7 October 2017

To
Prof. Muchkund Dubey
President
Council for Social Development
New Delhi

Subject: Resignation from the post of Managing Editor, Samajik Vimarsh.

Dear Prof. Dubey,

I would like to convey my decision to withdraw myself from the responsibilities of Managing
Editor of Samajik Vimarsh, our important initiative conceived as a meaningful intervention in
the process of knowledge creation in Indian languages.

The letter from the Director, Dr. Ashok Pankaj dated 6 October 2017 to Ms. Neetu Kalra of
Sage asking her to withhold the process of publication of the journal without obtaining
registration number from RNI came as an extreme surprise to us. The CSD is well within its
right to seek a legal opinion and arrive at a decision when to publish its journal. What
pained us was the way it was rushed to her bypassing all normal channels of communication
with Sage regarding publication of Samajik Vimarsh throwing aside the established
democratic norms of functioning. The matter could have been discussed with the editorial
team of Samajik and with Prof Mohanty who has been in constant touch with Sage in this
regard. Of course, we always kept the administration of CSD in loop marking all the
correspondence with Sage in this regard to the Director and discussing new developments
in person from time to time. In this case, instead of rushing a letter to Sage the CSD
administration could have called us and discussed the issue and asked us to communicate
the decision to withhold the publication to Sage. Instead, while we were in final stages of
closing the inaugural 2017 issue of the journal this unilateral letter was sent to Sage and a
copy was marked to editor and managing editor of the journal.

I do not think there was any emergency situation where such rash action was required as
any publication has its own process which takes time. As an accomplished author you are
well aware that there is a time gap between submission of a manuscript and actual
production. Hence the manner in which this letter was rushed to Sage was totally uncalled
for.

But this is not the first time that the CSD administration has formed an opinion and acted in
haste violating all decency and democratic norms. It seems the personnel manning the
administration are not fully convinced of utility of bringing out a Hindi journal from CSD. I
am listing some incidents where the administration particularly the Director tried to stall
the publication process.
1. After taking over as Director of the CSD, Dr. Ashok Pankaj first raised the issue that
being an FCRA holder we are not allowed to publish a newspaper (according to him
journals are also issued license as a newspaper by RNI as there is no such category as
journal in the Act). That time too the Director violated the normal channels of
communication with Sage by calling a meeting with its representatives bypassing the
Vice-President who has been in-charge of communication and negotiations with
Sage. Anyway, the situation was clarified to him that academic journals are a
separate category and there is no legal provision prohibiting CSD from bringing out
an academic journal.

2. Then, doubts were raised that maybe due to editorial teams political views the
government was delaying the registration. We tried to clarify to you and to the
Director that this is a normal procedural delay which requires approval of more than
eight ministries and departments of the government. Since publication of a journal is
not on the priority list of the concerned ministries, the delay could be a result of the
normal bureaucratic lethargy our government departments suffer from

3. Since the registration process got stuck with delayed approvals from various
ministries and departments, Sage decided to explore other ways of expediting the
process and applied to RNI through licensing branch of Delhi Police. This accelerated
the process. But again there were attempts on part of the CSD administration to
scuttle the process by not supplying the required documents for submission in time.
On one occasion, the attempt was allowed to time out and Sage had to start over
the whole process once again. This time fortunately a title was secured by the Sage
team for our journal. We all were very enthused and were waiting for registration
number to be allotted after the verification process is over.

4. Meanwhile, I received a letter from Ms. Pallavipushpa Sinha of Sage on 28

September 2017 requesting us to submit the final contents list of the first issue by 30
September 2017 and all the material by 5 October 2017 as they wished to ready the
journal for publication by November end. I thought that they just wanted to keep
everything ready so that when the registration number came there was no further
delay in publication of the journal. Later, Ms. Neetu Kalra clarified that they intend
to go ahead with its publication while continuing to pursue the process of obtaining
the registration number. Accordingly, we started working overtime in consultation
with Prof. Mohanty to complete the process in time and shared with them all the
material. We were waiting for your message to readers, as promised by you to Prof.
Apoorvanand.

5. Giving the journal a sound footing involved creating an ecosystem to support and
encourage scholarship in Indian languages. Towards this we proposed a series of
 activities like monthly discussion forums, inviting young scholars to share their
research findings, organising writers workshops, etc. In fact, the Director himself
proposed a series of lectures on pluralism which we incorporated in our proposed
activities and roped in Shri Ashok Vajpeyi to deliver the first lecture. The Director
without discussing with us stopped the AO from booking a space at IIC. He even did
not show the decency to call us for a discussion over the issue, instead chose to
instruct the AO not to entertain our request. This compromised not only our
standing but the whole organisations prestige. We still kept quiet in order to
maintain the decorum and dignity of the institution and its management.

This is just to list a few instances where we felt our authority as editors of the journal,
personal integrity and public standing is being undermined deliberately.

Sir, let me clarify here that we never tried to conceal our political views. In fact, you were
well aware of our political views before inviting us to join you in bringing out this journal. It
would be a gross misinterpretation of facts to say that we ever intended to use this journal
as a platform to propagate one type of view. We are firm believer in plurality of views based
on a sound system of academic rigour. Hence we invited authors and chose articles which
represent this plurality of methodology and understanding. We were always willing to go
extra mile to accommodate differing opinions.

I would like to mention that Sage requested us to withdraw one particular review of Praful
Bidwais book on left movements in India as it mentioned JNU disturbances last year. The
Sage representative suggested dropping this piece from the first issue on the basis of their
informal chat with a clerk at the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. Against my
conscience I agreed to accede to their request despite the fact that the review in question
was highly critical of left politics pointing out its failings and mistakes.

There was another instance of an article analysing the Una incident and the dalit upsurge in
its aftermath. Again this article was pointing out the failings of the dalit movement and left
politics in general. The Director even without looking at the abstract of the article formed an
opinion on the basis of its title and insisted on dropping it. Since we had already decided to
defer its publication as it had become somewhat dated in the light of results of UP elections
and developments since then, we preferred not enter into any argument with him.

Sir, I am a Marxist but being a Marxist is no crime or stigma. Marxism is a philosophical and
methodological category used by scholars all over the world to understand social realities
and give direction to processes of social change. Yes, it is true that Marxist traditions in India
and elsewhere have lacked inner democracy, and persons in power have misused it to foster
an ideological uniformity. But this is equally true of other methodological and ideological
persuasions as well, be it rightist or liberal. The lack of democratic values and norms is a
much deeper question and the scholars and activists all over the world are grappling to
understand it and devise ways to counter such tendencies. There is no dearth of people
coming from within Marxist traditions raising the issue of democratic deficit in the
established left movements. I too belong to the category of people who repose their faith in
pluralist and dialogic traditions.

When I was told that the direction of most of the articles was anti-government, I was
surprised. As editors all we were concerned with was whether the articles we were
selecting were sound in their method and represented rigorous scholarship.

I have a great respect for you as a scholar and a public personality. I joined the CSD thinking
that I may be able to contribute meaningfully to the Indian scholarship under your and
CSDs distinguished facultys guidance. But it seems that CSD too suffers from same kind of
mediocrity and absence of democratic spirit afflicting other institutions in India.

Since the process of publication of the journal has been stopped unilaterally and our
standing as editors has been challenged and compromised systematically I do not think
there is any point in my continuing at CSD. This letter should be considered a notice to
terminate my current contract ending on 20 January 2018 with immediate effect.

I must take this opportunity to express my gratitude to academic colleagues and staff who
made me feel at home at CSD and extended all the help and guidance in my work as
managing editor and communication advisor of the CSD.

With warm regards,

Dhruva Narayan