executive Order
10834 was issued, to wit:

Flag - Martial Law Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, 1, 2, & 3; Executive


Order 10834, August 21, 1959, 24 F.R. 6865, a military flag is a flag that
resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW

11
FRINGE border on three sides. The President of the United States designates
this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as
Commander-in-Chief.

And...

Flag - The flag of the United States shall be thirteen horizontal stripes,
alternating red and white; and the union of the flag shall be forty-eight stars,
white in a blue field. 61 Stat. 642, July 30, 1947, ch. 389. 4 U.S.C.A. 1. (This
describes the civil flag of the United States as it is to be flown in the District of
Columbia, its enclaves and overseas on ships and embassies.)

Flag of the United States: Army Regulation 840-10 update

2-1. Authorization
(a) The flag of the United States is the symbol of our nation. The union white stars on
a field of blue, is the honor point of the flag. The union of the flag, and the flag itself
when in company with other flags, is always given the honor position: for example,
the marching right, the flags own right, or an observers left facing the flag.

BUT MOST OF ALL, WHY DO CIVILIAN COURTS DISPLAY MILITARY OR


FOREIGN FLAGS?

WHY DO CIVILIAN JUDGES CONDUCT COURTS MARTIAL FOR


CIVILIANS?

Under martial law, you are presumed guilty until proven innocent.

WHY ARE THERE NO MANUFACTURERS THAT PRODUCE CORRECT TITLE


4 U.S.C. 1 FLAGS? (TRY TO BUY ONE OF LAWFUL SIZE 3 X 5)

AMERICA HAS BEEN CONQUERED, AND BY TACIT ADMISSION, THE


PEOPLE HAVE SURRENDERED!!!

Defendant, Michael Joseph Watson is also under a solemn Oath and Affirmation as a
Marine! While Watsons Service Agreement indicates Retired and 100%
Disabled, Watsons Oath to PROTECT & DEFEND, the People and the Constitution
of the united States of America and with all due respect, Watson has not in the past,
the present, nor at anytime in the future shall he surrender his people, his Nation, nor
his FREE FLAG OF PEACE and further states and declares, should he fall at anytime,
when as now, He is acting in the capacity of Flag Bearer, to wit:

12
FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES. By the act entitled "An act to establish the flag of the United
States," (Rev.St. 1791, 1792), it was provided "that, from and after the fourth day of July next, the
flag of the United States be thirteen horizontal stripes, alternate red and white; that the union be
twenty stars, white in a blue field; that, on the admission of every new state into the Union, one star
be added to the union of the flag; and that such addition shall take effect on the fourth day of July
then next succeeding such admission." See Act July 30, 1947, c. 389, 1, 2, 61 Stat.. 641; 4 U.S.C.A.
1, 2.

And...
BEARER. One who bears, carries, or holds a thing. Defined by the Negotiable Instruments Act as
the person in possession of a bill or note which is payable to bearer. Miller v. People's Say. Bank, 193
Mo.App. 498, 186 S.W. 547, 550. When a check, note, draft, etc., is payable to "bearer," it imports
that the contents thereof shall be payable to any person who may present the instrument for
payment. Thompson v. Perrine, 106 U.S. 589, 1 S.Ct. 564, 568, 27 L. Ed. 298 and (BLACKS LAW
DICT. 4TH ED.).

Who among you are able to say, FOR GOD AND FOR COUNTRY, I AM? Who
among you can say without fear, in faith and absent his/her fear of spilling their own
blood, or the loss of life?

THE OBLIGATION COME FROM THE GOD WHOSE NAME WAS GIVEN TO
BOTH MOSES AND TO THE EGYPTIANS, SAYING TO MOSES: GO AND
TELL THEM THE GOD WHOSE NAME IS I AM THAT I AM HATH SENT
YOU! MOSES WAS SENT BY GOD, SAYING: LET MY PEOPLE GO! MOSES
WAS CHOSEN BY GOD, TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF HIS (GODS) PEOPLE...

MOSES WAS GODS MAN, CHOSEN AS GODS SPEAKER FOR GODS


PEOPLE, MOSES WAS A GIFT OF GOD, GIVEN TO HIS CHOSEN BY HIS
SERVANT MOSES, in days and times long ago passed, COMMANDING US, TO
GO FORTH AND MAKE STRAIGHT THE WAY OF THE LORD AND
TESTIFYING TO WHAT IS RITE AND TRUE! The foundation of Gods throne,
is: RIGHTEOUSNESS and JUSTICE. WHEREFORE, BOTH MUST BE
RESTORED!

And...

God has promised Watson with regards to those who oppose him, saying:

They may act, but not by me! (Isaiah )

When two nations go to war, the object of the game is to capture the other guys flag.
When you go onto foreign soil, take the other guys flag down and put yours up, you

13
have captured the other guys territory and put it under the law (Constitution) of your
flag.

Sun Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher and general, said that when the Art of War
is brought to its highest pinnacle, the enemy will be conquered without the opposing
armies ever having met in the field. By skillfully using the art of deception, and
skillful use of agents to infiltrate the enemys government, the enemy may be
conquered without the enemy ever knowing that it had been conquered.

WE HAVE BEEN CONQUERED! WHERE IS THE VFW? WHERE ARE THE


VETERANS THAT PAID SO HIGH A PRICE FOR THE TITLE 4 U.S.C. 1,2
AMERICAN FLAG AND THE LIBERTY AND COUNTRY THAT IT
REPRESENTS? WILL THESE MEN WHO SACRIFICED SO MUCH CONTINUE
TO CONSENT TO THE FALL OF OUR NATION BY THEIR CONTINUED
SILENCE? HAVE THEY CAPITULATED BY TACIT AGREEMENT?

Capitulation The act or agreement of surrendering upon negotiated or simulated terms.


(Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.)

Tacit Existing, inferred, or understood without being openly expressed or stated,


implied by silence or silent acquiescence, as a tacit agreement or tacit understanding.
Done or made in silence, implied or indicated, but not actually expressed. Manifested
by the refraining from contradiction or objection, inferred from the situation and
circumstance, in the absence of express matter. (Black Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.)

Tacit admissions An acknowledgment or concession of a fact inferred from either


silence or from the substance of what one has said.

Maxims of Law Tacita quaedam habentur pro expressis THINGS UNEXPRESSED


ARE SOMETIMES CONSIDERED AS EXPRESSED.

CONCLUSION

Our elected officials, judges, county commissioners, city councils, school boards and
school administrators, police, State Legislators, Governor, the U.S. Congress, and
even the President have all committed acts of CONSTRUCTIVE TREASON, defined
as:

...an attempt to establish treason by circumstantiality, and not by the


simple genuine letter of the law, and therefore is highly dangerous to
public freedom. C.J.S., vol. 87, p. 910)

14
The FRAUD complained of, either knowingly or unknowingly, against the People of
the united States of America by surrendering the American Flag of Peace of the united
States of America to the foreign state/power of the yellow fringe flag and erecting
foreign enclaves on the soil of the several States in breach of Article IV, section 3.
When all of the title 4 U.S.C. 1, 2 American Flags are gone, our country, the united
States of America and our precious constitutions are gone.

If the flag is not important, why, then, did an entire battalion of Marines, in early
1942, die to the last man on Wake Island defending the flag against the Japanese?
These Marines did not surrender the flag!

In early 1942, in the Philippines, a young officer named Lt. Ramsey, under the
command of Gen. Wainwright, led the last mounted cavalry charge in the history of
the U.S. Army. Lt. Ramsey and his men fought so viciously and with such
determination that, against overwhelming odds, the Japanese were routed, buying
precious time to enable the American forces to retreat to the peninsula of Bataan.

When the American forces were finally forced by starvation to surrender to the
Japanese, Lt. Ramsey refused to surrender and slipped through the Japanese lines with
a handful of his men and continued to make war against the Japanese with the
Philippine Army. By hiding in the mountains and jungle, Lt. Ramsey, though poorly
equipped, was able to train a guerrilla army and wreak havoc on the Japanese until
Gen. McArthur returned. Lt. Ramsey did not surrender his flag!

DEFINITION

Constructive Treason
Officers that swear an oath and affirmation for supporting and defending the organic
Constitution for the United States of America, and by surrendering the oath and
affirmation to the foreign state/power of the foreign yellow or gold fringe flag,
causing the party before the court a deprivation of rights, with will of intent by the
judge, by overt acts to surrender the organic Constitution for the United States of
America (1787) into the hands of a foreign power/state, by definition, is guilty of
constructive treason.

Treason imputed to a person by law from his conduct or course of action, though his
deeds taken severally do not amount to actual treason.

See Flag Code, Etiquette and Laws

How does your flag measure up?

15
Title 4 of the United States Code describes the specifications of the OFFICIAL United
States Flag and yet up until now, there have been no OFFICIAL flags made available
to the citizens of our country, no not in one government building!

If the U.S. Code defines the specific design of the official U.S. Flag, then what
statement are we making when we fly a flag that does not represent our country...the
United States???

THEREFORE, for the reasons and arguments shown, made and stated above herein, it
is hereby demanded that the lawful Title 4, Sec. 1, National Flag be returned to its
rightful and proper place in the courts and wherever else the same shall be flying, if a
title 4, Sec. 1 American flag of peace.

16
AFFIDAVIT USE
AND INSTRUCTIONS

1. This Document is very important in its use as it refuses the Attorneys efforts to get you to try to enter in as
a third party when he has sued you in one of the courts - When you are sued, issued a ticket, or addressed by an
Attorney of a Government Agency or a Corporation, simply send this document to the Attorney, Lawyer,
Counselor1 Esquire that has addressed you.

2- NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, address a response to the Court or Judge for the Attorney has a CONTRACT
with the Court and Judge to make you do whatever you are being accused of. Simply type or write this
AFFIDAVIT to the Lawyer, Attorney, Counselor, Esquire that is trying to get you to enter into this Cause or Case as
a Third Party to a Contract that already exists between the Court and the Attorney. Put the Cause or Case Number
on the Affidavit, NEVER the Court or Judge, enter a copy into the Court records but the original goes to the
Attorney, Prosecuting Attorney, Lawyer, Counselor, Esquire and him/her alone-

3. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, discuss Subject Matter with anyone after you file this into the records and it is
sent to the Attorney. It anyone calls; Attorney, Counselor, Lawyer, Esquire, Judge, Bailiff, simply state, I cannot
discuss anything with you, "I DON'T HAVE A CONTRACT WITH YOU". Then hang up. You may at this time
get a Summons Order from the Judge of the Court. Simply "REFUSE FOR FRAUD" (See next paragraph (4)) and
return it to the Judge and the Lawyer, Counselor, Attorney1 Esquire for they do not have a CONTRACT WITH
YOU and the Judge is trying to assist the Lawyer to obtain. The Judge has no power over you until you give
him/her your name or you get an Attorney or you try to address the Subject Matter before his/her Court.

4. Any documents you receive after filing this AFFIDAVIT with the Lawyer, Attorney, Counselor, Esquire,
simply "REFUSE FOR FRAUD" Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b), which is Fraud and Condition of Mind;
U.C.C. 3-501, which is No Contract; U.C.C. 3-505, which is Produce the Contract; F.R.C.P- 10(a), which is a
Fictitious Name.

5. This AFFIDAVIT must be answered by the Attorney, Lawyer, Counselor, Esquire by AFFIDAVIT,
rebutting with Controverting (Solid, factual1 and provable)evidence to each point raised in this AFFIDAVIT. They
can never answer this AFFIDAVIT for they are in a FOREIGN JURISDICTION and they do not have SUBJECT
MATTER JURISDICTION. You are in a Judicial setting which is Constitutional and you are under the American
Peace Flag and they are under the Gold Fringed Flag. They are also committing Barratry on every point they raise,
for from the beginning they have addressed you with a F.R.C.P- 10(a) Fictitious Name-

6. Be sure and place your AMERICAN PEACE FLAG on your AFFIDAVIT in the upper left hand Corner to
the left of your name and address as you are looking at the page. Also place the AMERICAN PEACE FLAG on
the copy that you enter into the Court Records. This now places this document into the Court Records as an
INCORPORATED CASE OR CAUSE and now it becomes your document and you are the movant of the Cause or
Case. You simply "REFUSE FOR CAUSE" from that point on. They must gain SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION over you and you are the only one who can give it to them. They will try to trick you in many
ways, simply "REFUSE FOR CAUSE", any paper work sent to you from anyone(unless you get a dismissal with
prejudice the original suit brought), then you do nothing. On any Phone Calls, simply ask the caller(and record the
conversation if possible)(tell them you are recording)what jurisdiction he/she are under at that time. They will
either hang up or try to get you to discuss Subject Matter.

17

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi