Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
in/>
5. That present applicant respondent knew the complainant and her family
members before marriage since more than 20 years and knowing about them
the respondent without any demand of dowry directly/indirectly, without
giving or taking any dowry of whatsoever nature married main applicant
wife since both families knew one another since long.
10. It is admitted fact that father of complainant has also been tried
for murder case; this fact is also admitted by the father of complainant
and main applicant and is on material on record.
11. That Respondent stays in ________ since he was 17 years of age and
continues to stay there, these above facts in paragraph 3 and paragraph
4 were not known and were kept hidden from the respondent and family,
this amount to cruelty upon the present applicant respondent and his
family members.
13. Respondent had to move Honorable High court of Allahabad for relief
u/s 482 Cr.P.C and Stay Arrest until filing of Charge sheet was granted
by Honorable High Court of Allahabad.
14. Main Applicant wife filed one more private complaint dated
23.08.2006 with J.M Court Number 13 again u/s 498a, 323, 504, 506 and 34
of IPC and u/s of The Dowry Prohibition Act, on same grounds and same
facts which should be null and void as per 300(1) Cr.P.C and to avoid
double jeopardy.
15. Respondent again moved Honorable High court of Allahabad for relief
u/s 482 Cr.P.C. and Honorable High Court of Allahabad directed for
consolidation of both cases of 498a and directed to submit report under
173 Cr.P.C. in consolidation, the said Order from Honorable High Court
of Allahabad is annexed as Annexure "A".
16. Executive machinery police has filed a final "B Summary" report u/s
173 Cr.P.C on 14.02.2007. Main applicant wife has filed a protest
application the order is passed, and upon which 1477/10 is initiated.
17. That Main applicant wife has filed false Maintenance Case u/s 125
Cr.P.C, Case No. ____/05 on __.__.2005, in J.M Court Fatehpur. Against
husband who is otherwise a student, and is allegedly stated that he
earns 20,000 Rs, which is false and imaginary to which no proof could be
established and is unnecessary tactics used by applicant who is well
aware of court procedures; And 125 Cr.P.C proceedings, relief to the
wife were prohibited and application by applicant wife was dismissed at
the outset.
18. The Maintenance case 125 Cr.P.C beyond doubt was dismissed by way of
long and lengthy speaking order; as per Order Annexed as Annexure "B".
20. On the contrary, Main Applicant wife in her sworn affidavit and
submissions in Case of u/s 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, Case Number __/06 in
the J.M. Court Number 1 on page number 6 "dafa no. 8" , states that she
was being assaulted by respondent and family members during such time
the servant who also worked in Main Applicants home also, saw this and
went and informed family of Main applicant wife, and the same was
communicated to family of main applicant by the applicant over telephone
that there was nothing , But hearing this , since the distance between
Main Applicant and Respondent is very negligible and can be reached in
less than 5 minutes by walk; Father, Mother, Brother and some relatives
came to respondent home and after discussing the matter was resolved,
but that continued and then thereafter main applicant was forced to
leave Matrimonial home and go to parental home.
21. These prima facie facts of the submissions of main applicants and
her family members as per paragraph 13 and 14 of this application above,
who have moved the court of law and initiated process that is otherwise,
abuse the law, that is otherwise for destitute women application but is
utilized for harassment making use of law as a weapon and tool to make
innocent family members face criminal trial, which amounts to a very
serious nature, The application moved by main applicant wife being not
maintainable and she has suppressed the relevant facts and application
being false , baseless, vexatious, imaginary. And hence do not make out
any prima facie case against the respondents so as to summon the
respondents to face trial and in this circumstances taking cognizance
against the respondents is bad in law and is untenable in the court of
law, cannot be sustained, that it amounts to abuse of the process of
Hon'ble court.
22. The facts mentioned and maintained by applicant wife are contrary to
applicant wife's father in different litigations about same event on
same date ; The applicants self same submissions are contrary to her own
self substantiate facts
23. That the application filed by main applicant wife during various
times have changed the facts according to the need of context and sense
of urgency and has manipulated facts with willful intention, while
submitting information to the Ld Court, in various court of law, in
cases filed by main applicant wife; the facts are imaginary and false,
and this amounts to grave misuse of court of law and interference in the
administration of justice and denying the liberty to the real victims,
here respondent and family members.
24. The changing facts and misuse by main applicant wife, amount to
disturbing the purity of law and damaging the serenity of the stream of
justice and interferes in the administration of justice thereby
performing acts of perjury in every application in the notion of
applicant wife that law is meant for harassment and since the applicant
is a female will be exempted for her cruelty and using judicial system
for her barbaric acts upon the respondent and his family members and
destroying image and reputation.
25. The persons who use the court of law for their private and personal
vendetta should be punished severely so as to curb the menace of
misusing and harassing the innocent families, such cases should become
the highlight cases and offenders should be sternly dealt with, without
looking at the gender or caste or creed, which are not exempted from
Article 15(3) of Constitution Of India.
26. The main applicant wife has willfully and with malafide intentions
has filed the instant application, which is devoid of any merit and is
interference in the administration of justice.
27. The Main Applicant wife has also filed Application u/s 12 of "The
Protection of women from Domestic violence, Act". U/s 18/19 of the said
Act, On 30.05.2009, case number __/09, in the CJ.M Court Fatehpur.
28. The Main Applicant has filed the matter against Respondent, his
____________, ______________, also has roped and implicated brother Of
respondent ______________________without any cause of action, again
fabricating evidence that she was assaulted on false and fabricated grounds.
30. That clearly the domestic violence application was also moved with
the willful intention to injure and harass the respondent and family
members and using court of law as a weapon for harassment.
32. The main applicant has also fabricated medical report in the
domestic violence to prima facie prove Domestic Violence, and the
incidents alleged. The facts mentioned by main applicant wife are
absolutely ambiguous and imaginary has suppressed the relevant facts and
application being false, baseless, vexatious, and imaginary. And hence
do not make out any prima facie case against the respondents so as to
summon the respondents to face trial and in this circumstances taking
cognizance against the respondents is bad in law and cannot be sustained
it amounts to abuse of the process of Hon'ble court if without prima
case having being made out a person is summoned to face trial.
33. The application of main applicant's wife under section 125 Cr.P.C
that was rejected and dismissed by Ld Court. The order was challenged by
wife and the same was again rejected in session's court while under
revision, Revision Order is annexed as Annexure "D".
34. The Main Applicant wife has concealed and suppressed true facts,
submitted under oath has false submissions under oath, and more so are
contrary to the submissions to this honorable court, which are
perjurious in nature.
35. The main applicant wife in her complaints / applications until year
April 2011, made no whisper of any Bengali girl with whom
_______________had any intimation relation, In Application under
affidavit filed by applicant wife u/s 9 of Hindu Marriage Act it is
alleged that photo of Bengali girl was with ___________________
displayed to applicant wife and he started kissing the photo in front of
Applicant wife. That the facts are baseless and imaginary and are false
and fabricated and such cruel acts are performed since year 2005 where
she didn't even spend more than 21 hours.
37. From above instances and admitted facts and arising facts after long
and more than 5 years. That main applicant wife is a habitual offender
and having two sisters who have filed 498a against upon their respective
in-laws, and father being tried for murder case, is continuously over
the years since marriage of one single day, has filed application after
application using courts as weapon to dominate the family of in-laws and
to grab the land and money of in-laws, to satisfy her needs and her
individual principles, she has been attempting to interfere the
administration of justice, it is imperative to punish such litigants,
who are using heavy hands in the name of weaker section and destroying
the very purpose of legislations provided to weaker sections of the society.
38. The applicant wife has filed an application , This new application
that was meant to delay and prevent her substantiation of submissions,
which stands rejected, In this application she demanded that she will
not appear in the court of law until 40 Lakhs Bond was not filled, in
matter of Restitution of conjugal rights u/s 9 Of Hindu Marriage Act.
40. In the Trial of 125 Cr.P.C, PW1 The complainant wife substantiated
that my father is poor and she has two sisters and father cannot
maintain her, In-laws are rich, And PW2, the father of complainant wife
in his substantiating evidences, under oath stated that he is poor and
he cannot fulfill the maintenance required to his daughter and his
daughter also cannot maintain herself.
43. Applicant being legally bound by oath in this Hon'ble Court to state
truth in her affidavit but the applicant and her witness has with
knowledge and willful intention have deposed false in their affidavit
and substantiated evidences. Applicant has being knowingly and
intentionally given false statements in judicial proceedings.
44. From above facts and instances, it is clear and loud, that this main
application by wife is false, fabricate, contrary to statements
maintained in the honorable court by the self-same applicant wife, That
it is proven on material record, the statements made under oath are
contrary and injurious to respondents in the instant complaint made by
applicant wife.
45. Respondent states that the applicant wife is a guilty of the Act of
perjury by making false statements, on oath solemnly affirming,
willfully and knowingly that those Statements are false, in "AFFIDAVITs"
on various dates submitted by her in this Hon'ble court with oblique
motive to misguide and mislead this Hon'ble court with a view to extort
money where as she is not entitled for any relief under the said Act.
46. The facts mentioned and maintained by applicant wife are contrary to
applicant wife's father in different litigations about same event on
same date ; The applicants self same submissions are contrary to her own
self substantiate facts
47. Respondent states that the material on record before this Hon'ble
Court prima facie proves that the applicant has committed the act of
perjury in her submission and the same has been described in detail.
50. Respondent states that, the applicant has made the following
willfully perjurious, intentionally deposed false and misleading
statements on oath solemnly affirming, in her aforesaid "AFFIDAVITs"
submitted by herself in this Hon'ble court with oblique motives and are
verified and Prohibitory Orders also have recognized as false by the
respective Ld. Court. Which clearly proves that the main applicant wife
is deposing false on affidavit in reply in this Hon'ble Court on her
whims and fancies thereby committing the act of perjury by giving false
evidence during the judicial proceedings in this Hon'ble court? Hence
applicant wife is punishable for the act of perjury, which adversely
affects the administration of justice.
51. Respondent states that, Applicant filed the Affidavit filed by main
applicant wife in applications submitted an Application under this
instant Ld Court. are false, vexatious, concocted and misconceived to
harass the Respondents and make him/them to run from pillar to post,
Respondent states that applicant has not come with clean hands before
this Hon'ble Court and suppressed material facts intentionally, creating
new facts as delaying tactics and denying early justice, thereby
interfering in the administration of justice. It is pertinent to note
that applicant is only interested in making ambiguous and vexatious
allegation against the respondent without any iota of evidence in
support of her submissions and trying to mislead and misguide this
Hon'ble court by making vague allegation against the respondent.
Respondent states that petitioner has not come to the court in clean
hands and this material fact have been intentionally suppressed and
concealed or created on self-imaginations knowingly from this Hon'ble
Court in the main application to mislead this Hon'ble Court, this is
very clear and has been proved with substantial evidence by the respondent.
52. In order to appreciate the aforesaid aspect, I deem it necessary to
reproduce the relevant provisions of the Cr.P.C.:
(d) Take sufficient security for the appearance for the accused before
such Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is non-bailable and the court
thinks it necessary so to do send the accused in custody to such
Magistrate; and
(e) Bind over any person to appear and give evidence before such Magistrate
...
...
(b) (i) Of any offence punishable under any of the following sections of
the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860), namely, Sections 193 to 196 (both
inclusive), 199, 200, 205 to 211 (both inclusive) and 228, when such
offence is alleged to have been committed in, or in relation to, any
proceeding in any court, or
53. 14. Respondent states that thus material on record before this
Hon'ble court and perusual of detail aforesaid description in this
application clearly proves that applicant has committed act of perjury
by intentionally giving enormous false and fabricated evidence during
judicial proceeding in this Hon'ble court by submitting false in her
"AFFIDAVITs". Thus filing false affidavit in the court of law, causes
obstruction in the course of justice and also adversely affecting the
administration of justice. Also applicant cannot be permitted to take
liberty of spoiling purity of justice. In this facts and circumstances,
the respondent has filed this present application in this Hon'ble Court
in exercise of jurisdiction of this Hon'ble court u/s 340(1) of thr
Cr.P.C, 1973. against the main applicant wife and it is to expedient in
the interest of justice to prosecute the applicant as prima facie
evidences are adduced in that behalf. Hence applicant is punishable for
the act of perjury, adversely affecting the administration of justice.
54. Respondent further states that all adverse allegations and incidents
mentioned/deposed by the applicant in this Hon'ble court had never
happened and the same are false, baseless, malicious, vexatious,
concocted, futile and imaginary story made intentionally to harass
respondent from court to court across Uttar Pradesh states and put
respondents under pressure by misusing the provision of law conveniently
and cunningly in attempt to extort money from the respondent. it goes to
show that, the main applicant wife is only interested in making
ambiguous and vexatious allegations against the respondent without any
iota of evidence in support of her submissions and trying to misguide
the Hon'ble court by making vague allegations against respondent and
whatever allegations where sole testimony of main applicant. In fact
there is no proper allegation against the respondent. Respondent states
and submits that, the continuation of prosecution against the respondent
is not only the abuse of process of law, but also defeats the ends of
the justice. The Applicant 's application u/s 498a, 323, 504, 506, 34 of
IPC and of The Dowry Prohibition Acts devoid of merits and deserves to
be dismissed with exemplary costs and suitable punishment in the
interest of justice.
55. I say that therefore, it is clear from the above Para that the
petitioner is guilty of the act of perjury, as she has made the
aforesaid false statements on oath with solemn affirmation providing
false information to this Hon'ble court, willingly and knowingly that
the same are false and the respondent has submitted the documentary
evidences that those statements are false. In these circumstances, the
respondent has filed this present application in this Hon'ble court in
exercise of jurisdiction of this Hon'ble court u/s 340(1) of the cr.p.c,
1973. Against the petitioner and it is expedient in the interest of
justice to prosecute the petitioner as Prima Facie evidences are adduced
in that behalf.
56. Respondent adopt each and every statement, submission and averments
made in this application, that all statements are from applicant wife's
applications and are brought forth to the notice of the instant Ld. Court.
57. Respondent craves leave of this Hon'ble court to add, to alter and
amend this application. Respondent carves leave to add, alter and amend
this application.
58. Respondent had not filed any other application for the act of
perjury committed by the applicant in this Hon'ble court against the
applicant in any other Hon'ble court.
59. Respondent has not filed any other application for the act of
perjury against the petitioner, either in this Hon'ble court or any
other Hon'ble court for the subject matter hereto.
e. Kindly pass such other suitable orders as may deem fit and proper to
meet the ends of justice in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the
case.
AND FOR THIS ACT OF KINDNESS AND JUSTICE, THE ABOVENAMED RESPONDENT AS
IN DUTY BOUND SHALL EVER PRAY.
Solemnly affirmed at _________.
Dated; this ____day of December, 2010.
Respondent
V E R I F I C A T I O N
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
No comments:
Post a Comment
<http://www.blogger.com/comment-iframe.g?
blogID=6123215224562786963&postID=210900966889456720&blogspotRpcToken=5919673>
Newer Post
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/perjury-information.html>
Older Post
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/an-article-on-perjury.html>
Home <http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/>
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.com/feeds/210900966889456720/comments/default>
Blog Archive
* <javascript:void(0)> 2013
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/search?updated-min=2013-01-01T00:00:00-
08:00&updated-max=2014-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=1>
(1)
o <javascript:void(0)> January
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2013_01_01_archive.html> (1)
* <javascript:void(0)> 2012
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/search?updated-min=2012-01-01T00:00:00-
08:00&updated-max=2013-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=25>
(25)
o <javascript:void(0)> November
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012_11_01_archive.html> (5)
o <javascript:void(0)> October
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012_10_01_archive.html> (17)
+ http://bharatchugh.wordpress.com
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/httpbharatchugh.html>
+ FIR can be quashed --SC
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/fir-can-be-quashed-sc.html>
+ Arrest Proceedures and Rights
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/arrest-proceedures-and-
rights.html>
+ quashing of fir --SC --dowry/ cruelty 498a on eld...
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/quashing-of-fir-sc-dowry-
cruelty-498a.html>
+ Fir quashing of parents in 498a -- mala fide/ulter...
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/fir-quashing-of-parents-in-
498a-mala.html>
+ You tube --SC judgement on misuse of 498a and need...
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/you-tube-sc-judgement-on-
misuse-of-498a.html>
+ Some tips to fight case and on Burden of proof
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/some-tips-to-fight-case-
and-burden-of.html>
+ Special Power OF Attorney Format and judgements
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/special-power-of-attorney-
format-and.html>
+ Perjury Information
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/perjury-information.html>
+ Perjury petition format
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/perjury-petition-
format.html>
+ An Article on perjury
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/an-article-on-perjury.html>
+ Perjury citations
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/perjury-citations.html>
+ Divorce under Hindu Law
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/divorce-under-hindu-
law.html>
+ Discharge Petition Format -- 2 for 498a
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/discharge-petition-format-
2-for-498a.html>
+ Judgements for DISCHARGE u/s 239
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/judgements-for-discharge-
us-239.html>
+ 239 crpc discharge petition Format 1
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/239-crpc-discharge-
petition-format-1.html>
+ Youtube Channel to Keep Watching Lot of Inform...
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012/10/youtube-channel-to-keep-
watching-lot-of.html>
o <javascript:void(0)> September
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012_09_01_archive.html> (1)
o <javascript:void(0)> July
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012_07_01_archive.html> (1)
o <javascript:void(0)> April
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2012_04_01_archive.html> (1)
* <javascript:void(0)> 2011
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/search?updated-min=2011-01-01T00:00:00-
08:00&updated-max=2012-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=21>
(21)
o <javascript:void(0)> December
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2011_12_01_archive.html> (1)
o <javascript:void(0)> November
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2011_11_01_archive.html> (2)
o <javascript:void(0)> July
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2011_07_01_archive.html> (2)
o <javascript:void(0)> May
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2011_05_01_archive.html> (16)
* <javascript:void(0)> 2010
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/search?updated-min=2010-01-01T00:00:00-
08:00&updated-max=2011-01-01T00:00:00-08:00&max-results=3>
(3)
o <javascript:void(0)> November
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2010_11_01_archive.html> (1)
o <javascript:void(0)> September
<http://sagittarius498a.blogspot.in/2010_09_01_archive.html> (2)
<//www.blogger.com/rearrange?
blogID=6123215224562786963&widgetType=BlogArchive&widgetId=BlogArchive1&action=edit
Widget§ionId=sidebar-right-1>