Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 3

Dialogue is the best way to combat terrorism.

Outline

1. Introduction.

1.1. The lesson that the history teaches us is that dialogue is the best way
to combat terrorism.

1.2. Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate
2. Body.

2.1. Terrorism is a menace for any state or country in both social and
economic spheres.

2.2. The available options to combat terrorism.

2.2.1. A full fledge military option: can kill the terrorists but not their
ideology.

2.2.2. Surrender: an option that no state can afford at any situation.

2.2.3. Dialogue: A drop of honey catches more flies than a


hogshead of vinegar.
2.3. Reasons why dialogue is the best way to combat terrorism.
2.3.1. Dialogue is the permanent solution to combat terrorism.
2.3.2. Dialogue achieves result with no loss of human lives and
infrastructure damage at all.
2.3.3. Dialogue is backed by the populace of the state.
2.3.4. Dialogue shows the seriousness of the state's authority to
completely eradicate terrorism.
2.3.5. Dialogue leaves no room for the false propaganda of the
terrorists.
2.4. The positive impacts of using dialogue to combat terrorism.
2.4.1. Dialogue results in the peace: the most essential element for
any state's success.
2.4.2. The nation is put to the path towards prosperity.
2.4.3. Harmony prevails within the state: reuniting all of the
population.
2.4.4. The socio-economic factors affected by terrorism resume
their duty to contribute towards the progress of the
state.

2.5. Comparison of the states that have used dialogue to combat the
terrorism with the states that have used the milatary option for
terrorism.

2.5.1. Ireland vs. Afghanistan.

2.5.2. Fall of East Pakistan vs. reunification of Germany.

2.6. Pragmatic suggestions that would strengthen the positive results of


dialogue to combat terrorism.

2.6.1. Role of media.

2.6.2. Role of strong political will.

2.6.3. Role of social institutions.

2.6.4. Role of general public.

2.6.5. Role of the regional and international organisations.

2.6.6. Non interference of the vested interest groups.

3. Conclusion.

3.1. Critical analysis: terrorism can only be best defeated with the recipe of
dialogue.

3.2. Wars kill the enemies but dialogue ends the terrorism for good.

Terrorism has always been haintung the world in one way or the other.
One time it loomed larged in the conflict of the Protestants with the Catholics. In
another chapter of the history, the Cold War era incited terrorist activities
affecting the whole world. The list consists infinite instances of terrorism e.g. the
Tamil Tigers, the North Ireland terrorism, the Islamic extremists etc. They all had
different condemnable motives. Every time they were tried to be crushed by
force, the reappeared stronger than before. Consequently, the need for bringing
the terrorists to the negotiating table was felt necessary. To simply put, dialogue
has always been used to curb terroism.

Force is all conquering, but it's victories are short lived.


-Abraham Lincoln.

Undoubtedly, dialogue is the best way to combat terroism. There is no


divided opinion on the fact that terrosim is a menace for any country. It causes
nothing but disasters, in both human and economic losses, for the respective
country. In order to eradicate terrorism, three options are available. First is of a
military action. History is the epitome that it always results in a negative way by
showing the terroists as being the innocent and the oppressed. Second solution
is of surrender that no country can affird to choose. The last option is of dialogue.
This option not only ends the terrorism once and for all but also there is no
humand and economic loss. Along with this, it is heavily supported by the
populace. It also shows the seriousness of the government. Consequently,
hampering the false propaganda of the terrorists by which they recruit the
innocent public. It causes both immediate and long lasting impacts for that state.
The peace prevails and the envoronment of fear is removed. It restarts the
economic machinery. Besides this, the whole public is being reunited. All in all,
leading the state towards the path of prosperity. Hemce, a once failing state
starts to firm its feet for progress. with the help of pragmatic steps dialogue can
cause a very positive role. With the joint efforsts of the governement, society,
media etc., dialogue can eliminate terrorism. It can only succed with the sincere
efforsts from all ends.

"Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate."
-JOHN F. KENNEDY

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi