Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Research Article
Mathematical Analysis of Casson Fluid Model for
Blood Rheology in Stenosed Narrow Arteries
Copyright 2013 J. Venkatesan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The flow of blood through a narrow artery with bell-shaped stenosis is investigated, treating blood as Casson fluid. Present results are
compared with the results of the Herschel-Bulkley fluid model obtained by Misra and Shit (2006) for the same geometry. Resistance
to flow and skin friction are normalized in two different ways such as (i) with respect to the same non-Newtonian fluid in a normal
artery which gives the effect of a stenosis and (ii) with respect to the Newtonian fluid in the stenosed artery which spells out the
non-Newtonian effects of the fluid. It is found that the resistance to flow and skin friction increase with the increase of maximum
depth of the stenosis, but these flow quantities (when normalized with non-Newtonian fluid in normal artery) decrease with the
increase of the yield stress, as obtained by Misra and Shit (2006). It is also noticed that the resistance to flow and skin friction
increase (when normalized with Newtonian fluid in stenosed artery) with the increase of the yield stress.
1
Integrating (10) and then simplifying, one can get
a = 0.1
0.9
a = 0.2 3 16 1/2 4 1 4
= {1 ( ) + ( ) ( ) } .
0.8 4 7 3 21
a = 0.3
(11)
R/R0
0.7
a = 0.4
0.6 Since / 1, neglecting the term involving ( / )4 in
a = 0.5
(11), we get the expression for flow rate as
0.5
0.4 3 16 1/2 4
1.5 1 0.5 = {1 ( ) + ( )} . (12)
0 0.5 1 1.5 4 7 3
z
Figure 2: Stenosis geometries for different values of stenosis height Using (8) in (12), we get
.
128 8 64 2
= + ( 3 )+ 3
.
Figure 2. The percentage of stenosis is given by 0 / 100. In 49 147 7 147
the present study, we have taken = 5 cm and = 2 as taken (13)
by Misra and Shit [17].
Figure 3(a) depicts the shapes of stenoses with different Neglecting the term involving 2 in (13), we get
lengths by fixing = 0.2 and keeping as variable (for
different values of stenosis the length 0 with fixed value of
= 2). Figure 3(b) shows the shapes of stenoses with differ- 128 8 64
= + + . (14)
ent lengths by fixing = 0.2 and varying the values of (for 49 4 7 3
different values of and with a fixed value of 0 = 1.5). It
is noticed that the width of the stenosis decreases with the
Integrating (14) along the length of the artery and using the
increase in the values of .
conditions that = 1 at = and = 2 at = , we
Equations (1) and (2) have to be solved with the help of
obtain
the following no slip boundary condition:
= 0 at = () , (5) 128 8
1 2 = +
490 (/0 ) 0 (/0 )4
4
and the regularity condition
(15)
is finite at = 0. (6) 64
+ .
7 05 (/ )5/2
0
3. Method of Solution
Simplifying (15), one can obtain the following expression for
Integrating (1) and then using (6), we get
pressure drop:
= . (7) 0
2 256
1 2 = {( 0 ) + }
From (7), the skin friction is obtained as 49 0 0 (/ 0)
0
16
= , (8) + 4
{( 0 ) + 4
}
2 0 0 (/ )
0
where = (). 0
The volumetric flow rate is as follows: 128
+ 5
{( 0 ) + 5/2
}.
7 0 0 (/ )
3 2 0
= () , (9) (16)
3 0
where and are given by (7) and (8), respectively. 3.1. Resistance to Flow. The resistance to flow is defined as
Substituting (2) into (9), we get follows:
3 2 1 2 1 2
= ( ) . (10) = . (17)
3
4 Journal of Applied Mathematics
1 1
0.9 0.9
L 0 = 0.5 m=6
L0 = 1 m=5
R/R0
R/R0
0.8
L 0 = 1.5 0.8 m=4
m=3
L0 = 2 m=2
0.7 0.7 m=1
0.6 0.6
1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
z z
(a) (b)
Figure 3: (a) Shapes of the arterial stenosis for different values of the stenosis length 0 . (b) Shapes of the arterial stenosis for different values
of the stenosis shape parameter .
The resistance to flow for Casson fluid in a stenosed artery is In the absence of any constriction ( = 0 and = 0 ), the
obtained as follows: resistance to flow (in the normal artery) is given by the
0
following:
256
= {( 0 ) + }
490 0 (/0 )
0 16 16 8
16 = { 3+ + }. (19)
+ 4
{( 0 ) + 4
} (18) 0 0 49 7 03
0 0 (/ )
0
0
128
+ 5
{( 0 ) + 5/2
}. The expression for resistance to flow in the dimensionless
7 0 0 (/ )
0 form is obtained as follows:
3 3
1 (16 /49) 1 + (/0 ) 2 + (8/7) ( /0 )3
1 = =1 0 + ( ), (20)
(16 /49) + (/3 ) + (8/7) /3
0 0
where 1 = 0 0 (/(/0 )), 2 = 0 0 (/(/0 )4 ), and 3 = Using a two-point Gauss quadrature formula, the integrals in
0 (21) are evaluated as follows:
0 /(/0 )(5/2) .
It is noted that 1 measures the relative resistance in a
stenosed artery compared to normal artery. Substituting the
expression for /0 from (4), the integrals 1 , 2 , and 3 are
0 1
reduced to the following: 1 = [
2 (1 20 /12)(4+23) )
(
0 1
+ ],
1 = 2
, (1 ( 0 /12)(423) )
2
0 (1 )
0 0 [
1
2 = , (21) 2 =
0 (1 2
4
) 2 (1 ( 0 /12)(4+23) )4
2
[
0
1
3 = 5/2
. + ],
2
0 (1 ) (1 (20 /12)(423)
4
) ]
Journal of Applied Mathematics 5
0 [ 1 where
3 =
2 (1 (20 /12)(4+23) )5/2
[ 16
= , (24)
04
1 ].
+ 5/2
( 0 /12)(423) )
2
(1 ] which is obtained from (18) with = 0, () = 0 , and = 0.
(22)
3.2. Skin Friction. From (8) and (14), the expression for the
If we want to compare the resistance to flow for different fluid skin friction is obtained as follows:
models, we have to normalize it with respect to resistance
to flow of Newtonian fluid in normal artery, and the
respective expression for Casson fluid model is obtained as 64 4 32
= = + + . (25)
follows: 2 49 3 7 3
2 =
In the absence of any constriction when (() = 0 ), the
expression for the skin friction becomes the following:
3 3
16 0 8
= (1 + ( )+ 0)
49 7 64 4 32
= + + . (26)
(23) 49 03 7 03
3
0 1 16
(1 ) + ( ( 0 ) 1
49 The nondimensional form of skin friction with effects on
stenosis is defined as the ratio between the skin friction in the
3 stenosed artery and skin friction in the normal artery. From
8
+2 + 0 3 ) , (25) and (26), the skin friction with effects on stenosis is
7
obtained as
3 1/2 33/2 3
4 + (32/7) ( 0 ) (/0 ) + (64/49) 0 (/0 )
1 = = . (27)
3 1/2
(/0 ) {4 + (32/7) ( 03 ) + (64/49) 03 }
The nondimensional form of skin friction with effects on such as skin friction, resistance to flow, and flow rate. The
the non-Newtonian behavior of blood is defined as the ratio following parameters with their ranges mentioned as : 0
between the skin friction of the non-Newtonian fluid in the 1, : 2.07.0 (CP) /sec1 , : 0.00.5 dyne/cm2 , = 2, =
stenosed artery and the skin friction of the Newtonian fluid in 5 cm, and 0 = 0.40 are used to evaluate the expressions of
the same stenosed artery. The expression for skin friction with these flow quantities and get data for plotting the graphs.
effects on the non-Newtonian behavior of blood is obtained
as follows: 4.1. Skin-Friction
1 16 03
2 = = + ( ) 4.1.1. Effects of Stenosis on Skin-Friction. The variation of skin
(/0 )3 49 friction 1 with axial distance for different values of 0 / and
(28) yield stress with = 4 is shown in Figure 4. It is observed
3
8 1 that the skin friction increases considerably with the increase
+ 0 ,
7 (/ )3/2 in the stenosis length for a given value of yield stress , but it
0 decreases very slightly when the yield stress increases for the
where fixed value of 0 /. The same observations were recorded by
Misra and Shit [17] for the Herschel-Bulkley fluid.
4 The variations of skin friction 1 at the midpoint of the
= . (29)
03 stenosis with stenosis height /0 for different values of the
yield stress with = 7 and 0 / = 0.3 are sketched in
4. Numerical Simulations of the Results Figure 5. It is noted that the skin friction decreases marginally
as the yield stress increases.
The objective of this study is to discuss the effects of various The estimates of skin friction 1 for different values of
parameters on the physiologically important flow quantities axial variable and viscosity coefficient with = 0.05 and
6 Journal of Applied Mathematics
2 c = 0.0, L 0 /L = 0.3 Table 1: Variations of the skin friction 1 with axial distance for
L 0 /L = 0.3, c = 0.05 different values of viscosity with = 0.05 and 0 / = 0.3.
c = 0.1, L 0 /L = 0.3
1.8
L 0 /L = 0.2, c = 0.05
c = 0.5, L 0 /L = 0.3
1 1.6 =2 =4 =7
L 0 /L = 0.1, c = 0.05
1.4 1.5 1.01069 1.010799 1.010864
1.2
1 1.104858 1.105946 1.106599
0.5 1.490229 1.495693 1.49897
1 0 1.915269 1.926048 1.932516
1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
0.5 1.490229 1.495693 1.49897
z
1 1.104858 1.105946 1.106599
Figure 4: Variations of skin friction 1 with axial distance for 1.5 1.01069 1.010799 1.010864
different percentages of stenosis 0 / and yield stress .
H
1 1.8
er
sc
he
1.6
c = 0.5 1 1.6
l-B
ul
1.4
kl
ey
1.2 1.4
u
di
1
wi
th
1.2
n
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 Herschel-Bulkley uid with n = 1.5
=
1.
05
a = /R0 1
1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
Figure 5: Variations of skin friction 1 with stenosis height for z
different values of yield stress .
Figure 6: Variations of skin friction 1 with axial distance for
different fluids.
1 2.4
2.2
Bell-shaped curve
0.95 2 c = 0.5
c = 0.1
R/R0
2 1.8
0.9 1.6 c = 0.05
0.85 Cosine curve 1.4 c = 0.0
1.2
0.8 1
1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
z z
Figure 8: Comparison of cosine- and bell-shaped stenosis shapes. Figure 10: Variations of skin friction 2 with axial distance for
different values of yield stress .
3
2 L 0 /L = 0.1 2.5
c = 0.5
1.8 L 0 /L = 0.2 2 2 c = 0.1
2 1.6 L 0 /L = 0.3 c = 0.05
1.5
1.4 c = 0.0
1.2 1
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
1 a = /R0
1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
z Figure 11: Variations of skin friction 2 with stenosis height /0 for
different values of yield stress .
Figure 9: Variations of skin friction 2 with axial distance for
different values of stenosis size 0 /.
Table 2: Estimates of resistance to flow 2 and skin friction (dimensionless) 2 in arteries with different radii with 0 / = 1.
2 k=2 2.5
1.8 k=4 2
2 1.6
2 1.5
1.4
k=7 1
1.2
0.5
1
1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 0
z 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
z
Figure 12: Variations of skin friction 2 with axial distance for
Casson fluid
different values of viscosity .
Herschel-Bulkley uid with n = 0.95
Bingham fluid
Herschel-Bulkley uid with n = 1.05
2.5
2 Figure 14: Variations of skin friction 2 with axial distance for
different fluid models with bell-shaped stenosis.
2 1.5
1
2 Cosine curve-shaped geometry
0.5
1.8
0 Bell-shaped geometry
1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 1.6
z 1.4
1.2
Casson fluid
Herschel-Bulkley uid with n = 0.95 1
Bingham fluid 1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5
Herschel-Bulkley uid with n = 1.05 z
Figure 13: Variations of skin friction 2 with axial distance for Figure 15: Variations of skin friction 2 of Casson fluid model with
different fluid models with cosine-shaped stenosis. axial distance for different geometries.
computed for arteries with different radii and with = 2 and to flow and skin friction increase significantly when stenosis
0 / = 1 from (23) and (28) (normalized with Newtonian height increases. Comparisons of resistance to flow (2 ) in
fluid in stenosed artery) and are presented in Table 2. It is bell-shaped stenosed arteries and cosine curve-shaped
noted that the resistance to flow increases, considerably when stenosed arteries with different values of stenosis size
the stenosis height increases and skin friction significantly parameters , 0 , and are given in Table 4. It is recorded
increases with the increase of stenosis height. that the resistance to flow in bell-shaped stenosed artery
The percentages of increase in resistance to flow and skin increases considerably when the length of the stenosis
friction over that for uniform diameter tube (no stenosis) increases, and also it significantly increases when stenosis
and for arteries with different radii are computed in Table 3. height increases. But it marginally decreases with the increase
One can observe that the percentages of increase in resistance of the stenosis length parameter . It is also found that for
Journal of Applied Mathematics 9
Table 3: Estimates of the percentage of increase in resistance to flow 2 and skin friction 2 for arteries with different radii with 0 / = 1
and = 0.04 dyn cm2 .
= 0.10 = 0.15
Blood vessels
(%) (%) (%) (%)
Aorta 1.529080 102 20.31 32.25 34.00 54.23
Femoral 5.718029 103 21.13 34.00 35.44 57.28
Carotid 4.571948 103 21.27 34.31 35.69 57.82
Coronary 8.733753 104 22.00 35.86 36.97 60.53
Arteriole 5.629388 103 21.14 34.03 35.45 57.32
Table 4: Estimates of percentage of increase in resistance to flow 2 for arteries with different radii and with (i) bell-shaped stenosis (ii) cosine
curve-shaped stenosis.
2.4
2.2 1.4
n = 0.95
2 L 0 /L = 0.3
1.8 n=1 1.2 L 0 /L = 0.2
1.6 1 L 0 /L = 0.1
1.4 n = 1.05
1.2 1
1
0.8 0.8
1.5 1 0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
z a = /R0
H = 0.0
H = 0.3 Figure 17: Variations of flow resistance 1 with stenosis height /0
H = 0.5 for different values of stenosis length 0 /.
Figure 16: Variations of skin friction with axial distance for different
values of power index and yield stress . 1.8
1.6 L 0 /L = 0.1 L 0 /L = 0.2
1.4
a given set of values of the parameters, the percentage of 2
1.2
increase in resistance to flow in the case of bell-shaped ste- L 0 /L = 0.3
nosed artery is slightly lower than that of cosine curve-shaped 1
stenosed artery. This is physically verified with the depth of 0.8
the stenosis for cosine-shaped stenosis (shown in Figure 8) 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
being more; the resistance to flow is higher in this type a = /R0
of stenosis geometry compared to the bell-shaped stenosis
geometry. Figure 18: Variations of flow resistance 2 with stenosis height /0
for different values of stenosis length 0 /.
5. Conclusion
The present study analyzed the steady flow of blood in a nar- with the results of Chaturani and Ponnalagar Samy [16] (for
row artery with bell-shaped mild stenosis, treating blood as blood flow in cosine curve-shaped stenosed arteries, treating
Casson fluid, and the results are compared with the results of blood as Herschel-Bulkley fluid model). The main findings of
Misra and Shit for, Herschel-Bulkley fluid model [17] and also the present mathematical analysis are as follows:
10 Journal of Applied Mathematics
International
Journal of Journal of
Mathematics and
Mathematical
Discrete Mathematics
Sciences