0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
14 vues12 pages
Youth of today are supposed to belong either to the self-centered generation Y. The eGeneration has developed a fantastic ability to sort information and accomplish several tasks at the same time. Young citizens pay attention to no more than approximately 10 percent of all online advertisement.
Youth of today are supposed to belong either to the self-centered generation Y. The eGeneration has developed a fantastic ability to sort information and accomplish several tasks at the same time. Young citizens pay attention to no more than approximately 10 percent of all online advertisement.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Youth of today are supposed to belong either to the self-centered generation Y. The eGeneration has developed a fantastic ability to sort information and accomplish several tasks at the same time. Young citizens pay attention to no more than approximately 10 percent of all online advertisement.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 1 Introduction A great amount of research describes how young citizens are abandoning traditional democratic institutions. Fewer people join political parties and fewer people vote in general elections.
This has led to a discussion on whether
traditional representative forms of democratic governance are out of date. If so, through which types of actions is a modern citizenship defined? Is it true that the youth of today has a limited interest in politics and democracy?
The youth of today are supposed to belong either
to the self-centered and lazy generation Y – only caring about themselves, or the digital natives of generation Z, rather speaking through MSN than face to face. Is this picture correct?
eRevolution 18 - 20 November 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 2 Digital natives and Internet habits Josefin is a member of 10 groups: for example Amnesty, Doctors without borders and against violence. This young person takes a stand in a variety of issues – and not all but many are very important. We can hardly blame her for not caring, can we? Josefin’s generation – the eGeneration - has developed a fantastic ability to sort information and accomplish several tasks at the same time – this is clearly an adaptation to the information- and knowledge society. Research has shown that the youth has formed a great capacity to skim read and to take out only the bits and pieces they are interested in. For example the young citizens pay attention to no more than approximately 10 percent of all online advertisement. The information society has brought new ways of collecting and sorting information, which also influences young peoples’ ways of taking active interest in the issues concerning them.
eRevolution 18 - 20 November 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 3 Our survey To get a youth perspective, PricewaterhouseCoopers put 19 questions through a web survey.
Our most important way to distribute the survey
was to use Sweden’s major social forum for students, called Mimers Brunn. It assembles students mainly at the age of 14-25.
The number of people responding the various
questions varied between 700 and 1600.
eRevolution 18 - 20 November 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 4 Delimitation To get a youth perspective on citizen commitment and eGovernment we have based our survey on three aspects; • eParticipation, • eInformation and • eServices.
Information and services online are self evident
for young citizens.
Even though there is a lot unrealized potential in
eInformation and eServices, our survey shows that participation is the greatest challenge. It is therefore our main focus in this presentation.
eRevolution 18 - 20 November 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 5 Societal information So where do young people – the so-called copy paste generation - tend to find the societal information they look for? When Josephine sets out to find information about a political issue, she does not start by going to library, looking it up in a reference book, or call a friend. She starts by posing a question in a search engine, such as Google, which leads her in to Wikipedia and then to an authority’s homepage. Of the respondents in our survey, four out of five use Google or other search engines. It is the most common way to find societal information. It is important to notice that they don’t start by navigating directly to certain homepages. Our survey suggests that youth don’t find it important to have overall knowledge regarding the public authorities and institutions. Instead they simply phrase a question about their very specific field of interest. For a young person, pages of interest would be those that answer the question in the most essential and fast manner. There is a common belief that young people search for information within the social forums they attend. Our survey could not confirm this. We believe that young people in general go to authorities’ home-pages in order to get what they think are straight reliable facts on the issues of eRevolution their interest. 18 - 20 November 2009 PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 6 Expression and impact Our survey results tell us that the most common way to express an opinion is through “new social medias”. Most frequent is to join an online group, for example on Facebook followed by to comment on blogs and articles online.
However, it is somewhat a paradox that the young
respondents believe the effect of these actions, the most common actions, is small, in comparison to traditional ways of taking action, such as demonstrating in the streets.
The respondents consider that the most effective
way to have impact is by using traditional forums where meeting decision makers in person is best followed by contacting mass media.
eRevolution 18 - 20 November 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 7 Quick fix So why do young people choose these ways to express commitment, even though they expect the impact to be limited? The survey shows that it enables one to kill two birds with one stone. First, expressing your opinion in social media is a way of defining yourself to others, secondly it is time efficient. And limited impact is not the same as no impact at all.
eRevolution 18 - 20 November 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 8 Decision making…. The respondents of our survey consider traditional institutions, in particular politicians and journalists, to have a great impact on society while ‘Citizens’ are thought to have limited impact. Even though almost 1/10 considers blogs to have a medium or great impact, the majority considers bloggers to have a small impact on society.
Thus, the young generation still believes in
traditional institutions more than new social medias when it comes to influence.
eRevolution 18 - 20 November 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 9 ….. and social forums But how does the young generation want to communicate with decision makers? Some people think that the youth expects decision makers to chat and communicate at the forums where the young people are.
The PwC survey, including a recent work shop
that we arranged with students, suggests that the young generation is reluctant to communicate with the decision makers in their own social forums. Some student’s are not even reluctant, they simply said: authorities - stay out!
How many of you are friends with your mother on
Face book?? Well, have that in mind when you are trying out new forums to involve young citizens.
eRevolution 18 - 20 November 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 10 Summary Internet has brought new ways of collecting and sorting information. And this also influences young peoples’ ways of taking active interest in the issues of their concern.
Our survey suggests that youth do not find it
important to have overall knowledge regarding the public authorities and institutions. Their behavior is characterized by one issue at a time. New social media provides new opportunities to mobilize young citizens – sometimes leading them on to a deeper involvement, through traditional institutions. One interesting example is the Swedish Pirate party, starting out as an online movement, ending up today being represented in the EU parliament.
We perceive that young people are reluctant to
have decision makers within their online social forums. Privacy is surely one reason for this; • they want to have their private sphere, • they want to be able to know that the sender and the information is reliable and • they want to keep a sense of exclusivity to their network.
eRevolution 18 - 20 November 2009
PricewaterhouseCoopers Slide 11 Closing statements The eGeneration does care about others than themselves. And they still appreciate talking face to face. They also recognize traditional democratic institutions. It is just that they are engaged in new ways. And they approach the institutions in new ways. But, we see a gap between how young people want to interact with decision makers, on one hand, and their conception of given opportunities to have an impact, on the other hand. The involvement and engagement of the young generation is essential in a sustainable society. Moreover demographics shows how dependent we are of their contribution to secure the provision and financing of the public sector. The current focus on eServices is not enough. Online services and information are self evident for the eGeneration. There is a need of new strategies that recognizes that citizens, including youth, are not customers primarily but sources of knowledge, engagement and responsibility that are needed in a co-creating process that challenge the current decision making process and addresses the future.