Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 10

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Acute Headache Presentations to the


Emergency Department: A Statewide
Cross-sectional Study
Kevin H. Chu, MBBS, GCBiostat, MS, FACEM, Tegwen E. Howell, BEcon, MEcSt,
Gerben Keijzers, MSc (Biomed Health Sci, Epi), MBBS, FACEM, PhD, Jeremy S. Furyk,
MBBS, MSc, MPH&TM, FACEM, Robert M. Eley, BSc(Hons), MSc, PhD, CBiol, CSci,
FRSB, Frances B. Kinnear, MBChB, BSc(Hons), PhD, FACEM, Ogilvie Thom, MBBS,
GCClinResMethods, FACEM, Ibrahim Mahmoud, MBBS, GCEpid, MSc, MPH, PhD,
and Anthony F. T. Brown, MBChB, FRCP, FRCSEd, FRCEM, FACEM

ABSTRACT
Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe demographic and clinical characteristics including
features that were consistent with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), use of diagnostic tests, emergency
department (ED) discharge diagnoses, and disposition of adult patients presenting with an acute headache to
EDs statewide across Queensland, Australia. In addition, potential variations in the presentation and diagnostic
workup between principal-referral and city-regional hospitals were examined.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted over 4 weeks in September 2014. All patients 18
years presenting to one of 29 public and ve private hospital EDs across the state with an acute headache were
included. The headache had to be the principal presenting complaint and nontraumatic. The 34 study sites attend to
about 90% of all ED presentations statewide. The treating doctor collected clinical information at the time of the ED
visit including the characteristics of the headache and investigations performed. A study coordinator retrieved
results of investigations, ED discharge diagnoses, and disposition from state databases. Variations in presentation,
investigations, and diagnosis between city-regional and principal-referral hospitals were examined.

Results: There were 847 headache presentations. Median (range) age was 39 (1892) years, 62% were female,
and 31% arrived by ambulance. Headache peaked instantly in 18% and 1 hour in 44%. It was worst ever in
37%, 10/10 in severity in 23%, and associated with physical activity in 7.4%. Glasgow Coma Scale score
was < 15 in 4.1%. Neck stiffness was noted on examination in 4.8%. Neurologic decit persisting in the ED was
found in 6.5%. A computed tomography (CT) head scan was performed in 38% (318/841, 95% CI = 35% to
41%) and an lumbar puncture in 4.7% (39/832, 95% CI = 3.4% to 6.3%). There were 18 SAH, six
intraparenchymal hemorrhages, one subdural hematoma, one newly diagnosed brain metastasis, and two
bacterial meningitis. Migraine was diagnosed in 23% and primary headache not further specied in 45%. CT
head scans were more likely to be performed in principal-referral hospitals (41%) compared to city-regional

From the School of Medicine, University of Queensland (KHC, RME, FBK, OT, IM, AFTB), Herston, Queensland; the Department of Emergency
Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Womens Hospital (KHC, THE, IM, AFTB), Herston, Queensland; the School of Medicine, Grifth University (GK),
Nathan, Queensland; the School of Medicine, Bond University (GK), Gold Coast, Queensland; the Department of Emergency Medicine, Gold Coast
University Hospital (GK), Gold Coast, Queensland; the College of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University (JSF), Townsville, Queensland;
the Department of Emergency Medicine, The Townsville Hospital (JSF), Townsville, Queensland; the Department of Emergency Medicine, Princess
Alexandra Hospital (RME), Brisbane, Queensland; the Department of Emergency Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital (FBK), Brisbane, Queens-
land; and the Department of Emergency Medicine, Nambour General Hospital (OT), Nambour, Queensland, Australia.
Received February 25, 2016; revision received July 24, 2016; accepted July 25, 2016.
Presented at the 32nd Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Annual Scientic Meeting, Brisbane, November 2015.
Funded by the Emergency Medicine Research Foundation (http://emergencyfoundation.org.au)
The authors have no relevant nancial information or potential conicts to disclose.
Supervising Editor: James E. Olson, PhD.
Address for correspondence and reprints: A/Prof Kevin Chu; e-mail: k.chu@uq.edu.au.
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2017;24:5362.

2016 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine ISSN 1069-6563


doi: 10.1111/acem.13062 PII ISSN 1069-6563583 53
54 Chu et al. ED HEADACHE PRESENTATIONS

hospitals (33%). The headache in patients presenting to the latter was less likely to be instantly peaking or
associated with activity, but was no less severe in intensity and was more frequently accompanied by nausea
and vomiting. Their diagnosis was more likely to be a benign primary headache. Variations in CT scanning could
thus be due to differences in the case mix. The median (interquartile range) ED length of stay was 3.1 (2.2 to 4.5)
hours. Patients was discharged from the ED or admitted to the ED short-stay unit prior to discharge in 57 and
23% of cases, respectively.

Conclusions: The majority of patients had a benign diagnosis, with intracranial hemorrhage and bacterial
meningitis accounting for only 3% of the diagnoses. There are variations in the proportion of patients receiving
CT head scans between city-regional and principal-referral hospitals. As 38% of headache presentations overall
underwent CT scanning, there is scope to rationalize diagnostic testing to rule out life-threatening conditions.

A cute headache as a presenting complaint is fre-


quently encountered by emergency physicians.1
Emergency departments (EDs) backed up by imaging
variations in the presentation and diagnostic workup
between principal-referral and city-regional hospitals
were examined.
and laboratory resources are well suited to perform the
diagnostic workup of worrisome headaches,2 but diag-
METHODS
nostic protocols and practice vary, and little is known
about which tests are done, or when. Hemorrhage,
Study Design
infection, and tumor are the most important serious
differential diagnoses that need to be considered and A cross-sectional study was undertaken to collect
potentially ruled out. This exclusion of life-threatening prospective clinical findings on consecutive adult
causes is complicated by the knowledge that the major- patients with a headache presenting to one of 29 pub-
ity of headaches are benign and do not require investi- lic and five private hospital EDs across the state. We
gations. Clinical decisions rules such as the Ottawa estimated that the study sites attend to about 90% of
subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) rule can assist in dis- all adult public and private ED presentations state-
criminating between these conditions and guide the wide. This estimation was based on data from the
need for investigations.3 national Nonadmitted Patient ED Care Database
Despite published rules and guidelines,4,5 there are (NPEDCD),10 which captures 95% of all state public
variations in the perceived need for specific investiga- ED attendances. The noncaptured 5% of public ED
tions between individual emergency physicians and attendances are presentations to the small public EDs
between departments.6,7 Differences in practice could scattered throughout the state. Furthermore, NPEDCD
be partially explained by the variety of different diag- does not capture attendances from private hospital
nostic approaches in the literature especially for sus- EDs. However, private hospitals attend to only about
pected SAH.8,9 Additionally, the benign nature of the 6% of all ED presentations in Australia.
vast majority of headaches limits rigorous comparisons The study was conducted over a 4-week period in
of alternative diagnostic workups for infrequent life- September 2014. The study was designed by the
threatening causes due to the large sample sizes Queensland Emergency Research Collaborative
required. (QERC)11 with support from site investigators at each
Perceptions about diagnostic approaches reported in participating ED. Individual hospital participation was
surveys may differ from actual practice. A snapshot or voluntary. The conduct was managed by a central
cross-sectional study can provide evidence for actual study coordinator. The states central human research
practice, give point prevalence estimations, and reveal ethics committee approved the study.
variations in practice. Knowledge of current practices
could inform efforts to establish a consistent evidence- Study Setting and Population
based diagnostic approach. Queensland is one of eight states and territories in
The objective of this study was to describe demo- Australia. It has a land area of approximately 1.7 mil-
graphic and clinical characteristics including features lion square kilometers and a residential population of
that were consistent with SAH, use of diagnostic 4.7 million in 2014 with 2.3 million residing in the
tests, and ED discharge diagnoses of adult patients southeast corner of the state.12 The 34 participating
presenting with an acute headache to EDs statewide hospitals are listed in Data Supplement S1 (available
across Queensland, Australia. In addition, potential as supporting information in the online version of this
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE January 2017, Vol. 24, No. 1 www.aemj.org 55

paper). For the purpose of this study, four hospitals view patient information including emergency presen-
with onsite neurosurgical services were categorized as tations and laboratory and imaging results across all
principal-referral hospitals. For the remaining hospi- state public hospitals. Data from private hospitals were
tals, 25 were categorized as city-regional hospitals and provided by site investigators in individual hospitals
five as private hospitals. based on their medical record, pathology, and radiol-
Patients were eligible for inclusion if they presented ogy systems. Primary outcomes were patient epidemiol-
to an ED with a nontraumatic headache of any poten- ogy, clinical features, investigations (CT and CSF
tial cause. The headache had to be the principal pre- analysis), and ED discharge diagnosis.
senting complaint. Some patients had multiple
presentations for a given headache episode. Moreover, Data Analysis
some patients had multiple headache episodes defined The 4-week study period and sample size were primar-
as being separated by a headache-free period. ily determined by resource constraints and practicali-
Patients < 18 years old were excluded. Interhospital ties of sustaining prospective data collection
transfers were identified and the patients journey simultaneously across 34 EDs. In 20122013, there
through the state healthcare system tracked using per- were a total of approximately 3,500 presentations per
sonal identifiers. day to Queensland public hospital EDs reporting to
NPEDCD.13 Conservatively estimating that 1% of ED
Study Protocol and Measures presentations were for headaches (half that reported by
The treating doctor prospectively completed the first Goldstein et al.1) a 28-day snapshot had the potential
one-page paper datasheet at the time of the ED visit. to capture approximately 1,000 cases. A sample size
He/she was specifically asked whether the headache calculation was not formally made.
was the principle presenting complaint. This was deter- The headaches were characterized with descriptive
mined at his/her discretion. The data variables included statistics calculated for patient demographic, clinical
the characteristics of the headache such as time from findings, investigations, and ED diagnosis. In an
onset to peak severity, pain severity at peak, whether exploratory analysis, city-regional hospitals were com-
the headache was considered worst ever by the patient pared with principal-referral hospitals using the chi-
or as thunderclap by the treating doctor, activity at square test, Fishers exact test, Student t-test, or Wil-
onset, past history of any headaches, and whether the coxon rank-sum test as appropriate. Statistical signifi-
current episode differed from that in the past. Other cance was set at a < 0.05 (two-sided). As analyses
symptoms and signs included Glasgow Coma Scale were considered exploratory, no formal adjustment for
score, loss of consciousness, neck pain and stiffness, multiple comparisons was performed. In another
and focal neurologic deficits. exploratory analysis, clinical risk factors associated with
The study coordinator completed the second one- intracranial hemorrhage or bacterial meningitis were
page datasheet upon the receipt of the first datasheet. quantified using unadjusted odd ratios (ORs) with
The second datasheet focused on the results of investi- 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk factors
gations including computed tomography (CT) head selected were based on prior research by Perry
scans and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis when et al.3,14 The association was further explored using a
sampled, ED length of stay and disposition, and ED multivariate logistic regression analysis.
diagnosis (based on an ED subset of the International Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 14.1
Classification of Disease 10 codes) recorded at the (StataCorp) except the multivariate logistic regression,
time of discharge. The CT and angiography results which was performed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS, Inc.).
abstracted were those reported by a consultant general Reporting followed the Strengthening the Reporting of
radiologist. Final diagnoses were checked at least 3 Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)
months post-ED presentation to ensure that serious Statement for cross-sectional studies.
causes of headaches such as intracranial hemorrhage
and meningitis were not missed at the initial presenta-
RESULTS
tion.
The information for the second datasheet was Over the 4-week period, 950 presentations were
sourced using a statewide ED-based desktop software recorded for 860 patients. The analysis excluded 13
application (The Viewer) designed for clinicians to presentations where headache was not the principal
56 Chu et al. ED HEADACHE PRESENTATIONS

complaint as recorded by the treating doctor, four pre- patients considered to have a thunderclap headache,
sentations where data on whether the headache was 94 (75.2%, 95% CI = 67.0% to 81.9%) was instantly
the principal complaint were missing, and 86 presenta- peaking. Principal-referral hospitals had a greater per-
tions which were not the first presentation of the first centage of patients with instantly peaking headache or
headache episode during the study period. This left considered as thunderclap by the treating doctor.
847 presentations from 847 patients available for anal- Other symptoms and signs are given in Table 3. City-
ysis (see Data Supplement S2, available as supporting regional hospitals also had a greater percentage of
information in the online version of this paper). Miss- patients complaining of nausea. Investigations per-
ing data are reflected in the denominators of the pro- formed are listed in Table 4. A CT head scan was per-
portions calculated for Tables 15. Data were missing, formed in 38% (318/841, 95% CI = 3541%) of all
for example, on headache onset to peak intensity in cases. The proportion was higher in principal-referral
11% (94/847), severity at peak in 13% (114/847), compared to city-regional hospitals (42% vs. 33%;
loss of consciousness in 3% (25/847), and CT head respectively; difference = 9%, 95% CI = 216%). CT
scans in 0.7% (6/847). scan by clinical variables is given in Data Supplement
In these 847 headache presentations, 424 (50.1%) S3 (available as supporting information in the online
presented to the 25 city-regional hospitals, 388 version of this paper). Lumbar puncture was per-
(45.8%) to the four principal-referral hospitals, and 35 formed in 4.7% (39/832, 95% CI = 3.4% to 6.3%).
(4.1%) to the five private hospitals. Patient demograph- ED discharge diagnosis, disposition, and ED length
ics, arrival by ambulance, time of presentation, triage of stay are given in Table 5. A headache diagnosis was
category, and previous diagnoses are given in Table 1. not specified in 44% (366/827, 95% CI = 41% to
Principal-referral hospitals had a greater percentage of 48%) of cases. There were 18 patients with SAH (13
males, patient arrivals by ambulance, and patients aneurysmal, five nonaneurysmal), six with intra-
triaged to higher urgency categories. parenchymal hemorrhage, three brain tumors (one
Characteristics of the headaches including those known primary brain tumor, one known brain metas-
consistent with the possibility of a SAH are given in tasis, one newly diagnosed metastasis), and two with
Table 2. In the 135 patients with instantly peaking bacterial meningitis. Intracranial hemorrhage and bac-
headaches, 94 (69.6%, 95% CI = 61.4% to 76.8%) terial meningitis accounted for 3.1% (95% CI = 2.2%
were considered as thunderclap by the treating doctor to 4.6%) of all the headache presentations. Patients
when specifically asked. Conversely, in the 125 were discharged home from the ED or admitted to the

Table 1
Patient Characteristics

All Hospitals,* City-regional Hospitals, Principal-referral Hospitals,


N = 847 (%) n = 424 (%) n = 388 (%) p-value
Age (y), median (range) 39 (1892) 39 (1888) 39 (1892) 0.360
Female 511/824 (62.0) 269/411 (65.5) 223/387 (57.7) 0.023
Arrival by ambulance 255/822 (31.0) 101/400 (25.3) 140/387 (36.2) 0.001
Time of presentation
00:0005:59 75/788 (9.5) 36/384 (9.4) 35/369 (9.5) 0.167
06:0011:59 221/788 (28.1) 120/384 (31.3) 91/369 (24.7)
12:0017:59 294/788 (37.3) 132/384 (34.4) 151/369 (40.9)
18:0023:59 198/788 (25.1) 96/384 (25.0) 92/369 (24.9)
Australasian Triage Scale score
1 9/821 (1.1) 2/408 (0.5) 7/387 1.8) 0.038
2 92/821 (11.2) 40/408 (9.8) 51/387 (13.2)
3 538/821 (63.5) 283/408 (69.4) 243/387 (62.8)
4 175/821 (21.3) 82/408 (20.1) 80/387 (20.7)
5 7/821 (0.9) 1/408 (0.3) 6/387 (1.6)
Previous diagnoses
Cerebral aneurysm 9/847 (1.1) 3/424 (0.7) 6/388 (1.6) 0.079
Subarachnoid hemorrhage 8/847 (0.9) 3/424 (0.7) 5/388 (1.3)
Brain tumor 13/847 (1.5) 3/424 (0.7) 10/388 (2.6)

*City-regional, principal-referral, and private hospitals.


Comparison between city-regional and principal-referral hospitals.
Ordinal scale ranging from 1 to 5 with 1 assigned to the most urgent cases.
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE January 2017, Vol. 24, No. 1 www.aemj.org 57

Table 2
Headache Clinical Characteristics on History

All Hospitals* City-regional Hospitals, Principal-referral


N = 847 (%) n = 424 (%) Hospitals, n = 388 (%) p-value
Time from onset to peak
Instantaneous 135/753 (17.9) 53/377 (14.1) 73/345 (21.2) 0.032
1 h (not instantaneous) 198/753 (26.3) 92/377 (24.4) 89/345 (25.8)
> 1 to 24 h 272/753 (36.1) 146/377 (38.7) 121/345 (35.1)
> 1 to 3 d 89/753 (11.8) 47/377 (12.5) 42/345 (12.2)
>3d 59/753 (7.8) 39/377 (10.3) 20/345 (5.8)
Severity at peak (110)
10 166/733 (22.7) 85/363 (23.4) 67/335 (20.0) 0.235
79 386/733 (52.7) 199/363 (54.8) 178/335 (53.1)
16 181/733 (24.7) 79/363 (21.8) 90/335 (26.9)
Worst headache ever 292/798 (36.6) 147/394 (37.3) 128/369 (34.7) 0.451
Thunderclap 125/832 (15.0) 51/418 (12.0) 65/379 (17.8) 0.048
Activity at onset (%)
Physical activity 53/838 (6.3) 25/420 (6.0) 26/383 (6.8) 0.615
Coitus 9/838 (1.1) 4//420 (1.0) 4/383 (1.0)
Daily activity 265/838 (31.6) 120/420 (28.6) 138/383 (36.0)
Resting 151/838 (18.0) 90/459 (21.4) 50/383 (13.1)
Sleeping 169/838 (20.2) 82/420 (19.5) 81/383 (21.2)
Others 191/838 (22.8) 99/420 (23.6) 84/383 (21.9)
Headache awoke patient from sleep 172/837 (20.6) 83/419 (19.8) 83/383 (21.7) 0.516
Able to walk after headache started 761/838 (90.8) 383/420 (91.2) 345/383 (90.1) 0.589
Past history of headaches 502/826 (60.8) 257/418 (61.5) 223/373 (59.8) 0.626
Current episode differs from past episodes 157/475 (33.1) 73/247 (29.6) 73/207 (35.3) 0.194

*City-regional, principal-referral, and private hospitals.


Comparison between city-regional and principal-referral hospitals.
Comparison after grouping activities as exertional (physical activity, coitus) and nonexertional (daily activity, resting, sleeping, others).

Table 3
Headache Clinical Features on Physical Examination

All Hospitals,* City-regional Hospitals, Principal-referral Hospitals,


N = 847 (%) n = 424 (%) n = 388 (%) p-value
Glasgow Coma Scale score
15 788/822 (95.9) 397/411 (96.6) 356/376 (94.7) 0.213
1314 16/822 (2.0) 9/411 (2.2) 7/376 (1.9)
1012 7/822 (0.9) 2/411 (0.5) 5/376 (1.3)
39 11/822 (1.3) 3/411 (0.7) 8/376 (2.1)
Temperature (C)
38 22/677 (3.3) 10/313 (3.2) 12/330 (3.7) 0.066
37 to <38 199/677 (29.4) 101/313 (32.3) 88/330 (26.7)
36 to <37 404/677 (59.7) 187/313 (59.7) 195/330 (59.1)
35 to <36 49/677 (7.2) 14/313 (4.5) 33/330 (10.0)
<35 3/677 (0.4) 1/313 (0.3) 2/330 (0.6)
Heart rate (beats/min), mean (SD) 79 (15) 78 (15) 79 (15) 0.325
Blood pressure (mm Hg), mean (SD)
Systolic 136 (24) 136 (23) 136 (24) 0.994
Diastolic 79 (14) 80 (14) 78 (15) 0.040
Loss of consciousness
Yes, witnessed 30/822 (3.7) 12/408 (2.9) 18/379 (4.8) 0.369
Yes, unwitnessed 19/822 (2.3) 11/408 (2.7) 8/379 (2.1)
Nausea 462/817 (56.6) 254/407 (62.4) 183/375 (48.8) <0.001
Vomiting 260/820 (31.7) 137/406 (33.7) 106/379 (28.0) 0.080
Neck pain or stiffness on history 185/815 (22.7) 88/405 (21.7) 87/375 (23.2) 0.623
Neck stiffness on examination 37/776 (4.8) 20/372 (5.4) 12/369 (3.3) 0.155
Neurologic decit
Yes, transient 109/818 (13.3) 63/404 (15.6) 46/379 (12.1) 0.094
Yes, persistent 53/818 (6.5) 21/404 (5.2) 32/379 (8.4)

*City-regional, principal-referral, and private hospitals.


Comparison between city-regional and principal-referral hospitals.

ED short-stay (observation) unit in 80% (654/813, Intracranial hemorrhage (SAH or intraparenchymal


95% CI = 78% to 83%) of the time. The median ED hemorrhage) and bacterial meningitis were associated
length of stay was 3.1 hours. with being older, being male, and arriving by
58 Chu et al. ED HEADACHE PRESENTATIONS

Table 4
Investigations Performed

All Hospitals,* City-regional Hospitals, Principal-referral Hospitals,


N = 847 (%) n = 424 (%) n = 388 (%) p-value
CT 318/841 (37.8) 139/420 (33.1) 162/386 (42.0) 0.009
Cerebral angiography 35/823 (4.3) 12/409 (2.9) 23/387 (5.9) 0.038
Lumbar puncture 39/832 (4.7) 24/420 (5.7) 13/377 (3.5) 0.129
CSF bilirubin analysis 13/832 (1.6) 12/420 (2.9) 1/377 (0.3) 0.004

*City-regional, principal-referral, and private hospitals.


Comparison between city-regional and principal-referral hospitals.
CSF = cerebrospinal uid.

Table 5
Diagnosis and Disposition

All Hospitals,* City-regional Hospitals, Principal-referral Hospitals,


N = 847 (%) n = 424 (%) n = 388 (%) p-value
Primary headache
Unknown cause 365/827 (44.1) 204/412 (49.5) 154/387 (39.8) <0.001
Migraine 194/827 (23.5) 106/412 (25.7) 80/387 (20.7)
Tension 57/827 (6.9) 30/412 (7.3) 25/387 (6.5)
Cluster 3/827 (0.4) 1/412 (0.2) 2/387 (0.5)
Secondary headache
Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid 18/827 (2.2) 9/412 (2.2) 9/387 (2.3)
Intra parenchymal 6/827 (0.7) 3/412 (0.7) 3/387 (0.8)
Subdural 1/827 (0.1) 0 1/387 (0.3)
Infection
Meningitisbacterial 2/827 (0.2) 0 1/387 (0.3)
Meningitiscryptococcal 1/827 (0.1) 1/412 (0.2) 0
Meningitisnegative CSF culture|| 4/827 (0.5) 3/412 (0.7) 1/387 (0.3)
Mastoiditis 1/827 (0.1) 0 0
Meningoencephalitis/encephalopathy 2/827 (0.2) 0 2/387 (0.5)
Neoplasm of brain 3/827 (0.4) 0 3/387 (0.8)
Infarction 17/827 (2.1) 5/412 (1.2) 12/387 (3.1)
Transient ischemic attack 15/827 (1.8) 3/412 (0.7) 12/387 (3.1)
Other headache diagnosis
Postlumbar puncture/epidural 4/827 (0.48) 2/412 (0.5) 2/387 (0.5)
Postcoital 1/827 (0.12) 0 0
Viral infection 25/827 (3.0) 6/412 (1.5) 18 /387 (4.7)
Respiratory causes 15/827 (1.8) 8 /412 (2.0) 4/387 (1.0)
Other nonhead-related causes 93/827 (11.3) 31/412 (7.5) 58/387 (15.0)
ED disposition
Discharged home 465/813 (57.2) 234/395 (59.2) 214/383 (55.9)
Did not wait (self-discharged) 14/813 (1.7) 11/395 (2.8) 3/383 (0.8)
Admitted
Short-stay unit (observation unit) 189/813 (23.3) 91/395 (23.0) 92/383 (24.0)
Internal medicine 99/813 (12.2) 39/395 (9.9) 52/383 (13.6)
Neurosurgery 13/813 (1.6) 0 11/383 (2.9)
Intensive care unit 13/813 (1.6) 1/395 (0.3) 10/383 (2.6)
Interhospital transfer 19/813 (2.4) 19/395 (4.8) 0
Died in ED 1/813 (0.12) 0 1/383 (0.3)
ED length-of-stay (h), median (IQR) 3.1 (2.24.5) 3.1 (2.14.4) 3.4 (2.34.7) 0.054

*City-regional, principal-referral, and private hospitals.


Comparison between city-regional and principal-referral hospitals. Diagnosis is categorized into ve groups: primary headache, sec-
ondary headache, other headache, viral infection, respiratory causes, and other nonhead related causes.
One Haemophilus inuenza on CSF culture, one Streptococcus pneumoniae on CSF polymerase chain reaction.
Immunosuppressed patient with known cryptococcal meningitis.
||Three viral meningitis, one Mollaret meningitis.
CSF = cerebrospinal uid; IQR = interquartile range.

ambulance. The headache was more likely to be associated with impaired consciousness, neck stiffness
instantly peaking, more severe, worst ever, different on examination, and persistent neurologic deficits. A
from past episodes, and related to exertion. It was also past history of any headache was more likely with
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE January 2017, Vol. 24, No. 1 www.aemj.org 59

benign primary headaches. The unadjusted ORs are specificity was 99.8% (95% CI = 98.8% to 99.9%),
given in Data Supplement S4 (available as supporting positive predictive value was 91.7% (95% CI = 61.5%
information in the online version of this paper). The to 99.8%), and negative predictive value was 99.4%
adjusted ORs from the multivariate logistic regression (95% CI = 98.1% to 99.9%).
analysis are given in the Table 6.
The Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients showed
DISCUSSION
that the multivariate logistic regression model was sta-
tistically significant (v2(16) = 102.208, p < 0.0001). Emergency physicians are familiar with red flag
The casewise plot was not produced because no out- symptoms and signs in the evaluation of patients pre-
liers were found and no multicollinearity detected senting with a headache, consistent with a potentially
(variance inflation factor < 3). The model explained serious underlying cause such as hemorrhage or infec-
82.9% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance in life-threaten- tion. Critical clinical features include, but are not lim-
ing headache and correctly classified 99.2% of cases. ited to, sudden onset, maximal at onset, and different
Sensitivity was 78.6% (95% CI = 49.2% to 95.3%), than previous headaches for SAH; fever and menin-
geal irritation for bacterial meningitis; and progres-
sively worse over time or worse in morning or head
Table 6
Multivariate Logistic Regression Model for Clinical Features Associ- down position for space-occupying lesion.15 The
ated With a Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage or Bacterial Meningitis majority of headaches are, however, benign but painful
exacerbations of chronic primary headaches such as
Adjusted OR (95% CI) p-value
migraine, tension-type, and cluster.16
Age (y)
>40 5476 (3.9769891) 0.020 In this study we prospectively characterized over
40 1.0 800 nontraumatic headache presentations in adult
Sex
Male 1234 (2.367264) 0.027 patients across 34 EDs. Acute life-threatening causes
Female 1.0 such as intracranial hemorrhage and bacterial meningi-
Arrival by ambulance
Yes 12 (0.3528) 0.197 tis accounted for about 3%. The majority of headaches
No 1.0
Time from onset to peak
were benign primary headaches. The assignment of a
Instantaneous 50 (1.51700) 0.029 specific diagnosis to these headaches was challenging.
1 h (not instantaneous) 1.2 (0.113.8) 0.895
>1 h 1.0 About 44% of the headache episodes in this study
Severity at peak were labeled as a headache, without a more specific
10 224 (0.95614) 0.055
79 17 (0.12132) 0.255 International Classification of Headache Disorder diag-
16 1.0 nosis.17 This is higher than the 36% reported by
Worst headache ever
Yes 0.1 (0.004.9) 0.239 Friedman et al.,18 who conducted detailed structured
No 1.0 patient interviews with the assistance of trained
Associated with physical activity or coitus
Yes 3614 (8.7150235) 0.008 research associates. Migraine, tension, and cluster
No 1.0
Past history of headache
headaches with their specific treatments represented
Yes 0.001 (0.000.18) 0.009 about 31% of cases in our study. The combined viral
No 1.0
Current episode differs from past episodes infections and respiratory causes comprised about 5%
Yes 1.6 (0.0644.3) 0.770 of cases.
No 1.0
Glasgow Coma Scale score In our setting, CT head scans were more likely to
15 1.0 0.256 be performed in principal-referral hospitals (42%)
1314 43 (0.0728067) 0.142
312 2472 (0.0784204036) compared to city-regional hospitals (33%). Patients pre-
Loss of consciousness
Yeswitness 81 (0.415004) 0.099
senting to the latter were more likely to be female, not
Yesunwitnessed 358 (0.04180) 0.830 arrive by ambulance, and be assigned a lower triage
No 1.0
Neck stiffness on examination category. Their headache was less likely to be instantly
Yes 79811 (24264269) 0.006 peaking or associated with activity, but was no less sev-
No 1.0
Neck pain or stiffness on history ere in intensity and was more frequently accompanied
Yes 0.08 (0.003.4) 0.188 by nausea and vomiting. Their diagnosis was more
No 1.0
Neurologic decit in ED likely to be a benign primary headache. The difference
Yes 2.7 (0.240) 0.481 likely reflects the case mix and clientele presenting to
No 1.0
community versus university hospitals. Variations in
60 Chu et al. ED HEADACHE PRESENTATIONS

CT scanning could thus be due to differences symp- the patients impaired consciousness precluded a
tomatology and diagnosis. description of the headache and circumstances sur-
Overall, the proportion of patients receiving CT rounding the presentation or because data were not
head scans in this snapshot was higher than antici- recorded by the treating doctor. Data were missing
pated. CT scans are ordered at a rate of 10.8 per 100 from the second datasheet when patients left the ED
headache problems in Australian general practice,19 before the assessment was completed, there was no
while neuroimaging was obtained in 12.4% of all identifier on the first datasheet to link patients to elec-
headache visits to outpatient office-based care in the tronic medical records, or patients placed a privacy
United States.20 Comparative figures for ED patients request on their electronic record so that it could be
are elusive but are expected to be higher than non ED accessed by the investigators.
patients. Lumbar punctures were slightly more likely Patients without neuroimaging and without repre-
to be performed at city-regional hospitals (5.9%) com- sentations for at least 3 months were assumed not to
pared to principal-referral hospitals (3.7%), possibility have had a change of their diagnosis. Representations
because CT scanning is less available after hours in and revisions in diagnosis, however, will not be cap-
the former, although the difference was not statistically tured in our local state databases if the patient repre-
significant. sented interstate.
Finally, the multivariate logistic regression analysis
remains exploratory. Peduzzi et al.21 suggested that
LIMITATIONS
the minimum number (N) of cases required for a
The strength of this study is its generalizability as it multivariate logistic regression analysis is 10k/p,
included almost all ED presentations in the state for a where k is the number of covariates and p is small-
period of 4 weeks. In addition, the final diagnosis was est of the proportions of negative or positive cases.
reviewed after at least 3 months to ensure that serious In this study, there were 847 cases with 3.1% caused
causes of headache were not missed. There are, how- by intracranial hemorrhage or bacterial meningitis.
ever, limitations that might threaten its internal validity The number of covariate (k) that would be supported
before external validity can be considered. Patient is 2.6 (847 = 10k/ 0.031). This study is thus under-
recruitment was based on the doctors assessment that powered to provide robustness and stability of the
the headache was a primary symptom. Eligibility was regression model. Furthermore, the model needs to
not verified nor were missing cases specifically sought. be cross-validated before any definitive conclusions
Systematic selection bias is possible but unlikely given can be made.
cases were enrolled in the ED 24 hours per day by
many clinicians across many sites.
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical data were collected by the treating doc-
tor and not by dedicated trained research personnel. In Queensland, acute headache is a common presenta-
Data quality was not assessed, for example, by examin- tion to the ED, with the majority of patients having a
ing agreement with a second data collector. The benign diagnosis, while intracranial hemorrhage and
prospectively collected clinical data in the preprinted bacterial meningitis account for only 3% of the diag-
datasheet were, however, usual information required noses. Computed tomography head scans are more
for the assessment of an ED headache presentation commonly performed at principal-referral hospitals
and as such represent real-world data. compared with city-regional hospitals likely as a result
Missing data in this prospective study were consid- of differences in the case mix. As 38% of headache
ered as missing and not assumed to be the absence of presentations overall underwent CT scanning, there is
a criterion. For the data collection, questions on clini- scope to rationalize diagnostic testing to rule out life-
cal history stipulated a yes or no response. The only threatening conditions.
exception was for past history of SAH, cerebral aneur- The following individuals in addition to the writing
ysm, or brain tumor, where there was a list of tick group contributed to the conduct of this study:
boxes for these conditions. Whether missing data may Anthony Bell, Queen Elizabeth II Hospital; Pauline
bias the results will depend on whether the data were Calleja, Barcaldine Hospital; Jaimi Greenslade, Royal
missing at random or not. The latter could be prob- Brisbane & Womens Hospital; Casey Kean Khoo,
lematic. Data were missing from the first datasheet if Hervey Bay Hospital; Jason Lindeman, Gympie
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE January 2017, Vol. 24, No. 1 www.aemj.org 61

Hospital; Stephen Margolis, Logan Hospital; Shane tomographic angiography in place of lumbar puncture?
Martin, Ipswich Base Hospital; Chris May, Redlands Acad Emerg Med 2010;17:9915.
Hospital; Doug Morel, Redcliffe Hospital; Vicki Mul- 10. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Non-
ler, Maryborough Hospital; Ulrich Orda, Mt Isa admitted Patient Emergency Department Care Database.
Available at: http://www.aihw.gov.au/hospitals-data/na
Hospital; Peter Pereira, Cairns Base Hospital; Liz Platz,
tional-non-admitted-patient-emergency-department-care.
Kingaroy Hospital; Donna Powell, Caloundra Hospi-
Accessed Aug 24, 2016.
tal, Louise Prowse, Capricorn Coast Hospital; David
11. Queensland Emergency Medicine Research Foundation.
Rosengren, Greenslopes Private Hospital; Sean Roth- QERC at QEMRF. Available at: http://emergencyfoun
well, St. Andrews War Memorial Hospital; Henk dation.org.au/research/research-support-network/.
Sigle, Rockhampton Base Hospital; Neale Thornton, Accessed Aug 24, 2016.
Mackay Base Hospital; Joseph Ting, Mater Adults 12. Queensland Government Statisticians Office. Queensland
Hospital; Greg Treston, Bundaberg Base Hospital; Regional Profiles, Available at: http://statistics.qgso.
Yusuke Ueno-Dewhirst, Nambour General Hospital; qld.gov.au/qld-regional-profiles. Accessed Aug 24, 2016.
Eric Van Puymbroeck, Noosa Private Hospital; and 13. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2013. Aus-
Ben Walters, John Flynn Private Hospital and Pin- tralian Hospital Statistics 201213: Emergency Depart-
darra Private Hospital. ment Care. Health Services Series No. 52. Cat. No. HSE
142. Canberra: AIHW, 2013.
14. Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Sivilotti ML, et al. High risk clinical
References characteristics for subarachnoid haemorrhage in patients
with acute headache: prospective cohort study. BMJ
1. Goldstein JN, Camargo CA Jr, Pelletier AJ, Edlow JA.
2010;341:c5204.
Headache in United States emergency departments: demo-
15. Swadron SP. Pitfalls in the management of headache in
graphics, work-up and frequency of pathological diagnoses.
the emergency department. Emerg Med Clin North Am
Cephalalgia 2006;26:68490.
2010;28:12747.
2. Friedman BW, Lipton RB. Headache in the emergency
16. Friedman BW, Grosberg BM. Diagnosis and management
department. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2011;15:3027.
of the primary headache disorders in the emergency
3. Perry JJ, Stiell IG, Sivilotti MA, et al. Clinical decision
department setting. Emerg Med Clin North Am
rules to rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage for acute head-
2009;27:7187.
ache. JAMA 2013;310:124855.
17. International Headache Society. HIS Classification ICHD-
4. Edlow JA, Panagos PD, Godwin SA, Thomas TL, Decker
II. Available at: http://ihs-classification.org/en. Accessed
WW. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and
Aug 24, 2016.
management of adult patients presenting to the emergency
18. Friedman BW, Hochberg ML, Esses D, et al. Applying
department with acute headache. Ann Emerg Med
the International Classification of Headache Disorders to
2008;52:40736.
the emergency department: an assessment of reproducibil-
5. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine. Guidelines
ity and the frequency with which a unique diagnosis can
on Diagnostic Imaging. Available at: https://acem.org.au/
be assigned to every acute headache presentation. Ann
getattachment/17ee11f1-bdaf-4ca4-a524-396690123ba7/Dia
Emerg Med 2007;49:40919.
gnostic-Imaging.aspx. Accessed Aug 24, 2016.
19. Charles J, Ng A, Britt H. Presentations of headache in
6. Rogers A, Furyk J, Banks C, Chu K. Diagnosis of sub-
Australian general practice. Austr Fam Physician
arachnoid haemorrhage: a survey of Australasian emer-
2005;34:6189.
gency physicians and trainees. Emerg Med Australas
20. Callaghan BC, Kerber KA, Pace RJ, Skolarus LE, Burke
2014;26:46873.
JF. Headaches and neuroimaging: high utilization and
7. Perry JJ, Eagles D, Clement CM, et al. An international
costs despite guidelines. JAMA 2014;174:81921.
study of emergency physicians practice for acute headache
21. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein
management and the need for a clinical decision rule.
AR. A simulation study of the number of events per vari-
CJEM 2009;11:51622.
able in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol
8. Chu KH, Bishop RO, Brown AF. Spectrophotometry, not
1996;49:13739.
visual inspection for the detection of xanthochromia in
suspected subarachnoid haemorrhage: a debate. Emerg
Med Australas 2015;27:26772. Supporting Information
9. Edlow JA. What are the unintended consequences of
changing the diagnostic paradigm for subarachnoid hemor- The following supporting information is available in
rhage after brain computed tomography to computed the online version of this paper:
62 Chu et al. ED HEADACHE PRESENTATIONS

Data Supplement S1. Participating hospitals. Data Supplement S4. Clinical features associated
Data Supplement S2. Number of patient presenta- with a risk of intracranial hemorrhage or bacterial
tions. meningitis.
Data Supplement S3. CT head scan rate by hospi-
tal category for selected clinical characteristics.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi