Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Region IV-A CALABARZON
DIVISION OF SAN PABLO CITY
San Pablo City

ENHANCED SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ESIP) APPRAISAL TOOL

School ID: ___________School Name: ___________________________________________ Date Submitted: ___________

School Head: __________________________________District: ______________________Contact No.: _______________

Observed
Description Criteria Pre- Final Comment/Observation
Appraisal Review
Endorsement Letter Is there an organized School Planning Team YES YES
composed of but not limited to the School NO NO
Head, Teachers Representative, Parents
Representative, Students and Brgy. or LGU
Representatives indicating their signatures
in the endorsement letter in a suggested
format?
Approval Sheet Is there an approval sheet in a suggested YES YES
format? NO NO

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive Summary Is there an executive summary of the over- YES YES
all conduct of the Planning Process, NO NO
including the discussion of but not limited
to the legal bases, its purpose and the
planning process?
INTRODUCTION
A. Vision, Mission Are the DepEd Vision, Mission and Core YES YES
and Core Values Values stated? NO NO
B. School Situation Is there a complete, logical and concise YES YES
presentation of school situation based on NO NO
the assessment of the following:
a. current status of children
b. status and trends in the realization of
the schools contributions to the
achievement of the Division Goals and
Objectives
c. school systems and processes that
facilitate and hinder the attainment of
school objectives and targets
K to 12 (PRIORITY IMPROVEMENT AREAS) (Only applicable learning stage(s) to the school should be included)
K to Grade 3 Is there a logical narrative discussion of the YES YES
Grade 4 to 6 schools prioritization of the most pressing NO NO
Grade 7 to 10 needs or problems that surfaced in school
Grade 11 to 12 and learners data that contributes to the
(discussion for each schools intermediate outcomes for Access
learning stage) and Quality?
Are the priority areas clearly stated with an YES YES
evident linkage to with an evident linkage NO NO
to the Departments Vision, Mission and
Core Values?

Are the priority areas directed towards

improving school effectiveness?

1|Page: ESIP APPRAISAL TOOL

 GOVERNANCE
Governance Is there a logical narrative discussion of the YES YES
schools prioritization of the most pressing NO NO
needs or problems that are school
governance-related and contribute to the
organizations governance intermediate
outcomes?
MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Content Is the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan YES YES
comprehensive and complete? NO NO

Validity and Feasibility Is the Monitoring and Evaluation Plan YES YES
technically and managerially feasible? NO NO
ANNUAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (Year 1)
Content Is the required detailed content (as suggested YES YES
by the format) provided for the plan and is NO NO
aligned with all other related documents?
Validity and Feasibility Is the plan technically, financially, and YES YES
managerially feasible and sustainable? NO NO
ANNEXES
Are the following School-Community Data Profile YES YES
Annexes included with NO NO
complete and concise Child Mapping Tool YES YES
data and used proper NO NO
template? Child-friendly School Survey YES YES
NO NO
Child Protection Policy Implementation YES YES
Checklist NO NO
Student-Led School Watching YES YES
NO NO
Gap Analysis YES YES
NO NO
Priority Improvement Areas YES YES
NO NO
Planning Worksheet YES YES
NO NO
School Process YES YES
NO NO
Root Cause Analysis YES YES
NO NO
Project Work Plans and Budget Matrices YES YES
NO NO
School Report Card (SRC) Summary of YES YES
Information NO NO
School Report Card (SRC) YES YES
NO NO
Action Taken: Pre-Appraisal: Date: ______________ Final Review: Date: ______________
(please check For final review For recommending approval
appropriate box) Return to proponent for enhancements For recommending approval but need to
based on comments/suggestions incorporate suggestions to enhance the plan
Return to proponent for enhancements
Comments: ____________________________ Comments: ____________________________
______________________________________ ______________________________________

PRE-APPRAISED BY:

_____________________________________
Public Schools District Supervisor
REVIEWED BY:

___________________________________
Division Appraisal Committee Member

2|Page: ESIP APPRAISAL TOOL