Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Appendix 3.
Guidelines for Estimating Effect Size
Common methods for estimating responsiveness, i.e., sensitivity to change, are dis-
tribution based. Figure 1 illustrates some of these methods. They are explained fur-
ther in the literature [4, 5].
If variance is not reported, a simple relative change can be estimated by using the
difference in the mean between the baseline and the followup divided by the mean
value at the baseline.
To calculate the effect size (ES), the difference in the means between measure-
ment points (e.g., between baseline and followup) is divided by a measure of vari-
ance (e.g., the standard deviation at the baselin: Effect Size I). This formula can be
directly transferred to comparisons between groups (i.e., difference in means
between groups divided by the summed standard deviation for the groups).
To calculate the Standardized Response Mean (SRM), the difference between two
measurement points is divided by the standard deviation for the difference in a
group. The formula can be directly generalized to comparisons between groups
(i.e., the difference in means between two measurement points in the groups divid-
ed by the summed standard deviation for this difference).
These methods provide information about the importance of an identified differ-
ence when using different types of instruments with different scoring and ranges
of variation, i.e., how well one can distinguish the signal from the noise. To
achieve more uniform assessments, the methodology is appearing more often in
scientific reporting of treatment effects.
Method Formula