Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Thermophysical properties of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) specic mass, specic heat and thermal
Received 29 May 2013 conductivity were obtained experimentally at 30 min intervals in order to model and simulate the mass
Received in revised form 2 September 2013 and heat transfer phenomena involved in a drying process. Thermal diffusivity was calculated using the
Accepted 3 September 2013
former properties. Empirical models obtained by nonlinear regression were successfully tted to the
Available online 27 September 2013
thermophysical properties rates. Using the data of thermophysical properties in function of moisture
content, the theoretical drying model was simulated and validated by the experimental results of yacons
Keywords:
moisture content and temperature, providing determination coefcients higher than 0.97.
Drying
Thermophysical properties
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Numerical modeling
Yacon
0017-9310/$ - see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.09.004
1164 C.A. Perussello et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 67 (2013) 11631169
Fig. 1. (a) Yacon in natura; (b) sliced, peeled and osmotic treated yacon.
2.1. Materials
2.2. Methods Fig. 2. Device used to determine specic heat and thermal conductivity: (a)
Thermal properties analyzer KD2-Pro; (b) sensor TR-1; (c) sensor SH-1.
where q is the specic mass [kg/m3], m is the yacon mass [kg], V0 is DrC hm C eq C in 0 < r < R if z 0; 0 < r < R if z
the initial water volume [m3] and Vf is the nal water volume [m3]. e and 0 < z < e if r R 9
Thermal diffusivity was calculated by:
and
k
a 2
@C
qCp2 0 in 0 < z < e if r 0; 10
@r
where Cp is the specic heat [J/kgK] and k is the thermal conductiv-
ity [W/mK]. where C0 is the moisture concentration in the beginning of the pro-
All the thermophysical properties were determined at 30 min cess [mol/m3] and Ceq is the equilibrium moisture concentration
drying intervals. These data were tted to empirical models ob- [mol/m3].
tained by non-linear regression using the minimization of the least The heat and mass transfer phenomena are conjugated by the
square function. These models describe the yacons thermophysical thermophysical properties, which are dependent on moisture con-
properties in function of moisture content or temperature. tent. The mathematical model was solved by the software COMSOL
Multiphysics 4.3, which uses the Finite Element Method (FEM) to
2.2.3. Mathematical modeling solve partial differential equations [24].
The computational domain is represented by a nite cylinder,
according to Fig. 4. 2.2.4. Heat and mass transfer coefcients
The heat and mass transports were considered in two dimen- The convective heat transfer coefcient, h [W/m2K], was calcu-
sions, radius (r) and width (z). The thermal and mass balances were lated according to Holman [25] by
written based on the Fouriers Equation and the Second Ficks Law, Nu k1
respectively [23]: h 11
d
@T 1 @ @T @ @T where Nu is Nusselt number, k1 is the drying air thermal conductiv-
qCp kr k 3
@t r @r @t @z @z ity [W/m.K] and d is the yacon slice diameter [m].
Nu was calculated by Eq. (12) [26], a correlation between Rey-
and
nolds number (Re) and Prandlt number (Pr), which is applied to
@C @ @C 1 @C @ @C the uid ow through cylinders, valid for Pr P 0.7 and
D 4
@t @r @r r @r @z @z 0.4 6 Re 6 4105:
where T is temperature [K], t is process time [s], q is specic mass Nu 0:683Re0:466 Pr 1=3 12
[kg/m3], Cp is specic heat [J/kg.K], k is thermal conductivity [W/
Re and Pr were calculated according to Incropera & Dewitt [27] by
m.K], C is the moisture concentration [mol/m3] and D is the diffu-
sion coefcient [m/s2]. q1 m1 d
Re 13
The initial and boundary conditions for the heat transfer were l1
dened as: homogeneous temperature in the beginning of the pro-
cess (Eq. (5)), convection on the surface of the material (Eq. (6)) and
and null heat ux in the symmetry region (Eq. (7)): Cp1 l1
Pr 14
T T 0 for t t 0 in 0 < r < R and 0 < z < e; 5 k1
where l1 is the drying air viscosity [Pas], v1 is the velocity [m/s]
krT hT 1 T in 0 < r < R if z e and 0 < z < e if r R 6 and k1 is the thermal conductivity [W/mK].
and The convective mass transfer coefcient, hm [m/s], was calcu-
lated according to Holman [25] by
@T
0 in 0 < z < e if r 0 7 h
@r hm 2=3 15
a1
where T0 is the initial temperature [K], t0 is the initial process time, q1 Cp1 D1
T1 is the drying air temperature [K], R is the slice radius [m] and e is
the slice width [m]. where a1 is the air thermal diffusivity [m2/s] and D1 is the water
The initial and boundary conditions for the mass transfer were diffusivity on air [m2/s], available in Incropera & Dewitt [27].
dened as: homogeneous moisture content in the beginning of the The diffusion coefcient (D) was obtained by an inverse meth-
process (Eq. (8)), convective condition on the surface of the mate- od, called Differential Evolution Optimization [28], using a compu-
rial (Eq. (9)) and null mass ux in the symmetry region (Eq. (10)): tation code in Matlab. The numerical simulation was carried out
within an estimated interval for D between 109 and 1012 m2/s,
C C 0 for t t 0 in 0 < r < R and 0 < z < e; 8 typical for food products [2931].
1166 C.A. Perussello et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 67 (2013) 11631169
Fig. 5. Yacon (a) specic mass, (b) specic heat, (c) thermal conductivity and (d) thermal diffusivity versus moisture content during convective drying.
Fig. 6. Yacon (a) specic mass, (b) specic heat, (c) thermal conductivity and (d) thermal diffusivity versus temperature during convective drying.
C.A. Perussello et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 67 (2013) 11631169 1167
Fig. 7. Temperature versus time during the convective drying of yacon conducted
Fig. 9. Moisture content versus time during the convective drying of yacon.
at (a) 80 oC and (b) 60 oC.
Kjeldahl digestion method. The fat evaluation was obtained by (9.69e8 to 1.30e7 m2/s) decreased. Table 1 shows the tted
continuum extraction in Soxhlet type equipment and the ashes mathematical models by nonlinear regression used in Fig. 5, which
analysis or xed mineral residue was carried out by the mass loss describe the measured thermophysical properties of yacon as a
through the incineration of the sample in a mua stove at 550 C. function of its moisture content.
Total carbohydrates were calculated by difference. All analyzes The theoretical drying model described in Section 2.2.3 was
were conducted in triplicate. implemented and solved by the FEM providing the results pre-
sented in Figs. 710. The heat and mass transfer coefcients as-
3. Results and discussion sumed higher values to the drying process carried out at 80 oC,
as expected, as presented in Table 2.
Figs. 5 and 6 present the thermophysical properties of yacon Fig. 7 presents the temperature variation of the yacon slices
during the convective drying conducted for 3 h, plotted in function during convective drying. The determination coefcients between
of moisture content and temperature, respectively. According to experimental and numerical results are high (R2 > 0.97) and the
Fig. 5, the results are the same for a given moisture content, regard- differences can be attributed to the onoff temperature controller
less of the drying temperature. When plotted in function of tem- of the tray dryer. Because of this kind of control, there is a variation
perature (Fig. 6), the results do not present a tendency, that is, in the drying air temperature along the process, resulting in a heat-
the thermophysical properties depend much more on the moisture ing prole of slices which is different than that obtained in an ideal
content than on temperature. In fact, since waters thermophysical condition, as predicted numerically.
properties are very different from those of the other components Fig. 8 illustrates the temperature prole of the yacon slices after
proteins, carbohydrates, fats and minerals its inuence on ther- 10 min of drying. After this time interval, there is still a signicant
mophysical properties of foods is signicant. It is known that temperature difference between center and edge of the slices. The
specic heat, thermal conductivity and thermal capacity increase thermal equilibrium was achieved after 45 min for 80 oC and
with moisture content. Thermal conductivity is more dependent 80 min for 60 oC, as can be observed in Fig. 8.
on moisture content than on temperature, which is usual in foods Fig. 9 illustrates the satisfactory agreement between numerical
of high moisture content [32]. In this study, specic mass varied and experimental results for the average moisture content varia-
from 1037 to 1644 kg/m3, decreasing with the product water frac- tion of the yacon slices during the convective drying. Both drying
tion. As the drying proceeded, specic heat (1304 to 3919 J/kgoC), curves exhibit the same behavior, presenting a constant drying rate
thermal conductivity (0.21 to 0.52 W/moC), and thermal diffusivity period followed by a decreasing one. The mass transfer is faster for
Fig. 8. Temperature prole of the yacon slices after 10 min of convective drying conducted at (a) 80 oC and (b) 60 oC.
1168 C.A. Perussello et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 67 (2013) 11631169
Fig. 10. Moisture content prole of the yacon slices after 180 min of convective drying conducted at (a) 60 oC and (b) 80 oC.
Table 2 Conclusion
Heat and mass transfer coefcients for the convective drying.
Thermophysical properties of yacon, such as specic mass, spe-
Drying Pr Re Nu h (W/mK) hm (m/s) D (m2/s)
temperature (oC) cic heat, thermal conductivity and thermal diffusivity, were ob-
tained experimentally. Empirical correlations between these
60 0.70a 830b 13.88b 9.60b 1.04e2a 5.79e11b
80 0.72a 847a 14.13a 9.96a 1.05e2a 2.37e10a results and the product moisture content were obtained. These
data were used in the simulation of a 2D axysimmetric transient
a,b
averages from the same column with different characters are statistically dif-
and conjugated heat and mass transfer model. The satisfactory
ferent (p 6 0.05).
agreement between numerical and experimental data for moisture
content and temperature indicates the validity of the results of
thermophysical properties obtained for yacon. Considering there
Table 3
Centesimal composition of yacon in natura.
is no compilation of data on thermophysical properties for this
product, and that yacon is consumed primarily in dried form, this
Component (%) This work [18] [33] [34] [35]
work represents an important contribution to the studies related
Moisture w.b. 89.85 4.18 88.68 1.02 89.8 1.92 90.63 86.490.2 to the optimization of thermal processes and the design of efcient
Proteins 0.53 0.06 0.26 0.12 0.45 0.03 0.33 0.30.5 dryers for this tuber.
Fats 0.57 0.30 0.07 0.04 0.06 0.01 <0.10 0.10.5
Minerals 0.31 0.05 0.34 0.00 0.34 0.02 0.39 ND
Carbohydrates 8.88 4.33 ND ND ND ND
Acknowledgements
ND = not determined.
The authors would like to thank CAPES (Brazil) for the scholar-
80 oC, as expected. According both to the numerical and experi- ship granted to the rst author.
mental results, the equilibrium moisture content (0.0204 kg/kg
for 60 oC and 0.0129 kg/kg for 80 oC, respectively) was not achieved
until 3 h of drying, that is, there is still a moisture gradient be- References
tween center and edge of the slices (Fig. 10). However, the desired
[1] C. Kumar, M.A. Karim, M.U.H. Joardder, Intermittent drying of food products: a
value of water activity (0.4) was achieved in 180 and 50 min, critical review, J. Food Eng. 121 (2014) 4857.
respectively, corresponding to a moisture content of 0.59 and [2] M. Beedie, Energy saving a question of quality?, Dairy Ind Int. 60 (12) (1995)
0.56 kg/kg. 2735.
[3] B.A. Fricke, B.R. Becker, Evaluation of thermophysical property models for
The validation of the numerical results indicates the reliability
foods, HVAC&R Res. 7 (4) (2001) 311330.
of the thermophysical properties obtained herein. It is well know [4] ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning
that thermophysical properties of foods vary strongly with the Engineers, Refrigeration handbook, ASHRAE, Atlanta, 2002.
chemical composition especially water content. These properties [5] M.R. Okos, Y. Choi, Physical and Chemical Properties of Foods, American
Society of Agricultural Engineers, Michigan, 1986.
vary continuously during drying processes, since moisture content [6] D. Campos, I. Betalleluz-Pallardel, R. Chirinos, A. Aguilar-Galvez, G. Noratto, R.
is being reduced. The differences in these properties rates between Pedreschi, Prebiotic effects of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius Poepp. & Endl), a
the beginning and end of a drying process are very important, as source of fructooligosaccharides and phenolic compounds with antioxidant
activity, Food Chem. 135 (1) (2012) 15921599.
could be seen in Fig. 7. Considering that the thermophysical prop- [7] R. Hartemink, K.M.J. Vanlaere, F.M. Rombouts, Growth of enterobacteria on
erties are directly involved in the governing equations of heat and fructo-oligosaccharides, J. Appl. Microbiol. 383 (1) (1997) 367374.
mass transfer, any inadequacy in these rates can lead to erroneous [8] Q. Shi, Y. Zheng, Y. Zhao, Mathematical modeling on thin-layer heat pump
drying of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) slices, Energy Convers. Manage. 71
results regarding to moisture and temperature proles. Therefore, (1) (2013) 208216.
the experimental thermophysical properties can be considered val- [9] F.R. Reis, M.K. Lenzi, G.I.B. de Muiz, S. Nisgoski, M.L. Masson, M. L., Vacuum
idated if a satisfactory comparison between simulated and experi- drying kinetics of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) and the effect of process
conditions on fractal dimension and rehydration capacity, Drying Technol. 30
mental results of the drying theoretical models is obtained. (1) (2012) 1319.
It is important to mention that the empirical models tted to [10] F.R. Reis, M.K. Lenzi, M.L. Masson, Effect of vacuum drying conditions on the
specic mass, specic heat, thermal conductivity and thermal dif- quality of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) slices: process optimization toward
color quality, J. Food Process. Preserv. 36 (1) (2012) 6773.
fusivity of yacon in function of moisture content can be used with
[11] C.F. Scher, A.O. Rios, C.B.Z. Norea, Hot air drying of yacon (Smallanthus
adequate precision, even if it is applied to tubers cultivated in other sonchifolius) and its effect on sugar concentrations, Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 44
regions and conditions, given the data presented in Table 3 show (11) (2012) 21692175.
that the variations of moisture content between yacon roots ob- [12] S.B. Quirion, S. Villeneuve, D.I. LeBlanc, P. Delaquis, Thermophysical properties
and thermal behavior of leafy vegetables packaged in clamshells, J. Food Eng.
tained from different sources are not signicant. 113 (1) (2012) 2732.
C.A. Perussello et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 67 (2013) 11631169 1169
[13] H.F. Hassan, H.S. Ramaswamy, Measurement and targeting of thermophysical [25] J.P. Holman, Experimental Methods for Engineers, fth ed., McGraw-Hill
properties of carrot and meat based alginate particles for thermal processing Books, New York, 1986.
applications, J. Food Eng. 107 (1) (2011) 117126. [26] J.D. Knudsen, D.L. Katz, Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New
[14] C.A. Perussello, V.C. Mariani, L.A. Mendes, Development of a linear heat source York, 1958.
probe and determination of banana thermal conductivity, Int. J. Food Eng. 6 (1) [27] F.P. Incropera, D.P. Dewitt, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, third ed.,
(2010) 115. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 1990.
[15] V.E. Sweat, Modeling the thermal conductivity of meats, Trans. ASAE 18 (3) [28] R. Storn, Differential evolution a simple and efcient heuristic for global
(1974) 564568. optimization over continuous spaces, J. Global Optim. 11 (1) (1997) 341359.
[16] V.E. Sweat, Thermal properties of foods, in: M.A. Rao, S.S.H. Rizvi (Eds.), [29] C.A. Perussello, V.C. Mariani, A.C.C. Amarante, Numerical and experimental
Engineering Properties of Foods, Marcel Drekker, New York, 1995. analysis of the heat and mass transfer during okara drying, Appl. Therm. Eng.
[17] V.C. Mariani, A.G.B. Lima, L.S. Coelho, Apparent thermal diffusivity estimation 48 (1) (2012) 325331.
of the banana during drying using inverse method, J. Food Eng. 85 (1) (2008) [30] S. Curcio, M. Aversa, V. Calabr, G. Iorio, Simulation of food drying: FEM
569579. analysis and experimental validation, J. Food Eng. 87 (4) (2008) 541553.
[18] D.R. Heldman, Prediction models for thermophysical properties of foods, J. [31] J.E.F. Carmo, A.G.B. Lima, Drying of lentil including shrinkage: a numerical
Marcel Dekker, New York, 2002. simulation, Drying Technol. 23 (1) (2005) 510527.
[19] V. Kotovicz, Optimization of the osmotic dehydration and drying of yacon [32] M.E. Shmalko, R.O. Morawicki, L.A. Ramallo, Simultaneous determination of
(Polymnia sonchifolia). Master thesis, Federal University of Paran, Curitiba, PR, heat capacity and thermal conductivity using the nite difference method, J.
Brazil, 2011. (In Portuguese). Food Eng. 31 (1) (1996) 531540.
[20] M.L. Sapata, A. Ferreira, L. Andrada, A.E. Leito, M. Candeias, Osmotic [33] I. Michels, Technological aspects of the minimum processing of yacon tubers
dehydration of mandarins: inuence of reutilized osmotic agent on (Polymnia sonchifolia) conditioned in modied atmosphere packaging, Master
behaviour and product quality, Food Sci. Human Nutr. 3 (1) (2009) 2335. Thesis, Federal University of Paran, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 2005. (In Portuguese).
[21] D. Torreggiani, Osmotic dehydration in fruit and vegetable processing, Food [34] C.P. Moura, Aplication of neural networks to predict and optimize the drying
Res. Int. 26 (1993) 5968. process of yacon (Polymnia sonchifolia) with pre osmotic treatment, Master
[22] R. Matissek, F.M. Schnepel, G. Steiner, Anlisis de Los Alimentos: Fundamentos, Thesis, Federal University of Paran, Curitiba, PR, Brazil, 2004. (In Portuguese).
Mtodos, Aplicaciones, rst ed., Acribia, Zaragoza, 1998. [35] M. Hermann, I. Freire, C. Pazos, Compositional Diversity of the Yacon Storage
[23] K.J. Valentas, E. Rotstein, R.P. Singh, Handbook of Food Engineering Practice, Root; Program Report 19971998, International Potato Center, Lima, 1998.
CRC Press, New York, 1997.
[24] R.W. Pryor, Multiphysics Modeling using COMSOL: a First Principles Approach,
Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, 2011.