Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Levels
Score
Is well thought out and supports the Few (1 to 3) spelling, grammatical, or Information supports the solution to the Multimedia is used to illustrate the main
solution punctuation errors challenge or question points
Has application of critical thinking that is Good use of vocabulary and word Format is appropriate for the content
apparent choice
3 Presentation captures audience attention
Has clear goal that is related to the topic
Presentation is well organized
Is pulled from several sources
All group members present
Is accurate
Supports the solution Minimal (3 to 5) spelling, grammatical, Project has a focus but might stray from it Multimedia loosely illustrates the main
or punctuation errors at times points
Has application of critical thinking that is
apparent Low-level use of vocabulary and word Information appears to have a pattern, but Format does not suit the content
choice the pattern is not consistently carried out
Has no clear goal Presentation does not capture audience
2 in the project
attention
Is pulled from a limited number of
Information loosely supports the solution
sources Presentation is loosely organized
Has some factual errors or Only some group members present
inconsistencies
Provides inconsistent information for More than 5 spelling, grammatical, or Content is unfocused and haphazard Presentation appears sloppy and/or
solution punctuation errors unfinished
Information does not support the solution
Has no apparent application of critical Poor use of vocabulary and word to the challenge or question Multimedia is overused or underused
thinking choice
Information has no apparent pattern Format does not enhance content
1
Has no clear goal
Presentation has no clear organization
Is pulled from few sources
Only one group member presents
Has significant factual errors,
misconceptions, or misinterpretations