Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Revised 2015
Learning Objectives
INTRODUCTION
Explain the importance of Artificial Lift for world oil
production.
List the different types of Artificial Lift .
SELECTION
Select appropriate type Artificial Lift based on ranking
criteria
Revised 2015
Learning Objectives
Rod (Beam) Pump
Describe the concept and component parts of a Beam
Pump.
Select well conditions suitable for beam pump installation.
Electric Submersible Pump (ESP)
Identify the components of an Electric Submersible Pump.
Describe the preferred applications and the mode of
operation of the (ESP).
Gas Lift
Describe the gas lift process
Identify application areas/advantages for gas lift
Revised 2015
Recovery mechanisms
Revised 2015
Need for artificial lift
Artificial lift is required when well:
will no longer flow
production rate is low to be economic
Revised 2015
Need for artificial lift
Is it possible for this well to flow
naturally under any conditions?
Well TVD=15000 ft
Revised 2015
The need for Artificial Lift 7% of wells
produce under
natural flow
(1994)
However, the well
This well must first be kicked
off by swabbing.
is unable to
initiate
flow
Revised 2015
Well Start-up: Swabbing
Revised 2015
Pump Classification
Revised 2015
Artificial Lift Application
Selected type
of Artificial Lift
varies according
to particular
conditions of the
oilfield being
USA 1992
produced
Revised 2015
Integration of Artificial Lift into Field
Development
Tools for Thinking in Systems are now available (1995):
reservoir / well / production system models
Revised 2015
Artificial Lift Selection Criteria
Revised 2015
Well Characteristics
Production casing size & Oil Production Rate required
Maximum Size of tubing - required gross production rate
Annular / tubing safety systems
Depth
Deviation & doglegs - planned & unplanned
Nature of Produced fluids
Oil Viscosity & Gas - liquid ratio
Water cut (gross production rate & Emulsion formation)
Sand / Wax / Asphaltene deposition
Well Inflow characteristics
Some of the following discussion is after material from Lea and
Patterson[1] and Lea and Nickens[2].
Revised 2015
Reservoir Characteristics
Artificial lift considerations should ideally be part of the well planning process. Future lift requirements
will be based on the overall reservoir exploitation strategy, and will have a strong impact on the well
design.
Some of the key factors that influence the selection of an artificial lift method.
Liquid production rate: The anticipated production rate is a controlling factor in selecting a lift method;
positive displacement pumps are generally limited to rates of 4000-6000 B/D.
Water cut: High water cuts require a lift method that can move large volumes of fluid
Revised 2015
Reservoir Characteristics
Gas-liquid ratio: A high GLR generally lowers the efficiency of pump-assisted lift
Viscosity: Viscosities less than 10 cp are generally not a factor in selecting a lift method; high-viscosity
fluids can cause difficulty, particularly in sucker rod pumping
Formation volume factor: Ratio of reservoir volume to surface volume determines how much total fluid
must be lifted to achieve the desired surface production rate
Reservoir drive mechanism: Depletion drive reservoirs: Late-stage production may require pumping to
produce low fluid volumes or injected water.
Water drive reservoirs : High water cuts may cause problems for lifting systems
Gas cap drive reservoirs : Increasing gas-liquid ratios may affect lift efficiency.
Revised 2015
Well Inflow Characteristics
Completion type: Completion and perforation skin factors affect inflow performance.
Casing and tubing sizes: Small-diameter casing limits the production tubing size and constrains multiple
options. Small-diameter tubing will limit production rates, but larger tubing may allow excessive fluid
fallback.
Wellbore deviation: Highly deviated wells may limit applications of beam pumping or PCP systems
because of drag, compressive forces and potential for rod and tubing wear.
Revised 2015
Revised 2015
Surface Characteristics
Flow rates: Flow rates are governed by wellhead pressures and backpressures in surface production
equipment (i.e., separators, chokes and flowlines).
Power sources: The availability of electricity or natural gas governs the type of artificial lift selected.
Diesel, propane or other sources may also be considered.
Field location: In offshore fields, the availability of platform space and placement of directional wells are
primary considerations. In onshore fields, such factors as noise limits, safety, environmental, pollution
concerns, surface access and well spacing must be considered.
Revised 2015
Field Location
Onshore
Urban / Farming / National Park / isolated
Desert / Jungle / Mountainous / Arctic
Offshore
platform size & facilities
distance to processing facilities
Isolated Well or Close Spacing
Power source for prime mover
natural gas /mains electricity /diesel powered
electricity generating set
Revised 2015
Operational Problems
Sand / formation fines production
Solid deposition: Remove or Inhibit depositsby
chemical injection formation
Paraffin (Temperature reduction)
Asphaltenes (Pressure reduction)
(Inorganic) Scale (CaCO3, BaSO4, NaCl etc.)
Hydrates (low temperatures)
Construction Materials
Bottom Hole Temperature
Corrosive conditions (e.g. H2S, CO2 )
extent of solids production
producing velocities (erosion)
Revised 2015
Field Operating Characteristics
Long-range recovery plans: Field conditions may change over time.
Pressure maintenance operations: Water or gas injection may change the artificial lift requirements
for a field.
Enhanced oil recovery projects: EOR processes may change fluid properties and require changes in
the artificial lift system.
Field automation: If the surface control equipment will be electrically powered, an electrically
powered artificial lift system should be considered.
Availability of operating and service personnel and support services: Some artificial lift systems
are relatively low-maintenance; others require regular monitoring and adjustment. Servicing
requirements (e.g., workover rig versus wireline unit) should be considered. Familiarity of field
personnel with equipment should also be taken into account.
Revised 2015
General Guidelines (Weatherford 2005)
Revised 2015
General Guidelines (Weatherford 2005)
Revised 2015
General Guidelines (Weatherford 2005)
Revised 2015
Economics
Initial CAPEX
Centralised Facilities?
Operating Costs
Equipment Life
Energy efficiency
Run lifetime
downhole
monitoring
training
Revised 2015
Relative Advantages of Artificial Lift
Methods
Revised 2015
Relative Disadvantages of Artificial Lift
Methods
Revised 2015
Artificial Lift:
Rod Pumps
Revised 2015
AD&DISAD.
Revised 2015
Sucker Rod or Beam Pump
Revised 2015
Sucker Rod Pump
Pump is driven by the surface unit
Pump and surface unit connected by sucker rods
The downhole pump does the actual pumping and
lifting of the produced liquid.
The pumping capacity is controlled by the:
Pumping speed,
Stroke length,
Pump type
Pump Diameter and
Pump efficiency.
Revised 2015
The Sucker Rods
Revised 2015
Tubing Pump
The Tubing Pump is
installed at the bottom of
the production tubing
Plunger moves against
polished Pump Barrel of
same diameter as the tubing
Larger pump rate than insert
pump
BUT Tubing has to be
recovered to repair pump
Revised 2015
How a Downhole
Pump Works
Hollow plunger seals against
pump barrel
Traveling & Standing valves
consist of Ball & Seat in a cage
Fluid moves from casing to
tubing by UP & DOWN motion
of plunger & valve operation
Travelling Valve Open &
Standing Valve Closed during
downward rod movement
Revised 2015
The Downhole Pump
Valve operation is reversed when
rod begins to move upwards
Travelling Valve Closed &
Standing Valve Open during
UPWARD rod movement
UPWARD movement of plunger:
Lifts fluid above plunger to
surface
Reduces the pressure in the
barrel (drawdown).
Sucks fluid from perforations
into the barrel
Revised 2015
The Downhole Pump
Revised 2015
The Downhole Pump
Revised 2015
Rod Pump equipped with Pump-Off Control
powered by Solar Energy
Revised 2015
Sonolog or Echometer Fluid Level Survey
Measurement of
fluid level in annulus
allows monitoring of
pump efficiency
Maximum
production requires
pump speed just
sufficient to pump
well-off i.e. fluid
level in annulus is
just above pump
Revised 2015
Gas Separators
A rod pump is designed to pump and lift liquids (no gas)
Gas should be separated from the produced liquids and
vented to annulus before it can enter the pump.
Gas entry into pump reduces pumping efficiency
Excessive gas entry will cause damage due to gas lock or
fluid pound.
Revised 2015
Gas Influx:
A simple Gas Anchor
Gas Influx reduces
pump efficiency
Placing pump
below perforations
maximises gas
separation capacity
Revised 2015
Gas Anchor
Revised 2015
Centralisers are
required in deviated /
crooked holes
Revised 2015
Pump Problems
Revised 2015
Dynamometer
Identifying Problems with Rod Pumps
Revised 2015
Diagnosis of Pump
Operating Problems
Problems such as excessive
friction, sticking plunger, gas
lock etc. need to be detected
Diagnosed from deviations
from ideal shape of the
dynanometer card
Upper & middle slides
illustrate theoretical cards
Lower picture is full
simulation
Revised 2015
Dynanometer
Cards
Inelastic rods
reflect perfect
up & down
movement
Stretching of
Elastic Rods
results in
gradual load
uptake
Revised 2015
Complete Dynanometer Card
starting from assumptions on the pump hardware (pump and rod type,
depth, size), flow conditions and design stroke rate or production rate,
and then
Revised 2015
ROD-PUMP DESIGN
Revised 2015
ROD-PUMP MODELLING
Revised 2015
ROD-PUMP MODELLING
Revised 2015
ROD-PUMP MODELLING
Revised 2015
Revised 2015
Revised 2015
Revised 2015
Revised 2015
Artificial Lift:
Electric Submersible Pump (ESP)
Revised 2015
AD&DISAD.
Revised 2015
General Characteristics of ESPs
Revised 2015
Electrical Submersible Pump (ESP)
A downhole centrifugal pump which lifts the
produced fluids to the surface.
Subsurface equipment
Electric motor, Downhole Sensors,
Protector or seal, Gas separator, Pump,
Cable
Surface equipment
Junction box, Switchboard or Variable
speed controller, Pump Monitoring
Instruments, Transformers
Revised 2015
-High Voltage electricity supply
- Variable Frequency-speed Drive
(VFD): soft start & speed control
- Vent box: seperates the surface
cable from the downhole cable
- Downhole Cable
- Pump unit {many (range of
impeller/diffuser pairs 10-100)
rotating centrifugal impellers with
stationary diffusers driven by shaft }
- Pump intake
- Protector/Seal
(barrier, motor oil expansion, thrust
absorber)
- Electric Motor
- Sensors (signal via cable)
Revised 2015
Centrifugal Pump
Multiple stages
Each stage consists of an
impeller and a diffuser
Impeller provides kinetic
energy by throwing fluid to
the edge of the impeller
Diffuser changes kinetic
energy into potential energy
(pressure) by reducing the
fluid velocity
Revised 2015
Electric Submersible
Pumps Applications
Revised 2015
ESP Motors
Generally 3 phase alternating current and 2 pole motors.
Consists of two main parts: the Rotor and Stator.
Pump performance is dependent on the frequency of the
electrical power.
The higher frequency the better the performance
Designed to run at 60 Hz in USA & 50 Hz (Europe)
may run at other frequencies (VFD).
Requires sufficient cooling from fluid flow past the motor to
operate properly-lack of cooling degrade the motor
Size ranges from 20 Hp to 1200 Hp
Revised 2015
Motor Protector or Seal
An important ESP downhole component (often overlooked)
Provides pressure equalization system for the motor
pressure and well annular pressure
Provides seal system to protect the motor winding from
the well fluids
Absorbs a significant portion of the up- & down-thrust
force.
Revised 2015
Gas Handling
Efficiency of standard ESP
centrifugal impeller reduces
when gas fraction > 20%
Mixed flow impellers can
handle up to 40% vol. gas
Greater Gas / Liquid ratios
require rotary gas separator
or gas anchor (shroud)
Vented casing required
Revised 2015
Junction Box
Vents gas that diffuses out of well via the cable
Prevents the gas from diffusing through cable and
creating an explosion hazard in the switchboard
Motor Controller
Starts and stops the motor
Provides current recording (amp chart)
Downhole sensor readout possible
Enables remote monitoring and control
Provides under and overload protection
Automatic shutdown following pump-off or gas-lock
Provision for automatic restart possible
Revised 2015
Check and Drain Valves
Check valve is installed to:
prevent back spin
reduce the volume of debris falling through
pump
reduce pump out time
Drain valve:
avoids pulling wet string
enables well killing by circulation
Revised 2015
Sensor Package
Measurements include:
Fluid intake & motor temperature
Pump suction / discharge pressures & temperatures
Vibration
Current leakage
Provides data on pump / motor operating conditions
Prevents dangerous motor conditions e.g. well pumped
off & attempt motor restart under backspin conditions
due to unloading of fluid in string
Data triggers alarms - analysed at wellsite or main office
Provides continuous FBHP measurements - data
transmitted to the surface via the power cable
Well test analysis after each pump shut down
Revised 2015
Basic Pump Selection
Max. Pump pressure difference
above annulus is +6,000 psi
Total Dynamic Head equals
difference between pump discharge and
suction pressure:
+ Fluid Hydrostatic head from ESP to
the surface is product of:
- (average) fluid density ()
- ESP vertical depth (TVD)
- acceleration due to gravity (g)
Friction loss in the tubing (Pfth)
The surface pressure (Psurf)
required to overcome flowline
back pressure (may be a high value
e.g. satellite wells 50 miles from the
host platform)
Revised 2015
Pump Performance
The pump head (P), or increase in pressure per stage,
is expressed in terms of the pressure generated by an
equivalent column of water (h).
P = *g*h
N.B. This needs correction for any changes in viscosity
Pump power = pump rate * the generated pump head or
Hydraulic Power = work done / time = q*P
Converted to required electric motor power via pump
efficiency (E)
E = hydraulic power (pump) / mechanical Power (motor)
Operate Pump operation within +10/-10% of max.
efficiency
Revised 2015
Pump Performance Chart
Revised 2015
ESP DESIGN
Revised 2015
ESP DESIGN
Revised 2015
ESP DESIGN
Revised 2015
ESP DESIGN
Revised 2015
Artificial Lift:
Gas Lift
Revised 2015
Gas Lift
Basics
Problem: The bottom hole pressure is too low to
support the fluid column in the well
Remedy: Reduce the density of the fluid column by
injecting gas into the tubing
Dilemma: Excess gas injection creates additional
back pressure which reduces production rate
Necessity: Optimise extra production for gas
injected
Revised 2015
A Continuous Flow
Gas Lift Completion
Gas Injection through
the operating valve
increases the
producing GLR
sufficiently to allow
the well to flow
Slug flow efficiently
moves liquid to the
surface
Revised 2015
Nodal Analysis for Gas Lift
Wellbore at perforation depth is node for Nodal Analysis
Inflow to Node (the perforations):
Preservoir Pdrawdown = Pperforations
Outflow from Node (the perforations):
Pseparator + Pflowline + Pchoke + P(tubing above operating
valve) + Ptubing below operating valve = Pperforations
Calculate using Multiphase flow correlations/gradient curves:-
Ptubing below operating valve: use the natural gas liquid ratio &
Ptubing above operating valve: use the enhanced gas liquid ratio
Revised 2015
achieved after lift gas injection
Benefit of deeper gas injection
Valve 4 - 500 psi drawdown
Valve 7 - 700 psi drawdown
30 psi/1000 ft
0.27 psi/ ft
0.44 psi/ ft
Revised 2015
Revised 2015
Effect of gas rate on well
production rate
Revised 2015
The Gas Lift System
Revised 2015
The Gas Lift
System: metering &
control equipment
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Applications
completions
Revised 2015
Describe the
advantages &
disadvantages Difficult to
achieve Low flow rate Interventio
of these Prevent liquid is difficult
optimum lift
completions fallback
Revised 2015
Gas lift design requirements
Maximise value of net oil production
inject gas at maximum economic rate as deep as possible
Maximise design flexibility due to uncertainties in
reservoir performance without sacrificing
production.
Range of reservoir pressures & PIs over well life
Range of watercuts over well life
Range of gas injection rates
Minimise well intervention
Particularly subsea wells!
wireline change of gas lift valves for dry trees < 60o
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Design: Questions to be Answered
176m 720mm
294m 508mm
161m Q/kl. nipeli Camco
995m 339,7mm
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
0 MMscf/d
1 MMscf/d
2 MMscf/d 10 MMscf/d
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Modelling
Revised 2015
Gas Lift Valve Mechanics
3 basic types of gas lift valve, each available in 1 & 1-1/2 sizes:
Revised 2015
Unloading Valves
Diaphragm/
Atmospheric Bellows
Spring
Stem Upstream/
Casing
Stem Tip
Upstream
Downstream
Port
Downstream/Tubing
Revised 2015
Unloading Valves
PRODUCED FLUID
2000
4000
DEPTH FTTVD
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
DRAWDOWN
TUBING PRESSURE
CASING PRESSURE FBHP SIBHP
Revised 2015
Unloading Gas Lift Valve
Normally required during unloading phase only
Open only when annulus and tubing pressures are high
enough to overcome valve set pressure
Valve closes after transfer to next station
May be spring or nitrogen charged
Revised 2015
Orifice Valves
Revised 2015
Operating Gas Lift Valve
Revised 2015